Advertisement

The Memphis Shooting is Another Government Failure

Image via NYT, Memphis

A city brought to a standstill, Memphis was paralyzed by a roving shooter yesterday until he was finally arrested late that night. The 19 year old killed four and severely injured at three people, over several hours, as he live streamed his attacks and aired his list of grievances on Facebook live. This isn’t the first spree killing or mass killing where Social Media has been used as the tool to share the violence with the world, the Christchurch shooting is probably the most famous.

What is perhaps the most frustrating aspect, beyond the deaths and the disruptions, is that the shooter should still be in prison right now. The 19 year old was charged with attempted first degree murder and several other severe charges back in 2020. That series of violent offenses and the subsequent charges resulted in an aggravated assault conviction and a three year prison sentence.

But only 11 months of the sentence was served, and yesterday he took a full auto modified Glock, probably with one of the imported switches that have become popular and are highly illegal to install if you are not a manufacturer, and did this.

Screencap from the livestream, the shooter fires a burst at this man inside an auto parts store. The man was severely injured.

So lets recap.

A convicted violent felon, age 19, got their hands on an illegally automatic Glock pistol, after being released from prison having served less than 1/3 of their sentence, and shot at least seven people, killing four, and was streaming it to the world. The shooter had shot four people, starting at 1 a.m. with the slaying of a 24 year old man in his own driveway, before authorities were onto him after the AutoZone attack.

The shooter took a break after his first killing, he began shooting again at about 4:30 p.m., killing a man in his car and shooting a woman in the leg at two separate locations.

It wasn’t until 6 p.m. when the shooter live streamed his attack at AutoZone (shown above) resulting in a critical injury, that authorities got a bead on his activities. The shooter continued the video stream talking to the camera while driving and filming shooting at victims with the automatically modified Glock. He carjacked on two separate occasions, killed one of the drivers in the street, and continued his reckless and carefree rampage until being captured late Wednesday night.

“If Mr. Kelly served his full three-year sentence, he would still be in prison today and four of our fellow citizens would still be alive,” the Memphis mayor said.

Once again we see that rules are only as effective as a society’s ability to enforce them in a swift and judicious manner. A single young man, who couldn’t be bothered to give a damn about anyone but himself, who publicly displayed his brutalities and lack of concern exhibitionist style, brought Memphis to a halt and took the lives of four people. All because the justice system couldn’t be bothered to keep him in prison until 2024 when his sentence, for a much lesser charge compared to the originals he was on trial for, was complete.

But I’m sure someone will propose a gun control law that would ‘fix’ this instead.

Don’t Trust The Veteran About Guns

In an unplanned second in what is looking to become a fairly regular series, we have a follow up to Don’t Trust The Old Gun Guy. Don’t Trust The Veteran About Guns. Not all veterans are created equal. They have wildly different service experiences, wildly variable job responsibilities, and vastly different levels of competence within them.

Veteran doesn’t equate to a weapons expert, a use of force expert, or a valid perspective to comment upon domestic safety concerns. It can be a foundational background that furthers those knowledge bases, but it in no way confers them.

And that’s where we get word vomit like this,

Assault gun ban, Biden and verbal blunders

Just as I was starting to write this column, I heard about the Uvalde, Texas school shooting which killed 19 little children and two adults.

This left me angry

Yes, senseless death tends to do that.

and my anger is directed more towards the politicians and other enablers than it is towards the shooter.

Okay, pause. Why are we again borrowing culpability from the actual murderer? The monster who decided and carried out the massacre, why are we more mad at the uninvolved? In what world are we assigning them the task of predicting and interceding on every bad event ever?

This issue, just like everything these days, will be politicized with each party blaming the other which is their substitute for doing something to fix the problem.

Welcome to politics, if they can get credit for being mad about something instead of doing something they will. Useful idiots fuel this fire.

I am familiar with assault weapons as a result of my wartime service

Here.

We.

Go.

The false expertise fallacy, Veteran edition.

I’ve gone into detail here and others have gone into detail elsewhere about the fact that “assault weapons,” aka service rifles, are the second weakest weapon in the hands and care of US Troops for conducting combined arms warfare. Only the sidearm is less potent. But it is the most effective personal defense weapon design to be used in conjunction with combined arms.

but there is absolutely no valid reason why such weapons are permitted in our civilian society.

Ahhh, valid reason. So this is entirely your subjective opinion, based upon faulty biased data, because it makes you the big sad and you cannot rationalize all the valid reasons people own personal rifles, including literally millions of veterans who disagree with you and hold the same ‘expert voice’ card you do.

It is a fact that such weapons were outlawed at one time

Eh, you don’t understand how the grandfathering and annoying neutered versions of the same guns existed from 94-04 worked do you? Nope, I thought not.

but the prohibition expired during the GW Bush administration and when in control neither political party has acted on renewing it.

It was reviewed and found to be entirely ineffective at stopping mass killings (evidence Columbine) or influencing the general homicide rate. So maybe that was the reason?

It is disgusting that these politicians take contributions from the National Rifle Association and then perpetuate the wishes of the NRA.

Now do pharmaceuticals, energy, oh and simply lobbying for lobbying. No?

The Supreme Court did not help when they issued a decision on a case called Heller v Washington, DC in which they interpreted the second amendment to mean other than what it literally states which is that the right to keep and bear arms should be permitted to “ a well regulated militia.”

Permitted to? Is that “…the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” meant when it literally states the people? I must’ve misread that. If only there were a place we could look it up, or another court decision where SCOTUS clarified it like Bruen. Just because you’re mad about it doesn’t make them wrong, you right, or anywhere in between, it just means the decision upset you.

A militia is an organization like the National Guard but the court interpreted it to be any person.

Must be that pesky ‘the people‘ part.

And who is the Militia?

I ask, Who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers. But I cannot say who will be the militia of the future day.” – George Mason, Virginia Ratification.

Since this day the US has adopted a standing military, professionalized it, and brought an increasing number of people into the legal fold as full citizens of the US. They never at any point closed away selective service or declared citizens were no longer part of the Militia. So if anything, we’re just bigger and better than ever baby. Sorry about your reading comprehension.

And, of course the States have laws, which are supposedly within the federal law but are, in fact, less regulatory.

Huh? What? That… they are under Federal law and a State cannot loosen federal law, they can only go further restrictive if there is regulation. Like allowing or disallowing NFA items. States cannot declare you don’t need a NICS check for a Federal transaction, the Federal government can say what counts in place of one though.

Our useless politicians have not only done nothing about assault weapons but are not even able to legislate tough background checks.

*Sigh* This UBC garbage again? Alright hotshot, what are we missing in the prohibitive person category that will not prosecute innocent people, jail innocent people, and otherwise have a drastically bigger negative impact while failing to stop the next mass shooter who has no disqualifying background…

Interestingly, I had planned to write about the Parkland, Florida School shooting so I will still go ahead with that since it further highlights incompetence at both Federal and local levels.

Oh, we’re highlighting incompetence alright… carry on.

The year was 2018, the date was February 14 and the place was Marjorie

Stoneham High School in Parkland, Broward County, Florida.

Broward has just covered themselves in glory since then too…

On that day, Nicholas Cruz ,age 18,

19.

used his assault weapon to kill 17 people and wound 17 others.

That he did.

Broward County had hired a new Superintendent of Schools whose name was Robert Runcie. He was African American and came from the Chicago School System, which was one of the worst in America.

I hope this has relevance?

Nicholas Cruz was the perfect example of a ticking time bomb whose “red flag” behavior said loud and clear that he was a sure bet to initiate some sort of horrible, violent event.

The Broward County Sheriff’s Office received widespread criticism for its handling of the police response, both for not following up on multiple warnings about Cruz despite a lengthy record of threatening behavior and for staying outside the school instead of immediately confronting him.[9] This led to the resignations of several police officers who responded to the scene, and the removal of Sheriff Scott Israel.[9] A commission appointed by then-Governor Scott to investigate the shooting condemned the police inaction and urged school districts across the state to adopt greater measures of security. – Summary of aftermath of police action.

Prior to the arrival of Runcie,

Oh, we’re blaming Runcie. Why did we point out he is Black?

a person like Cruz when at the point of no return

As determined by who?

would have been turned over to the police and probably end up in jail.

Probably not. Evidence says not a great chance of this.

But Runcie was not happy with the fact that the number of disciplinary cases among minorities were far in excess of their numbers in the population so he instituted a new policy called “the Promise Program”

Which is consistent with policies across the nation right now on the equity train, lets not pretend Runcie’s policy is special or surprising.

Under the new program the unruly students would remain in the school system and not be referred to police.

Again, normal in many spots nationwide. Also Cruz was expelled in 2017.

So Cruz remained in the school system while his behavior became more and more dangerous.

But not at the School, he was placed in alternative education as nearly all such cases are. The priority in schools is to try and educate through and around any of a myriad of learning and behavioral problems hoping both that the children will mellow and mature into adulthood and not hamper them if when they do.

This program is completely normal and par for the course in public education and in most circumstances it benefits the student who does make it to contributive adulthood.

On Jan. 5, 2018 a woman contacted an FBI “tip line” about Cruz which, included specific information about his plan “ to shoot up a school”

The FBI completely ignored the tip, which, if acted upon, would have prevented the shooting.

Maybe. The “he was on our radar” meme is a meme for the reason. Do you know how many reports these systems are flooded with and the amount that never escalate to actionable needing intervention?

A lot. It is a lot.

They later paid 127 million dollars to a group of survivors who had filed a lawsuit against them.

As they should, they did fail to do anything.

On the day of the shooting the Broward County Sheriff’s office failed to respond properly and a school resource officer who was armed hid while Cruz killed 17 people.

Yep, they failed utterly too. Maybe since the Feds and State/Local can’t be trusted to ensure reasonable safety we should think about doing it ourselves?

Just a thought.

In October 2021 Cruz pleaded guilty but then had to go on trial for the  “penalty” determination, which would be execution or life without parole.

Yes, this is how the justice system works. Sentencing hearings.

Believe it or not but this trial is scheduled to take four months and is overseen by a Judge who has been called “incompetent”

So has every one of the presidents in my lifetime by their detractors, that means literally nothing. It’s like saying someone called him a big doodoo head. Besides, this is sentencing. He is guilty. He plead guilty. It is just the sentence now, since death penalties require appeals and so forth.

As of now, it has been four years and three months since this tragedy and still not over.

You mean the sentencing? No, that isn’t. Welcome, again, to the justice system. What is your point here? Did you want him summarily executed upon conviction?

On another subject I am asking the same question as I believe is being asked by President Biden’s staff members and that is “ How do we get Joe Biden to keep his mouth shut at times when he is unscripted and without his teleprompter?”

Retire him like someone his age normally is.

On three occasions in the last eight months Biden has been asked publicly about our position on defending Taiwan in the event of an invasion by China.

What? Why are we on Taiwan now? What is this oh Veteran expert? I thought my publication was flying by the seat of our pants but this is a trip.

I believe that they keep asking since they cannot believe his reply, which in each case has been that we have a commitment to defend Taiwan militarily, which is not true.

Is it? Is it also strategically the right move with our additional concerns beyond the Taiwanese people, the Japanese and Australians who we do absolutely have obligations to defend.

Here we have the President of the United States speaking in public to the whole world and making a statement on a critical matter that is completely incorrect.

Like his repeated comments on firearms?

In each case his staff members have had to correct him by pointing out that we do not have a commitment that he says we have.

But don’t correct the obvious errors on firearms.

In an interview with George Stepanopoulos, Biden said that our commitment to defend Taiwan is the same as that which we have with NATO, which is completely false.

Again, why did we pivot to Taiwan from assault weapons?

That gets me to thinking about the next hairbrained idea of our President and that is his approval of a “Disinformation Governance Board” which would be part of the Department of Homeland Security and reminds many logical thinking people of the George Orwell classic “1984.”

So assault weapon bad. Biden bad too. Neat.

So we have 17 Intelligence Agencies and a National Security Agency and now we need another similar Agency which would be headed by a woman who Politico said “had a record” which was completely unbalanced politically.

I mean, yes. But we said that about Chipman accurately too and I’d have a hunch you’d like him. Assault weapon bad!

And by the way — one last comment on Taiwan which is that no prior President has stated that we have a commitment to do what Biden says we have and they have completely avoided even suggesting what he says loud and clear but false.

Maybe he needs his private disinformation department.

Maybe you do too, bud.

Wow that was… certainly words.

I read that and reacted as I read and… just… wow…

So yeah, don’t just trust a ‘Veteran’ as that isn’t all that high a bar to clear, has a wide variety of jobs within its title coverage, has a wide variety of experience, expertise, and education levels within those jobs, and any number of other factors that render a given opinion as just that.

An opinion. One that shouldn’t be given any weight of experience or expertise. One that should be cataloged as a mildly interesting if unweighted datapoint that this gentleman doesn’t like ‘assault weapons’ for farcical reasons, doesn’t like Biden because Biden is old and sounds dumb, doesn’t see strategic value in defending Taiwan against China should it become a concern, and thinks that sentencing in the justice system is slow and doesn’t like a judge overseeing one case on it.

In other news water remains wet and composed of hydrogen, oxygen, and rando particulate bits suspended in it.

Every Day Carry Isn’t

The term “Everyday Carry” gets bandied about quite a bit in the corners of the internet where self-defense is discussed.

The phrase implies items that one would carry with them every single day.

Well here’s the challenge: I’m not doing the exact same thing or going to the exact same places every single day. Therefore, since mission drives the gear train (to steal a phrase from the late Pat Rogers), what I’m doing and where I’m going might influence my choice of defensive tools.

This is my EDC.

More accurately, these are the elements from which I select my EDC on a given day.

FIREARMS:

– Boresight Glock 19 Gen 5 w/ Swampfox Liberty & an Overwatch PolyDAT in a PHLster Enigma w/ a Dark Star Gear Orion

– Ruger LCR 22 w/ Eagle Secret Service grips in either the Enigma w/ DSG Apollo or a Mika pocket holster

– KelTec P32 w/ a Pachmyer grip sleeve in a Mika pocket holster

The selection is dictated by a combination of risk profile and and the level of discretion required.

The G19 is obviously the most optimal setup, but the hardest to truly conceal, especially in lighter weight or more tailored clothing. The P32 is my “I’m virtually guaranteed not to need a gun” gun. The LCR is the one that ends up in the rotation most often these days. It’s a good balance of performance and discretion for my needs most of the time. The pocket is slightly more accessible, the deep carry Enigma is lightly more undetectable.

KNIVES:

– Joe Watson CT-P

– Gen 1 Shivworks Clinch Pick “China Pick”

– Shivworks Push Dagger

– Special Circumstances Maleficus G10

– Zulu Bravo Dart G10 (not pictured)

I generally don’t carry a knife. If I AM it’s typically because I’m going someplace where I either can’t or really shouldn’t be carrying a gun, but still want to have a lethal force option available. I’ve been exposed to enough of the Shivworks/IA Combatives curriculum that I know how ugly and complicated it can get.

MEDICAL:

– 3rd Gen SOF-T Wide

– Celox Combat Gauze

– Wilderness Tactical #8 pouch

(Not Pictured)

– Mini H&H Compression Bandage

– FrogPro Ankle IFAK

The medical is pretty self-explanatory. I personally feel like TQs are a little over-emphasized in the private sector for the wrong reasons. I suspect their prominence in LE/MIL is because the presence of body armor reduced the number of penetrating injuries to the torso, so you see a much higher concentration of limb trauma. Not to say that TQs are bad to have, but I think the justification for them is drawing from a skewed data set.

LIGHT:

– Cloud Defensive MCH High Output

– Surefire Stiletto Pro

I’ll carry a light if I’m out in the afternoon or evening. It’s not an essential for me (outside of hurricane season) since I mainly exist in the cities & suburbs, and there’s virtually no instance where total darkness is a reality.

INTERMEDIATE FORCE:

– POM Industries OC

– Boston Leather M1dg3t (trying to avoid getting zukked)

– Shivworks Top Popper

POM is the 100% essential for me. It’s the thing I’ll literally never leave the house without (short of getting on an airplane). This and good verbal agility/social skills are doing to address 90+% of the social friction I’m going to encounter.

Saps are legal in Texas, and have the benefit of being the only tool I’m aware of that can modulate between deadly and less lethal force depending on how they’re applied. Impact weapons also have the added benefit of being the easiest to improvise effectively. Having some purpose build force options that don’t overtly look like defensive tools are also hugely beneficial.

SUPPORT GEAR:

– K’roo Indian River Jack (or other small knife for admin tasks)

– My Bad 20 & Fk Off Fiver

– Wallet

– Car key w/ Trunk Monkey Designs key fob

– Sunglasses (usually Persol 714s)

– Watch (Always analog. Usually mechanical)

The small pocket knives were called “pocket jewelry” in one of Tamara Keel’s recent articles, and she’s absolutely right. I like gear that’s aesthetically pleasing as well as functional if at all possible. All the other support gear is pretty much just to make life easier.

What Would a Modern Light Rifle Look Like? – A Thought Experiment

To dig into this subject, we have to dig into the definition of a light rifle. Admittedly it’s not as cut and dry as an assault rifle, or submachine gun, or semi-auto carbine. The only real popular light rifle is the M1 Carbine. The M1 Carbine completely exemplifies what a light rifle should be. 

Light being in the name tells you it should be small, light, and handy. It should be a semi-automatic platform that’s magazine fed. The round it fires would be between a pistol and intermediate cartridge round. It will have a longer range than a handgun but a much shorter range than a rifle. 

The light rifle concept died as the assault rifle became a thing. The military didn’t need an M1 Carbine in the face of the M16. To be fair, we don’t need a light rifle in the face of our massive amount of 5.56 AR-15s. However, I do think a modern variant would offer advantages to your average civilian user and thinks it’s also a fun thought experiment.  

The Modern Light Rifle 

First, we should ditch the 16-inch barrel. In fact, let’s just get rid of the entire NFA and call it a day…. If only. A light rifle should be an SBR or even a braced pistol if you don’t want to go the tax stamp route. The overall length should be something in the realm of 30 to 32 inches or so. It’s best for it to be a very short platform for close-quarter use. 

The gun should also be easy to accessorize with a modern AR-15 handguard. This type of platform could benefit from some form of magnified optic, and a 2X or 3X prism or a red dot paired with a magnifier would be perfect. The new Vortex 3X micro prism, in particular, would be a great option to keep things lightweight. Additionally, for defensive use, you should be able to add a light to the platform. 

What caliber should it chamber? That’s the real question. Something that sits between a pistol and intermediate rifle round. The current crop of ammo out there doesn’t provide a ton of options. The two that stick out most are the 5.7x28mm and 4.6x30mm. These are traditionally PDW calibers, but since PDWs are select fire, they can be light rifle calibers. 

Another attractive option would be the 7.5 BRNO or the .22 TCM, but neither of those currently comes in a semi-auto rifle format that I know of. What we see with these calibers is a rifle-like bullet design and a flat shooting nature out to 150 yards or so. 

Since the PDW calibers are more common, I would say they would need a projectile redesign. These were initially made for armor penetration. If we can ditch that and design a projectile that yaws inside the body, we’d have something quite capable. 

Purpose and Role 

The light rifle has a number of benefits over a traditional 5.56 carbine or even short-barreled rifle. The most significant being a much lighter recoil and a much less muzzle rise, especially in super short platforms. A 5.56 AR with an 8-inch barrel isn’t pleasant, but a 5.7 or 4.6 from an 8-inch barrel is quite nice and very soft shooting. 

You can squeeze off half a dozen rounds super fast, and the gun barely rises. This kind of control can be ultra-valuable for close-range home defense purposes. Tag that in with the fact most of these platforms weigh less than six pounds, and you get a weapon that is easy to use with one hand if necessary. I don’t mean just handle but maintain and fire with one hand. 

Outside of home defense, the light rifle could be a handy little gun for a number of purposes. You could tag predators with it easily and head shotting a coyote isn’t out of the realm of possibility. The extra range these rounds offer can be taken advantage of for a number of purposes. 

Modern Light Rifle Platforms 

Three platforms stick out to me that would make great modern light rifles. First is the Diamondback DBx57. This 3-pound gun uses the 5.7x38mm round and is ultra-thin, light, and smooth. It’s a fun shooter and very capable. 

The second is either the Banshee in 5.7 or the FourSix from CMMG. I’m partial to the FourSix and its mini direct impingement design, but radial delayed blowback is also nice. Both of these guns fit the role just right and are plenty capable. If you want your own you could make one with a lower, a CMMG barrel and bolt, and a 80% lower jig

Finally, the classic PS90 is a great option. The P90 was a PDW design, and the PS90 is a rifle variant with a 16-inch barrel. Even with the longer barrel, it’s still super short and handy. Plus, as an SBR, it’s the smallest of these platforms. 

Just a Thought Experiment 

I’m not saying you should rush out and trade in your carbines for these boutique guns. In fact, with the cost of their ammo, that’s a really silly proposition. I do think they offer some advantages versus the carbine but admittedly aren’t as versatile ballistically as a 5.56. I would love to see more development in this niche, but it’s just that, niche. I’ll stick to loving my FourSix, though, and hoping to see more ammo and gun developments in these calibers. 

The Z40: A Colt and CZ Partnership

CZ of all companies bought Colt. That’s big news and likely to be a welcome change. CZ is a modern company with modern ideas, and Colt is stuck in 1980. Hopefully, that breathes some new life into the classic American company. This isn’t the first time CZ and COlt have had dealings, and if this was a comedic revenge film, I could see why CZ would eventually buy Colt. CZ and Colt came together in the mid-1990s to produce a pistol known as the Colt Z40. 

The Forgotten Colt Z40 

In the mid to late 1990s, Colt bungled two modern handgun designs. The Colt Double Eagle was a failure of an attempt to produce a DA/SA 1911. Colt purchased a design from Reed Knight and Eugene Stoner, named it the Colt 2000, and then ruined a good design. Colt was in dire financial straits, which is a pattern Colt has repeated for centuries now. 

(Coutresy Bryant Ridge)

They wanted to bring a new pistol to market but didn’t have the money to develop it. Colt ended up looking at a little company called CZ. CZ in the mid-1990s wasn’t the CZ of today. They had a reputation for producing good firearms but weren’t known and weren’t household names like Colt. 

Colt wanted a new handgun and felt that CZ could build one. They would import it, and CZ would design and build it. Colt had only a few requirements. First, make it a 40 S&W. Second, make it look externally like a 1911, and third, make it double-action only. 

CZ said okay and went to work. 

Inside the Colt Z40 

CZ turned out the Z40, which is an interesting amalgamation of features. In was the 90s, so 40 S&W was the hot round. 45 ACP was going out the door, the 10mm was apparently too hot, and 9mm was still seen as lacking, and I’m using this term ironically, ‘stopping power.’ 

This was a full-sized duty pistol with a 4.37-inch barrel that weighed 31.9 ounces. It’s 80% 1911 and 20% CZ 75. The overall length was 8.07 inches, and the width was 1.40 inches. The slide was steel, and the frame was aluminum alloy. Voltech Anderle designed the shape of the gun, and interior mechanism work was done by Radek Hauerland. 

Capacity topped out at ten rounds because the AWB was in full effect, although 12 round magazines existed down.  

The frame most certainly looks like a 1911. It has that government look all over it. The slide came from a CZ 75-type pistol, and the combination makes an interesting-looking pistol. There is no safety, and the DAO action was the relied upon safety mechanism. 

Reportedly the pistol was fairly nice. The DAO trigger was about 13 pounds or so, but people were likely a little more used to that due to the time period. The ergonomics of the 1911 frame combined with the CZ operating system meant the ergonomics and reliability both scored high. 

So why did Colt only ever import 100 of them? 

Colt Ruined It

Smart gun technology is the answer. Colt, and well, most of the big firms were experimenting with smart guns and mixing electronics into guns. COlt modified a number of their revolvers and Z40 pistols into ‘smart’ guns, and the gun-buying public hated the idea. We still do now, and for good reason. 

Everyone then began associating the Colt Z40 with smart guns, and they languished. Colt walked away from the deal with CZ, and CZ was likely not very stoked. This is where their revenge story starts, and it ends with them buying Colt. Admittedly I made that up, but I’d like to think one Czech executive fist pumped when it happened. 

The DWX also mixes 1911s and CZ 75s

Later on, CZ would make the gun as the CZ 40B, but it was DA/SA, with a safety or decocker depending on what you wanted. I should also mention the DWX. 

CZ also purchased Dan Wesson, and Dan Wesson produces the DWX, which is another CZ/1911 hybrid. This gun features a CZ 75 frame with a 1911 slide, so it’s a bit of a reverse of the Z40. It’s neat how things come, go, and come around again. 

Now that Colt is owned by CZ maybe we’ll see the Z40 make a retro run. Probably not, but maybe a 9mm version? Odder things have happened. 

The Best Magnified Optics

Author shooting an EOTech VUDU 1-6x at Thunder Ranch Urban Precision Rifle

I wrote a piece awhile back covering some of my favorite RDS optics, and the reasons why I use them in various roles. I like trying everyone’s way to build the mouse trap to see if someone has unlocked a feature that really is worth adding.

In red dots, that’s rare, building a red dot is formulaic at this point.

But in magnified optics, considering the two focal planes, multitude of lenses, and variety of reticles you can combine to make them, the formula is far from set.

With that in mind, we will look at a few and where they go in the optical hierarchy. I’m going to cover a range of price options, capabilities, and where I believe fit most comfortably in finding a rifle to partner with.

If I don’t mention an optic you happen to like from a quality name, Kahles for example (I haven’t shot with them, ever), I won’t comment beyond that I know certain people like the sights and they’re people whose opinion I would trust in this space.

1. The Vortex Razor HD Gen III 1-10x

These are nice.

We’ll start with the optic I believe sets the current standard for what an LPVO can do, the Razor III 1-10x.

Vortex, seeing their competition filling the 1-8x field with strong offerings, leaped that whole space entirely and set about making a 1-10x that would be able to drop into the place of their Razor II-E 1-6x and provide a dramatically improved feature set. When I say drop in place I do mean literally, the intention was to be able to pick an identical optic mount in 34mm, instead of 30mm, and put the Razor III where the Razor II was.

The length of the optic didn’t change. The weight of the optic didn’t change. The eye relief changed by a small margin. The optic housing layout changed by a small margin with the control surfaces moving forward along the main tube. The maximum field of view remained the same (listed as improving by .8′) while the minimum at maximum magnification is only 9′ smaller for the 4x extra magnification power.

In practical terms, Vortex succeeded. Placing the Razor III with its ocular lens where the Razor II’s was prior would likely place it appropriately. The mount may end up one or two slots off, with another one to adjust for the difference in eye relief. The scope will occupy the same real estate as its predecessor, unlikely to disrupt any other ancillary gear you have placed on the rifle. Lights, sling mounts, lasers, etc. are probably just fine where they were.

Vortex saved some sharp end folk and their armorers a lot of headache with this.

With this swap (or purchase) the user gains,

  • Four Extra Magnification
    • The rifle optic now sees as far as an early GWOT sniper scope or standard binoculars
  • Front Focal Plane Translucent Reticle
    • Reticle is now always scaled to the target image
    • Reticle has several additional measurable data points for ranging and a BDC relevant for 5.56 NATO, 7.62 NATO, and likely 6.5 and 6.8 rounds
    • Reticle center is translucent and allows a target image to be seen through it, improving sight picture
  • Daylight/RDS Bright Illumination
    • The translucent reticle illuminates brightly, something other FFP LPVOs have not been able to achieve
    • The brightness matches excellent SFP offerings, like their own Razor II-E, and allows the Razor III to offer that full functionality
  • MRAD or MOA Options
    • In addition to the drop in place functionality for their own Razor II’s, the Vortex design team considered it as an upgrade for several legacy systems
    • The MOA variant can be used as a simple upgrade for systems previously running an ACOG TA31, TA11, or Elcan SpecterDR 1-4x or 1.5-6x
    • The MRAD variant can be used as a simple upgrade for more precision systems running Leupold Mk4 2.5-8x MR/T or 3.5-10x LR/T optics

The major limitation on the Razor III remains its price tag, Amazon has both variants at $2499. But for that price you get the LPVO with the greatest magnification range and one of the best reticle systems, with the best FFP illumination system, available on the market. It is the LPVO standard setting for the commercial market that successfully spans both the FFP and SFP roles. This optical flexibility allows the rifle and its user to be more flexible in their roles as well.

The Razor III is my current standard for what a ‘perfect’ general purpose rifle optic should offer.

2. The Sig Sauer Tango6T S-VPS 1-6x (also the Razor HD Gen II-E mentioned above)

When I stated above that there is no formula set for LPVOs, due to the available variations, that isn’t quite the case. Just as a myriad of red dot designs are basically Aimpoint T1/T2 clones, the formula for a stable LPVO goes thus: 1-6x, 30mm tube, 24mm objective lens, SFP, daylight bright illumination via fiber optic w/ wire reticle, simple usable reticle at 6x.

This is the Squad-Variable Power Scope, chosen by SOCOM to join the Razor II’s (with a nearly identical build), and I favor it more than the DVO or SDM optics that also made the military cut. Those Front Focal Plane optics have their place and roles but are more specialized in their spots atop general issue M4A1’s and M110A1’s respectively.

The S-VPS offers the user the following,

  • Formulaic Effective Range Magnification
    • The S-VPS offers the preferred 1-2x magnification for every 100 yards of effective range that most rifles have in any major caliber
    • Even for short barreled rifles or low velocity systems like .300BLK or 7.62×39 this will be highly usable effect
  • SFP Clarity and Illumination
    • Due to the fewer lenses required to make a Second Focal Plane Optic the sight picture is brighter and clearer in general
    • The wire reticle, as opposed to etch glass, is able to be constructed very robustly
    • Using fiber optic cable and an LED the center aiming point of the wire reticle can be illuminated far brighter and with more energy efficiency that front focal illumination off of an etched glass reticle
    • The BDC, while tuned to a specific round at 6x, is not the primary feature of the optic and doesn’t take up an unreasonable amount of internal space in the sight picture
  • A Red Dot +
    • The S-VPS can be treated like a red dot + variable magnifier in most senses of use focusing its effectiveness on precision within the flatter trajectory of the bullet flight
    • The M855A1 BDC reticle in the S-VPS, like the earlier JM-1, is accurate to trajectory at 6x magnification for longer shots out of the M4A1 or other 14.5″ barreled 5.56 NATO rifles and will give useable holds for most calibers in most popular barrel lengths
    • The clarity and simplicity of the system showcase that the LPVO can be run in close as well as at distance

The S-VPS showcases one of the finest examples of a simple well executed LPVO that retains the majority of the advantages present in a red dot. The price for one, or a similar Razor II-E, are in a far more agreeable $1100 to $1400 range.

That makes putting one on onto a rifle a great deal more manageable and giving you a great deal more spend efficiency. The excellent precision and ranging capabilities of FFP offerings are omitted, but in their place is a robust simplicity supporting the shots you will take far more often.

3. Primary Arms Compact PLx

The review on this 1-8x is recent enough that I will simply link it here.

To summarize however, the PLXc exhibits some of the best qualities available in a modern LPVO optic with excellent glass, field of view, and reticle design. This while both smaller in size and lighter in weight than most competing offerings. These specifications are wrapped into an otherwise very standard 30mm main housing and 24mm objective lens, keeping mount compatibility very high.

To summarize,

  • 1-8x Front Focal Plane
    • The magnification range allows it to cover the effective ranges of all intermediate and battle rifle calibers
    • FFP keeps target ranging information and BDC consistent
    • Detailed etched glass reticle system
  • ACSS Reticle System
    • The ACSS Developed by Primary Arms incorporates a center Chevron with a Horseshoe surrounding, this combination allows the user to bracket and shoot at a target quickly through the full magnification range and with or without the contrasting illumination on under most circumstances
    • The Chevron gives a true fine aiming point, something a dot can struggle to and a crosshair can sometimes occlude
    • 3 Reticle offerings with a generalized BDC in Yards, Meters, or a Mil-Grid reticle for precision work
  • Size and Weight in Common Profile
    • At 16.95oz. and 9.28in. long it is about 8% shorter and 21% lighter than the Razor II or III, with its magnification range in the middle
    • Lighter weight, especially while retaining or enhancing what previous optics have offered, make the Compact PLx formidable
    • 30mm optic body and 24mm objective lens make the optic compatible with most two ring one piece mounts and accessories

About the only thing I caution on, as I noted in the review, is the limit to the Compact PLx’s illumination. If you require a red dot bright center reticle look at the previous two or the following suggestion. They sell for $1499 at present.

4. Dot + Magnifier

If you believed this was going to be all LPVO’s, not so fast.

The RDS remains one of the best solutions for any firearm, including a carbine, to put a durable and reliable optic on top. Red dots are often paired with magnified optics as a backup, an offset/second zero, or a system to be utilized with passive aiming and night vision devices.

But what to do if you need magnification and it is your primary optic?

Easy, add a magnifier.

While the magnifier solution does not offer all the added flexibility of the LPVO, and it honestly was one I didn’t like very much until I shot with it enough, I favored the ACOG, it does offer a significant portion of those advantages.

A flip-to-side (or up, or down, or wherever out of the way) magnifier turns your 1x reflexive system into a 1x/3x, or 5x or 6x if you get the newer magnifiers from EOTech or Aimpoint, giving on demand magnification. My personal preference for these remains the 3x options. That 1x also keeps the forgiving eye positioning of the red dot, something the LPVOs and prisms do not.

Sticking with a red dot suggests that you are prioritizing speed. The red dot is still the fastest option for an aligned sight picture. LPVOs and anything with a restricted eyebox, including these magnifiers, will remain have presentation speed and position limits.

The FTS+QD magnifier option remains a strong one for sighting a carbine.

  • Simple
    • The Red Dot is simple, reliable, and proven optical system, that simplicity is carried into the magnifier too
    • No complicated scaled reticles or focal planes to worry about (these are effectively front focal plane), simply choose whether you want a 1x or a greater than 1x target image
    • Certain reticles will offer basic holds if desired
  • Robust
    • The simplicity in the construction of both the dot and the magnifier allow them to be made very durably
    • If one or the other component breaks it is simpler to replace or repair, the likelier component to fail is the magnifier and if it does it can be removed without taking the rifle out of action at all
  • On Demand
    • The Flip-to-Side and Quick Detach features that are included with the magnifier, I would avoid magnifiers without these features, make using or not using, removing, and adding the magnifier onto the rifle all very simple
    • This simplicity allows the user flexibility on their rifle
      • You may use the magnifier all the time at the range but remove it at home for the home defense gun
      • You may be shooting using NODs and the magnifier is interfering, even flipped, so just QD it and stow it
  • Cost
    • The cost of a premium tier red dot and magnifier combination only touches the middle tier of the quality LPVOs
    • The two parts be acquired separately to space out costs
    • More budget friendly and reasonably durable options exist much cheaper in the dot + magnifier options than in LPVOs

The Dot +Magnifier remains a flexible option with many advantages for most rifles and rifle users, the only limitations are the rudimentary on magnification range and reticle design. Cost for the highest end combinations top out at around $1500.

5. Steiner P4Xi

Steiner P4Xi, the perfect entry LPVO

The Steiner’s spec list is not cutting edge anymore. In actuality, it is pretty much what S&B offered Delta when they made the short dot back in the late 90’s and early 2000’s. It’s two decades old.

But the great thing about that feature set is it’s really good for nearly any carbine. A red dot feature inside a 1-4x scope with a simple BDC. Most of what the SVP-S and Razor II-E offer, but a little smaller, a little lighter weight, and significantly lighter on the wallet for excellent glass.

The P4Xi is an ideal entry optic if you’re entering the LPVO market for the first time. Top quality construction and feature set under $900. You can put it into a mount and onto a rifle for right about $1000, making it line up nicely in the rule of 1:1 spending on the less expensive duty quality rifles when paring them with optics.

If I needed to put together a rifle package on-the-cheap, with as much flexibility as as I can offer the user, the P4Xi would be the optic. Even if a user ends up wanting more magnification, reticle type, focal plane, etc. in the future, the P4Xi will undoubtedly cover down on most of the end user’s immediate requirements.

  • Simple
    • SFP
    • 30mm main tube
    • Bright Illumination
    • Simple BDC
  • Cost
    • Under four figure buy-in to an excellent quality LPVO
    • Less expensive options tend to further compromise on glass quality, internals quality, and aspects that can negatively influence durability

Honorable Mentions

The ACOG

The GWOT OG of nigh-indestructible scopes, the ACOG remains a popular and affordable (compared to many LPVOs) way to get an absurdly resistant and capable optic with some magnification behind it.

The Gen2 options, like the TA44 and TA50, are as small as red dots and offer the non-battery illumination, solid reticle, magnification, and construction.

While I’ll say LPVOs offer a far more flexible sight, it is difficult to outmatch the ACOG for simple and durable.

The EOTech VUDU

Now the VUDU is a line, and I was underwhelmed by the 1-6x offering. It felt like more of a working and commercially available proof of concept than a serious optic.

The FFP optic with the classic reticle layout (circle and “dot” center) was cool to do, but the uncapped and unlocked turrets beside the limited illumination hampered it keeping up with other 1-6’s

The 1-8x offering fixed many of these concerns. They capped the turrets, went SFP, and produced a strong contender for the SFP optic space. The only reason it didn’t make it into a ranked slot is the illumination control. The three button system they use is functional, but not as quick or as intuitive as the locking illumination design on the S-VPS.

Their new 1-10x looks very promising as well, I have not shot with it yet but I liked the production model features, especially the capped windage turret and locking elevation decisions, for something that can easily support the DMR/Urban Precision role also. The reticle offerings reflect this.

The magnified optic field is substantive and deepening with quality options coming out from manufacturers rapidly. These are just good starting points on the search.

A Visit To Big Tex Ordnance’s Headquarters

Big Tex Ordnance has Ike! He’s a good man and thorough. I like Ike. Everybody likes Ike.  And you’ll like Ike too. Visit Big Tex Ordnance [today].

[Editor’s Note: I too like Ike. Chris is alright. Chris actually reads these. Hi, Chris!]

And so I did. Recently, I drove over to Conroe, Texas where Big Tex Ordnance has their new flagship retail store and indoor range facility. Big Tex Ordnance is perhaps best known as an online-focused firearms industry retailer that deals in a wide variety of high-end firearms, gear and accessories.

Their signature move is to include pocket sized US Constitutions and themed stickers with each order they mail out. Moreover, if BTO isn’t actually the fastest outfit when it comes to shipping out customer purchases, it is most certainly in the running for the top contender. And while Ike wouldn’t directly admit this to me, he’s probably a stakeholder in the Topo Chico mineral water operation based in northern Mexico across the border from Texas. In short, BTO is a small outfit ran by a handful of very hardworking guys and gals. It was their level of customer service that got them a strong online following and loyal customer base, but they also stock the sort of stuff that a connoisseur might appreciate.

BTO has a vending machine full of Magpul firearm accessories

Who is Ike? Ike is the entrepreneur who started his own business, and at a relatively young age. The first steps of his BTO journey began circa 2014 after selling off his old Ford F-150 pickup truck to buy some equipment to Cerakote guns on the side. After making some money from this initial entrepreneurial endeavor, he eventually sold his Cerakoting gear and used those proceeds to buy a small amount of retail merchandise, which he began selling online.

He ran his first retail operation out of the back of a shed and eventually, that shed turned into a tiny warehouse. From that warehouse, Ike and his team recently expanded into their first brick and mortar shop that also happens to have a full size indoor gun range. Ike and his brother had been frequenting this particular indoor range for years and when the old owner was ready to retire, he offered BTO the chance to buy the business and take over.

[Editor’s Note: I still think they missed a golden opportunity to name the range Big Tex Indoors and keep Big Tex Outdoors as the general business name.]

That’s exactly what BTO did; they had their grand opening a little more than a year ago. BTO’s new headquarters has a classroom area, two twenty yard indoor pistol range partitions, and an additional 100 yard indoor rifle range, in addition to its general retail area and gun-rental counter.

Inside the shooting areas, the counters opposite from shooting stalls have thoughtfully tethered magazine loading gadgets that anyone is welcome to use while they are there shooting. I mention this because this is the first time I have ever seen an indoor range do this. Equally thoughtful is the fact that customers can find lead removing soap to rinse their hands when they are finished shooting in the restrooms.

Shooting a Staccato XC 9mm 2011 in one of BTO’s indoor pistol bays

Ike told me that with this latest and most drastic expansion yet, one of BTO’s goals was to turn their new headquarters into a regional training destination. BTO has been making efforts to host classes with nationally recognizable trainers and firearms instructors at this new facility. Becoming a training destination in Conroe is yet another way that BTO is trying to bring more value to the firearms community. After all, firearms are serious implements that can have lasting if not deadly consequences and everyone wins when training opportunities are easier to come by—especially in underserved geographical areas.

As a California refugee of several years now, a wall full of semi autos and display cases with all kinds of suppressors still bring a tear to my eye.

The first time I walked into Big Tex Ordnance’s brick and mortar store, I could not help but to notice how well stocked the entire shop is. Counters, walls, and display cases bristle with firearms like fruit trees in an orchard right before the harvest.

Besides the sheer amount of inventory, BTO also covers their bases quite well across firearms categories: by brand, category, price or style. To say that they had something for everyone at the shop is an understatement, especially for the size of their shop. I wouldn’t hesitate to say that their “menu” is better curated than that of a typical big box store that does put some emphasis on its gun counter.

Considering we’re on this side of the 2020 Covid pandemic, where we saw supply chain interruptions on practically everything, it is worth mentioning that some gun shops still have empty spaces on their walls or display counters. While I am aware that the ammo supply is starting to recover from these events and supply can be seen on most store shelves again nearly to pre-pandemic levels, BTO is ahead of the curve as the storefront sits chock full with all types of ammunition. They even have cases of overflow ammunition stacked like bricks along side part of the store by the range area. Some could say that these extra cases make the shop look cluttered, but after going through this most recent shortage, extra inventory is a welcome sight to me.

Checking out an ANCIENT Smith & Wesson K frame at BTO’s used-gun counter

I ordered a Surefire X-300-U B thousand lumen weapon mounted light from Big Tex Ordnance some time back in late 2020 after I bought my Beretta 92X Performance. I had never met Ike, nor had I ever been to Conroe, and at the time I was living in the American West, so the fact that my light arrived from the eastern portion of Texas to the mountains as quickly as it did frankly surprised me. (Especially because this happened at the same time most everyone else was experiencing major shipping delays during the pandemic). Expecting to hear about some sophisticated algorithm or other serious technological tool, I asked Ike what the secret to their scary quick shipping is. He just told me as a matter of fact that shipping was just something his team highly prioritized as they are always striving to do better. If you happen to be visiting the southeastern part of Texas near Houston, be sure to drop by and say hello to the friendly folks at BTO, you’ll be glad you did.

The view you see upon walking in through the main entrance

Cross Draw Holsters?

One of the least understood of holster types is the cross draw. Now, don’t adopt a carry style because it looks cool or because it looks “handy.” For some lifestyles and body types cross draw has many advantages. Don’t adopt this carry style casually, and then be certain to practice often.

With the cross draw you draw the handgun across the body, hence the name. The holster is worn on the non dominant side of the body in front of the hip. The muzzle is angled outward slightly and the grip canted to allow a rapid draw.

Most shooters execute cross draw presentation the wrong way. The wrong way is pretty slow and will get you killed if used in a life or death situation.

If you stand squared to the target reach across the body and then bring the handgun to bear you are slow. The muzzle will sweep more across your body rather than onto the threat’s body.  The proper cross draw presentation begins with the strong side foot to the rear and the weak side (carry side) hip pointed toward the target. The strong side hand moves at the elbow to grasp the gun butt. The handgun comes up out of the holster is raised to eye level and is pushed straight toward the target as the support hand meets the strong side hand. When properly executed and the handgun is brought up instead of across during the draw, the presentation from cross draw carry is fast and sharp.

If you are seated at work, in a restaurant, or while operating a motor vehicle cross draw is among the best type of belt holster. You may be seated and inconspicuously have hands near the pistol at all times. If you have rotator cuff injury and have difficulty reaching behind your back, use of the crossdraw will not stress your shoulder. Defending a gun grab is simple. Drop the elbow over the gun butt and strike with the strong side hand. A pistol in front of you is easy to protect, like appendix carry.

Be certain to choose a well designed cross draw. There are plenty of poorly designed examples. Among the better choices is the DeSantis Roscoe for small frame revolvers. Highly concealable and offering a sharp draw, the Roscoe answers a real need.

For large frame self loaders the DeSantis SkyCop is ideal. The SkyCop offers a sharp draw when seated. A tension screw and excellent molding are part of the design. For cowboy action, DeSantis offers the Doc Holliday cross draw. This is a well stitched holster with a good angle. Since I often carry a single action when hiking this holster gets a lot of use. Carefully consider a cross draw holster. It may be the ideal choice for many situations. 

The Bullpup That Could (and Can): Austria’s Steyr AUG

Brandon once again steps away from AKs to look at something different.

The Steyr AUG is probably the iconic bullpup. It had excellent pop culture representation, among its most notable being Die Hard, and it was one of the few service rifles that were adopted outside its home nation by other prominent NATO powers.

Australia and New Zealand picked up AUGs and continued their own development chain on modernizing the rifles. They were even slated to come to the states, but that evoparted due to gun control shenanigans.

Disappointed, the Lithgow AUG evolution, the F90, is rather brilliant. Especially in its NATO/STANAG configuration.

They offer a native 14.5″ barreled variant that would probably hit the 26″ OAL with a pinned silencer muzzle device of choice and that would be awesome.

But, not right now.

Right now Brandon talks about the Austrian evolution, the AUG A3. A Rifle that looks fantastic in arctic.

The Pineworld K5 Safe – High Tech, Fast, and Secure

Safety is paramount, right? Well, when you own guns, a safe is just part of your life. Modern safes come in all shapes and sizes, and today we are looking at one of the mini handgun safes designed for handguns. The Pineworld K5 offers you a high-tech safety solution that allows you to both secure your firearm and also to have easy access to it. If you’re not carrying a firearm, it should be secured, correct? 

At the same time, you may need rapid access to that gun for defensive purposes. The Pineworld K5 promises to grant you that without compromising security. I’ve been testing the K5 for about a month now, and their promise rings true. 

The Pineworld K5 Security Mechanisms

First the foremost, this is a handgun safe. It’s small, but not micro-sized. At 16 pounds, it can be snatched and grabbed, but the safe is designed to be either bolted down or cabled secured to ensure a quick snatch and grab isn’t possible. You can squeeze two full-sized handguns into the K5 or a single handgun with magazines, holsters, RDS, light, etc. 

There are three ways to open the K5. First is your basic keys. Put them in, give them a twist, and the gas springs push the lid upward with some force. Your keys are really a backup option for opening the safe. 

The K5’s claim to fame is biometrics, a fancy way to say it scans your fingerprint. Fingerprint safes can be tricky. I remember trying an old Barska years ago and being thoroughly unimpressed. I’m guessing the technology has made some leaps. The K5 allows you to save up to 50 fingerprints and multiple users. I scanned my five fingers numerous times at different angles to ensure an accurate scan regardless of the angle my finger approached it. 

I’ve opened it hundreds of times at different angles, and it takes a lot to get an inaccurate scan. It really takes effort to mess it up. If you don’t trust biometrics or aren’t fully confident, you also need to set a six-digit password. The buttons are huge and easy to hit and press with a solid tactile feeling. Hit the six digits, hit the checkmark, and the safe opens rapidly. 

K5 Construction and Power 

Pineworld uses ten gauge steel to construct the box, and for a tiny safe like this, the ten gauge is fairly robust and durable. It’s strong enough to take a hit from a 115 grain 9mm round and not break. 

Anything that uses electronics uses power, and a set of AA batteries makes this thing tick. Although there is a USB-C slot to provide power in case the batteries die or if you just prefer to plug it in. 

The safe makes lots of noises. When it’s open, it makes an alert. When you hit the buttons, they beep, and that might be a security concern for some. The element of surprise can also be advantageous. Luckily I dug around in the manual, and you can mute it, and the only noise is the pistons opening the door. 

Speaking of noise, you also have a pry-proof alarm. I tried to slip a flat head screwdriver under the lid and pop it up, and sure enough, the thing started popping off. If you plan to test this, great, but make sure you know how to turn the alarm off. I didn’t go that far; all it takes is a successful fingerprint scan. 

There is also an app via Tuya that will allow you to manage users, view the log history, and log the alarm. You’ll also get notified when someone tries to open the safe. However, it seems the alarm only works when you connect to the same WIFI the safe is connected to, so be aware of that. While neat, I don’t have much use for the app. 

Yay or Nay 

For the price, it’s a fairly robust and well-made safe. I’ve opened it hundreds of times, and my youngest kiddo still gets a kick out of the idea that my fingerprint opens it. He’s bummed his fingerprints don’t work, but that’s the way it’s gotta be. 

The safe currently pulls duty at my wife’s work from home desk, and we programmed her fingerprints along with mine. This way, she has quick access to her Walther in case something goes bump in the day. She can bump back quickly but can also keep her gun secured. You can check it out here if the little K5 speaks to you. 

Gunday Brunch 67: How to Spot a Bad Instructor

Annette Evans of Own Her Own is back this week to talk about red flags in the instructor community, and how to tell if your instructor might not be the best.

Cash n’ Go instruction is unfortunately still a problem in the industry as trainers with very shallow backgrounds, limited knowledge, and often dangerous misconceptions about the right way as they’re convinced of their own weapons handling supremacy make flashy SEO strong sales pitches. They do well on the ads so they get the business but they’re selling snake oil at the end of the day and promising safety for the trade.

It’s hard to verify instructors, relatively speaking, in the pay per review era. Reliance on non-qualified reviewer experiences is also of highly limited value. But it is doable and something you should do, just as you should for any lifesaving field like first aid, before investing a not insubstantial sum of money and time into their hands.

Stretching the M16’s Legs: 9-Hole M16A2 Practical Accuracy

The M16A2 is the rifle I grew up on, as it were. I learned drill, maintenance, and marksmanship upon it in the halls of MCRD San Diego and Camp Pendleton. It was a well worn, more purple than black, absolutely abused and put away wet rifle.

And it worked.

Well.

The M16A2 was several brilliant and simple concepts pulled together into a solid rifle.

It had flaws, certainly. The stock was too long for most users, especially in armor. The burst fire trigger was a hot garbage invention that made bean counters happy and riflemen sad, trigger break weight was gritty and unpredictable. But rifle worked. It shot and it hit what you shot it at if you did it right, consistently, out to 500 yards.

With. Iron. Sights.

It was the step away from the dependable rudimentary A1 that took new ammunition and a new take on sights to expand the effective range envelope of the light 5.56 rifles.

The Army was grumpy about the change too, and I find that amusing. The stock A2 is obsolescent today but could be pressed into service rather effectively (better than the poor schmucks getting mosins in Ukraine).

Enjoy the vid, make sure you like it over on YouTube also and hit up SlateBlackIndustries.com

Core Vision Training: Teaching You Preparedness

Train to a standard, then tighten that standard

An area of increasing concern for all of us is the occupied home invasion, which can be defined as an incident where the family occupies the house, and they are confronted with an imminent lethal threat by one or more intruders.

Recently, the number of reported violent encounters inside the home has increased. These violent encounters aren’t even limited to your home anymore. You could be thrust into a violent encounter when shopping at a mall or even walking to your car afterward.

This growing concern has prompted a surge of new gun owners who intend to keep that newly purchased firearm for the primary purpose of home defense. Additionally, many states have adopted constitutional carry where gun owners now don’t need to attend any training to carry concealed.

There is a void in the training industry regarding preparing for violent encounters, at least in the context of home defense. Core Vision Training has stepped into that void in a big way.

Why Spend The Money and Time on Training

Self-defense, home defense, and other preparedness training are necessary to effectively defend yourself, your family, and your home when targeted by crime or violence. There will always be criminals who want to take what isn’t theirs and predators who want to hurt the innocent. When you train to become more proficient in these skills, you gain the tools to stand your ground and live to see another day.

As with any training courses you attend, you want to ensure it fits your context of use and goals. However, many “tactical” training courses claim to train students in the art of fighting with a pistol and rifle, room clearing within your home, and a host of other “tacticool” courses. 

Many courses people attend for the experience rather than for learning life-saving skills. Nevertheless, teaching these concepts takes days to execute correctly with the proper instructor cadre.

Core Vision Training employs instructors with proven operational experience, some of which are still operational, which gives you the most up-to-date relevant training available.

Core Vision Training promo picture

Why Choose Core Vision Training

Core Vision Training is the top self-defense training company and facility in the Pacific Northwest. Their instructors bring decades of relevant operational experience to provide their clients with the highest quality training possible.

In addition to their premier courses, they also offer a monthly membership program. By signing up for the recurring monthly membership, individuals who have taken any form of our Structure Assessment courses now have the opportunity for additional reps and recurring training to maintain and master the skills they acquired in our classes.

Recurring training covers medical, structure assessment, teamwork, land navigation, live fire, vehicle work, and several more.

Let’s take a quick look at a few of their premier courses.

Core Vision: Structure Assessment Active Defense Course

If you are unlucky enough to find yourself in a fight with an armed assailant, learning to load and clear a malfunction is far easier if you are familiar with that weapon or type of weapon ahead of time. This is something you won’t want to figure out on the fly.

Imagine fighting your attacker in a dark parking lot or inside your home, and gaining control of his loaded weapon, only to die because you didn’t know how to operate the safety.

When you become skilled with your primary defensive tool, learn to use other weapons. Clint Smith said it best “There’s nothing that says you are going to fight with just your gun.”

The Core Vision Training Structure Assessment courses prepare you for just that. The Active Defense course, which is a combination of the home defense course and trauma training, is tailored to the everyday citizen looking to sharpen their skills and better protect their family.

WHAT’S COVERED

  • 1 & 2 person structure assessment
  • CCW Pistol mechanics & manipulations
  • Link up procedures
  • Casualty assessment and treatment
  • Call up procedures for 911
  • Center fed, corner fed rooms & hallways
  • Positive Threat Identificatio
Self Defense training session
Active Defense Course

Core Vision: Vehicle Escape Concepts

Let’s look at a different type of EDC; your Every Day Car. This is your daily driver, whether a Honda Civic or a Rolls Royce.

When you leave the safety of your home and get into your vehicle to take kids to school, pick up passengers, or go to the store, it becomes your mobile command center.

When you get behind the wheel of your vehicle, think of yourself as the Transporter. It’s not only an excellent movie but highlights some key points. Such as how he maintains driving the car and moves within and around the confines of his vehicle. Everything is done professionally and with a purpose.

The Core Vision Training Vehicle Escape Concepts course teaches you to be ready for a fight in and around your vehicle. Everything they teach you is done professionally and with a practical purpose.

WHAT’S COVERED

  • Avoidance
  • Preparation
  • Movement within and out of a vehicle
  • What is and is not cover on a vehicle
  • Gear & Equipment Preparation
  • Vehicle Considerations
Core Vision Training vehicle escape class
Vehicle Escape Concepts

Core Vision: Land Navigation

When many of us first enlisted, there was no handheld GPS to tell us where we were and how to reach our destination. Instead, we had to learn how to use a compass and protractor with our maps. Land Navigation courses were taught with the old school military issue Lensatic compasses and a map whether it was daytime or night-time.

The use of a compass is a perishable skill, much like shooting. It requires practice. Nowadays, we have wrist-mounted GPS units, handheld units, and smartphones that provide us with navigational aids. But what if the batteries run out or your GPS gets submerged and shorts out? Now what? How do you get back home? Do you have a backup method of navigation?

The Core Vision Training land navigation course teaches you how to read and orient a map and navigate using a compass so that you make it back home safely. The two available courses are Intro To Land Navigation and Basic Map Reading.

WHAT’S COVERED

  • How to read and orient a map
  • How to familiarize yourself with a map using a compass
  • Individual Pace Count
  • Dead Reckoning & Terrain Association
  • How to identify significant terrain features
  • How to identify minor terrain features
  • How to read contour lines
  • How to plot locations on a map
Land Nav class in session
Land Navigation

In the end, the time you invest in training for an event that may never occur is your responsibility. The flip side of that is if that event ever does happen, do you want to be the one who lets your spouse and children down?

We encourage you to reflect on the cost of your personal decisions and how you choose to spend your time and money. Remember, when seconds count, law enforcement is minutes away, and a lot can happen in that time. You can lose your whole world in those few minutes.

If you are ready to accept that risk, that’s on you. But, if you believe your life and the lives of your loved ones are worth every ounce of your effort, train like it. Train like they matter. Train with Core Vision Training.

For more information, you can find them on Instagram and Facebook.

Lee-Enfields: Proto-Modular Military Rifles

Featured Image: A pair of No.4 Mk.1 Lee-Enfields. Notice the butt socket directly underneath the bolt knobs.

The Lee-Enfield rifle, Britain’s last true gun of Empire, was designed in the late 19th century by James Paris Lee. Like many of the emerging bolt-action battle rifles of the period, early variants made their debut during the conflicts of the early part of the 20th century.

By the First World War, the current iteration of the rifle was known as the No.1 SMLE (Short Magazine Lee Enfield), and this particular model made Lee-Enfields a known entity. Lee-Enfield rifles were primarily chambered for the .30-caliber .303 British rifle cartridge dating back to the late 1880s. The .303 British cartridge is old enough to have been loaded with black powder for use with the forerunner of the Lee-Enfield rifle, the Lee-Metford rifle.

Like many cartridges of that time period, it is rimmed and its casing had generous tapering. The SMLE and its Second World War younger brother, the No.4 rifle, were both the UK and Commonwealth primary infantry rifles until the 7.62mm NATO L1A1 FALs eventually replaced them along with the .303 British cartridge.

Lee-Enfields always had certain quirks about them: mechanically, visually, and otherwise. For example, the SMLE is arguably one of the most recognizable infantry battle rifles, as it has this reinforced front sight protector and muzzle cap which makes it look like a hog snout. The silhouette of a British “Tommy” with his Brodie and SMLE in hand is probably one of the most iconic aspects of the 20th century British Military.

For starters, this was probably the first bolt action rifle to use a two position thumb safety (made popular by the Remington 700 design), albeit the safety on Lee-Enfields is on the “wrong side.”

Whereas other bolt-action rifles of the period typically had a five cartridge capacity, the Lee-Enfield held ten. Whereas most of those rifles also had internal box magazines, Lee-Enfields had detachable box magazines instead. (It should be noted that contemporary military doctrine expected soldiers to charge their rifles with stripper clips and not swap magazines. However it can be argued that a bolt-action rifle with a detachable magazine was quite forward thinking for its time). Whereas those other rifles had actions that cocked-on-opening, the Lee-Enfield had a cock-on-close action that could be cycled more quickly.

Since 1909 British soldiers took part in a shooting drill known as the “Mad Minute” where a minimum of fifteen rounds had to hit a 300 yard target. Due to the angle and placement of the action, expert marksmen were able to shoot nearly twice the amount of rounds by using the palm of their hand and along with the smoothness of its cock-on-closing action. Unlike virtually any other period bolt-action rifle, Lee-Enfields had a threaded bolt head that screwed right into the bolt body. Screw-on bolt heads were possible in part because the rifle was designed to lock into the receiver with the main part of the bolt body. This freed up the bolt head from bearing any extra pressure. It also helps that the .303 British cartridge was not known to be a high pressure rifle round either.

Different and interchangeable sized bolt heads meant that armorers could conveniently mix and match suitable parts with regard to proper headspacing: a century old approach to modularity in bolts.

The bolt body, 10-round magazine, and screw-on bolt head of a No.4 Mk.1 rifle

Not surprisingly, Lee-Enfield receivers themselves are different than the receivers of their contemporaries. Besides the main part of the receiver that cradles the action, Lee-Enfield receivers have a circular disk shaped protrusion at the lower rear extremity of the receiver and right above the trigger and trigger guard. This “disk” separates the rear buttstock from the forestock in front of the action; model and serial number information is typically stamped on this part of the rifle.

Not surprisingly, this protrusion is called a butt-socket as Lee-Enfield buttstocks screw directly into them. The manner in which a Lee-Enfield stock attaches to the butt-socket is not dissimilar to the way most shotgun stocks screw into the back of their receivers. While this isn’t remarkable today, a century ago an armorer could fit four different standard stocks that were all sized differently to any Lee-Enfield rifle in order to adjust the length of pull for a given soldier’s rifle. This avoided the issue of the entire British fighting force having to make do with a one-size-fits all rifle stock.

Changing an individual stock is a far cry from the adjustability afforded by an AR-15 receiver extension with a SOPMOD stock. However, it still demonstrates a level of progressive and modular firearms design that was definitely not yet the norm the way it is nowadays. To keep things in context, the Lee-Enfield family of rifles as a whole is an example of modular innovation from a time when the internal combustion engine and aircraft were in their infancy, along with things such as indoor electricity and lighting.


The RMSx – Mini But Big

It’s rare that a modern gun is too small for a red dot optic. You really have to go below the pocket pistol-sized gun to really exclude the use of red dots. The red dot revolution ripped across the land and spread to guns both big and small. A British company called Shield was the first to create a commercially successful micro red dot designed for the single stack 9mm and micro-compact market, and it was actually a rifle sight ala RMR piggybacking ACOG prior to that. The Shield RMSc set the standard footprint all the little guns use today. Shield innovated once, and they’ve recently done so once more with the Shield RMSx. 

Little guns have little optics with little windows. It’s not a huge problem, and little optics with little windows keep the gun nice and small.

With that said a bigger window can be very nice. Companies like Leupold and SIG certainly try their hardest to produce optics with giant windows. A big window might not matter to top-tier shooters, but for us mere mortals, a nice big window allows you to mess up. 

The Shield RMSx provides a massive window. Way bigger than any other micro red dot on the market. If your pistol has a Shield footprint, specifically the RMSc, then the RMSx provides a massive window about 80% larger than a standard Shield RMSc

Into the Shield RMSx 

The Shield RMSx is built for competition, according to the website, and it does lack some features your modern tactical shooter might want. For example, it’s auto adjust only, and there is no on and off. When put away in the dark, the dot dims to nothing and effectively turns it off. The battery is mounted through the bottom of the unit, and the whole thing has to be removed to swap the battery. 

Additionally, the lens is made of polymer. That’s mostly okay, glass is preferred, and the Shield RSMc now has a glass option.

The main problem with polymer is that it tends to scratch easier, but for a deep concealed gun, this isn’t likely to be a big problem. In Shield’s defense, they do advertise the RMSx as a competition optic. 

This little fella weighs .617 of an ounce and does have an aluminum body. The dot brightness is night vision compatible, and the highest setting claims it works in the brightest of light. The battery will last 2 to 3 years, depending on the average use. The reticle is either 4 or 8 MOA. 

Also, the optic is designed and built in the United Kingdom. 

The Big Little RMSx 

My go-to for my carry gun has been the Holosun 507K on my P365XL. I popped the 507K off to give the RMSx a little run. Immediately the big window and the brilliantly clear lens were a major positive. I greatly enjoyed the big view window. I mentioned prior that a top-tier shooter doesn’t likely need a bigger window, their presentation covers it. However, a bigger window gives you a little leeway on your presentation and makes tracking the dot faster. 

Being able to find the dot means you can get the dot on target faster and make target transitions faster. It’s easy to get your gun going and put more lead on your target with less time required. This specific window is massive and makes it easy to get behind and find the dot. 

It surprised me, and while I didn’t notice a huge difference in the time, I did find the optic to be more intuitive to use and loved looking through the massive clear window. The border of the RMSx is plenty thin and allows you a nice, almost uninterrupted view of your sight picture. 

Tossing Lead 

The 4 MOA dot on my RMSx is crisp, easy to see, and a nice perfect little dot. It’s the perfect size to be eye-catching and easy to see. The auto adjustment of the RMSx is spot on. It gets super bright in the brightest conditions the Florida sun throws at us. My main problem with an auto-adjusting dot is how it adjusts when mixed with a handheld or weapon light. Oftentimes it gets washed out once the light pops on. 

I used a 1,000-lumen ASP light in a dark room to test the auto adjustment, and was impressed. I started with the light off, capable of seeing the dot. Then I hit the light, and the dot adjusted faster than I could comprehend. It spun right up without complaint. 

The optic comes with an Allen key and a little dial to allow you to measure your adjustments and guide you in the right direction. The adjustments are tactile, and you can feel and hear them.  

At the range, the little optic held zero, and over a few hundred rounds proved its willingness to serve. The big window really showed its strength when it came time to shoot with one hand, both dominant and non-dominant shooting. That’s where I’m really sloppy, and the big window made such a big difference in finding the dot between shots and scoring solid hits when needed. 

Is Bigger Better? 

If I was a better shooter, maybe bigger wouldn’t be better, but I’m not, so it is. The little extra leeway it gives is very nice, especially with a small gun. The downside is that your gun is a little bit bigger. I would prefer a glass lens on top of manual adjustments, but this might be the biggest optic possible for small guns, and there is something to be said for that ratio. 

It’s not for everyone, but it’s for me, and I think the RMSx is a solid choice in the micro compact market.