Illinois is a bastion of firearms freedoms, as we all well know, so it is not surprising to find out that the proposed ‘Fix the FOID’ act wants to add a fingerprints requirement to the identity data the state collects on persons wanting to exercise their civil rights.
Illinois State Police said Aurora shooter Gary Martin slipped through the cracks by lying on his application for a FOID card, and because Illinois does not have a fingerprinting requirement, the system missed his 20-year-old conviction for stabbing a former girlfriend in Mississippi. – CBS Chicago
If the ISP had just had his fingerprints there is NO WAY he would have had a gun… Minus the fact he already illegally had the gun and the state was the entity that failed by issuing the FOID.
Very few states have fingerprints as a state requirement for ownership. Carry, yes, but not ownership. Federally anyone looking to purchase an NFA item also must submit updated prints to the ATF.
The Fix the FOID fingerprint submission is not an unheard of requirement. Nor is it particularly burdensome with technology like Livescan. But assuring us that if this particular requirement had been in place that Aurora wouldn’t have happened seems like a stretch… I would hazard that there were other factors involved beyond fingerprints.
The addition of fingerprint data isn’t the only issue up in the act. Raising the tax for ownership ID by 500% is also. Yes, raising the tax… on a civil right… by 500%. I’m certain making it more expensive will help with that homicide clearance rate as those funds will undoubtedly be slated to combat ‘gun violence’. That’s usually the line they sell the tax increase with at any rate, and besides it only affects those crazy gun owners who dare to own guns legally. Fix the FOID now looks like a money grab from this angle.
According to data obtained by CBS 2, in 2018 3,429 cards were revoked in Cook County, but 39% of those cards were never actually returned.
You mean to say that people didn’t want to return their access to arms? Color me shocked! Shocked I say! But how would Fix the FOID change that non-compliance rate? Are those 3,429 revocations based on a background check in error? Would fingerprints have corrected those errors? None of that data is stated although the correlation is implied to bolster an argument for fingerprinting. In reality that number likely represents total revocations for all reasons, including expirations and criminal conduct. Very few of those are likely a revocation based on a background check error, and fewer of that subset would be corrected by having fingerprints on file.
The “Fix the FOID” Act passed out of committee Tuesday. It is poised for a vote in the House. The Senate would have to sign off before it goes to the governor’s desk.
The Memorial Day weekend sale is live at Aero Precision. If you’ve been looking for parts to finish a build, upgrade a build, or just finished a build and need parts for the next one…
AR15/M4E1 and M5E1 Completion kits are on sale. M4 and M5 upper receiver sets with and without handguards. Combinations to get you everything you need. Pricing it out quick, every part for a 16″ .308 build would be about $865 minus a stock, pistol grip, charging handle, and trigger of end user choice. No wasted spend.
Having just finished two more builds here at the office the M4E1 and M5E1 distinguish themselves as of the highest quality user friendly systems to build your custom platform. An 11.3 (my CEO’s gun) and my 12.5 have been added to our AR inventory. The builds were the smoothest and least profanity filled I’ve completed to date (no build is profanity free) and the final products are exactly the systems we wanted.
Home defense or truck gun pistols. Duty grade rifles. Precision hunting or PRS rigs. The Aero Precision platform gives an extensive level of user direction and compatibility with the build’s end goal, the attention to detail at the manufacturing level contribute to end user success with no corners cut. It’s the little things, like the threaded bolt catch and integral winterized trigger guard, that make the process smoothest from delivery to test fire. Whether you run an ATLAS, an Enhanced, or torque on a Geissele or Midwest rail the system supports the end user, the whole process is about efficiently delivering the final rifle you want.
While kicking off summer you can kick off or round out the next project. I feel like that is the American way of things.
I had a fantastic experience on a Spring Gobbler hunt recently. I’ve only turkey hunted twice before – once last year with a mentor, and one attempt by myself last year which I wrote about here.
The hunt was an experiment and was limited to four women including myself. We stayed in a rented vacation cottage and hunted on a Friday morning and Saturday morning, with guides to call for us and advise us.
We met up Thursday night at the cottage and had a get-to-know-you “girl evening” the night before our hunt so we could go over details. These were all women who had done hunts with Calibered Events or some other manner of hunting before. It turned out to be a really fun group. We had a short evening though as we needed to get to bed for our pre-dawn wake-up call.
Our first hunt day started with a wake-up alarm at 4 am with the goal of being in the blind no later than 5:30 AM. We broke our group of four women hunters up into two groups, with two gals going with each guide to blinds on different areas of the property. I went with Sarah and property owner Don as our guide. The other gals went with Calibered Events hunting guru Ann Marie.
Our blind was located in some upper fields that were at about 3000 ft of elevation in the mountains of Western Maryland. Spring was still getting a foothold up there. It was beautiful.
After driving through several pasture gates near the top of the mountain, we left the truck and walked the rest of the way around the field to our blind. We used headlamps to light our way in the darkness. The 8-man pop-up blind was like the freaking Blind-Mahal. The thing was HUGE. There was plenty of elbow room for three adult hunters, chairs and gear and even room to get up and move around.
While our guide set up the decoys we gals got settled and I loaded up my camo-wrapped Benelli M2 12-ga former 3-Gun shotgun.
My Benelli M2 dressed up in camo.
The distant gobbles started almost immediately at dawn. It was so exciting to hear these wild birds answer the calls from our guide!
Shortly after dawn, we heard distant shots, and after an interminable wait, were informed via text that one of the gals in the other group had shot her first gobbler! Reportedly, a couple gobblers came in fast on them, intending to kick around the jake decoy that was set out. But one of those Toms got a surprise he wasn’t looking for!
From our blind there were several gobblers visible on a hill in a far field, maybe 600 yards away. They would answer back, but they would not come over to our field. That part was a little frustrating, but even just that interaction was exciting for me. This was already more “action” than I had in my previous two turkey hunts combined! There was near constant calling back and forth for quite awhile, but ultimately those Toms wandered off in a different direction and left our decoys – probably to pursue real hens.
Things were quiet then for over an hour, but it was so pleasant listening to the various birds calling in the trees behind us. There were whippoorwills, and brown thrashers, woodpeckers, crows, and even a few geese and ducks flying overhead.
BUT then a single hen came in alone. She wandered in from our right (opposite from where all the gobbling had been). She checked out our decoys and listened to Don calling, but she ultimately moved on. She did not have any gobblers nosing after her either, much to our disappointment. Don thought she might have had a nest nearby.
That was the extent of our action for the first day, but it was SO interesting! Our guide was a font of information about turkey hunting. I learned much more about nesting and breeding habits than I had ever known previously.
When it was getting close to noon and the end of shooting hours, we headed back to our rental cabin and then on to the taxidermist to get our successful hunter Lauren’s prize mounted.
Lauren and her first gobbler.
On the second morning the was zero activity despite frequent calling for the first few hours. It was so different than the previous day when there were gobbles almost from the first break of dawn. But we finally saw a head pop up over the rise and slowly approach us – without a sound. That bird said not a word – it was crazy. We thought it was a hen at first. In fact we thought it might have been the same hen we saw the previous day who was just backtracking along the same route.
But when I handed my binoculars over to our guide, he said he thought he saw a little beard, and then confirmed that the head was red and there was definitely at least a 5 inch beard!
That bird went from hen to little jake to longbeard in the space of about three minutes. That was when the mad scramble started. My teammate Sarah and I were scrambling around like clowns at the circus trying to get into position for a shot. We had been relaxed and just watching because we thought it was a hen, but then WHAAAAH!!! I don’t know how that bird didn’t hear us panic whispering to eachother and getting ready.
Don tried his best to call that gobbler in, but that bugger didn’t make a peep and was starting to side-step us to the right. He wasn’t gobbling, he wasn’t strutting, he was just feeding and hanging out in the wisps of sorghum left after the winter.
Our guide thought he was out about 40 yards, and thought we should try to take a shot – both of us. My chair was too low and we were facing uphill, so even though I did have a shooting stick, my body position needed to be out of the chair and in a half crouch – not sitting, not kneeling, but not fully standing either. It was not an ideal or terribly stable shooting position but I did my best.
Sarah and I both took our shots simultaneously. Our guide said he thought he saw a feather or two float away, but then the gobbler was airborne – and gosh was he pretty! I used my second shell trying to lead him like a giant pheasant but missed him as I ran out of room in the blind window and he flew off into the woods to our right and behind us.
We thought in retrospect that the timid gobbler was eyeing our Tom decoy and keeping his distance. In Don’s words, “I think that guy has gotten his ass kicked a few times and was being cautious.” We had a good laugh over that one, but the experience taught me even more about turkey behavior.
Afterwards, we thought it might be nice to have those few feathers for a souvenir, but when we got out there at the end of the morning, we couldn’t find them. When Don paced off the actual distance, it was 58 yards – much farther than we had thought. So I didn’t feel so bad about the miss. Knowing that, I’m just glad we didn’t cripple him. When he was airborne he proved to be a lot bigger than he looked on the ground.
But we had our story to tell and that Tom lived to gobble another day. What a heart-pounding experience! I saved my two spent shells as a souvenir of the day.
The shells I used to miss my first turkey.
During the next lull, Don helped me work on my calls a bit. He roughened up the glass side of my call and gave me a wood striker to use as my fiberglass one wasn’t working very well.
I had practiced an assembly call, but even so, I wasn’t very “fluent”. In fact we joked that I was probably speaking “Turkey French”. Then that started a cascade of jokes about a gobbler being like Skunk Lothario Pepe le Pew – “Where you go, my Leetle French Love?” I had to keep from laughing too loud. There was no fun at all in our blind – nope, none.
The call I used to speak “Turkey French”.
We heard more distant gobbles through the morning, but could not get anybody to come even as close as that last one had come, so when noon rolled around we were again empty-handed. But I was certainly not empty-hearted.
I learned much more in those two mornings than I had in the entire previous season – mostly because there’s only so much you can read about. You reach a point where you simply have to EXPERIENCE.
The changing conditions on the top of those hills, and the turkeys’ reaction to it was a real education. In those two mornings of hunting we saw sprinkling rain, sun and blue sky, rolling fog and dropping temps. It’s funny that the hen we saw showed up during the sprinkles rather than the sunshine. And it was really interesting how that Tom didn’t make a single peep the whole time he was around our decoys. I learned so much, and I would definitely do this again!
This was the first time this hunt has been offered by Calibered Events and Wild Wings Hunting Preserve. I think they were a bit worried how we four women would react if we didn’t bring home a turkey. Unlike a released pheasant hunt, these are wild birds and there is no predicting behavior from one day to the next. There were NO guarantees. But it proved to be an AWESOME experience!
That’s the nature of hunting though. You have to be able to enjoy the entire experience, because you aren’t guaranteed a harvest. Wild animals are unpredictable. Although getting up at 4 AM two mornings in a row wasn’t my favorite part, that was what allowed me to experience the dawn, the birds waking up, the mist rising off the fields, and all of the intangibles that make hunting the almost spiritual thing that it is for me.
Many thanks to Ann Marie Foster of Calibered Events, and Don and Lisa Calhoun of Wild Wings Hunting Preserve for a memorable experience! I hope they decide to offer this opportunity again next year!
[Ed: The conclusion of the piece begun on Tuesday.]
What lessons emerge from the pattern of such incidents, of which we’ve mentioned but four in vignette only?
First, is that if one party means to impose its will upon members of another party the former must effectively disarm the latter. Such has been done successfully in diverse cultures throughout the world. Overall, the results have too often been tragic. American gun owners have learned the lesson.
Second, those who stand up for themselves have some chance of prevailing over an apparently overwhelming force. Douglass succeeded, as did the whole mass of Black Americans later, notwithstanding that they have always been a minority. The man prepared to die to defend his rights is the more formidable combatant when facing a tyrant who would prefer to live a comfortable life.
Third, men are not always entirely rational. Douglass was pushed beyond his tolerance. He had every reason to expect to be whipped to death; still, he would die on his feet, not on his knees. The Sioux had no rational expectation of defeating their white militia opponents, let alone regular troops. Southern secessionists failed to judge their inability to export their cotton and tobacco produce to finance a protracted war. They could successfully smuggle guns, power and shot; they just couldn’t pay for them.
Fourth, when men fail at discourse, debate and diplomacy, the consequences are devastating. We will never know the number of slaves who were whipped to death. When a minority is so powerless as to be treated contemptibly then contempt will work its coercive effect until there is no way forward but to sink or swim.
The course of gun control has taken diverse paths in various nations throughout history. It took a century for the Parliament to disarm and emasculate the loyal subjects of the United Kingdom. There is now no effective impediment to smuggling or cottage manufacture of guns. Today, Englishmen won’t even protect their daughters from sexual slavery to say nothing of self-defense. Their debate is now over cutlery control.
America is a different place. It took a century following the Civil War for Blacks to step up and demand a place at the table to insist upon their civil rights. American gun owners will not now sit by quietly as they are gradually divested of their enumerated Second Amendment rights. It would take far more than another century to accomplish that feat.
Gun owners are growing increasingly impatient with the contempt gun controllers heap on them. Former Attorney General Eric Holder once called for “brainwashing” people against guns. In the wake of the Parkland shooting major corporations withdrew their NRA member discount programs. Banks are withdrawing credit from Federal firearms licensees. Hollywood condemns gun ownership while profiting immensely on movies depicting shootings in exciting and glamorous scenes. All these Masters of the Universe demonetize and censor gun content.
New York Governor Andrew Cuomo and his Attorney General attack the NRA calling it an “extremist group”, claiming that its insurance indemnifies illegal acts, and trying to shut off its access to broad banking services. “Common sense” “gun safety” measures are perceived by rights advocates as expressions of contempt and subjugation—as Cuomo said, its defenders “have no place in the state of New York.” Even the ACLU sides with NRA in this.
I’d hazard the following prediction. Confrontation will not accomplish gun control–but neither will it end opposition to gun rights. Second Amendment advocates are most likely to find a strategy of collaboration effective.
In the theater of politics there are many constituencies, such as for: free speech; free press; religious freedom; freedom from unreasonable search and seizure; Black Lives Matter, Blue Lives Matter and all lives matter; defense of property rights; self-protective minorities and women; LGQBT activists who feel likewise; rational public health advocates; and so on. Any of these constituencies might logically make common cause with gun rights advocates.
This may produce strange dance partners. We will watch this choreography unfold on the stage of life, hoping for a better outcome than Civil War II.
.
.
—‘MarkPA’ is trained in economics, a life-long gun owner, NRA Instructor and Massad Ayoob graduate. He is inspired by our inalienable rights to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” and holds that having the means to defend oneself and one’s community is vital to securing them.
Ian over at Forgotten Weapons takes on a belt fed that most people have probably only seen in the digital space. The KAC LAMG, Knight’s Armament Company – Light Assault Machine Gun, is a continuation on KAC’s legacy of developing and modernizing systems from Eugene Stoner.
With origins back to the Stoner 63 system, the LAMG uses a “constant recoil system”. The lightweight machine gun doesn’t need a buffer to catch the back of the reciprocating bolt carrier. The recoil spring slows and returns the bolt over its full travel distance without delivering a jolt to the shooter.
From Knight’s Armament
The 5.56 variant weighs in at 9lbs unloaded and gives a rifleman in a fireteam belt fed suppression capability with a controllable rate of fire and an incredibly easy recoil impulse. Much lighter than an M249, the KAMG doesn’t compromise a teams maneuverability. It can still operate as a true automatic rifle and not as a machine gun.
The nature of both the 5.56 and 7.62 variants, as well as caliber derivatives of both those, is mobile and controllable squad firepower. They still have quick change barrels, low (for automatic, 600m) rates of fire that vastly improve accuracy and ammo conservation. It can operate in the spaces that the M240 and M249 operate and allow those heavier weapons to operate on platforms that their weight is not a detriment, vehicles and emplacements.
The LAMG is compatible with the full spectrum of optics, ancillaries, and even AR grips to grant the end user agency or branch an array of customization to fit their mission profiles. M-LOK for rails or direct attachment and a KAC heavy duty bipod keep the weapon fully inline with its support role.
The SIG P365 was quite the gun at SHOT 2018 and since then it’s been a massive success with numerous awards and thousands adopting it as their new EDC. The P365 is a sweet gun, it’s a striker fired 9mm that holds 10 rounds in a package that is the same size as most single stack 9mms that hold 6 rounds. The P365 was alone at the top, but it’s about to get a younger, but bigger brother. Osage County Guns released the first look at both the new SIG P365 XL and the new SIG Romero Zero optic.
The information comes from an alleged spec and sale sheet, so things may change prior to the gun being released to the public. We saw little hints this was coming when the Gun Mag Warehouse published a listing for a 15 round P365 magazine. Until now that just seemed to be a SIG extended mag. The P365 XL will feature a slightly longer barrel and longer grip frame.
Courtesy of Osage County Guns
The P365 XL will sport a 12 round flush magazine with a 15
round extended mag. The barrel grows from 3.1 inches to 3.7 inches. What looks
interesting is the fact that the frame’s dust cover looks to be the same length
as the standard P365. This may be hinting towards compatibility with the 3.1-inch
slide for a Glock 43X style gun.
Besides the longer barrel the gun is hosting a ton of new
features. This includes a flat faced trigger, an extended beavertail, a carry
magwell, and best of all an optic’s cut slide.
The P365 XL and Romeo Zero
The slide is compatible with the Shield RMSc optics, as well as the brand-new Romeo Zero optic. The Romeo Zero optic is smaller than miniature red dot. SIG likes their cover plates to integrate a rear sight, so it’s removed when you want to mount an optic.
Courtesy Osage County Guns
The Romeo Zero features an integrated rear sight, and it
appears as if the gun will naturally cowitness with the P365 XL iron sights. While
not confirmed I would love to see the standard P365 get an optic’s cut slide
model in the near future.
Release dates point to mid to late summer, and I’ve reached
out to SIG for comment, and additional details. Watch this space for updates.
9 Hole Reviews takes the AK 74, stock, to the range and stretches its legs. The results of their practical accuracy tests are telling. With iron sights in high wind the AK in 5.45×39 tells its naysayers precisely what it can do.
The 5.45×39 cleans the 150-500 yard course in 30 rounds, a feat very few rifles have been able to match. The “poison bullet” of the Soviet/Afghan conflict does what it does so well because it was designed to match or beat the range, accuracy, and lethality of the M16, just in the AK platform the soviets knew well by this point.
The rifles are accurate.
The shooter makes or breaks it.
I was using a 8.3″ barreled 5.56 AK variant out to 200 yards this past weekend and making my all day hits. 100 yard group with M193 was about 3-4 MOA over 30 rounds (three 10rd strings)
AKs run and they can take what you aim to hit. Like the FAL, the G3, and the M16A2 a stock AK is behind the modern curve ergonomically, but that doesn’t negate its base effectiveness.
Don’t believe me? Show us all wrong. Or perhaps learn something new.
Sentinel Concepts AK 47 in Alliance with Tom Alibrando of IWI and Steve ‘Yeti’ Fisher. Sign up here
This course is designed to teach the fundamentals of shooting the Tavor SAR and X95 rifle systems.
The bullpup design is advantageous as well as unique but requires some additional training to effectively employ the system under stress. Your instruction will be conducted by members of the law enforcement and special operations community.
*This course may require some moderate physical activity.
Core Topics
Core topics that will be covered include:
Ballistics
Function of the Tavor system
Cleaning and maintenance
Zeroing
Fundamentals of shooting
Shooting from various positions
Reloads
Malfunction clearance
Near and far target engagements
Turns and pivots
A case of ammo down range over the next two days and a refresh of fundamental rifle disciplines.
Low Light Critical Handgun Employment reintroduces you to your handgun while learning proper low light techniques and shooting proficiency in the dark.This class emulates the standard CHE program while further developing mental control, technical skill and decision making with the use of a weapons mounted and handheld light. Timed and graded drills and performance based task show you where your training is breaking down. Potential students absolutely must have prior vetted training to attend this course, students will be required to shoot a standards test at beginning of the class on demand.
[Ed: This is a piece rich in ideas and connections. It will be concluded on Thursday.]
Frederick Douglass was loaned out for a year to Edward Covey in 1833 “to be broken”. Prudent common-sense measures kept Blacks (slave and free) unarmed, or lightly armed at best. “If at any one time of my life more than another, I was made to drink the bitterest dregs of slavery, that time was during the first six months of my stay with Mr. Covey. . . I was somewhat unmanageable when I first went there, but a few months of this discipline tamed me. Mr. Covey succeeded in breaking me. I was broken in body, soul, and spirit.”
Eventually, Douglass ran away from Cohen, returning to his master, who sent him back to Cohen. Upon his return a fellow slave gave him a magical root to carry with him, said to protect him from beatings. The root seemed to work at first, until Covey attempted to tie Douglass. Without knowing “from whence came the spirit”, Douglass resolved to fight.
“We were at it for nearly two hours.” Cohen was a quick learner. “[A]t length he let me go, puffing and blowing at a great rate, saying that if I had not resisted, he would not have whipped me half so much. The truth was, that he had not whipped me at all. . . . The whole six months afterwards, that I spent with Mr. Covey, he never laid the weight of his finger upon me in anger. . . . This battle with Mr. Covey was the turning-point in my career as a slave. It rekindled the few expiring embers of freedom, and revived within me a sense of my own manhood.”
The Treasurer of the United States, preoccupied with the pressing demands of public finance in 1862, neglected to remit the annual Federal payment due the Sioux tribe. The Sioux had guns for hunting—not many, enough for sustenance. Mainly, they lived on credit from traders (at usurious rates) until the annual payment enabled them to clear their accounts and the cycle would begin another year. When the annuity was long overdue, credit was cut off. The most prominent trader, Andrew Jackson Myrick, allowed: “Let them eat grass, or their own dung.”
Relations between the Sioux and other Minnesotans varied from good to contemptuous; it depended upon the prejudices of each white settler. Ultimately, the annuity arrived a few days too late to head off an uprising.
Hostilities were sparked by an incident involving three hungry Indian hunters, three eggs, and their murder of one white farmer’s wife. The drive toward war promptly spun out of control, driven by Indian animosity precipitated entirely by white contempt and indifference. The atrocities on both sides were outrageous even by the standards of the day. They are far too gruesome to detail here.
Ultimately, the whites prevailed over the Sioux. A military commission sentenced 303 to death. Some trials, from gavel to gavel, stretched to 5 minutes. Because Lincoln commuted most of the sentences, the Army hanged just 38. Still, this was the largest mass execution in American history.
The Civil War was precipitated by battles for control over various Federal policies. Common sense decisions—e.g., to tax imports by Southerners to finance Northern infrastructure development—antagonized Southern whites. Finally, when Southern Congressmen had had enough, they walked out of deliberations and returned to their home states to confer withtheir constituents.
Imprudent decisions led to ill-conceived plans to attack the Federal fort at the port of Charleston and to maintain control of the isolated facility. Northern interests were unconscious of the fact that Southerners were armed, had the will to fight, and had the preponderance of military leadership skills. The North ultimately prevailed, but at the cost of 500,000 American lives—about 5% of the population. The physical plant of Southern cities and plantations was devastated and recovery took much of the following century.
The battle over the civil rights of freedmen and their descendants also unfolded slowly over the succeeding century. The war was followed by the loss of the Northern white, liberal interest that had been awakened by hostilities and remained fervent during the 12-year Reconstruction era. Only very gradually did the practice of lynching die-down after World War I.
Race relations stabilized sufficiently by the 1960s to allow for the emergence of a peaceful Civil Rights movement. “Peaceful” is too generous a word to apply without qualification. The white powers that prevailed—in state and municipal governments in the south—were determined to show the uppity Blacks that government intended to maintain its monopoly on the use of force. Whenever the show of force by uniformed officers was insufficient to maintain order, whites (sometimes draped in flowing color-matched robes) complemented government efforts.
America was fortunate that Black leadership judged that there was more to be gained by a rational appeal to classically liberal white Northerners; violence would not be prudent. But, pacifistic sentiment would easily turn in the face of violence precipitated against them.
Overt rhetoric advocating arming Blacks and their shows of force—e.g., by the Black Panthers—was successfully suppressed. (See the Mulford Act signed by then California Governor Ronald Reagan.) Nevertheless, Blacks did arm themselves in self-defense and regularly responded with violence when threatened by violence. The history of such efforts—most notably by the Deacons for Defense and Justice—has been carefully suppressed in the recounting of Black history.
. . . .
.
—‘MarkPA’ is trained in economics, a life-long gun owner, NRA Instructor and Massad Ayoob graduate. He is inspired by our inalienable rights to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” and holds that having the means to defend oneself and one’s community is vital to securing them. All DRGO articles by ‘MarkPA’
Welcome to Part 5 (and the Finale) of “A Pediatrician Builds Her Own AR”, or #soeasyapediatriciancandoit, brought to you by Aero Precision and Ballistic Advantage.
To recap previous installments, Part 1 of this series covered the ordering of parts and tools, Part 2 covered the receiving and preparation, Part 3 covered the Lower Build, and Part 4 covered the Upper build. The Finale today covers the test shoot and final thoughts.
If you’ve been following along, you’ll know that the upper build involved my Murphy moment “oops” which resulted in a bent gas key. The build was all finished except for waiting for a replacement BCG to arrive, so I had a bit of a lull. Once the replacement arrived however, I was ready for a range trip and a maiden voyage.
A couple gun club friends agreed to meet me at the range one evening last week for the test shoot. I wanted someone to inspect my work and to supervise me for safety’s sake, since I had never done a build before. I had planned on just using the Aero pop-up sights that I had, but one of those friends tends to buy-up parts on sale, so he had an assortment of scopes for me to try as well.
I received a great education on scopes and why some of them cost what they do, including some of the physics involved and also the difference between Chinese vs Phillipino vs Japanese glass. In the end he supervised my installation of the Aero lightweight scope base and Vortex Strike Eagle 1-8X24 that I chose from his collection.
I do not have any laser boresighting equipment. I usually just seat-of-the-pants it. But this is where having generous and helpful friends comes into play. That piece of laser technology saved me several rounds of ammo to get myself in the ballpark – without firing a single shot.
After the bore sighting I got to load up and fire the official first shot. I double -checked that the barrel was swabbed out and there were no obstructions, then loaded a single round of Black Hills Ammunition .308 Win Match 155gr Tipped Match King into the magazine.
While my friends backed-up and watched, I threw a towel over the receiver as instructed (to help deflect small debris in case of a problem?), lined up the scope and squeezed the trigger…
What a satisfying Bang! It worked perfectly! I was soooo tickled! I built this gun from parts – and it actually worked!!! What a rush!
The view from behind the scope
The felt recoil was not at all what I thought it would be – the VG6 Epsilon muzzle brake did its job. The fellows confirmed that there was a bit of an effect on bystanders though LOL.
After the test shot, then there was some scope tweaking on 100 yard steel, but we ran out of daylight before I could get photos of the dial-in on paper. I had to save that for another day.
Range Day 2
When I made it back to the range on a rainy Saturday, I was very pleased with my new M5’s performance. Once I got accustomed to the Geissele SSA-E trigger, I walked-in my scope at 50 yards until this was my six shot target.
Six shots at 50 yards
That was good enough to get me smacking 6 inch hanging steel at 200 yards.
Six inch hanging steel at 200 yards
I am no one’s idea of a precision shooter, so for me with a 1-8 scope that was pretty durn good. 200 yards is as far as my club range goes, so if I want to try anything farther, I’ll have to go somewhere else. For my purposes – deer and hogs – 200 yards is a very long shot for the terrrain I’ve hunted. Thus, I pronounce this gun “perfect” for the use I built it for! I am so tickled!!
Wrap-up
First, I am very grateful for everyone who helped me with this project and I am very proud of myself for learning how to do this rifle build. In retrospect, although it was intimidating at the start, it really wasn’t “that” difficult. What it took was a willingness to learn about the various parts and pieces, some reading (and watching videos) and learning what tools were needed for the job and why. Beyond that, it took some patience and some time and enough humility to ask for help when I was stuck.
There was some significant financial outlay, I won’t kid you about that. Apart from the obvious cost of the gun components themselves, the cost of tools (if you don’t already have them) can add up. That’s why as I mentioned in Part 1, it is quite reasonable to accumulate what you need a little at a time – either budgeted for yourself monthly or requested as gifts – and/or to borrow from supportive friends.
You would probably save-up for awhile to buy a factory-built AR 308, so you can approach a build the same way. The advantage to the build is that you can buy your components as you have the money and get that thrill every time when the parts boxes hits your front porch. That strings out the excitement for months before you actually start assembling!
Learning to do this was quite a bit outside of my usual life experience, but that doesn’t mean that one has to be a machinist or an engineer (or a man) to be able to acquire these skills. An average person with average mechanical ability can do this. Heck, during the week that I put together the lower, I also learned how to make sourdough. And that was in addition to my usual duties as a practicing physician.
Remember that Heinlein quote from Part 1? We are not insects. I did this. YOU can do this too. There is zero reason to be a one-trick-pony in life. Why not learn how to build your own gun? Aero Precision made it easy with quality parts.
I discovered that one of the great advantages to a build-it-yourself project like this is that I now have a much better understanding of the various parts of the gun and how they interact within the whole. That should serve me well in the future if I need to diagnose malfunctions. I might be able to more quickly narrow down the problem than I could have previously. Understanding “how” your firearms work can be as ultimately important as learning how to operate them safely.
Speaking of safety, I need to point out that I don’t have any illusions of being an actual gunsmith. I used my friends who do have those skills as resources to check my work before I proceeded to the test-firing. I suggest that if you are a novice like me, that you also use the resources of a qualified gunsmith to review your work when you are finished.
After this learning experience I can enthusiastically recommend Aero Precision and Ballistic Advantage if you are looking to try a home build of your own. The parts were of superb quality. There were no sharp edges, no burrs, no globs of cerakote, or any other imperfections. The holes always lined up exactly the way they were supposed to. Everything fit well with no issues, perfect machining.
I uttered minimal profanity and didn’t even throw anything in frustration. For a low frustration threshold person like me, that is saying something! With the exception of the heavy bench vice and the go/no-go gauges, I used all of my own tools. This is a do-able project for almost anyone with a willingness to learn the process.
I am exceedingly grateful to everyone who supported, advised, and encouraged me in this project. I owe my friends some shooting time and some dinner! This was a FANTASTIC learning experience and I can’t wait for hunting season!
So what are you waiting for? Get out there and build your own Aero Precision gun! If a middle-aged female pediatrician can do it – SO. CAN. YOU!
There is a little company called the Modern Warrior Project doing some big things in the tactical industry. I first found them due to their T1 Target and have followed them for quite some time. The Modern Warrior Project has since released a second target, an awesome reference guide, and now a massive report on Use of Force around the country. They post a ton of useful information on their Facebook page and they recently posted two training sessions designed to be short and sweet. One for rifles and one for pistols.
These shoots need minimal ammunition and are designed to exercise the basics of combat shooting with a handgun or rifle. The Modern Warrior Project design the rifle workout to utilize only 30 rounds and the handgun workout utilizes 50 rounds. These are designed for the Modern Warrior Targets. The T1 human target is for the handgun, and the multiple target T2 is for the rifle.
The Rifle Workout
I went with my new, and much beloved, M16A4 clone from Aero Precision. You’ll need 30 rounds, at least two magazines, and one mag pouch. I went with a belt mounted Wilder Tactical Pouch. The drills are shot at 21 feet and the use of the Multi Target T2 keeps things challenging. These different shaped targets are smaller and more challenging to hit at the short 21-foot distance.
The Drill Is As Follows
You start in a relaxed casual defensive posture. Each step of the drill has you firing one round into each of the targets. The T2 has ten smaller targets printed on it and each target will get three shots before the Workout is over. You’ll start with:
10 Side Steps 5 to the left and 5 to the Right
I simply alternated between left and right steps and fired at the target in the opposite direction of where I was stepping. It was simple but effective. This drill is partially snapshot and partially moving. It surprised me just how difficult this was to do with speed. I stepped and drove the weapon to a firing position at the same time. I quickly learned to take my time and make accurate shots rather than fast ones. Speed will come with time, but accuracy is forever.
7 Emergency Reloads
Emergency reloads are done when you are completely empty and you need to fix that… now. You disregard magazine retention and allow it to fall and reload as quickly as possible. Practicing mag reloads is something I do all the time so I felt confident and quick here. Bolt locked back on an empty magazine, reload, fire an accurate shot and you’re done.
3 Tactical Reloads
A tactical reload is done when there is a ‘lull’ in the fight and you have time to reload. If you aren’t moving you should be shooting, if you aren’t shooting you should be reloading, so on and so forth. This reload has you retaining the magazine and loading with a ‘full’ magazine. I started the 3 reloads with a round in the chamber and each magazine has one round loaded into it. This is a valuable skill for police and military shooters. The retention of magazines is critical and they can provide a refreshed source of ammo.
8 Immediate Action Malfunctions
Tap, rack, bang baby. I started with an empty chamber and with a magazine with one round loaded. Quick and simple, and very effective. Modern Warrior Project designed these for new shooters so let’s explain what tap, rack, bang is. TAP: The act of firmly striking the bottom of the magazine to assure it is locked and seated correctly to feed rounds into the gun. RACK: Running the guns action manually via the charging handle or slide to cycle out possible malfunctioned ammunition and load a fresh round from the properly seated magazine. BANG: Reacquire sights, check for continued validity of the target, and then attempting to fire if necessary.
2 Remedial Action Malfunctions
When tap rack back doesn’t work you have to make things more complicated. Attempt to place the weapon on safe, remove the magazine, retain it. Now you want to pull the bolt back to the rear and observe the chamber. If necessary lock the bolt, clear the malfunction and then reload and start firing once more. This is an invaluable drill and should be done slowly and carefully.
Modern Warrior Rifle Workout
The Modern Warrior Rifle workout is designed to be simple and easy for most shooters. It’s perfect for beginners and exercises important skills necessary for effective rifle employment. The Modern Warrior rifle workout is quick and requires very little equipment. It’s perfect for shooters of all skill levels and reinforces important skills every shooter should have.
The Modern Warrior Pistol Workout
The Modern Warrior pistol workout is also a simple set of drills designed to exercise the basics of combat handgun skills. The drill needs a box of ammo, a magazine pouch, two magazines, a T1 Target and is shot at 15 feet.
The drill starts with:
10 Draws to Full Extension
I carry concealed so I ran the drill from concealment. Drawing and firing can be tricky and should be practiced dry first. Make sure your finger stays off the trigger until the gun is on target. Draw, fire a shot to the chest, but remember not to immediately reholster. Keep your gun on target to build good habits and not training scars.
10 Side-Step Into Draws 5 left and 5 right
This is much more challenging than a standard draw and fire. You want to be able to draw and sidestep at the same time. By the time you are done moving you want your gun to be on target. Start dry and start slow. Move with a purpose, and with confidence. Practice both drawing and moving at the same time. Take your time and be accurate, speed will come with time.
6 Emergency Reloads
Start with your slide locked to the rear and go into a full presentation. Simulate firing your last round and go into an emergency reload. Let your magazine drop and reload as fast as possible, fire one round into the target. This is simple, but a lot of fun. Especially once you start seeing speed.
4 Tactical Reloads
As we talked about above the Modern Warrior Project is big on tactical reloads and they are an important skill to have. I left a round in the chamber and reloaded with 1 round in each magazine. Tactical reloads are trickier with a handgun, but here is where having big hands helped me. I pocketed the magazine to retain it. I got to a full presentation and fired a round to end the drill.
8 Immediate Action Drills
Simple and easy. This is a tap rack bang drill with a handgun. I kept one round in the magazine and the chamber empty.
2 Remedial Action Drills
This is when Tap Rack Bang doesn’t work. It’s simple enough and all you need to do is eject the magazine, retain it, and clear the chamber. Reinsert the magazine, chamber a round, and get to shooting once more.
5 Headshots and 5 Pelvic Area shots.
This is a fun way to end the drill and is simple enough. Fire 5 rounds into the respective areas. I practiced being as accurate as possible, producing the smallest possible group.
The Modern Warrior Workout: Comments
The pistol is similar to the rifle in many respects. It exercises safety and the basics when it comes to gun handling. It’s challenging, but fun and exercises a variety of essentials. Both workouts are quick and easy to do. Their focus on fundamentals makes them accessible for shooters both new and experienced. They are a quick and simple plan that makes efficient use of your range time, especially when time and ammo are short. They also highlight what you can work on, which is critical for continued skill development.
It’s also something you can do on a budget. I keep a 300 Blackout upper around and ammo is pricey for it, but I can get a 30 round workout and learn something without breaking the bank.
That’s why workout is such a good name for them. It expresses what these drills are in an easy to digest manner most people can relate to activities outside of guns. They are also tiresome. Maybe it was just because it’s May in Florida and it’s already in the 90s temperature wise with 75% humidity.
Doing both drills left me drenched in sweat and in many ways whipped. Not so much that I was physically tired, but mentally I felt spent. Moving from vastly different drills with two platforms in a short period of time had my mind running. It’s an interesting dynamic if you can practice both workouts in the same day.
They are effective, simple, and efficient. At the end of the day that is a winning combination.
There has been a lot of hype surrounding Glock this year with several new or upgraded models like the Gen5 17, 19, 26, model 45, 43x, and 48. The G45 caught my attention specifically. Why you ask? Well, the look of it to start with. But let me go back just bit.
Glock 17M and Gen5, Origin Story.
I was very intrigued with what Glock came up with to win the FBI contract. Was it a completely new pistol? What features did it have? When I first saw pics of the 17M online I noticed a few items right away. It lacked the ubiquitous finger grooves, the mag well had a slight flare to it, and the slide had a richer darker finish that was very attractive. Then the Gen5 17 and 19 were announced, the commercial version of the FBI’s new sidearms. After doing a lot of research (I’m a bit of a geek that way) I had to find one and see for myself if it met with all the hype. It did and I traded my Walther P99 for a brand new Glock 17 Gen5 with factory steel 3 dot Night Sights. Now with 3000 rounds through my G17 and zero issues, I have become a Glock guy. Then (drum roll please), the new G45 arrived and of course I had to check it out too.
The Glock 19X to the Glock 45, Crossover Perfection? Maybe.
When I looked at the G19X (Glock’s entry into the military MHS trials) I liked the concept of a shorter slide (G19) with a longer grip (G17). It felt balanced in my hand and it just felt right. I didn’t like the front lip on the mag well though. I thought if it were to be dropped that it could break easily and my Gen5 17 mags weren’t compatible with it. I didn’t like the peanut butter color as I prefer my firearms to be black but that’s my personal opinion. When Glock announced the G45 and it was black I have to admit I was a bit giddy. (Photo above courtesy of Glock’s website)
There are some changes from the G19X other than the color. The front lip on the mag well was eliminated along with the lanyard loop on the back of the grip. The cutout on the front of the magwell on the Gen5 G17 and G19 was also filled in. This was in part by law enforcement requirements and that some complaints arose of pinching fingers during reloads. I can say I have not had any issues with pinching during reloads on my Gen5 G17. (Photo at left courtesy of Glock’s website)
A surprise first from Glock, factory front slide serrations. For those that do press checks this is a welcomed feature and they look great. The G45 keeps with the Gen5 feature list: the ambidextrous slide release, the reversible mag catch, the Modular Backstrap System (MBS), the nDLC coating, and the Glock Marksman Barrel (GMB). Glock claims this improves accuracy. I believe it does to some degree but accuracy to me rests with the shooter. It comes with three Gen5 17 round mags with the orange follower (which I really like), an inexpensive Glock mag loader, an orange lock, manual, and Glock hard case. You can get standard polymer sights, steel 3 dot night sights, or the Glock Bold Sights made by Ameriglo.
The Numbers. (Screen shot courtesy of Glock’s website)
Range Report.
Simply put, it’s a great shooter right out of the box.
The G45 is very well balanced. The flare around the mag well is not over done and is comfortable. I put 50 rounds through it at 7 yards without a single FTF or FTE. Next, fired 300 rounds of various ammunition. Again zero issues. The ejection pattern is consistent and to the right between 3 and 5 feet. I didn’t have any brass come back at me. The recoil is mild, very manageable. I attribute this to the dual captive recoil spring system and the longer grip frame. The more surface area you have creates more friction and thus better control with proper grip. I tested Gen 4 mags as well as Magpul P17 mags and all worked without issue. I even tested an RWB 50 round drum mag also without issue (which was fun by the way). As is standard, a rail for a light or laser if you choose to add one.
The pistol breaks down just like every other Glock for cleaning so no surprises there. Developed in part for Law Enforcement, the shorter slide will be beneficial when officers are riding in their cruisers, the muzzle won’t press into the seat. On the civilian side this will be a great home defense pistol. For concealment, if you appendix carry the shorter slide won’t dig in when you sit. If you carry in the 4:30 position you might print a little but I don’t think it will be as noticeable as some might think. Over all, this pistol is a winner. I think Glock was onto something with the G19X and being Glock, they did not give up on the pursuit of perfection. They might just have found it with the G45.
I recently joined the Red Dot Yacht club (yes, that one is green) and am now tasked with delving into the world of dot optics on sidearms. Task one will be zeroing the optic properly to the pistol. Zeroing a dot to a pistol can be done the easy way ala shortcut, or it can be taken and done properly.
What is this… easy way?
‘Slaving’ is the easy way. It’s also called lollipopping and incorrectly called co-witness zeroing, or some variation on that. The iron sights on the pistol are shooting the correct point of aim/point of impact (POA/POI). After you mount the optic of choice, with the sights that can co-witness through the optic, you just adjust the dot onto the front sight while looking through a proper sight picture.
This works… to a degree.
Just as with rifle optics, a XX meter or XX yard zero is done at that XX distance. It is done so independently of other optical systems. Does this take longer? Yes. Does it assure a proper zero? Yes.
You use your eyes differently and you aim differently when using irons vs. using an optic. Linking the two methods might be a “close enough” solution for certain situations but it is a half measure, you need to do more.
Properly Zeroing the Optic
Zero the pistol optic at the proper distance, just like a rifle optic. I like 25 meters for a pistol and 50 for rifles. Whatever your set distance is for various personal or professional policy, you zero there.
Despite the math and the phrasing there is not actually a spot on “theoretical zero”. It’s phrasing popular in the military. The Armed Forces utilize a close zero for convenience but those 25 meter or 36 yard zero’s are exactly that, 25 meter or 36 yards. They can be used at greater distances but refining a zero at a greater distance is a new, more accurate zero.
A 50 meter zero is not a “theoretical” 200, it is a 50 meter zero. It can be used at 200 meters, provided the firearm and optic are up to that task too. The distinction is important. Saying you have a 25/300 or 50/200 optical zero is not stating two zeroed distances. The first number is the zero distance and the second is an effective range for point of aim and point of impact being in the ballpark for effective hits based on ballistic trajectory.
We’ve drifted off into general zero operations here so let me wrap this up.
You can lollipop your dot to make zeroing it easier. But, you must shoot at the proper distance for your purposes to have an actual working zero.
Some gun colleagues and I were having a conversation recently and someone mentioned a “SHTF Office Gun”. I remember laughing to myself, saying something like – sheesh, can you imagine a Pediatric Office SHTF Gun? That would go over like a lead balloon (no pun intended).
But when you really think about it, we are a soft target, located very near a school. This startling reality was pointed out to me by a different friend when we were talking about Stop the Bleed recently.
I have a lot of friends who get paid to think about and plan for bad ‘SHTF’ things happening. Nobody gives them a hard time about that because they are LE and EMS. Their job is to think the unthinkable.
But on serious reflection, I get paid to think about bad things happening too. It’s my job to think about awful things that happen to kids, and how best to make sure those things don’t happen, or to catch them quickly if they do. Vaccination, regular growth and development screening, monitoring and treating infections, following up on suspicious neurological signs – all of these things are part of my job.
So why is it unthinkable to plan for a violent drug addict or a nutcase mass shooter taking his “Plan B” to our office from the school down the street? Hell, some of the parents in our practice ARE drug addicts. Our staff has people lose their shit at them on the semi-regular. Why then is it terrible of me to think about a response to these potential events?
This shouldn’t be unthinkable. It should be INFINITELY thinkable and planned for. But the American Academy of Pediatrics treats guns as if they were a disease rather than a “vaccine” against dangerous predators. So you won’t find any office security recommendations on the AAP website. In fact, many parents would have an absolute cow if they thought a firearm was on the premises, just like they have a cow over armed teachers in schools.
All I want to do is keep a lead injection device handy in case of such an attack. But my practice partner would defecate a cinderblock, so realistically it’s never going to happen. We have lit exits signs, fire extinguisher, smoke alarms, and every other building safety device as required by law. But nothing with which to protect ourselves should a violent person try to invade the premises.
With the wheels in my head already turning, I started thinking some of those unthinkable things – as if I were writing an urban fantasy novel or something. I started playing “what if?”. Except this stuff isn’t fantasy, it’s reality. Violent things happen in the world. The chances of it happening specifically “here” are statistically small, but it pays to be prepared.
I started thinking – what if we went on lock-down due to an active shooter event at the school down the street? We do have inner hallways away from windows where we could shelter people. We do have more than one entrance, but only the main entrance is unlocked. If we were notified by law enforcement of such an event, that door could be quickly deadbolted. Somebody could shoot out a window for entry I suppose, but there isn’t a lot to do about building design after-the-fact. And installing bullet-resistant glass seems like cost-prohibitive overkill in a building that’s over sixty years old.
“IF” I kept a SHTF firearm at the office, it would have to be locked up. That is non-negotiable. I’m frequently away from my desk seeing patients, and there are tiny humans with curious fingers wandering all over the place. I also cannot realistically carry on-body during work hours as little children have no boundaries and are always patting on me and invading personal space. I would be “made” in short order. I’m thinking an AR pistol might be a viable option because of the smaller size, magazine capacity, maneuverability, velocity, and red dot.
Secure storage for such a SHTF gun would be essential. Secure-It has combination lock bolt-on safes that might work under my desk top such as the Fast box 40 and Fastbox 47. I bought a model 47 for home use, so it might work in the office too.
This would be strictly a defensive gun obviously. I’m not Wonder Woman. Realistically, I’m not going to be clearing the building. In the case of a lock-down, after we got everyone herded into interior rooms away from windows and doors, I’d be hunkered down behind cover watching a door that might get kicked in while we wait for the SWAT team to arrive or for law enforcement to announce all clear. I don’t have any illusions of heroism beyond trying to protect my office staff and patients.
It might sound crazy. It might sound “Unthinkable”. But if I, as the firearm owner of the practice, don’t think about it – who will?
When I did an internet search for information about medical office security, I got all kinds of hits related to HIPAA and information security, but very little about the security of the physical building and the physical protection of staff and patients.
Dr John Edeen of Doctors For Responsible Gun Ownership (DRGO) has done a good deal of work regarding hospital vulnerability and advocating for workplace carry rules, but I haven’t seen much out there for medical office safety. Maybe I’m just not looking in the right place.
As much as no one likes to think about it, when it comes right down to it, a SHTF office gun may be one of the few cost-effective options we have to keep our staff and patients safe in the event of a violent attack.
Of course, this thought experiment presumes some definition of “common-sense gun laws”. The phrase has no generally accepted meaning. Pacifists might imagine an army with no guns. Black Lives Matter might imagine an unarmed police force. American gun controllers imagine an American army and police force with guns, but keeping guns out of the hands of nearly all ordinary people.
To make this exercise meaningful to an American audience, let’s adopt the last of these illustrative definitions. What would such a society look like? We have but to look at the news coming from Venezuela and Mexico.
Let’s look first at Mexico where the issue is crime (organized and not) more so than tyranny. The 1924 Mexican constitution guarantees the right to keep arms but not to bear them. The Mexican government vigorously enforces its sophisticated regime of gun control on ordinary citizens (i.e., those with no criminal background). As a practical matter, no gun control is effective with respect to the “made men” of the various cartels. They pass police and army checkpoints upon presentation of their cartel credentials.
The ordinary Mexican campesino or city dweller, is at the mercy of cartel shootouts, systematic organized crime and free-lancers whenever he steps outside his home. There are only 4,000 individual carry permits in a nation of 125 million; i.e., a rate of 0.003%. By comparison, as many as 17% of Americans in some states have carry permits; many more may carry in states with permitless carry.
Next, turn to Venezuela. The Venezuelan constitution secures no right to arms. The current government confiscated all arms in the hands of heretofore licensed owners. Only official government military and police authorities as well as Colectivos—the government’s para-official “brown-shirts” —have arms; and, of course, the criminals who have not yet felt compelled to trade their guns for groceries.
We see on the news impotent demonstrators running from or being run over by armored vehicles. We viewed one instance of soldiers backing off when a demonstrator fired a pistol at them. Once Jimmy Carter certified Venezuelan elections as free and fair, nothing remained to guarantee the natural right of the Venezuelan people to elect the “democratic socialist” of their choice to govern them by their peaceful consent. The security of the state seems to be in the hands of foreign soldiers from Cuba, Russia and China.
Do these two examples prove anything? Of course not, in themselves. They are simply contemporary cases with which we are familiar. Each nation has its own culture and tradition. We must roll up our sleeves and do some serious work to see whether there are any patterns across current nations or across history with a common civilization.
Japan has extremely effective gun control. Only state officers and the Yakuza (its native mafia) carry guns. Hunters and marksmen keep and use guns under strict licensing.
Singapore has similarly effective gun control. Only state officers and a couple thousand rich men have guns. Gun traffickers are executed by hanging. All physically fit males are trained to arms in mandatory military service and then disarmed when discharged. The island nation is mostly benevolently and quite prosperously ruled by a popularly-elected Chinese president under what is essentially a one-party rule system.
Brazil has had very effective gun control. Only state officers, a small number of professional security guards and criminals, whether organized or not, carry guns. But violent crime is out of control. This soon may change under its newly elected president.
Switzerland has some gun control and mandatory military service, with retention of arms by reservists following active duty. While guns are ubiquitous (still falling far short of US circumstances) its violent crime rate is among the lowest of all nations.
Israel has some gun control and mandatory military service. Guns are ubiquitous, but under heavy state control. Homicide and violent crime by the Jewish population is nearly unheard of.
South and North Korea both have strict gun control. One operates under a popularly elected democracy, the other seems to be a hereditary absolute monarchy. One is prosperous and peaceful, the other is starving and warlike. Both seem to be perfectly stable with no revolutionary fervor in evidence.
Carry on the survey to each reader’s personal satisfaction. What sort of gun-control seems to “work”? What sort of gun control seems to serve as a hedge against tyranny and uncontrolled crime?
Bear in mind that a “hedge” may be best placed when there is no recognizable risk on the horizon. Nor does a hedge necessarily provide an iron-clad guarantee against catastrophe. The most salient question is whether the cost of the hedge is prudent or exceeds the cost of catastrophe factored by the probability of its occurrence.
The history of crime and democide counsels that the cost of catastrophe, and probability of occurrence, must not be dismissed casually. R.J. Rummel’s lifetime work accounted for 100 million civilian deaths by their own governments in the 20th century. He coined the term “democide” to describe the phenomena, far more deadly than war has been for soldiers.
Conversely, the cost of maintaining the hedge of a “well-regulated” (i.e., “effective”) armed populace to protect their sovereignty is—relatively—cheap. The United States, with our Second Amendment guarantee, may be the most prudently protected people for the least societal cost practical.
.
.
—‘MarkPA’ is trained in economics, a life-long gun owner, NRA Instructor and Massad Ayoob graduate. He is inspired by our inalienable rights to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” and holds that having the means to defend oneself and one’s community is vital to securing them.
