Advertisement

Colt’s Hammerless Pocket Gun – The 1903 and 1908 Pistols

Courtesy Sam Lisker/ Colt Autos

One of the most interesting and perhaps underrated handguns of all time is the Colt 1903 Pocket Hammerless. The 1903 is a product of John Moses Browning’s engineering genius. The pistol is attractive; it is so thin it is downright svelte. The pistol was called the Model M internally at Colt and the Pocket Hammerless in advertising. The pistol isn’t a true hammerless pistol as the hammer is simply hidden from view. Browning designed a .45 Auto with a hidden hammer along with many other prototype pistols indicating the 1903 pistol is an example of his thoughts at the time.  The 1903 had in place many of the advantages of the later Colt 1911 .45 automatic. These included a removable box magazine, a slide lock safety that made the pistol safe for carry with the hammer cocked and to the rear, and a grip safety that prevented the pistol from firing unless the grip were firmly depressed. The pistol fit most hands well and was no larger than needed for the .32 Automatic Colt Pistol chambering. While similar to FN produced handguns the Colt seemed to have an American profile in comparison to the Browning 1910 pistol.   

The Colt 1903 is a straight blowback handgun without the complications of a locked breech. It was popular when introduced and  Americans widely accepted the new self loading pistol. While the impression exists that the revolver was more popular in America and the self loader practically universal in Europe quality self loading pistols were very popular in American. The flat profile and increased number of shots over the revolver was appealing. The small caliber .32 ACP was much more powerful than the .32 Smith and Wesson revolver cartridge. As an example the 71 grain full metal jacketed .32 ACP breaks about 1,000 fps from the Colt while the .32 Smith and Wesson Long’s 98 grain round nose lead bullet exhibits 680 fps in a four inch barrel hand ejector revolver. Penetration, the single most important component of wound potential, was better with the .32 ACP round. The Colt with its nine rounds of ammunition was obviously the better personal defense handgun than a small .32 caliber revolver.  During the life of the Colt 1903 some 572,000 were manufactured. In addition another 134,500 Colt 1908 models were sold. These were the Colt 1903 in .380 ACP caliber. The 1903 Model M handguns were produced in four variants. They were popular with cops, especially detectives, bad guys and civilians. While I prefer more smash than offered by the .32 ACP cartridge it was more powerful and with more penetration than the common .32 revolver cartridges of the day and the .380 ACP even more powerful. When armed with a Colt automatic you had a fine handgun well worth the price.

Colt was a pacesetter in the introduction of reliable self loading handguns. Colt’s pistols changed the handgunning world forever. Smith and Wesson offered the oddball .35 Smith and Wesson, which was really a generation behind the Colt 1903 when introduced. Savage claimed Ten Shots Quick with their pistol and the Savage .32 was interesting, but it did not handle as well as the Colt. Colt manufactured excellent double action revolvers and the 1911 .45 but did not neglect the small pistol market either. The Colt was most famously carried by NYCPD detectives. It was a favored lady’s gun and was the piece carried by Eleanor Roosevelt during her travels. Fictional characters also used the Colt 1903. Humphrey Bogart hefted either a 1903 or 1908 in Casablanca and early Dick Tracy detective comics had the fearless detective armed with a Colt 1903. Real bad buys such as John Dillinger and the very bad girl Bonnie Parker, from the other side of the fence, carried the Colt 1903 as a backup. 

The Colt 1903 was very popular worldwide. Records show that dozens of Japanese Army and Navy Officers ordered Colt automatic pistols for personal use. Considering the size and weight of the underpowered 8mm Nambu I would have preferred the Colt as well.

The pistol was issued to general officers as the official sidearm, along with a holster and spare magazine. The 1903 saw use with CID personnel. The 1908 handgun was purchased by the Shanghai police and saw a great deal of action. The pistol was air dropped into Europe and snuck in by OSS agents. Many resistance fighters were armed with the Colt 1903 pistol. The movie Operation Anthropoid depicts this use accurately, and the price many of these brave men and women paid. The pistol was trusted worldwide as a reliable accurate and lightweight handgun. After the end of World War Two the Model 1903 was no longer manufactured but remained in use for decades longer, including serving as the General Officer’s Pistol until the 1970s. Today a modern replica is licensed by Colt and manufactured by Advanced Armament Corporation. This pistol follows the General Officer’s Pistol pattern, with a parkerized finish and wooden grips.    

The Colt Model M as the factory referred to it was among the lightest Colt self loading pistols at 24 ounces. The pistol is 6.75 inches long and only 1.15 inch wide. No wonder John Dillinger had one under his shirt on that hot and sultry day when he was shot dead by FBI agents. The pistol features a grip safety and a slide lock safety. The handgun was touted by Colt as safe with only the grip safety in use as a safety measure. The ‘flipping sear’ arrangement indeed made for a very safe handgun. I have carried the Colt 1903 as a backup to the Colt 1911 and find the similarities in handling make for a very nice pair. While there are more modern choices the Colt 1903 is well made of good material and I would not hesitate to trust an example in good condition for personal defense. Modern lightweight 9mm pistols caused the retirement of my 1903 for this purpose some time ago.

When the new breed of ultra compact .32 ACP pistols was introduced beginning with the Kel Tec polymer frame pistol it was fashionable to provide an illustration of the new pistols beside the larger Colt 1903. While there is a size difference there is also a difference in combat ability. The .32 ACP pocket pistols basically fill the niche once owned by small .25 ACP pistols. They are difficult to hit with past a few yards. The Colt 1903, in comparison, is as accurate as many service pistols. I have fired mine extensively. With the CCI Blazer 71 grain practice load I have fired a five shot group into a spacing of less than two inches at 15 yards. The pistol’s practical accuracy is limited by the small sights but then they were the norm for the day. In fast paced combat drills such as the Applegate Point, in which the pistol is quickly brought to bear and fired as soon as the slide breaks the plane between the eyes and the target, the Colt 1903 is a very fast handling pistol with a high hit probability. The Colt 1903 is a great handgun, with a rich history and much practical value.    

Variations – There are four primary variations of the Colt 1903, not counting military versions that were parkerized. The first model featured a four inch barrel and barrel bushing. The next model, beginning in 1908, has a 3.75 inch barrel with barrel bushing, the third type have the short barrel but no barrel bushing. The final version introduced in 1926 has the same 3.75 inch barrel and bushingless barrel and also a magazine safety that prevents the pistol from firing if the magazine is not in place.

Leather for the 1903 – There are a number of custom makers that offer good quality leather holsters for the Colt 1903. World War Supply offers a replica of the original military flap holster, complete with a cleaning rod as originally issued. This is a good addition to an original Colt pistol. Wright Leatherworks is among a very few makers offering quality leather for the Colt 1903. I have used the Wright inside the waistband holster for the Colt 1903 pistol. Well made and with an excellent fit and finish this holster allows good concealment of the flat and light Colt 1903. This holster is still ordered occasionally and the company keeps a mold available, indicating that folks are still using the Colt 1903 as intended.

The Competitor Follows the Equalizer, Smith & Wesson’s New Metal Frame 5″ 9mm

Smith & Wesson appears to be stepping away from the letter and number naming convention and going for more descriptive titles in their new pistols lines. The Equalizer was a clear and blunt stab back to the whole ‘the firearm is the great equalizer’ mode of thought and this next entry follows that same style. The Competitor is equally unquiet about its existence and intent as a pistol meant to hit the competitive circuit out of the box.

From S&W,

SPRINGFIELD, MA., (11/29/2022) – Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (NASDAQ Global Select: SWBI), a leader in firearm manufacturing and design is excited to introduce a new member of the M&P metal-framed series, the Performance Center® M&P®9 M2.0® Competitor®.

Built for competition right out of the box, this metal-framed 9mm pistol is designed to give competitive shooters the edge. The Competitor comes with a 5-inch barrel, has an enhanced sear for lighter, crisper trigger let-off, and includes a flared magazine well for fast and efficient reloads. Boasting a new look, the aggressive lightening cuts on both the top and sides of the slide ultimately reduce the amount of weight in front of the chamber and, in return, help improve the recoil balance point. The slide is cut for optics, includes a fiber optic front sight, and blacked out serrated rear sight. The Competitor comes with an oversized mag release that is reversible for both right and left-handed users and ships with a total of four magazines. Choose from models available in 10+1 or 17+1 round capacities with a Tungsten Gray Cerakote® or black Armornite® slide finish. Smith & Wesson is proud to introduce the Performance Center M&P9 M2.0 Competitor.

The Competitor has an MSRP of $999.00         

Check out the new Competitor and all Smith & Wesson products at www.smith-wesson.com.

To stay up to date on all of the latest news and events, connect with Smith & Wesson on FacebookTwitterInstagram, and YouTube.                  

The introduction of the Metal Frame line would naturally lead to the competitive field as the heavier frame guns are very popular in those spaces. This will compete against the 2011s, the weighted frame 320’s, the CZ Shadow 2’s, and the other stout and low recoil 9mm pistols.

I love the M&P frame, it is one of the comfiest I have ever shot. I love metal frames, my 226, 229, and AXG attest. Now I can acquire the alloy of them both.

The Recover Tactical P-IX – A Reverse Bullpup For Your Glock

Glocks can be anything you want them to be. At SHOT 2022, I saw that in living color. I stumbled across two kits that were of immediate interest to me. I like odd, weird, and seemingly bizarre stuff. The two kits I ran across were the Meta Tactical Bullpup which turned your Glock into a bullpup rifle. The second was the exact opposite, the Recover Tactical P-IX. It actually reverse bullpupped a Glock. 

Recover Tactical is an interesting company. They produce a lot of weird products for various platforms that seem odd and maybe make you scratch your head. While their products tend to appear odd, they tend to be pretty dang useful. Things like the RT 20/20, their grips that ad Picatinny tails to guns without rails, and many more. Is the P-IX another handy piece of gear? 

The Recover Tactical P-IX – The Basics 

This isn’t your traditional Glock chassis kit. It AR-izes your Glock pistol. Unlike a traditional Glock chassis, the entire Glock is enveloped here. It places the Glock in front of the trigger, and the pictures do it way more justice than my written words ever could. Just look at it. The magwell is your Glock grip. 

You have to attach a charging handle to your Glock slide, then drop it into the P-IX. Three latches lock the gun into the P-IX, and you are ready to rock and roll. Installation is super easy.

The design features a built-in safety, a new magazine release, as well as numerous additional rails. Across the top, we get what’s essentially a full-length optics rail, just in case your Glock needs an LPVO. 

At the front, we also have two side rails and a small bottom rail. At the back, we have a threaded portion designed to accept an AR-15 type buffer tube for attaching a brace or potentially a stock if SBRs are your thing. You can even swap the standard grip out for your favorite AR-15 grip. The front is wide open, so you can attach most cans without issue as well. 

What’s the Point of the P-IX

The most obvious advantage is the ability to add a brace or stock in the event of an SBR. This makes it easy to stabilize the weapon and increase your effective range. It handles much more like a CZ scorpion than a Glock with the P-IX. 

The presence of numerous rails across the bottom, type, and side makes it easy to add various accessories. This includes optics, like red dots, or even bigger and better optics. Don’t forget being able to add more powerful lights that offer rifle-like performance or even IR lasers for the goons out there. 

Why the P-IX over a Glock? Well, this is still a handgun, and even in states like California, you can get a Glock Gen 3. That same state makes it plenty tough to get semi-auto rifles, but tossing a Glock into the P-IX gives you some of the same benefits. (Although lord knows what is illegal in Cali, so this isn’t legal advice)

It’s also a pretty cheap way to try out the Cheek Pistol concept. 

Review of the P-IX 

I dropped my Gen 4 Glock 17 into the P-IX and locked it down. Installation is easy, and it takes very little time to do so. It takes more time to attach the charging handle than anything else. Once attached I took it to the range to give it a little test fire. 

I’ll go ahead and get the worst part out of the way now. The P-IX has an absolutely terrible trigger. It’s super heavy, long, and spongy and is about as bad as a trigger can get. Even so, the additional stability the P-IX offers allows you to extend your effective range. I can hit targets at 50 yards with a Glock 17 a portion of the time. Toss the Glock 17 in the P-IX, and I’m hitting it every time. 

Unlike other chassis kits, the Glock sits in the same place every time, so the zero doesn’t shift when removed and reinserted if it does shift, it’s not notable out to 50 yards. 

Reliability isn’t affected either. It’s had zero issues over a few hundred rounds with various magazines. The wide-open ejection port keeps things nice and reliable and prevents the casings from locking up the slide. 

The P-IX offers great ergonomics, well decent ergonomics. The safety is very AR-like and easy to use. The magazine release is placed well but is not tactile by any means. It’s tough to know how hard to press it to release the mag, so just go whole hog until the magazine drops out. The P-IX and a brace make the Glock easier to control with a reduction in recoil and muzzle rise. 

Yay or Nay 

The P-IX isn’t for everyone, but it’s a solid little piece of gear. Glock chassis kits certainly aren’t for everyone, either. With that in mind, the P-IX does what it promises without creating any issues with your gun. Sure it might be silly for some of us in a free state, but for others, it might be a fun range toy. On my next range trip, I plan to remove the brace and try the cheek pistol concept, so wish me luck. 

SIG P365 XL 9mm – A Great Carry Gun

This is an attractively sized pistol that shoots like a big gun.

The SIG P365 has earned a reputation as a reliable and useful concealed carry handgun. It isn’t useful for competetion or service use but it is a purpose designed concealed carry and protection handgun. The P 365 has a small foot print and is easily concealed in a quality holster. If you enjoy firing the SIG P365 you will enjoy the P365 XL even more. The XL variant features a longer barrel and slide than the P365. The result is a pistol with more weight a better balance and a longer sight radius. In some situations you may really need the edge in concealment offered by the P365, but for most of us the P365XL is easily concealed. The pistol is optics ready and also has a taller grip that accommodates a 12 round magazine compared to the original ten round magazine. This long slide version of the popular P365 9mm isn’t a large handgun but per my testing it shoots like a big gun.

The gripping surface officers a good balance of adhesion and abrasion offering a solid gripping surface when the hands are cold, wet or sweaty. A good feature is that the pistol offers a rail for mounting combat lights, a big improvement over most small handgun. The pistol features a straight trigger an improved design over previous P 365 pistols. The slide features cocking serrations both forward and rear. The extractor is a robust design while the ejection port is generous. The magazine release is an unusual triangular design. A tapered magazine and generous magazine well makes for rapid speedloads. The slide release is easily reached. Takedown is simple enough and the pistol is easily maintained. The sights are SIG’s XRAY type three dot tritium night sights. Night sights or self luminous iron sights are essential to all around the clock defense. All in all this is a credible capable and nice looking package.

The pistol was lightly lubricated on the long bearing surfaces and barrel hood before firing. The magazines are well designed and reliable units. However they are very difficult to load to full capacity. Loading to ten rounds isn’t difficult. Stiff springs are essential to reliable function. The eleventh and twelfth round, however, were pressed in only with difficulty. I would recommend loading 12 rounds, locking the slide to the rear, and dropping the slide to give the shooter a total 12 round capacity. For most of the test I loaded ten rounds in the magazines for convenience. Most of the loads used were Winchester Ready 115 grain FMJ along with some Browning FMJ loads. The pistol was fired at 7, 10, and 15 yards. Most of the firing was accomplished in quick down and dirty drills. I drew quickly from concealment and quickly getting on target. I fired double taps, hammers, and controlled pairs depending on the range. The pistol gets on target quickly. Good accuracy is a result of the excellent trigger and sights. I did not explore the red dot option. For those who prefer optics the SIG P365XL will accommodate.  

The pistol never failed to feed, chamber, fire or eject. The SIG P365 gets on target quickly and good center of mass hits are easily obtained at 7 to 10 yards for those who practice. The pistol isn’t useless at 25 yards it simply demands attention to the sights and trigger and more time in affirming the sight picture. I fired the pistol with the Winchester 124 grain +P hollow point a modern loading with excellent wound potential. At nearly 1200 fps this is a hard hitting load. Recoil is there but the pistol isn’t difficult to control. I finally settled down to fire the pistol for absolute slow fire accuracy. Firing from the MTM Caseguard K Zone firing rest at 15 yards I fired the Winchester 124 grain +P and the Winchester 115 grain FMJ, firing five shot groups. The FMJ loading put five into two inches and the +P put five into just a little smaller group. The SIG P365 XL is among the most attractive concealed carry pistols. It is worth a hard look.

During the test I used a DeSantis Mini Belt Slide, using it for an original P365 fired for comparison and the P365XL as well.

SIG P365 XL 9mm

Length: 6.6 in.
Height: 4.8 in.
Width:  1.3 in.
Weight: 21 oz.
Barrel Length: 3.7 in.
Capacity: 12 rounds

How New are Repeaters?

I hear this one once every cycle or so, that the Founding Fathers could not have envisioned a world of repeating firearms. It is an interesting take and holds water if you are willing to ignore a tremendous amount of information, but it is not an accurate one. We’ve been trying and succeeding in inventive ways to make repeating firearms for centuries.

Click the video and watch Ian enlighten you.

The semi-automatic and automatic are just mechanically advantaged repeating firearms. But the real leap to making these work was the metallic cartridge. Repeaters existed longer before the constitution was ratified than the nuclear bomb came afterward. Multishot firearms are old tech.

WHERE IS YOUR AWB NOW PELOSI? Image via Fightlite.

The argument always seem to rely on alleging that firearms are tremendously more lethal nowadays. They aren’t, firing five or six times out of a modern handgun or rifle is roughly as dangerous as firing five or six times out of a firearm from 400 years passed. What we got better at was making the components, we make everything efficiently so that a shot could be taken as close to at will/need as manageable.

The Everyday Armor T-Shirt 2.0 From Premier Armor

Way back in the day, I combined an armored panel from Premier Armor with an armor-carrying shirt from Tru-Spec and inspired both companies to work together. Now, years and years later, Premier Armor has refined the system into something more concealable, comfortable and offers better protection. The Everyday Armor T-Shirt 2.0 makes some improvements but retains the same level of protection as the original. 

The Everyday Armor T-Shirt is built around the 7.75 x 12.75-inch plates. These provide superior protection and are easier to conceal than your standard cut plate. The T-shirt fits tight and clings to the body and features a number of reinforced areas to support the weight of the plates without the shirt bending, sagging, or compromising. 

The big change to the Everyday Armor system is that the armor inserts for the bottom instead of the top. This makes it much easier to put the shirt on and easier to take off. They also added Concealment Channels that pull the shirt tighter to the body for increased concealment. 

How The Everyday Concealment T-Shirt Works 

It’s a fairly simple setup. The shirt fits incredibly tightly, much like an Underarmor style sports shirt. The tight shirt holds the panels in place and secures them in one location. The shirt itself is moisture-wicking, fairly lightweight, and breathable. The large panels offer plenty of torso protection, and the tight nature of the shirt keeps them in place. 

The two panels offer you total protection front and rear. Concealment does require some form of an overshirt. Toss on a button-down shirt, hoodie, or hockey jersey, and the panels effectively disappear. The shirt fits quite tight, and the panels won’t get in the way of your draw by any means. 

In practice, the shirt is quite comfy, and the plates don’t rub you raw. You can expect it to get a little warm where the plates sit. It’s a bit like a sweater in the area, and harsh, hot environments will make things a little rough, admittedly. It’s a sacrifice worth making if you need body armor.

Getting the Everyday Armor T-Shirt 2.0 setup takes no time at all. Turn the shirt inside out, insert the level IIIA NIJ Certified plates and then toss it on. Boom, like that, you are ready to roll out like the uparmored tank you are. 

Why Concealable Armor? 

For most of us, this seems like an extreme item to EDC. Most of us likely don’t need armor every day, but there is certainly a niche of people who could use an item like this. If you’ve received credible threats, then armor might help save your life. 

If you’re like me and you worked repo at one point or another, then concealable armor can be quite handy. In my state, a repo man isn’t even allowed to carry a gun. There is likely a wide number of situations why you might want some credible protection from ballistic threats. 

The Everyday Armor T-Shirt 2.0 comes as a complete package and gives you peace of mind that conceals as easy as your SIG P365. 

Gunday Brunch 78: The Guns of Batman (RIP Kevin Conroy)

In this somewhat disjointed episode, Jack and Caleb are joined by the disembodied voice of Keith where they talk about the guns of the various Batman franchises.

BatGATs! Caleb, Jack, and the disembodied voice of Keith discuss the guns of the Batman series

RIP Kevin Conroy.

RIP Jason David Frank too.

Both heroes of our childhoods.

I’m just an icon and a tinny robot voice for this one as I was recording on at bar on their terrible WiFi while my truck got fixed around the corner, but its a great episode about nerddom and gun portrayal in movies. Sometimes realism is not the vibe to go for.

Boomers and Zoomers

Author’s note: I just want to be clear that I’ve had this particular draft saved on my computer prior to Mr. Hackathorn’s October 19, 2022 YouTube video hosted on Wilson Combat’s channel concerning red dot and iron sights on handguns. This piece has nothing to do with that, and timing is just coincidental.

I am writing this in annum 2022, in which in the Internet firearms landscape might appear to be divided by the boomers and the zoomers. Boomers are presumably laughed at for their lack of self awareness in their admiration over what are technically more fickle firearms designs with lower capacity that use more cumbersome and expensive cartridges. The zoomers are the younger camp that epitomizes the attitude of “the future is now, old man.” Zoomer guns are made of plastic, hold 24 cartridges, have a mounted dot and weapon light, and strikers because ain’t nobody got time for hammers. Zoomer designs, materials, carry methods, holster choices and all manner of accouterments are a sharp contrast from the wood, steel, and leather aspects of the past.

I must confess that I have a deep appreciation for old guns, their designs and their contextual use continues to this day and is one of my favorite topics to keep discovering. The more I learn about shooting today, the more interesting drawing connections and analyzing the past becomes to me.  

One cannot understand the present without studying the past.

The impetus for this article comes from some of the insights I gathered after I wrote the Stakeout Unit piece. Jim Cirillo preferred a .38 Special K-frame Smith & Wesson while Bill Allard preferred his tuned 1967 National Match pistol. One man preferred a revolver and another man preferred a 1911. Simple enough, right? On today’s Internet, either man would be dismissed as a grandpa who needs to chill. But giving the topic more thought, it dawned on me: for basically four generations, the American shooter, regardless of their occupation as soldiers, cops, competitive shooters, or regular people– they all either carried and shot revolvers or a 1911 pistol.

9mm Colt 1911 Gov’t Model, carried both by Parker and Longbough in Way Of The Gun. image credit: IMFDB.org

And yes, you had those who preferred the Hi-Power but I’d argue they were the CZ hipster shooters of their day.

Four generations covers an entire century, so it is no wonder these weapons have permeated deeper cultural layers and became things of legend and tradition. I am not saying that there aren’t boomers out there who miss the point entirely and don’t get it, but it’s easy for zoomers to laugh at a boomer who shoots a revolver or 1911 seriously without realizing that this boomer came up shooting guns like that for their entire life. The same way their fathers and grandfathers did before them. Like the gentlemen from the Stakeout Unit mentioned above, clueful shooters understood and worked around their guns’ limitations. This is why Stakeout Unit members also carried extra pistols with them and brought shotguns on stakeouts as well. They made use of what was available at the time to the best of their ability. This is the kind of familiarity that brings forth comfort and thus confidence with chosen gear. It is difficult to blame a shooter that has put in the time and work and smartly understands their chosen firearm for sticking to it in spite better options being available. Like with everything, context is crucial.

Legacy and tradition never stopped yesteryear’s shooters from moving forward and finding better ways to do things. The shooting thought leaders of the era rightfully continued to think outside the box and developed better support gear like speedloaders or better holsters. There is a reason why the photo of Milt Sparks and Bruce Nelson is the first thing you see when you click on this article.

A 5th Generation Glock 17 fully done up by Boresight Solutions with an Aimpoint ACRO P2 red dot perfectly showcases a reliable and top the line duty handgun in the year 2022. image credit: Boresight’s FB page.

Incidents with criminals, such as the aftermath of the 1986 Miami shootout, the US military switching to the M9 pistol and regular innovation also propelled the state of things forward as well. But so ingrained was the generations’ old legacy of revolvers and 1911s that during the early days of the 9mm Luger “wondernine” revolution, many of the big gun companies offered double-action only variants of their models in order to court shooters who had already spent their entire lives shooting revolvers. The venerable Beretta 92 D comes to mind, for example.  

Understanding the complications of a revolver’s timing or the fragility of the 1911’s internal extractor makes me appreciate my Glock 17 even more so. In the same way, modern shooters are embracing positive aspects from old wheelguns or single action 1911s. More than a century later, shooters are still obsessed with the pull and break provided by a well tuned 1911 style trigger. They see the performance benefits and so 2011 style pistols are soaring in popularity now. These guns take the best benefits that a 1911 offers and address other shortcomings, like the lack of capacity, for example. Similarly, while duty size revolvers are not as popular as they once were, the American consumer still likes to buy compact sized carry-friendly revolvers as they excel in certain self defense niches.

By the way, the boomer and zoomer memes are funny. Don’t stop sharing them.

The 1911 Is Forever.

The MFT Battlelink Minimalist Stock – Why The Hate?

I’ve never cloned a rifle, but I enjoy the cloning community. I follow several pages across different social media outlets and enjoy seeing and learning about military rifles, especially those in use by various special units. I bring all this up because cloners are interesting folks. I once saw one of America’s elite and his rifle being made fun of because of his stock. It was a Mission First Tactical Battlelink Minimalist Stock. 

As this overweight neckbeard made fun of a special ops troop for his stock, I wondered what the problem was with the stock. I had never used one, but I stumbled across this same or similar remarks across the internet. People often remark on the stock but seemingly never provide a reason. Reviews across the board seem good, so when I stumbled across one, I figured, why not check it out and see what the internet hate is about? 

The MFT Battlelink Minimalist – Keeping It Light 

What first took me by surprise was how freaking light this thing is. I’m used to my SOPMOD B5 and Magpul SL stocks. This thing weighs nothing in comparison. It’s 5.8 ounces, according to the internet. If you are going for a lightweight build, then the MFT Battlelink seems like an awesome option. 

It’s a whole lot lighter than most stocks and a lot lighter than any of the PDW stocks I’ve ever used. I own an Aero Precision EPC, and as a PCC, it’s got a heavy buffer, which makes it a bit rear-heavy. I keep a Magpul SL on it normally and swapping it for the MFT Battlelink resulted in a bit more balanced rifle. 

The lock-up from the stock to the tube is tight, very tight, and wobble-free. However, there are no issues manipulating or deploying the stock. It surprised me how tight and nice the lock-up was for a fairly budget-friendly stock. 

We get numerous sling mounts, including a QD port on the bottom of the stock that is fixed and non-rotating. There are areas to attach a web attachment as well. I used the QD port exclusively and had no issues. The stock forms a hook-like shape that people say gets caught on stuff. 

I guess it could happen, but it seems rare. If this was a major concern, I’ve seen guys braid 550 cord from one part to another to form an A frame-type design. Heck, MFT started selling braided cord for just that reason. 

Launching Lead 

With the stock attached, a pocket full of hope, and a range bag full of 9mm, I hit the range. With the stock adjusted just right for me, I started launching lead and shooting various drills. The cheek weld is surprisingly okay. It’s not as good as the Magpul SL, but it provides more than enough. It’s more and better than your standard M4 stock. 

The stock advertises itself as minimalist, and that’s true, but the shoulder pad isn’t. It’s fairly wide and makes great contact with the shoulder. It’s as wide as some of the larger stocks on the market. A decent cheek weld and good shoulder contact are nice. I used my angled foregrip to pull it in tight. 

I didn’t get single beard hair pulled out either, and that’s always a plus. In firing, I found no flaws. In donning, moving, and removing the sling, I never had issues with the sling catching on the stock and disabling it in one way or another. 

The stock has an aggressive rolled toe that is nice as you go from low to ready. It rolls up nicely and catches your shoulder. The toe also makes it nice and easy to transition from shoulder to shoulder as well. 

The MFT Battlelink stock locks in nice and tight and soaks up recoil nicely. It also doesn’t slip and slide off your shoulder and feels quite nice. I’ve only had a few days and a few hundred reps, both dry and live, but I don’t get the hate. 

Why The Hate? 

Is the MFT Battlelink God’s gift to stocks? Maybe not, but for a minimalist rig, it’s quite nice, and for a budget-friendly rig, it’s also quite nice. It’s super light but stable and comfortable. It doesn’t offer the same support as other, bigger stocks, but it offers a surprising amount for such a minimalist rig. 

I think the hate comes from the fact it’s often shoved on bad rifles. These stocks are fairly common on super-budget rifles, and that might have gotten them a bad reputation. I love shotguns, but the shotgun community doesn’t give shotguns a good name. I think the same thing happened with the MFT Battlelink stock. 

All in all, it’s a fairly well-made stock that’s ultra-light. I don’t get the hate, and I think it’s a great piece of gear. Maybe I’m wrong, but maybe the internet gives things bad reputations for no reason at all. It’s certainly not the Olight of stocks. 

Dark Star Gear Launches the Apollo!

dark star gear apollo holsters for the sig P365 springfield hellcat smith & wesson shield plus and glock 43 48 43x

Is it a return to the moon missions?

Not quite that exciting, but close.

The Apollo series from Dark Star Gear is the essentials you need to start carrying with any of the four most popular slim-9’s as soon as it arrives. It is meant to take the guesswork out of the holster selection and accessory process and do the one thing you’re buying the holster to do, carry your gun.

From DSG,

Introducing Apollo

With what we learned from the years of feedback from our Orion and Hitchhiker holsters, we’ve packaged the most desired features into one new offering. We noticed a pattern for the current generation of concealed carry pistols and their buyers. I don’t want to say we’ve taken the guesswork out. But we’ve taken out the confusion/analysis paralysis/FOMO. You get a holster that lets you get rockin’ and rollin’, locked and loaded, right away. You can still adjust it easily to your needs.

The Apollo is optic cut, has dual 1.5” belt clips, and adjustable ride height all as standard. Ambidextrous for all users, without any of the drawbacks or feature limitations found in other holsters. And before you ask, yes it is Enigma compatible.

With an initial launch covering the Glock G48/43X/43, SIG P365/P365X/P365XL, Smith & Wesson Shield Plus/1.0/2.0, and Springfield Armory Hellcat RDP we are focusing on the most popular and comfortable carry guns selling to most new owners. But don’t fret, following this launch Apollo will have plenty of your old favorites as well.

Now for the best part, especially for anyone who has waited to order previously when they saw that cart total. MSRP: $49.99, but this Black Friday launch features an introductory 20% off bringing it to $39.99!  

They’re in stock!  If you can place the order, they’re in stock.

the new dark star gear apollo holster with a sig sauer p365 in a wilson combat grip perfect no nonsense concealed carry setup

Nature Is Healing

In the last two weeks I happened to stop at two different big box outdoor stores for some reason or another. Honestly, it was primarily to check out the used gun counter. Especially because I like to gawk at the retail prices for used vintage Smith and Wesson revolvers or Colt 1911 autos and especially anything that is a USGI firearm. You’d think that the person responsible for pricing every M-1 Garand, M-1 Carbine or USGI M1911-A1 takes a hit from a crack pipe each time they fill out a new price label. Other times, these “gun rooms” just happen to have neat things that you don’t see every day, like a museum exhibit.

After I was done “browsing” at one store, I could not help but to notice the fact they had actual smokeless powders and also primers in stock and readily available. These weren’t behind any glass display case or out of reach to the public either—they were just on the shelf like the before times. Out of shock, I even picked up a one pound container of Hogdon H-335 just to make sure it wasn’t some empty display. No sir, when I picked it up I felt each of those seven thousand grains in that container. Then I grabbed the container of HP-38 next to it make sure it wasn’t a fluke. Same thing. All right, how about the 8lb jug above? Full. Damn.

The other store was much smaller, but I was also surprised to find containers of smokeless propellant freely available for purchase. I could not remember the last I saw something like that where it was not a coincidence.

And the primers! The first store I am referencing had actual primers there. Several one thousand count cartons. Not surprisingly, small pistol primers were sold out. I did notice small pistol magnum, small rifle, and small rifle magnum along with CCI BR-4s and Federal Small Rifle Gold Medal.

Not too thrilled with these prices, but at least these whomever needed them could actually buy them.

Nature is healing.

Seeing powder and primer on the shelves is a welcome sight to my weary eyes, but the downside are the new “stable” prices. The average price of a pound of powder is now $39.99, with a $12 difference from the last time I purchased any in early 2021. As for primers, it wasn’t long ago that a one thousand primer brick retailed for only $35-$40 dollars. The average price is now $89.99 be it small rifle, small pistol, etc. I noticed that the CCI BR-4s were selling for $149.99 while the Federal Gold Medal small rifle brick was now $99.99. While the new prices are a bummer to any of us who have been reloading, the bright side is that these supplies are now becoming easier to find.

The APC9 Lingle Industries Lower – Add Some Scorpion to Your APC9K

I absolutely love my B&T APC9K. It imbues me with a degree of elitism where I suddenly want to make fun of the ‘poors.’ Then I look at mag prices and realize, wait, I am the poors! B&T is damn proud of their magazines. They aren’t bad, but I don’t understand the 50-dollar price tag. Plus, it’s not like the aftermarket is helping them out as of right now. What’s a man to do? Well, he or she can turn to a company called Lingle Industries. 

Lingle produces a number of interesting lower options for a variety of guns. They make lowers for the APC9, as well as the Stribog, SCAR 16, SCAR 17, and BREN 2. With the APC9K, their lowers allow you to be more selective of your magazine choice, and Lingle makes a lower I couldn’t help but love. Their Scorpion lower for the APC9K allows me to use Scorpion mags. 

That’s awesome because I already own a Scorpion and a pile of magazines, and I can always get more at a good price. Don’t forget Magpul makes magazines for the Scorpion, and so does Mantis and PSA. Magpul even produces a D-50 drum in case you need some extra sting. The APC9K series serialize the upper receiver so you can purchase the lower and have it sent straight to your home. 

Breaking Down the Lingle Lower 

Obviously, the first big improvement is that it takes Scorpion magazines. That simplifies logistics. Second, instead of being polymer, it’s aluminum which is an interesting choice, and it works and looks good. The lowers come in numerous colors, and this is their FDE model. 

The Lingle lower uses a Scorpion magazine release that’s quasi-AK-like, and it comes with a Strike Industries mag release. The lower retains the best qualities of the APC9K lower, including total ambidexterity. It uses an AR pistol grip of your choice as well as a mostly AR 15 lower parts kit

The ergonomics are outstanding. Everything is easy to reach and very accessible. Magazines plop right out with a press of the release. The controls are large and easy to reach. The last-round bolt hold open is preserved, and I’d even argue the bolt release is easier to use on the Lingle than the regular lower. 

The Lingle In Action 

My biggest concern is taking a weapon that’s super reliable and making it less so. Luckily after a half dozen Scorpion magazines, I can say it’s not a concern I should have. The lower is crafted expertly, and it fits nice and tight on the gun without any reliability issues present. This is an example of their complete lower, and the trigger is awesome. It’s super light and tactile with no perceptible takeup. 

It’s a press, then a bang. The totally flat trigger is a nice touch as well. The Lingle Industries Scorpion lower breathed new life and lots more reload into my APC9K. Admittedly it took more than a few reload drills to get used to tossing Scorpion mags in. They seem to sit deeper. The magazine release is a completely different motion that takes some new connective tissue to get used to. 

Once the neurons fired up, I figured it out. Running reloads into the flared magwell isn’t difficult. I can slap one in and get a shot on target quickly and intuitively. 

Parting Shots

Of all the potential upgrades you can make to your APC9K, the Lingle lower ranks up there. It’s a drop-in installation, and it doesn’t cause any reliability issues. This lower opens up the market to cheaper, easier-to-find magazines of varying capacities. Paying 18 bucks for a magazine is a lot better than paying 50 per magazine, especially when I have to fill a chest rig full of them. 

Conventional Threats: Virginia Walmart Shooting

image of police response to Chesapeake va walmart shooting
Image via NBC News, Alex Brandon AP

From reports this morning a disgruntled employee at the Walmart in Chesapeake Virginia open fired on his coworkers last night, killing 6 before killing himself. Unlike the Club Q shooting, the details coming out of this one appear to be tragically straight forward. An employee of the company felt wronged and chose violence as his method of retribution rather than quitting.

‘Disgruntled Employee’ won’t make as many headlines for as long as ‘MAGA Republican lawmaker’s Non-Binary Grandson attacks LGBTQ Club’ and the fact the employee apparently used the three times as common, and therefore more boring, handgun will also result in a quickly fading national interest beyond what can be leveraged for more gun control.

Nothing will be widely delved into about the employee’s alleged grievances, nothing will emerge on to what extent they were valid or exaggerated. Nobody will acknowledge that the media frenzy around events like Club Q, and now Walmart, will remind people, including those who it is dangerous to remind, that violence is a very attention grabbing option and that choosing it grants infamy. Infamy is enough for those dangerous few.

But what we’re seeing here is a dangerous inversion of the threat matrix. Being shot on any given day, especially in a mass shooting is an unlikely event. But it is a highly dangerous one, more so than tripping and twisting your ankle walking around your pet. The pet is a much more present hazard with a low probability of death, but they represent a substantial amount of the trip injuries that ERs see.

What I am getting at is the threat matrix, also known more broadly as risk assessment. While risk assessment can be used for all physical, social, and financial risks, a threat assessment is more focused on actual physical threats to you or your entity.

What is the risk a car crashes through the front of the store? What are the odds it is accidental vs deliberate? What are the odds someone shoots at you at work? What is the breakdown on the odds that the shooter is an employee, a known customer, or a random? These are all threat matrix type questions and anyone who has worked in business and professional safety for awhile will acknowledge that the people you know, employees and customers, are the higher threat when it comes to violence in the workplace. But that said, the overwhelming majority of your efforts will be spent preventing accidents and not assaults. That is how the threat matrix breaks down.

The biggest enemy of the publicly accessible space is the preventable injury, not a crazy customer or an angry employee.

Appropriate Appreciation of the Threat

The media is going to continue to make Colorado the scarier event, propping up their pet theory for why a prominent locale that supports a media relevant and controversial current hot button like drag was attacked. This puts the weight of the ‘next’ attack seem like it will be more LGBTQ clubs, and there is an appreciable threat there from the attention, the attitudes, and the current interest from various extreme elements.

But for Pulse and Club Q, how many workplace violence incidents do we have? How many disgruntled employees who resorted to homicide, maybe not to a mass shooting level? At the mass shooting level I can think of about a half a dozen, probably more given time to go through a list.

The risk of the Walmart type event is much greater than Club Q, and just as dangerous.

That said, the risk of either event is both low and yet appreciable. The risk of deliberate violence should never be downplayed, which is what CNN seems to mistake here,

The shooting, which came two days ahead of Thanksgiving as customers were doing last-minute shopping, is yet another instance of how gun violence erupts in American life in places traditionally seen as safe, from schools to stores and even hospitals.

Places traditionally seen as safe are far from it, we just do not pay attention. They are safe in scale, they are reasonably safe, they certainly aren’t at the risk level of a drug house about to be raided by the police or the streets of Iran filled with protestors. But they are not and never have been ‘safe’ in the objective sense, only in the relative. It can only ever be in the relative sense, true objective safety where nothing bad can occur is impossible.

Yet we still parrot the line and pretend that it is, because it is inconvenient to all involved to worry about the reality that it isn’t.

Should you be concerned about being shot today? Yes. But with very likely the same risk you had yesterday and tomorrow, so take prudent steps. You should also worry about tripping over your pet with very likely the same risk window. That is how risk works.

Club Q: Another Gun Free Government Failure

image of police response at club Q colorado LGBTQ club shooting
image via FoxNews, TreyRuffy/Twitter

I’ve held off writing on this topic as I wanted as much information as feasible to go on before dissecting the midnight assault that killed 5 and wounded 18 in Colorado.

Timeline

11:56pm: A 22 year old man enters club Q with a long gun, probably semi-automatic given the injury counts, and begins firing. He is engaged quickly by club patrons of extraordinary courage and is subdued quickly.

12:00am: Police arrive

12:02am: Shooter is in custody.

This represents one of the quickest resolutions to an attack that we have on record.

Unarmed Resistance to an Armed Assailant

Armed resistance, firing back, was unavailable as an option under Colorado law. A bar is a gun free zone and the only exception would be employed armed security, a facet that would spoil the mood of a club meant to be a carefree safe space for the LGBTQ community. The likelihood of the left leaning LGBTQ club community developing a large enough interest in the profession of arms to harden their clubs and shape the laws to match is unfortunately unlikely. Public spaces, welcoming spaces, are impossible to truly harden.

But the community doesn’t lack courage and even in the face of the attack patrons didn’t wait for another Pulse to happen, where the government delivered an abysmal response to the attack and dozens bled to death.

Instead former Army Major Rich Fierro, Thomas James, and shortly after that one of the performers, closed with the shooter, yanked him down by his cheap armor or vest, and beat him into submission. The cops would be on scene and have the shooter in custody a couple minutes later.

Fierro said he just reacted, he attacked the shooter himself and started giving orders for support. The performer is said to have beat the shooter with a high heel to the face.

If you want to support Fierro after his heroic actions, his wife’s brewery sells pretty awesome merch.

Government Failure

The shooter was arrested the previous summer, 2021, for threatening his mother, law enforcement, and the community with a bomb in a multi-hour standoff with police. However the government did not prosecute any of these charges to a conviction, they dropped them all and to the best of our knowledge didn’t even commit the shooter.

The shooter by all accounts should have been the poster-child for criminal and mental prohibited person, the video of the police stand-off can be found online. But the government did not conclude this case with a prohibiting result. It may have not helped in the end, the shooter may still have had access to weapons, but the government did not put this man in a prison or a sleeveless coat after this incident and another incident occurred. The government didn’t do what they promise is supposed to prevent these events and this time 5 died and 18 were wounded.

The government is once again left holding an empty set of restraints for a person they knew about and the blood splatter upon the government visage is getting abhorrently incompetent. How many times must they fail in their promises?

The Renewed Call for a Ban on Assault Weapons

Despite these very obvious government failures, with an ugly feeling of being repeated, the Biden administration is already calling for the absurdly impossible ban on assault weapons. A ban which the government, with their lengthening list of failures, would be in charge of enforcing. The government which has shown themselves entirely inept in preventing these now wants you to trust them to stop “assault weapons” from doing bad things anymore by just making it more illegal.

They cannot be assed enough to prosecute the far smaller number of problematic people in the nation, but they’ll totally get all the guns. They promise.

The Uvalde Contrast.

It has been pointed out by many that a retired Army Major, an additional patron, and a drag queen did in less than four minutes what nearly 400 officers failed to do.

They did it unarmed too.

You cannot substitute a uniform for the will to act.

The Obvious Question

Motive.

We don’t have one yet. It could be the prominence of LGBTQ, especially Drag shows and their at times inappropriate association with young children in certain locales, media portrayal. Those instances are not the norm for these events, this specific midnight event was all adults and seems to have been rather indiscriminate in the killing. Abortion clinics have seen similar attacks, as have Christmas and Independence Day parades in recent times. No side holds the monopoly on their crazy people willing to go lone-wolf.

We don’t know if this was a target of convenience, a short-term lethal fixation on this topic and group where last year it was a stand-off with the police. This may be a longer and deeper prejudice. It has been noted the shooter’s grandfather is in congress, and a Republican, this has been used to delineate an “obvious” anti-LGBTQ motive putting aside just how different most grandchildren are from their grandparents.

Until and unless we find the rhetoric to support the conclusion that this was directed at the midnight Drag event because it was a Drag event we must remain open to the possibility that the shooter could have been motivated otherwise.

The likeliest theory however is this was a fixation, maybe one of several and unknown whether recently held or longer held. A triggered a violent ideation, not unlike the standoff which we saw from the shooter last year. Like the older abortion clinic attack it could be a retributive ideation, a likely motive, or it could be one more focused on directing attention to the shooter himself, which is also fairly common it attacks like this.

The likeliest, in my opinion, is it is a combination of the two. A delusion of needing to strike against a group that you’ve been told by your pocket “true” media is a threat to people, especially children, and a fixation on being the “hero” in that fight. The other likely scenario is the “fuck it” one where a high profile location, and LGBTQ club doing a Drag show would be among the highest profile locations at present, is chosen because of the coverage, attention, and turmoil it will cause, but without a retributive motive against the LGBTQ group specifically. This is similar in initial efforts to the self staged hate crimes, the location or group is picked to garner the attention, but where the self staged is usually a con for gain (think Jussie Smollett), this is a terror attack for attentions sake.

This could be a hate crime, very easily and very likely. This could also be a crime of attentive convenience, which in many ways is more sinister yet. If it is for attention itself, it plays to the media trends and the likeliest reactions. If this is the case, the current media circus of whether or not this was a hate crime is exactly the chaos and attention he wanted.

What Now

Praise the heroes. Praise Fierro, James, and all those who helped them. Praise the quick response of the police.

Then hold the prosecutor’s office, and the government at large, responsible for their failings. Do not let them sell you their snake oil gun control promise when they can’t be bothered to convict and imprison obviously problematic individuals, it will just be another thing for them to fail at.

A Disturbing Narrative

What I’ve noticed recently in online spaces is the consistent low key assumption by any definable group, whether it’s gamers, gun guys, or gays, that they are in particular being attacked. It is usually just a consequence of both algorithm and mods fighting off the truly abhorrent things that don’t get seen by many, the splash over is hitting legitimate content all the time and those instances get shared within their communities. The community gets more and more righteously indignant with each moderation mistake.

Moderating the online space is hard, ask Elon.

But the consensus of loosely or tightly correlated divisible groups that they are under special attack by the ‘powers that be’ or ‘other group’ seem to be manifesting in the small portion of the population within those groups that will react violently to the conclusion that they are being attacked. It is easy to justify fighting back. Even if they aren’t in objective terms, they believe they are and the belief is enough, in even one person properly motivated, to result in tragedy.

Those sentiments will then, unfortunately garner some portion of sympathy/understanding from their group, who feel attacked, even as they condemn the excess of violence. So both the attacker’s ‘group’ and the attacked ‘group’ feel some form of righteously aggrieved status, compounded by the algorithmically engaged media they are consuming on the subject, and more objective consensus on the event is less likely to result.

The LGBTQ groups and those supporting them are unlikely to see this as anything other than a hate crime, even if there is strong evidence this was an attack motivated by something else.

Conversely groups feeling they are catching the blame for this attack, and who felt in some way righteously aggrieved previously, are less likely to support the conclusion it was a hate crime, even if there is strong evidence to support the conclusion of a hate crime motivation.

The consistent online perception by multiple identifiable spaces, it seem most spaces in fact, that they are the target of discriminatory practices while another space is perceived as receiving special status is negatively contributing to the hostility in this nation between people who should otherwise get along amicably. Even if these people disagree, they should disagree as opponents and not adversaries or enemies. Digital social content, by targeting based upon interest, consequently tends to echo chamber your chosen affiliations.

This became most prominent to me recently as I explored a segment of the formerly religious, these groups of now atheist or agnostic people, with very legitimate grievances against segments of organized religion, also feel an aggrieved online status. The complaints levied by this group about their suppression, shadow bans, etc. could be copied and pasted into a hardline conservative space without edit. The same with gamers, gun guys, gays, streamers, you name the space and they probably have felt pressure.

We need to get some air, touch grass as they say these days. Get away from our algorithmically charged screen time and just hangout with our neighbors and communities. Realize that they are all folks just trying the best they can each day too and that so few of these people around us are actually a problem of any sort beyond the annoyance level.

Sure, evil exists. We saw it here and in the attack prior and in the attack next. We saw it as Putin crossed the border into Ukraine and as Iran open fired on their own people and the Kurds simultaneously. We’ve seen it before and we will see it again, we need to remain ready to punch it or shoot it in its stupid face as appropriate. But it isn’t half the nation. It isn’t half the world. We aren’t alone on these small echo chamber islands, most of us are frustrated by very similar things day in and day out.

We’re human.