Advertisement

Three Best Shotgun Red Dot Mounts

Let’s talk about mounting optics to shotguns. Sometimes it really does suck. Shotguns aren’t nearly as standardized as ARs, and mounting optics isn’t always the easiest thing to do. Today we are going to discuss the problem, as well as point you to three of the best shotgun red dot mounts on the market. 

The main problem is that the most common way to mount optics to shotguns is to toss on a Picatinny rail and then the optic. The problem here is that the red dots often sit higher than you’d like. Shotguns are close-range weapons, and you typically want the optic to sit as low as possible. You don’t want height over bore issues, and you want more of a cheek weld than a chin weld. 

Sometimes even the presence of just a rail and low mount sits the dot uncomfortably high. With that in mind, we’ve found three awesome options that will get you nice and low behind the dot. 

The Aridus CROM 

One of the best options comes from a small American shop known as Aridus Industries. They provide some top-notch awesomeness in the form of their shotgun accessories. The CROM shotgun red dot mounts are designed with cowtinessing in mind. CROM stands for Co-Witness Ready Optic Mount. 

This places a slot for a rear sight on the optic’s mount, and Aridus uses the XS rear sight setup to make it work.

This is a peep sight, but there is also a Rob Haught modification that cuts the top half off for faster shooting. In front of that rear sight sits your optic’s mount. 

Aridus manufactures these mounts with Picatinny rails and allows you to pick a specific footprint to directly mount your optic to the gun. Aridus makes these mounts for Remington 870, Beretta 1301, and Mossberg 500 shotguns. The optic footprints include the Trijicon RMR and Aimpoint Micro. 

The Scalarworks Sync Mount 

Scalarworks is well known for producing some awesome AR height mounts for all your red dot needs. So much so that a lot of people sadly don’t even realize the Sync mounts exist for their favorite scattergun. The Sync mounts are very simply designed and use a footprint-based mount to attach the optic as low as possible to your shotgun. 

With most guns, these with cowtiness with the existing sights. For example, on the Benelli M4, it sits just lower enough for great co-witnessing.

However, on certain guns like the Mossberg 590, you may have to remove the ghost ring to mount it. These rugged machine mounts are ultra lightweight and designed with shotguns in mind. 

Shotguns are brutal, violent weapons, and Scalarworks uses an innovative mounting system designed to help shake off recoil and resist any form of loosening when you get into those high round counts. These mounts are available for the Benelli M4/M2/SBE, the Remington 870, and Mossberg 500 series and use either Aimpoint micro or the RMR footprint. These shotgun red dot mounts attach cleanly and are tough to boot. 

The KE Arms Shotgun Red Dot Mount 

The Aridus Crom and Scalarworks Sync aren’t the cheapest options. If you want a quality-made design that won’t leave your wallet empty, look no further than the KE Arms Shotgun red dot mount. These simple mounts mate to the receiver and provide a footprint-based platform. 

They are made for the Mossberg 500, 930, and Remington 870 shotguns. These mounts accommodate the RMR, Delta Point Pro, and Aimpoint Micro footprints.

These all metal mounts get the optic super low. This makex it easy to use your standard stocks without the need for a chin weld. 

The KE Arms mounts cost less than 70 bucks and mount with absolute ease. The KE Arms Shotgun mount provides a simple, but robust and well made series of shotgun red dot mounts. 

Shotgun Red Dot Mounts – Blast Away 

Shotgun red dot mounts should aim to get the optic low and easy to use with a nice, stable cheek weld. The mounts listed above are superbly well made and are the best I’m currently aware of. As a shotgun nerd, I’m constantly upgrading and experimenting with my scatter guns, and maybe this list will grow. For now, those are the best options you have. 

Shotgun Basics: Why Cruiser-Ready Is A Good Idea

Left image: A Remington 870 pump action police shotgun sits in an officer’s shotgun rack in his cruiser. Note the Aridus side-saddle, dot, and crimson colored Federal Flite-Control hulls. It looks like this officer has probably had one or more professional shotgun training courses under his belt.

The majority of shotguns available today for self and home defense typically have some type of safety that prevents the trigger from moving back far enough to break a shot off. However, these safeties may not prevent a shotgun from discharging a chambered shotshell. If the shotgun is accidentally dropped or gets knocked around there is a chance that a chambered shell could be discharged because shotgun designs do not have drop safeties or firing pin blocks. While the chances of such accidental discharges are probably lower with more modern shotguns in good mechanical condition, the chance is never 0% either.

Shotguns are not “Drop Safe” the way handguns are.

The same reason shotguns are excellent defensive tools is also the same reason that makes them extremely dangerous if mishandled and not respected: their devastating payloads. Mitigating any accidental shotgun blast, no matter how small the chances is never a bad idea. This is why keeping a shotgun in cruiser-ready condition is a best-practice for those who rely on shotguns to defend themselves, others, or property.

“Cruiser-ready” specifically refers to a shotgun that is kept with an empty chamber but fully loaded magazine tube. In order to press a cruiser-ready shotgun into service, its action must be cycled manually. More specifically, cruiser-ready describes the actual way that police shotguns were stowed in police cars back in the day (and continue to be stowed now). Originally, this term was directly connected to pump-action shotguns, as these were and remain the most prevalent type of shotgun used for police duties. Over the years, many a misfortunate officer or deputy quickly learned what could happen to the roof or trunk of his car if he drove around with a loaded and chambered shotgun after running over potholes, rail road tracks or other nasty obstacles that go bump in the day or night. It did not take long to determine that keeping the shotgun with an empty chamber was the best way to drive around with it.

Another intelligently set up police shotgun in a cruiser rack. Notice the blue hulls of the Federal Tru-Ball slugs.

Any manually activated repeating shotgun pump-action or otherwise (at GAT, we are inclusive and have not forgotten about the Winchester Model 1887) is put into cruiser-ready by simply loading the magazine tube but not charging the action. If needed, the user must cycle the action, no matter what. There are two schools of thought regarding the storage of pump-action shotguns in the cruiser-ready condition. One camp of users prefers to leave their pump-action shotguns with the hammer “down” and the action unlocked (as if they had just fired a shot but not cycled the action). Their desire is to be able to grab the shotgun and immediately rack it. The other camp insists on keeping a shotgun cocked and locked with an empty chamber (Condition 3). They will hit the action-release lever to unlock the gun as they rack it every time. Many police officers are taught this method or personally prefer it, as an unlocked pump-action shotgun’s fore-end can move around while the shotgun is cradled in a cruiser rack and the vehicle is in motion. There is no right or wrong way, as long as you environment and equipment support it, and this boils down to personal context and specific circumstances.

Semi-auto shotguns are made cruiser-ready by loading their magazine tubes and then releasing a shell to rest on the shell carrier. To prepare for firing all one needs to do is to pull the charging handle back and let it fly. Regardless whether a semi-auto shotgun is driven by inertia or cycled by gas (or long recoil operated for that matter), there is only one way to store them in cruiser ready condition and one way to get them into action. Again, after loading the magazine tube, one must release a shell onto the carrier and make sure it stays there until its time to shoot. Most semi-automatic shotguns have cut-outs or slits on their shell carriers, so it is extremely easy to visually check for shells and make sure these shotguns are truly cruiser-ready.

Employing a cruiser-ready system for one’s shotguns also provides a generalized manual of arms for making any shotgun ready to fire. By following this practice, shotgun shooters can get into the habit of always cycling their shotgun’s actions before use and reduce any confusion or hesitation regardless of action type or model. Pick up the gun. Disengage the safety. Cycle the action. Ready. Shotguns make excellent defensive tools but handling them poorly can bring devastating consequences, so even if the probability for an accidental discharge (yes, accidental, a shotgun fired by inertia in a trunk or a vehicle rack was an accident) might be low, why not add an additional degree of safety to these awesome but also devastating tools?

Gun Law “Arbitrary and Capricious”

Bruce Blakeman Doesn't Like New Gun Law
Photo Credit: Dan Brinzac

Nassau County (on Long Island, just across from New York City) executive Bruce Blakeman didn’t hold back today when announcing that 200 new gun permit applications since the state’s strict new gun law making it nearly impossible to legally carry concealed. He called it arbitrary and capricious, referencing the standard test of a law under judicial review of the same name. In essence, the phrase suggests the law in question is baseless or despotic in nature, or a sudden turn of mind without apparent motive.

The gun law itself (championed by NY Governor Hochul) enacts, among other onerous restrictions, a ban on otherwise legally carrying citizens from bringing their gun into still poorly defined and nebulous “sensitive areas” like churches, and schools. The law only went into effect a month ago, on September 4, but in the mere 30 days since, 200 people have submitted applications for gun permits. The county has only had 1350 permit applications so far this year, which means September saw permit applications rise by over 33%.

Mr. Blakeman went on to promise that until litigation already in progress has rightfully determined this new gun law unconstitutional, which he believes it is, he and law enforcement will do their best to work within the legal framework given to them to serve the citizens of Nassau county. He goes on to explain that the law does nothing to make people safer, and simply makes law abiding citizens more likely to unintentionally break the law.

Gunday Brunch 72: The Glock AR15 is Real

Jack is currently getting a full body blood transfusion after going into the woods with a spooky goth girl, so Caleb and Keith are left to their own devices to discuss the new Glock AR15 that has been floating around the internet.

The Browning Automatic Rifle/ High Power Rifle

This is a modern .308- a great rifle in a different role!

I think that among the least appreciated hunting rifles in America is the BAR- at least in the popular press. The BAR or Browning Automatic Rifle is well represented by those who actually use their rifles. Don’t confuse the modern BAR ‘High Power’ rifle with the war winning BAR. This is a different animal. Sure the sporting gun resembles all Browning rifles with its slight humpback but it operates differently. This is a relatively light rifle well suited to hunting chores. While the BAR is a fine hunting rifle it doesn’t have to have a role to fill, it just must please the owner. And that it does.

The rifle illustrated resembles the modern BAR but left the factory some fifty five years ago. It doesn’t get a lot of use and the little wear is honest wear from carrying the rifle. It is lovingly oiled and maintained after every range or field trip and probably has less than one thousand cartridges through it. While there are many calibers in the BAR line this is among the most powerful. I like a good .308 but the extremely strong .300 Winchester Magnum offers many good options for taking large game. The rifle has proven reliable and is accurate enough for most hunting chores to a long 300 yards, perhaps a bit more with a quality optic and an experienced shooter. It isn’t as accurate as a good bolt action rifle but then for what it was designed to do it is plenty accurate. As an example with the inexpensive PPU loading I put three shots into 1.86 inch at 100 yards, while the Federal and Hornady loads tested were closer to 1.25 inch, with an average of 1.6 inches for the premium loads. Don’t use PPU for hunting. The bullet is underdeveloped. It is a fine practice load and proved reliable.

While the rifle is very attractive with deep blue finish and walnut furniture the internals are well finished as well. The bolt features seven rugged locking lugs. The rifles handles quickly and comes to the shoulder easily and gets on target fast. A big surprise came when firing the rifle. I have fired a couple of .300 Magnum bolt action rifles, full size rifles with plenty of weight. They beat me up. My fillings were not jarred out but nearly so! The BAR’s self loading action soaks up much of the recoil. It is a pleasant experience to fire this rifle. The adjustable rear sight and post front offer a precise sight picture. While optics would be better I am well up in middle age and still don’t need eyeglasses so I will stick with iron sights for the time being. The 24 inch barrel offers maximum velocity and a good sight radius.

These old Belgian rifles with their hammer forged barrels are sought after. Just the same the newer guns are at least as accurate and offer a good buy in today’s world. The gas operated action is the same as the original with operating rods driving an inertia block to operate the rifle. These rifles are reliable, more so than other sporting self loaders, and are long lived without a need for repair. If you need a rifle that handles about as quickly as a well balanced shotgun and is more comfortable to fire than a bolt gun in the same caliber and offers an instant follow up shot the BAR may be your best bet.

Caliber: .300 Winchester Magnum
Barrel: 24 inches
Length: 45 inches
Weight: 8 pounds
Stock: High Grade Walnut
Sights: Fixed post front adjustable rear
Capacity: 3+1

The .300 Winchester Magnum cartridge-

150 grains – 3300 fps

165 grains – 3100 fps

180 grains – 3050 fps

No, Firearms Aren’t a Public Health Concern

The New York Times published an 11-minute documentary in June titled “‘It Was Really a Love Story.’ How an N.R.A. Ally Became a Gun Safety Advocate,” which tells a heartwarming story of how friendship transcended political differences and convinced a right-wing partisan to come to terms with the truth about firearms.

The film stars a couple of improbable friends: Dr. Mark L. Rosenberg, who for many years oversaw research on gun violence at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as the director of its National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, and “NRA Pointman” Rep. Jay Dickey (R–Ark.), who was the author of an amendment inserted into a 1996 spending bill that prohibited the CDC from using federal funds to advocate for gun control.

The story is also framed by the findings of a famous (or infamous) 1993 CDC-funded study, which was “the first piece that we funded by external scientists,” Rosenberg recounts. It allegedly showed that owning guns made Americans overwhelmingly less safe. According to the film, the National Rifle Association (NRA) lobbied for the Dickey Amendment because of the 1993 study’s damning results. The organization “didn’t think it would be good for business,” Rosenberg says, “and they went to Congress, and they said, ‘You have got to stop this research because it’s going to result in all Americans losing their right to have a gun in their homes.'”

Reason’s video above, in response to the NYT’s video they are referencing, goes into why firearms are not a public health concern. Not that they shouldn’t be studied, or documented, or researched, simply that it makes no sense to treat them like the flu and research the like a contagion.

Firearms are not a virus anymore than a power drill or a kitchen knife is. Firearms are a tool, a weapon, and have a specific series of purposes in polite society. A virus doesn’t, it is an unavoidable force of nature that we battle against in a logical manner by limiting its ability to spread through proper behaviors and immunizations.

Now in that regard, fighting gun violence and fighting a virus sound similar. But that is only until you get into methodology. A virus doesn’t have motivation in the cognitive sense, it is a base organism whose mutations survive in proper hosts. A virus too lethal kills itself by killing its host population, a virus too easy to kill and not fast enough in its mutations dies off as a population naturally becomes immune to it.

Those factors do not translate to the causes of “gun violence” since that title actually encompasses a few not interrelated events and outcomes.

  • Homicide, planned
  • Homicide, unplanned
  • Homicide, accidental
  • Suicide
  • Assault with injury
  • Assault without injury
  • Injury, accidental

Seven separate human motivated events, zero that can be solved by washing you hands and seeing a doctor regularly. We can debate doctors visits preventing suicide, but the rates seem to suggest annual physicals aren’t influencing the triggers as much as folks choosing to seek and being able to fairly smoothly receive help for their mental health status.

Human motivations are not virologic, despite what Hugo Weaving may have said in the Matrix. Human motivations follow logical progressions of effort for result. Even if we cannot emotionally understand a given motive, or do so with traditional logic of a balanced and normative outlook, that logic train is there.

Because of *perception of situation or event* I will *action* is basic human behavior, situation, decision, reaction. It should not and cannot be treated like a virus, because it is not one. Treating it like one will not yield informative or effective results for prevention and deterrence, because you cannot ‘catch’ gun violence by failing to wash your hands. You ‘catch’ it, catching a bullet is a common phrase, by someone being violent deliberately to you or in your proximity. You are affected by deliberate action only. This is one of the crucial flaws with the numerous studies RAND rejected over and over again, they take human motivations out of the variable pool and treat firearms like they are radioactive and might trigger cancer.

Proximity to alcohol does not trigger drunk driving, the combination of decisions to drink it to inebriation and then to operate a vehicle do. Decision, then consequence. These decisions are not made in a vacuum either, decisions are made in a field of parallel and sometimes competing decisions.

Removing human free agency from our equations is poor stats building and won’t help us. We have several human behavior tracks we must address, I outlined them roughly above. It is in addressing these motivations that we will improve the levels of violence in our communities.

How To Camouflage Your Pack – Practical Fieldcraft

A while back, I wrote an article called Reject Operating, Embrace Soldiering and since then, I’ve become fascinated with those old-school fieldcraft skills. I always enjoyed this part of Marine Corps training, but admittedly it was often put on the back burner compared to the skills needed to deal with IEDs, clearing rooms, and other common GWOT infantry tasks. Today we are going to talk about a very important skill to have, and that’s camouflaging. Specifically, we want to talk about how to camouflage your pack. 

Unlike most of your gear, your pack can be easily camouflaged without disrupting its intended use. Your pack is also one of those items that might not be carried at all times and might be something left behind. When it’s day 105 of being a Wolverine fighting the Russians, your sustainment pack might stay home. A mess of packs sitting around is an easy way for your enemy to know where you bed down, your numbers, equipment, and all sorts of valuable information. 

Let’s prevent that by applying a little camouflage.  

Hasty and Deliberate 

There are two methods to camouflage your pack. One is hasty and adaptable to your environment and utilizes minimal preparation. The second is a deliberate, planned method of camouflage that requires a fair bit of preparation. Hasty is a temporary measure that will require a constant update. Deliberate has the benefits of lasting longer but being less adaptable to environments. 

Let’s break down both methods. 

The Hasty Camouflage Method 

Hasty camouflage can be as simple as decorating your pack with some local vegetation, but we aim to be a little more precise than that. The preparation for hasty camouflage is simple and relies on a little bit of 550 cord. Today you meet the tie-tie. A tie-tie is a piece of 550 cord tied to your pack designed to hold local vegetation to effectively camouflage the pack. 

Tie-ties range in length between 8 and 14 inches. You then use a clove hitch to secure these tie-ties to your pack. They wrap around MOLLE nickels and hang down to provide various points for tying on vegetation to help camouflage your pack. 

As you move to a new area, you need to examine the local vegetation and what’s common. This will allow you to smartly camouflage your pack. Don’t gather all of your material from one area. A big gap in vegetation is obvious to observers. Gather the vegetation over a wide area and avoid hacking like a madman with a machete. 

Tie this vegetation to your pack and ensure it blends in well with the environment, and you’re good to go. Remember, this vegetation will die and wither, so it needs to be changed out regularly. Dispose of your old vegetation correctly and scatter it rather than just dump it in a pile. 

Deliberate Camouflage 

Deliberate camouflage involves a bit more preparation. This method does not rely on native materials but can be supplemented by them. Good camouflage goes a long way, and a little prep makes it a bit easier to blend in. 

You can use additional materials like camouflage netting or burlap and juke to create artificial camouflage. A ghillie blanket or similar item takes time and effort to prepare. While not difficult, it is time-consuming. Construction requires patience, lots of typing, and dying the material to match the environment around you. Cami netting is often an easier method, but a ghillie-style camouflage is more adaptable to individual environments. 

While not absolutely necessary, you can toss on some natural vegetation to help break up the shape and supplement the natural look to the pack. 

Keeping Camouflage 

Camouflage is an art form. Learning how to properly hide yourself and your gear can be lifesaving ultimately and help you and your gear stay hidden. It’s a skill you have to practice to learn, and admittedly I’m out of practice. However, it’s a fairly cheap skill to invest your time in, and with the cost of ammo, it’s a good time to work on your soft skills. 

Gun Regulation in NY: More And Worse

New York Seeks To Regulate "Bulk" Ammo Sales

New York has really been knocking it out of the park with more ridiculous and random gun regulation, largely focused on ownership and carry this year. Seemingly spurred on by SCOTUS’ Bruen verdict, they have been windmilling for months, while (likely unsuccessfully) attempting to skirt it.

The Bruen decision, you’ll recall, stated that New York’s “May-issue” concealed carry permitting scheme was unconstitutional, by virture of the 2A giving Americans a right to carry arms in public for self defense, and the fact that there is no American tradition of gun regulation that justifies New York’s proper cause requirement. NY State has spent the time since the decision doing everything they can to get around, or simply ignore that verdict with onerous, malicious, or random gun regulations attempting to intimidate people away from concealed carry and gun ownership however they think they can, in the name of “safety”. So what are they doing this time?

The bill in question directs the NY State Police to “develop regulations pertaining to the bulk purchase of firearms or ammunition and flagging those bulk purchases for further review for the purpose of investigating potential criminal activity.” How, or what standard will be used to determine what “bulk” ammunition purchases are is entirely unknown. Equally ethereal is the answer to the seemingly unasked question of “Where will the manpower and budget to monitor these purchases and enforce these regulations come from?”.

But it’s fairly apparent that the issue at hand isn’t bulk firearms purchases, concealed carry, or anything else gun related. It’s more likely an attempt at showing the voter base that keeps these people in office that they are “doing something” in the face of what they perceive as a hostile, politicized supreme court. This is street busking for votes, at best. If this was about control through gun regulation, they’d have an actual plan for how to implement and enforce this bill, which it would not surprise us to learn the State Police were not consulted or informed of prior to its writing.

FILE: “This only happens in the US…” “Only cops should have guns…”

BANGKOK, Oct 6 (Reuters) – A former policeman killed 38 people, including 22 children, in a knife and gun rampage at a daycare centre in Thailand on Thursday, later shooting dead his wife and child at their home before turning his weapon on himself, police said.

The children at the daycare centre in Uthai Sawan, a town 500 km (310 miles) northeast of Bangkok, were mostly stabbed to death, they said.

Police identified the attacker as a former member of the force who was dismissed from his post last year over drug allegations and he was facing trial on a drugs charge. Read on.

So here we are again, breaking all the alleged rules of gun violence. A police officer, no former does not matter here as we entrusted this man with community protection and enforcement of the law, went to the daycare center of his child and upon finding that child already at home went on a killing spree against the staff, children, and finally home to his wife and child, ending with suicide.

An event we are constantly shilled as happening only here. Despite the last two major ones happening in Russian and now Thailand, those facts would be casually dismissed as neither of those nations are seen as “civilized” in these conversations. We can’t expect non-violence out of them after all, they’re savages who don’t know better. We use the same excuse for inner city violence but nobody likes talking about that either.

Russia may be at war with Ukraine. The RUAF and their partners have committed war crimes against the Ukrainian people, but that doesn’t make a former student gunning down students at his school, wearing a swastika, with a converted pistol, any less horrific an event. The fact that this Thai officer was under investigation doesn’t mean that the nation hadn’t entrusted him with the very thing that gun control proponents here state should be the sole power of the government.

We see government atrocities and personal atrocities by government officials abusing their powers constantly, and yet the argument remains that we should give the monopoly of violence to this repeatedly provably fallible entity instead of keeping the power of force distributed.

The concept of an armed society is not the naïve belief that nobody will misuse force, it is that a misuse of force can never rise to a catastrophically one sided level. That can and has happened repeatedly throughout history when a group has a force monopoly, legitimate or otherwise. Look at the Taliban in Afghanistan right now, they weren’t elected, the population doesn’t like them. They have to accept them though, as the group with the monopoly on violence. The elected government crumbled and the small pockets of tribal resistance do not appear to be in a position to reassert a more popular and legitimate form of governing monopoly at this time.

But back to Thailand…

Stress from what may have been an entirely legal and fair trial triggered a massacre. The choice of the former officer, perhaps made as he went to the daycare, perhaps triggered by not finding his child there, was catastrophic. But in either case of choice, the government failed to stop it and could not stop it without preemptively imprisoning this man, which could have caused a myriad of other issues that were probably risk weighed as to why this former officer was not in prison awaiting trial.

Gun controllers will, once again, point to this as an example of what or why or how their pet policy would be better, despite the complexities of human behaviors making their rubber stamp, one dimensional, “this’ll fix it!”, ideas not standing up to the machinations of a single motivated mind.

We have laws that declare nearly identical firearms safe or dangerous based on fractions of an inch, the listed purpose of a threaded on muzzle device that deflects gas, by whether or not you can put your thumb around a grip to the other side, or by whether or not the stock can be adjusted to fit your body. It’s equivalent to declaring a car safe or dangerous by the shape of its door handles and whether or not its seat can adjust. It’s stupid, and we have political factions dedicated blindly to the stupidity. All this effort… and it won’t do a thing.

Shotgun Basics: Shotgun Casino Drill

Courtesy of Tom Givens, the Shotgun Casino Drill is a nifty exercise involving four different targets set up at a distance of seven yards. The first target requires one shot, the second target requires two, the third three, and the fourth four in this exact order. The drill is set up so that shooters will have to intentionally reload at some point in between addressing all targets. Targets must be engaged the requisite number of times and in the correct order to shoot this drill cleanly. A total of ten shotshells are required and the par time for the Shotgun Casino Drill is 30 seconds. Any standard IPSC classic or metric target or IDPA paper target will suffice. However, 8-inch steel plates would be ideal as shotgun ammunition destroys paper and cardboard in short order. (Steel targets become especially handy if you are planning to run this drill several times or if you are shooting this drill with multiple training partners or maybe as part of a shotgun course).

To shoot the Shotgun Casino Drill, shooters must start at the firing line with four shells loaded in their shotgun’s magazine tube. Upon the timer’s start sound, the shooter will engage each of the four targets in the correct order and will have to reload their shotgun as needed in any order they deem appropriate. Once again a clean run means that each target received the correct amount of shots in the correct order and with no misses. The array of targets can be placed in any order down range but each target should be visibly marked with its specific number. To mix things up, targets may also be shuffled around as desired.

Nate from That Shotgun Blog shows us how to execute the Shotgun Casino Drill properly.

This skill building drill is useful due to the fact that it does not require a large amount of ammunition nor is it too complex to set up. Only four targets are needed either at a pistol bay or in front of any suitable backstop. The Shotgun Casino Drill is useful in that in order to efficiently negotiate it, it requires a solid shooting mount in addition to proper recoil control and loading technique. After all, there are two main categories of skills needed to successfully employ a shotgun. One category pertains to the mental aspect of thinking while holding a shotgun, and the other category pertains to the mechanical skills required to shoot a shotgun proficiently. Incidentally, the Shotgun Casino Drill calls on these same skills: proper shotgun mounting, recoil control, and efficient loading. Give it a try next time you hit the range, as running a shotgun as fast as you safely can is a ton of fun!

Idaho POST Shotgun Manual – A Free Beginners Guide

Good information is often worth the money to obtain, and that’s why instructors don’t teach classes for free. Sometimes you can get a little lucky, and I felt a little lucky when I stumbled across the Idaho POST Shotgun Manual. I constantly like to try my hands at various drills and firearm qualifications from police and military forces. That’s when I stumbled onto the Idaho Post Shotgun Manual. 

I’m not an expert on police manuals by any means and have never been in law enforcement. However, I know a fair bit about shotguns, and as I read this manual, I realized just how full of information it was. It’s an awesome guide and is perfect for the first-time shotgun owner. The manual isn’t perfect but covers a ton of ground in regards to the martial application of shotguns. 

The Idaho POST Shotgun Manual – Origin Story 

The origin story starts on the first page, which tells a brief history of the manual. It was started in 1986 by a retired Police Sergeant. The manual is based on a manual written by Jeff Cooper and passed out to students at a Combat Shotgun course at the American Pistol Institute. Over time the manual evolved and adapted with the times and features work from various local, state, and federal police agencies and men like Clint Smith and Jeff Cooper.

The Idaho POST Shotgun Manual is a very dense forty pages. It’s chock full of awesome information that relates to using the shotgun effectively. I was continually surprised as I read the manual and saw how much information they packed into those 40 pages. The information is easy to understand and well illustrated by pictures of the actions described. 

I found myself learning a few things that I had never considered. It’s not that I see myself as a shogun guru, but I’m surprised a beginner’s shotgun manual goes this far in-depth and does it so efficiently. I want to reiterate this is on the tactile use of a shotgun. Bird hunters aren’t likely to find much to use in this manual. 

What the Idaho POST Shotgun Manual Covers 

We dive right into information with facts and myths about shotguns, and then we get into how to use the shotgun. This includes how to carry the gun, how to store the gun, its various conditions, and more. By page eight, we are digging into the hands-on portion of the manual. 

Here we cover a press check method I was unfamiliar with that wisely relies more on top than looking. While visual checks work, you might not always have the lighting to conduct a visual check. In that situation, this tactile check is easy to do and a sure way to know the status of your shotgun. 

We dig into how to use the gun and what each hand is responsible for, as well as how to load the weapon. This includes how to port load and tube laid the gun. The focus is on loading the gun in a tactical manner. 

The Idaho POST Shotgun Manual goes on to cover malfunctions, stance, ready positions, patterning, and even a multitude of sling carry methods. It’s full of great information. Some feel a little silly. When am I ever going to use the Safari method of aligning in 2022? Especially on a tactical shotgun? The same goes for a portion on the Olympic Offhand shooting position with a tactical shotgun. 

Other information that changed my attitude is the portion on double kneeling. I never considered how much easier it is to peak around cover from a double kneeling position. I know how to pattern, but the manual provides a simple but detailed means to do, so that explains patterning very well. 

 

Where I Found It Lacking 

The Idaho POST Shotgun Manual is very much worth a read. The main thing the manual didn’t cover enough of, at least to me, is recoil mitigation. It’s mentioned, but the Push/Pull technique is never even brought up. It’s one of the most effective ways to control a shotgun. 

The manual also advises shooters to use a chicken wing-like technique. I’m not the type to immediately lose their mind about someone using a chicken wing technique, especially with older guns. However, with modern shotguns and tactical gear, the chicken can be difficult to accomplish. Doing so with armor and a reduced LOP stock is likely to feel fairly awkward. 

Other than that, the manual is robust and chock full of great information. It’s a PDF and completely free. Click here to access it. (PDF Warning.) 

Someone… LIKES the L85?

Our favorite Brit service member turned Canuck service member, who usually talks tanks and planes and stuff, is talking about the L85A1 and A2 that he legitimately used.

And… he liked it.

Now the original had its issues, many many issues, BUT after H&K tightened it back up to a working project… it was, a working project. Essentially an AR-18, which literally everyone is building around now including the M5. So, is the modern L85A3 a mistake? Probably not, it could still use some changes to the controls especially, but probably not a mistake.

Why I am sharing this is Matsimus points out the space advantages that bullpups give in both room clearing and a vehicle, which he deployed inside. He’s also giving the point of view of a soldier, just a regular soldier and not a multi-platform expert shooter, and how well being handed and drilled on a service rifle was. This point of view can be felt on the M4 also, our domestic bias for the M4 is strong and we attribute things to the basic M4 that are actually only features on well tuned up models with good ammunition. But we still love our M4’s even our M16’s, just because we do.

He describes the same problems (in reverse) going from the L85 to the C7A2 as most people describe, and disliking, going from AR’s to bullpups. They really are two different ergonomic animals. From a service rifle user, a normalized user perspective, seeing that he was handed and told to use both platforms in the same fashion (as in not getting a choice) the perspective feels grounded in that what does it really mean when this rifle is what you get.

So no, I won’t be recommending the L85A3 to anyone as a premier 21st century service rifle without peer. I don’t think many folks out there are going to disagree with me either. But I am of the opinion on this day in 2022 that if I were to pick up or be handed an L85 I’d make it work. Just like an AK, or an AR that wasn’t kitted my way, or a G3 or FAL. It works as long as I work and it beats a sharp stick, the better I work with it the better it works.

So shelve the internet lore next to the many grains of salt and until I get to work with one I’ll reserve final judgement. Kind of like VHS-2 now that we’re thinking about it.

Mantis: The Blackbeard X – Carbine Dry Fire Upgraded

Mantis has been a leader in motion dry fire and livefire tech for the shooting world. Their products are practical, innovative, and accessible. With the release of the Blackbeard laser and trigger reset system for the AR platforms they aggressively expanded their firearm coverage for dry fire and assisted drills. With two screens you could run both a Mantis X and Laser Academy. But the Mantis X was, even with some tuned settings, optimized for a handgun.

mantis blackbeard x training system for AR15 rifles carbines and SBRs to practice dry fire assisted

The Blackbeard X is optimized for the carbine and removes a hardware installation step. The new Blackbeard X magazine system powers the trigger reset and laser like the legacy system and now talks with the Mantis X training app via Bluetooth to capture that motion data. It also comes with several new carbine drills, accessible when the magazine talks with your phone or tablet.

Upgrade

Yes, the title said upgrade. The laser blasting and trigger resetting carrier system hasn’t changed. The magazine did.

Mantis will be offering an upgrade program for those who want to change their magazine to the new X enabled system.

Simplification is the key to success

Mantis recognizes human nature. The more steps to do a thing the less likely we are to do it, or to do it as much as we should.

The Mantis X app and Laser Academy both operate on phones, and do so well, because we keep our phones around us all the time. This vastly simplifies the logistics of assisted dry fire or data gathering live fire.

The Blackbeard X is that same theory, consolidating the resources of the Mantis X and Laser Academy into a single assembly. You will still need two screens if you want to run both programs, but I tend to use the laser as a simple POI more often than with the interactive targets of the Laser Academy system. Again, I do the simply thing more often.

I don’t have to attach the Mantis X censor to my carbine to run it now, it is the powerpack. Mantis has removed a setup step from my dry fire routine, consequently I’m more likely to use the systems when I dry fire because they made it easier. Using social sciences for good! The more tasks we stack the more people drop off from doing them, so ask less and deliver more. We build websites this way for a reason, we should absolutely be taking advantage of that for skill building.

There are no substitute or short cuts in skill building, but we do many unnecessary extraneous items that are not skill building. They waste time, effort, and do not contribute to the skill honing activity. Setup and teardown.

Blackbeard X vastly simplifies setup and teardown while providing carbine specific benefits in the program. You get more for the same effort.

They’re out now, Order or Upgrade here.

The Ares FMG the First Folding SMG

Ever since Magpul showed the FMG-9 at SHOT Show 2008, there has been quite a bit of hoopla built around the folding submachine gun. It’s covert, futuristic, and looks like something James Bong would approve of. This was revitalized recently, with Magpul announcing the FDP and FDC 9 and now B&T showing off their P320-based BCW folding platform. For a lot of people, the folding SMFG is new, but for me, it’s an old hat because of the Ares SMG and Syphon Filter 3. 

I was a huge Syphon Filter fan, and it’s actually one of the games that got me interested in firearms. The third game had the Marz FMG, which I later found out was, in reality, the Ares FMG. You see, Magpul didn’t invent the idea of a folding PDW-style SMG. It dates back to the 1980s and would continue through the 90s and even become an international niche weapon. It all starts with the Ares FMG. 

Early Origins of the Ares FMG 

Who exactly is Ares? A few companies have used the name in the firearms industry. Ares being the god of war, seems to attract arms manufacturers. Ares Inc was a small company founded by Robert Bihun and Eugene Stoner in 1971. They were an innovative company and way ahead of their time. 

In 1984 they were the first to attempt to develop lighter ammunition and cut the weight of 50 BMG rounds by 33% by using plastic-cased telescoped ammunition. They designed guns, ammo, and even internal parts to improve existing systems. In 1985 they developed the Ares FMG, FMG standing for Folding Machine Gun. A man named Francis Warin of Oak Harbor designed the gun. 

The idea was simple. Provide a concealable, covert weapon that delivers more firepower than a pistol. The weapon would be discrete and not appear to be a gun until it was ready to fire. It was designed to be a businessman’s defensive weapon and was inspired by a number of kidnappings that occurred in South America at the time. 

The Ares FMG folded in half, with a hollow stock encapsulating the grip and magazine when the weapon folded. It was a little larger than a carton of cigarettes and designed to resemble radios of the time. 

Breaking down the Ares FMG 

There were only ever two Ares FMGs ever made. Both are considered prototypes. The first used an MP28 magazine that had been trimmed to allow the weapon to fold. The second utilized Uzi magazines that made folding a nonissue. The first prototype lacked a trigger guard and placed the charging handle on top of the weapon. The second had a trigger guard and used a charging handle at the bottom of the gun that doubled as a finger guard. 

The weapons lacked sights and were selective fire. These guns personified spray and pray. The Ares FMG was a 9mm weapon with a 6.75-inch long barrel, an unfolded length of 20.6 inches, and a folded length of 10.6 inches. The weapon weighed four pounds and dispersed 9mm rounds at 650 rounds per minute. 

It’s a very simple blowback-operated SMG. The design isn’t complicated, even though it does admittedly fold in half. 

The Fate of the FMG 

While the weapon was shown to some government officials who expressed interest, they seemingly didn’t express enough interest. The design languished, and Ares only ever produced two prototypes. The Hughes Amendment killed any idea of civilian sales, and the NFA world of SBRs wasn’t nearly as big as it is now, and large format pistols weren’t a thing. The Ares FMG might have been a little too early to succeed. 

“You Cloned Our Pistol… So We Cloned Your Carbine!”

At least that is how I am choosing to believe the conversation went inside Glock HQ as they began producing the Glock GR-115, which is an AR-15. I modernized and well laid out AR-15 with an intriguing optic upon it, to be sure, but an AR-15.

We’ve been hearing rumors of a Glock rifle for years, it appears that someone finally solicited Glock to do their carbine and the result is a very modern AR-15. Ambidextrous lower, LPVO and red dot, suppressor, I believe an adjustable gas system, and all in the modern tan low vis finished that do better both visibly and under alternative spectrum observation devices, thermals and NODS, ended capped with a can.

Glock perfection is apparently Stoner and Sullivan inspired.

I don’t know if this one is a piston or DI design, I am also not particularly bothered knowing until and unless this becomes a contract gun somewhere neat with more details or we get a domestic launch here in the US at SHOT or NRAAM.

I am very intrigued by the scope, the rumor mill around that piece of glass is that it really is something hot in the LPVOsphere and I have been intrigued by challengers to the Razor III’s current top seat every time I hear about them. So of all things I want to know about this carbine, the carbine itself really isn’t the priority compared to whatever is riding in that AUS from Reptilia.

Anyway, Glock confirmed makes an AR now. So we’ve got that going for us. Which is nice.