Advertisement

Federal Government Passes the Buck on Sutherland Springs

Picture via The Business Journals

Federal Government Implicates Academy Sports In Sutherland Springs Mass Shooting

Seen and linked from TPR, an NPR affiliate out of Texas. The Federal Government is placing the civil blame for the Sutherland Springs mass shooting (the one where the former airman convicted of felony domestic violence bought his gun after passing a background check) onto Academy Sports, the Texas retailer.

They are doing so by citing a rule that they made that states that if they screw up it isn’t their fault. No seriously, that’s in the Brady background check bill.

A federal judge in San Antonio has named Academy Sports + Outdoors a co-defendant in a lawsuit stemming from the 2017 Sutherland Springs church shooting, the deadliest in modern Texas history.

Victims and family members from Sutherland Springs sued the government for damages in 2017 after the U.S. Air Force failed to report shooter Devin Kelley’s criminal and psychiatric history to the FBI’s National Instant Background Check System as required by law. Kelley had a history of felony-level domestic violence offenses which should have disqualified him from purchasing weapons. 

The Feds are saying that since Kelley, the shooter, used an ID from a state where high capacity magazines are prohibited the sale was illegal. This makes them a “responsible third party” in the eyes of the Fed.

“Academy sold Kelley a firearm, specifically a high-capacity Model 8500 Ruger AR-556 semi-automatic AR-15 style rifle, which included a large-capacity 30-round magazine. To purchase this firearm, Kelley presented Academy with a Colorado driver’s license. With respect to the sale of that rifle, the Federal Gun Control Act required Academy to comply with the laws of both Texas, the seller’s state, and Colorado, the buyer’s apparent state of residence. Colorado law restricts the sale of high-capacity magazines, i.e. magazines holding more than fifteen rounds. Therefore, Academy was not permitted to sell Kelley the Model 8500 Ruger AR-556 under federal law because sale of that rifle would have been illegal in Colorado. On November 5, 2017, Kelley used the Model 8500 Ruger AR-556 to commit the shooting at the First Baptist Church of Sutherland Springs. Academy’s conduct thus contributed to causing the harm for which recovery is sought in this action.”  

If you are thinking, “Wow, that means every gun dealer has to know every law of their state and every other state when it comes to firearms.” you would be correct. A licensee is not solely responsible for assuring the legality of the sale for their own states rules, but those of the home state on the ID.

To add to that, the Ruger AR isn’t illegal, the magazine it came with was. ID’s are not required under federal law for a magazine. A magazine isn’t federally regulated, only regulated at the state level. They are using the SKU from Ruger, which comes with a 30 round magazine, to posit that the sale was illegal as a whole.

The Feds state that, despite passing the background check, because the Air Force failed to update NICS (which they cannot be held liable for, Brady Bill 1993), it was incumbent on Academy Sports to recognize that the magazine included in this sale, which the FBI cleared, was prohibited in Colorado (not Texas where they were standing) and thus deny the sale to Kelley.

I’m certain Academy wishes they had denied the sale in hindsight. When I interacted with a spree shooter here in Michigan, I and my peers wish the crazy asshole had never come into our store. The fact that he bought a fleece jacket from us turned into a whole tale of us supplying the madman with “protective gear”… yeah, protective from a slightly breezy fall day.

Leave it to .Gov to say, “It’s not our fault. It’s in the rules… that we made, but still.”

Gerald Treece, a professor of constitutional law at South Texas College of Law – Houston, said the government is trying to shift attention and blame.

“It’s a fancy way of saying, ‘We aren’t liable. But if we are, they [Academy Sports] ought to pay for it’” he said.

What is an AR-15?

(from thefirearmblog.com)

In the debate over “assault weapons”, the model designation AR-15 holds a prominent place.  This model is nearl —but not quite—plug-compatible with the US military’s M-16. (The AR-15 does not permit automatic whereas the M-16 can be selectively fired as an automatic.)

Most of the debate revolves around the definition of “assault weapon”.  “Assault weapons” ban legislation is fatally flawed in that they attempt to ban their target based on either:

1) Model number designations, or,

2) Enumerated “evil features” which are for the most part merely cosmetic

An interesting case has come about in which the defendant, Joseph Roh, is charged with illegally manufacturing AR-15s, both complete rifles and lower receivers, without having registered as a Federal Firearms Manufacturer.

A fascinating aspect of this case is how it revolves around the definition of a firearm as it applies to the AR-15.

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco Firearms and Explosives (ATF), the gun industry and gun-owners have developed a de facto consensus on the definition of an AR-15 as a firearm.  If you possess an artifact with certain specific precise dimensions, with a few holes in precise places, then you possess a firearm of type “AR-15”.  If that artifact is not complete, but is any more than “80%” complete, it is still a firearm.  And, thereupon, your possession of that artifact must conform to various Federal laws.

How else could any law work?  If the law purports to regulate some artifact, then the law should describe that artifact with sufficient specificity and clarity that any person with reasonable care can apply the text of the law to an object in hand and recognize whether it is or is-NOT legal.

The consensus notwithstanding, it has been known for some time that the Federal legal definition of a “firearm” doesn’t readily apply to the type labeled “AR-15”.  The definition in the law was drafted pretty reasonably; it’s just that that definition doesn’t fit any particular part of a firearm of this modern sporting variety.

Adam Winkler, the UCLA constitutional law professor and Second Amendment author states that the Joseph Roh case: “. . . could open up a huge loophole in federal law.  It could lead to an explosion in the number of AR-15s out on the streets.”

Winkler’s hyperbole notwithstanding, the problem remains that laws drafted by legislatures are, unavoidably, always incomplete and behind the creativity of inventive gunsmiths.  The actual implication of this case is that  two parallel industries could spring-up, each perfectly legal. Manufacturers in one industry would make one AR-15 component known as the “upper receiver”; while those in the second industry could make another AR-15 component known as the “lower receiver”.

Under current law, neither these upper nor lower receivers would need to be marked with a manufacturer’s identity or a serial number.  Neither would be a “firearm” so long as the two parts were kept apart; i.e., neither in the possession of a single person.  Anyone, man, woman or child, felon or virtuous, could buy one of each—whereupon he would be in possession of a “firearm”.  Yet, that would be his own private affair of no impact on either manufacturer from whom he purchased the parts.

While the ATF, gun industry and gun owners would all regard the second manufacturer (of the “lower receiver”) to be in the business of manufacturing firearms, the ATF could have grave difficulty persuading a judge that such a manufacturer were doing anything unlawful.  Some judges might give great weight to popular consensus (i.e., that the “lower receiver” is the firearm) while other judges could rule in favor of the defendant manufacturer, given the thinking behind the Roh case.  Once any of the dozen Circuit Courts of Appeals rules in favor of such a manufacturer then the jurisdiction of that court could become highly popular for lower receiver manufacturers to set up shop and operate with impunity.

There is no ready solution to the sort of problem raised by this AR-15 definition in the Roh case. The text of a law can’t hope to keep up with ingenuity.  It’s not a reasonable solution to subject every part of a gun (every spring, every screw) to regulation as if it alone were a firearm.  Given current understanding, one would not say that only the assembled collection of parts constitutes a firearm.  Some sort of practical solution will be needed.

The legitimate firearms industry and user community has come to an understanding with the ATF that the lower receiver technically constitutes the firearm. Things run smoothly with this agreed upon rule.  Never ending attempts to legislate the definition, like a cat chasing its tail, could end as a futile attempt to regulate artifacts while ignoring actors.

Yet, this is merely a gentlemen’s agreement rather than a conclusion well fitted to the law. Regulation of firearms—to the extent permitted by the Constitution—depends on the consent of the governed, a goal now under enormous stress by the movement for ever more onerous gun control.  If, as and when that consent is withdrawn, the public will suffer the collateral effects.

.

.

—‘MarkPA’  is trained in economics, a life-long gun owner, NRA Instructor and Massad Ayoob graduate. He is inspired by our inalienable rights to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” and holds that having the means to defend oneself and one’s community is vital to securing them.

All DRGO articles by ‘MarkPA’  

Scalarworks Nightforce Bundles

Great news in my inbox this morning! Scalarworks is offering their LEAP/SCOPE paired with Nightforce optic options. The ATACR and the NX8. The Scalarworks LEAP series of mounts are some of the lightest, strongest, and most innovative systems to come onto the market in the quick detach category.

The LEAP/SCOPE introduced an even more sought after feature with the LevelDrive, a flat top screw that can rapidly level the scope to the mount and drastically cut down on scope mounting time.

You don’t tighten 8-12 screws, check the scope, then loosen 8-12 screws, twist the scope, and retighten hoping it doesn’t shift.

The LEAP/SCOPE only utilize a 4 horizontal screw system, five with the LevelDrive, and these cut mounting time and effort to a fraction of most mounts.

I use the LEAPs, as you can see, and will be adding another to the mix with LEAP/SCOPE. The only questions is which Nightforce? The svelte NX8 that so nicely mirrors the features of the March F? Or the ATACR, one of the special operations premier systems with nearly peerless durability?

Scalarworks pairs are incredibly priced and allow you to save on both the optic and mount, all while the optic is mounted and leveled from the shop.

$1,899.00 with Free Shipping for the NX8, 1.57″ or 1.93″ Heights

$2,899.00 with Free Shipping for the ATACR, 1.57″ or 1.93″

Probably the best method of adding a top tier LPVO to your rifle and if you already have glass just grab the mount.

Five Strange, Weird, and Odd AR 15s

The world of guns can be a weird one. Especially when it comes to popular designs. Since the AR 15 is easily the most popular rifle in the world we have a ton of oddball and strange AR 15s. Odd AR 15s are not exactly self-contained to this era either. We’ve had them coming out as long as we’ve had AR 15s. I’ve picked 5 of my favorite odd AR 15s. This includes some really cool designs, and some are interesting, to say the least. Let’s kick it off with the oldest one on my list.

5. The Colt 608 Survival Rifle

Let’s say you’re a pilot in the 1960s and the last big war had planes being shot down left and right with pilots who survived landing over enemy territory. You probably want something better than a K frame 38 or a 1911. However, space in your plane is cramped what do you do? Well, Colt designed the first Micro AR-style weapon the Colt 608 Survival rifle. As far as odd AR 15s go this one certainly shows it’s age.

Colt fit a very small, fixed metal stock on the end of the buffer tube. They also chose to cut the grip in half for some reason. I guess to reduce weight. They fit a conical muzzle device because as you’d imagine the muzzle blast from a 10-inch barrel is quite bright. Colt’s goal was to sell the weapon as a breakdown rifle, something the AR 15 design naturally already is. It’s super small, and as the Mk 18 showed these rifles could work, but unfortunately, the 608 didn’t go further than a few prototypes.

4. The M231 Port Firing Weapon

This weapon was designed solely for M2 Bradley crews. The M231 was designed to attach to the firing ports of the Bradley and fire if the APC is buttoned up. The weapon apparently serves two purposes. First, when loaded with mags full of tracers it could help direct a gunner’s fire. The secondary goal was a weapon to fight off close-range infantry when the Bradley was buttoned up. The M231 also had a wire style stock so the weapon could be used outside of the Bradley.

Courtesy of Soldier Systems

What’s neat about the M231 is that it’s an open bolt weapon, fully automatic only and the weapon is not fitted with sights. Bradley gunners use a periscope to direct the tracer fire. What’s really cool is the fact the firing rate is a rapid 1,200 rounds per minute. This thing would drain magazines absurdly fast. They are apparently still fielded today or at least were up until the Iraq war where we saw photos of the M231 in action with troops. Some builders have even cloned them with 80 lower receivers and parts kits. Pics Courtesy of Soldier Systems.

3. The Olympic Arms OA-93

The Olympic Arm’s OA-93 is pretty far from a AR 15’s standard design. The OA-93 is a AR 15 pistol and at first glance is one of the least efficient odd AR 15s. Prior to the advent of pistol braces, AR 15 pistols were heavy, clunky, hard to balance and hard to shoot accurately. The OA-93 gets rid of the buffer and buffer tube. Instead, we get the recoil system integrated into a flat-top upper receiver. The full-auto variants used in several movies did have a short buffer tube to accommodate an actual full auto BCG.

Courtesy of Olympic Arms

The OA-93 was most famously used by Willem Dafoe in Clear and Present Danger by badass Black Ops Commando John Clark. The weapon itself was an interesting development and the gun’s unique appearance and design have allowed it to make its way into several films. However, the gun never saw mass popularity mostly due to the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban. According to Olympic Arm’s website, the gun is still produced and for sale.

Courtesy IMFDB

2. The Ares Shrike / FightLite MCR

The Ares Shrike is a belt-fed variant of the AR 15 intended to be an automatic rifle or light machine gun. This isn’t the first time someone has tried this. Colt saw limited success with their automatic rifle. However, the Shrike makes the list for a few reasons. I think it’s a better design, and I can own one. Ares has become Fightlite and Fightlite still produces Shrike upper receivers and rifles under the MCR name.

Courtesy of FightLite

The Shrike or MCR uses it’s own proprietary upper that is a gas piston design. The upper receiver mates perfectly with a standard AR 15 lower. The Shrike has a quick change barrel, the option for a closed or open bolt, and a dual feed version that allows you to use a magazine or belt-fed design. As far as odd AR 15s go this is my personal favorite. Call it a machine gunner mentality but everything is made better when it’s belt-fed.

1 The FoldAr

Good Puns will always get points when I choose lists of guns. The FoldAr is both a great pun and a really cool design. As far as odd AR 15s go this may be the oddest. It folds, not just the stock, but the barrel too. Well, technically the double FoldAr will fold at the barrel and stock/brace area. The Standard FoldAr allows you to fold the barrel against the receiver to cut the effective length in half.

Courtesy of FoldAR

The FoldAr series use a proprietary upper with the FoldAr system that allows the barrel to safely fold and unfold over and over again while properly indexing. The Double FoldAr uses the Dead Foot Arms folding stock/brace system to make a completely folded up AR 15. This reduces the size of the gun drastically and makes it easy to store in nothing more than a backpack. Plus, like the Shrike/MCR upper it’s available to civilians.

Courtesy FoldAR

Odd Ar 15s Rule

I like weird stuff, and it is truly fascinating how modular the AR 15 platform is. Look at what some enterprising and engineering minds can do to the platform. These are only a few Odd AR 15s and if popular demand allows I’ll dig into a few more. Odd AR 15s are more common than you’d think, but these are my five favorites.

Drivers With DUIs Shouldn’t Be Armed – Bloomberg

Image via History.com

Alcohol abuse and gun violence have a well-documented connection. The opening of this genius diatribe states… DUI recipients are all EVIL and can’t be trusted with a gun, it alleges.

This wonderful piece is over at Bloomberg.com. I shouldn’t have held any expectations for their piece. I didn’t have any expectations for their piece, and yet I was still disappointed in the vague quasi-factoid laden work they published this morning. So let’s look at why ‘Drivers With DUIs Shouldn’t Be Armed’.

The combination of guns and alcohol is especially dangerous, and far too little has been done to address it. Federal law doesn’t restrict access to guns by people with a history of alcohol abuse, and fewer than half of U.S. states impose prohibitions of this kind. The risks to public safety are increasingly clear, and the issue demands more careful attention than lawmakers have allowed up to now.

Okay… like what? What is the glaring “loophole” in current law that allows persons with a history of violence or a felony conviction for intoxicated operation to own a firearm. Because the last I checked, literally just a moment ago since it’s also a federal requirement for me, any felony conviction still disqualifies someone from owning a firearm legally. This includes every alcohol or substance related felony. Also, any misdemeanor conviction for domestic violence disqualifies you per federal law.

There’s a close parallel. Over a span of years, evidence accumulated to show that domestic abusers are significantly more likely to kill somebody using a gun. The data showed that millions of American women have been threatened with a gun or shot by a domestic partner. Gradually a consensus formed to support denying firearms to convicted abusers. Federal and state laws were adopted to that end. [emphasis added]

Oh look! I just said that. Now where does alcohol fall into this? Does a domestic abuser who has an alcohol related conviction magically get their rights back? No? Okay, then.

To be sure, they’re less effective than one would wish…

Hold up. That could be said of the influence of every law ever passed.

The U.S. Senate’s failure to enact comprehensive background checks makes it much too easy for prohibited people to get a gun. On average, from 2006 to 2014, at least 760 Americans were shot dead each year by a spouse, former spouse or dating partner. Even so, federal and state laws designed to keep guns away from abusers make a difference.

So what are you saying here? The laws don’t work or they do? And what part of ‘Universal Background Check’ laws, as written, do you believe will have a significant impact on domestic abusers getting firearms they shouldn’t have? Background checks work from licensed dealers. There is no enforcement mechanism on the planet that will work for the general population.

Today, the links between alcohol abuse and firearm violence are also well established. “The research consistently shows that alcohol abuse is associated with violence toward self and others,” stated a comprehensive 2013 report by a consortium of leading researchers.

I notice firearm violence isn’t the quote, just general violence.

Millions of firearm owners are binge drinkers

Harsh. Millions in general are binge drinkers. Millions speed. Millions use the Marijuana. Only a history of violence is actually… a history of violence.

— and among American men, deaths from alcohol-related firearm violence are on par with those from alcohol-related motor-vehicle accidents, according to a 2015 study.

Since they roll suicides and accidents into firearm violence that isn’t surprising. Especially suicide, the number one source of firearms deaths in the nation. It’s so convenient they roll that number into ‘gun violence’ isn’t it? Obfuscation to support the narrative.

Now, none of my criticism here is to belittle the fact that alcohol is abused by far too many. That it leads to accidents, bad decisions, chemically removes inhibitions, etc. My criticism is this that this loose and round about methodology is being used as a justification to curtail the natural born rights of someone, regardless of a history of violence. The history of violence is already a disqualifying factor and alcohol’s involvement is irrelevant beyond the data point as a contributing factor to chemically altered judgement.

Last month, a new study confirmed a link between firearm violence and convictions for driving under the influence of alcohol. It tracked 78,878 handgun purchasers over 13 years. Purchasers with DUI convictions were more than four times as likely to be arrested for murder, rape, robbery or aggravated assault than those without.

So… it tracked them over 13 years. And 9% of those with a DUI conviction who purchased were later arrested for a violent crime. Compared to 91% who were not. Those 91% of people with a DUI who would also lose their self defense rights but not be convicted of violence.

“Of the 78,878 handgun purchasers in California whose criminal records we tracked during 13 years, 9% of purchasers with pre-existing DUI convictions were later arrested for murder, rape, robbery or aggravated assault. This is compared to 2% of purchasers with no prior criminal history at the time of purchase,”

So, we can conclude that a conviction for alcohol correlates to a higher likelihood of making other poor decisions, like committing an act of violence. We can conclude that the rate (all from data from California) is 9:2 over the non-DUI population who could also purchase a handgun.

But what is completely ignored is that the ratio of persons who commit further violence is only 1:10 but the disqualifier would be applied to everyone. Only 9% of persons convicted of a DUI and who owned a handgun would become a problem, but let’s strip the right from 100% of them. That is the argument.

The argument is shit.

CROSSBREED RECKONING HELLCAT HOLSTER

The Reckoning from Crossbreed offers Hellcat owners a remarkably adaptable holster for the capable little pistol.

You might recognize the holster you are seeing here as the same one that is part of the current “Hellcat Giveaway” featured on The Armory Life. I thought it might be a good idea to take a closer look at the holster and see why it was selected to be paired with the giveaway package.

A Hybrid for a Hybrid?

For those not familiar with Crossbreed, this is a company that’s all about combining disparate elements and features into new and innovative designs. It’s right there in the name “Crossbreed,” right? In fact, a Crossbreed holster like the Reckoning is a fitting partner for a pistol like the Hellcat, which in itself is a sort of “best of both worlds” design.

My take on the Hellcat from the beginning has been that, from its impressive accuracy potential to its ability to accept optics to its excellent U-Dot sights, it’s a pistol that combines the shooting characteristics and features of a full-size handgun with ultra-compact dimensions. So why shouldn’t it be paired with an equally adaptable hybrid-style holster?

What’s to It?

The Reckoning holster is made up of a top grain leather backer combined with a Kydex “pocket” that holds the pistol. The result is a holster that offers the comfort of leather against the body and the benefits of modern Kydex around the gun. The leather is offered in black cowhide, premium horsehide or Founder’s Series, the latter of which is 100% vegetable tanned leather. You can also get it in right- and left-hand versions.

Sig Sauer Silver Bullets?

Okay no, no vampire or werewolf increased effectiveness here, despite being in spooky season. No, these silver sheened rounds from Sig Sauer’s ammunition line up are for a different series of predators, both two and four legged. The ‘silver bullet’s’ are Sig’s Elite Copper Hunting HT’s and might be just the round you are looking for.

223REM, 60GR, ELITE HUNTING HT

Sig Sauer 60gr Elite Hunting HT Elite Copper Hunting use a solid copper bonded bullet for uniform expansion, 1.8x diameter
…shiny

Many of you may recall how my Sig Sauer 77gr review went. If not, go ahead and click that link. But in short I started the evaluation earlier than intended because I grabbed my loaded 77gr magazine while shooting from the bench rapidly and shot the high performing and far more expensive OTM ammo down range behind some bulk bought M193.

There is little visual difference between the OTM and 55gr practice rounds I was shooting and down range they went. Oops. Live and learn, and look at some visually distinct ammo. Enter 60gr HT.

The HT Anatomy

The Elite Copper Hunting line are made around an all copper projectile. No lead, this has become a requirement in several jurisdictions to use the ammo for hunting, if at all. On top of being a “green” round by having a non-lead bullet the copper itself is bonded in such a way to maximize its expansion in soft tissue and leave effective permanent wound cavities. This combined with the high speed of the 5.56/.223 Remington rounds makes for an incredible terminal package.

The projectile is seated in a nickel plated case. The “silver bullets” are copper seated in nickel. That nickel case gives the ammunition a greater environmental seal. It resists moisture incursion and exposure degradation better than brass alone. Important when outside, when stored in sub-optimal conditions, and when carried on or near your person.

You sweat. I sweat. It gets gross. Clean your EDC and you’ll understand. That harsh external environment is leading reason a lot of EDC hollow point ammunition uses nickel casings. The same logic applies to these rounds.

Visually Distinct

The nickel casings have a secondary benefit that you and I can utilize to keep your defense and performance ammo seperated from your practice ammo. The rounds are strikingly visually distinct from regular brass case 5.56/.223 and, just like your magazine of hollow points for your carry gun, making it an easy at a glance check.

Why Solid Copper?

Lead free projectiles have become mandatory for hunting in several locations around the nation, this satisfies that requirement.

But, from a performance standpoint, let us turn to a recent military ammunition development that was being run parallel to M855A1. The Special Operations Science and Technology or SOST, the Marine Corps’ own silver bullet.

The History of SOST

Following early engagements in Afghanistan and Iraq, U.S. Special Operations Forces reported that M855 ammunition used in M4A1 rifles was ineffective. In 2005, the Pentagon issued a formal request to the ammunition industry for “enhanced” ammunition. The only business that responded was the Federal Cartridge Company, owned by Alliant Techsystems. Working with the Naval Surface Warfare Center Crane Division, the team created performance objectives for the new ammo: increased consistency from shot to shot regardless of temperature changes, accuracy out of an M4A1 better than 2 minute of angle (1 inches at 100 yards, 3.9 inches at 300 yards), increased stopping power after passing through “intermediate barriers” like walls and car windshields, increased performance and decreased muzzle flash out of shorter barrel FN SCAR rifles, and costs close to the M855. The first prototypes were delivered to the government in August 2007. Increased velocity and decreased muzzle flash were accomplished by the type of powder used. The design of the bullet was called the Open Tip Match Rear Penetrator (OTMRP). The front of it is an open tip backed up by a lead core, while the rear half is solid brass. When the bullet hits a hard barrier, the front half of the bullet crushes against the barrier, breaking it so the penetrating half of the bullet can go through and hit the target. With the lead section penetrating the target and the brass section following, it was referred to as a “barrier blind” bullet.[48][120]

Officially designated the Mk318 Mod 0 “Cartridge, Caliber 5.56mm Ball, Carbine, Barrier”, and called SOST (Special Operations Science and Technology) ammunition, the 62-grain bullet fragments consistently, even out of a 10.5 in barrel. The lead portion fragments in the first few inches of soft tissue, then the solid copper rear penetrates 18 in of tissue (shown though ballistic gelatin) while tumbling. Out of a 14″ in barrel, the Mk318 has a muzzle velocity of 2,925 ft/s (892 m/s).[48][120]

In February 2010, the U.S. Marine Corps adopted the Mk318 for use by infantry. To be fielded by an entire branch of the military, the round is classified as having an “open-tip” bullet, similar to the M118LR 7.62 NATO round. The SOST bullet uses a “reverse drawn” forming process. The base of the bullet is made first, the lead core is placed on top of it, and then the jacketing is pulled up around the lead core from bottom to tip. Conventional, and cheaper, bullets are made with the method of the jacket drawn from the nose to an exposed lead base. The reverse drawn technique leaves an open tip as a byproduct of the manufacturing process, and is not specifically designed for expansion or to affect terminal ballistics. The Pentagon legally cleared the rounds for Marine use in late January. The Marines fielded the Mk318 gradually and in small numbers. Initial studies showed that insurgents hit by it suffered larger exit wounds, although information was limited. SOST rounds were used alongside M855 rounds in situations where the SOST would be more effective.[48][120][121] In July 2010, the Marines purchased 1.8 million M855A1 Enhanced Performance Rounds, in addition to millions of Mk318 rounds in service, as part of its effort to replace its M855 ammo.[122] As of May 2015, Marine combat units still deployed with a mixture of both SOST and M855 rounds.[123]

As the issue of environmentally friendly ammo grew, the Marines looked to see if the Mk318’s lead could be replaced while still meeting specifications. They found that by replacing the lead with copper and slightly stretching the jacket around to crimp the nose even more, the bullet’s ballistic coefficient increased. To avoid visual confusion with the Mk 262 round, the bullet was entirely nickel-plated for a silver color; the enhanced silver-colored copper jacketed, open tip match, 62-grain projectile was named the Mk318 Mod 1.[124]

If you are drawing parallels, you should be.

The principle difference between the 62gr Mk318 Mod 1 and the 60gr ECH HT are in the way the copper is bonded to expand or fragment. The Sig round is designed to crush into a larger wound channel causing mass where the Mk318 Mod 1 will fragment for the same desired interior effect.

Greater internal tissue damage to generate exsanguination, greater transfer of energy at high velocity for hydrostatic shock generation, and higher ballistic coefficients for improved accuracy and consistency. So for the field, or the homestead, Sigs a solid commercial variant of the solid copper solution.

Vaultek LifePod – Lock it Down

There are numerous differences in what one considers a safe. What we are looking at today isn’t quite a safe, but can act like one in many ways. Vaultek calls it lockable storage and that’s a bit more accurate. The LifePod by Vaultek is a small lockbox that incorporates both manual and electronic locks. It’s not designed for one particular use, but it does seem to make an excellent gun box for transport, temporary storage, or for a vehicle.

The LifePod could secure anything you wished, but as a gun writer its not hard to guess what I’m going to lock up. Others may choose to lock up cash, valuable jewelry, important documents or electronics. The box will certainly fill those roles as well. The LifePod is small and very lightweight. It would easily fit in a backpack, a sling bag, or in the center console of most vehicles.

It comes with compression latches as well as a locking system. It’s also water-resistant and could seemingly act an awesome tool to product valuable gear from breaking on hikes, humps, or any other adventures you go on.

As a Gun Safe?

Safe is too strong of a word. This wouldn’t be a box I’d leave my gun in for an extended period of time. However, if I was traveling this is going to be a must-have. It comes with a tether that allows you to tie it down as well. I could see a lot of value in the LifePod when it comes to having to leave a gun in a vehicle. I don’t mean a truck gun or long term storage.

This is perfect if you get to an area where it’s illegal to carry a gun. Say I go to a government building where carry is prohibited. The LifePod is adequate enough for a short period of time where I can’t carry. A thief would have to move fast to open my trunk and get the LifePod cut off its tether.

Another good job for the LifePod would be a nightstand safe. It’s quick to open and would prevent kids from grabbing your gun while you sleep. I wouldn’t leave the LifePod unsecured with a firearm for long, but it fills a gap as a lockable storage device.

The LifePod is dust, water, and airtight. It even floats.

How Does the LifePod Work?

The safe is electronic with a 4 digit key code option as well as a manual lock and key option. Interestingly enough inside the box is a way to turn off the manual lock to prevent picking. This would be a must for me when it comes to flying with guns.

The LifePod allows you to program a four-digit code for quick and easy opening. It runs off of a 9-volt battery that can last for up to a year. Additionally, there is a port for a Micro USB adapter should the batteries die and you find yourself without a key.

Inside the LifePod comes with three layers of soft material that can be shaped to your specific firearm or item. The LifePod is just large enough to hold one full-sized automatic handgun.

Programming the four-digit locking code is simple and the unit is very responsive to touch. When you enter the wrong code a red LED lights up with a negative tone, the right code gets you a green LED and the sound of an unlocking safe.

I’ve put in the code hundreds of times, just sitting on my desk, over and over again to see if I could induce failure. I can happily say the lock unlocks and locks without issue regardless of how many times I punch in my four-digit code.

You undo the compression latches and now you have access to your LifePod. To lock the safe press on the lock button for two seconds. You’ll hear the lock engage and you are golden.

The LifePod

The LifePod feels extremely well made and looks slick and modern. It comes in a wide variety of different colors and is lightweight and compact. It certainly has its limitations. As you’d imagine someone could break the LifePod open with a little time and some basic hand tools. The LifepPod isn’t made for long term storage but acts as a modern lockbox that ensures your valuables are well protected when a safe isn’t accessible.

Avoiding Counterfeits – Don’t Get Fooled

I don’t think there is a thing in the world that China doesn’t copy. They mass-produce a wide variety of counterfeit items and mark them with real brand names. The gun world is not immune to counterfeits. Sure, we don’t necessarily see counterfeit guns, but gun parts and accessories are copied, counterfeited, and produced by the tons.

Looks Legit

The vast majority of these products come from China. In fact, according to this NPR article in August 2019, CBP and the ATF stopped shipments totaling 53,000 counterfeits. These including stocks, sights, and other gun parts. It’s a major issue and one that any potential gun owner should be aware of.

Today we are going to address how to avoid counterfeits and how to tell if an item is a counterfeit gun part.

Counterfeits Vs Licensed Reproductions

Before we talk about counterfeit items we need to address that there is a difference between a counterfeit item and a licensed reproduction. There is a huge demand for gun parts for the sport of airsoft.

This is a real MBUS Pro, but it is widely counterfeited.

People want their airsoft guns to look and feel like the real thing. In fact, airsoft and similar sports seem to drive the counterfeiting market more than any other specific factor. This is why the most common counterfeit items are high dollar tactical gear.

This doesn’t mean there are no legitimate companies working within the letter of the law to fill this airsoft demand. A number of companies are producing, or licensing their designs, to airsoft companies. These reproductions are designed for airsoft and marketed as such. The biggest company doing this is Magpul with its “PTS” line of products.

Unfortunately, these reproductions are few and far between.

How To Tell if it’s a Counterfeit?

Interestingly enough this answer will vary depending on each item. The biggest way to tell when a product is a counterfeit is to consider who is selling it. Wish and Aliexpress are well known for marketing and selling counterfeits and they don’t sell anything beyond counterfeit goods. With Wish or Aliexpress you are also buying them at super low prices. No one is really being tricked by these two websites.

No, what happens is jerks buy these counterfeits and then attempt to pass them off as the real thing. This is where websites like eBay and even local buy, sell, and trade forums are full of this crap.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is screenshot-www.ebay_.com-2019.10.14-13_13_29.png

eBay is seller to seller and full of people trying to pass off low-end junk for high-end parts. This isn’t just scopes, stocks, and sights, but parts as small as charging handles are counterfeited. China was even importing 80 lower Receivers according to a 2013 Article from the Firearms Blog.

Amazon is a little better, but the problem still persists with many reviews pointing out that their item is a fake. Some of these fakes are done extremely well in terms of color, controls, markings, and other small details.

Down and Dirty With Fakes

This is a fake Steiner Dbal D2. It looks good, it’s hefty and has real weight. The QD attachment is well done. The logos are visible too. However, once you start looking at the finer details it becomes apparent that this is a well-made fraud.

This is the Real Thing

First, the controls to adjust the laser are all backward. Second, the pressure pad uses the wrong connector, Those are two apparent differences you can spot with the naked eye. Oh, and it lacks a serial number.

This is the fake… Notice the Up and Down Adjustments are reversed

I only know this because I poured over real pics of Dbals and began picking out the inconsistencies. I was given this fake for free so I wasn’t scammed. It just got my wheels turning at how well these are made.

The best thing you can do is know the item you are buying inside and out. If possible ask questions, like where did you buy, and when? It’s typically easy to verify if the product was sold at that retailer or if it was even being produced at that time.

If possible get the serial number and call the actual company for verification. Most high-end optics companies like Steiner, Trijicon, and Aimpoint serialize their items.

PEQ 15s DO NOT HAVE WHITE LIGHTS

Optics and accessory companies are hesitant to give a lot of pointers on what to look for in fear of having the counterfeits being copied even more. However, Trijicon, Eotech, and Aimpoint all have pages dedicated to helping spot fakes.

The best advice I can give is to use common sense. If it’s a deal too good to be true then it likely is. People don’t sell Acogs for 120 bucks, and PEQ 15s don’t have white lights. Buy from trusted retailers and understand the deal of a life time rarely is.

UNDERSTANDING THE HELLCAT U-DOT

The Optical Sight Pistol (OSP) version of the Hellcat accepts red dots like the excellent Shield RMSc. But let’s not forget those iron sights backing it up…

Let’s be frank. There are so many cool things about Springfield Armory’s new 9mm Hellcat, it’s hard to decide where to focus. From its 11+1 capacity in a stunningly compact gun to its excellent grip texture to its streamlined design, there’s a lot to talk about here.

But if there’s one thing that seems to have really caught everyone’s attention, it’s the pistol’s ability to accept micro-sized red dots on the OSP (Optical Sight Pistol) version. There’s no getting around the fact that being able to cram a little red dot like the Shield RMSc onto a gun this size is remarkable.

But what about those sights backing up that red dot, featured on both the OSP and standard versions of the Hellcat? In my opinion, these “U-Dot” sights are one of the coolest features of the new pistol.

Setting Your Sights

To be honest, I’ve only recently started getting into customizing my CCW guns. For years, I would stick with “stock” guns only. However, over the past few years I’ve started adding/changing things here and there, and slowly warmed up to more thoroughly customizing my guns. And one of the first things I would change out was the sights.

What I wanted was a good tritium front sight, preferably with a high-visibility ring (in a bright color) around the night sight dot. This would give me a sighting system that would offer high visibility in the bright sun, as well as night sighting in low-light. I’ll tell you from personal experience that getting a good set of sights like this is going to set you back something in the range of at least $100 — and more like $150 or more.

U-Dot bright front sight on the Hellcat
The front sight of the U-Dot system features a tritium dot surrounded by a large and highly visible green luminescent ring.

Which brings us to the Hellcat’s U-Dot sights. These things are exceptional, and rival many of the aftermarket sights I’ve used over the years. Factoring in the $569 MSRP of the standard Hellcat (and $599 for the OSP version), these sights alone in my opinion make the gun a smart buy.

SIG SAUER ProForce M17 Airsoft Pistol Now Shipping

NEWINGTON, N.H., (October 16, 2019) – SIG SAUER, Inc. is now shipping the semi-automatic SIG AIR ProForce M17 airsoft pistol.
 
Designed for professional training, this high-end SIG AIR ProForce airsoft pistol is a replica of the U.S. Army issued P320-M17 9mm pistol in look, balance, and handling characteristics and engineered to SIG standards for precision, accuracy, and reliability.

The ProForce M17 features a polymer frame and metal slide with full blow-back action. The proprietary drop magazine holds 21 rounds of 6mm polymer or biodegradable BBs.  An adjustable “hop-up” feature creates spin on the BBs for additional stabilization in flight, resulting in increased distance and accuracy.  A picatinny accessory rail allows for quick and easy accessory mounting, comes with an optic cut for the addition of the soon-to-be-released SIG AIR Red Dot Optic, and is available in 12g CO2 cartridge or green gas power options.

ProForce M17 Airsoft Pistol:

Total length: 8.5”
Barrel length:  5.5”
Weight:  2.6 lbs.
Finish:  Coyote Tan
Muzzle Velocity using .20g Polymer BBs: Up to 410 fps (CO2), up to 320 fps (Green Gas)
Muzzle Energy: 1.5 joules (CO2), 1 joule (Green Gas)
Caliber:  6mm BB
Magazine Capacity:  21
Power Source:  CO2 or Green Gas

MSRP: $179.99

The ProForce M17 is available for purchase at the sigsauer.com/store.

For more information on SIG SAUER airguns, visit sigsauer.com/airguns.

About SIG SAUER, Inc.

SIG SAUER, Inc. is  a leading provider and manufacturer of firearms, electro-optics, ammunition, airguns, suppressors, and training. For over 150 years SIG SAUER, Inc. has evolved, and thrived, by blending American ingenuity, German engineering, and Swiss precision. Today, SIG SAUER is synonymous with industry-leading quality and innovation which has made it the brand of choice amongst the U.S. Military, the global defense community, law enforcement, competitive shooters, hunters, and responsible citizens. Additionally, SIG SAUER is the premier provider of elite firearms instruction and tactical training at the SIG SAUER Academy. Headquartered in Newington, New Hampshire, SIG SAUER has almost 2,000 employees across eight locations. For more information about the company and product line visit: sigsauer.com.

The NGSW Three

For those following the Next Generation Squad Weapon contract competition being run by the US Army, all three finalist submissions have been made public.

The crux of the competition is an update to the individual service weapons of the US Military’s fireteam elements, specifically the Army. The Marine Corps is closely following the development as well but has their own requirements to remain directly involved as a purchasing entity. The Marines have charted their own course in recent years by adopting the service exclusive M27 as an updated service rifle while the Army stuck it out with the M4A1.

Both weapons are behind the technological times however.

The NGSW is for two weapons in a new unspecified 6.8mm round that should vastly outperform current 5.56 and 7.62 rounds for effective range, accuracy, and wounding characteristics. One rifle and one automatic rifle will be selected. The weapons will also be forward thinking compatible with future optics and power systems in development.

The 6.8mm was selected as part of the ‘overmatch’ theory in that we would have a standard small arm that could out range and out damage round per round any of its peers. Greater effective range and greater effect on modern equipped near peer infantry are the end goals. The 6.8mm should, in theory, still retain a very manageable recoil (think along the lines of 6.5 Creedmoor) while being ballistically superior to 7.62x51mm legacy systems.

The finalists are…

Sig Sauer (Their MCX derivative and belt fed automatic rifle are the title image)

General Dynamics OT&S, with partners True Velocity & Beretta

Automatic Rifle
Carbine

And Textron Systems partnered with Winchester and H&K

All Images VIA Soldier Systems

Here’s my take on the systems.

Textron

The Textron, H&K, and Winchester collaboration appear to be fairly straightforward designs spinning off of Textron’s telescoped ammunition concept. Controls are AR like, appear ambidextrous, and feature largely familiar layouts for both rifle and automatic rifle. There is a lot going on with the handguard area, I suspect for near future battery storage to power optics, laser, and ancillary equipment.

It does look the most awkward to use out of the three. It reminds me of trying to hold the M203 equipped M16, that bulky beast, but without the benefit of a grenade launcher.

Winchester did win the contract to run Lake City, which seems to indicate they will be making their ammo. This could be any ammo however, if one of the other competitors won Winchester would make that ammunition design. Or any design the DoD decides for that matter.

General Dynamics OT&S, with partners True Velocity & Beretta

The most interesting of the three submissions is the General Dynamics. They’re going bullpup. And they have video.

From True Velocity’s Instagram

It’s quite an action series. Long barrels on short guns is still the defining advantage of bullpup rifles. I do like me a bullpup every now and then, the X95 and Tavor 7 being prime examples. They’re utilizing the True Velocity polymer cased 6.8mm rounds and feature a very squat sound suppressor.

The selector on these are a rotary design located above the trigger guard, not dissimilar in function from an SA80. It’s curious they appear to be splitting the safe and fire from the semi-auto and automatic functions. The design even looks a little reminiscent of the Barrett bullpup .50’s.

This would be the greatest departure from current small arms design and doctrine in the US forces of the three submissions. I don’t know how well the bullpup automatic rifle is going to function from a volume of fire standpoint either. The Marines are currently requiring a magazine fed design, consistent with the M27 in that regard, to consider the system for adoption.

Both the AUG and SA80/L86 that were used as bullpup support weapons were largely supplanted by more effective belt feds. It will be interesting to see and hear the Army’s take on the system.

Sig Sauer

Sig, who has been eating up contracts since the M17/M18 win, honestly looks to have the best looking submission.

Unlike the other competitors who partnered Sig has been doing it all themselves. Suppressor? Theirs. Ammunition? Theirs. Optics? Theirs, with two fresh wins on the SDMR M110A1 and the SOCOM 1-6x to run with. There are open optic solicitations too and a slew of legacy systems but they are all compatible.

The ammunition is the most conventional of the three 6.8mm rounds submitted, being a metallic cartridge. It’s a brass/steel hybrid. The rifle layouts themselves are highly ergonomically consistent with modern designs. The carbine and automatic rifle have AR style selectors and the carbine features full ambidextrous controls, plus a forward side charger charging handle to supplement the traditional AR location.

Gratuitous M-LOK and hard point QD’s for slings abound. The stocks fold and are adjustable for length of pull, M4 derivatives of some variety.

The automatic rifle is reported to have a sidegate feed system for the belt and, I believe, can be magazine fed as well.

Final thoughts

Given similar reliability and performance numbers from the three weapons systems, I would select Sig’s submission without hesitation. While I think True Velocity has something going with their polymer cased ammunition I don’t like the ergonomics on their systems at a glance the way I do Sig’s. The same goes for Textron, in their case its the bulk of the system.

Sig’s, again at a glance, appear to incorporate the majority of modern rifle features into the system without additional bulk. They compliment the AR ergonomics and would require a much lower training/retraining curve to implement the system than the General Dynamics bullpup. While the Textron appears closer the departure still appears to be greater than the Sig submission.

Going to a new round will be the most significant departure from conventional small arms theory in decades. Going to the telescoping ammo or polymer casings, if reliable, could significantly cut shift weight distribution in favor of carrying more rounds. I don’t have weight specs on any of the individual components though at this juncture.

If Sig wins though, they’d have a hell of a hold on the US small arms community, something they absolutely want.

Registration Leads Towards…

NZ PM Jacinda Ardern, image via Newsweek

Checking back in with our southern hemispheric friends in New Zealand they have more gun control on the way.

Comprehensive gun register part of next stage of firearms law reform post Christchurch shootings

Seven months after the Christchurch shooting the second tranche of this gun control reform process is underway. The new law emphasises that the possession and use of firearms is a privilege (as opposed to a legal right), and aims to ensure that people in lawful possession of their firearms act responsibly in the interests of personal and public safety.

To supposedly achieve these goals the proposed law will seek improvements in the licensing of shooting clubs. It will also refine who is “fit and proper”, with prima facie restrictions on, among others, gang members and people who show patterns of behavior that exhibit or promote violence, hatred or extremism.

Okay, so far standard, but without a lot of detail in who gets to be a ‘gang member’. Is that covered by being convicted of participation in organized crime? Or can you just get tagged as a gang member for allegedly running with a gang by being seen around them in some manner? No trial or conviction, just an alleged association?

This is the third time in recent history New Zealand has attempted to reintroduce a firearms register. If it is approved this time, it will give authorities better information to trace hundreds of thousands of legally owned weapons, solves crime and slow the flow of firearms to criminals.

Will it though? States and nations with firearm registries tend to abandon them as prohibitively costly and underwhelmingly effective. The 237,000 gun owners are already on registry. Why the individual guns too? Criminal elements will never report their weapons, their ownership, or their illicit actions to the authority so what data is this giving New Zealand beyond a streamlined method for removing lawful (for now) arms from the general population.

New Zealand’s homicide rate was, until Christchurch, at a 40-year low (35 murders in 2017). Of these deaths, only one in ten involved the use of firearms. Stabbing or cutting weapons were responsible for a quarter of all homicides.

That sound familiar? Like the ratio of stabbing and cutting implements compared to rifle use in homicides domestically? Yet the reaction in NZ was to sweep aside all the lawful owners, who are shown by that very number not to be a problem, and just hope that the next terrorist follows the rules and doesn’t acquire a gun or explosives…

Great plan, Prime Minister. Stellar.

Previously lawful military style semi-automatics are less common in homicides, they made up only 7% of the total. Compared to shotguns (still legal) which are 33%. This all sounds like the gun control wet dream of systematically banning them all. If we had to take care of the guns that were only 7% of all murders, surely we have to take out the guns accounting for far greater ratios.

Between March 2018 and 2019, there were 3,043 instances where police recorded an offence that involved the use of a firearm unlawfully. More specific evidence suggests 97 instances in the decade from 2008 to 2018 where firearms were used, or threatened, against law enforcement officers.

Most firearms crimes are committed by people who are not licensed to be in possession of a gun. A minority of these crimes are committed by people licensed to possess firearms. All evidence points to the lawful owners being exactly that, lawful, and yet every new restriction targets them most drastically in an effort to influence by proxy through the tool, the gun, those who would do harm anyway.

What are the metrics that define these measures as successful? In what meaningful way can restricting lawful access to arms influence the unlawful use of arms?

New Ruger PC Carbine Chassis Model – M-LOK, Adjustable Stock, and AR Grip.

The new PC Carbine’s glass-filled polymer chassis system, with integrated rear 7075-T6 aluminum Picatinny rail, allows for standard AR grips and rail-mountable stocks or extensions. (Photo: Ruger)

A new Chassis Model version of their 9mm pistol caliber PC Carbine that allows the use of standard AR pistol grips and collapsible buttstocks has now hit the market.

Sporting M-LOK, a threaded barrel, QD sling sockets, a 6-position MOE stock, and Ruger’s AR grip (quite comfy) the formly conventional layout of the PCC has received quite an update.

The Chassis Model comes standard with the much appreciated interchangeable magazine well system to accept common Ruger and Glock magazines, and a reversible magazine release and charging handle to accommodate right- or left-handed shooters.

Overall length is 32.25 and 35.5-inches with the adjustable MOE stock. The incredibly simple disassembly system is still in place too. Disassemble and reassemble with a twist.

The model's CNC-milled handguard is Type III hard-coat anodized aluminum with Magpul M-LOK accessory attachment slots on all four sides. (Photo: Ruger)

The model’s CNC-milled handguard is Type III hard-coat anodized aluminum with Magpul M-LOK accessory attachment slots on all four sides. (Photo: Ruger)

The new PC is available in a pair of 10-round state compliant models for those behind the lines– one with an adjustable stock and threaded barrel, and the other with a fixed stock and non-threaded barrel. Even the restricted states can enjoy the newest iteration.

MSRP is $799.

The Pistol Caliber Carbine has been an explosive item for the last several years. They’re fun to shoot, effective home defense tools, many are highly portable for hiking/survival, and the ammo is inexpensive and available. The adaptable PCC Ruger has developed hits an incredible number of these requirements and desirable feature sets out of the park. All while looking something out of 80s/90s Sci-Fi.

Neat!

CNN Uncovers Why Gun Control is a Sham

Image via CNN Joseph Roh in the factory where he manufactured and sold AR-15-style weapons before being raided by agents from the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives five years ago.

To legislate something effectively, you must first define it.

CNN has published a story. It’s an illustrative story. It reveals much about the actual true state of law and firearms in this nation, and by extension around the world. We tend to live in this bubble within ‘Rule of Law’ and when the laws we are most aware of make sense, speed limits for example, we begin to naturally assume all laws make around that much sense too. Even if we know better.

He sold illegal AR-15s. Feds agreed to let him go free to avoid hurting gun control efforts

So.

Here’s what happened, you can read the whole fasicating thing on CNN’s page but for those who would rather a summary, here we go.

Joseph Roh illegally manufactured AR-15-style rifles in a warehouse south of Los Angeles. No serial number 80% type deals.

More than two dozen of his customers were legally prohibited from possessing a firearm. But they could push a button, pull a lever, and walk away a short time later with a fully assembled, untraceable semi-automatic weapon for about $1,000.

By “technically” building their own firearm the buyers were never subject to a 4473 NICS transfer and thus no background check. They were still breaking the law, as they were prohibited persons, but there was no notice to any LEO agency because the only point where it became a functioning firearm and subject to the controls inherent on manufactured firearms, it was in the owner’s possession.

Firearms built for personal use are not required to be serialized. They cannot be sold legally until they are serialized. Roh was playing fast and loose with this legal provision and got rolled up for it. Facing federal charges as an illicit arms dealer Roh hit the courtroom.

And now… the charges are being dropped on a deferred prosecution agreement. Basically if Roh keeps his nose clean for X amount of time he’s free and clear of the full list of charges that were circumventing the background checks and manufacturing laws.

Why?

It’s all in the definitions.

Because the AR-15 (and several other modern rifle designs) use a two receiver system to distribute the held operational parts, they are not functional firearms. When seperated from any functioning parts they are not firearms.

Duh, but we’ve always done it this way…

Yes but by the definitions of laws like the Gun Control Act the AR-15 is not a firearm until it is assembled. Prior to that it is just parts, non-controlled.

If Roh’s case were to go to trial, by the findings of the judge involved, the very definition of what constitutes a firearm would have to change. And not in the favor of supporting the current regulatory and control systems in place.

Under the US Code of Federal Regulations, a firearm frame or receiver is defined as: “That part of a firearm which provides housing for the hammer, bolt or breechblock, and firing mechanism, and which is usually threaded at its forward portion to receive the barrel.”

This is two parts on many modern firearm designs, which makes neither one of those parts meet the federal definition of receiver. Even a Glock pistol doesn’t meet this definition as most of the parts referenced are held in the slide, not the frame.

To comply with ‘spirit of the law’ manufacturers have always picked a core part of their design to serialize, it did not have to meet the full federal definition of a receiver or frame.

The Conclusion

Roh, if he keeps his nose clean, gets to walk free from all charges in order to preserve the standing practices of federal firearms policy.

To legislate something effectively it must be defined.