Advertisement

BUYING YOUR FIRST CONCEALMENT PISTOL

I am often asked by family and friends to recommend or suggest a first firearm. And while I am honored to be trusted enough to be helping, I usually respond by asking, “What are you going to be doing with the gun?” The reasons for my question are several, and that usually provokes soul-searching and added thought by the person I’m helping.

Friendly Fire

I enjoy (and have gone through many times) the process of helping first-time gun buyers / first-time gun owners select the “correct” gun for them. The most interesting thing that I see when helping someone select their first handgun is that they usually end up with something completely different from what they initially thought.

I’ll tell you a story about a good friend of mine, who in her early 50s decided she wanted to get a gun. Again my first question to her was, “What are you going to be using it for?”  And she said, “Honestly, I’m not sure.” While I appreciated her honesty, I told her she needed to think about what she primarily wanted the gun for. 

Over the next few days we chatted a few times about exactly what she wanted her first gun to be. After our discussions, she finally decided that she wanted it to be a handgun and that it needed to also be easy to shoot / operate. She thought she was leaning towards a full-size service pistol.

So, I told her I had a variety of pistols that she could try and I would be willing to help out anyway I could. Over the next month or so, we went shooting with many different types of handguns, from revolvers, sub-compact and compact semi-automatics, up to full-size 1911s.

First Firearm Findings

After my friend had shot a wide selection of my handguns and was also shown the features of those guns, she finally ended up selecting the Springfield Armory XD-S in 9mm. I was slightly surprised that she picked this particular pistol, as initially she thought she wanted a full-size service pistol. After all the test firing of over a dozen different guns, my friend told me that the XD-S 9mm fit every requirement that she was looking for. The XD-S was a do-it-all handgun for her particular situation.

America!

You knew it was coming.

Enjoy.

Stay safe. Use sunscreen. Keep all your digits and limbs. And America the fuck on!

IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776

From Gadsden and Culpeper

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen United States of America

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.

New Hampshire:
Josiah BartlettWilliam WhippleMatthew Thornton

Massachusetts:
John HancockSamuel AdamsJohn AdamsRobert Treat PaineElbridge Gerry

Rhode Island:
Stephen HopkinsWilliam Ellery

Connecticut:
Roger ShermanSamuel HuntingtonWilliam WilliamsOliver Wolcott

New York:
William FloydPhilip LivingstonFrancis LewisLewis Morris

New Jersey:
Richard StocktonJohn WitherspoonFrancis HopkinsonJohn HartAbraham Clark

Pennsylvania:
Robert MorrisBenjamin RushBenjamin FranklinJohn MortonGeorge ClymerJames SmithGeorge TaylorJames WilsonGeorge Ross

Delaware:
Caesar RodneyGeorge ReadThomas McKean

Maryland:
Samuel ChaseWilliam PacaThomas StoneCharles Carroll of Carrollton

Virginia:
George WytheRichard Henry LeeThomas JeffersonBenjamin HarrisonThomas Nelson, Jr.Francis Lightfoot LeeCarter Braxton

North Carolina:
William HooperJoseph HewesJohn Penn

South Carolina:
Edward RutledgeThomas Heyward, Jr.Thomas Lynch, Jr.Arthur Middleton

Georgia:
Button GwinnettLyman HallGeorge Walton

Have a Safe and Fantastic Independence Day

Calguns and FPC Take on California

Calguns and the Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) groups filed a federal lawsuit on Monday, challenging California’s new law banning the sale of firearms to people under the age of 21, arguing those 18 and over are adults with legal rights to possess pistols and rifles.

“Once individuals turn eighteen, they are adults in the eyes of the law,” said John W. Dillon, the Carlsbad attorney representing the gun groups. “Law-abiding adults are entitled to fully exercise all of their fundamental rights, including their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms for all lawful purposes, not just hunting or sport.” – Via KTLA

The FPC

All adults not otherwise prohibited from having firearms have the same rights as others. Age-based discrimination in this context is unconstitutional and morally wrong. These adults could be called to fight and die for their country, but the State of California had prevented them from accessing the full scope of constitutional rights entitled to them under natural law and the Constitution. 

Individuals 18 years and older are considered adults for almost all purposes. For example, at 18 years old, U.S. citizens can (i) vote, (ii) fully exercise their freedom of speech, (iii) receive the full protections under the 4th, 5th, and 6th Amendments, (iv) enter into contracts, and (v) serve in the United States military. Indeed, male citizens over 18 years of age are designated members of the militia pursuant to federal statute, 10 U.S.C. § 246(a), and may be selected and inducted for training and service into the United States armed forces, 50 U.S.C. § 3803(a). As such, they are eligible to serve in the military, and to die for their country.

In addition, the “militia of the State” consists of both the organized and unorganized militia. Specifically, the State’s organized militia encompasses the National Guard, State Military Reserve and the Naval Militia. (Cal. Military and Veterans Code Section 120.)

“The unorganized militia consist of all persons liable to service in the militia, but not members of the National Guard, the State Military Reserve, or the Naval Militia.” (Cal. Military and Veterans Code Section 121.)

The Supreme Court in D.C. v. Heller recognized that through Congress’ plenary power, it organized all able-bodied men between 18 and 45 as part of the militia in the first Militia Act. (Heller, 554 U.S. at 596.) Thus, the Supreme Court recognized 18-to-20-year-olds as part of the militia; and as such, they necessarily have the right to keep and bear arms. Further, as affirmed in Heller, the right to keep and bear arms extends beyond the militia, reserving an individual right to keep and bear arms for all lawful purposes, “most notably for self-defense within the home.” (McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742, 780 (2010).)

This case seeks to protect and restore the Second Amendment rights of legal adults who are being prevented from exercising them because of California’s statutes and the Defendants’ policies, practices, laws, and customs they enforce.

This is a major case in the battle for gun rights that could set national precedent on what the 2nd Amendment truly protects. We need this win.

Aridus Industries and the Beretta 1301 Tactical

By James Lu 

Shotguns have become synonymous with hunting, home defense, and car rides. 

The shotgun is, by most accounts, an aged design, with first patents dating back to the mid-1800s. But without improvements to the existing “pump action” and “semi-auto” designs, shotguns have fallen by the wayside in favor of more modern platforms like the AR. 

The 1301

The 1301 is an extremely reliable semi-automatic gas-operated 12 gauge that comes ready to go right out of the box. With an 18.5 inch barrel, 5-round magazine tube, fully adjustable ghost ring sights, and a rail for mounting optics it’s already set up nicer than most factory guns. The compact synthetic stock has a 13-inch length of pull with aggressive texturing on both the stock and forend. 

The Beretta 1301 is also lighter than most shotguns weighing in at 6.4 pounds. Even though it’s so light, this is an incredibly soft-shooting 12 gauge thanks to the Beretta “Blink” gas system and rotating bolt. 

Beretta’s 1301 Tactical brings shotguns into the 21st century but, admittedly, still leaves some room for improvement.

Enter Adam Roth and Aridus Industries 

Aridus Industries is new to the scene, but Adam Roth is by no means an amateur when it comes to the shotgun. Roth has worked with industry giants like Steve Fisher, and Rob and Matt Haught—more on that later.

When it comes to employing the shotgun in self-defense or “social” situations, Roth has done his homework, and he offers a number of products for popular lines such as Remington 870, Mossberg 500/590, and the Beretta 1301.

Improving the 1301

Back to front, Aridus has done everything conceivable to make the 1301 user-friendly and ready for action. 

Starting with the stock. Shotgun stocks are notoriously long, too long for effective use in many cases for the defense role. Aridus takes full advantage of the Magpul ASA-1301 Stock Adapter to mount the Mossberg 500 Magpul Stock to the 1301 and still use the SGA receiver sling mount, if desired. This brings the length of pull from 13+” to a little over 12”.  

Q-DC

Moving forward is the item that put Aridus Industries on the map. The Q-DC is the Aridus answer to another age-old question about shotguns: How do I carry more ammo? 

There are several options out there for ammo carriers, ranging from plastic shell holders to elastic shell cards with Velcro backing, but Aridus has taken the concept a few steps further. The receiver adapter is machined from a block of 6061-T6 US-made aluminum with a durable type III hardcoat anodized finish. The parkerized steel latch and stainless steel torsion spring keep the carrier in place, and removing the carrier is as simple as depressing the torsion lever and pulling the carrier outward. Reattaching is even simpler, merely snap it into place along the receiver. 

On the side of the ejection port, Aridus makes a small, yet almost invaluable addition to the 1301’s shell removal system. This Beretta semi-auto is an excellent shotgun, but the stock shell removal system drops the bolt if pushed down on one end and drops all the rounds in the magazine tube if pushed down on the other end. It’s a nice idea when you’re hunting, crossing fences, or working administratively on the gun, but it’s not as desirable in a defensive encounter.

Aridus developed the YT-1301 Latch and Shroud, which all but eliminates the 1301’s ability to drop all its shells, essentially turning it into a bolt release only.

CROM

Aridus boasts the lowest optic mount currently on the market: the CROM mount. Their proprietary mount allows the user to mount any Aimpoint (RMR too) or similar clone low enough to co-witness the ironsights—a high feat in the world of shotguns.

The CROM mount was designed with input from Rob Haught, and a “Haught Mod” is available, which modifies the ghost ring to make it faster and easier to line up the sights. Using the CROM mount requires removing the stock rear sign and optic rail and swap to Aridus equipment.

Instructions and an installation video by Roth himself walk the user through the simple process. Please note that, if using the clone optic route, it is recommended to double-check dimensions to ensure your optic fits and you can reach the mounting hardware with the optic installed.

Zhukov 1301

The Beretta 1301’s stock forend is serviceable, but it lacks the ability to mount attachments. With a fair amount of engineering, Roth was able to modify the Zhukov handguard—originally developed for the AK platform—to create front and rear mounting adapters that allow it to integrate seamlessly onto the 1301s magazine tube. With the Zhukov, users can mount lights, sling points, extra shell holders, and more, as long as the M-LOK screws are cut or ground down from the to prevent interference with the 1301’s action. Some screws will clear, some will be long.

Beretta certainly hit a homerun with the 1301 series of shotguns, and Adam Roth at Aridus Industries helped them turn it into a grand slam and bring the 1301 up to the forefront of hard use gear.

Impact Weapons: An Overlooked Defensive Tool

(from ign.com)

[Ed:  This is the author’s update of a longer paper on impact weapons he originally wrote in 1994. Nothing in this article should be construed as giving legal advice. Please check your state’s statues, and consult with the police and/or an attorney. The author’s personal recommendations do not constitute DRGO’s—but they are well worth considering.]

Try asking friends or family this question:  “I’m going to say a word.  Please tell me the first word that comes to your mind.  Here is the word:  “Weapon”.  99% will probably say “gun” or “knife”.  A rare few might say “TASER” or “chemical spray”.  I predict no one will say “club”—even though the club was the caveman’s first weapon. It may have been a wooden stick or the bone of an animal, but the club extended his reach, and greatly multiplied the force of his arm, as he faced wild beasts and intruders. 

Legal considerations: 

Some states/municipalities have banned nun chucks, blackjacks and/or brass knuckles: for example, the Revised Statues of Missouri, Section 571.010.1 states the following: 

“(2) ‘Blackjack’, any instrument that is designed or adapted for the purpose of stunning or inflicting physical injury by striking a person, and which is readily capable of lethal use . . .

“(13) ‘Knuckles’, any instrument that consists of finger rings or guards made of a hard substance that is designed or adapted for the purpose of inflicting serious physical injury or death by striking a person with a fist enclosed in the knuckles”

Down through the ages, a wide range of impact weapons have been developed as part of the martial arts:  the Bo, Jo, Hanbo, Sai, Nun chuck, Tonfa, Escrima stick, and Kubotan®.  In medieval Europe, there were the mace, war hammer, Morningstar and Horseman’s pick.  Native Americas and African tribes also had impact weapons.  Police departments have long used a variety of devices:  the Sap, Billy Club, straight baton, PR-24, Rapid Rotation Baton, Persuader® Baton, collapsible baton and spring baton.  There is also the “Fighting Flashlight”1

For civilian use, there are the walking stick, the Irish shillelagh fighting stick, canes of various shapes and sizes, the keychain baton, tactical umbrella (www.unbreakableumbrella.com), tactical pen, and tactical flashlight. The latter example has two purposes: as an impact weapon and a disorienting light. Some companies still sell “sap caps” and brass knuckles. But why take a chance when there are better and legal impact weapons?

Comparison to other weapons:

1.  Firearms:  nothing matches the “reach” or lethality of a firearm.  But less-than-lethal force is often needed. Police officers are required to adhere to a continuum of force, i.e., use the least force necessary to resolve a situation.  “Force” may include verbal commands.  Civilians would do well to have more than one option than a firearm only.

2.  Knives:  in my opinion, these are over-rated as a self-defense tool.  To paraphrase Massad Ayoob: “You may well kill your attacker with your knife, but he may not die until 3 hours after he has killed you!”  Let’s assume that your attacker has a fixed blade knife with a blade of 6-to-12 inches; do you want to “face off” with your pocket knife, or one of the other weapons listed here? 

Years ago, I took a one-day ‘Knife Fighting Course for Law Enforcement’ and if the knives had not been rubber, I would have died a “death-of-a-thousand cuts”.  Leave knife fighting to Rambo!  Except for key-chain batons and tactical pens, all impact weapons have a longer reach than your attacker’s knife blade

Nonetheless, as a last-ditch defense, and as a workday tool, a pocket folding knife with a blade of less than 4” is handy, and legal in most states.  Whether you are a camper, hiker, boater, hunter or fisherman, there are a wide variety of suitable knives to choose from, useful both as an essential tool as well as a weapon.  Good knives don’t have to be costly, and they can be concealed in every room of your house.  But compared to knives, impact weapons are cheaper, require no maintenance, and can quickly stun/disable an attacker without inflicting lethal damage.  Like guns, knives are made to kill, not to stun/disable. 

3.  Other bladed weapons (swords, kukris, machetes, tactical tomahawks, etc.) are a large category worth discussing in a separate article.

4.  Pepper spray:  Most states do not classify this as a weapon, and it is inexpensive and effective for non-lethal use.  You can afford to have this tool in multiple places throughout your house.  While very unlikely, sprays can malfunction, and one cannot leave them in hot places, such as a car in the summer.

Impact weapons like the keychain baton can be easily concealed, and as pointed out in a previous article, are usually not seen as a “weapon” by law enforcement. Tactical pens can be carried in any setting, including work.  If you are out on a leisurely stroll in your neighborhood, a walking stick, cane or Escrima stick will not draw attention.  [Note: if you buy an Escrima stick, please make sure it is authentic, i.e., made of rattan2.]

A small tactical flashlight can be carried wherever you go.  Larger Mag-Lites are appropriate for the car or home.  Impact weapons are very inexpensive, so you can afford to have several, for your person, car, work and home. 

Any weapon requires training to use best, but it is not easy to find training for impact weapons.  Books, DVDs and on-line training videos are probably the best bet.  An old rubber tire hung from garage rafters makes an excellent target to be hit.  A heavy punching bag should also be able to stand up to the hits from an impact weapon. 

An impact weapon is an extension of your arm and greatly increases your power, while protecting you from 1) breaking the bones in your fist or wrist, 2) keeping the attacker from reaching you, and 3) protecting you from a knife or club that the attacker may be using.  Very skilled practitioners can learn the art of Sinawali, which involves using two identical sticks, knives, machetes, etc. in tandem.  Actress Milla Jovovich portrays this in the Resident Evil movies, in which she wields two kukris, and dispatches zombies.    

If you drive through poorer neighborhoods, you may see people carrying clubs of various types, e.g., golf club, stick, etc.  They realize that a club is a good defense against both two-legged and four-legged “wolves”.  While there are many “make-do” impact weapons like baseball bats, tire irons, etc., they have the following problems: 

  1. They are not designed as weapons, and lack versatility and balance;
  2. They have dubious legal status; and
  3. There are not many training programs for them.

My personal inventory:

  1. I have carried all of my keys on a Persuader® baton for the over 20 years. This impact tool is not seen as a “weapon”. I have been through many security checkpoints, such as federal and county courthouses, and Social Security offices without incident. However, I would not take it through an airport checkpoint; it travels in my checked luggage.
  2. Escrima sticks for walks and hikes, also strategically placed throughout the house.
  3. A Mag-Lite 4-cell ‘C’ size flashlight3 in the car. 
  4. Two 16” ASP® batons; one regular, one lightweight4.
  5. A 320-lumen SureFire® GX2 Pro Dual Output flashlight that goes into my pocket (or one of two holsters) when I go out at night, and also stays on the bedside table when I sleep.  In the event of a home invasion at night, this is the perfect flashlight for the ‘Harries technique’.
  6. A tactical pen made by Schrade®.   

From the caveman to the policeman, impact weapons have filled a much-needed purpose, yet have not received the recognition they deserve as an effective defensive tool. Check them out for yourself!

.

1  Two resources: 

  1. The book Flashlight Fighting:  How to Make Your Pocket Flashlight a Take Anywhere Self Defense Weapon, by Phil Elmore

2. Chapter 33 – ‘Fighting Flashlights’, in Massad Ayoob’s book, The Truth About Self-Protection.

Inexpensive and authentic Escrima sticks can be purchased from www.kaliescrima.com.

Mag-Lite no longer makes the 5-cell ‘C’ size.  For their full product line, go to www.maglite.com.  Unless you are a very strong person, I think you will find the ‘D’ size to be unwieldy; an impact weapon has to be able to swing fast!  Suppose you have an older, incandescent bulb Maglite, and don’t want to spend the money on a LED version; don’t despair – Amazon cells a converter device for only $13.95: the HQRP High Power 3W LED Bulb; easy to install and works perfectly. 

ASP® and Monadock® are the leading makers of collapsible police batons.  Like the distinctive sound of a pump shotgun being “racked”, the opening of a collapsible baton also makes a unique sound that will get the attention of an attacker.  Remember, the longer the baton, the heavier, and the slower, unless you have the strength to wield it quickly. 

.

.

— Warren Lind is a retired social worker, active in Missouri & Illinois gun rights groups, and a frequent local media contributor.

SIG SAUER P320 XFIVE Legion

SIG SAUER Introduces Ground-Breaking Innovation with the SIG SAUER P320 XFIVE Legion

NEWINGTON, N.H., (July 1, 2019) – SIG SAUER, Inc. is pleased to introduce ground-breaking innovation to the P320 pistol, and the expansion of the SIG SAUER Legion Series of pistols with the SIG SAUER P320 XFIVE Legion. The pistol features the exclusive TXG grip module developed by SIG SAUER engineers with a patent-pending process by infusing tungsten into the polymer material providing the weight of steel with the flex of polymer. Additionally, this is the first striker-fired pistol to be introduced to the Legion Series of pistols.

“We are really excited about the introduction of the SIG SAUER P320 XFIVE Legion to the market because it embodies the forward-thinking SIG SAUER mindset when it comes to product development,” said Tom Taylor, Chief Marketing Officer and Executive Vice President, Commercial Sales, SIG SAUER, Inc.  “The P320 XFIVE Legion is defining innovation and changing the game for competition pistols, and it’s these exclusive features that are designed to enhance the shooting experience that our Legion members have come to expect from us.  The grip module is heavier, substantially reducing felt recoil and muzzle flip, and the newly developed trigger reduces pull weight by up to 30% for a crisp, fast shooting experience – and that’s just the start.” 

The SIG SAUER P320 XFIVE is a 9mm striker-fired pistol, with the TXG tungsten infused heavy XGrip module, a Legion Gray PVD Slide with lightening cuts, 5” match grade bull barrel, and a lightened and skeletonized trigger.  The recoil assembly of the P320 XFIVE Legion has been upgraded to include a one-piece stainless steel guide rod and a 14lb. 1911-style spring, plus an extra 12lb. spring, allowing the end user to easily adjust the recoil spring for a customized shooting experience.  The pistol comes optic ready and is compatible with a SIG SAUER Electro-Optics ROMEO1PRO Optic or a standard DeltaPoint Pro Optic, features Dawson Precision® Fiber Optic front and adjustable rear sights, and comes with three 17-round magazines with anodized aluminum Henning Group base pads.

The Legion Series pistols are an exclusive product line developed by SIG SAUER based on input from elite shooting professionals, and designed to exceed the expectations of the serious shooter.  The SIG SAUER Legion is an exclusive members-only access program available to owners of the SIG SAUER Legion Series of firearms. Upon registration of any Legion Series firearm, members receive a complimentary case, a challenge coin matched to the firearm, exclusive access to Legion gear and merchandise, and receive exclusive communications from SIG SAUER and the Legion.

To learn more about the SIG SAUER P320 XFIVE Legion, watch Pistol Product Manager Phil Strader explain the innovative features of this pistol

The P320 XFIVE Specs:


Total length: 8.5”
Barrel length: 5”Weight (incl. magazine): 43.5 oz.
Height: 5.8”Width: 1.6”Sight Radius: 6.8:

The SIG SAUER P320 XFIVE pistol is now shipping.  

About SIG SAUER, Inc.
SIG SAUER, Inc. is a leading provider and manufacturer of firearms, electro-optics, ammunition, airguns, suppressors, and training. For over 100 years SIG SAUER, Inc. has evolved, and thrived, by blending American ingenuity, German engineering, and Swiss precision. Today, SIG SAUER is synonymous with industry-leading quality and innovation which has made it the brand of choice amongst the U.S. Military, the global defense community, law enforcement, competitive shooters, hunters, and responsible citizens. Additionally, SIG SAUER is the premier provider of elite firearms instruction and tactical training at the SIG SAUER Academy – a world class, state-of-the-art, 140-acre training facility. SIG SAUER is headquartered in Newington, New Hampshire, and has more than 1,700 employees across eight locations, and is the largest member of a worldwide business group that includes SIG SAUER GmbH & Co. KG in Germany. For more information about the company and product line visit: sigsauer.com.

Dear Amy …

Like most of you, I had never heard of the advice columnist called “Dear Amy” before last month. That all changed when she published a now infamous and uninformed answer to a question about firearms in the home.

For those who missed it, the original piece can be found here.

The TL;DR is that a father (totally not a troll or anything) wrote a letter asking what he should do about an adult daughter who moved back home, bringing her self-defense firearm with her. It was totally not a “normal gun” either. It was a dreaded semi-automatic with – *gasp* – HOLLOWPOINT bullets! You know -the kind that criminals use! This father locked his bedroom door at night now because he was afraid of what his daughter would do.

In reply to this bit of hysteria (which I find hard to believe was written by an actual father), the Dear Amy columnist trotted out “facts” like  – gun owners are more likely to hurt themselves, and that hollowpoint bullets explode [yes] – before agreeing with the father about his ultimatum to the daughter.

Obviously the Gun-i-verse did not take this lying down. “Dear Amy” received a well-deserved metaphorical beat-down for her ill-informed hysteria. Now apparently she has published a non-apologetic “apology” in which she continues to slam firearms owners and the firearms industry – because feelings.

If you are looking for an actual apology here, you’d better not hold your breath. Although she now recants the exploding hollow points claim, that’s about where her contrition ends.

In her own words:

“I definitely have a bias against the people who use guns to terrorize and kill one another. I also have a bias against the gun lobby that gaslights Americans into believing that gun ownership is not only a right, but also — these days — a necessity, as many readers have suggested.

Additionally, the disrespect, anger, violent language, and threats contained in many of the responses to this Q and A are, frankly, a great argument for stricter gun control.”

“Dear Amy” apparently believes that because people hurt her feelings with mean words that it is legitimate retribution to strip them of their Constitutional rights.

Just. Wow.

Additionally, she dismisses a civil right which is codified in the Constitution as nothing more than a “gaslighting” campaign by the “gun lobby”.

I just don’t have any words for this level of doubled-down dumbassery. It’s like she learned nothing the first time and bashed her head into a wall a second time just to prove to us evil gun owners how virtuous she is.

For someone who refers to herself as a “journalist” Ms Dickinson evidenced a stunning lack of background research before publishing her first screed. And she carried that unprofessionalism into her “apology”. She didn’t bother talking to anyone actually knowledgeable on the subject of firearms until she had publicly embarrassed herself. She then, after the briefest of mea culpas, proceeded into this second emotional outburst, castigating her critics for being mean to her, and reiterating her prejudices against lawful firearms owners.

After a tirade about “living in the world” and how traumatized she was as a “journalist” who spoke to grieving mothers, and what a bad thing “gun violence” is, she dropped this paragraph:

“And someone like me: small, physically inept, and — (according to many commenters) not too bright and/or possibly deranged — has no business wielding a gun. Most importantly, I don’t want to own a gun, and so I will exercise my right not to own one or allow one in my home.”

Ahhh, there it is. Ms Dickinson uses the classic psychological defense mechanism called projection. She projects her own feelings of ineptitude onto every firearm owner. Because she feels afraid and unqualified for firearm ownership, she declares that everyone else is too.

Allow me to address this part directly to the columnist:

Here’s the thing, Ms Dickinson – those of us who are “small [and] physically inept” are the VERY PEOPLE who benefit from “wielding a gun”.  A small woman can neither overpower nor outrun most male attackers. A firearm employed skillfully by a small woman can mean the difference between being raped and murdered by a man twice her size … and returning home safely to her family.

So please be careful who you paint with that broad brush of your own insecurities, Ms Dickinson. Some of us out here are quite capable, thank-you-very-much.

The columnist is correct in that she does have the right to refuse to allow firearms into her home – though I hope she remembers that vow when she wants the Po-Po to come investigate the sound of breaking glass in the middle of the night.

Violence done with evil intent is bad. We can all agree on that. We firearms owners “live in the world” too though. The difference between us and Ms Dickinson is that we gun owners choose to not just let “the world” happen to us. We take steps to turn the tide of events and do our best to not be borne helplessly along by the criminal element. If that means that we must be prepared to commit violence in order to stop violence being perpetrated upon us, then so be it.

A firearm is only a tool. It is the man or woman who wields it who determines whether that tool is used for good or evil. Despite the efforts of many to educate her, “Dear Amy” continues to miss this critical distinction.

So is the Trijicon SRO Designed for Duty Use?

Aaron Cowan over at Sage Dynamics answers these questions about the Specialized Reflex Optic. Trijicon released the SRO to a surprised audience and it made quite the impression at NRAAM.

Compatible with the RMR mounting footprint and with 1 MOA, 2.5 MOA, and 5 MOA dot sizes, the competition oriented SRO has a generous window and is very eyeball friendly. The SRO still has a 7075-T6 body and is a sturdy optic in its own right but the change in window design has given up some of the “ruggedized” nature of the RMR.

What’s the SRO’s Role?

Looking at the new optic myself and speaking with several people on the around the industry about the SRO’s place has come to a few salient points on it.

The SRO is a well designed red dot for handguns. Especially in the role of introducing red dots to shooters, the SRO has the window sizing to make dot acquisition easy. Top battery access mitigates loss of zero from a battery change. Excellent brightness adjustment and a brightness lock to set a setting are solid features to prevent confusion during adjustment. All in all the SRO took red dot design and optimized it for a highly useable while still durable format.

The SRO isn’t an RMR. It does not replace what the RMR can do. It occupies a different space in the red dot hierarch. It is not designed for “Duty Use” in regards to primary emphasis on extreme durability. The SRO is all about the usability interface, it exists to make a performance red dot easy.

Will it suit your needs? Maybe. I intend to find a place for one on a pistol or carbine, that 1 MOA dot and window are superbly easy to pick up and it lends itself well to very fast acquisition. The real question, do these features make it what you need?

Would you Trust your Life to the LifeCard Pistol?

With the firearms market flooded with small compact carry pistols, it is not often you come across something truly unique and different. You know the old saying, You can’t reinvent the wheel. Trailblazer Firearms tried to do just that with the LifeCard Pistol.

A single barrel, single-shot handgun that folds up to about the dimensions of a credit card and is just about a half of an inch thick. LifeCard only weighs 7oz. The entire gun is made of metal. The barrel, bolt, and trigger are made from 4140 pre-hardened steel and the frame and handle is made from billet aluminum. The package is coated in a very attractive black Corrosion Resistant Isonite and the aluminum is anodized. Its design is extremely clean and extremely subdued until you flip the latch to open it.

The handle features storage for 3 additional rounds of ammunition. To unfold/fold the gun you pull a very small slide latch down. The slide latch unlocks the handle. You can then fold it or unfold it. The process is fairly simple however, a bit difficult for anyone with normal size hands to operate quickly.

To load the gun, you engage another slide latch and pull the barrel upwards. You load the round directly into the barrel, then simply close the barrel back into the frame. To fire the gun, you pull a very small slide hammer into the fully cocked position and pull the now engaged trigger.

What is This Thing?

It is very obvious this is either a kind of niche market firearm, or a result of a “someone could so they did” situation. It is extremely lightweight and extremely concealable. It is also completely ambidextrous. Really the perfect recipe for a carry gun right? It fits in any pocket comfortably and extremely discreetly. Trailblazer actually says they designed the thing to be able to fit in your favorite breath mint tins. The size is definitely the main strength of this little guy. Chambered in .22 WMR adds a little more power over the earlier .22LR configuration.

It’s a firearm that can be concealed in any pocket, bag, or even in many undergarments.  It also has that head turning unique factor built in. 

Does it Make Sense?

It’s a single-shot .22 WMR handgun. Sure, you could definitely stop a threat with a .22 WMR. However, you only get one chance to do it with the LifeCard pistol. The process of firing that single round is just that, a process. Assuming you already have your single round of .22 WMR loaded into the barrel of your LifeCard, you now have to pull the tiny thing out of your pocket, purse, holster, bra, pack of cigarettes, or maybe even that hard to open mint container. Your nervous hand has to then figure out which side of the firearm is the barrel oriented on and make sure you are sliding the correct latch to open the gun.

Then, you need to grab onto the tiny little hammer on the back of it and try to pull it back to set the trigger in the fire position.  If this process was not enough, you now have to attempt to point this little tiny thing with no sights and only a 2.5-inch barrel at your target. If the bad guy was close enough that I needed to effectively engage him with this gun. Chances are, I am already going to be engaged in hand to hand combat and this thing will never be deployed since it requires 2 hands to operate.

While the gun does have a unique appeal to it due to its folding design, making it look nothing like a pistol. The overall size when it is deployed is comparable to something like the Ruger LCP. The LCP is really not much larger, ready to fire upon drawing, and holds at least 6 times the ammo in a much more powerful and more reliable centerfire cartridge. The price point on the Trailblazer LifeCard actually comes in higher than the LCP as well, with an MSRP of $399.00. You have multiple centerfire options that you could pick up instead with ammo and a holster and still come in less than just the LifeCard.

Shooting the Pea Shooter

The act of folding and unfolding really is very simple at the range when not under stress. It does take a slight amount of practice to understand the functions, but is pretty simple to operate overall.  Loading is as easy as opening the gun and then pull the second slide latch to release the barrel.  The barrel breaks open and closes itself pretty much by just letting it fall back in place. Prepping the gun to fire, pulling the small hammer back sets the trigger. Everyone that fired it was able to pull back the hammer and squeeze the trigger without issue.

Firing the gun is interesting. The recoil is not as bad as one would think. The odd rectangular shaped grip isn’t exactly ergonomic by any means, but it works. The LifeCard is pretty fun to shoot and definitely produced some good laughs at the range.  It throws a giant ring of fire towards the target which seemed to draw a whole lot of attention at a public range.

Accuracy is, well, it’s not. The LifeCard throws rounds where ever it wants. One round up high, the next shot down low, how the hell did that round hit the floor when I was aiming center mass? Yeah, it really has no accuracy.

The Choice is Yours

The LifeCard is a very entertaining unique firearm. I would not carry it as my only carry gun. However, I do think it would make an acceptable backup to my backup gun for EDC. If the straights are really that dire.

It would take a lot of practice to efficiently deploy in a high stress defensive situation. Its usefulness will certainly be up to each user specifically. For some, a gimmick, to others, it may be a solution. Regardless, it’s a unique and innovative design that holds up to Trailblazer Firearms slogan, LifeCard will be the last gun you’ll leave behind. Learn more at www.trailblazerfirearms.com.

Tavor Night Operations Course: The Bullpup Night School

Are you afraid of the dark?

This isn’t an inquiry to be funny or snarky. It isn’t meant to be rhetorical either. Consider the genuine question to get the gears turning for you. Are you afraid of the dark? Not illogically irrationally afraid but, more than anything, do you recognize why you should respect the dark. Respect it and do something about the challenges it brings.

The dark is environmental sensory deprivation.

Noun: a process by which someone is deprived of normal external stimuli such as sight and sound for an extended period of time. (emphasis mine)

This sensory deprivation is a potentially lethal complication in a situation where you need as much information as you can acquire as quickly as you can process it, self defense. Regardless of time of day or location of the situation, when you turn down the lights things change. Depriving the eyes of the levels of light they need to provide you the information you need is a serious situation. Positive identification (PID) of threats and non-threats is the difference between saving your life, dying, or going to prison.

Just to put this into perspective, in a study of shootings by LEO organizations 77 percent of police shootings are believed to occur under some degree of diminished lighting. 77% chance your eyes are going to be challenged to do their job.

Tavor Night Operations Course: TNOC

Own an IWI Tavor or X95? This course is for you.

Don’t own an X95, Tavor SAR? This course is still for you.

The opportunities to fire your rifle under dusk and dark conditions are nearly nonexistent due to most locations range rules. TNOC isn’t just a skills course. The skills are almost entirely covered in T1 already, a prerequisite for this course is passing T1.

Steve Fisher of Sentinel Concepts was on the range this weekend too. This phrase is never better illustrated than trying to make a decision in the dark.

TNOC is a proofing and inoculation course as much as it is a skills course.

Proofing a System

A proofing course determines whether or not a theory is viable. The theory in this case is: This is my “Kit” and it will work in the dark.

The combination of rifle, optic, and light are a system that must be proofed in order to assure that you can work them on demand, avoid gear conflicts, and address malfunctions. All, again, while in the dark.

Inoculation for Environment

Night time is uncharted territory for many, under practiced for nearly everyone. Shooting on a bright or overcast day is one thing. Shooting in the dark with little in the way of ambient light and, for a bonus twist, in the wet/rain while the temperatures is below the dew point is a whole different animal.

Here’s how your TNOC experience will break down. It’s actually fantastic, you can sleep in during the course.

Training Day – 1

Arrival time will likely be around 1500/3:00pm local. Unlike Tavor Operator 1 you won’t be waiting long to shoot. Safety brief, zero check, and right into drills.

Crash course/refresh time of the following.

  • Barrel/Sight relation – remember your offsets and distances
  • Reloads – lots of reloads from bolt lock. Stimulus induced response.
  • Positions and facing movements – foot work, safety, reduce injury chances
  • Malfunctions – Hard and soft, you will clear so many of these. Stimulus induced response.

Ok, you now hate all these things because someone forgot to take the track off of repeat. But you are still having a great time. Why? You’re running the gun hard and that happens far too rarely. Also…

Stimulus

Induced

Response

Stimulus Induced Response

Now that I have said that four separate times in two paragraphs… Why that redundant?

We are about to lose the use of our eyes for most of the easy tasks we take for granted. Our lights will brighten up the night down range but they aren’t going to do anything for me chamber checking the X95. I better learn to feel what the rifle is telling me as much as you or I see it in good light. The drills you run will build that.

The single greatest stimulus drill we did, and we repeated it ad nauseum, was a seven round iteration that has 3 separate stoppages.

Multi-Stoppage Clearance Drill – AKA Everything is Horrible! Why is this Happening!?

What you need:

  1. Full Magazine
  2. Empty Magazine
  3. Dummy Round(s)
  4. Empty Shell Casing

Set it up:

  1. Take the empty magazine and load 2 rounds into it [Mag: 2 live rounds, 2 total]
  2. Load the dummy round [Mag: 2 live, 1 dummy, 3 total]
  3. Load 2 more live rounds [Mag: 2 live, 1 dummy, 2 live, 5 total]
  4. Load the empty case in to the magazine backwards, primer end facing the chamber, slide it all the way to the back of the magazine. The case neck (hole where the bullet was) will be sitting above the rest of the rounds’ rims and primers in the magazine. [Mag: 2 live, 1 dummy, 2 live, 1 backward empty, 6 total]
  5. Take your full magazine and load your rifle
  6. Swap the full magazine for the stacked magazine of malfunctioning hell [Mag: 2 live, 1 dummy, 2 live, 1 backwards case, 1 live in the chamber, 7 total]
  7. Place the full magazine in a pocket or pouch as your empty gun/emergency reload

We used steel targets for this iteration, I recommend them for the instant feedback. Distance will be 50 yards and positions will be varied, not just strong side.

This is designed to get crazy…

Course of fire goals:

  • 7 hits on target
  • Fix/Clear all stoppages
  • End the drill with a ready rifle

Course of fire progression:

  1. On the command, engage the target for 7 hits
  2. After the first round fired the rifle will go to a hard stoppage: simulating a double feed, stovepipe, etc.
  3. Retain that magazine and clear the stoppage. Additionally, seek cover if safe and available to do so for your range.
  4. Reload with the retained magazine. Continue the drill.
  5. After 2 more shots the rifle will load the dummy and go to a soft stoppage: simulating failure to fire.
  6. Tap-Tug-Rack and continue the drill.
  7. After 2 more rounds the rifle runs empty. Reload.
  8. 2 more rounds will get you your 7th hit if you had no misses. Remember the drill is 7 hits, complete the drill.

The rifle will stop 3 times, more if there is an additional stoppage or you fail to clear one properly.

The point of this drill is to ingrain in you, the rifle’s operator, what the four major physical stimuli the rifle gives you feel like so that you can respond accordingly. Proper function, hard stoppage, soft stoppage, and empty.

This drill can easily get inside a shooters head. As a shooter worries about what’s coming next they miss what the immediate problem is. Focus on the immediate need of your rifle and the drill runs smoothly. If you’re shooting, shoot and hit. If the rifle stops fix it. You know a stoppage is coming but do your best to forget that and feel what the rifle tells you.

Fast misses and record time improperly cleared guns don’t award any points or solve your problems. Take the time and do them correctly.

“Lunch”

Or whatever the 9pm lunch equivalent is.

Eat, hydrate, rest… and talk gear.

One of the greatest opportunities you get in a course like this, where gear is a critical focus learning objective, is the opportunity to get first hand knowledge from guys like Tom and the other shooters on what they run and why.

We covered how the human eye responds to low light/no light. The peripheral vision is the stronger at night. White light nukes your night vision. When to use light is as important a question as how to. We conducted another once over of gear, controls, and placement with the downtime too.

Lights On

Weapon Mounted Lights (WMLs) are specialty tools. They have specific jobs and will, to a degree, be tailored for that job. So when considering a light here are a few guidelines. Note: You need a separate handheld light for your administrative functions. My choice there is still the ASP Tungsten.

  • Lumens: Recommended 500+, Minimum 300
  • Run Time at Maximum Output: 60 minutes +, Minimum 30 minutes
  • Controls: Momentary and Constant On, Disableable “Rave” setting… strobe shouldn’t exist on weapon lights

There’s far more that can be covered on specific lights for specific jobs, what light configurations work well in what roles, and the advantages and limitations of different specific lights. However the above is a starting point that should get you a useable light for the home defense role and out to about 50 meters.

Lights Off

Daylight gone. Weapon lights on.

All those daylight drills, including that multi-stoppage clearance nightmare, now shooting them all in the dark. The humidity was high, it was lightly raining, and the temperature dropped below the dew point… You want to see if your light and optic works? This is where that happens.

Rain obscures optical glass and optics have coatings that do darken them. The Vortex UH-1 “Huey” running on my borrowed X95 is not my favorite in the dark. In fact the experience killed all the interest I had in that optic. The Streamlight HL-X though, proved out well. Overall two lights failed out during the course, an oddball inside the handguard job that didn’t work for its operator to ID or engage any targets and another HL-X for an unknown issue. The HL-X that replaced the down one worked just fine and, if I recall correctly, the handguard oddity was supplanted by an OLight that also had no issues.

For science, and shits and giggles, I pulled out a different rifle at midnight with a Surefire M600DF and an ACOG. Of the three systems I ran that night, that combination was without a doubt my favorite. It proved out and will be a significant influence on the operational layout of the X95 SBR.

We rounded it out with a muzzle device demonstration between 4 common commercial types: A muzzle break (OSS), a compensator (BCM Mod 1), a flash hider (A2), and a suppressor (OSS). Muzzle devices are an important consideration when it comes to what you expect your rifle to do, choose accordingly.

…and there we called it a night.

PULLED OVER WHILE CARRYING – PART 1

Image via Reddit

Vehicle registrations expire, tail lights burn out, turn signals aren’t always used, drivers speed – knowingly or unknowingly. Life happens, distractions happen, violations happen. In return, police stops happen.

As a former LE agent, I am familiar with both sides of the coin of a stop. 

Police Expectations

Every police officer is shown countless videos where an officer is shot during a “routine” traffic stop. The majority of these incidents unfold very quickly and violently. The officer who is professional and experienced, makes these contacts cautiously (with good reason) and with purpose. Upon approach of the vehicle and during contact, the officer wants to see as much of the passenger compartment as possible and is cautiously aware of the hands of the occupants.

Windows Down and Light It Up

You can assist with the de-escalation of any contact by giving the officer as much exterior visibility access by:

  • Rolling down at least the driver’s side window prior to their approach.
  • Remaining seated.
  • Being patient — the officer might be checking the status of your vehicle and confirming the vehicle registration information prior to approaching your car.
  • Turning on dome lights at dusk and at night. This will help with visibility and give the officer the sense that you are a respectful and law-abiding citizen.

Hands Visible

After rolling the windows down, a good practice is to rest both hands on the very top of the steering wheel (11 and 1), allowing them to be plainly visible. Keep them there until directed to do otherwise.

Small Game Hunting Offers More Opportunity

Some of the rimfire targets I’ve gathered for practice.

My article about squirrel hunting earlier this year has led me down some rabbit trails of new information as I look into the possibilities for myself and my daughter.

I found this article to be full of good information for my beginner self.

What was really interesting is that I also found this article  – which discusses the almost heretical idea that introducing big game hunting in hunter recruitment efforts may create unrealistic expectations about expense and opportunity. Whereas small game hunting may offer more opportunity and more positive reinforcement, keeping the new recruits coming back more often than with big game hunting. 

It does make sense that in our zeal to set new hunters and youngsters up for success that we often create unrealistic expectations for the future.  Game commission sponsored youth hunts on lands with easy pickings that have been pre-scouted by somebody else, free gear, photos in the Game News magazine – none of that happens when you are ultimately out there doing it on your own. Ask me how I know. 

In several years of trying, the only times I have come home from hunts with meat has been on released hunts of pheasant and duck. Released hunts aren’t exactly real world conditions. Sure, you still have to make your shot, but you “know” the game is there, because someone put it out for you to find. Hunting wild game in the real world doesn’t work like that.

It seems funny that I found this article AFTER I had already come to the same conclusion based upon my own experience. But there it is. 

Some advantages from my own perspective to introducing small game hunting over big game hunting for attracting new hunters include:

-No special tags needed – just a basic license. No extra fees for doe tags, or lotteries for limited tags.

-No special equipment needed – no blinds or tree stands to buy. No dog to train. No boats or decoys needed. Maybe not even camo.

-A basic vehicle is fine. No pickup needed to haul out your deer. You can hunt squirrels or rabbits with a Prius (or a bicycle) and fit them in the game bag in your vest.

-You still get meat to eat.

-Taxidermy? Not really.

-You don’t need to spend months patterning the habits of rabbits and squirrels.

-You don’t need to spend hundreds or thousands on an outfitter and guide to go small game hunting.

-Ammo for small game is generally cheaper than the larger calibers that are required for big game. That makes practice cheaper too.

I’m still working on my own small game goals. I’ve purchased a rimfire rifle and already have a 20 gauge pump. I’ve purchased some little targets to practice with and renewed my hunting licenses for the year. 

Now I just have to carve out the time to practice. My gun club has rimfire silhouette matches, which I should probably investigate. That would give me practice AND mentorship this summer.

I might be getting ahead of myself, but I’m already looking at recipes for squirrel and rabbit for the Fall. I’ve gotten my hopes up every year for deer season and have been disappointed. Here’s hoping that THIS hunting avenue will net me some actual dinner this hunting season!

Self-Selection: An Overlooked Factor in the Gun Debate

(from pitchfork.com)

It’s probably not what you think, so let me explain the context.

One of the obvious missions of the anti-gun lobby is to magnify the negative consequences of widespread gun ownership in America.  As you probably know, they do this in several ways.

Most notably, while discussing rare and highly disturbing crimes like mass murders of children, they throw out a number that represents all types of gun deaths.  This distracts attention from the fact that most gun deaths are suicides and most gun murders are criminals killing each other.  Misdirection is a cheap trick, but it keeps working well enough that it’s been a go-to tactic of anti-gunners for years.

Another tactic is to compare U.S. gunshot deaths with a carefully selected group of “developed” countries.  If you cherry pick the data carefully, you can make the U. S. look like a very dangerous place that is desperately in need of more authoritarian gun laws.

A more realistic measure of violence is to compare our country with all countries and use the overall murder rate rather than just gun deaths.   If you do that, the U. S. is right in the middle of the pack.  There is no tsunami of death—our murder rate has been declining for decades.   If you look beyond the primary source of homicides, gangs and drug criminals in certain cities, America is one of the safest countries in the world.  Not bad for a stressed-out, multi-ethnic society with lots of freedom and from 350 to 600 million guns in civilian hands.

So, with such a huge number of guns in a turbulent society, why isn’t our overall murder rate sky high?

One reason is never mentioned in gun law discussions.  No, I’m not going to throw statistics at you.   This theory is strictly based on my own observations, what I call “ground truth.”

Everyone in my large circle of friends knows I’m a gun guy.  I’ve taken many novices to the range to introduce them to safe gun handling.  It’s one of my passions.  I’ve had many more chat with me privately about their personal feelings regarding gun ownership.

I’ve learned that people generally know when they are not suited to taking on that responsibility.  I’d love to have a dollar for every time someone told me they don’t trust themselves to keep a gun around.  They worry about their temper, their ability to react appropriately in an emergency, their use of intoxicants, their relationship issues and other factors that affect their mental state.

The biggest reason we don’t have an astronomical rate of gun deaths is simple:  people generally choose the best option for their own circumstances without orders from the nanny state.   This “self-selection contradicts the idea that we need to be micro-managed for our own safety.

As a result of self-selection much of what the anti-gun lobby claims they want to accomplish has already been done individually by the people themselves at zero cost.  No tax money expended, no freedoms restricted, no need for state-mandated mental health exams.

This theory of self-selection is one of several important reasons that gun control laws  have no measurable effect.  It’s been ignored in the gun control debate, probably because it can’t be weaponized in the war on liberty and our civil rights.

.

.

Dr. Tim Wheeler

—Dr. Michael S. Brown is a pragmatic Libertarian environmentalist who has been studying the gun debate for three decades and considers it a fascinating way to learn about human nature and politics.

All DRGO articles by Michael Brown, OD

Supreme Court Axes Mandatory Sentencing Law

The US Supreme Court on Monday struck down 18 USC § 924(c)(3)(B), a major federal statute with mandatory sentences for crimes committed with firearms, as unconstitutionally vague.

The law, for those unfamiliar, is one that structures criminal sentencing for crimes and adds time for use of a firearm during the commision of a crime or a firearms presence during the commision of a crime.

Justice Gorsuch wrote the majority opinion, a 5-4 ruling, which stuck down the long standing law as vague. Those sentenced under the law will be having their sentences and convictions adjusted according to the ruling. Specifically Maurice Davis and Andre Glover who were sentenced for a string of gas station robberies in Texas under the now struck law.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote the dissent. He argued that the law has been successfully applied in tens of thousands of cases seemingly without issue. He further argued that the majority’s ruling now may lead to resentencings and releases of numerous inmates decades earlier than Congress intended in writing 924(c). He additionally argued that the majority actually created additional confusion by making numerous crimes that would have qualified now unable to be charged.

Not every firearms case taken up by a court is a bastion of 2nd Amendment justice. Some, like this one, show just how deep and weird the legal system gets when it comes to the rules, regulations, and sentencing structure for crimes.

I’m truly curious how many sentencings this will reduce in the end.