Advertisement

​​Update: Canik Rival-S SFx

Canik Rival-S with PHLster Floodlight 2

A few months ago, I had the chance to shoot and review Canik’s new for 2023 fully metal striker fired pistol, the SFx Rival-S. I really enjoyed shooting that gun so much that I kept shooting, practicing and competing with it even after finishing the original reviews. My earlier accounts linked above only covered approximately the first 300 rounds I put through the pistol.

At some point after those 300 rounds, the gun started having malfunctions more and more frequently. Initially I ruled out my own handloads, tried different factory Canik magazines, etc. I made my best effort to try to cancel out all possible variables by process of elimination. I kept up this trial and error process for almost another 300 rounds or so. After participating in a match where the gun malfunctioned at least once in every stage and also had it interrupt a different practice session, I decided to contact Century Arms. While not an exact count, I estimate that by this point the pistol had just shy of 600 rounds since I took possession. When I reached out to them, I took the time to write a detailed email and send several photos explaining what my issues were. They responded the following day with a pre-paid label, so I shipped the gun back to them. Almost exactly a month later, FedEx dropped off my repaired SFx Rival-S at my doorstep.  

RIVAL-S MALFUNCTIONS

I had three distinct issues with my malfunctioning pistol. The first was that every time I inserted a freshly loaded magazine and hit the slide catch, the slide wouldn’t bring itself into battery automatically. It would drag and I had to push the slide into battery more often than not. When I first started shooting this gun, this was not happening as much and I had just assumed that both the brand new gun and brand new mags needed some time to “break-in”. Obviously once this kept happening well after the 300 round mark, my opinion changed.

The second issue was that the gun kept jamming in a very specific way: the nose of any FMJ bullet would get caught at the bottom of the feed ramp and block the slide from moving forward. I can best describe it as the bullet’s nose becoming lodged in a nook between the magazine and the bottom edge of the feedramp. Initially I wondered whether this was an issue with my handloads as I like to seat 9mm rounds with an overall length of 1.150”. That measurement is on the longer side but it’s well within SAAMI specifications. When factory rounds started jamming this way too, I figured it probably wasn’t my handloads. At the time, I also assumed that this was part of the reason why I had to push the slide into battery. I assumed that on the times when the rounds didn’t outright jam and seize the gun, that the bullet’s nose would still drag enough to prevent the slide from going into battery on its own.

Inconsistent extraction was my last issue. Sometimes I’d get a double whammy with a malfunction like the one I described above while also have an un-extracted fired casing that got left behind in the chamber. Other times, when shooting the last round in a magazine, the slide would lock back and the spent casing would merely be resting on top of the magazine’s feedlips (as if the slide didn’t have enough spring power to bounce the spent casing off the ejector).

Initially I tried troubleshooting everything myself with a common sense approach. Was it my handloads? Let’s try factory ammo. OK, maybe try different mags (I have a total of five factory Canik 18-round magazines made by Mec-Gar). When I was shooting this gun, I stole some OEM Mec-Gar +2 extended basepads off some Mec-Gar Beretta 92 mags I had to use with the Rival-S. Those actually ran fine at first before the set of problems began to manifest. Eventually, I ruled out these +2s as well. Regardless, I had issues with bone stock brand new Mec-Gar Canik mags anyway. At the time of the troubleshooting, I had a Trijicon SRO mounted to the slide using the provided Canik #2 factory plate. I checked to see if any of the mounting screws were protruding and getting in the way. Nope. Not that either.

HOW CENTURY ARMS FIXED MY RIVAL-S

After Century Arms returned my repaired gun to me, they also included a work order summarizing everything they did to that pistol. My Rival-S was stripped down and inspected and they polished the feed ramp. All critical springs were replaced with stronger upgrades including the original extractor and recoil springs. Outside of the gun, Century Arms replaced each basepad on all 5 of my factory magazines. The work order also claims that they test fired it with 90 rounds. After receiving the repaired handgun, it was oiled and lubricated, and returned to me in a basically in like-new condition. Because the gun had the same external wear and handling marks as before, I knew they sent me the same gun. The weight of the new recoil spring was certainly noticeable when racking the slide.

BACK TO THE FIRING LINE

To save myself some time, instead of mounting and zeroing the SRO back on, I decided to just shoot it with the already dialed-in factor rear iron sights. When I sent the gun back, its round count was a little less than 600. The work order claims that they fired 90 more rounds to function test it. Since having the gun in my possession again, I’ve fired at least 156 rounds (+/- a magazine loaded with loose rounds). All of these rounds were factory loaded ammunition including 124-grain South African PMP, 124-grain Federal American Eagle FMJ, 124-grain Fiocchi FMJ, 115-grain Blazer Aluminum and 115-grain Winchester White Box (USA9MMVP)*. This puts the current round count between 800-850 rounds. Merely blasting away at the same target with all that ammo would be boring and a waste of time, so I did as much as I could get away with at the indoor range in lieu of a proper shooting bay. I shot at least 50 rounds at 25-yard NRA B8 targets. The rest of the ammo was used for Bill Drills or for doubles. Honestly, I’ve not had any issues with the Rival-S since they fixed it. I think it’s ready to go back to USPSA.

Satisfactory group with Winchester 9mm during my recent “re-testing:”. Curse that stupid flyer low and to the right. I’m pretty sure that was shot #6.

IN SUMMARY

Around the same time I was having issues with my own specimen, I started hearing about others’ issues with these guns as well. Not all Rival-S shooters were equally affected. Some people at my club who were breezing along just fine with their pistols and round counts way higher than mine. At the same time, I wasn’t the only one having issues either. Whether it was factory ammo or handloads didn’t matter too much either. Honestly, I don’t have enough information nor have I been in touch with Century Arms since they sent me the RMA. If you know something, I’d actually like to learn more because I wasn’t sure if this happened to certain batches or just a handful of pistols. Even with the issues, I’ve had a lot of fun reviewing and shooting this gun. Its a full-size, heavy gun that has a more than decent match-ready striker fired trigger and it lends itself quite well to accurate shooting. Because the Canik’s action and semi-automatic mechanism borrow from the Walther’s tried and true designs, I knew the issue wasn’t some type of fatal flaw from a new design. Every gun manufacturer has had and will have issues that come up–what matters is how a company handles and fixes things. In my case, Canik and Century Arms did right by me and they deserve credit.

PS

**That specific Winchester 115-grain factory load is on the warmer side and “feels” like a +P from the way it recoils. With as warm as it is, it was giving me problems prior to sending the gun in. I decided to put aside the remainder to test it in the gun again. No issues. It actually groups fairly decently at 25-yards. Aside from the issues discussed in this article, I’m still of the opinion that the Canik SFx Rival-S does need a light break-in period.

The Magazine Over-Insertion Issue

This is a last minute addition to this post, as I just found out about this particular issue. (7/23/23)

After looking over a few YouTube videos like this one, it seems that some Rival-S shooters are experiencing reliability issues due to magazine over-insertion. That could obviously cause the slide to drag on the feedlips and interrupt proper cycling. Maybe it explains why I had to push the slide into battery sometimes. I’d like to note that every magazine I had did have its basepad replaced with a thicker one (presumably to prevent over-insertion). I sincerely have no idea to what extent this is an issue on the entire fleet of Rival-S pistols. If you have one of these guns, this is probably something to keep in mind and look over on your particular pistol. Where it gets tricky is that sure, adding a thicker basepad to a standard mag will prevent over-insertion–but what about when you run magazines with extensions for Carry Optics, Limited, Limited Minor or Open? Using the o-ring or the spacer would seem prudent, in any case.

LongPup gets Longer – Springfield Armory

Springfield Armory® is proud to announce two new variants of the Hellion™, offering enhanced ballistic performance with 18” and 20” barrel length options and unique features true to the original VHS-2 design.

Based on the internationally proven bullpup employed by the Croatian armed forces in demanding environments ranging from Iraq to Africa and beyond, the Hellion offers American shooters a semi-automatic version of this highly capable and fully ambidextrous firearm. The newly released variants feature extended 18” and 20” barrels, resulting in a 5.56mm that still offers the compact handling characteristics of a bullpup, but with enhanced velocity and downrange performance.

In addition, the 20”-barreled version of the Hellion features an overall configuration similar to that of the Croatian VHS-D2, a designated marksman version of the VHS-2. The 20” Hellion is outfitted with a distinctive ribbed forward section of barrel for enhanced cooling as well as an integrated bayonet lug.

Now, why did I say LongPup? Well the VHS-2 has an adjustable length of pull on the stock and it is… more than average to begin with. I like the feature in concept but the actual dimensions are for NBA and NFL proportioned folks.

That ribbing aside (and the barrel cooling ribbing on the 20 is neat) I like that the bullpup offerings in the US, especially of actual service rifle designs, is expanding. The VHS-2 Hellion has some ergonomic quirks to be sure, but it is an eminently runnable rifle. I still want to see Lithgow bring in the F90 updated AUG variants into country too. Get the whole updated mix.

I’m ultimately looking forward to seeing the Hellion and its aftermarket join strong offerings like the leading X95 in being 5.56 NATO for everyone.

The Armaspec XPDW Gen 2

I love the look and feel of PDW stocks almost as much as I love a good supportive Magpul SL stock. Maybe it is purely the look of the stock, or maybe it’s the fact they can be ultra-compact. Whatever the reason is, they are cool as hell. The problem with most is the fancy buffers and tubes they require, which makes the entire package expensive and utterly ridiculous. Luckily, a little company called Armaspec sent me their second generation of the XPDW Stock. The twist is that it doesn’t require a fancy buffer or buffer tube to attach.

The XPDW stock attaches to a MILSPEC tube via an adjustable screw beneath the stock. It slaps on and attaches with ease. The stock looks clean and simple. Admittedly it’s not the shortest PDW-type stock. There are limitations when it comes to using a MILSPEC tube, and one is limiting the overall shortness of the design. However, at 6.875 inches, when fully closed, it cuts some space from the standard stock.

The Armaspec XPDW Gen 2 – In Color

The XPDW is built like an absolute tank. It’s made entirely of metal and built in the United States. It offers five positions for total adjustability. Don’t be an idiot like me and install it on a rifle with a pair of sling mounts of the butt plate. I installed it on a CMMG Resolute, and CMMG pouts some real care into the assembly of their rifles. I’ll need some time and effort to remove that butt plate, but I plan to do so soon.

The XPDW also features a single sling QD point beneath the stock, which is a nice touch, and it made it easy to attach my Magpul sling and loop it over for easy use. The adjustments are very simple to make and allow you to move it back and forth with nothing more than gravity as soon as the lock is released.

Finding the right length of pull isn’t tough, and the adjustments give you good space. The XPDW stock mounts easily and can be swapped from gun to gun pretty easily. While I currently have it on a full-length rifle, it’s really better suited for an SBR.

At the Range

PDW stocks typically have a few flaws. They tend to be somewhat uncomfy, and they also tend to wobble and wiggle. That’s not the case here. The stock lockup is quite tight, and there is no wiggle or wobble. Additionally, the stock isn’t uncomfortable, and it provides an excellent amount of support and a great cheek weld. While the stock is all metal with no give, it doesn’t hurt or punch with recoil.

The XPDW delivers quite a nice degree of comfort and makes long shooting sessions a comfortable affair. The stock fits nicely into the pocket of the shoulder and pivots up and in with ease. Swapping shoulders is simple as the gun rolls off one and onto another. Using optics isn’t difficult, and I can fit naturally right behind my red dot.

The stock surprised me. The installation was simple, it was affordable for a PDW-type stock, and it used a standard MILSPEC tube. On top of that, the numerous downsides associated with PDW stocks are all gone. No wiggle, no wobble, or major discomfort. Plus, I have a cheek weld! It’s not the shortest or the lightest PDW stock, but the XPDW is most certainly one of the best-built and simplest options for the end user. Peep it here.

Book Review: The Way Is In Training 

The Way Is In Training

Earlier this year, Greybeard Actual, also known as Matt Little, published his book The Way Is In Training. Mr. Little penned this treatise in 2022 and it covers everything and anything that pertains to learning, training and cultivating martial skills. The Way Is In Training should be an obvious interest for anyone interested in the topics of firearms skills development, competition, martial arts, physical fitness and most importantly the philosophy that accompanies these topics.

The Way Is In Training can be described many different ways. At the aggregate level, it’s like a textbook with so many different topics, chapters and sections relating to life, applied violence, fitness, mindset etc. Unlike the typical textbook, this isn’t a boring dry tome. The whole book is full of things like Mr. Little’s photos, personal details, along with recollections of colleagues, comrades and competitors. 

Mr. Little and I became acquainted while attending the same local USPSA matches. Funny enough, I bought my copy of this book from him in the parking lot after a match one Saturday. At the next match, I told him, “Man, I wish someone would have bought this book for me when I was 18 years old.” And that’s the best way to concisely describe what The Way Is In Training is all about. If you’re interested in guns, training, shooting and everything else about that world, this is the book you wish you had when you were a young man. Its pages are packed with plenty of lessons and examples or things to critically focus on. I’m confident I’m not speaking only for myself when I say this, but a roadmap on showing you how to best circumvent the bullshit when I was younger would have been nice.

The fact that The Way Is In Training is laden with philosophical references and motifs is probably my favorite aspect about this book. Mr. Little readily illustrates the influence of works like Miyamoto Musashi’s Book Of Five Rings or Yamatomo Tsunetomo’s Hagakure have had on his life. Besides those, other luminaries like the Roman emperor and philosopher Marcus Aurelius are discussed. The philosophical content of The Way Is In Training resonates with me deeply because I’ve reached a point in my own personal “skills journey” where I’ve recognized its true value. In fact, in order to advance even higher in skill you have to truly embrace this stuff. Mr. Little covers Musashi’s concept of “no-mind” or mushin for example. Understanding this concept isn’t too complicated but it’s mandatory in order to level up. 

Both the first and last parts of The Way Is In Training cover philosophical concepts and mindset. That said, the “meat” of this book is full of concrete and practical information and lessons. And it’s quite comprehensive too. Topics covered include things like daily nutrition, tactical medicine, striking, tactics or even how to teach others. There are too many examples to list here, but from cover to cover, The Way Is In Training covers nearly 150 different topics divided across five sections. The boon for the reader of this book is getting to enjoy a neatly packaged collection of Mr. Little’s lifetime of experiences.

In addition to his own experiences, Mr. Little includes many useful lessons and materials from other sources too. Throughout the book, a plethora of high level shooters and their useful drills are mentioned. Names like Frank Proctor, Les Kismatorni, Todd Luis Green, Bill Wilson, Alex Acosta and Hwansik Kim among others come to mind. Although Mr. Little himself is an instructor who teaches classes of his own, he still includes other instructors and their shooting standards such as Scott Jedlinski from the Modern Samurai Project or Mr. Gabe White.

Besides all of the philosophical concepts covered (which I think are useful to anyone who reads this book), all of the practical knowledge contained in the book is neatly organized so that anyone can keep coming back to it as needed. It’s there for those wishing to refresh or looking for the next steps as they figure things out along their training journey. Once again, a work like this one would have been so useful for my younger self. 

About The Author

Matt Little is a career US Army Special Forces soldier who concurrently served as a career Chicago PD SWAT officer. Either line of work afforded him with a wealth of knowledge and experiences which he poured into his book, The Way Is In Training. Now retired from two careers of service which have spanned most of his adult life, Mr. Little still remains active as an avid dynamic pistol competitor both in USPSA and IDPA. He and his wife Angela run a training company, Greybeard Actual, that offers shooting and tactics courses to both civilian and Law Enforcement students. Please click here to learn more about Greybeard Actual.

The Way Is In Training is available from Amazon in many formats including paperback, hardcover, kindle or audiobook. Alternatively, if you run into him at a match, he might sell you one from the trunk of his vehicle. ;) 

Ned Kelly – The Iron Outlaw

We love outlaws. We romanticize them, we turn them into legends, and they fill us with wonder. Men and women who are truly free, although someone is seemingly always trying to imprison them. The best outlaws are the ones with a righteous cause or perhaps at least a righteous justification. Ned Kelly is one such outlaw. Ned Kelly comes from the land down under, and in the 1880s, he, his brother, and two friends rose to hell after an incident involving a policeman and the imprisonment of his mother.

He went on the run, and like all outlaws, he was packing some heat. He engaged in numerous shootouts and famously once wore a suit of bulletproof armor, and he earned the name the iron outlaw. Although, iron outlaw could equally apply to the iron he was packing.

Kelly’s Sawn-Off Carbine

Ned Kelly’s first gun appears to be some no-name carbine chambered in the popular .577 caliber. This rifle was apparently quite old by the time it made it to Ned’s hands. It famously features a sawn-off stock and trimmed barrel on top of a lack of a handguard. Additionally, there doesn’t seem to be any sights. This was the rifle Kelly used to shoot Constable Lonigan.

Lonigan was part of a team hunting Kelly and his gang. While in the bush, the group of policemen split into groups of two. With two out scouting and two staying at the camp. Kelly and his gang got the drop on the two policemen left at the camp. One policeman was unarmed, and Lonigan went for his revolver leading Kelly to shoot him and instantly kill him. The Kelly gang seized the remaining police weapons.

Most existing photos are quite old and small. The reason is that the Melbourne Museum of Applied Science through the rifle out in the 1950s. Why is unclear, but the rifle is currently lost.

Snider Enfield of .577 Caliber – aka Betty

Ned and his gang were folk heroes well before he died. He had quite the following as he raised hell down under. He and his gang were given many weapons by those who believed they were righteous. Ned and the gang were also known to steal rifles. In this case, they cornered a group of kangaroo hunters, and Ned took the Snyder Enfield from a man named Henry Dudley.

It was said to be his favorite rifle. He carved the initial K into the stock and reportedly carried the rifle everywhere. Kelly and his gang attempted their own revolution and launched the Republic of North Eastern Victoria. When that went wrong, Betty was hidden amongst other rifles from the failed attempt. It was recovered in the 1960s and is now part of a Kelly display.

Colt Navy Revolver

Ned Kelly carried a .36 caliber Colt Navy revolver in his last stand. He had taken the gun from a Senior Constable during a hold-up in Jerilderie. Kelly wielded the gun, dressed in his armor, as he shot it out with police. The Colt Navy was a bit out of date by the 1880s, but Kelly used what he could. The gun was a six-shooter but would be very slow to reload and not necessarily possible in the midst of a gunfight. The weapon was recovered after the last stand and currently sits in the Victorian Collections.

Colt 1849 Pocket Revolver

The Colt 1849 Pocket Revolver wasn’t quite the pocket pistol we are used to. They were fairly large but small for the era. Think of them as the Glock 19 of their era. Small enough to carry but big enough to be potent and easy to use.

Ned Kelly carried a .31 caliber revolver, but it’s not entirely clear exactly where he acquired it. It’s believed this weapon was the first he wielded during his last stand. He fired five shots from it before switching to his Colt Navy.

The Gang

Amongst the Ned Kelly core gang and later expanded group, there were shotguns, revolvers, revolving rifles, Martini-Henry rifles, and Spencer Carbines. It’s likely Ned used a great many different guns, but these are the ones we know for a fact he carried and used. Like many outlaws Ned’s life is complicated, violent, and ended early. He’ll likely continue to fascinate students of history and outlaws, and it’s easy to see why.

More Barrel Talk – 9-Hole Reviews

If you’re asking what barrel length you should get on a carbine there needs to be some additional context to get good answers. The 9-Hole crew has a good, and mercifully short, video on some general principles of barrel length selection.

These context defining questions are often.

  1. What do you want it to do?
  2. What do you need it to do?
  3. What do you already have?

What do you want it to do?

Your rifle. Your role. This question is actually a question series, it encompasses everything from your budget to comforts to legal conformities for your region.

Example, if the NFA were not in existence the most popular and common barrel length of AR-15 would likely be 14.5″ instead of 16″ in length. Why? GWOT. The M4 was and is our carbine.

Transfering intent to the home we usually want our AR to do what the M4 did. Be a simple and efficient general purpose carbine. It has reach but is easier to move with than the M16/20″ guns and can cover down on things well. Ammunition, following the M4, is also built with that barrel and has system in mind.

But you may have a requirement or a legal parameters, like the NFA existing, that changes all the calculus. Thus the 16 inch barrel became the commercial standard, it was the closest and most convenient thing to the M4. It also came with a few ballistic benefits in good rifles with a little more speed and and little more legs. The M27 uses a 16″ barrel by design and the Marines aren’t under a requirement to do so, it is the most accurate of the three service weapons.

So sketch out your ideal within all the parameters present and narrow down the field. This will also quickly track you into buy or build. I recommend buy. Building is fun, but a professional company making serious firearms for serious purposes can back their gun better than your buddy’s basement build.

What do you need it to do?

Image by RMFA Photography, J. Sarkody

Need is the emphatic series of questions that trims the wants. If you can’t get the list that you want, what do you need? This will lean heavier into the legal side of things too. Do you need it to be a Title I gun? Do you need it to be legally a handgun? Do you need to use a certain optic or ammunition type? What fits your budget?

Use those needs and start picking apart your wants. You might get it all. You might get some. You might determine that one of your ideals are too problematic due to legalities (wanting a 12.5 SBR for example) and instead go with a 13.7 and a specific muzzle to meet Title I requirements.

That all brings it back to the 14.5/16 permanent length guns, they are usually perfectly adequate to the needs list. If they are not, then don’t pick one for convenience.

I’m a 14.5 advocate, supremacist one even might say, as the most mobile and do it all barrel length for the least hassle. The most inconvenient part is selecting a “permanent” muzzle device. Not that much of a hassle and permanent only in the legal sense for NFA purposes.

What do you already have?

By extension of this question we are hitting back on the first one too. What do you want and why does this new rifle do that better than anything you currently have?

If you, like many of us, have already acquired a 16″ of some sort as a baseline rifle your options expand. You’ve put an adequate optic suite on and it does what you ask it to, so the next rifle can be far more specialized without compromise. You can get an SBR for compactness or you can get an SPR for precision and distance. You can clone and update the capabilities of your current rifle with the new one and have redundancy. You can try some more out there items like triggers, optics, non-standard controls, and the like without worrying about compromising the reliability of your base rifle. You can get a test bed or a specialist. You can get both.

You can also use this as an A/B test to see if upgrading the current rifle makes more sense than acquiring a 2nd.

In all instances it will condense down to getting what you want out of the gun and its accessories. But when buying for efficiency more than for fun the conversation must look at the efficiency pain points. Those points are, assuming a rifle of acceptable quality from literally anyone, not likely to be in the gun itself.

So ask the questions. Get the answer. Buy accordingly. Don’t overthink it.

Also, you don’t need it chrome lined, you don’t need it cold hammer forged, you don’t need 1:7 twist. It just needs to be quality nitride or stainless steel with a good rifling cut and those are hallmarks of CHF CL barrels.

Gunday Brunch 113: Gun Friend Etiquette

The boys are back and they’re talking about the best sort of etiquette for when your gun friends visit from out of town. Should you have a loaner burner on hand? Spare ammo? Let us find out

Modern Sporting Rifle is A Dumb Term

Commonly Owned AR-15
Photo Credit: CRPA.org

The anti-gun world loves these vaguely amorphous terms they can use to catalog whatever firearms they want. They use terms like Saturday Night Special and Assault Weapon to try and raise support for banning the most common firearms out there. The gun world isn’t exactly innocent about it, either. A few years back, we adopted the term modern sporting rifle and began playing semantics back. Modern sporting rifle, or MSR, was a term we applied to AR-15s and similar semi-auto rifles. 

It seems clever, but in reality, it was pretty dang dumb. The term was us trying to counter the term assault weapon. The thing is, we never had to counter that term with another term. We were, and continue to do, a great job of countering terms like assault weapons by just asking a simple question. “Please define assault weapon.” I’ve loved seeing it become the almost universal retort to any proposed ‘assault’ weapons ban. I see it across social media channels and forums like Reddit constantly. 

Modern Sporting Rifle – Words Matter 

Playing their game and using amorphous terms was never a route to success. Modern sporting rifle means jack all. There are modern lever actions and bolt actions, and maybe my rifle isn’t for sporting purposes. The entire concept of sporting purpose was an anti-gun talking point in the first place. Don’t get me wrong, the AR series are excellent hunting rifles and competition firearms and can be used sportingly. 

We don’t need to categorize the AR-15 as a sporting rifle, a hunting rifle, a defensive rifle, or an assault rifle. We don’t need these silly terms because we already know what an AR-15 is. It’s a semi-automatic rifle. Just call it that. By simply calling it exactly what it is, we are being honest and succinct. Keeping the conversation focused on semi-auto rifles refocuses the argument for the average person. We are calling them out and showing the world their plans involve very common rifles. 

They can use the term assault rifle, and the defenders of liberty can use the term semi-auto rifle. We can take charge of the argument and honestly point out the fact that what the anti-gun crowd is trying to do is ban semi-auto rifles, the most common type of rifle. That extends to handguns, too, not just rifles. However, my argument is against the term modern sporting rifle, and no one ever called handguns modern sporting handguns. 

Winning With Words 

Using the term semi-automatic instead of modern sporting rifle keeps the argument focused. When we use the term modern sporting rifle, the other side can argue we are being amorphous and trying to somehow divert the conversation. It also implies some odd shame in owning an AR-15 or similar rifle. If we use the proper term, semi-auto rifle, we take one argument out of their sails. We also maintain the high ground and are simply being honest. 

If their argument is, well, we aren’t banning semi-auto rifles. We are banning assault rifles. It all comes back to what’s an assault rifle. Please define the term for us. If they can’t define the term, they can’t even tell you what they are trying to do. It exposes ignorance and dishonesty. 

Using the term semi-auto rifle or semi-auto handgun can be more valuable than you likely expect. It’s the proper term, solidifies our argument, and allows us to maintain a certain degree of honesty. 

Plus, to quote my 12-year-old, modern sporting rifle ‘sounds pretty cringe’. 

The Type 63 – An Odd Assault Rifle

Do you see the announcement of the Antimatter Scopeswitch? It seems pretty neat and well thought out. It’s impressive, and what was equally impressive was how fast Chinese copies were already being made. China is great at ripping off intellectual property and crapping out bad replicas and copies. It’s just what they do. In the late 1950s, they did that with a little-known assault rifle known as the Type 63. 

At this period, they were wielding the Type 56 assault rifle, which was an AK clone. They also had the Type 56 Carbine, which was an SKS clone. Up until the late 1950s, the Chinese and Soviets were buddies and shared weaponry and technology. In the late 1950s, there was an ideological split, and the Soviets were too keen on sharing tech and experience. 

At the same time, the Chinese wanted to extend the effective range of their soldiers and arm them with a more accurate rifle. Plus, using two different rifles meant logistic pain. The differences between the SKS and AK are many, and they require different training, different parts, and even different web gear. 

With all things equal, the SKS tends to be more accurate than the AK. The AK has a shorter sight radius and a clunkier long-stroke gas piston, and the SKS tended to be more rigid and ultimately more accurate. However, the SKS used a fixed magazine, was semi-auto only, and was fed with 10 round stripper clips. The AK offered removable magazines and selective fire. So the Chinese decided to form an unholy union of AK and SKS to form the Type 63. 

Enter the Type 63 

At first glance, the Type 63 looks like an SKS with a longer magazine. Since Tapco existed, we’ve seen that before. We’ve also seen Chinese SKS imports with the ability to take AK mags. They were commonly touted as the Para SKS. This was different. 

That magazine is also removable. It looks Akish, but it is a proprietary 20-round magazine. AK magazines could be used, but this required modification of the rifle to remove the last round bolt hold open. There are also some who said that caused feeding issues. The magazine could also be fed with stripper clips through the top if necessary. 

The Type 63 did offer selective fire capability with a selector placed above the trigger guard. The Chinese military used a pretty basic and well-known tactic of fire and maneuver. The rifle would be fired in semi-auto until forces closed the distance and engaged in close-quarters battle. Then the rifle could be swapped to full auto when necessary. 

The Type 63 wanted to mix the accuracy of the SKS with the selective fire and removable magazine capabilities of the AK series. They also blended some of the integral features of both the AK and SKS. The gun used the short-stroke gas piston system of the SKS but used the rotary bolt from the AK series. Finding deeper details on the internals is tough, but it’s been described as complicated. 

Initial evaluations proved that the rifle was durable, reliable, and accurate. The Type 63 was adopted and issued by China in 1968. They also exported guns to Vietnam during the war, Albania, and even Afghanistan to fight the Soviets. 

The End of the Type 63 

While initial evaluation praised the rifle, it met some snags in production. They did move from a milled to a stamped receiver. There were reportedly quality assurance issues with the gun, and it suffered from some reliability problems when it reached full production. In fact, the lifespan of the rifle went from 15,000 rounds to 10,000 rounds by the time it was issued. 

Eventually, the concept fell apart as modern assault rifles entered service. The Vietnam War showed the lighter, more modern rifle was king. They dropped the Type 63 and picked up the Tpe 56 AK assault rifle and later the Type 81. The Chinese did export some SKS models marked Type 63, but they were semi-auto only and used detachable magazines. However, they were just standard SKS rifles with thumbhole stocks and detachable mags. 

The Type 63 is a neat idea and one last chance for the traditional wood-stocked rifle to get some action. 

Any Time, Any Rifle

Author's IWI Galil ACE Gen2 in 5.56 NATO

The old saw goes, ‘Beware the man with only one gun.’

It’s a phrase that harkens back to a simple time of classic gunfighters who, if they carried something that worked, they stopped messing with it. Simple 6-guns, bolt or lever action rifles, a pump shotgun. Even in the age of evolving auto-loaders it was generally one and done, you carried your issued piece and it worked well enough.

However this is 2023, my perspective on the situation has evolved beyond that quaint saying. I’ve chosen to embrace diversity, if you will. It is certainly a necessity to be proficient with the handgun or rifle you carry, it is your issued equipment and likely to be in your hand, or as close to it as feasible, when you need it. That is its purpose. It is the firearm you will grab to do the job you’ve been entrusted with.

From an an expanded standpoint, outside the additional sworn duties of a service member or law enforcement, the everyday carry is another item that should absolutely be familiar in your hands. This now also applies to we civilian defenders who do not have civil duty as well as those with duty. As proficient as you are at driving your car, at doing your job, at engaging in your favored hobby, you should be as competent with the firearm and its handling to protect yourself.

Thinking beyond the normally abnormal – your gun is out of reach.

A gunfight or a simple DGU is a rare enough event. But what if the gun you have in the fight isn’t your preferred gun? What if that specialty AR with its top of the line optic suite and gucci trigger is safely ensconced in your house? What if you are sitting with an out of the crate WASR and a web sling because you’re at your friend’s place or with the in-laws? What if you just snatched a stolen patrol rifle from a thief who smashed it out of a cop car?

In short, what if it isn’t your rifle at all?

RD NATO, excellent rifle. Not very useful if an AK is a foreign concept to you though.

The ‘man with one gun’ implies a specialist. But it also implies near universal access to the firearm you specialize in, which is truer and easier for a law enforcement type in their own space. It does not account well for the modern items of air travel, variable firearms regulations, and most of the very real world social situations we must navigate. Being able to fight with something you pick up locally is a greater assurance of success, and if the gun doesn’t need to be an 18″ gas tuned, LPVO with offset dot, silent buffer, 17.7″ handguard clad race gun, then all to the better when you grab the whatever-is-available MK1

I’m not implying everyone has a tricked out competition rig as their rifle at home. I am saying we like what we like, and that we tend to get comfortable and complacent with that gun and the ancillaries we selected. That makes us naturally suspicious and uncomfortable with other gear, it isn’t comfortable. That will get in our way if that other gear is all we have at our disposal. If I travel far out of state and don’t want to check and risk firearms in the not-so-secure shipping and handling that airports sometimes represent, then I can ask a friend to have stuff ready for me at the destination instead. I find that far easier to manage when the option exists. Outside that scenario travel in general is easier when we are not required to manage firearms.

Learning how to run the rifles you don’t know will make picking up local that much easier. It will make it a viable option. In addition, it will make you a better and more rounded shooter. It forces the fundamentals you know within the platform you prefer to reconform to fit a new mold.

Agnostic Fundamentals

The AK or the Steyr AUG are dramatically different when compared against each other, or the AR-15, but as autoloading rifles they are all in the same fundamentals group.

Supporting a rifle and managing a trigger do not change as principles, but the way to support an X95 or an AUG are physically different than an AR or SCAR. Placement of the hands, where to support, how the rifle balances, and the delivery of recoil to the shooter are all going to feel different.

The trigger in an AUG is heavy straight pull (actually push) transfer bar where the X95 has a trigger pin like many other carbines. Add into the mix all the aftermarket options and you cannot easily predict how any trigger at random will feel, but you can know how to manage it regardless. A few dry presses should suffice if you have the time. If you don’t, don’t worry about it. Get to shooting.

Lean outside your preferences

The first formal course I took outside uniformed service was on the MP5, it was also a handgun course and my experience there had been up to that point… state CCW curriculum.

A carbine, an old one too, I knew next to nothing about that Die Hard didn’t teach me and a handgun curriculum pushing harder and further than anything I had shot or taught in a 2 to 3 hour period.

I. Learned.

The things I learned about managing a new gun came back to improve my M16/M4 work too. I had 10 years on the AR at that point, but the NCOs of various competencies and limited structured range time had ingrained some goofy habits. Remember ‘The Groucho’ walk/stance? Pepperidge Farms remembers. The formal training on the MP5 (and I will admit a fixation on watching Art of the Tactical Carbine) helped break the bad habits and improve my efficiencies on all the guns.

Then I learned another. Then another after that. I borrowed weird guns from friends who had them to see what they did. I figured them out. I have my preferences, we all will, but making what you have at the time work could be as crucial to your safety as knowing the gun that you bought. They could be different. Be ready for what’s at hand with what is on hand.

Fifth Circuit Holds That Use or Possession of an Intoxicant Does Not Remove Your Rights

Marijuana legalization and its removal from Title I controlled substances is continuing to creep forward as politicos and industries with something to lose in the fight figure out how to lose the least. The propaganda campaign of fear, lies, and slander, all targeted to prey on demographic prejudices and give both more power to government and protect the paper paper of all groups is crumbling. Even the momentum of habit where the drug has been illegal so long it was just assumed to be the correct idea is failing, because it never ever left circulation. Like Prohibition, it was a bad idea to begin with.

Now another federal court decision pushes the pieces one step closer to a checkmate on treating marijuana like the rather mundane intoxicant that it is with the don’t drive or operate heavy machinery disclaimers. Its possession or use does not invalidate your constitutional rights.

From The FPC,

NEW ORLEANS, LA (August 10, 2023) – Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) and FPC Action Foundation (FPCAF) made the following statement regarding yesterday’s Opinion in the Fifth Circuit case United States v. Daniels:

In 2022, Patrick Daniels was convicted in federal court for possessing a firearm while being an “unlawful user” of marijuana, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3). Because of that conviction, he was forever banned from possessing firearms, a fundamental right protected by the Second Amendment. Yesterday, a Fifth Circuit panel held that ban unconstitutional as applied to Mr. Daniels.

“In short, our history and tradition may support some limits on an intoxicated person’s right to carry a weapon, but it does not justify disarming a sober citizen based exclusively on his past drug usage,” wrote Judge Jerry E. Smith in the court’s opinion. “Nor do more generalized traditions of disarming dangerous persons support this restriction on nonviolent drug users. As applied to Daniels, then, § 922(g)(3) violates the Second Amendment. We reverse the judgment of conviction and render a dismissal of the indictment.”

FPC and FPCAF filed an amicus brief in this case, urging the result that the court reached. The court cited the amicus brief in its opinion, as well as two law review articles by FPCAF’s Director of Constitutional Studies, Joseph Greenlee. The articles are The Historical Justification for Prohibiting Dangerous Persons from Possessing Arms (Wyoming Law Review, 2020) and Disarming the Dangerous: The American Tradition of Firearm Prohibitions (Drexel Law Review, forthcoming 2023).

“We are pleased by the court’s decision,” said Greenlee, who authored the amicus brief. “As we explained in our brief, there is no tradition of disarming Americans based solely on their use of an intoxicant, and the government failed to prove that marijuana users are especially dangerous. Therefore, as the court held, § 922(g)(3) is inconsistent with America’s tradition of firearm regulation and thus unconstitutional.”

FPC and FPCAF will continue to seek the restoration of natural, fundamental, and enumerated rights for all the People through its leading scholarly and litigation work.

Individuals who would like to join the FPC Grassroots Army and support important pro-rights lawsuits and programs like these can sign up at JoinFPC.org. Individuals and organizations wanting to support charitable efforts in support of the restoration of Second Amendment and other natural rights can also make a tax-deductible donation to the FPC Action Foundation. For more on FPC’s lawsuits and other pro-Second Amendment initiatives, visit FPCLegal.org and follow FPC on InstagramTwitterFacebookYouTube.

Ruger Super Wrangler

While the Wrangler is worth its modest price the Super Wrangler is a more versatile revolver.

I have enjoyed single action revolvers every since my first handgun shot. This was at a young age firing my father’s .22 caliber Herbert Schmidt revolver. As a working gun for many chores from dispatching pests and vermin to hunting small game a .22 caliber revolver a good choice. In a single action revolver with the optional .22 Magnum cylinder things get more interesting. The single action with its relatively heavy frame and rock solid base pin is reliable. A favorite of all time is the Ruger Single Six .22. A price check in early August 2023 found an average price of $699 for the Single Six. While a well made revolver that isn’t chicken feed for the man or woman with obligations. An inexpensive revolver, Ruger’s Wrangler, was at Cheaperthandirt.com for $208.40. The Wrangler doesn’t have adjustable sights or a .22 Magnum cylinder. The Super Wrangler was found at $283.40. What is a Super Wrangler?

Using non ferrous alloy- perfectly well used to a low pressure .22 Long Rifle cartridge- and using stronger metal in certain high stress areas the Wrangler is a trouble free revolver. There is no spare cylinder as .22 Magnum is deemed too hot a loading for use in zinc alloy  frames. Cerakote finish provides good finish and metal protection. The Wrangler’s accuracy potential cannot be realized at all distances when fixed sights are used. The Super Wrangler is a true outdoorsmans revolver while the Wrangler is more of a plinker for recreational use. The Super Wrangler isn’t an expensive revolver but it is more like the Single Six than the Wrangler.

The Super Wrangler may use shot shell, low and high power .22s, .22 Short, Long, and Long rifle loads in one cylinder. With the Magnum cylinder the longer and more powerful Magnum may be used. (The cartridges are dimensionally very different the .22 Magnum isn’t mrely longer. It is dangerous to fire .22 LR in a Magnum cylinder). The .22 Long Rifle is affordable and offers a great deal of utility. By offering a spare cylinder in .22 Magnum the Super Wrangler increases the usefulness and versatility of the revolver. The new cylinders will not fit in older Wrangler revolvers. The steel frame is stronger than the alloy frame of the Wrangler. With a 5.5 inch barrel the Super Wrangler features good velocity and accuracy. The balance and heft of the revolver are very good. Fast shooting and practice for cowboy action shooting is a good choice!

With the Super Wrangler’s adjustable sights to the Super Wrangler may be properly sighted in for a wide variety of loads and the revolver is accurate to at least 25 yards. The grips are inexpensive checkered plastic grips. The Super Wrangler features transfer bar ignition. When the hammer is at rest a bar between the hammer and firing pin prevents the hammer from moving forward to strike the firing pin. As the hammer is cocked the transfer bar moves into place and as the hammer falls the transfer bar is smacked by the hammer and fires the cartridge under the hammer. This is a safe and reliable system. The Wrangler and Super Wrangler as well as all modern Ruger revolvers may be safely carried fully loaded. To load the revolver open the loading gate and rotate the cylinder as you load one round at a time. To eject spent cartridges the chamber is lined up with the ejector rod and the rod is pressed to eject the cartridge. The trigger action is smooth and crisp. The trigger breaks at  3.5 pounds compression. I rounded up a good mix of .22 Long Rifle and .22 Magnum ammunition. I was distracted a bit by plinking and fun shooting at range debris on the 50 and 100 yard line. This is a fun gun! I settled down and fired accuracy results and chronographed a few loads. 

A variety of .22 Magnum ammunition proved reliable and accurate in the Super Wrangler.

Accuracy testing was undertaken at 50 feet firing from an MTM Caseguard K Zone firing rest.  

LoadVelocity5 shot group
.22 Long Rifle Remington Thunderbolt980 fps1.4 in.
CCI Mini Mag .22 Magnum 1001 fps1.5 in.
CCI MaxiMag hollowpoint 1340 fps1.1 in.
CCI MaxiMagn Solid nose1360 fps1.3 in.
Federal Punch 45 grain1255 fps1.2 in.

For versatility value and fun shooting the Super Wrangler is a fine modern revolver.

Weight 37.0 ounces
Length: 11 in.
Barrel Length: 5.5 in.

How to Make Competition Shooting Easier For Newbs

I’ve recently gotten into shooting local competition matches. These have varied quite a bit with some Steel Challenge, Action Steel, Skeet, Bowling pin shooting, and even a few other nonstandard competitions. I’m still very much a beginner in this field, but it’s been a ton of fun. I’ve even seen my skills improve quite nicely. While I’m very much a beginner in the world of competition, I know a thing or two about shooting in general. With that in mind, I was still often left confused by the advertisements and Practiscore pages for certain shoots. 

I would often write the match organizer to receive a little more information, and most replied. Knowing a thing or two about the gun world made it a little easier for me, but I imagine that people who don’t live and breathe this stuff would often be left clueless, maybe frustrated, and most certainly less likely to compete and shoot. One of the great things about the gun world is that it’s widely accepted that everyone’s a student, and even a new student can have something to add to the conversation. 

As a new student of competition, I can’t tell you how to be a better shooter or how to reach GM, but I think I can get some advice to match organizers on how to make your matches more attractive to new shooters or even experienced shooters looking to get into the competition realm. 

Post A Suggested Equipment List 

This one has been my bain for me entering into different competition shoots. Some have become easy to predict, but when I started, I had no idea what I’d need. I have plenty of guns, ammo, holsters, etc., but what did I need for the match? Did I need belt-mounted mag pouches? Did I need a sling? 

On my first PCC match, I didn’t bring a chamber flag because it was never listed, and I had no idea if I’d need one. A short equipment list would be quite handy to have and would make it much easier to plan and prepare for the match. This is especially true when it comes to safety gear that might not be standard for range use. 

Do Not Rely on Acronyms 

Again, as an experienced shooter, I know what PCC stands for, but not everyone does. The phrase PCC rifle can be confusing, and I know this because a gentleman showed up to the PCC match with a Mini-30. He didn’t understand what the phrase meant and wasn’t familiar with it. We lost a competitor right at the beginning because of this confusion. 

Acronyms in the gun world are everywhere, and they can be downright confusing. It seems like life would be easier for everyone to explain what the term means or to just avoid using acronyms without an explanation. 

Explain The Skills Required To Shoot the Match 

This is a big one. When a shooter goes to a USPSA match, they typically know what to expect. With that in mind, what happens when they don’t? It might be wise to establish that your match will require shooting on the move, rapid reloading, drawing, etc. This can help new shooters understand the skills needed and what to expect from the match. 

I’ve seen biathlon-style, tactical games like shoot competition posting go in depth for multiple paragraphs on what to expect. It was great, and if I was competing, I’d know exactly what was expected of me. The same goes for my local Steel Challenge shoot, which explains what occurs during the match. This at least prepares folks to find a match that works with their skill level. 

Host a Beginner Oriented Match 

This is probably the best way to get new shooters into competition shooting of any style. Host a beginner-friendly match or even a ‘clinic’ where new shooters and new competition shooters can practice and learn a lot about competition shooting. It would be perfect to have more than the average RSOs and skilled shooters volunteer to teach and educate. 

Heck, if possible, provide the guns for new shooters and set them up from the start to make it stress-free. However, this is harder said than done, which I understand entirely. Still, if you have a small club, it might be a great way to make it bigger. 

Comp Friendly 

Competition shooting can be an intimidating sport to get into. I shoot a lot and take classes on occasion, and I was still a bit stressed at my first match. I even got some things wrong and forgot a thing or two. With that in mind, here are just a few suggestions from a beginner to make these competitions a little friendlier. 

The Dual Pistol Grip Shotgun – PGO X2

We all know the pistol grip only shotgun is a bit contentious as a defensive weapon. It’s small and powerful but tough to control. The Shockwave and TAC-14, with their respective KAK grips, make things a little comfier but still challenging to control. What if we took the pistol grips on a pistol grip only gun and doubled them? What happens, then? Replace the rear and front grips of a pump shotgun with pistol grips and just see what happens. That gave birth to the dual pistol grip only shotgun.

The Dual Pistol Grip Shotgun

I have this PDF collection of all these old Soldier of Fortune magazines, and one of my favorite parts is all these old gun ads. Finding products, I’ve never heard of or seen. Seeing crazy guns that never made it out of print. Plus, seeing the occasional Choate ad that brings us back to the world of tactical shotguns.

One of my favorites is this monstrosity of a shotgun with a front and rear grip and a flashlight mounted to the top as a quasi-aiming device. It’s glorious in that way that only guns from the 1870s and 1980s can be. With this in mind, I used Choate to put together my dual pistol grip shotgun.

Specifically, a Choate rear and front grip, and I attached them to a Winchester 1300 Defender for my experiment. Vertical grips might not be the rage these days, but they were quite popular on short, often heavier-than-normal firearms. They helped stabilize the weapon, and the idea was that they could help you resist muzzle rise. For me, I want to use the vertical and rear grip to create tension using the Push/Pull method of recoil reduction.

Maybe the Dual Pistol Grip shotgun can give the PGO a new, more reputable name.

At the Range

I practiced getting a nice, tight push/pull in play. With the technique, as I understand it, the front hand is doing most of the work. It’s a 60/40 split, if you will. I practiced getting a good tight grip and keeping the gun up and in play. I worked the action and practiced getting into and releasing the tension. It felt good, easy to hold, and nice and tight.

I went full bore off the bat and loaded up some full-powered buckshot in the gun. I pointed and aimed every shot and worked from ten yards on B8 targets. The first shot was surprisingly painful to that front wrist that was doing all the work. My rear wrist felt nothing, and the front absorbed it all.

Big oof, but my shot was on target, and I had the next round cycled in just a flick of the wrist. I launched another, even with the protest of my wrist, and landed the nine pellets in the B8 once more. I moved to some lighter-loaded, reduced recoil buckshot rounds, and my wrist appreciated it.

Flying through rounds using a tight push-pull technique was easy and I launched multiple rounds into multiple targets with decent accuracy. Surprisingly so. The gun doesn’t get away from you, and the vertical grip adds a real level of control over the gun. I could fire two rounds on two targets in a hair over two seconds and keep it in the black of a B8 at ten yards.

Is the Dual Pistol Grip Worth It?

If your choice is between a rear vertical pistol grip only gun and a dual vertical pistol grip, then go dual. I would still choose a Shockwave configuration over this setup. Maybe I should add a vertical grip to a Shockwave? Beyond that, I would choose a stocked shotgun over any of them. With a stocked shotgun, I could put two rounds into two targets in well under two seconds. It’s just much easier to control and much faster.

Still, the dual pistol grip works better than a single pistol grip gun.

SCOTUS Reinstates Frame/Receiver ‘Ghost Gun’ Rule While Case Proceeds

Bruen decision echoes through country
Photo Credit: AP Photo/Patrick Semansky

The US Circuit Court had previously leveled a stay against the frame/receiver rule put out by the ATF but the US Supreme Court has put the rule back into effect while the case moves forward after an appeal by the Biden DoJ.

“Americans across the country will be safer thanks to the Supreme Court’s decision today to keep ATF’s life-saving ghost guns rule in effect while the appeals process plays out,” said John Feinblatt, president of the group Everytown for Gun Safety.

That is a dubious claim, even as the popularity of P80 and other 80% kits skyrocketed and their being found at criminal scenes or taken into law enforcement custody increased they still represented a mere fraction of the criminally related firearms made by, and serialized by, Glock alone.

The rule relates to PMFs, Privately Made Firearms, and their legal existence without a serial number. Gun control groups continue to trumpet the ‘untraceable’ nature of guns without a number carved into it like its magical crime GPS, but the reality is far more mundane with tracking to the last commercial point of sale giving LE very little useful data that they need for prosecution of the crime associated with weapon.

The case proceeds as the rule once again remains enforceable from its initial stay in July.

This is not unexpected in a case like this, nor is it indicative of the rule being finally vacated or remain permanently either.