Advertisement

How Carrying a Gun Makes You Safer, Even When Not Carrying a Gun

The below article has been submitted by one of our followers. Keith is a NRA Certified Instructor and RO. We greatly appreciate the time he has taken to write this article. Keith really hits some great point on how the act of preparation is a tool in itself. Read the article below and share your thoughts on our Facebook page.

For those of us in the defensive carry community, we understand there are currently limitations on the areas we can legally carry a firearm, concealed or open. These ‘Pistol Free Zones’ are a contentious issue politically and are in various states of repeal or enactment depending on who is pushing what legislation.

We know as a community that Pistol Free Zones don’t work. We know there is a segment of the population that cannot be convinced of this, which is why PFZ’s came to be in the first place, and as a result a false sense of security comes from them. Both public and private entities make it known if they do not want firearms around. I avoid giving them my business when possible.

I acknowledge, as you most likely do, that I cannot entirely avoid areas where I legally cannot carry a firearm, and that to ignore the law and carry anyway would invite potentially harsh legal consequences.

So I disarm, leaving my carry gun in my car or at home, out of reach should the need arise. The risk to me likely hasn’t gone up all that much, but the reality is I have been legislated out of an appreciable response should my life or someone else’s be threatened. I don’t like it, but such is life, I need to conduct my business.

Looking at this from a problem solving perspective however, I am still better off than those who do not regularly carry. We are dedicated firearm carrying members of society. This means that our goal of personal safety hasn’t changed, just the tools available to achieve that goal have become more limited.
Limited, not eliminated…

What is left in your tool box? Why are you still safer than the average person even without your gun?

Tool Number 1: Situational Awareness

Carrying a gun is a small part of your emergency reaction response, at least it should be. The single most important thing you are constantly doing is assessing your situation ‘what is going on around me?’ This is providing you the information needed to react to any threat or emergency.
We don’t stop this when we have to leave our gun behind. If you’re anything like me you will actually increase your awareness because our options have now been handicapped. Despite not having the gun we have the ability to still look at what is going on and take queues from it.

Tool Number 2: Your Plan

Like our heightened awareness level, our formulating a plan of response to any emergency likely kicks up a notch when not carrying. Being forced to remove a defensive option will make you re-evaluate your remaining options, draw up better mental plans, allowing us to act instead of re-act. We refine the details like asking yourself where you pocket knife is, where are the exits, are there barriers or concealment nearby. Ladies, when you have to leave the gun behind I bet you think about just how heavy your purse is, quite the bludgeon. Walking into a PFZ we need to go down that inventory list, just in case.
I can assure you this is a good exercise mentally. Evaluating and reassessing your plan to react to a situation strengthens the mental readiness of your prepared options, gun or no gun. In the heat of the moment the “fog of war’ can kill our mental faculties, adrenaline has dumped us into our reactionary state. Our preparedness can make the difference and allow us and our loved ones to escape safely by keeping us ready for that adrenaline fueled emergency mode.

Tool Number 3: The ‘Intangibles’

This tool isn’t so much about what you gain when you aren’t carrying a firearm. It is about the other safety conscious training that is already a likely part of your make up. It’s a shot in the dark (pun intended) but I would place good odds on a Concealed Pistol

Permit/License not being your only safety oriented certification. Likely, you have taken classes that grant First Aid Certificates, Safety Awareness Certificates or Loss Prevention. You and the population around you benefit from this increased readiness.

CPL holders are often willfully prepared individuals and this doesn’t extend just to emergencies involving violence. It ups your readiness for ANY emergency. You have likely integrated plans for natural disasters, medical emergencies, outages, etc. at home already. You are also, very likely, more consciously aware and in practice with your place of work’s emergency procedures.

As a safety minded individual, who carries a firearm, preparation and training tend to stand out more in our minds. They fit with our prepared and reactionary mindset, we quietly embrace this training and awareness as we go about our more mundane day to day activities knowing that if an emergency arises, we have a plan.

In conclusion, the fact that you carry a firearm for personal protection indicates a safety conscious mindset. This mindset does not go away when you go somewhere where you cannot carry that firearm.
You are safer because you carry a firearm, even when you can’t.

BIO:

Keith R Finch
NRA Certified Instructor
NRA Certified Chief Range Safety Officer
Keith is a US Marine and served 6 years, he left active service as a Corporal from the infantry. He was certified as an NRA instructor on December 31 2009, and has been teaching classes in the Kalamazoo MI area, weekly now, with Viper Security (vipermi.com)
Keith became an instructor to give his marines an edge shooting, recognizing the Marine Corps didn’t know everything, and served as a company level instructor in tandem with his other roles. His love of the shooting community grew as he taught with Viper and the Marines, he now devotes his available time to learning and sharing the best available information for all aspects of the shooting community… occasionally interrupted by the need to chase after venison in November

Keith R Finch NRA Certified Instructor NRA Certified Chief Range Safety Officer
Keith R Finch
NRA Certified Instructor
NRA Certified Chief Range Safety Officer

Sig Sauer P938 Review Follow up

It has now been several months since I purchased the sig p938. You can see our original review with technical specs and our initial thoughts here. 

Originally we purchased a P938 Extreme with Hogue G-10 grips for Mrs. Shooter, because of her small hands and fingers that required a short Single Action Only trigger. After taking her CPL course and carrying the gun it is still her one and only favorite weapon.

Those that know me, know that I am not one to be outdone. As such after shooting her gun several times the itch for my own sig P938 grew and grew. In the height of the panic I was able to sell my Ruger LC9 at a very nice profit and use that to cover most of the cost of a P938.

My wife made it very clear that I was not going to get an Extreme and that I needed to pick another finish if I wanted the Sig P938. Luck would have it that a Sig P938 Nightmare became available so I grabbed it up at a great price. At the time I carried my Glock 27 on a daily basis and only wanted to replace the Ruger LC9 that had been my dress up pocket pistol. The idea of  replacing my Glock 27 in .40 caliber with a 9mm that had less rounds was not a consideration at all.

the P938 carried as a pocket pistol for charity events when needing to wear a suit or tuxedo worked perfectly. In the coming months I carried the P938 any place my clothing would not allow me to carry a larger pistol.

Then Fathers day came and my world was turned upside down. My wife in a gesture of unfathomable kindness and understanding purchased a Crossbreed Mini Tick holster for me that was made for the P938.  Let me explain something about Mrs. Shooter, she has a CPL and will carry, but is not an enthusiast like I am. More importantly she does not want anyone to know I am carrying. As such while she appreciates me being prepared and armed she does not want to know or have anyone around me be able to see a print.

As a way to make me happy and to reduce printing she knew I needed a IWB holster.  As such she went out and found Crossbreed and picked up a Mini Tuck to make us both happy. We will be doing a full review on the Mini Tuck shortly but lets just say that this holster was so much more comfortable then my Old Faithful Holster that it blew my mind.

I started using the Crossbreed with the P938 for any family events and anytime the kids were around. Slowly I started using it when an increased level of cover was not needed, like going out to get lunch or other solo events. Now based on the thin slide on the Sig and the comfort of the Crossbreed holster it has transitioned to my EDC. I still wear my G27 when going into Detroit or other “risky” places but in my everyday environment I have found the P938 to be a great balance of form and function. Offering me a comfortable level of confidence especially if carrying a spare mag without the size, weight and print that comes with some of my larger weapons.

The gun has been to the range now several time with almost 800 rounds through it. I have fired +P self defense rounds with no issues and have yet to find a cartridge that causes this gun to hiccup. The only issue I have had with the gun is the extremely rough texture of the P938 Nightmare did really rough up my side. I have been lucky enough to convince my wife to swap pistols with me so that I can carry the Extreme which is much more comfortable to wear. If you always have an undershirt on then you are likely not going to be affected by this.

We will continue to update you as Mrs. Shooter and I get more experience with the Sig Sauer P938 but for now I would place this gun on the must have list.

We have also done some reviews that are related to P938 owners. Please check out these other interesting articles:
SnagMag and the p938 magazine
SigSauer TacOps 1911

Sig Sauer P938 Review

I have to say this gun is an absolute work of art. Think baby 1911 in 9mm. This is a true pocket pistol that you can actually feel comfortable carrying and shooting.

It started going back to Oct of 2012. If an effort to garner support at home for my time at the range an attempt was made to encourage my wife to shoot. Those of you who know me personally will know my wife is a very petite woman. She stands 5ft even and under 100 lbs. She has some of the tiniest hands I have ever seen on an adult. She has shied away from shooting due to most pistols being to large for her to hold and due to her fear of the recoil.

She has tried my Glock and it is so large that she can not even reach the trigger. The LC9 she can grip but the trigger is so far forward that she is unable to pull it. So we went to the Novi Gunshow to see what we could find for her. Now keep in mind my wife knows nothing about guns but everything about expensive taste. She tried out 30 or so guns that day never once looking at the price. The entire goal was for fit and feel so she could be comfortable.

We come across a dealer I have used many times since now out of Okemos who is happy to show her the P238 and P938 in various styles. For those of you who do not know they come in the following configurations:


P938 Blackwood

P938 Extreme

P938 Rosewood

P938 Equinox

P938 Black Rubber Grip

P938 Nightmare

P938 AG

P938 SAS

After picking up the p938 Equinox she went from a person who tolerated my expensive hobby to someone who was generally interested in shooting. The fit was perfect even without the pinky extension her hand fit on the gun. The trigger had been firm close and easy to pull for her short fingers. The grip was comfortable and adequately stylish. We had a winner. The gun cost $680 which after the panic was a steel but when compared to my $325 LC9 was a bit of a hard pill to swallow. In the interest of her defense and my continued enjoyment on the line we purchased it. She has since taken her CPL class using this weapon and enjoys it greatly.

Fast forward to January. After getting fed up with the trigger on the LC9 I take her P938 to the range with some friends. I do not shoot well with a hammer fired DOA handgun. The issue is me and not the gun I know and practice will help but in a Life or Death situation I want my striker fired Glock or a solid SA SRT trigger. I was so impressed with the trigger of the p938 it was a clean crisp with a short reset and light pull compared to the other pocket pistols I have fired. For a gun so small I expected a bit more recoil but it was very easy to get back on target and fire follow up shots. Considering I had never fired this pistol and the 2.25 inch barrel size I was shocked when the groupings on my targets had been so tight. I am no marksman so I’m not going to share but it is sufficient to say that I practiced with the LC9 for months and my first 6 shots with the p938 had better groupings then any I had done on my LC9 ever.

I knew I had to have one. Unfortunately these guns had been hard to come by before the panic. After they had been nearly impossible. NY was getting them due to the new mag limits so places like MI found them hard to find. I went on GunBroker to see if I would have any luck there. I found several selling over $900 all in the same finish as my wife’s. Since we share a safe this would not work and I would have to get another configuration. After a few weeks of hunting around I was finally able to procure the Nightmare for $685 which came out to be closer to $750 after CC fee’s, shipping and local FFL cost.

Using the same Galco pocket holster I had for the LC9 I have been able to carry this gun very easily concealed in a pocket with limited to no printing. I am using the extended 7rd magazine with the pinky extension due to my full sized hands. As a 6ft tall man there is no issue with holding this gun if you use the pinky extension. Two of my friends are able to shoot it comfortably without the extension so try it for yourself and see. Even with the extension concealment is not an issue.

The trigger out of the box was a bit gritty and tight. There has been complaints about issues with the first model extractors. Supposedly these issues had been corrected by Oct of 2012 and I have not seen them in my P938 Nightmare. After cleaning degreasing the weapon and then properly lubricating it I began to work the trigger. Using  a snap cap and firing the gun about 150 times the grittiness in the trigger was gone and it had a very nice smooth pull.

A common complaint for this gun is the serrated trigger and the sharp tip of the plastic trigger. In a self defense situation it won’t be an issue but after putting a few hundred rounds downrange without gloves most people report a sore finger and some have even had blisters. There is 2 ways to resolve this. The first is SS replacement triggers. These are often preferred by high end shooter over the plastic trigger that is shipped with the P938. You can use the same exact trigger replacements as those designed for the P238 as they have been around longer and offer more options. The second is what I did and that is to take a Dremmel tool and a very fine sanding wheel and sand down the serration’s and sharp trigger tip. Since this is plastic it is very easy to do and will result in a very comfortable trigger that you can mold to your shooting style. The plastic is black all the way through so sanding this down will not leave you with a 2 tone trigger. There are several videos on YouTube about this if you are interested.

In short this is my new ultra concealment EDC for times when carrying my Glock is not a viable option. It gets a lot of use and has handled the wear well. The trigger keeps getting better as does my accuracy. The Sig Sites are some of the best night sites I have ever had the privilege of using. All in all it was worth every penny IMHO.

Sig P938 Nightmare Image

We have added an update to this review after both I and Mrs. Shooter have transitioned to the Sig P938 as our primary EDC. Please follow this link to find out more. 

Modular Lightweight Load Carrying Equipment (MOLLE) What is it?

Modular Lightweight Load Carrying Equipment (MOLLE, pronounced Molly) is an Army and Marine Corps item that replaces the aging ALICE (All-purpose, Lightweight, Individual Carrying Equipment) pack, introduced in 1974, and the Integrated Individual Fighting System, introduced in 1988.

Origin of the MOLLE Pack

MOLLE began when the Department of Defense started looking to replace the ALICE pack in 1994. Soldiers and Marines took a survey in 1996 resulting in a project to design a load-carrying system that’s modular, durable and comfortable, requirements that led to the MOLLE.

Pack, Assault, MOLLE NSN 8465-01-513-4083
Pack, Assault, MOLLE NSN 8465-01-513-4083

The U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, located at Natick, MA assisted with biomechanical studies to find the most efficient way to carry loads and investigated the interaction between different load-carriage equipment and human performance. The Center for Military Biomechanics Research (CMBR) launched a comparison between a commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) internal frame pack and the standard ALICE which revealed reduced energy cost and lower postural deviations when carrying a 75 lb. load in the COTS pack. The lower energy cost and preferred walking posture associated with the commercial pack were attributed to its volume configuration and related load center of mass location. The taller, narrower commercial pack afforded a more optimal load center of mass placement on the body compared to the ALICE.

Although the internal frame COTS pack was rejected as a replacement for the ALICE pack due, in part, to its excessive heat retention, a similar volume configuration was incorporated into the design of the Modular Lightweight Load Carrying Equipment (MOLLE) pack. Other biomechanically advantageous characteristics, such as a load-distributing waist belt, were also used in the MOLLE design.

MOLLE prototypes were developed at the U.S. Army Soldier Systems Center (Natick, MA). New technology was used for the MOLLE’s frame, which was first built as a model in Natick’s Rapid Prototyping Facility. Instead of the tubular aluminum used with the ALICE, a new anatomically-contoured frame made with plastic originally used in automobile bumpers has dramatically increased durability, functioning in temperatures ranging from -40 to 120 degrees F.

The MOLLE prototype was evaluated by the CMBR, and as a result of its demonstrated superior performance characteristics, the MOLLE pack has been accepted as the replacement for the ALICE pack as the standard individual load-carrying equipment for the Army and Marine Corps. Soldiers from the 25th Infantry Division in Hawaii tested the MOLLE for six months, and it was well-received even with loads exceeding 120 pounds. The Army also conducted extensive testing on the MOLLE prototype using female soldiers. Based on the results of this test, the size of the MOLLE was reduced slightly to meet the needs of male and female soldiers.

Specialty Defense Inc. in Dunmore, PA got the first contract to manufacture 216,000 MOLLE systems for the entire Marine Corps and initial Army fielding, beginning in October 2001. In February 2002 an additional 1,200 MOLLE backpack frames were procured for the Marine Expeditionary Unit deploying to Afghanistan.

MOLLE equipment did not see widespread issue until 2003, then focused mostly on deployments to Afghanistan with limited use in Iraq. Originally MOLLE was produced in woodland camouflage, followed by desert camouflage in 2004 and finally, beginning in 2006, Universal Camouflage pattern was made the standard.

MOLLE Description

MOLLE USMC

MOLLE is a fully integrated, modular load bearing system consisting of a load bearing vest with butt pack, main ruck with sustainment pouches and sleeping bag compartment attached to an external frame. There is also a patrol pack, which can be used separately or combined with the main ruck for added load carrying capability. MOLLE can be configured in several different variations to fit the load handling needs of the mission. The load-bearing vest is always worn and holds pockets for magazines and hand grenades. A connecting device on the vest is designed so that the external frame of the main ruck attaches to the waist belt of the vest to transfer the load from the shoulders and back to the hips where it can be carried much easier with less fatigue.

The nylon mesh vest has removable pockets to accommodate different carrying needs and is one of the main components of the MOLLE system. The different variations of the load-bearing vest are designed for each member of a squad. These configurations include a rifleman, pistol, squad automatic weapon, grenadier, and corpsman configuration.

MOLLE also advances load-carrying ability with its new suspension system. Heavily-padded shoulder straps and waist belt are adjustable for varying torso lengths, eliminating the two sizes of ALICE. More weight is distributed at the shoulders and hips, and during a prolonged road march, soldiers can shift the weight to where it feels more comfortable.

Soldiers with MOLLE

The Fighting Load Carrier (FLC) replaces the Load Bearing Equipment (LBE) web belt and suspenders of the ALICE. FLC significantly increases the amount of ammunition soldiers can carry, and weight is evenly distributed across the torso. The vest has no metal clips or hooks that can be awkward and dig into the skin, and has an H-harness in back to minimize heat buildup. It’s adjustable to all sizes, and because the vest sits high, soldiers can fasten the MOLLE frame waist belt underneath the FLC to distribute some of the load to the hips. Three flap pockets on the FLC each hold two 30-round magazines, two grenade pockets and two canteen pouches.

The rucksack has a front pocket to hold a claymore antipersonnel mine. Inside is a bandolier with a capacity for six 30-round magazines and a removable tactical radio pocket. A detachable sustainment pouch on each side is big enough to hold a Meal, Ready-to-Eat (MRE) with room to spare, and underneath the rucksack, a sleeping bag compartment was designed to hold the Army’s new modular sleeping bag.

All of the larger pouches of MOLLE, such as the outside rucksack pouches, have D-rings for carrying with a sling and use plastic see-through identification windows so soldiers don’t have to marker or tape their name onto the MOLLE’s camouflaged, urethane-coated nylon fabric. Each system comes with two 6-foot lashing straps for carrying large objects, such as a mortar plate or five-gallon containers. If one of the plastic buckles breaks, a repair kit carries a bag of spares for simple replacement.

Every MOLLE comes with a tube-delivered water pouch for on-the-move hydration to supplement the one-quart canteen. The standard issue version is not for use in a chemical or biological agent-contaminated environment, although efforts are ongoing to develop a mobile hydration system for all conditions.

Adapting to the mission will be easier with a detachable pack. The pack holds gear such as extra water, rations and ammunition soldiers would need for 72 hours or less while eliminating other items that might get in the way.

The modular design supports movement to an objective, then dump the big pack, take off the detachable pack and be ready to fight. The side sustainment pouches can be removed from the rucksack and placed on the patrol pack to give the same carrying capacity as the medium ALICE pack.

The innovative MOLLE Pouch Attachment Ladder System (PALS) of interwoven straps has become the standard way to attach small pouches, accessory carriers and other attachments for MOLLE equipment and most other systems developed since MOLLE, such as body armor, load bearing equipment or vests. ALICE clips and other methods have been completely replaced by MOLLE PALS.

MOLLE II Equipment

Field user feedback on the original MOLLE led to modified designs to some of the MOLLE components. With these changes, MOLLE became MOLLE II. Specific changes included:

Eliminated the quick-release frame integrated into the load bearing vest (LBV)
The probe and socket mechanism changed to a quick-release mechanism for frame waist belt, now permanently-mounted to the frame
MOLLE II permanently attached waistbelt comes in one size (Same NSN as the MOLLE size small waistbelt, NSN 8465-01-465-2109)
MOLLE LBV redesigned to eliminate the molded waistbelt, called the MOLLE II Fighting Load Carrier (FLC) (Same NSN as the MOLLE LBV. NSN 8465-01-465-2056)
MOLLE Utility Belt (NSN 8465-01-465-2082) eliminated by building the functionality into the vest
MOLLE butt pack replaced by the MOLLE II waist pack (Same NSN)
MOLLE II Pouch, Canteen Carrier/Utility was introduced (NSN 8465-01-484-0450)
MOLLE 30rd Single Magazine Pocket eliminated (NSN 8465-01-465-2079)
The MOLLE Care and Use Manual is available at the linked page. MOLLE equipment is available from Amazon, and other suppliers.

MOLLE Evolves for the Army and is Replaced by the USMC

Based on user feedback on the original system, the MOLLE requirements were modified to eliminate the need for a quick-release frame that integrates into the load-bearing vest. The change allowed developers to replace the probe and socket mechanism, which caused problems for some soldiers and Marines, with a quick-release mechanism for a more traditional permanently-mounted waist belt on the frame.

In Afghanistan, troops noted that MOLLE zippers were bursting open when the bags were stuffed full. Another defect was that the straps weren’t long enough to be easily adjusted over body armor such as PASGT or Interceptor. MOLLE was changed to provide locking zippers and longer shoulder straps.

The Marine Corps was not satisficed by the evolution of MOLLE and has replaced MOLLE (and the aging ALICE (All-purpose Lightweight Individual Carrying Equipment) with the Improved Load Bearing Equipment (ILBE).

MOLLE Moves into the future with Blue Force Gear

We have highlighted the advanced technology that is being employed by Blue Force Gear.

Helium Whisper 

Ten-Speed

RACKminus and SPLITminus

These new advancements are likely to be future of the MOLLE systems as well as personal defense, hiking, air-soft and tactical operators for the forceable future.

Shop MOLLE gear on Amazon

Ruger LC9 Review

Watch Hickok45’s review of the Ruger LC9 on Youtube. This is the video that made me go out and buy one. Later this month expect to see my first Youtube video which will be a review of this gun.

This is a single stack 6 or 7 round magazine that is perfect for concealed pocket carry.

The safety for many is a nice feature for pocket cary.

The trigger is an exceptionally long pull. This is a nice safety feature but will certainly hurt your ability to group the bullets. Galloway precission makes an adjusted trigger you can find here. This makes a big difference from what I have read and seen though I have not tried it yet. I did buy the guide rod and that made a difference that was worth the investment.

The blue on the actual barrel is garbage in my opinion. It started coming off in the first 50 rounds I shot. I did find in this linked video however a great way to make the barrel look nice by removing the blue that comes off anyways.

If you have this gun please leave a comment and let me know what you think of it. If you have a pocket holster for this please let me know as well since I am looking for a better pocket holster.

Zero your AR-15 Iron Sites

This is a fantastic video for those of you that are new to the AR platform or have not had much experience with setting mechanical zero on a rifle. This will also work for many red dot sites that are commonly used with AR-15’s.

Check out Safe Arms Review on Youtube and be sure to watch this great video on how to best zero your AR-15 .