Advertisement

Sig Sauer P938 Review

I have to say this gun is an absolute work of art. Think baby 1911 in 9mm. This is a true pocket pistol that you can actually feel comfortable carrying and shooting.

It started going back to Oct of 2012. If an effort to garner support at home for my time at the range an attempt was made to encourage my wife to shoot. Those of you who know me personally will know my wife is a very petite woman. She stands 5ft even and under 100 lbs. She has some of the tiniest hands I have ever seen on an adult. She has shied away from shooting due to most pistols being to large for her to hold and due to her fear of the recoil.

She has tried my Glock and it is so large that she can not even reach the trigger. The LC9 she can grip but the trigger is so far forward that she is unable to pull it. So we went to the Novi Gunshow to see what we could find for her. Now keep in mind my wife knows nothing about guns but everything about expensive taste. She tried out 30 or so guns that day never once looking at the price. The entire goal was for fit and feel so she could be comfortable.

We come across a dealer I have used many times since now out of Okemos who is happy to show her the P238 and P938 in various styles. For those of you who do not know they come in the following configurations:


P938 Blackwood

P938 Extreme

P938 Rosewood

P938 Equinox

P938 Black Rubber Grip

P938 Nightmare

P938 AG

P938 SAS

After picking up the p938 Equinox she went from a person who tolerated my expensive hobby to someone who was generally interested in shooting. The fit was perfect even without the pinky extension her hand fit on the gun. The trigger had been firm close and easy to pull for her short fingers. The grip was comfortable and adequately stylish. We had a winner. The gun cost $680 which after the panic was a steel but when compared to my $325 LC9 was a bit of a hard pill to swallow. In the interest of her defense and my continued enjoyment on the line we purchased it. She has since taken her CPL class using this weapon and enjoys it greatly.

Fast forward to January. After getting fed up with the trigger on the LC9 I take her P938 to the range with some friends. I do not shoot well with a hammer fired DOA handgun. The issue is me and not the gun I know and practice will help but in a Life or Death situation I want my striker fired Glock or a solid SA SRT trigger. I was so impressed with the trigger of the p938 it was a clean crisp with a short reset and light pull compared to the other pocket pistols I have fired. For a gun so small I expected a bit more recoil but it was very easy to get back on target and fire follow up shots. Considering I had never fired this pistol and the 2.25 inch barrel size I was shocked when the groupings on my targets had been so tight. I am no marksman so I’m not going to share but it is sufficient to say that I practiced with the LC9 for months and my first 6 shots with the p938 had better groupings then any I had done on my LC9 ever.

I knew I had to have one. Unfortunately these guns had been hard to come by before the panic. After they had been nearly impossible. NY was getting them due to the new mag limits so places like MI found them hard to find. I went on GunBroker to see if I would have any luck there. I found several selling over $900 all in the same finish as my wife’s. Since we share a safe this would not work and I would have to get another configuration. After a few weeks of hunting around I was finally able to procure the Nightmare for $685 which came out to be closer to $750 after CC fee’s, shipping and local FFL cost.

Using the same Galco pocket holster I had for the LC9 I have been able to carry this gun very easily concealed in a pocket with limited to no printing. I am using the extended 7rd magazine with the pinky extension due to my full sized hands. As a 6ft tall man there is no issue with holding this gun if you use the pinky extension. Two of my friends are able to shoot it comfortably without the extension so try it for yourself and see. Even with the extension concealment is not an issue.

The trigger out of the box was a bit gritty and tight. There has been complaints about issues with the first model extractors. Supposedly these issues had been corrected by Oct of 2012 and I have not seen them in my P938 Nightmare. After cleaning degreasing the weapon and then properly lubricating it I began to work the trigger. Using  a snap cap and firing the gun about 150 times the grittiness in the trigger was gone and it had a very nice smooth pull.

A common complaint for this gun is the serrated trigger and the sharp tip of the plastic trigger. In a self defense situation it won’t be an issue but after putting a few hundred rounds downrange without gloves most people report a sore finger and some have even had blisters. There is 2 ways to resolve this. The first is SS replacement triggers. These are often preferred by high end shooter over the plastic trigger that is shipped with the P938. You can use the same exact trigger replacements as those designed for the P238 as they have been around longer and offer more options. The second is what I did and that is to take a Dremmel tool and a very fine sanding wheel and sand down the serration’s and sharp trigger tip. Since this is plastic it is very easy to do and will result in a very comfortable trigger that you can mold to your shooting style. The plastic is black all the way through so sanding this down will not leave you with a 2 tone trigger. There are several videos on YouTube about this if you are interested.

In short this is my new ultra concealment EDC for times when carrying my Glock is not a viable option. It gets a lot of use and has handled the wear well. The trigger keeps getting better as does my accuracy. The Sig Sites are some of the best night sites I have ever had the privilege of using. All in all it was worth every penny IMHO.

Sig P938 Nightmare Image

We have added an update to this review after both I and Mrs. Shooter have transitioned to the Sig P938 as our primary EDC. Please follow this link to find out more. 

Modular Lightweight Load Carrying Equipment (MOLLE) What is it?

Modular Lightweight Load Carrying Equipment (MOLLE, pronounced Molly) is an Army and Marine Corps item that replaces the aging ALICE (All-purpose, Lightweight, Individual Carrying Equipment) pack, introduced in 1974, and the Integrated Individual Fighting System, introduced in 1988.

Origin of the MOLLE Pack

MOLLE began when the Department of Defense started looking to replace the ALICE pack in 1994. Soldiers and Marines took a survey in 1996 resulting in a project to design a load-carrying system that’s modular, durable and comfortable, requirements that led to the MOLLE.

Pack, Assault, MOLLE NSN 8465-01-513-4083
Pack, Assault, MOLLE NSN 8465-01-513-4083

The U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, located at Natick, MA assisted with biomechanical studies to find the most efficient way to carry loads and investigated the interaction between different load-carriage equipment and human performance. The Center for Military Biomechanics Research (CMBR) launched a comparison between a commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) internal frame pack and the standard ALICE which revealed reduced energy cost and lower postural deviations when carrying a 75 lb. load in the COTS pack. The lower energy cost and preferred walking posture associated with the commercial pack were attributed to its volume configuration and related load center of mass location. The taller, narrower commercial pack afforded a more optimal load center of mass placement on the body compared to the ALICE.

Although the internal frame COTS pack was rejected as a replacement for the ALICE pack due, in part, to its excessive heat retention, a similar volume configuration was incorporated into the design of the Modular Lightweight Load Carrying Equipment (MOLLE) pack. Other biomechanically advantageous characteristics, such as a load-distributing waist belt, were also used in the MOLLE design.

MOLLE prototypes were developed at the U.S. Army Soldier Systems Center (Natick, MA). New technology was used for the MOLLE’s frame, which was first built as a model in Natick’s Rapid Prototyping Facility. Instead of the tubular aluminum used with the ALICE, a new anatomically-contoured frame made with plastic originally used in automobile bumpers has dramatically increased durability, functioning in temperatures ranging from -40 to 120 degrees F.

The MOLLE prototype was evaluated by the CMBR, and as a result of its demonstrated superior performance characteristics, the MOLLE pack has been accepted as the replacement for the ALICE pack as the standard individual load-carrying equipment for the Army and Marine Corps. Soldiers from the 25th Infantry Division in Hawaii tested the MOLLE for six months, and it was well-received even with loads exceeding 120 pounds. The Army also conducted extensive testing on the MOLLE prototype using female soldiers. Based on the results of this test, the size of the MOLLE was reduced slightly to meet the needs of male and female soldiers.

Specialty Defense Inc. in Dunmore, PA got the first contract to manufacture 216,000 MOLLE systems for the entire Marine Corps and initial Army fielding, beginning in October 2001. In February 2002 an additional 1,200 MOLLE backpack frames were procured for the Marine Expeditionary Unit deploying to Afghanistan.

MOLLE equipment did not see widespread issue until 2003, then focused mostly on deployments to Afghanistan with limited use in Iraq. Originally MOLLE was produced in woodland camouflage, followed by desert camouflage in 2004 and finally, beginning in 2006, Universal Camouflage pattern was made the standard.

MOLLE Description

MOLLE USMC

MOLLE is a fully integrated, modular load bearing system consisting of a load bearing vest with butt pack, main ruck with sustainment pouches and sleeping bag compartment attached to an external frame. There is also a patrol pack, which can be used separately or combined with the main ruck for added load carrying capability. MOLLE can be configured in several different variations to fit the load handling needs of the mission. The load-bearing vest is always worn and holds pockets for magazines and hand grenades. A connecting device on the vest is designed so that the external frame of the main ruck attaches to the waist belt of the vest to transfer the load from the shoulders and back to the hips where it can be carried much easier with less fatigue.

The nylon mesh vest has removable pockets to accommodate different carrying needs and is one of the main components of the MOLLE system. The different variations of the load-bearing vest are designed for each member of a squad. These configurations include a rifleman, pistol, squad automatic weapon, grenadier, and corpsman configuration.

MOLLE also advances load-carrying ability with its new suspension system. Heavily-padded shoulder straps and waist belt are adjustable for varying torso lengths, eliminating the two sizes of ALICE. More weight is distributed at the shoulders and hips, and during a prolonged road march, soldiers can shift the weight to where it feels more comfortable.

Soldiers with MOLLE

The Fighting Load Carrier (FLC) replaces the Load Bearing Equipment (LBE) web belt and suspenders of the ALICE. FLC significantly increases the amount of ammunition soldiers can carry, and weight is evenly distributed across the torso. The vest has no metal clips or hooks that can be awkward and dig into the skin, and has an H-harness in back to minimize heat buildup. It’s adjustable to all sizes, and because the vest sits high, soldiers can fasten the MOLLE frame waist belt underneath the FLC to distribute some of the load to the hips. Three flap pockets on the FLC each hold two 30-round magazines, two grenade pockets and two canteen pouches.

The rucksack has a front pocket to hold a claymore antipersonnel mine. Inside is a bandolier with a capacity for six 30-round magazines and a removable tactical radio pocket. A detachable sustainment pouch on each side is big enough to hold a Meal, Ready-to-Eat (MRE) with room to spare, and underneath the rucksack, a sleeping bag compartment was designed to hold the Army’s new modular sleeping bag.

All of the larger pouches of MOLLE, such as the outside rucksack pouches, have D-rings for carrying with a sling and use plastic see-through identification windows so soldiers don’t have to marker or tape their name onto the MOLLE’s camouflaged, urethane-coated nylon fabric. Each system comes with two 6-foot lashing straps for carrying large objects, such as a mortar plate or five-gallon containers. If one of the plastic buckles breaks, a repair kit carries a bag of spares for simple replacement.

Every MOLLE comes with a tube-delivered water pouch for on-the-move hydration to supplement the one-quart canteen. The standard issue version is not for use in a chemical or biological agent-contaminated environment, although efforts are ongoing to develop a mobile hydration system for all conditions.

Adapting to the mission will be easier with a detachable pack. The pack holds gear such as extra water, rations and ammunition soldiers would need for 72 hours or less while eliminating other items that might get in the way.

The modular design supports movement to an objective, then dump the big pack, take off the detachable pack and be ready to fight. The side sustainment pouches can be removed from the rucksack and placed on the patrol pack to give the same carrying capacity as the medium ALICE pack.

The innovative MOLLE Pouch Attachment Ladder System (PALS) of interwoven straps has become the standard way to attach small pouches, accessory carriers and other attachments for MOLLE equipment and most other systems developed since MOLLE, such as body armor, load bearing equipment or vests. ALICE clips and other methods have been completely replaced by MOLLE PALS.

MOLLE II Equipment

Field user feedback on the original MOLLE led to modified designs to some of the MOLLE components. With these changes, MOLLE became MOLLE II. Specific changes included:

Eliminated the quick-release frame integrated into the load bearing vest (LBV)
The probe and socket mechanism changed to a quick-release mechanism for frame waist belt, now permanently-mounted to the frame
MOLLE II permanently attached waistbelt comes in one size (Same NSN as the MOLLE size small waistbelt, NSN 8465-01-465-2109)
MOLLE LBV redesigned to eliminate the molded waistbelt, called the MOLLE II Fighting Load Carrier (FLC) (Same NSN as the MOLLE LBV. NSN 8465-01-465-2056)
MOLLE Utility Belt (NSN 8465-01-465-2082) eliminated by building the functionality into the vest
MOLLE butt pack replaced by the MOLLE II waist pack (Same NSN)
MOLLE II Pouch, Canteen Carrier/Utility was introduced (NSN 8465-01-484-0450)
MOLLE 30rd Single Magazine Pocket eliminated (NSN 8465-01-465-2079)
The MOLLE Care and Use Manual is available at the linked page. MOLLE equipment is available from Amazon, and other suppliers.

MOLLE Evolves for the Army and is Replaced by the USMC

Based on user feedback on the original system, the MOLLE requirements were modified to eliminate the need for a quick-release frame that integrates into the load-bearing vest. The change allowed developers to replace the probe and socket mechanism, which caused problems for some soldiers and Marines, with a quick-release mechanism for a more traditional permanently-mounted waist belt on the frame.

In Afghanistan, troops noted that MOLLE zippers were bursting open when the bags were stuffed full. Another defect was that the straps weren’t long enough to be easily adjusted over body armor such as PASGT or Interceptor. MOLLE was changed to provide locking zippers and longer shoulder straps.

The Marine Corps was not satisficed by the evolution of MOLLE and has replaced MOLLE (and the aging ALICE (All-purpose Lightweight Individual Carrying Equipment) with the Improved Load Bearing Equipment (ILBE).

MOLLE Moves into the future with Blue Force Gear

We have highlighted the advanced technology that is being employed by Blue Force Gear.

Helium Whisper 

Ten-Speed

RACKminus and SPLITminus

These new advancements are likely to be future of the MOLLE systems as well as personal defense, hiking, air-soft and tactical operators for the forceable future.

Shop MOLLE gear on Amazon

Ruger LC9 Review

Watch Hickok45’s review of the Ruger LC9 on Youtube. This is the video that made me go out and buy one. Later this month expect to see my first Youtube video which will be a review of this gun.

This is a single stack 6 or 7 round magazine that is perfect for concealed pocket carry.

The safety for many is a nice feature for pocket cary.

The trigger is an exceptionally long pull. This is a nice safety feature but will certainly hurt your ability to group the bullets. Galloway precission makes an adjusted trigger you can find here. This makes a big difference from what I have read and seen though I have not tried it yet. I did buy the guide rod and that made a difference that was worth the investment.

The blue on the actual barrel is garbage in my opinion. It started coming off in the first 50 rounds I shot. I did find in this linked video however a great way to make the barrel look nice by removing the blue that comes off anyways.

If you have this gun please leave a comment and let me know what you think of it. If you have a pocket holster for this please let me know as well since I am looking for a better pocket holster.

Zero your AR-15 Iron Sites

This is a fantastic video for those of you that are new to the AR platform or have not had much experience with setting mechanical zero on a rifle. This will also work for many red dot sites that are commonly used with AR-15’s.

Check out Safe Arms Review on Youtube and be sure to watch this great video on how to best zero your AR-15 .