Advertisement

LPVO v. ACOG with the man.. the myth.. the Thumb

“ACOGs are dumb.”Steve “Yeti” Fisher

A video share for all you readers in quarantine as Mike ‘GarandThumb’ goes over the TA31 ACSS ACOG variant. It’s probably the best variant of the tough little optic that exists, although I haven’t yet played with the RCO update the USMC did a while back, and that looked promising.

As to Steve’s quote above (real quote, said to me as I ran an ACOG in Carbine Essentials.. again.. just because), every major optic has its fans and detractors. It’s the nature of things. Larry Vickers is no fan of the EOTech but SOCOM is. I, personally, think the Vortex UH-1 and Meprolight RDS are both sub-par for one or another reasons, both functional critiques and personal preference.

It’s not that X or Y are ‘bad‘ optics, it’s working within a combination of limitations and personal preferences. The ACOG, for all its strengths, has limits. I like ACOGs and will accept those limits. Others will not. They are both correct perspectives.

Steve Fisher won’t falsely attribute a flaw to an ACOG that it doesn’t have. Professionals, critics being as objective as they can, won’t add flaws. They don’t need to. It comes down to an optic not working in the manner the user needs from their optic, so that optic “sucks”.

So the moral of the story is this, know your system strengths and deficiencies and do a quick double check that it all does what you need it to do. Wants, cool factor, collector factor, cloning, all that jazz can be put in the need it to do column.

That’s fine. Guns can be fun. That is allowed.

MandoBlaster This Is The WayCR

All that to say that ACOGs are still awesome.

“ACOGs are dumb,” Steve chimes in from somewhere.

And yes ACOGs are dumb if the optic you need is outside the parameters of what the ACOG does. I’m equally not putting a $3,000 5-25x on a general purpose carbine, because that too is dumb.

Kimber Team Match II 9mm Review

Kimber has an interesting reputation in the firearms community. On one hand, they’re a popular 1911 with people looking for a “nice” 1911 due to their price point and generally nice appearance. On the other hand, many serious shooters don’t like Kimber, due to documented issues with reliability. When I set out to do a Kimber Team Match II 9mm Review, I was…skeptical at the beginning.

Right off the bat, I wanted to like the gun. The Kimber Team Match II 9mm is intended for competition shooters, with adjustable sights and a magazine well for fast reloads. But, full size 9mm 1911s often have problems with reliability, and again factor in “Kimber” and who knows what to expect. I started the test with the 10-8 Performance Function check, a course of fire designed to expose flaws in a 1911’s extractor function. The Kimber Team Match II passed this part of the review with flying colors, which was surprising.

Up next was the long slog through 2,000 rounds of ammo. I shot the Kimber at Steel Challenge, I shot it in training, and eventually the Kimber Team Match II 9mm hit 2,000 rounds. Want to know how many failures it had during that time? 1. That’s right, out of 2,000 rounds fired in various conditions, the Kimber didn’t complete its entire cycle of operations one time. For a full size 1911 in 9mm that’s impressive regardless, and it’s especially impressive considering that this 1911 says Kimber on the slide.

I didn’t have any serious complaints about the Kimber Team Match II 9mm. I would have preferred different grips on the gun, but that’s fixed with some aftermarket grips from VZ. Other than that, I liked this gun. Easy to shoot well, I turned in a couple of personal best runs on Steel Challenge stages with it. With only 1 malfunction in 2,000 rounds it was also very reliable. Sure, it’s a sample size of one, but this one Kimber was awesome.

It’s Saturday, I’m watching Forgotten Weapons

Today’s rabbit hole is the M1 Carbine, an influential rifle in ways less famous than the M1 Garand perhaps, but more far reaching and sustained. Variations on the M1 Carbine gas system are used in several modern rifles, including my favored FN SCAR.

The M1 Carbine rolled out of Winchester, who weren’t even looking to participate in the ‘Light Rifle’ competition the military was running, as an adapted downsized concept of their ‘M2’. This occured after US Army Ordnance looked at the Winchester M2 rifle and said, “Neat, make it Smol.”

So William Roemer and Fred Humiston, with their team, did. David Marshall “Carbine” Williams was mostly involved by having done preparatory work on other projects, like the M2, and didn’t participate in the actual arms competition portion of it actively.

Now, the Winchester M2 rifle is not to be confused with the M2 Carbine, which Winchester also did participate in making.

The low digit ‘M’ markings are a rough time…

But, back to the M2… Carbine, M2 Carbine. While the M1 Carbine was a nice little 5lb PDW type weapon, similar to how M4’s were utilized in early GWOT especially by the Marine Corps, the M2 was seen as a way to add easy select fire capability and ammo capacity for troops who could utilize that to effect. Supply guy might get an M1 Carbine but the light mortar section would get M2’s and that sort of thing.

It was a simple conversion requiring a little mod work and a few parts, not a different receiver. That is something we are unused to seeing in our AR centric gun culture and, as Ian points out, makes it a little weird legally.

Cali! Get your Ammo!

U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez in San Diego ruled in favor of the California Rifle & Pistol Association, which asked him to stop the checks and related restrictions on ammo sales.

On Thursday Judge Benitez blocked the California law requiring background checks for people buying ammunition, harshly rebuking the rules as “onerous and convoluted” regulations that violate the constitutional right to bear arms.

“The experiment has been tried. The casualties have been counted. California’s new ammunition background check law misfires and the Second Amendment rights of California citizens have been gravely injured,”

New York was the first state to require a ‘comprehensive ammunition background check system’ for each sale, but it never took effect (I wonder why). That left California as the first to the extend firearm background checks to each ammunition sale.

Four other states – Connecticut, Illinois, Massachusetts and New Jersey – require buyers to undergo background checks to obtain firearms or ammunition licenses that they must show when buying bullets, according to the Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence.

And now California is the first to be told to pound sand on their idiotic program which has been problem plagued from its inception. They passed the law and its effect date passed before the system was even online. Good job.

Well, thanks to Judge Benitez and his gavel of justice, Californians can once again enjoy the reasonable convenience of online ordering. Now if we can just get that magazine ban back off the books. Unfortunately though that ruling was Benitez too it is currently out of his capable hands.

Widener’s has AMMO too, on a completely unrelated note… of course.

D.C. Gets into the Gun Business

D.C. police take over as federal firearms licensee in the District

The Washington D.C. Police had to apply to the BATFE for a Federal Firearms License when the only privately held license within the jurisdiction closed.

D.C. police are now in charge of facilitating the sale of pistols to city residents after the District’s only federal firearms licensee abruptly stopped work in March, citing a spike in demand during the pandemic.

The move announced Monday gives the police department responsibility for deciding who can legally possess a firearm, and then acting as an intermediary between purchasers and sellers. City residents cannot legally buy guns without such a go-between. -WP

Perhaps now the D.C. Police will experience just what a colossal administrative nightmare it is to do transfers and amend their policy? Perhaps they will put pressure on lawmakers to say that, if Universal Background Checks are so important, then the public needs to be able to run NICS checks…

But no, that won’t happen, they’ll just push the responsibility back off once another licensee gets approved.

Mayor Muriel E. Bowser (D) said officials will continue to seek a private dealer to replace Charles Sykes, the firearm licensee who had been handling such transactions, but they didn’t want to leave people unable to obtain guns in the interim. She said once a replacement is found, police will give up that part of the job.

I don’t blame Charles in the least for closing and not wanting to deal with the rush, being the sole D.C. FFL and dealing with all of those transfers and the book keeping is honestly nightmarish. Mayor Bowser (yes, I laughed and made a Mario joke too) took a prudent measure here in acquiring the FFL at the department.

After all, wouldn’t want another lawsuit to come down and gut another D.C. handgun law now would we by having a defacto handgun ban in place… again.

I believed UBC laws were ridiculous for several reasons prior to having an FFL myself… Then dealing with NICS working at an FFL compounded those reasons further due to the irregular reliability of the system and the manner that it can shut down transfers for no more poignant reason than, “computer broke, sorry.”

Now as an FFL holder myself I see the final layer of paperwork that just adds that much more complexity, legislated above us, the ATF, and the FBI’s pay grades, to the whole transaction. Neither end of situation can change the rules but both must abide by them and the individual just trying to buy a handgun as is their constitutionally protected right gets the shaft.

And then you run into situations like D.C. just did. You cannot mandate someone stay in business, maintain their FFL, and stay open if they don’t want to. Especially when simultaneously mandating social distancing and non-mandatory business closures.

While I sympathize with D.C. residents who are ultimately getting the short end of the stick here, I always maintain hope that when the good idea fairy comes home to roost in a stupid policy that the pain bites an organization high enough up to influence positive change. While I don’t know for certain, perhaps this will allow residents access to any FFL for the transfer instead of one within the limits of D.C. Perhaps, dare I hope, they will abandon this onerous municipal policy in favor of more effective ones.

Glock 17 Reliability Challenge

What happens when you take a brand-new Gen5 Glock 17 and rapid fire 200 rounds through it? Well in the Glock 17 Reliability Challenge, we find out.

Whenever we do something like the Glock 17 Reliability Challenge, the first question people ask is “what’s the point” to which I answer “because.” We have ammo, we have time, and it’s interesting to see what happens to guns when you shoot them a bunch over a short period. For example, in this challenge, my front sight flew off about halfway through. That was surprising! It also would have happened at some point to the front sight, so better it happens during a controlled range test than in a match, a class, or god forbid a self-defense situation.

The good news is that the gun itself worked fine. There were no mechanical failures, other than the front sight yeeting itself into oblivion. During the Glock 17 Reliability Challenge, the area directly under the chamber, where the barrel lugs lock into the frame got too hot to touch, and remained that way for a while after the test. In fact, Gen5 Glocks seem to heat up a lot faster than their previous generation counterparts.

Because this is an older video, the gun tested was one of the first commercially available Gen5 Glock 17s. The Gen5 is interesting because unlike earlier Generations that made iterative changes to the Glock, it is almost a whole new pistol from the ground up. New recoil springs, new trigger engagement, new slide stop springs, new slide profile, new barrel, almost everything about the Gen5 guns is a re-design from previous generations. That’s a good thing, because it addresses a lot of the complaints people had about the Gen4 guns.

Sure, it’s fun to shoot 200 rounds full speed during the Glock 17 Reliability Challenge. It’s a bummer this gun lost its front sight, but that’s an easy fix, and something that can be permanently fixed with a little loctite and a 10-8 Performance front sight. I would definitely carry this Glock 17.

China chooses the IWI Galil ACE!

Image via Asia Times

What does the new QBZ-191 remind you of?

Yup.. there it is. Thanks IWI and GunMagWarehouse!

Apparently China has released video of their new 5.8x42mm conventional layout assault rifle. The spacey looking QBZ-95 had too many problems. That makes another world military power that had bullpups and has reverted to conventional layout rifles.

Israel’s X95, Austria’s AUG, The UK’s SA80A3, and Australia’s EF88/F90 AUG one-off (I happen to like it the most of the AUG’s) are pretty much the last of military bullpups. They’re hanging strong. I like bullpup rifles, have had a few and still do. But there are simply weak points in the designs too that conventional rifles mitigate.

But back to the ACE..er… QBZ-191

First, it seems clear that they are still militarily heavily married to the AK concept. The QBZ-191 looks primarily like a Galil ACE with perhaps a little FAL/XCR on the back end of the receiver. A one front hinge pin design. They retained AK rock-in magazines even.

I’m not certain if the charging handle or safety selector are ambidextrous (I suspect the selector is) but it looks like the have gone with some manner of non-reciprocating adaption of the standard AK charging handle with a fairly short travel, location is consistent with that theory.

Three barrel lengths have been listed. 10.5″, 14.5″, and an unspecified ‘Marksman’ length.

In addition to closely copying the ACE as a base rifle it looks like they copied PMAGs and a forend from Magpul. The front sight might fold FN SCAR style, the rear sight does. Stock looks adjustable.

They are also proclaiming a new projectile design, probably a clone of M855A1.

It’s like they waited for all the other militaries and developers to do the groundwork for awhile and then went to SHOT going, “I’ll clone that, and that, and these, and… what are you gonna do about it? We’re literally the Chinese government.”

NPR on the New Gun Owners

NPR is not known as a bastion of second amendment support. Many of their employees come off as actively hostile towards the notions of individual weapons ownership. Others just don’t appear to be able to mentally grasp the reasoning for a personal weapon. They try, they just aren’t able to walk the mile in the shoes.

It’s that case that seems to crop up with NPR’s coverage of the new Coronavirus gun owners.

Coronavirus Fears Have Produced A Lot Of New Gun Owners — And Safety Concerns

As the piece opens we get a look into their headspace, the perspective they are looking at this whole thing from.

As Americans flock to gun stores in the face of coronavirus fears, many gun dealers report an influx of new customers, taking home a deadly weapon for the first time. In response, long-time gun owners from across the U.S. are stepping up to help these newcomers get some safety training in the age of social distancing.

I’ve put the text in bold as I believe this is the crux of the perspective problem, or at least one of the pillars supporting it. A firearm is the only item they are consciously acknowledging as a deadly weapon. Now, it isn’t that they don’t believe these people have a knife block in their kitchen or didn’t drive to the gun store in a vehicle, both of which are lethal, it is the fact they do not consciously make the connection that those two items are deadly too. They aren’t assigning a proportiant risk factor to a knife or a car or any other device, in their minds the gun is inexplicably fundamentally different.

In the minds of aware and active firearm owners firearms are not different. They are different faces on the multi-faceted dice set we call risk. Nothing within ‘Risk’ gets assigned a special value (except Australia) and we see balancing risk with mitigation factors as part of what we do daily. The NPR author appears to give guns a special risk value, they are different.

What I cannot determine is why they are different, perhaps anymore than they can fathom why I want a firearm. My working theory is that because a gun is a deliberately built weapon it occupies that special risk value which is disproportionately magnified from its working societal risk value. Additionally, since other deliberately built weapons, like swords or crossbows, are used in far fewer crimes they get put into the novelty category and are assigned and disproportionately low risk value.

That’s my theory at least. They are not rationalizing and organizing risk the way that we are.

But back to the article. NPR then does a few paragraph highlight Chuck Rossi’s Open Source Defense and the various other online personalities who made content for new gun owners to find and learn. They highlight that gun owners feel an obligation to help new owners safely start their path toward proficiency.

We welcome all the new owners and ask them to please be cautious, but not nervous, ask questions. Ask lots of questions. The reason we have that perspective goes back to how we assign risk.

Next.. NPR brings in ‘The Skeptic’. The reasonable voice that doesn’t project the bafoonish antics of a Moms Demand Actioneer or ‘Ghost Gun’ Kevin de Leon (who are demonstrable morons.) No, they bring in Dr. Emmy Betz.

Dr. Betz studies injury research and she worries that having a gun in the home risks ‘escalating violent confrontations.’

“Specifically, in cases of domestic violence or when someone is suicidal — that having that gun present could turn a situation deadly,” Betz says.

Dr. Betz, I would assume, is not a gun owner. And despite her knowledge within the field of injury statistics I would guess she too cannot rationalize risk the way a firearm owner does. She puts firearms in the special category and assigns them values outside that which she does for other accessible objects.

“Specifically, in cases of domestic violence…” is a telling line here. As you and I well know, anyone with a domestic violence conviction is a prohibited person. No guns, unless they have gone through rigorous legal process of proving to a court of law enough proof they are no longer a risk and should have their right restored. So the risk Dr. Betz is highlighting is the notional risk coming from those with no conviction for domestic violence. She is highlighting the narrow sliver of alleged domestic abusers and using it to broadly advocate restriction or prohibition of firearms. It is a hell of a strawman argument. It could get her destroyed in a courtroom, using domestic violence as your prohibitor and then pointing at a group that has no history of domestic violence.

Am I suggesting unconvicted abusers do not exist? Not in the slightest. I am saying that these legal parameters cannot be vague and pointing to a group with no history of a crime and asking, “but what about that crime?” is about as vague, reaching, and projectionist as it gets.

Then there is the suicide statistic. We have a weird societal dissonance with suicide in which we seem to accept certain methods and reject others (Dr. assisted for example) and there are large swaths of the public morally and ethically opposed to suicide in any form while others see it as a tragedy to be avoided if possible and mourned if it occurs. Suicide is not an easy subject to quantify.

But we do have hard data on a few items, and suicide being independent of method is one we have quite a bit of data on. But how does NPR take on the suicide quandry?

Every year, tens of thousands of people die by firearm suicide or domestic violence homicideResearch has shown that the presence of a gun is associated with a higher risk for both.

Uh oh… a false equivalency. That statement is not untrue, but it certainly reads like domestic violence and suicide must have very similar numbers, right?

The death toll of combining firearm suicides (usually roughly double the homicide total: 21,175 suicides, 11,208 homicides – U.S. 2013 CDC) with domestic violence homicide numbers are in the tens of thousands. But suicide alone is in the tens of thousands. Intimate partner killings account for somewhere between 1500-2500 deaths depending upon the year, usually about 12-18% of the total homicides… which makes them 10% or less of the combined number and won’t move the total into the next 10’s bracket.

You wouldn’t get that distinction from the statement NPR made though, would you?

But do you want to know what item is in the next 10’s bracket? Vehicle deaths: 32,719 (NHTSA 2013). Which brings us back to our perspectives on risk and how we categorize it.

In the mind of someone like myself, an accidental death is an accidental death. In accidental deaths method matters because it was environmental factors and/or human error which caused the death(s). Knowledge of the method of injury/death allows us to build in mitigating safety precautions. It allows us to do that effectively because their was not a motive to cause the injury(s)/death(s).

When it is a deliberate death, to include deliberate acts of harm which result in death, method does not matter. If [Act] by [Individual(s)] could reasonably result in my death or the death of someone I am protecting I must act decisively to mitigate that. The risk is already at lethal. Gun, knife, tire iron, car, sword, explosive, are not the thing I need to mitigate, the person(s) using them are.

Suicides are their own category of deliberate death because victim and instigator are one in the same.

Guns, in the minds of people like Dr. Betz, seem to cross categories for the sole reason that a gun was involved. They get their special category because guns are deliberately built weapons. Part of my theory here includes the fundamental and irrational rejection of the necessity of weapons in society. They themselves, the individual, and those of like mind cannot foresee a need therefore there is no need. They cannot rationalize that others who see the need see it just as strongly as they do and on a base level they reject that point of view as naturally inferior and less rational to their own, data be damned.

Gun owners suffer perspective and confirmation bias just as much as anyone else, however it is my observation that informed gun owners are consistently looking at wider data pools and broader perspective ranges (to include that fact that not everyone rationalizes like they do) than the people staunchly opposed to owning guns. This comes with the conjoined conclusion that some of those rationalization perspective will be hostile. That, in turn, means that ‘right’, ‘wrong’, or somewhere between, a lethal threat to you and yours can only be mitigated by some manner of force equivalency.

So although Betz says it is “wonderful” that gun owners are stepping up to offer training, she worries that the combination of more guns plus coronavirus fear and anxiety could lead to more gun deaths.

“I’m skeptical,” Betz says, “that all of these new purchasers are getting the training that they need and getting the guidance around storage devices that they need.”

Dr. Betz, what do they need and what are you doing to help provide it? The gun owning community stepped up and into that need, what have you done?

NPR, are you looking to help these new owners or portray them as neo-barbarians too scared to recognize you don’t ‘need’ a weapon in ‘modern’ society? The false equivalency laced into the report and the line that you leave on with Dr. Betz gives me a pretty good idea of your answer, but I would like to be clear.

Machine Gun Maintenance: Oil Attraction

The Concept

A M240L gas regulator with caked on carbon

The concept is quite simple. Don’t put lubricant on anything that comes into direct contact with the gas system in a machine gun.

The Machine Gun Gas System

A lot of these systems come with a gas system that has three simple parts you need to watch for problems. The gas regulator, gas cylinder, and piston. These parts are inherently important to keep free and clear of caked on carbon to allow proper gas pressure.

Parts to Keep Lubricant Off

The manual states NOT to put CLP (Cleaner, Lubricant, Preservative) on gas regulator, barrel gas port, piston, interior of gas cylinder, and bolt face.

If you do need to use CLP, let it soak for a bit before removing the carbon and be sure to use a dry cleaner after to dry the rest of the CLP off. I use dry cleaning solvent.

A piston with caked on carbon on the inside

Next Maintenance Article.. how to remove the carbon (and rust).

Scraping at carbon with the Multitasker Tools Series 3x

Disclaimer: I am referencing Mil approved CLP to all of these statements. It is known to pull up carbon as it is a CLEANER, lubricant, and preservative. If you are using a different lubricant it may work, but differently and with unknown long term effects. However if you are using a lube in relation to Mil CLP it may do these same things.

[Editor’s Note: This is a prudent thing to do for any gas piston system by the way. Machine guns just see a lot more rounds.]

Bundeswehr G36 with 9-Hole Reviews

The G36 was the reunited Germany’s NATO rifle, their admittance back into “the good guys” in full with a modernizing defense force. In the 90’s where it was developed it was a technological marvel, to nearly the same degree as the AR-15 was back in the 60’s with its extensive use of aluminum. The polymer construction and a profile fit for sci-fi didn’t hurt its appeal at all either.

The G36 has faults, all platforms do, but one fault it did not have was the hearsay that led to the 2015 decision to replace the rifle in German service. The rumor that the G36 rifle is ‘inaccurate’ when a couple magazines have been put through it. This has been disproven by multiple independent tests and several theories have been brought forward to explain the phenomenon that german troops claimed to have experienced within the anecdotal evidence. This didn’t change the G36’s fate, and maybe it was time for an update.. but the reason was false.

The anecdotal claims were used to deride the G36 until the Bundeswehr said they would “upgrade” their carbines. The problem they’ve found is that the G36 was built well enough that the new rifles aren’t outperforming the old one by that great a margin… and aren’t hitting a rather ludicrous accuracy requirement.

Where have we heard these things before?

These claims parallel similar motivated attacks against the M4 by Robert Scales, a retired US Army General. Scales led a vicious campaign against the M4 Carbine. I believe Scales was more ideologically motivated than the elements in Germany were, but that doesn’t change the fact that both sources were using suspect and faulty data to support canning the rifles.

Tests of both platforms have shown they work well.

The attack on the G36 was anecdotal accuracy while the attack on the M4 was anecdotal reliability. Scales famously and loudly proclaimed the M4 jamming caused the deaths of several soldiers under fire in Afghanistan. A review of the battle found that was simply an absurd claim, the weapons that went down during that prolonged firefight were belt-fed machine guns and the casualties taken by US forces were the result of effective enemy action, not equipment failures. Soldiers can get killed in firefights, just because a soldier had an M4 with a red dot on it instead of a SCAR with an LPVO doesn’t mean the conscript goat herder with the Mosin Nagant firing rounds in that soldier’s general direction can get a hit that misses the soldiers plates and wounds or kills them.

Now, all things being equal, there are rifles, like my favorite FN SCAR, that are academically more reliable, in the notorious “Dust Test” the M4 had a stoppage rate of 882/60,000 with 863 being soft stoppages that were easily cleared with continued function. That reported rate was also an outlier in the test and in other iterations the M4 performed much closer to the other rifles, magazine also accounted for a high rate of failures with 239 attributed.

The SCAR, in comparison had a stoppage rate of 226/60,000, which is roughly a 4 times improvement. But from a different perspective the M4, at its worst extreme outlier failure rate, was 98.5% effective while the SCAR was 99.6%. The SCAR, from this wider view, is only 1.1% more reliable and the H&K 416 about the same. The H&K XM8, a wild variant of the G36 for the US Army back in the early 2000’s, actually performed the best with 127/60,000 or 99.78% reliability.

In 1990 the standard for M4 reliability was 1:600 (99.83%) mean (average) rounds between failure given normal operating conditions (the dust test was an extreme operating condition) the standard in 2013 for the M4A1 was 1:1,691 (99.94%). In practical terms that meant a soldier would have to fire 3 full combat loads (210 rounds, 7 magazines, standard combat load) before likely experiencing 1 stoppage in a 1990’s M4, and today would have to fire 8 full combat loads.

We are magnitudes ahead of when auto-loading rifles first entered US hands as a standard, the M1 Garand’s rate was only 1:9 (87.2%) when it was chosen to replace the M1903 in 1940 (USMC). 80 years later we are at the razor’s edge of reliability where we are talking tenths and hundredths of a percentage difference.

What was probably most illustrative about all the the trials worldwide since the turn of the century is that we’ve largely maxed the 5.56x45mm cartridge and its competitors. All these designs work well when built well, AR, SCAR, AK, XCR, X95, G36, etc. The limits are largely imposed by where on the diminishing returns curve a particular group wants to sit. Does a 2 MOA or 1.75 MOA choice matter for a rifle that’s extreme range is 600 meters, practical is 300-400 meters, and is it worth $200, $400, $1,000 per unit cost to implement?

New Systems – NGSW

The new NGSW rifle system, to include optic, is supposed to push effective ranges of the fighting rifle to 1,000 meters. We had to change calibers to do that. But given some quick and dirty math the new rifles won’t be drastically more accurate than today’s rifles, they will just have a caliber that can reach the distance. The M110 is held to 1.1 MOA accuracy which should produce a roughly 12″ group at 1,000 meters if the .308 had the legs to get there consistently. The new 6.5 Creedmoor’s should make that much easier.

Given current combat rifle accuracy standards (maybe even pushing them a little because we can) we could ask for a 90% hit probability at 1,000 meters of the NGSW rifle. Target size is an 18″x30″ (torso) hit zone and we end up with a rifle and ammunition combination that we are asking… about 1.5-2 MOA out of.

[ The Dirty Math: 18″ is 90% of a 20″ hit zone. Set that 20″ hit zone at 1,093.6 yards/1,000 meters. Given the ‘1 MOA is 1″/100 yards’ we divide our 20″ hit zone (which would give an over 90% hit rate based on the 30″ vertical target area) by the 1,093.6 yards to get .0182″/yard or 1.82″/100 yards. 1.8 MOA, the round just has to be able to get down range that far without suffering too many environmental impacts to its accuracy. The two most drastic of those impacts in the control of shooter/user/manufacturer is when the round crosses from supersonic to subsonic and the ballistic coefficient of the projectile to mitigate atmospherics.]

So ultimately this is a situation we have already been able to consistently build as an industry in shorter legged calibers with proper projectiles. 77gr 5.56x45mm rifle/ammo combinations have routinely been able to offer shooters this performance envelope. I’m very interested to see where the NGSW program lands us and what performance rounds like the .277 Fury with an advanced optic suite like the NGSW-FC will actually allow an end user to do and how much more easily. With things like active range/cant reticle adjustment and active atmospherics reticle adjustment we should be vastly increasing first round hit probability… assuming the user can shoot worth half a damn.

Beretta APX RDO Review

Every time I get a new gun from Beretta to review I get excited, and the Beretta APX RDO review is no exception. This was one of the launch models for the APX when it came out, and it my opinion it’s the best.

Before we’ve reviewed the APX Centurion, and like the Centurion the APX RDO uses Beretta’s modular grip chassis, so that the serialized part is the trigger group. This means one trigger group can move from different size chassis to create a gun that fits you. During the Beretta APX RDO review I really ended up liking the full size frame that the gun came with.

First things first – the APX RDO comes with many mounts to fit different optic plates. That’s what the RDO stands for, after all. This model is fitted with a Trijicon RMR, which it’s still wearing right now. The RMR is still the gold standard for pistol optics, although other strong contenders like the offerings from Holosun are gaining popularity. During the Beretta APX RDO review I also sent the frame to Boresight Solutions to have it stippled to give me a better grip.

Like the Centurion, I like the slide serrations on the APX RDO. They’re large and functional, and give excellent surface contact area for slide manipulations. The stock trigger is pretty good, breaking crisply at 6 pounds, and installing Beretta’s competition striker drops that about a half pound to 5.5, with minimal take-up and a nice break. It’s the most 1911-esque trigger I’ve ever felt in a striker fired gun, so if you think that’s a good thing you’ll like the APX RDO.

Bottom line: we live in the golden age of striker fired semi-automatic pistols. I did the Beretta APX RDO review because I like Berettas and I’m close with the brand, but the truth is that you could toss an APX in a bag with a VP9, a Glock 19, a Walther PPQ, an M&P, and a Sig P320 then give that bag a good shake. Once it’s all jumbled up, reach in and grab whatever pistol comes out and you’ll be fine. It’s a good time to be alive and a good time to buy a Beretta.

New ASP Law Enforcement Agency Program Helps Address Urgent Need for Disposable Restraints

Appleton, WI, April, 2020—Armament Systems and Procedures (ASP), a leading manufacturer of law enforcement products, has announced a multi-tiered response to new guidelines and recommendations related to the use of disposable restraints. First, addressing the sudden surge in demand, the company has dramatically ramped up production of its Tri-Fold single-use restraints. Second, ASP is communicating the latest industry guidelines and potential equipment funding opportunities to agencies and the distributors who supply them. And finally, the company rapidly rolled out a program to make it fast and easy for agencies to deploy a turnkey disposable restraint solution. The program includes free equipment to help outfit officers, while reducing the overall cost to the agency.

“The health crisis obviously changed everything overnight,” says ASP CEO Kevin Parsons, “and urgently finding ways to protect the health of first responders became an immediate priority.” Parsons says that in addition to the need for things like masks and gloves, emphasis has been placed on minimizing the re-use of equipment like handcuffs, that might carry surface-borne pathogens. He points out that the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP), the Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) and others are specifically recommending that law enforcement officers use disposable restraints. “Based on the spike in demand and requests for large-scale availability, we have dramatically increased production of our Tri-Folds and we are currently manufacturing these restraints and related accessories around the clock,” says Parsons.

In conjunction with the spooled-up production, ASP quickly turned around a comprehensive communication and education effort, beginning with an informational video, and continuing with disseminating the latest industry recommendations, as well as information on a federal funding program that offers subsidies to help agencies acquire the equipment they need.

Finally, in the span of 24 hours, ASP put together and distributed an efficient, cost-saving product acquisition program for distributors and agencies. The Agency Set program offers a bulk pre-packed solution with everything needed to get disposable restraints in the field. Each set includes 300 Tri-Fold Restraints, 25 Scarab Safety Cutters, and 25 system carrying cases that can be worn on belts or vests. ASP is providing the cases at no cost, to help reduce the overall cost, while ensuring that officers have everything they need to carry and use the system.

“Officer safety has always been the cornerstone of everything we do,” says ASP’s Parsons. “The public health crisis has just expanded the definition of what it means to protect the people who protect us.”

The Masking of America – Or – Saving Civilization One Fabric Scrap at a Time

Home sewn masks on the writer’s sewing table

Those whose prepping skills have heretofore consisted solely of collecting guns and ammo are having a rude awakening these days. The fatal flaw for those whose planning extended only to “I’ll use my guns to take whatever other supplies I need” is that they failed to plan for an “incomplete” apocalypse.

The “incomplete” apocalypse we are currently experiencing has law and order still in place (and no zombies, dammit) but does have shortages of essential supplies – from hand sanitizer to N-95 masks – that you can’t just go out and rob from your neighbors.

In the face of these widespread shortages of personal protective equipment due to COVID-19, and beyond all comprehension, the country has seen a resurgence of home sewing. Yes – as in your mom’s old Singer.

Commercial tailors and clothing companies started retooling for sewing masks too, but what we are now seeing is a veritable army of home seamstresses riding to the rescue of health systems large and small. These home sewing citizens are providing tens of thousands (if not millions) of masks of all descriptions to help prevent droplet spread in a society under quarantine. Some health systems are even accepting home sewn medical gowns that are washable and reusable. 

What up until recently was considered a quaint and outdated home hobby, not even taught in schools anymore, is now proving that sewing skills and equipment are “essential” and should be included in the new prepper paradigm.

Healthcare organizations started running out of supplies back in March and were forced to figure out innovative ways to sanitize and reuse masks that were designed to be disposable. Some hospital workers were issued ONE N-95 a week, for a device which is supposed to be disposed of after each patient. Some workers were given a simple paper bag in which to store their mask in-between shifts. With sketchy compromises like that is it any wonder that the medical world started accepting any help it could get? 

The donated cloth masks, while not as effective as regular medical masks, are used by health workers not in direct patient care or even as covers for the regular masks as they are being reused.

Now that the general public has been told to cover up in public to help prevent droplet spread, the demand is even greater for face coverings of whatever sort. Do-it-yourself videos are all over the internet using everything from bandanas to socks, to army-issue skivy shirts.

Could any of us have imagined this scenario a year ago –  even preppers?

I bought some extra elastic in February thinking I might need to make a few masks for my own personal use in public, but I never imagined that the entire healthcare industry would virtually run out of personal protective equipment.

Fortunately, I’ve been a home sew-er ( as opposed to sewer – ha!) since I was a teenager, amassing a horde of fabric according to the cardinal rule of quilting – “She who dies with the most fabric, wins!” 

Think of a fabric stash as a bit like an ammo stash, only more colorful and more versatile. Last year I cleaned out scraps that were less than 3 inches square, but I’ve still got scores of yards of raw material to work with. ( I am not a hoarder, I am not a hoarder …)

I’m set for fabric, but I never imagined that certain widths of elastic would be sold out of every online retailer and even some warehouses – with a wait time of weeks to months. I never imagined that I would be scavenging elastic cording out of the bottom hems and hoods of my jackets. Then I never imagined that I’d be cutting up pairs of spandex tights to use as “jersey loops” instead of elastic. This commodity has gotten so scarce that I’ve also heard of people cutting up dollar store ace bandages for elastic.

I’m sewing masks for our office patient parents to wear so we can conserve our medical masks. Trying to determine which homemade online mask design was “best” was not something I trained for in medical school. Pleated? Shaped? Pockets for a filter? What kind? Furnace filter? Shop Towel? Vacuum bag? It’s mind-boggling, and genuinely useful studies are scarce. We are basically all making this up as we go along and hoping for the best.

I am purposely trying to avoid using tie strings instead of elastic ear loops, reasoning that young mommies with a baby on a hip can’t use two hands to tie on a mask. Also, being a pediatrician, I worry about strangulation hazards with long strings.

There are home sew-ers out there who are churning out hundreds of masks a week while they are stuck at home. In my opinion they are true home-bound heroes. I can’t begin to touch those numbers because I’m still working, but I’m well on my way to two hundred so far and am becoming more efficient as I go. Cutting out fabric on my office desk in-between patients is also something that I never imagined that I would be doing during this madness.

Am I the only one who finds a bit of irony in the fact that millennials who seemed perfectly willing to sacrifice their elders to this pandemic, are now having their butts saved by those same elders armed with home sewing machines? There’s a lesson in there somewhere.

So remember kids – prepping isn’t “only” about guns and ammo. Sometimes it’s about something as mundane as elastic and your mom’s old sewing machine.

A… K… Fiddy!

Brandon brings us the big bore AK update that the internet is craving.

Watching the prototyping and R&D processes that you can find online is nearly always a fun fantastically illustrative experience for we folks who have not done it. Watching as developers work with the most miniscule details that we would never think of as important and almost certainly overlook ourselves.

Like the ejector. The fact that the ejector design, probably among the least exciting parts in a rifle, needs such crucial thought and the reasons behind it all are fascinating. The fact that Brandon has reverted several earlier parts to more AK like designs and that he has discovered that the changes make work out better in many ways is process that is genuinely enjoyable to follow. The fact that material selection for both the final product and prototyping is so critical and cost controls are another topic that the end user never seems to be in a position to appreciate.

The fact that the AK-50 is reverting more and more into an AK in function and not just vaguely exterior form is a cool development that I’m glad Brandon has been able to push, even if it is just for his enjoyment as an AK enthusiast.

Closer and closer to a final product. And it is amusing to see that in many ways, “Nyet, Rifle was fine.” even when upscaled to so drastic a degree.

NEXT GENERATION SQUAD WEAPON FIRE CONTROL (NGSW-FC)

Even in the case of a battery power loss, soldiers are left with an uncompromised 1-8x, direct-view optic and glass-etched reticle exceeding current capability.

BARNEVELD, Wis. For the last 18 years, innovation has meant everything to Vortex Optics. It’s meant our emergence as a leader in the sport optics industry. It’s allowed us to provide our customers the tools they need to pursue and protect what matters most in their lives.

But starting today, our dedication to innovation means something even more.

We’re honored to announce that the US Army – PM Soldier Lethality awarded Vortex® an agreement to deliver the Next Generation Squad Weapon-Fire Control (NGSW-FC) Production Ready Prototypes for Soldier TouchPoint (STP) evaluations.
As a direct-view optic, the 1-8×30 Active Reticle™ Fire Control provides everything you’d expect from a variable-power, first focal plane riflescope. When augmented with an overlaid digital display, however, it provides features unheard of in a traditional small arms fire control.

“As a veteran-owned, non-traditional defense contractor, it’s very important to us that we listen to warfighters,” said Sam Hamilton, Chief Technical Officer at Vortex Optics. “When we learned of the soldier’s need for increased lethality out of their squad weapons—combined with the Small Arms Ammunition Configuration (SAAC) study, which proved that advancements in electro-optical fire control had the greatest potential to increase soldier’s lethality—we knew there was an important capability gap we could fill.”

The Vortex Optics 1-8×30 Active Reticle™ Fire Control is built around a revolutionary technology based on many years of internal research and development, along with multiple cooperative development efforts with the Army’s PM-Soldier Weapons group. The end result is Active Reticle™, which has been proven to increase hit percentage and decrease time to engage during US Army Soldier touchpoints over the last two years.

Hamilton said, “By combining a unity power 1-8x direct view optic utilizing a first focal plane, etched reticle, a 1km capable laser rangefinder, state of the art on-board ballistic engine, atmospheric sensor suite, and programmable active matrix micro-display overlaid onto the first focal plane, Active Reticle™ delivers a true multi-mission fire control enabling everything from CQB to designated marksmanship at the extents of the NGSW’s effective range.”

For the soldier in the field, that means the freedom to devote their entire focus downrange. Hamilton said, “End-users will no longer need to leave their field of view to consult separate rangefinders or ballistic calculators, slowing them down and compromising their situational awareness.”
About Vortex Optics: American-owned, veteran-owned, Wisconsin-based Vortex Optics designs, engineers, produces, and distributes a complete line of premium sport optics, accessories, and apparel. Built on over 30 years of providing unrivaled customer service and exceptional quality, Vortex® has emerged as a leader in the optics market.