Advertisement

RCMP still won’t release firearm models in N.S. rampage.

Image via Hallifax Today, RCMP conference announcing the Nova Scotia killings including the death of an RCMP officer.

“What I can say is that there was what could be considered a weapon that could be described that way,” Campbell said, adding that further ballistics testing was being conducted.

The confused mess that is the Canadian response to the Nova Scotia shooting continues apace. With the ban-by-decree of 1,500 firearms the powers on high assure the public that the two rifles recovered were both on the list. AR-15.com was on the list too. A website was listed as a firearm. That just fills me with confidence that all of these measures have been thoroughly researched…

Why should this matter in the US? Gun controllers like the action moms and Bloombergian mayoral minions want this to occur here.

Public Safety Minister Bill Blair tossed the buck back to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police so they could again use the ‘ongoing investigation’ line to not answer the question on what firearms were used or their sources if known. The claims that both, or one, or a few, or it depends on who is saying what noncommittal half response at the time, firearms are on the new ban list or were smuggled from the U.S. all seem to get rather fuzzy when we look at any other official statement.

From Campbell’s quote above it would seem only one of the firearms may have been banned, illegal, or modified in some manner. From Blair’s statement both had to be outlined in the new ban laid out by Trudeau… so which is it? This would be so easy to figure out if we just knew the models involved. But RCMP Superintendent Campbell and Public Safety Minister Blair are too busy pointing at each other to give information to be bothered with something so trivial.

They conveniently gloss over the fact that the offending denturist didn’t have a license to possess any firearm, making all of his actions with any firearm he owned illegal.

Now it’s extra extra extra illegal. Or will be. In two years. I’m sure they just needed that extra extra to make it all stick and now evil has been vanquished from the land, deprived of its tools of destruction.

Except fire… and the RCMP handgun that was stolen from the murdered officer. And… wait literally nothing Wortman did was remotely allowed. What will this ban accomplish for the next incident? More helpless Canadians who can’t do a legal thing to defend their lives when a man, ostensibly an RCMP officer by his dress, comes and shoots them or burns their homes down?

The Trudeau government response to this is to say that every Canadian gun owner is just a mass murderer who hasn’t yet. When you point out that this is essentially their response they deny it and cite their support for legitimate ‘sporting’ and *harrumph harrumph* but it amounts to nothing. The powers in charge are just speaking around the issue, ignoring inconvenient truths, and plowing ahead with the ban agenda they always wanted.

The RCMP will likely release the model data at a time when it won’t matter anymore, if we haven’t already passed that point. A juncture where even if someone wanted to go back and check the legality of any models in question if Wortman hadn’t already broken the law, the ban already essentially retconned the whole thing and is now the new normal.

There is still a lot of ‘grace period’ in this legal shift for Canadians for now, who knows if they’ll declare and emergency and shut down the time window. It will be interesting to see if civil noncompliance mirrors New Zealand. The biggest whole in the scheme is the one that everyone from annoyed civil persons to hardened organized criminals already exploit for every law they break, deliberate non-compliance.

So, will the RCMP hold onto this information until it no longer matters? Until it cannot be used to attack the gun ban scheme as ridiculous, even though Wortman’s lack of a PAL already makes it so? The upper echelons of the Trudeau administration already has a track record of pushing the inconvenient aside for expediency so… no bet.

And now a word from our Canadian

Pictured, NOT our Canadian. Image of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announcing the ban, via BBC.

“There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt”
-Warhammer 40,000
Also, Justin Trudeau, more or less

As you may have heard, Prime Dictator Justin Trudeau just banned an enormous list of guns here in Canada. Toronto, and points east, elected the Liberals to a Minority government in 2019, and the former Chief of Police for Toronto was right there, banging the gun control drum.

Toronto has a guns and gangs problem. Not compared to, say, Chicago, Los Angeles, St. Louis, or any of those other notorious spots with inner city violence. Toronto is a city of 3 Million people, and in the last fifteen years, 2005 and 2018 were the only two years where they had more than 50 people killed by gunfire.

[Editor’s Note: For reference, Chicago beat that in April… just April]

Well! (Hear that in an ‘aghast, offended Oxford British’ accent for maximum effect) That simply won’t do. 

Toronto’s stats are strange. For the ten years Bill Blair was their Chief, Toronto saw between 250 and 350 shootings, between 20 and 52 people killed. In the years since Blair retired, shootings went from 242 to 429 to 581 to 594 to 604. So yes, they are worse since he retired than they’ve ever been.

(Minor side rant about civil rights activists pushing back against proactive street checks by Toronto police deleted here by author. Google “Toronto Police Carding” for more.)

Clearly, the answer is to punish law-abiding Canadians for whatever went wrong after Blair left. (Hear that in Justin Trudeau’s smarmy, condescending tone for maximum effect, but make sure you insert half a dozen “ums” and “ahs” to get it right)

The latest tragedy the Liberals are going to wring for all its worth, is the scumbag who went on a rampage in rural Nova Scotia. (I firmly subscribe to the Some Asshole protocol, so I won’t be naming him here). In case your social-distancing includes not watching the news, like, ever, Some Asshole in a quiet, rural part of Canada’s Maritimes had a fight with his girlfriend at a beach party, attacked her, lit his house on fire, went back to the party, killed seven people there and shot a bunch more. He attacked more people, burned more homes, and evaded capture by using an imitation police car and imitation uniform. He shot one responding police officer, rammed Constable Heidi Stevenson, murdered her, took her weapons, and continued his rampage. Eventually, after a twelve hour shitshow of arson and murder, he was shot by an RCMP ERT member (SWAT).

Do you know what these firearms prohibitions the Prime Dictator has dictated would do to prevent such a massacre?

Sweet Fuck All. (Hear that in a ‘Fuck You Shoresey/Letterkenny’ accent, at maximum volume, for maximum effect)

People who go on murderous rampages, don’t care about licencing. They don’t care about storage laws, they don’t care about magazine capacities, they don’t care about classification and they don’t care about jail. We Know people who go on murderous rampages plan to die at the end. They are hateful, spiteful, and murderous, and they just want to set the new high score before getting zapped.

The Prime Dictator and his minions want to paint law-abiding Canadians with the same brush.

Canadian gun control means passing a safety course and a criminal background check to get your licence to purchase and own. Canadian gun control means Firearms Officers at CFP review every violent offense reported to the police to see whether the suspect is licenced, and suspending it until the allegations are resolved in court. Anathema to Americans, I know, but that’s how our system works.

Canadian gun control means, when Prime Dictator Trudeau says “there is no need in Canada for guns designed to kill the largest amount of people in the shortest amount of time”, you know he’s full of shit because we already have five-round rifle mag limits, machineguns and actual assault rifles are prohibited, and none of the murders in Toronto are being committed with rifles in the first place.

Canadian gun control means, when Prime Dictator Trudeau says, “you don’t need an AR-15 to bring down a deer”, you know he’s full of shit because AR-15s are Restricted and therefore cannot be used for hunting. (Not to mention, .223 is too puny a round for proper deer hunting anyways, which he would know if he’d ever hunted instead of being a part-time Point Grey Drama teacher with a trust fund and a penchant for playing dressup and blackface.)

Deputy Prime Dictator Chrystia Freeland said “This was one of our key planks in our election campaign, and we received a strong mandate from Canadians to act on gun control” at a time where the Liberal Party has minority status in Parliament. The Liberals lost their house majority status, so they have to work with their political opponents to get anything done, and that’s a terribly gauche thing for the Natural Ruling Party (their words, not fuckin’ mine) to have to do. Rather than pass legislation to criminalize a whole demographic of Canadians, they bypassed Parliament entirely, by just issuing an order. The order was not read in the house, voted upon, passed on to the Senate, reviewed, and then sent on to the Governor General to make it law. Not in the slightest. They just said, “Make it so” and so they did.

Prime Dictator Trudeau was famously asked in 2013 what other country he admired. The Dictator In Chief replied, “There’s a level of admiration I actually have for China because their basic dictatorship is allowing them to actually turn their economy around on a dime and say, ‘We need to go green … we need to start investing in solar.”

In this case, he’s dictating that peaceful, law-abiding Canadians will be criminalized for the sins of murderous assholes. Perhaps that Evil Twin goatee he’s sporting these days isn’t just a fashion statement, it’s a policy statement. 

Frozen Hoser

Man Attacks Cuban Embassy in D.C.

Image via The Times UK

A 42 year old man, currently a Texas resident, has been apprehended and charged with firing an AK rifle at the Cuban Embassy in Washington D.C.

Alexander Alazo is said to have fired about 30 rounds, a magazine, at the embassy at around 2am. The incident is being investigated as a hate crime, although it is unknown what type of hate crime. This may more accurately be terrorism by technicality if Alazo’s attack was directed at the Cuban government and was not racially motivated. The fact that the target was an embassy speaks to this being terrorism, not a hate crime.

Should it be punished? Yes. But we murky the waters with enough already to let this incident slip by mislabeled, if it is. Again, I say this looks politically motivated and if Alazo has any familial tie to Cuba it may well be. He also just might hate communists or the Castros and got it in his head to go do something stupid about it. He also might genuinely be a racist, but attacking an embassy is a strange manifestation of that when Caribbean Islanders and Hispanics can be found much closer to Texas than the Cuban Embassy in D.C. Or Florida, where he lived too.

This just smells like terrorism to me, an embassy is a representation of a foreign government. Poorly planned lone wolf terrorism, the equivalent of gangster style drive by on a house where you aren’t even sure who is home or what the objective of it really is so you’re just gonna dump the magazine at the place and drive on having delivered your ‘message’ of whatever it was.

Maybe Alazo will be forthcoming with a motive. If this was political that is more likely since the attack is then a statement of protest in some way.

UPDATE: BAN of 1,500 Firearms Effective Immediately…Canada to Ban 11 “Assault Firearms” by Name

Image via Google Search... couldn't see across Huron today so...

UPDATE:

Ontario, CANADA – Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced Friday that he was banning all “military-grade assault weapons” from his country.

“These weapons were designed for one purpose and one purpose only: to kill the largest number of people in the shortest amount of time. There is no use and no place for such weapons in Canada,” Trudeau announced, according to ABC News.

The Prime Minister said the ban went into effect right away and applied to 1,500 models of various guns.

“Effective immediately, it is no longer permitted to buy, sell, transport, import or use military-grade assault weapons in this country,” Trudeau said.Defense Maven

But none of the firearms were acquired legally. None, according to latest reports. Every single thing the Nova Scotia assailant did was illegal already. Which makes this next bit from iPolitics Canada even more rich to read. Hold on, this piece of Mensa level observation is going to blow your minds.

The RCMP is still investing how the Nova Scotia shooter acquired the guns that he used, but had the pending amendments of Bill C-71 been in place AND he had applied for a PAL, a past assault charge would have been flagged and prevented him from being able to buy a gun legally.iPolitics CA [emphasis added]

OMG! You mean if the RCMP obsessed lunatic who dressed up as an RCMP officer with a car to match, murdered a real RCMP officer and took her sidearm, illegally acquired all his weapons for this rampage and killing 13, and set fire to multiple structures burning another 9 people alive had instead followed the law and applied for a permit and this new rule had been in place from C-71 that he would have been denied the permit to purchase a gun!? And literally nothing else. Not jailed. Not charged with a crime. Just told he can’t buy a gun at the store.

I’m sure that means a whole hell of a lot to somebody somewhere.. but to anyone sitting here with a brain, the mental gymnastics on this particular stretch are just… impressive.

This is an earth shattering level of stupid on display. If Wortman had just followed the laws against not murdering people, C-71 wouldn’t even be necessary in the first place now would it?

Original Post Below

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has announced plans to put forward a ban on several firearms he and his administration consider “assault firearms” and he is using the Nova Scotia massacre to help do it. This resumes a campaign promise he ran on.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says the government will share details within days of its plan to ban what it has been describing since the fall election as “assault-style” firearms.GN Ca

Still no clear details on what firearms were actually used in Nova Scotia, it is known that the RCMP officer who was murdered had her sidearm and ammunition stolen and that nine of the twenty two victims were killed by arson, not gunfire. Reports I can currently find say that RCMP isn’t releasing details or that it was two “semi-auto rifles and two or ‘several’ handguns” during the 13 hours. The assailant, a middle aged denturist, had also gone to great lengths to impersonate and model his appearance as that of an RCMP officer.

Most recently, the gunman behind a horrific shooting spree in rural Nova Scotia used two semi-automatic rifles and several semi-automatic handguns.

And fire. Nearly half his victims were killed by fire. We must ban assault fire! Fire with dangerous features that allow it to kill so many people so quickly!

According to the linked CNN report Wortman, the killer/arsonist, may have illegally acquired firearms within the United States with one of them being described as “Military Style”, no word on whether that one or the stolen handgun from the murdered RCMP officer or any of the other non-military style firearms were responsible for the majority of the remaining 13 deaths. But I would be surprised if any other single source got to 9 like arson did.

Call me crazy, but I feel like a lot of that data matters if you’re basing a prohibition upon it. Was any firearm particularly deadlier than any other when wielded by a disguised unopposed lunatic? Especially in a society that opposes the notion of armed defense so much that it is an imprisonable offense if you use the wrong gun to save your life?

Some say the Prime Minister’s proposal has serious holes in it. It does, but we probably aren’t talking about the same thing..

A.J. Somerset, a former gunnery instructor with the Canadian Forces and gun policy expert, said he’s concerned the approach the government appears to be taking won’t be the most effective route.

Rather than adding certain types of guns to the list of banned firearms, Somerset says the government should amend the Firearms Act to prohibit guns based on their features — a move he says would prevent new models of guns similar to those banned from entering the market to take their place.

Elements are advocating for a New Zealand style ban on firearm types, not specific models that can be gotten around by name. This worked so well in New Zealand that they estimate about 56,000 guns (~30% of the estimated banned weapons in the country) were taken ‘off the streets’ and New Zealand is safe from all bad things ever. Unless someone hears about arson over there, I suppose.

“I don’t think it’s a very effective approach where if you contrast that with what’s been done in for example, in New Zealand. In New Zealand, they said any centrefire semiautomatic firearm with a detachable magazine will be banned,” he said.

“They made a very expansive definition. People might argue it was too expansive, but at least they defined the weapons to be banned in terms of their function rather than the approach that we’re taking, which is to ban specific guns.”

Somerset isn’t wrong there, for a rule to be effective at all it must have a definitive, clear, and enforceable context to work off of. What New Zealand won’t do is admit the total ineffectuality of the move because of the unenforceability of their design. Unless they are willing to conduct house to house confiscations, turn neighbor against neighbor, and risk all the hazards involved with that type of action, then there are still over 100,000 ‘assault firearms’ in New Zealand.

Imagine running a campaign and saying that you must eliminate venomous snakes, especially rattlesnakes and vipers, and you killed 56,000 snakes. You then declared your region safer from snakes because of your efforts, knowing full well 100,000 venomous snakes (at least) were still in the wild. Way. To. Go.

“But, Keith!,” you say. “That is no comparison at all! Snakes are a vibrant part of the ecosystem and have many positive benefits, you just have to be careful around them.”

Well if they can ignore every positive aspect of firearms ownership I can ignore every positive aspect of snakes.

New Zealand and anyone with similar legislation are relying on voluntary compliance, fractional voluntary compliance to be specific, to move the needle on their citizens safety. Maybe they can ask the criminals to just “take a break” too while they are at it.

Illinois Mandates Masks… But there is a problem

Retro Style Photo Of A Police Riot Barrier In Chicago, Illinois

Illinois Governor Pritzker signed an order mandating residents wear masks in public to help combat COVID-19 infections. This, from a purely medical standpoint, is a prudent move to curb infections. If you aren’t infected with COVID-19 or another URI type illness a mask will only provide a mild increase in infection resistance. However if you are infected, even asymptomatically, the mask protects very well against transmission.

It was one of the reasons you would occasionally see someone wearing a mask prior to it becoming the most desirable fashion accessory of 2020. It drastically curbs transmission probability.

Mandating masks for everyone going out means everyone uninfected, infected asymptomatic, infected mild symptomatic, and anywhere in between will reduce transmission. It’s good advice in this regard.

The problem…

Carrying a firearm in public while wearing a mask is a felony.

All of the licensed concealed carriers in Illinois are effectively prohibited from carrying, starting today. It’s a no win scenario at the moment. Carry your firearm and skip the mask, risk citation penalty and possible confiscation of your firearm because you were violating the Governor’s order which could be viewed as committing a crime (or at the least a civil infraction) while in possession of a firearm. Illinois never errs on the side of its citizens’ firearm rights so.. Or wear the mask and be prevented from carrying your firearm, your lawful constitutional right, and risk increased vulnerability during a charged and chaotic period in our national history.

Be denied a right you already had to buy-back with a permit, because of a technicality in the law that would make you a felon instantly if you obeyed the order and exercised your licensed right under Illinois law. The final option is risk the felony charge to comply with the Governor’s order and protect yourself as is your right and license allows. It’s a defacto carry ban by mixing two rules.

It’s the same kind of crap that making it illegal to have a firearm store within X00ft of a school or place of worship is. After your officials carefully measured out the whole jurisdiction and there is no spot within the jurisdiction that is X00ft away from any of those prohibited proximity locations. Looking at you on this one Cook County (IIRC)…

In short, I smell a lawsuit FPC style.

Vortex Switchview Throw Lever: The Mistake You May be Making During Install

Vortex is known to make a durable product that works well and uses quality parts. Recently a post came up on the internet about someone who installed a Vortex Switchview Throw Lever. During installation the screw to close up the lever snapped in two. Of course, the customer immediately went to calling the product cheap. Also immediately, a Vortex employee commented that he would replace it. The employee didn’t ask for reasoning or explanation, just immediately went to helping that customer out. Kudos to that employee, because this certain kind of break is often a user error during install.

The Mistake

The user often tightens the screw too tightly thinking that they need to close the gap on the lever. This causes the screw to be over stressed and snap. Tighter is always better right?

Wrong. Overtorque is a thing, and easier than people think.

Proper Install

The proper way to install the lever is to first, use the right allen wrench. The lever comes with a 2mm wrench. Tighten the screw just until the lever no longer slips on the ring, then a bit tighter for security. THERE SHOULD BE A GAP LEFT.

Correct installation of the lever

Placement for Efficiency

There are a couple of things you want to think about when indexing the lever.

If running a bolt gun, ensure that on your optics full magnification, all the way to the right, the lever does not hinder running the bolt.

If wearing any sort of gear on your body and the rifle being slung, ensure that nothing is pushing the lever when slung tightly causing it to go to a different setting of magnification.

Many often index it on the 9 to 3 o clock. Some the 10-4 o clock. Lay or stand on your gun (however you run it) and do some dry firing and adjusting of the magnification. Operate the gun as you would normally and feel what’s right. Try every magnification setting, as some have issues reaching to push the lever to the lowest setting.

Placement on a bolt gun

The Product Promise

Vortex throw levers are made in the great USA and are designed to break if too much force is applied, instead of your thousand dollar optic.

I have personally seen the testing and quality checks in house that go into checking EVERY piece of equipment. It is streamlined and literally every piece is inspected with care.

Vortex stands by their products and will replace items no questions asked. However, this does not mean you shouldn’t be taking care to install your products correctly.

So reach out to customer service. Companies like this deserve a good reputation. One “insignificant comment” can turn into a large group of people now having their mind set about a certain product. Especially if those people ignore the positive follow up.

https://vortexoptics.com/troubleshooting

The Food Supply Chain is Weaker Than We Thought

Bear with me here, because yet again I don’t have anything hot to report in the guns department. With everything going on and sewing masks in my free time, I haven’t managed a trip to the range in over two months. Heresy, I know.

But testing out a new holster when I’ve been wearing nothing but medical scrubs and pajamas for two months is not exactly rigorous research. That’s going to have to wait until I’m wearing real pants and belts again. So, let’s talk about something else…

This pandemic is teaching lots of people many different hard lessons. I’m one of those people who is trying to learn something new every day from this situation – and storing it for future reference.

One of the pandemic lessons I’ve learned in this mess is that the food supply chain is much more delicate than I had previously imagined.

It isn’t so much that food isn’t being produced – it is – in abundance. But the supply chain is apparently not flexible enough to allow a quick switchover from wholesale/bulk/commercial to individual consumer-based distribution. Being a relatively new prepper and not an economist or farm owner (I don’t even play one on TV), I had never even considered this angle before.

First it was milk being dumped.

Then it was livestock being slaughtered.

Then it was crops being plowed under or left to rot.

All because the supply chain was backed up or dried up because of lost restaurant and school food sales and packing plant closures due to illness.

This makes my inner frugal “waste not want not”  penny-pincher shudder. So much perfectly good food going to waste – all for want of a way to get it to market.

It sounds to me like it’s a good time for a systems revamp. Flexibility needs to be built into the distribution chains, with some inter-connectivity so that this doesn’t happen again. And don’t even get me started on the majority pork production being owned by a Chinese conglomerate.

In the meantime, it’s a good time to support your local agricultural community. My local farmer’s market has come up with an order online and drive-through pick-up system. Many of the farmers also allow an option to pick up at the farm yourself. Although it’s a little more expensive this way, the money goes back into the local economy rather than the corporatocracy. Because of the situation, even big store prices are going to rise, so it will probably end up as a wash eventually.

This week I splurged and bought free range chicken and a pen raised rabbit from the online farmer’s market. I’ve still got pheasant, boar, and venison in the freezer, but I wanted to support the local growers. 

I didn’t have any success this year small game “grocery shopping” by myself, but I did manage a really tasty squirrel pot pie out of some squirrel meat that was given to me. Now I need to look up rabbit recipes. Any suggestions?

I’ve also been working on expanding my gardening efforts – like everybody else.  I did buy some more frozen veggies when I could find them and dehydrated for long term storage. But I want to concentrate even more on growing my own. In true pandemic prepper fashion, I’m also trying to build a raised garden bed frame out of some old shelves I found in the office attic. The goal is to turn it into an experiment in “three sisters” growing.

Dehydrated bags of frozen broccoli to save freezer space.

Hand sawing hardwood is a fair upper body workout for this old gal (the wrists are holding up ok so far). That’s another “prepping skill” I’m working on – learning to use more hand tools. In the event of a “true” apocalypse, electric tools aren’t going to be of much use. Thus, a hand saw and an old school carpenter’s brace (hand drill) are my tools of choice for this project. I’m currently reading up on pilot holes.

I need to hurry up and finish this project because I want to plant the corn by next week or so.

Can anybody stand ongoing updates on pandemic gardening? How about pandemic patio furniture building? Maybe I can test how a holster retains a gun while I’m sawing 2×4’s in my back yard?? Sorry – I’m trying! :-)

Stay Safe Everybody!

WALTHER HEROES PROGRAM

As a way of saying “Thank you for keeping our country moving during these difficult times”, we are offering VIP Pricing to ALL First Responders, Hospital Personnel, and Essential workers for a Limited Time.

Program runs until May 25th, 2020.

What we need from you:  Credentials verifying you are an Essential employee. The Walther handgun models available for this Heroes Program can be found here.

WALTHER HEROES VIP PROGRAM FORM

Simply fill out the form in the link above and email it to heroes@waltherarms.com with your FFL and credentials.

*Offer is while supplies last. No backorders are available on these VIP guns.

The Saint Victor AR-10 Pistol – Review

What is not to love about taking a full-powered rifle cartridge like the 308 and shoving it into a AR-10 pistol? The AR-10 platform is an old one, but it is seeing a bit of a resurgence as of late. Maybe people are getting bored with AR-15s, or perhaps they bought all the AR-15s they can handle. Springfield has recently added a AR-10 pistol to heir lineup. The Saint Victor AR-10 pistol is the newest AR in the family, and Springfield was happy to send me one. 

The Victor lineup is a level above the average Saint and comes stock with a flat-faced nickel boron trigger, a free-floating M-LOK handguard, and typically BCM Gunfighter furniture. With the Saint Victor AR-10 pistol, the grip is BCM all the way, but there is no stock. Instead, we have an SBA3 arm brace. The SBA3 is by far my favorite AR-based brace. It’s a collapsing brace that allows for lots of adjustment, it’s comfortable regardless of how you use it, and it even has a sling point. 

Other changes from the Victor line is a lack of included iron sights. This gun is most certainly designed for a red dot optic. With that in mind, it seemed like an excellent chance to put the Meprolight Foresight to good use. 

An AR-10 Pistol? Why? 

As soon as the Saint Victor AR-10 pistol was announced, a lot of people were wondering why? Why does such a thing exist? 308 is a full-powered rifle round and does best from longer barrels. That’s an excellent question to ask. I may not have every answer, but I can say shooting a 308 caliber AR-10 pistol is a ton of fun. The fun factor is most certainly alive and well. It’s loud, it jumps and kicks, kinda like a super deadly baby. 

I could also see a good argument for this to be an outdoor gun. A hiking gun, one you keep on the ATV or side by side. It’s small and lightweight, so it’s easy to store, but also easy to carry without exhausting yourself. You still get the 308 power for stopping threats quickly with a lot more oomph than a 223 round. More oomph means you get a little more forgiveness on shot placement for coyotes, wild dogs, even bears. You also get a lot of penetration and some excellent expanding loads. 

Plus, like a handgun, it’s likely less restricted for carrying purposes than a rifle. That’s a bonus. It’s a big pistol, but still legally a pistol. 

Saint Victor AR-10 Pistol Ergonomics 

The ergonomics and controls are like every other AR-based weapon on the market. The magazine release, charging handle, and safety are all placed for easy and quick access. There is nothing different than a standard AR. 

What is different is obviously the size and weight of the weapon. The gun is 28inches overall with the brace entirely collapsed. That’s a compact weapon. The length with the brace extended to its max it is 30.5 inches. The gun is 8 pounds 6 ounces, which makes it a bit hefty, but still handy. The weight is centered since the weapon is so small, and this makes it easy to hold up for long periods of time. 

To the Range (with an Earsplitter)

Holy Crap is this thing loud! It also spits literal fire. What else can you expect from a 308 with a 10.3-inch barrel? There is quite a bit of powder left unburned, so you get a bright flash. The Saint Victor AR-10 pistol is equipped with a two-piece forward blast diverter, and it’s essential. It does an excellent job propelling the gas and blast forward. The blast and concussion does stay away from the shooter, which makes the weapon comfortable to fire. You just might want to double up on ear protection. 

Recoil is present, and you know you are firing a 308, but it’s not painful or distracting. Muzzle rise is the more significant issue with a double-tap pulling you up pretty high. It’s a weapon that would aim low to mag dump high. The brace does a decent job of providing a stable platform for aiming the weapon, and inside of 50 yards, you can be quite accurate with the brace strapped around your forearm. 

If you choose to misuse the brace is one way or another, you’d be able to step out well beyond that range, and the gun is impressively accurate. The Saint Victor AR-10 pistol is no DMR rifle, but hitting with proper torso shot placement is no issue at 200 yards. 

You’ll be punching the big holes in the little targets with a good optic and trigger time. Speaking of triggers, the Springfield Victor trigger is excellent. It’s very smooth, with roughly the same weight as a duty style trigger. The flat-faced trigger makes it easy to reach and gives you excellent control over the trigger. If you wear gloves while you shoot, you’ll also likely find the flat-faced trigger more comfortable. 

Does it Eat? 

Ammo has been hard to scrape up lately, so the good news is this gun got a wide variety of 308 to eat. This includes M80 ball, some 168 grain Armscor FMJs, and a handful of various hunting loads with ballistic plastic tips and soft point ammo. It had no problems eating anything I put through it. 

The 168 grain gave me the brightest fireball, so if you are after that there, you go. The M80 ball seemed to be the best for both mild recoil and flash. The gun comes with a PMAG, and the PMAG had no issues feeding any of the different types of ammo either. 

Big Round – Little Gun 

The Saint Victor AR-10 pistol most certainly has a real cool factor to it. It’s like a stout little fighter, the Gimli of ARs if you would. It’s a distinct weapon in both looks and feels, and it’s a ton of fun to shoot. It may have a niche use compared to most AR-10s, but that’s the same for any Warhammer. It’s not for everyone, but if it’s a gun that appeals to you, you should know it’s well made, accurate, reliable, and most certainly a lot of fun

 

All guns are always loaded: discussing the Four Rules of Gun Safety

We tend to talk about the “rules” of gun safety a lot, but when we have these conversations it’s often without context. For example, the first rule: All guns are always loaded, or how it’s often said “treat all guns like they’re loaded.”

The problem right off the bat with the first rule is that we don’t do that. Or if we did, we would never clean our guns, dry fire our guns, or repair our guns. It’s a fact that we quite frequently treat guns like they’re not loaded, and in fact need to be able to do this in order to function with those firearms in any kind of training or competition environment.

In this video, I argue that the phrase all guns are always loaded isn’t a dogmatic rule to be followed, but rather a guideline to get you to do some critical thinking about how you handle guns. This is important, because when people treat safety like dogmatic rules, they tend to shut their brains off and do what the rules say instead of thinking. This leads to complacency, which leads to accidents. Accidents are specifically the end state we want to avoid by having the four rules of gun safety, so instead of repeating the mantra, think about what the rule means.

For me, I interpret “all guns are always loaded” to mean “assume a gun is loaded until you verify its condition yourself.” Any time I make contact with a gun that’s been out of my control, I’ll verify its condition of readiness. When I put my carry gun on in the morning, I check the cylinders first to make sure it’s still loaded, which can be done with the gun in the holster. If I grab a gun out of my safe to dry fire with, I’ll check it to make sure it’s unloaded first. These are important things to do that help preserve both my safety and my readiness.

Instead of saying “all guns are always loaded,” use the four rules of gun safety as a guideline to start thinking about how we apply those rules to our daily lives.

We Are at War

(from njspotlight.com)

The world will never be the same.  People are out of work.  Factories are retooling to make equipment that we need to fight this war.  The President of the United States has declared an emergency in every state at the same time, which has never happened before.  No one really expected this.

We aren’t prepared for things like this to happen, are we?   The government can respond to something like this.  Industry can ramp up production quickly in response to something like this.  It won’t be so bad.  We’ve heard it all and more but do we realize we are at war?

 

We are at war with an enemy we fight every day but one that we have never before seen.  We are at war with an enemy so small that it takes an electron scanning microscope to see it but we see its effects all around us.  We are at war with an enemy so powerful it made the world close its doors, populations were ordered to stay inside, and many industries nearly ceased production.

The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) causes Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). It is the smallest enemy we as a world have fought together on such a large scale for a hundred years since the 1918 “Spanish Flu”.  We have had epidemics and World Wars, and men and women have died in great numbers, but nothing has brought the whole world to its knees like this has today.  No country or people go unaffected and many who are affected go unnoticed.

Others say we are not at war with this virus or even with the disease it causes.  They say that many will be infected but overall few will die.  That the cure is worse than the disease, so to speak.  That the economic havoc caused by shutting down the world will create more suffering and death than the disease and death that this virus will cause.  We don’t know that nor will we really ever be able to tell for sure.   Nearly every affected region has responded to the pandemic with restrictions in some way and so we have little to compare to.

One thing we do know is that people are dying and more will die.  People will die no matter what we do.  That doesn’t mean we do nothing or that at the first sign of reprieve we throw down our weapons.  This enemy has infiltrated the very ranks of our fighting forces, first responders and healthcare workers.  Hundreds have died attempting to fight this virus.  Hundreds who thought they were doing the right thing to help others. Hundreds who thought they were protected because they were using the personal protective equipment (PPE) they had been trained to use.  Maybe some didn’t have proper PPE because of the volume of patients they were seeing that might have been infected with the virus and supply could not keep up with demand.

Right now as healthcare providers who hold our civil rights in high regard, specifically the right to keep and bear arms, we see many of our rights being infringed upon.  We see government officials ordering that we limit our movement, our ability to make a living, our ability to associate with others and, yes, even our ability to keep and bear arms.  There is much we can do to fight back against this overreach of government control.

But I ask that we do so without sacrificing our and others’ health in the process.  Many people are protesting the stay at home orders in their state.  From what I see in pictures and video almost no one wore a mask.  Almost no one was practicing social distancing.  Michigan did it best by staying in their cars and creating a traffic standstill around the state capital.

How many of you had a month’s worth of food, water and toilet paper in your home?  How many of us had a month or more of savings available to live on?  How many of us were prepared?  We talk about preparation all the time in the RKBA community.  We talk about “pants on, gun on” and keeping our firearms in good working order.  We talk about how to handle, clean, shoot and store our firearm safely.  We talk about how to keep our family safe at home how to stay safe out in public.  We talk about sheltering in place in a bedroom or safe room if our house is broken into unless we have a family member elsewhere in the house.  We talk about not trying to “clear” our own home if we believe someone has broken in and we are in a safe place, in or out of our home.  Let’s take some of this advice into the current war.

We cannot see this enemy.  We need to take all the precautions that we can to avoid it. If we come in contact with it we do not know for sure what effect he will have on us.  We may walk away unscathed, have minor short lived injuries, be critically injured and survive, or we may die.   After we encounter this enemy we may unknowingly assist him in his campaign by spreading his forces among those we love and associate with.  Do we wish to be a traitor?

We have been told many things we can do to fight this war at this time.  Although the CDC is not our friend when it comes to firearms, but this time it really is a virus! This time the CDC does know what it is talking about, despite mistakes in not pushing testing early on.  There is no specific weapon against this enemy.  Avoidance is the best tactic. Most of us will eventually come in contact with it.  If we all come in contact with the enemy at once we will not be able to help each other when we get injured. The economic chaos we experience today will mount.

Use situational awareness: Avoid the enemy.  Stay at home when you can.  Work from home if you can.  If you must go out, avoid others, because you do not know who the unknowing traitors are.

Make personal preparation:  Update your EDC. Keep yourself healthy.  Get plenty of vitamins especially vitamin C, Zinc, D and others that help your immune system work well. Drink plenty of water; a half to a full gallon of water is a good place to start.

Get plenty of rest: If you’re off of your normal work schedule, don’t let your sleep get off schedule as well.  Good sleep hygiene will help your body fight this war.

Protect other civilians: This begins with “social avoidance”, which is really “virus avoidance. It includes wearing a mask when you go out.  This is more to protect others from what you don’t know you have, though it can help protect you from them.  Avoid others as much as possible.

Help the fighting forces: Don’t go to the doctor unless you have to.  If you think you need to be seen, call first.  Don’t just show up at a walk-in clinic, acute care or ER.  Most illnesses and injuries will heal themselves, but if you are concerned please call and discuss this with your primary care providers office first. They should be able to direct you to where you need to seek help if you do.  If you think you have COVID-19, stay home unless you have shortness of breath, chest pain or otherwise need to be hospitalized.  Again, call your doctor if you are concerned.

As Americans we can be united against this foe.  We can also speak out against governmental overreach and control in ways that still protect us and our fellow Americans.

.

.

Sean Brodale, MD

— Dr. Sean Brodale is a family practitioner in Iowa. He is pursuing the right to carry in hospitals for eligible medical personnel. At DRGO he is involved in membership and public engagement projects.

All DRGO articles by Sean Brodale, DO

The Jackson Mississippi Open Carry Ban

I was more focused on the Supreme Court case yesterday but thankfully I’m not alone in shaking my head at the Mayor’s decision and comments here. Colion Noir sums it up and breaks the Mayor’s broadcast down counterpoint by counterpoint

The shameless exploitation of the victims within his jurisdiction to further an agenda that in no way addresses the problem. Mississippi is a constitutional carry state. If you can legally own your handgun you can legally carry your handgun, the state places no legal barrier between an owner and a bearer.

Hmm, the right to keep and bear arms… how quaint a concept.

What the Mayor wants is stop and frisk, but he cannot call it that because that is a racially charged policing term. “Disproportionately targets individuals of color.” is I believe the legal parlance of choice when the backlash for the stop and frisk policy inevitably comes back. If you’re wondering, just look at New York’s Bloomberg and friends application of stop and frisk in that region of the country.

Existing in public isn’t a crime or probable cause of a crime. Existing in Jackson in public isn’t a crime or probable cause of a crime. Existing in public with your firearm, in Jackson or anywhere else, isn’t a crime or probable cause of a crime and under Mississippi law is perfectly permissible. You are allowed to carry your firearms.

Is Jackson’s Mayor assuming that any firearm seen, especially on someone of color, is probably illegal? Are the Black and Hispanic residents of the city, who make up its majority, all under suspicion because of their race?

We know. We know that homicide is heavily intra-racial, the FBI Uniform Crime Report lays that fact out year after year. Therefore a hispanic victim was probably killed by a hispanic perpetrator, a caucasian victim was killed by a caucasian perpetrator, and a black victim was killed by a black perpetrator. All of these are seen at rates over 80%. Victims and perpetrators are also disproportionately young, male, and criminally connected.

So what we are left to believe is that the mayor desires the power to treat every single one of his subjects.. er, citizens, as criminal for doing something they are legally empowered to do under state and federal law on the off chance that they actually catch a criminal. I’m sure there is no possible way that power could be abused.

A criminal with a visible illegal weapon is a really dumb criminal. Really dumb criminals do not remain associated with smarter criminals who want to keep their cash flow going. The preposterously few criminal agitators that could be picked up under a policy like this were never the great threat, they were the low hanging fruit and sheer dumb luck got them charged with something. Something that they will probably be released early from to go commit their next dumb offence.

Way to go mayor, you’re really thinking with your ‘big brain’ on this one..

US Supreme Court Dismisses New York Case as Moot

In a 6-3 vote today, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) handed a disappointing judgement on the New York handgun restriction and transportation case that was poised to give the Second Amendment a major victory.

Citing that New York amended their law already, the court decided not to rule on the egregious infringement, a ruling that would have put ridiculously overzealous gun control laws in jeopardy nationwide.

The rule, in case you forgot, basically amounted to the fact that a New York resident couldn’t transport a handgun that they already lawfully owned, and complied with all the other bullshit New York puts gun owners through just to buy one, outside city limits. This applied even to another piece of property that they owned. That’s correct, you, oh Big Apple resident, could not transport your handgun to your other house or property if it was outside the city, to say nothing of transporting it literally anywhere else.

This is the state that arrested an actively serving military member for having his issued magazines in his vehicle with him, so I’m not surprised by the absurdity of the rule. I was just looking forward to having new your finally get the constitutional smack on the rear they needed as Illinois and the East Coast watched, desperately clutching their own tender cheeks because they know they’re guilty too.

But SCOTUS has decided not to give us that satisfaction. I’m not surprised, I’m just disappointed. This is a purely political move to not make waves, it’s easier to let this fizzle out with the excuse that NY already corrected the deficiency than to rock the boat and put the gun control heavy states legal teams scrambling like mad at the cataclysm that could befall if SCOTUS ruled heavily against the precept, which they almost certainly would.

That’s what makes this a political move. Justices that sit more in the middle on the issue of Second Amendment freedoms aren’t forced to choose if they dismiss the case. Knowing which way they would have to choose with how heavy handed New York got this was the easy way out of the mess.

By a 6-3 vote, the justices said the case was moot because the law was repealed. But the ruling gave opponents a chance to go back to the lower courts and argue that the city nonetheless imposed new restrictions on gun owners who want to take their weapons outside the city to second homes or to practice at a shooting range.

Justice Samuel Alito, joined by fellow conservatives Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, said the court should have decided the case and declared the restriction unconstitutional.

With the nation on the brink of a truly terrifying financial crisis in many respects, caused by a medical crisis and widely varying opinions on the response, SCOTUS has declined to add this to the firestorm. It may be an overall fairly wise political move… but it is not one in alignment with the Constitution. The Court had the opportunity to declare in a decisive way that the States couldn’t just fetter their citizens rights as “reasonable restrictions” just because they all heart themselves some gun control.

Disappointing… truly disappointing.

VORTEX OPTICS TO OFFER 40% OFF TO MEDICAL STAFF

From the Vortex Team,

BARNEVELD, Wis. Before COVID-19, doctors, nurses, and frontline medical personnel were already heroes. After the outbreak, their bravery has been what we need to find hope in a troubling time

Vortex Optics would like to honor their courage and their commitment. For the next 60 days, from April 27 to June 26, frontline medical personnel get 40% off on up to two optics, up to two optics accessories, and up to five items of Vortex Wear apparel. They will also receive free shipping.

As America isolates at home, medical professionals have pushed to the frontlines to battle this unprecedented threat. Thank you for being the heroes we need.

To receive the discount, simply create an account on ExpertVoice.

About Vortex Optics: American-owned, veteran-owned, Wisconsin-based Vortex Optics designs, engineers, produces, and distributes a complete line of premium sport optics, accessories, and apparel. Built on over 30 years of providing unrivaled customer service and exceptional quality, Vortex® has emerged as a leader in the optics market.

The SIG Predator – A New Romeo5

In the late 1980s, an elite team of mercenaries was dispatched to Central America to engage a group of terrorist guerillas and their Soviet adviser. The team was successful, but only one man survived the mission. He, and his team, were unfortunately not equipped with the SIG Romeo5 XDR Predator sight. I’m not saying it would have made as big a difference as say.. modern thermals, but maybe they would have aimed their rifles from the shoulder instead of hip firing. For brevity’s sake, we are calling this optic the SIG Predator. -Top Secret AAR

The name, and my pop culture laden intro, are due to the fact SIG built a special edition of their Romeo5 XDR sight with a Predator inspired reticle. The XDR designation means you can utilize multiple reticles, and the SIG Predator has four reticles total. The most important is the 4th and final, which is the 12 MOA triangle only. It’s designed and modeled directly after the Predator’s own reticle.

The other reticles include a dot only, a dot with a line underneath it, a 12 MOA triangle with a dot in the middle, and the 12 MOA triangle mentioned above. The different options are nice, and from a practical perspective, the 12 MOA triangle and dot are likely the handiest. The dot allows for precise shooting, and the triangle provides for closer range speed.

The Power of the Triangle

The SIG Predator and its triangle reticles are undoubtedly unique. The choice to use the Predator reticle isn’t just cool looking. The triangle design is more substantial and quicker for the eye to pick up. The triangle design does allow for thin lines that are easy to see and easy to see in-between.

Is it better than a circle and a dot? It’s comfortable and easy for the eye to pick up. The 12 MOA triangle isn’t just for looks; it’s great for speed for extremely close-range shooting.

The best way to think about it is what range are you shooting at? Engaging targets from 50 to 200 yards? Use the single dot. The single dot does allow for the best precision red dots can offer. The small 2 MOA dot won’t cover much of the target at this range.

Am I engaging closer than that? Go with the triangle. This big 12 MOA triangle is perfect for fast target acquisition. You are essentially swapping from a 2 MOA dot to a 12 MOA triangle. The dot with the line underneath exists, but doesn’t seem to be incredibly useful.

Going Green With the SIG Predator

The SIG Predator does use a green reticle, which is different than the movie, but green is easier on both the eye and the batteries. The 12 MOA reticle is likely a battery drainer, and the green helps a bit.

[Editor’s Note: Most battery life estimates you see are at a moderate setting, on the dim side for daylight use, and if the sight has multi-reticle selection it is measuring power consumption of just the single dot. Instead of getting into the weeds of the math of power consumption and LEDs and all that… just change your battery every year and carry a spare for the range. Easy]

In outside conditions, the triangle reticle is just fine, but once you get indoors, the triangle reticle becomes a bit blurry. It’s usable, but I wished it was a little crisper for indoor use.

The SIG Predator has ten settings in total, eight daylight settings, and 2-night vision. The daylight settings are incredibly bright and more than enough for the brightest portion of the day. A single AAA battery powers the optic, and the battery will last for 50K hours.

To help preserve the battery, you get the MOTAC technology that powers down the optic after a period of zero motion. It will automatically power up when moved again. The SIG Predator will also remember your last setting when manually turned off and then on again.

Hitting the Jungle

Range time meant finding a gun that complimented the SIG Predator’s triangle reticle. I can get a dozen red dots with a plain dot reticle, so that doesn’t appeal to me. I went with the Micro Scorpion. It’s one of my favorite little subguns, and it’s built for close range, so the 12 MOA triangle is perfect for 50 yards and closer.

Zeroing is simple. The uncapped turrets are easily accessible, and SIG gives you a handy little tool to make adjustments. It’s worth keeping in my shirt pocket. Zeroing was done at 25 yards. I find this range perfect for PCCs, especially guns like the Micro Scorpion. I used Barnaul Silver Bear ammo, and it performed remarkably well and was much cleaner than I expected. Thanks to Barnaul for providing the ammo. 

Even in the height of Florida’s spring, the reticle was more than bright enough to be easily seen. At the highest brightness level it was uncomfortable, so I backed down two levels.

Once it was zeroed, I did a few simple snap drills, failure to stop drills, and worked from behind cover, as well as sprinting to cover and shooting a select drill. The big ass 12 MOA triangle is quite quick and easy to get on target.

I shot a 1.32 failure drill from 15 yards. At 25 yards, that big triangle gave me a .84 snap drill on target. The big triangle makes a big difference when it comes to getting on target rapidly. Backing off to 50 yards, I could still see the 10-inch gong and hit it without issue.

Does the triangle offer value over a traditional dot, or even the other XDR with a circle-dot? I think so, but mostly at close range. The ability to swap to a dot only allows you to max out the range as well, at least max out your red dot range. The SIG Predator does seem to be the perfect red dot for something like the Micro Scorpion, or other small subguns.

Just a Reticle?

The SIG Predator and the Romeo5 XDR series are robust, and affordable optics. This particular model does offer you a new reticle option, and that reticle option does give something more than a cool and silly gimmick. It’s a useful close range reticle that will get you on target quite quick within 50 yards or so. The ability to swap to a simple dot does allow you to open up your range and precision potential with something like a AR 15.

This little guy is shockproof and waterproof with an IPX-7 rating for submersion. The controls provide tactile and audible feedback. The built-in mount is sturdy and locks on tightly to a Picatinny rail. All the little things add up to a well made and very affordable red dot optic. This is my second XDR, and I’ve been more than happy with both purchases.

The additional Predator reticle has made the SIG Predator my favorite of the two admittedly.