Advertisement

Black Collar Arms Forged Carbon Fiber Components

These.. actually look neat. I’m hoping they will quickly add higher mounts for AR-type rifles. But for a light hunting gun, this can save even more weight. I’m curious what the surface engagement numbers are like and the comparable tension on the optic itself compared to aluminum.

Austin, TX (09/07/2020) — Originally developed as a joint effort between Lamborghini and Callaway Golf Company, the forged carbon fiber process can produce complex shapes one-third the weight of titanium, yet stronger. Partnering with manufacturing company McVick, Black Collar Arms is excited to bring the world of forged carbon fiber components to a firearm near you.

Available first are Forged Carbon Fiber One-Piece Scope Mounts in 30mm and 34mm ring sizes. Despite weighing in at a scant 5.2 ounces, these forged carbon fiber scope mounts are as stiff and rigid as if they were machined from steel (three times stiffer than aluminum!) with just 1/6th the thermal expansion of aluminum.

These are the most rigid scope mounts on the market and maintain flawless zero in any condition. As if the gorgeous carbon fiber aesthetic wasn’t enough!

Forged Carbon Fiber One-Piece Scope Mounts are the first in an upcoming line of forged carbon fiber components currently being designed by Black Collar to be manufactured by McVick exclusively for Black Collar. Expect further optic mounting solutions plus other accessories and components, including AR-15 parts.

Quality is extremely high, but current production capacity is low. Mount availability will be rather limited with small batches arriving at Black Collar weekly while we gradually invest in increasing capacity.

Despite the limited and exclusive nature of the Forged Carbon Fiber One-Piece Scope Mounts and their physical advantages over aluminum mounts, not to mention their drop-dead gorgeous looks, MSRP is in-line with other premium scope mounts.

More information can be found at: https://blackcollararms.com/product/forged-carbon-fiber-one-piece-scope-mounts/

About Black Collar Arms

Based in Austin, TX, Black Collar is dedicated to creating innovative and functional firearms and components. The Pork Sword Chassis forged the market for minimalist, modular firearm chassis and the Pork Sword Pistol is now headed to a dealer near you. There’s a lot more to come from Black Collar, so stay tuned!

Questions, feedback, concerns, or naughty pics to share? Email our boy Jeeves at manservant@blackcollararms.com or find us on InstagramFacebook, and www.BlackCollarArms.com

I’ve never seen this take on an optic mount…

scopes are not supposed to move like that from r/DiWHY

scopes are not supposed to move like that from r/DiWHY

I thought I was going to take Labor Day off folks… But I had to share this piece of utterly baffling GUnMSMIFery..

This marvel of.. something that isn’t engineering but it stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night.. comes from reddit and I have never experienced the like. It isn’t even a Brandon Herrara cursed gun image, it just impresses you with the sheer persistence it took to put a scope permanently onto the bolt of this rifle.

There are some rotating bolt manual rifle designs that would technically allow for this sort of situation, they have a portion of the assembly that doesn’t rotate. The mounting of an optic onto that portion could, I suppose, make sense to someone who doesn’t understand the job of the bolt assembly. I’m just surprised it made it into a working (at least closing) assembly.

So.. marvel with me readers.. just marvel.

L85/SA80A1 Irons and Zeroing

Yes, English firearm enthusiasts do exist and Bloke on the Range is one such gentleman. Here he has borrowed an actual factory semi-automatic L85/SA80A1 (Yes, the goofy one with all the ergonomic issues that H&K later fixed).

I’ve said it before, the A1 was unfortunately put together but a group with good intentions and no experience. The team didn’t know the problems that a rifle in the field faces, a rifle that needs to work under harsh environmental conditions and be built to fix errors in its operations at the operator level.

Little things like snow or dirt pack behind the trigger and a charging handle that can be grabbed and ripped quickly by the user. Protection for the magazine release so that it does get hit inadvertently, little things like that.

But anyhow, it is fascinating that we could’ve potentially gotten an SA80 at least as an interesting collectible here in the states because a semi-auto did exist. I don’t think we can rely on someone like Tom Bostic to tenaciously Americanize this one like he did with the G36. But who knows, I never though we would have domestic G36’s.

P220 Legion Carry SAO

“That just sounds like a 1911 Commander with extra steps…”

Shush! Hater. But you’re not necessarily wrong. They key here isn’t whether or not you want a nice single action single stack .45 ACP, of which there are many fine examples, it is that you want the that P220 Frame and Gray Guns trigger.

I own two Legion pistols and am toying with the idea of picking up two more, I like the line that much. When it works it works.

From Sig Sauer

The P220 LEGION Carry SAO is an enhanced version of the gun that started it all for modern day SIG. Finished in a proprietary LEGION gray coating and featuring custom G-10 grips with a Legion medallion, the P220 Legion is improved in nearly every way. Now featuring our highly sought after SAO Trigger and Manual Safety, the stainless-steel slide sports SIG SAUER Electro-Optics X-RAY high visibility day/night sights as well as front cocking serrations that provide greater purchase for cycling the action, clearing the firearm or conducting press checks.

The P220 LEGION Carry SAO includes a reduced and contoured Elite beavertail, which allows for a higher grip and a reduced profile, thus eliminating printing. More aggressive front strap checkering and additional checkering under the trigger guard enhance the grip. An X-Five undercut has been applied to the trigger guard, allowing for a higher grip and greater control. The P220 Carry LEGION SAO ships with three 8-round magazines.

Back to GAT

With 9mm being priced to high heaven .45 ACP might be the (more) affordable and available option. Combine that with the increased comfort of single stack pistols and Legion may be the fitting option. Personally, I think I want a 10mm.

Alvin York & the U.S. Gun Culture that Saved Europe

[Ed: This excerpt from Dr. Faria’s book America, Guns, and Freedom: A Journey Into Politics and the Public Health & Gun Control Movements was first published July 31 at GOPUSA.com. Minimally edited for DRGO.]

Europeans like to decry violence in America, calling it “America’s gun culture” while forgetting their share of political mayhem in their own house, including violence perpetrated by Jihadists as well as their own left-wing terrorists. But I enjoy reminding them that it was America’s “gun culture” that liberated Western Europeans from the Nazis during World War II and subsequently also protected all of free Europe from the Red Army and the rolling Soviet tanks during the Cold War. Moreover, I also like to remind them that as pusillanimous Europeans they may require further protection from the U.S. “gun culture” in the future!

I also like to explain to them that it has been because of the protection afforded by the American “gun culture” that Europeans have been able to create and sustain in peace the social and economic “safety nets” of which they are so proud.

I don’t put them down to offend them. I proceed with a little history and another concept that progressive gun prohibitionists are unable to grasp about America’s “gun culture,” and that is that while it’s true that many Americans, particularly in rural areas and most of the South, grow up around guns and hunting that salutary tradition of the outdoors reinforces Americans inherent patriotism, a patriotism and outlook that Americans inherited along with a legacy of freedom.

The story of Sergeant Alvin York (photo) is illustrative of how America’s experience in the outdoors, self-sufficiency, hunting, individualism, and cultivation of the “gun culture” can forge character. York grew up in a large and poor family in the Appalachian Mountains of Tennessee. Because they depended on hunting for food, York got very adept in shooting wild animals, such as turkeys and squirrels, with precise shots to the head as to save the rest of the animal for eating.

At age 27 to gain the heart of his sweetheart, a deeply religious girl, York joined a fundamentalist-Methodist sect and made a pacifist commitment to Jesus. In 1917, as World War I raged, York was drafted and because his church was not officially pacifist, he was denied conscientious objector status. He went through basic training but continued to object to war. Because of his obvious sincerity, the major general in command of his unit, George E. Buxton, spoke with him, cited Scripture, and pointed out that Jesus commanded his apostles to carry swords, reminding York that “earthly kingdoms do fight wars and that Christians should render to government the things that are Caesars.” Buxton also cited Ezekiel 33:1-6 in which God exhorted the Prophets to command the people to listen to the watchman’s trumpet warning of an approaching enemy.

After much soul searching and not completely convinced, Alvin York was sent to France in October 1918. Promptly, his division, already separated from the rest of the army, was sent to rescue the “Lost Battalion” (the 1st battalion of the 308 Infantry Regiment) that was surrounded by German units. Pvt. York, leading a patrol, surprised the enemy camp, killed one German, and the rest surrendered. Another German unit opened machine gun fire from a nearby hill, killing or wounding nine Americans. With his Enfield rifle, York picked off the German gunners one by one. Before he could reload the rest of the Germans, out of ammunition, attacked with a bayonet charge. York stopped them with the lethal fire of his .45 caliber pistol, ordering them to surrender, which they did.

York, with the seven Americans still alive, rounded up several dozen German prisoners. On the way back to American lines, he captured two other groups of Germans, who he “bluffed into surrendering.” In all, Alvin York had captured 132 Germans, including four officers.

In his book, The Morality of Self-Defense and Military Action: The Judeo-Christian Tradition (2017), David B. Kopel summarized York’s additional personal achievements: “Almost single handed, York with his one rifle and one pistol, had killed 25 Germans, and knocked 35 German machine guns out of action. The next day, he returned to the site of the battle, to pray for the soul of the slain Germans. Pvt. York was promoted to sergeant. The French commander Marshall Foch called York’s feat the greatest accomplishment of any soldier in Europe.” From the Great War, Sergeant York returned to the U.S. an American hero, “representing the simple, honest, and faithful ideas of the old America.” He was recognized with the Medal of Honor.

Many Americans in the 21st century still cling to their guns and their Bibles, and it stands to reason that the alleged “gun culture” mentality and patriotic outlook may not be gained solely by an 8-week army basic training boot camp. Life experience, patriotism and the attitude to fight along your fellow soldiers in a just cause — such as freedom and a country’s way of life — do not appear in a vacuum. If that were the case, European democrats would have been a more formidable force against Hitler and Nazi Germany and would not have been so easily conquered in World War II. Belgians, Danes, Dutchmen and even Frenchmen, may have had weapons and adequate training, but the Germans in World War II had no difficulty in conquering and taming them. The Swiss with a similar outlook as Americans and with their own gun culture were left alone.

America’s gun culture gave the Allies the edge, just as Stalin’s “Patriotic War” stimulated Russians to fight for their motherland, and to make sure they did so the NKVD’s SMERSH units (Soviet military police and counter-intelligence units) were everywhere behind the front lines to stiffen Soviet fighting resolve if their morale lapsed. Americans did not need such units to make sure they fought.

And yet progressive anti-gun zealots want to disarm Americans and turn us into vacillating pusillanimous Europeans, like the Dutch and the Belgians. The fact is Europeans need to stop criticizing our “gun culture” and seriously beef up their own security via NATO. Americans are getting tired of paying taxes to protect Europe, maintaining bases, and sending our boys there, especially when the European Union (EU) continues to globalize and socialize, while criticizing our nation and unique culture — all the time ignoring the mess in their own backyard.

.

.

faria-13wmaz-sml

—  Miguel A. Faria, Jr., M.D. is a retired professor of Neurosurgery and  Medical History at Mercer University School of Medicine. He founded Hacienda Publishing and is Associate Editor in Chief and World Affairs Editor of Surgical Neurology International. He served on the CDC’s Injury Research Grant Review Committee.

All DRGO articles by Miguel A. Faria, Jr., MD

The Battle Rifle’s Future is 6.5mm (6.8mm)

What was old is new again… I wonder sometimes what the small arms landscape would look like if we hadn’t had the 7.62 NATO ‘Dark Age’, for lack of a better term. Not disparage .308 overly much, it’s great round in its own right but it exists because the U.S. Army couldn’t let 30-06 go after it “won” World War II. It was a cartridge that ended up in a rifle (the M14) that we already “knew” (should have known) was entering the twilight years.

Back in 1945 the Brits developed the .280 “7mm” cartridge that they would use in the EM-2 Bullpup. FN in Belgium also liked the cartridge and the FAL was designed around it. The Spanish CETME rifle used an “8mm” variant originally before the Germans turned it into the 7.62 NATO G3, Which the CETME later ran a reduced power 7.62×51 Spanish load. Similar to what was done from 10mm until it became .40 S&W.

In short, the 7.62 NATO was never a very good idea. It was just a workable one and since the US was riding high on the WWII and Korea rifle combat reports they absolutely refused to not use a .30 caliber with 30-06 type performance.

All the research saying what infantry needed was something like the Germans had come up with in the STG 44 be damned! The Germans lost! The M1 Garand won! (And the BAR, Thompson, 1903, M3, M1 Carbine, etc. But bugger all those..)

So, because the US led NATO, the US got their .30 caliber… and it lingered a long time in the “we’ve always done it this way” sort of sense. Mostly because it wasn’t a bad caliber. It just wasn’t great anymore either, and we had spent a lot of time and effort stocking for it. But you can’t lie to yourself forever, and when your sniper rifles are being out sniped and your shooters end up being more comfortable and efficient with their ‘other than’ 7.62 combat rifles, whether shooting heavy grain 5.56 or 6.5 Creedmoor, it was time to say “Hmmmm what if we went with a true intermediate caliber and a high efficiency projectile…?”

Europe collectively went, “Boy, this sounds familiar doesn’t? I wonder if somebody *they all look at the UK* maybe brought up this idea before?”

Now in 2020 the 6.5 Creedmoor has cut a swath into both the bolt gun and gas gun markets and with a winning recommendation from SOCOM on top, who have scooped up several small batch examples. Data indicates the lower mass lower recoiling round outperforms the 7.62 NATO in every way. The only things keeping it in ‘Gucci’ precision rifle circles instead of mainstream fighting rifles were cost per round being higher than .308/7.62 and nobody was really looking for a ‘new’ battle rifle.

Until suddenly we were, not just little batches of toys for SOCOM like the 300BLK rifles/uppers and new 6.5 Creedmoor M110’s, but the whole US Army.. with the US Marines following the data and making comments and recommendations based on their mission profiles. SOCOM providing direct help as well.

It’s not a coincidence that this little guy, while chambered in the stated 6.8mm (.277 Fury, huh.. “.280” was actually .276.. funny how that happens), can also be chambered in the legacy 7.62 and 6.5 Creedmoor (the proven new contender in both SOCOM and civilian shooting circles). In fact SOCOM is involved in the NGSW program as the key 6.5 data source since they actively use it operationally and are the sounding board to see if 6.5 might be the better round over the three 6.8 variants being tested. The biggest question on this front will be if 6.5 can meet the ‘near peer/future development’ body armor penetration requirements with an ‘A1’ type projectile of solid copper and hardened steel that came about out of the Army’s “6.8mm” submission requirement.

The Marines, as an aside, are already playing with the new SIG GMPG in .338 NM which is seeking to drastically upgrade the abilities of what easily portable machine guns can do. If successful the FN MAG M240 might finally begin to retire. We also might see a belt-fed back in the automatic rifle position.

In short, the theory that the Brits came up with in 1945 and we here in the US rejected because, “mA .30 cAliBER!” and then we rejected the rifles in favor of “mUh GrrAnd but with a MaGazinee!” is back and with a mountain of additional data. Not to say the Brit’s .280 was perfect out of the gate but these new rounds all seem to be curiously close to where they ended up in their development cycle.

The 6.5 (and it is assumed the 6.8 too, at least the SIG variant) do much better efficiency wise in shortened barrels than the 7.62 NATO, they retain advantages, lose less velocity at the muzzle, and most importantly lose less velocity in flight. SIG’s rifle being a 13″ barreled carbine, giving it the familiar profile of the M4 and Mk17, shows an understanding that sizing for mobility remains a priority.

Speed is a powerful tool in projectile weapons. It’s among the reasons why 5.56, even in shorter guns, overtook 9mm for CQB. But when we are talking about any significant amount of distance keeping that speed on is vital.

We’ve found that making the 5.56 efficiently, longer and heavier, we could close the range envelope we just always assumed 7.62 had on 5.56. Making 7.62 more efficient with longer and heavier projectile didn’t grant the same returns and we pretty much maxed out at 800 meters with both. Sure the 150-175 gr hit harder than the 77gr at that distance but both could hit. 6.5 goes further easier, 6.8 does (should by design) also.

7.62 NATO has been moved to a trainer round for snipers moving forward, in part for range safety and in part because it isn’t that good and forces the sniper to do the work. They’re using to because of its limited efficiency.

So, all that said and depending upon the results of the NGSW trials over the next couple years, I expect .308 to do a slow fade and 6.5 Creedmoor to eat that place at about the same rate. If Brownell’s starts selling the ‘Barrel’ again it may well have a 6.5 option.

But we won’t see ammo for anything come back for a minute yet, sadly… thanks 2020.

Review: ‘Gun Control Myths’ by John R. Lott, Jr, PhD

(from crimeresearch.org)

Doctor of Economics John Lott, Jr. is the expert on gun research because he’s done most of it. His Crime Prevention Research Center is the central repository of answers to all questions about the wrongness of gun control and how in truth guns save lives.  More Guns, Less Crime (his classic introduction) and his previous book The War on Guns are the perfect foundations for Gun Control Myths—together these form a compendium that addresses most of the fraudulent claims that have been made about how guns surely (but don’t) cause “gun violence”.

I know Dr. Lott, and believe me, he’s no Dan Quayle. He’s the real thing—an ultra-conscientious researcher who makes all his data public, willingly considers criticism, and addresses newly published research by others as well as conducting his own projects to add to our knowledge base. This behavior is exactly opposite to that of nearly all other gun-related researchers, who often for not-so-good reason obscure their data, use skewed analyses, and achieve their preferred results.

In Gun Control Myths he doesn’t attempt to cover every misleading idea about guns, but has chosen to address the biggest issues of today. He begins by correcting the errors of several of the seemingly comprehensive summaries in circulation about the dangers of gun ownership. He moves on to thorough discussions about mass shootings, which are so preoccupying although very rare and more often than the media reports, ended by good guys with guns.

There has been too much manipulative politicization for far too long about guns used badly by criminals and psychopaths. In addition to correcting media misreporting, Lott points out the FBI’s “political biases [and] corruption” beginning with the Obama administration that have not been fully rooted out. This reflects worry about many levels of government picking winners and users in how they interpret laws that blatantly infringe on citizens’ “right to keep and bear arms”.

Lott is admirable in accepting no organizational funding, which leaves the non-profit CRPC running on a shoestring compared to Bloomberg and blue state millions pouring into generating anti-gun studies every year. Thankfully, the excellence of CRPC’s work continues to win on quality if not quantity.

Do you value graphs and tables? There are scores and scores, from both sides of the “debate” as he shows there’s really none. How about footnotes? There are hundreds. Appendices? Six, over 17 pages and online. John Lott leaves no room for misunderstanding at any level of inquiry.

It would be nice to refer to an index, which is absent. However, that’s a minimal issue because the chapters are clearly focused on particular topics, which makes it easy to find a specific item or reference again.

There’s no question that, as Lott concludes, “the reality is that an armed citizenry is as necessary as it’s ever been.” And given the threats lined up against our staying rightfully armed, we must arm ourselves with the facts to oppose the false “truthiness” of the anti-gun movement.

John Lott again gives us the ammunition we need.

.

.

Robert B Young, MD

— DRGO Editor Robert B. Young, MD is a psychiatrist practicing in Pittsford, NY, an associate clinical professor at the University of Rochester School of Medicine, and a Distinguished Life Fellow of the American Psychiatric Association.

All DRGO articles by Robert B. Young, MD

Mantis-X Update! – Elite Marksmanship Course

Ammo prices suck.  Dry fire practice rocks – especially if you use a MantisX.

And it just got better with the brand-spankin-new Elite Marksmanship Course (as a free app update, of course)!  It will test you mercilessly.

Make sure you have the latest version of the app, go to the “Train” tab and scroll down to the bottom for all the goodness. Take a long “lunch break” or declare a “family emergency” or just keep “working from home” – you’ll want to get crankin’ on this one right away.

Yes, there is the Basic Marksmanship Course.  Do it.  Then do the Advanced.  Each course completion gets a nifty, real-life patch you can put on anything to let those who know, know.  And we send it to you for free. You can’t get the patch any other way.  Guaranteed to create envy.

Note: all of our products help shooters improve more rapidly.  Learn about all the new MantisX models here, then take your pick.  If you have an older model, we have a VERY generous trade-in program.

Train on,
Team Mantis
Learn More
https://mantisx.com/

The State of Magazine Bans

Buy more. Yes, you.

Yesterday, New Jersey’s ban on High Capacity Magazines was upheld by a 3-1 vote in the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. In contrast to the recent fall of the California ban, the New Jersey one has currently been upheld. The California AG has filed a petition for review to try and keep the ban in place, they are not going quietly back to liberty and giving up their control over their citizen’s second amendment rights.

The state, NJ, defended the law, which exempted active military and police officers as well as retired police officers, by arguing that it could save lives by forcing a mass shooter to pause to reload.

Read More: NJ gun control measure upheld again by federal judges 

As we know, that’s utter fiction.

The idea that the need to perform a function, reloading, that can be done in the span of a couple seconds (2 seconds is almost always the training standard for firearms with a last round stop in their action) will lower casualty counts of an unopposed shooter ignores the complex realities of a violent attack. The Virginia Tech shooting was done with capacity limited handguns, it did not limit casualties.

The concepts show a total lack of understanding combined with a willful resilience against being educated on the topic and the nuances involved. They don’t want to see, so they don’t. It’s like trying to tell them that not all fires can be put out with water and them stubbornly maintaining they can because every fire they’ve personally heard of was put out with water.

Magazine limit supporters can’t see that a home or self defender, which is an opposed use of force incident, benefits from a standard capacity magazine and is hindered by a limited capacity. In contrast, an active shooter is an unopposed use of force incident, the person doing the killing is not hindered or limited by a magazine capacity restriction because there is no force in opposition to them that is of great enough threat for it to matter.

For the length of time a reload takes, or any sort of stoppage of the gun, to positively influence the attack’s outcome the active shooter must be under direct immediate threat from a roughly equivalent opposing force, usually someone with a gun who can use it. So the supposition from New Jersey is ignorant wishful thinking and is being upheld because… Federal judges concluded that the law does not violate the Second Amendment because it does not prohibit possession of firearms or “effectively disarm individuals or substantially affect their ability to defend themselves.” Judges also noted that the law does not limit the number of magazines that a person can own.

So weak logic in the law and equally weak and vague logic to support the law. The perception bias problem we face is that the best educated people on the subject are staunchly pro-gun, which creates the perception that information being delivered is biased pro-gun regardless of the information’s accuracy. The short version of a very long and complex data stream is that an active killer incident is too complex to influence with a measure like a magazine ban. Too many other factors increase or decrease the lethality and injuriousness of the incident for a ban to matter. But it sounds good if you don’t think about it.

The entire theory of a capacity limit rests on the supposition that a perfectly placed unarmed individual who manages not to receive a critical injury will be able to see and react to an active killer reloading a firearm and work to incapacitate them. It’s the same thing as telling your co-workers, employees, or constituents, “In the event someone is trying to murder all of us, don’t worry because guns jam sometimes and we might be able to get the shooter then. If we’re lucky.. and they don’t have another gun.. and someone noticed it jammed.. and they don’t fix it.. and there are only one of them.. and one or more of us are strong enough and uninjured in order to incapacitate them.. and if they don’t have any other effective means of killing like a bomb or something.. and at least one or more of us are perfectly willing to take one for the team to try this.. and.. and yeah this is the stupidest rule.”

The capacity limit does negatively influence self defense, because self defense is opposed force. Capacity limit sets up a direct and deliberate failure point for a firearm someone is using against an unknown number of, voracity for violence of, and disposition of deadly assailants. It is saying to the person under attack, “You have X many tries, then you’re fucked. Good luck.” and then those same folks saying that are certain to exempt themselves and their security. If it worked wouldn’t they not need an exemption?

BE Meyers: Laser vs Laser

As the media has shifted away from the riots and public disturbances those in blue are still very much involved. Crowds are continuing to use illegal lasers against officers. To counter that, LE agencies are now employing the B.E. Meyers & Company GLARE RECOIL and GLARE HELIOS.

https://nypost.com/2020/08/04/federal-officers-in-portland-suffered-113-eye-injuries-from-lasers-dhs/?utm_source=NYPFacebook&sr_share=facebook&utm_medium=SocialFlow&utm_campaign=SocialFlow&fbclid=IwAR3mev77F2NShfq5ZuUsbByS6n8gFzHNosHXYYGHj9smen6vSKj-1cca4Ho

The Tactic: Black Bloc

History repeats itself does it not? In the late 1970’s during the civil unrest in Berlin the tactic “Black Bloc” took the stage. This is a method of a large group of protesters dressing in all black with black masks to ensure that no individual identification can be made. Here we are in 2020. Aggressors are burning precincts, beating people, and shining illegal lasers into officers eyes.

and again..history repeats itself. Hong Kong in 2019..

Counter Measures

Identification of Agitators

So how do we counter the tactic of ‘Black Bloc’ and identify those aggressors? The B.E. Meyers GLARE RECOIL and GLARE HELIOS. A video going around the web shows an officer employing the GLARE HELIOS from a rooftop. The officer shines the laser from above directly onto the agitator. This will show officers on the ground who to pay attention to and detain. If the individual is not detained and chooses to leave, that officer can still use the HELIOS to identify the individual no matter the distance ensuring that person is detained.

Immediate stop to those Injuring Officers

A large issue that is still ongoing is officers being injured by facilitators shining illegal lasers directly into officers eyes. This can cause temporary and permanent damage. BE Meyers equipment is being used to counter that. Targeting the facilitators with the Glare Helios takes their attention away from the officers on the ground and towards the officer on the roof. It also immediately stops an agitator from shining officers on the line when shined directly at that individual. A Seattle PD officer, a department that has been using the BE Meyers equipment since 2016, recounted a situation of similarity. The officer, who won’t be named, stated that a woman using a strobe light against officers was targeted with the GLARE HELIOS and immediately stopped harassing the officers. She then walked off the line and did not return.  Several other rioters with high power red, green, and blue lasers targeted officers on the line as well as the officer on the roof.  

A screen from a video showing facilitators shining lasers a the SPD officer on a roof.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Seattle/comments/gyiy6f/spd_is_arresting_people_for_using_laser_pointers/
A screen grab showing the SPD officer using the GLARE HELIOS as a counter measure against the individual shining a laser. This immediately stopped the agitator from continuing what they were doing and identified which individual was shining it.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Seattle/comments/gyiy6f/spd_is_arresting_people_for_using_laser_pointers/

These individuals were engaged with the GLARE HELIOS and either immediately left the area with some being arrested on their way out and/or were shielded by the other protesters with umbrellas. The SPD officer stated that the protesters tried to continue engaging the officers but were virtually ineffective due to the HELIOS. The HELIOS acts, in layman’s terms, as a large green sun. Using the GLARE beam envelops the entire indivudual and does not allow them to aim their lasers. If the agitator continues to engage the officer while leaving the HELIOS will continue to be used no matter the distance eventually causing that agitator to again leave or be detained.

Facilitators have also been seen shining illegal lasers and lights into cameras around federal buildings. This is another reason that these facilitators need to be identified and stopped.

Below is a video of Antifa protestors shining lights into the faces of a small group of people trying to walk away from the mob.

https://mobile.twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1294901716853198850

How do the GLARE HELIOS and GLARE RECOIL work?

The Patented SmartRange Safety Control is what makes this equipment a safe and effective way to counter the aggressive laser activity towards officers.

The Arrests

An important thing to bring up in relation to this topic is that these facilitators and aggressors are being charged for their crimes days and weeks later if not arrested at the scene. Our Agencies are showing that these crimes will not be tolerated. Whether it is looting, arson, or injuring officers, these criminals will be held to the law through thorough investigation.

“A few days later, a man was charged with aiding and abetting arson at the Minneapolis Police Department’s Third Precinct. Branden Michael Wolfe made his initial appearance June 9. At the time of his arrest, Wolfe was wearing multiple items stolen from the Third Precinct. Two others arrested in connection with the Third Precinct include Dylan Shakespeare Robinson, arrested June 14 and charged with aiding and abetting, and Bryce Michael Williams, arrested June 16 and charged with conspiracy to commit arson.” -ATF.GOV

https://www.atf.gov/news/pr/atf-provides-case-update-continues-seek-public%E2%80%99s-help

Eye Protection

Revision Military has been providing officers eye protection during these violent protests to ensure that officers can protect themselves from the illegal and dangerous laser activity. The Revision FT-2 in StingerHawk frames are the recommended eye protection due to protecting the officers eyes while still allowing them to use their red or green emitting equipment without any viewing obstruction.

https://www.revisionmilitary.com/en/eyewear/spectacles/stingerhawk-eyewear-ft-2-laser-protective-basic-kit

Going Forward

Non-Lethal Banned?

“SEATTLE — A U.S. judge on Friday ordered Seattle police to temporarily stop using tear gas, pepper spray and flash-bang devices to break up peaceful protests..”-Q13Fox

https://www.q13fox.com/news/judge-orders-seattle-to-stop-using-tear-gas-during-protests

Peaceful protests eh? If counter measures are being used there is a reason and that reason isn’t that these protests are peaceful, but I digress..
When standard and safe equipment is taken from our officers a method needs to be used to continue the job and that can be the BE Meyers GLARE HELIOS and GLARE RECOIL. Departments that thought these were of no use to them are finding themselves in situations where they are now in NEED.

The B.E. Meyers devices have been used for many years by various Mil and LE agencies. However, with the civil unrest and violent protests that many cities are facing for the first time there is a revitalized need for such equipment. More agencies are reaching out to purchase this equipment, both for the protection of their city and safety of their officers.

DHS in Portland, Oregon

A personalized thanks from myself and many others go out to BE Meyers specifically for the quick and honest actions during the riots of 2020. Lasers were handed out on the streets to officers that ordered them and well…really couldn’t wait for shipping.

The New RMRcc From Trijicon

Trijicon teased a new optic yesterday using a shadowed photograph a man drawing (or perhaps rehosltering) appendix. This, of course, caused a stir in the optics community as the company was rumored to be dropping a new smaller footprint dot to compete with the highly successful Holosun 507K and Shield sights, especially on the slim 9’s.

Trijicon delivered the RMRcc (Concealed Carry) a reduced size red dot available in a 3.25 and 6 MOA. Sporting the rugged stats and high battery life that the RMR Type 2’s are known for and running off a CR2032 battery.

But… not everything that shooters had been asking for was delivered, and curiously so. The RMRcc still has the bottom loaded battery, requiring removing the sight and relocking the threads for most pistols when a battery change is needed.

Secondly, the RMRcc has an entirely new footprint and uses adapter dovetail plates to interact with the majority of handguns, replacing the rear sight. There are currently 11 plates listed on Trijicon’s webpage for various handgun models, ‘Optic’s Ready’ type plates are $69.00 retail and dovetail plates are $102.00.

Walther PPS Dovetail Plate, AC32103

There is currently no listed plate for P320 models, there is for the P365 dovetail and 365XL (listed on EuroOptic, although not on Trijicon’s RMRcc page). Suggested Retail, from Trijicon, the sight is $699 and then the compatible plate(s). I’m seeing them for under $600 for optic and one plate.

Perhaps the most baffling feature are the 3 MOA adjustments. Sure, less clicks. But also less precision on refining a zero. Perhaps the numbers just don’t add up to needing more precise adjustments but it seems like a curious move to make a 1″ click at 33 yards.

Feelings on the new optic appear to be mixed, with some praising the release and others more… meh. I’m honestly in the ‘meh’ category. I don’t doubt this thing has a good LED emitter and is rugged (it apparently has the RMR electronic suite), but introducing another mounting pattern for milling will complicate the game.

I prefer the milled mount system. I also prefer an accessible battery housing. As cool as it might be that this thing can go to a 20m depth… I don’t swim beyond 5m, rarely beyond 3m… and I’ve never taken my RDS pistol. Rain, sweat, and puddle proof but mounted battery accessibility would have been the ticket in my opinion.

Their “4 Year” battery life is for setting 4 of 8, the two bottom settings are NV which is of no value to the majority of buyers (seriously, who’s rocking NODs with their EDC loadout?) meaning this is the second lowest ‘visible’ setting. 8 is the “super bright” and, taking a wild guess off of previous optics, the RMRcc will probably live life comfortably at setting 6 or 7, not 4, so the 4 year life is academic more than anything. However this isn’t an unusual advertising practice.

Most folks, myself included usually do a ~1 year change out and I don’t see that being a problem on the RMRcc either to get a year off a battery, but you will have to demount, remount, and rezero.

Overall this thing feels like a mixed bag of confusing features that Trijicon says people asked for and I’m wondering… who? I might know them and it might be for valid reasoning but the reaction online is very much a raised eyebrow. This isn’t the challenge to the 507K that I was expecting. I really don’t think this challenges the 507K, it’s just kind of… another dot you can pick, especially if you like Trijicon’s, that you’ll have to build out your pistol(s) around specifically with plates or milling.

It might be nice on my EMP but compatibility with a plate isn’t listed. It feels like a dot that is supposed to be competing with the other mini-dot’s but when you look at the feature list.. it’s kind of just its own thing.

It feels like a hipster RMR. Not really improved or better, just different. Might get one, might not. Your mileage may vary.

More AK Science!

Despite what ‘Grand Dad’ or that weird uncle with the wild hair and stash of cheap crap guns might have told you. Making a gun fully automatic takes a little more than just ‘filling the thing down juuuust right‘. It’s taking a high pressure process that happens several times a second, usually 10-15, and making sure that all the correct things take place for it to happen safely.

This means timing. This means correct part weights and pressures. This means having parts in place so that nothing happens out of sequence. This means building in such a way that if something does happen out of sequence, the explosive failure (yes, it will be explosive) happens in such a manner as to minimize and avoid injury to the operator.

This is why automatic and burst fire triggers have extra parts. It’s why you can’t easily convert a semi-automatic into a fully automatic firearm, because you need these extra different parts. I know Nancy P. and the Gun Control Gang say otherwise, but since they’re functioning morons in this regard you should ignore them.

Every (successful) variation of fully automatic have design considerations implemented to make certain everything goes in order and on time (unlike USPS and FedEx quite often).

Anyway, Brandon.

What’s in Your (Emergency) Wallet?

PHLster PEW (Pocket Emergency Wallet)

Look in your wallet right now. Do you have a $20? Not $20 on a credit or debit card, and not a combination of small bills that add up to $20. An actual, single, set aside $20 bill. This bill is a separate tool, set apart from your standard pile of currency and electronic funds.

It’s for “emergency” use.

A good friend of mine has proffered the theory of the MBT, the My Bad Twenty $20. This theory, and I am paraphrasing because I can’t find the video at the moment, covers the fact that $20 is a versatile amount of money. Not just from a monetary standpoint but a social one. $20 means something right now, handing it to somebody also means something.

The My Bad $20 is both financial and social emergency insurance, handing someone a $20 if you’ve had or generated difficult circumstances around them, can do quite a bit to diffuse a potentially escalating situation or to be certain there are no hard feelings after a contentious social encounter. This doesn’t necessarily mean a negative encounter, many negative encounters are already beyond the point where an MBT can turn the situation. But the MBT does wonders to turn potentially negative encounters positive, combined with sincere words of affirmation and contrition. (Hey, bud. I know my guy was acting an ass and puked. Thanks for helping getting him out of here safe. *hands $20*)

This combined societal and monetary exchange salvages savable situations and can leave all affected parties feeling better off (except the blacked out guy), especially in circumstances where you are likely to encounter those people again. It leaves good impressions where there could otherwise be bad. This isn’t “please forget about it”. That doesn’t work, at all, you just paid them to remember. This is literally ‘My Bad, I acknowledge this has been difficult and I or my party contributed to that, thanks for doing your thing and helping out’ and that has a sincerity that leaves a highly improved impression.

That $20 can also be used to cement a relationship and reward extraordinary service. Tipping above and beyond after a particularly good interaction, also to folks who do not normally receive tips it means a great deal.

Now, back to the question, do you have a $20? Or perhaps $50 or even $100 depending on the environment. If not you are lacking a very versatile social emergency tool in a time where people interacting with people can go poorly. Having cash is important because cash is both universal and instantaneous. There is no hassle to it, electronics are a hassle and do not convey the social message sincerely, because of the steps involved and how clunky a PayPal transfer is it comes off as artificial.

Now, let’s think of life threatening emergencies.

That $20 only spends if you have it and it only works if you use it right.

The same goes for a knife. A gun. Or a medkit.

I chose the Pocket Emergency Wallet (PEW) from PHLster for a reason. Medical is substantially more likely to see use than a weapon.

A weapon is for projecting substantial or lethal force in situations where that is necessary to achieve your desired outcome. IE: Survive.

Medical equipment is for injuries, and injuries happen magnitudes more often. Humans (and pets) are really good at unintentionally damaging ourselves. Pretty good at doing intentionally too, but that is overall the rarer circumstance. Like the MBT, any amount of medical aid you can provide in an uncertain world… and hell if it isn’t uncertain right now… has to be on your person in order to make the difference (yes, car counts too if you’re in a position to get it).

I don’t have to point out the myriad situations and locations where this could come in handy, they’re plastered over media. But so many of the forgotten ones are just as relevant. You don’t know if that TQ could save someone at a wreck, but you’ll know for certain if you need something and have nothing.

So folks, keep your Emergency Wallet Stocked and on you. For all those occasions coming up where you don’t know you need it, yet.

Another win for M-LOK: The Brits

I read this announcement here first.

TFB: British Army Makes Move To M-LOK as SA80 A3 Receives Tweaks

M-LOK has been added to the L85/SA80’s list of improvements for the service rifles first Product Improvement Program (PIP) as they are known here in the US DoD. A service wide or at least mass implemented upgrade to an item in armories to improve the utility to the individual using it.

The SA80 had a troubled start to life as it was designed by a group who had never before designed a rifle. It had to be fixed by H&K. As GWOT rolled on Daniel Defense added an upgrade series too, rails.

The SA80 has a more recent memory troubled reputation than the AR-15, and in the UK they don’t have nearly as large a group of folks providing real time relevant information on the rifle like they do for the AR-15 here in the US. Heck you’ll find much more info on the FAL than on the SA80 in the UK public, it is a better known rifle to them at large.

H&K managed to work the bugs out is the short version and the MoD is keeping the rifle.

Image via UK MoD via TFB.

The rifle itself is a bullpup AR-18 essentially. It isn’t a poor design or one that is drastically inferior to other 5.56 NATO carbines, especially the bullpups. I certainly wouldn’t pick it first given a slew of options, but I’m also not trained on it. My time and training bias me to pick the SCAR, X95, and M16/M4 before anything else. Were I handed an SA80A2 or A3 however and told, “this is what you’ve got.” then it is time to figure out the rifle and get to work. With a little familiarization time I’m sure I’d have it down in a day or so.

Anyway. The Brits have joined America (and if I recall correctly, Poland) in the CRANE backed selection of M-LOK as the negative space mounting system of choice. This change was done after the A3’s hit service start in 2018 and were designed ‘in the field’ with 3D printing technology. Soldiers would give feedback and it would be rapidly prototyped to put on the rifle.

That’s just cool, like Science Fiction cool.

The most visible change is the transition from HKey (Heckler & Koch’s own KeyMod system) to M-LOK attachment points. The changes were iteratively prototyped using 3D technology allowing the Infantry Trials and Development Unit (ITDU) to test changes as they were made. Major Richard McMahon, a senior member of the British Army’s dismounted close combat through-life support team said “the ability to produce 3D printed mock-ups allowed the project to move at substantial pace, with various designs tested and the ability to make quick changes as issues were encountered.” McMahon also noted that ITDU had procured its own 3D printer to allow greater experimentation in-house. -TFB

Also being added are rotation limited QD points for slings, something that still eludes most of the US service rifles even though it shouldn’t. More space for air-cooling and removal of a feature that was for an optional underbarrel grenade launcher the MoD hasn’t integrated, but still can with a milled in modification.

The US also appears to be moving away from underbarrel GLs as the M320 is often carried stand-alone instead of under an M4, at unit discretion. There is merit to carrying two lighter independent systems, since they are deployed quite differently on different threat types, than one heavier awkward combined system.

Now that’s a “transition to sidearm” with some thump to it.

Anyway, welcome to team M-LOK boys.

The Price of MP5’s is too D*mn High!

$3,000+… was the expected price to pay for a genuine H&K MP5 variant. With MSRP’s hovering just south of $3k and the need to add stocks, braces, slings, and magazines it was easy to hit $4k, or even flirt with $5k without trying too hard.

Why? Even clones like the Turk Zenith or American PTR push $2k and more after accesories while the .308 G3 clones hover just above or below $1,000.00. The roller guns were some of the earliest in “modular” firearms since the parts commonality on the models were very high, especially for the era.

The G3, HK33, and MP5 are easily the most successful non-gas operated rifle and submachine gun series of the 20th Century. They are iconic, and the winner of the whole series is undoubtedly the MP5. The G3 had other successful 7.62 NATO rifles competing with it, the FAL undoubtedly the most successful, and the AK was a major competitor as well. The HK33 was competing against the AR-15, AR-18, the concept of a “NATO” standard rifle instead of just ammo was lost after the US didn’t pick up the FAL.

But the MP5 stood alone as an accurate low recoil CQB SMG that fired from the far more reliable closed bolt position and was deliberately select-fire like the emerging battle rifle and assault rifle systems. Earlier legacy SMGs were designed as open bolt and nearly always be used on automatic. No other system would gain the successful status or maintain the longevity of the MP5. Even in H&K’s own catalog of offerings never ousted its champion.

It wasn’t until the 21st Century, with weapons like the SIG MPX and CZ’s Scoprion EVO3 S1, that the MP5 really even developed a peer group. Now there is a thriving Pistol Caliber Carbine (PCC) category at a variety of price points. The MP5, in a manner like the AR-15, has managed to keep a slot as a premier firearm in its niche and maintain it for decades. In fact, the AR-15 only has 3 years on the MP5 since it was introduced by Colt in 63′ and the MP5 was introduced in 66′.

Despite being decades ahead of the MIL-STD 1913 Picatinny rail, those rails were adopted successfully into the design and today M-LOK is readily available too.