Advertisement

The One They Call M’Bogo

Perhaps you’ve heard of Symtac Consulting, the father-son duo made up of Rob and Matt Haught: high priests responsible for preaching the holy gospel of the Gauge.

But this post is not about either of them nor is it about their awesome shotgun clinics they hold throughout the land, I am writing about the one they call “M’Bogo!”

For reference “M’bogo” is the Swahili word for the African Cape Buffalo, one of the meanest and most dangerous beasts to prowl across the African savanna. The African Cape Buffalo is a founding member of that five animal group that makes up world’s most dangerous game. Hunting them requires powerful and dangerous weaponry with the ability to deliver quick follow up shots in case you miss or fail to put it down with the first shot…lest an enraged buffalo charge and maul you to death.

These bulls are not to be trifled with



With the meaning and origin of M’bogo made clear, let’s talk about Matt Haught’s M’bogo.

As currently configured, M’Bogo is a fourteen inch short barreled 12 gauge Remington 870 pump action shotgun. Its soul lies in its barrel—one that was fully done up by the gunsmiths at Vang Comp Systems. Not only was this barrel modified by cutting down a longer barrel to fourteen inches and given the internal treatment that Vang Comp is known for, but it also sports a very cool vent rib customization with an even cooler rear safari style sight module.

M’Bogo is equipped with two rear sights, one express style safari sight that is lighting fast when lined up with the front XS front sight via its wide U-notch and its other rear sight, a leaf sight cut into a semi aperture, flips up into place for use with slugs—specifically Federal Tru-Ball slugs zeroed at fifty yards.

Originally, Matt was planning on installing a pistol sight on the front with a folding rear sight. After consulting with GT, the head gunsmith at Vang Comp, GT devised a more elegant solution utilizing the safari style sight module with dual rear sights. It was the implementation of this safari style sight system by GT that inspired the name M’Bogo on this Remington 870 SBS build.



After talking with him, Matt explained how the process of lengthening the forcing cone and backboring the barrel help shotguns maintain very tight and consistent shot patterns. He adds that this is in part because the treatment effectively smooths out the internal bearing surfaces of the shotgun barrel that make contact with the cartridge’s wad and shot column.

Shotgun barrels have a transitional space between their chambers and actual bores known as the forcing cone; the internal diameter in forcing cones somewhat constricts forward of the chamber as it turns into the bore. Many mass produced shotgun barrels have a relatively short length and abrupt constriction—factors which lead to shot being deformed and disturbed as it travels down the bore. Vang Comp’s treatment mitigates this issue and as result, the shot and wad travel down the barrel while being minimally disturbed. Upon exiting the muzzle, the treatment sets up the wad and shot column for success by ensuring very consistent and tight patterns at longer distances than what a normal, out of the box, mass produced shotgun can typically deliver.

A top view of M’Bogo’s barrel. You will notice the customized rear sight module, followed by the top surface of a vent rib that leads you towards the XS front sight. While you can’t see it, this barrel has been treated by the shotgun wizards at Vang Comp.



Another well known and popular modification that Vang Comp does to barrels is that they port their shotgun barrels. Ported barrels typically have slots or holes around the 11 o’clock and 1 o’clock positions, right behind the muzzle, that allow expanding gases to escape at those specific positions in order to counteract the natural muzzle rise that is normal during recoil.

However, Matt specifically told me that he declined porting on M’Bogo’s barrel because he felt that it wasn’t contextually appropriate for him. He wished to avoid hot gasses near his hand while cycling the action of a short barreled shotgun. Additionally of mention, there are methods and techniques that any shotgun shooter can use to mitigate shotgun recoil and index their muzzle back to their target more quickly, such as the push-pull technique, which incidentally, the Haughts are known for in the American tactical shotgun world.

The remainder of M’Bogo’s daily outfit consists of a Magpul 870 SGA stock, a Vang Comp +1 tube magazine extension, a Vang Comp Big Dome crossbolt safety, a Vang Comp follower, a GG&G sling mount adapter, a Hogue Overmold fore-end, and last but not least, M’Bogo’s receiver is configured to use Vang Comp’s velcro card side saddles.

Besides the Tru-Ball slugs that it’s zeroed with, M’Bogo’s diet generally consists of 8-Pellet Federal Flite Control (LE133 00) shotshells. Matt keeps four in the tube in the “cruiser ready” position and three additional LE133 00 shotshells in his sidesaddle in addition to three Tru-Ball slugs. When doing training drills and practice, M’Bogo enjoys Winchester AA birdshot as it is of high quality and greatly reduces ammunition related malfunctions associated with cheaper types of birdshot that can slow down pump action shotguns.

M’Bogo is a shotgun whose every detail has been well reasoned and considered. Every accessory and detail is not there by accident or coincidence. It is also an iterative shotgun that Matt has slowly changed or altered as he gains more knowledge, experience, or insights. I’ve been fortunate to hold M’bogo in my own hands in the past. When you pick it up, you can’t help but to notice how slick its action is and how grippy the Hogue Overmold fore-end is. When you pick it up and mount it to your shoulder and look down its modified vent rib sights, you know that the shot will connect with whatever it is you aim it at. M’bogo’s heft also gives you a feeling of confidence and reassurance.

Heavy is good, heavy is reliable. Or if it doesn’t work, you can always hit them with it.


Left side view of M’Bogo. Here you can notice the sling and the Vang Comp side saddle full of 8 Pellet Flite Control buckshot. Special thanks to Matt Haught himself for providing me with all the photos of his shotgun for this article.

88.8% Of Federal Firearms Offenders Are Already Prohibited Persons, 1/3 Used A Stolen Gun

Photo Credit: Bryan R. Smith, AFP Via Getty Images

The United States Sentencing Commission “…collects, analyzes, and disseminates a broad array of information on federal crime and sentencing practices”. They comb through reams of federal court data from every case in which a defendant is sentenced, and prepare reports on the collected information, shedding light on potential causes, and observable effects of Federal prosecutions in America.

The sheer volume of data available from their website is astounding, and is a valuable resource anyone who takes the RTKBA cause seriously should look into. But why are we talking about this today? Because today they released their latest report, which sheds some light on what your average federal firearm offender looks like that many of you won’t find especially surprising. The full report is available here, but we’ve pulled some major findings that warrant dissemination, and may be of use if you find yourself defending your right to not be disarmed among your peers, or in a public forum.

Firstly, over half of those who find themselves in court facing federal firearms charges are thoroughly About That Life. 60.6% already have a prior conviction for a violent offense. This pushes against many gun control narratives, and establishes that the majority of the bad guys in this study already did time for some sort of violent crime. Gun control affects legal gun owners by definition, so nearly 2/3 of the criminals in this study are already outside the reach of a magazine capacity bill, or assault weapons ban. Also of note, compared to all other federal offenders, those facing gun charges are more than twice as likely to have been convicted of prior violent crimes.

Not to be outdone, the second finding we’d like to share is that the overwhelming majority of federal firearms offenders in this study were *already* prohibited from possessing a firearm. 88.8% of these guys were barred by law from holding a gun, let alone using one in such a way they wound up in federal court for it. This includes the prior violent felons mentioned in point 1, as well as “…aliens unlawfully in the United States, fugitives from justice, or persons who unlawfully use or are addicted to controlled substances”. Somehow this doesn’t seem to be impeding them in any effective way, at least according to the government’s data. Apparently universal background checks aren’t stopping them, so what gives?

Well it turns out that our third datapoint is that about 1/3 of them are stealing guns, or buying them on the street, after their unlawful harvest from homes, cops, or cars in parking lots (many of which likely have magnet holsters, and punisher stickers on them, but that’s another discussion). 32.4% of offenders in the study committed said offense while in possession of a stolen gun, or a firearm with an altered, or removed serial number, which is usually a pretty solid indication that it was not acquired legally.

There’s more useful and insightful data in the study, but these three findings stood out the most to us, and not least because they echo the findings of what is probably the most successful gun violence prevention program America has ever tried. Operation Ceasefire and similar programs trialed in dozens of cities over 20 years beginning in the 1990s cut the rate of gun homicides by at least a third, and often more. Additionally it highlighted that in big cities, a shockingly small percentage of the population is responsible for the majority of homicides. In Boston, it was found that 0.6% of the city’s residents committed 60% of the murder.

Hardened, career murderers should be the target of science-oriented, evidence-based policies to reduce homicide and violent crime. Instead of programs like Ceasefire that are proven to work, we get gun control, and new studies coming out confirming what we already knew. No hate on the US Sentencing Commission, they’re doing great work, but what good does it do us when it’s ignored, or worse, surprising to people because effective programs using the same data were buried by politicians who have no use for a program that destroys one of their biggest fundraising platforms?

Firearm Policy Coalition Puts NY And Other Newly Minted Shall-Issue Jurisdictions On Notice

W. Keith Baum Via Getty Images

https://www.firearmspolicy.org/fpc-statement-to-concealed-carry-issuing-authorities

In response to the recent SCOTUS decision in NYSRPA v. Bruen, which functionally dismantled May-Issue permitting schemes (May-Issue meaning that a qualified concealed carry permit application could be denied for any or no reason by the issuing authority, regardless of merit), New York’s state government has been actively throwing everything they have at the application process to make it as onerous and personally invasive as possible. Not content with that, they have also proposed creating a labyrinth of “sensitive areas” which would make legally carrying a nightmare of invisible “no-go” zones.

Despite the obviously obstructionist nature of these proposals, which fly in the face of the SCOTUS decision, many on the left seem to think these are great ideas, and want to spread them around. As we have reported here at GAT recently, California is coming up with its own absurd scheme to skirt the supreme court and make gun manufacturers liable for things criminals do with their products. They pretend that gunmakers are magically immune from prosecution to justify this, but have you ever seen Honda get sued by the family of a drunk driver? Neither have we, so lets skip the pretense and start talking plainly.

That’s what FPC is doing with this statement. They are putting it out there for everyone who might attempt to play fuck-fuck games with the law, that there are people watching, waiting, and hell, probably salivating after the chance to take these people to court. FPC and others have put spurs to such governors and legislators before with precedents and rulings that predate the existence of Poland. We’re looking forward to seeing them get beat with a Supreme Court decision whose ink is still wet.

The XM250 is a beast.

Mike “Garand Thumb” Jones is back with another inspired review.

I’ve actually shot this one too, back at SIG’s Freedom Days event I got to play with the MG68, a variant of which is the XM250. If that’s confusing, don’t let it be. The M240L series is a variant of FN’s MAG machine gun, the XM250 is a variant of SIG’s MG68 series of modern machine guns. Same theory, the XM250 is one variation of several that the MG68 can be made as.

It’s hype, and I am here for it. The 250 is straight fire!

400 to 1 – Personal Protection vs. “Professional”

via you know who. It's in the picture.

We are seeing intellectual dishonesty stretched to the absolute limits of remotely possible credulity after the Greenwood Mall shooting. People claiming that Eli Dicken can’t possibly be a Good Samaritan if he was in violation of the malls standing policy against armed patrons.

A “good” person, they summize, would have blindly followed the request of the mall, despite the very real increased risk the mall is asking shoppers to assume and the lack of other provisions for shopper security they provided.

I am hazarding a guess that these intellectual gymnasts don’t know the parable of the Good Samaritan very well, because Samaritans despised Jews and vice-versa, and not a rule in existence would stop them killing each other. They were actively warring at many instances. So if the Samaritan would have acted as culture dictated (mall rules) he would have been well within ‘his right’ to leave the Jewish traveler of that parable to a gruesome death. He didn’t. He acted righteously and counter to culture and saved a life.

So, when two individuals, the shooter and our hero Eli Dicken, violated the no shoes, no shirt, no service, and please bring no firearms signage, a policy that carries about as much force as a quiet fart, and then the one of those individuals who was intent on carnage was stopped within 15 seconds by the other… we are to decry the actions of the decisive and effective hero?

15 Seconds. 15 from start to end. This is what someone able to protect themselves can accomplish.

We cannot control someone’s actions through posted policy, no matter the force of law behind it. They either agree or they do not, and it is entirely up to them. Two people, confirmed, didn’t follow the mall’s rule that day. One of them bent on destruction, the other to protect himself as the law declares to be his enshrined right.

Self defense won.

Meanwhile, we have Uvalde…

Uvalde, which keeps getting worse, and worse, and worse…

Nearly 400 officers were involved, one of which had a shot on the shooter outside the building, others of which were behind the shooter quickly into the school, with armor and rifles, able to pressure and stop the shooter if they had accepted the mortal risks involved in pressing the gunfight…

They didn’t.

Nobody decided. Nobody pressed through despite the risks, such as the police outside taking a shot on him while he was still outside, or officers pushing through the incoming fire to kill the shooter even if they might take a round in the process.

That second bit was a fundamental law of our USMC CQB training. 1. First Marine is going to get shot. Oh well, you have plates. 2. Push through, your team has your back. 3. Be the first Marine. Every other tactic and procedure we spun up about best and safest practices for clearing a room was shaped by those first three concepts of our mindsets.

Now, these two situations are far from parallel in any number of ways, to include the fact that the shooter in Uvalde knew he was being pursued. But that does not change the fact the some violent initiative on the part of the responding officers, instead of CYA calls to higher authority and dicking around in the hallway, had very good odds of ending the situation sooner, up to possibly making the shooter the sole casualty. We don’t know. We can’t know.

But we do know what did happen as the numerous armed officers, who live everyday in a CYA bureaucratic world, failed to stop the killer for 77 minutes. We also know what happened when a 22 year old man, armed to protect himself, kith, and kin in his day-to-day, did just that in 15 seconds against an equivalent threat, arguably a greater threat since Eli Dicken didn’t have a patrol carbine and buddy cops with carbines.

A meme among memes for this situation, @armed.asian on IG.

So given that almost 400 cops couldn’t protect a school, not the first example and sadly probably not the final example of security failures, but a 22 year old man, righteously armed, could end a similar situation in well under a minute, what conclusion should we draw about who is best placed to protect us?

I’ll wait.

“Studies Find No Evidence That Assault Weapon Bans Reduce Homicide Rates”

The Foundation for Economic Education has a 2019 post that has been seeing a great deal of traffic again.

Why?

It is still relevant. With HR 1808 set for a committee meeting today, Wednesday, July 20th, we need to look at why they’re continuing to push things that don’t work, never have, and never will.

Hint: It’s political clout. Not safety, just political “We tried” *sad emoji* points to use for the midterms.

The studies, data, and examination of the available evidence by scholars suggest that assault weapon bans or buybacks will have little if any effect on rates of violent crime and gun violence.

Mass shootings are unconscionable acts of violence and are the most acutely disturbing form of gun violence. In the wake of such tragedies, many gun control advocates lambast gun rights supporters for allowing “weapons of war” onto the streets of America and not supporting “responsible gun reform.”

The measures put forth are usually either a ban and/or mandatory buyback of “assault weapons,” most of which are more accurately known as semi-automatic rifles. (“Assault weapon” is a vague term that varies state to state and can include common pistols and shotguns depending out other attachable accessories.)    

While these initiatives are “common sense” to advocates, if one takes the time to examine the data and evidence, it becomes abundantly clear that gun control in this form will do little to reduce gun violence.

The opening commentary is strong in its outline of the problem. An extreme instance of shocking violence, a mass shooting, triggers very visceral human responses. Those responses are not tempered in logic. Those responses do not solve the problem, nor improve any resultants of humanity’s use of violence as a tool and currency.

These people, wilfully in many instances, misunderstand violence and then scream about their commonsensical solutions for the thing they are fundamentally and wilfully misunderstanding.

Yeah, we can listen to you but we are under no obligation to take you seriously.

Back to FEE

1. Mass shootings with assault weapons constitute a fraction of a percent of gun violence

Mother Jones’s database of mass shootings, defined as shootings involving three or more fatalities, shows that between 2007 and 2017, there were 495 people murdered in such events. When breaking down those shootings by the weapons involved, it is revealed that around half of those victims (253) were murdered by a perpetrator with an assault weapon (AW), such as an AR-15.

In the years since, yes, semi-auto rifles and rifle styled handguns have shown up in more slayings. But those rates are consistent with their record smashing increased market share, increases in pop culture popularity, lower costs for the entry level items, and a full two decades of GWOT influence on the markets.

Even after all of that, handguns remain the tool of choice for the vast majority of lethal criminal violence and remain very common among mass shooters. Just because the rifles are the ones that make headlines doesn’t equate to a proper appreciation for their theat value.

Over the same timeframe, FBI annual crime reports show that there were 150,352 homicides in total, of which 103,901 involved firearms. This means that mass shootings involving AWs constitute 0.17 percent and 0.24 percent of all homicides and firearm homicides, respectively.

To further illuminate the relative infrequency of mass shootings with “assault weapons,” consider the fact that in 2017, some 1,590 people were murdered using knives or sharp instruments.

Over the last five years, 261 people were murdered with AWs in mass shootings (an average rate of 52 murders annually.) At such a rate, it would take over 30 years of mass shootings with AWs to produce the same number of deaths as one year’s worth of knife murders. (It would take 135 years’ worth of mass shootings with AWs to produce the 7,032 deaths that handgun homicides did in 2017.)

Consequently, even a completely effective ban/buyback of AWs would have an incredibly small impact on rates of homicide and gun violence, and then there is always the probability that people intent on committing mass violence will substitute AWs with other available firearms or methods of destruction (such as homemade explosives.)

I’m glad spaces are acknowledging that if we don’t remove motive then removing one convenient method from a highly motivated violent individual or group does diddly and squat in equal portions to stop the violence.

2. Studies find no evidence assault weapon bans reduce homicide rates

There are theoretical reasons to doubt the effectiveness of a ban or buyback of assault weapons, but it also doesn’t help that real-world evidence suggests these measures fail to produce reductions in gun violence.

Between 1994 and 2004, the federal government banned the manufacture, sale, or transfer of assault weapons and large-capacity magazines.  A subsequent Department of Justice study found no evidence that the ban had had any effect on gun violence and stated that “should it be renewed, the ban’s effects on gun violence are likely to be small at best and perhaps too small for reliable measurement.”

A recent study published this year in the Journal of General Internal Medicine examined state gun control policies and found no statistically significant relationship between assault weapon or large-capacity magazine bans and homicide rates. A Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) study came to the same conclusion.

Then there’s the more recent studies still supporting the conclusion that most prohibitive/ban style gun control remains totally ineffective. RAND tore apart the methodology on over 99% of 28,000 gun control studies, finding them worthless.

3. Australia doesn’t prove gun control works

In 1996, Australia experienced a horrific mass shooting. In response, the government implemented a mandatory buyback scheme that banned and confiscated certain types of firearms, including assault weapons.

A 2016 JAMA study on the matter found no statistically significant change in the trend of the country’s firearm homicide rate following the law’s passage. The authors also noted that the decline in firearm suicides post-ban could not clearly be attributed to gun control since non-firearm suicides fell by an even greater magnitude.

Australia’s relative luck on avoiding a massacre since 1996 proves nothing more than no one has been pissed enough at the Aussie’s to try it. New Zealand had the exact same record as Australia until Christchurch, and Australia and New Zealand’s bans won’t stop the motivated slaying when it comes.

4. There is inconclusive evidence of assault weapons bans on mass shootings

Last year, the RAND Corporation released an extensive scientific analysis of available evidence on gun control measures and how they relate to various crime outcomes. Regarding the effect of assault weapons bans on mass shootings, they determined the evidence was “inconclusive.”

When former President Bill Clinton claimed the 1994-2004 federal assault weapons ban was associated with reduced mass shootings, Politifact rated that claim as “half-true,” noting that “the ban’s impact remains unclear.”

Using Mother Jones’s data on mass shootings, I constructed the graph you see above. Prior to the ban, on average five people were killed with assault weapons in mass shootings per year. During the ban, that number went slightly down to four. Post-ban, it rose to 22.

But mass shootings with assault weapons didn’t rise until 2012—eight years after the ban ended. In the seven years after the ban, there was only an average of four people killed in mass shootings with assault weapons per year.

Did it really take eight years for angry people to realize that “assault weapons ” were back on the menu? Or was it, perhaps, a hostile series of cultural shifts, not the least of which is the horrific awe we hold for mass killers.

Given the fact that the pre-ban period and the seven years after the ban had essentially the same rate of mass shooting deaths with assault weapons, it is hard to prove that the ban had any effect on mass shootings.

Remember, California’s A rated gun control policies sit within the state with both the most mass shootings and school shootings.

In Conclusion

The studies, data, and examination of the available evidence by scholars suggest that assault weapons bans or buybacks will have little if any effect on rates of violent crime and gun violence. There seems to be no relationship between these gun control measures and reductions in firearm homicide or suicide, and there doesn’t appear to be any clear evidence they reduce mass shootings.

The only reason the politicians want to push HR 1808 is political gain, they need money and a cause because inflation is at 9.1% and the housing market is absurd for anyone on a tight budget. The bill has 212 cosponsors, all Democrats, do the math. This may also be a clapback against SCOTUS for Bruen.

Are Automatic Knives Worth It?

I’m not quite a knife guy. Knife guys can often be a bit like the furries of the tactical world. Even so, I appreciate a good knife and am admittedly a fan of automatic knives. Automatic knives, aka switchblades, are knives designed to open with the press of a button or the push of a switch. Automatic knives dominate popular media and are a sure sign of an experienced knife fighter, right?

John Wick uses a Benchmade Infidel; over time, enough bad guys have used switchblades to establish that they are the baddie. They are cool! The question is, are they worth it? Are they the monstrous weapon film, media, and politicians make them out to be? Most importantly, are they worth your money?

The Appeal Of Automatic Knives

What’s the appeal of automatic knives? There is something very satisfying about pressing a button or pushing a switch and seeing a blade spring to life. The original appeal to these knives back in the day was the ability to open the blade with a single hand. Opening a folding knife took time and effort when automatic knives came to be.

You often had to use your thumbnail to fish the blade out of the handle. These early switchblades sprung to life with ease. They became the best friend of paratroopers in World War 2. If you got stuck in a tree, you could easily open your knife and cut your way out of your parachute rigging.

Out the front, or OTF, knives are seemingly the only safe way to carry a dual-edge blade in a non-fixed blade design. The appeal exists just like the appeal to Cabot 1911s and Beretta over/under shotguns. Some people just want finely tuned, expensive, and very nice knives.

The Downsides of Automatic Knives

Automatic knives seem plenty cool, so what’s the problem? It’s a multifactor answer, and you have to consider the two types of automatic knives. Out the front is exactly how it sounds. The blade comes out of the front of the knife. Witt out-the-side knives, the blade opens like a traditional folder, but with the press of a button rather than a thumb stud.

OTF knives tend to be somewhat fragile. Not like a ceramic vase fragile, but nowhere near as strong or durable as a traditional folding knife. The blades rely on a somewhat complicated mechanism to spring to life made up of several small internal parts. The fragility comes from the lock easily breaking when compared to a traditional knife.

Side opening automatic knives tend to be tough but are still reliant on several small pieces to operate effectively. They are fine for EDC use or self-defense, but a traditional folding knife will likely serve you better for any kind of hardcore work. These knives are more maintenance heavy and more likely to malfunction when exposed to dirt, debris, and similar gunk. More parts, more failure points.

The possibility of the knife opening in your pocket also exists with automatic knives. Some, mainly side folders, do have some form of safety to prevent this from happening. While smart safety-wise, the main purpose of these knives is to be deployed quickly and easily.

Another issue comes from the price point. These knives are expensive, and you are very clearly paying for the knife’s operating system. The Benchmade infidel costs as much as a used Glock 19 and uses a great D2 steel blade. Alternatively, I can purchase a Benchmade Griptilian with a D2 steel blade for less than 150 dollars.

Opening Fast

Switchblade bans didn’t eliminate the need or market for a fast-opening knife, and the market found numerous ways to produce fast-opening knives without an automatic function. Plenty of standard knives can be used very quickly without needing an automatic function.

I can open my Benchmade Griptilian just as fast as I can activate my Hogue OTF’s blade. Side folding switchblades tend to be slower than fast flipping knives. This seemingly makes automatic knives somewhat useless for a practical purpose.

That doesn’t mean they aren’t fun. They certainly shouldn’t be outlawed in so many places, either. I can fully accept that automatic knives aren’t that useful, but that doesn’t mean I don’t own half a dozen of them. They can be great fun, but if you only have the funds for one nice knife, I wouldn’t make it an automatic.

Failing > Skill Atrophy: Practice Makes Functional

Photo Credit: Sixmaritime.com

No matter what you do with your free time, when you do it, you are actively getting better at it both physically and mentally. When you sit down to binge watch the latest Netflix series, your tendons and muscles are being conditioned to remain in that position, your metabolism slows down, and your brain focuses its maintenance efforts on the neural pathways necessary for receiving a bunch of passive information. You are honing yourself into a Netflix-watching machine. Similarly, if you head to the range, gym, or the woods several times a week, you are doing precisely the same thing, but for completely different activities. Tendons and muscles condition for those activities, and your brain starts bushwhacking new paths to improve your ability to mentally process and respond to what’s going on. Whatever you do, whatever it is, you get better at just by doing it, even if it’s incremental, and even if you fail.

So for those of us who deliberately choose to drive our minds and bodies toward a particular goal, by devoting our precious free time to related activities, it can be incredibly frustrating when we fail. Even moreso when it’s a regular, or even constant thing. But while it’s tempting to either give up completely, or decide that you’ll never get better, and abandon that goal for a different one (admittedly the least awful of those two options), there’s a better answer that the venerable Greg Ellifritz discusses at his excellent Active Response Training blog: Suck more.

Greg outlines an explicit path toward success, and you should read it, but the jist of it is that failing is a relative thing. Sure, the No Fail drill is a wildly difficult shooting test, but it’s supposed to be. You are probably guaranteed not to get it your first try, because, you probably aren’t in the top 10% of shooters. This isn’t a drill to try out on your first range trip, because without really, really, solid fundamentals, it’s impossible. If you’re in a solid space already as a shooter, and you fail a high-level drill like this, the answer is to keep sucking at it until you don’t. Adjust the standards to a place where you CAN succeed, and then push yourself from there. It’s not cheating, it’s the way to get there without beating your head against a wall. Alternatively, take a class from a vetted instructor (Greg offers some here). Explain the drill and your specific difficulty with it, and it’s very likely that a competent instructor can diagnose and help correct your issues.

Whatever you do, don’t quit. As a wise philosopher once said, “Sucking at something is the first step to being sort of good”. Remember that your actions have consequences, and if you give up and succumb to the couch, you will stop moving toward shooting (or hiking or whatever it is you do) excellence, and towards couch excellence. There’s too many couch experts out there already, so do yourself a favor, get back out there, and go suck harder until you don’t.

An Indiana Man Ignored a “No Guns” Policy at the Greenwood Mall, Saving Potentially Dozens of Lives

Photo Credit: Kelly Wilkinson/AP


First off to avoid any confusion, we’d like to say that no law was violated by who police are calling the “Good Samaritan”. In Indiana, as well as many other states, if a company decides to institute a policy for their private property that disallows legally carried firearms, they’re welcome to. That policy, if broken, means that upon discovery of this company policy violation, the violator must immediately leave when asked, or be trespassed. Generally, trespassing isn’t a major crime, but the seriousness of that escalates when one is armed, so while it’s always a good idea to leave private property when asked, it’s even moreso in such a situation.

So no, he wasn’t carrying illegally, he was flaunting a policy on par with “No Shoes, No Shirt, No Service”. In fact, the shooter with the rifle wasn’t in violation of the law either, up until he levelled his weapon at innocents with malicious, criminal intent. So now that that’s settled, we can stop braying about charging the person who stopped what could easily have been an even worse tragedy with a crime that doesn’t exist, and focus on what actually happened.

Which is precisely that the “Good guy with a gun” narrative was borne out in dramatic fashion. After weeks of holding up the Uvalde police’s complete breakdown in command and control as an exemplar of how wrong the RTKBA community is about the net good that gun ownership is to our society, this tragedy-cut-short lands firmly in their lap, handily proving them wrong. Does this cause any introspection, reconsideration, or really just… thought?

One can dream apparently, but no.

What it has caused the anti-gun proponents in this country and abroad to do, is to continue to ignore the fact that the Uvalde PD has clearly demonstrated that while they do indeed have guns (lots of them), they are the furthest thing from a group of “good guys”, and call for punishing an actual good guy who stopped a mass murderer.

Admittedly, Uvalde PD should probably all resign, publicly apologize for their abject failure to do even the bare minimum expected of peace officers in such a situation (ignoring over 2 decades of established best practices) and find a different career, but that doesn’t change the reality in Indiana one iota. Is the Uvalde tragedy the result of publicly attempting to defund and demoralize police in this country? Is it the result of the well-known and discussed issue of lackluster, often absurdly minimal police training? Is it just a small town department with an incompetent leader? In truth it’s probably a shit footlong with a hefty dose of all of the above, but what’s missing here is any sort of introspection or analysis of the situation by the media and gun control proponents amplified by them, instead parroting the same line regardless of the context.

Disgusting? Yeah, absolutely. Depressing? By the truckload, yes. Surprising? Unfortunately not in the slightest, if you pay attention to the schizophrenic positions they’ve been pushing. The most obvious example is the fact that many working against the 2A seem to think you can defund the police while instituting sweeping gun control laws, up to and including confiscation.

Let’s do a little thought experiment, shall we?
If: Law enforcement in America is racist, classist, too heavily armed, and too quick to violence, particularly against POC/LGBTQ+,
And: Gun control proposals like an “assault weapons” ban require the expansion of police powers to detain, investigate, and arrest violators, as well as confiscate such arms from those who flaunt the law, by force if necessary,
Then: The ACAB/Ban Guns crowd are proposing to expand and empower a heavily armed, overly violent group who is murdering minorities, and whose gun control enforcement efforts will necessarily involve over-policing marginalized groups of Americans.

So in summary, the exact thing we are told never happens in this country, happened in what preliminary reports seem to indicate was a wildly heroic and dramatic fashion, and the messaging doesn’t pause, shift, or change in the slightest. Reality is substituted with a narrative-friendly fiction that “cops are bad, but also the good guys”, and “they should be defunded, but also expanded to enforce laws I like”. They continue plowing the same field of dust and rocks, expecting it will magically produce. Unfortunately, as polarized as this country is, it will likely yield a bountiful crop of votes no matter how absurd it is.

If this depresses you as much as it does us, do your best to reach out to people you know in real life who aren’t as pro-gun as you, and have an honest, respectful, civil discussion with them about why you disagree. If you want to hear an thorough dissection of how to accomplish exactly that, check out an amazing breakdown of the topic by the PHLster crew. It’s not an easy thing to do, but personal connections like that are the only thing that can penetrate the wall of media bullshit and willful ignorance that propagates this sort of mindset. Godspeed, and good luck.

From Panzer to Panther – Germany Taking Lead in Main Battle Tank Design

I don’t go bigger than small arms here often, for obvious reasons, but the new Panther Tank is freakin’ sweet.

Rheinmetall has debuted its new KF51 Panther at Eurosatory 2022. The latest member of Rheinmetall’s family of tracked vehicles (KF is short for “Kettenfahrzeug”, i.e., tracked vehicle), the KF51 Panther is destined to be a game changer on the battlefields of the future. The main battle tank concept sets new standards in all areas – lethality, protection, reconnaissance, networking and mobility. – Matsimus

Contrary to what some have suggested out of Russia’s performance, the Main Battle Tank is far from obsolete and is set to remain part of combined arms doctrine for the foreseeable future. The Russians have just sucked at combined arms. The Rheinmetall KF51 is looking at setting a true 21st Century standard for MBTs where current projects like the M1A3 are upgrade packages.

If Rheinmetall sounds familiar, they designed the Abrams main 120mm gun. They gave this new tank 10mm more. They are a serious armor company.

They Just Cannot Admit Failure…

Image via Northern Provisions IG, Greenwood Park Mall Shooting

For those who haven’t heard yet, Greenwood Park Mall in Indiana was the scene of another mass attack in a public space.

However, Indiana just implemented Constitutional Carry and the shooter was stopped by a 22 year old who was legally armed. This limited the casualty count to three dead and two wounded before the shooter, who was armed with a rifle and multiple magazines according to reports, was killed by the heroic samaritan.

Concealed carry works. Armed people able to respond quickly save lives. Decisive decisions save lives (unlike certain other recent situations).

But all is not well, oh no! Even as the Greenwood Police Chief and Mayor hail the young man as a hero, Gun Control Proponents want the young man to face charges since he violated the mall’s no firearm policy… you know, the one that worked so well at stopping the guy armed with a rifle.

We can’t charge that guy, he’s dead. So charge the guy who stopped him to prove… what?… that gun control works? What we’ve just seen in action is that providing for your own protection works best, fastest, and first.

I know Lars will have some more commentary on this event in a bit, but I just have to get my mind wrapped around the absolutely epic level blinders that gun controllers continue to wear.

They literally cannot mentally accept the failure of their policies. That ‘gun free’ is nothing of the sort as long as a single individual for any reason decides to ignore the policy. That bans only work if you can exercise full control over every aspect of the population and product. That both of these things that they continue to erroneously claim work ‘if only we’d do them right’, only operate on thoughts, prayers, and the intentions of good people.

If 100% of people would just comply with an assault weapon ban we’d have no mass killings with assault weapons!

Now say that for homicide or drunk driving.

Sound stupid?

Good.

Oh, and to top this rant and rave of “He shouldn’t be celebrated!” off, despite the Mayor and Police Chief both saying otherwise, is that the ‘gun free’ isn’t the law. It was mall corporate policy. So legally, should the mall choose to be particularly stupid about this situation, they can ask the man who saved more of their patrons from being murdered to never return or face legal actions.

Which, ironically perhaps, could work as well as their original no firearms policy did should someone decide to make a deal of it.

Laws and policies remain pieces of paper and ink unless there is someone to enforce it upon the non-agreeable types. Everyone gets along… until they don’t.

But sure, let’s punish and deride the one person who did the decisively correct thing and saved lives. Punishing those who act positively, but contrary to the ‘can’t we all just get along’ utopian fallacy, has never backfired negatively, right?

Faxon Firearms’ Guide To Finding The Best AR-10 Barrel

Faxon Firearms’ recently partnered with RE Tactical to write up what they call the definitive guide to finding the best AR-10 barrel. Buying after-market barrels can be a pain. So we’ve brought it here to share with you all. Let’s get into it.

A Definitive Guide To Finding The Best AR-10 Barrel

The purpose of the AR-10 platform is to get more power and long-range precision out of the AR platform. Who doesn’t want more power and precision?

To capitalize on that power and precision, it makes sense to get the best AR-10 barrel you can find. The right barrel will allow you to maximize the benefits of using the larger 308 round in a semi-automatic AR-10 battle rifle.

Faxon Firearms’ high-quality, affordably priced AR-10 barrels are all manufactured in the United States and ready for reliable and accurate long-range shooting. So whether you’re shooting 308 WIN, 6.5 Creedmoor, or the new 8.6 BLK, Faxon has the right barrel for you.

Their stock of AR-10 barrels are available in various lengths up to 24″, Salt Bath Nitride outside finish, gas systems (carbine, mid-length, and rifle-length), and barrel fluting.

Faxon AR-10 barrels are also available in Big Gunner, Heavy Fluted, and Pencil profiles. They are made with the finest 4150 Chrome Moly Vanadium or 416R Stainless Steel and rifled for the best possible velocity and accuracy.

Before we get into finding the best AR-10 barrel, let’s answer some of the most common questions about AR-10 barrel selection.

AR-10 Barrel Length Considerations

AR-10 riffle side view

There is more to consider about the barrel length than its effect on velocity and accuracy. For example, your barrel length will dictate your choice of accessories, such as handguards. Do you want something that just goes past the gas block or something that runs the full length out to the muzzle?

This can be important for aesthetic or practical reasons, such as ensuring that a suppressor or other muzzle device has enough clearance between the end of the muzzle and the handguard. In addition, a longer handguard provides more real estate for accessories like optics, sling mounts, and bipods. Finally, keep in mind that the length of the barrel will play a major part in the rifle’s overall weight, which is something to consider if this is a hunting setup.

What is the optimal barrel length for 308?

Barrels lengths for AR-10 calibers range from 16″ up to 24″. Although 20″ seems to be the sweet spot for the 308, with the right barrel, you can get away with using a 16″ barrel.

How accurate is a 308 16-inch barrel?

A 16″ barrel will do you just fine until you get out to and past 600 yards. Unfortunately, the 308 round will drop significantly past 600 yards, so if you’re going to be engaging targets at distances past 600 yards, you’d be better off with a 20″ barrel.

Is an 18-inch barrel good for an AR-10?

Most 308 WIN loads get full powder burn at roughly 18 inches of barrel length. So for a general-purpose AR-10 build, an 18-inch barrel will do you just fine.

However, even in 18-inch barrels, the profile and gas system length can determine weight. 18-inch barrels can range from a Faxon pencil to a thicker Big Gunner profile and come in both mid and rifle-length types.

What is the most Accurate AR-10 Barrel?

The Faxon Match Series AR-10 barrels take renowned performance and value up a notch.

Manufactured in-house from gun-barrel-quality bar-stock, the Match Series barrels start with 416-R in 5R rifling. 5R is a hybrid rifling with lands opposite grooves and reduced sharp angles that reduce jacket deformation, increasing velocity, and easy cleaning. After rigorous testing, the barrels are Nitride treated inside and out, locking in the bore, extending barrel life, and keeping the elements at bay.

The extension is coated in a Nickel Teflon coating that maintains incredible dry lubricity and corrosion resistance. The Nickel Teflon coating also tightens up the fit between the extension and receiver, further improving accuracy. As a result, the Faxon AR-10 Match Series barrels are ready for when duty calls with unrivaled performance.

Best AR-10 Barrel | Faxon Firearms

Below you’ll find a list of AR-10 barrels available for your next AR-10 build or upgrade.

Faxon Match 16″ Heavy Fluted, 308 WIN Specs

  • Barrel Material: 416-R
  • Barrel Type: 5R Button Rifled
  • Barrel Caliber: .308 WIN
  • Barrel Twist: 1:10
  • Barrel Length: 16
  • Barrel Profile: Heavy Fluted
  • Barrel Gas System: Mid
  • Inside Finish: Salt Bath Nitride
  • Outside Finish: Salt Bath Nitride
  • Muzzle Thread: 5/8-24
  • Gas Block Diameter: .750″
  • Gas Block Journal Length: 1.1″
  • Barrel Extension: DPMS LR-308 Compatible – Nickel Teflon Coated
  • Barrel Weight: 2.03 Lbs
  • Magnetic Particle Inspected
  • Recessed Target Crown
16in 308 Ar-10 Barrel
Side views of the 16 inch 308 barrel

Faxon Match 16″ Big Gunner, 6.5 Creedmoor Specs

  • Barrel Material: 416-R
  • Barrel Type: 5R Button Rifled
  • Barrel Caliber: 6.5 Creedmoor
  • Barrel Twist: 1:8
  • Barrel Length: 16
  • Barrel Profile: Big Gunner
  • Barrel Gas System: Mid
  • Inside Finish: Salt Bath Nitride
  • Outside Finish: Salt Bath Nitride
  • Muzzle Thread: 5/8-24
  • Gas Block Diameter: .750″
  • Gas Block Journal Length: 1.9″
  • Barrel Extension: DPMS LR-308 Compatible – Nickel Teflon Coated
  • Barrel Weight: 1.89 lbs
  • Magnetic Particle Inspected
  • Polished 11-degree Target Crown
16in 6.5 Creedmoor
Side view of the 16 inch 6.5 Creedmoor

Faxon Match 18″ Heavy Fluted, 308 WIN Specs

  • Barrel Material: 416-R
  • Barrel Type: 5R Button Rifled
  • Barrel Caliber: .308 WIN
  • Barrel Twist: 1:10
  • Barrel Length: 18
  • Barrel Profile: Heavy Fluted
  • Barrel Gas System: Rifle (1.1″ Journal)
  • Inside Finish: Salt Bath Nitride
  • Outside Finish: Salt Bath Nitride
  • Muzzle Thread: 5/8-24 TPI
  • Gas Block Diameter: .750″
  • Gas Block Journal Length: 1.1″
  • Barrel Extension: DPMS LR-308 Compatible – Nickel Teflon Coated
  • Barrel Weight: 2.25 Lbs
  • Magnetic Particle Inspected
  • Recessed Target Crown
18in 308 Win Barrel
Side views of the 18 inch 308 WIN

Faxon Match 18″ Big Gunner, 6.5 Creedmoor Specs

  • Barrel Material: 416-R
  • Barrel Type: 5R Button Rifled
  •  Barrel Caliber: 6.5 Creedmoor
  • Barrel Twist: 1:8
  • Barrel Length: 18
  • Barrel Profile: Big Gunner
  • Barrel Gas System: Rifle
  • Inside Finish: Salt Bath Nitride
  • Outside Finish: Salt Bath Nitride
  • Muzzle Thread: 5/8-24
  • Gas Block Diameter: .750″
  • Gas Block Journal Length: 1.9″
  • Barrel Extension: DPMS LR-308 Compatible – Nickel Teflon Coated
  • Barrel Weight: 2.46lbs
  • Magnetic Particle Inspected
  • Polished 11-degree Target Crown
18in 6.5 Creedmoor
Side views of the 18 inch 6.5 Creedmoor

Faxon Match 20″ Big Gunner, 6.5 Creedmoor Specs

  • Barrel Material: 416-R Stainless Steel
  • Barrel Type: 5R Button Rifled
  • Barrel Caliber: 6.5 Creedmoor
  • Barrel Twist: 1:8
  • Barrel Length: 20
  • Barrel Profile: Big Gunner
  • Barrel Gas System: Rifle
  • Inside Finish: Salt Bath Nitride
  • Outside Finish: Salt Bath Nitride
  • Muzzle Thread: 5/8-24 TPI
  • Gas Block Diameter: .750″
  • Gas Block Journal Length: 1.9″
  • Barrel Extension: DPMS LR-308 Compatible – NP3 Nickel Teflon Coated
  • Barrel Weight: 2.59 lbs
  • Magnetic Particle Inspected
  • Polished 11-degree Target Crown
20in 6.5 Creedmoor Ar-10 Barrel
Side views of the 20 inch 6.5 Creedmoor

Wrapping It Up!

The AR-10 is an excellent platform for reaching out with larger calibers.

Choosing the right barrel is a significant decision, one that is based on your needs as a shooter. Long-range competition shooting, close-quarters shooting, and hunting all have different needs, so choose wisely.

Faxon Firearms barrels are some of the best barrels for the money on the market right now. They’re well-designed, and the performance is hard to beat. That’s why the Faxon Firearms 308 Winchester and 6.5 Creedmoor Big Gunner Profile Barrels are some of the best AR-10 barrels on the market.

5.11 Icarus DP Mini – A Little Knife With Big Potential

Sometimes you want a simple, affordable pocket knife that does the basics right. I love fancy knives, and I have knives that I think are absolutely fantastic. I also tend to be less likely to carry expensive knives and stick to what’s simple. The new Icarus DP Mini from 5.11 Tactical checks the box for a simple, effective, affordable pocket knife. 

The Icarus DP Mini is the knife I found when searching for an excellent little knife for my son. He’s of age and can be trusted. I wanted to get him a good knife, but not an overly expensive one. He tends to lose things, so he’s not getting an Emerson or Spyderco just yet. At 32 dollars, the Icarus DP Mini won’t send me into much debt. 

The Little Icarus DP Mini 

The Icarus DP Mini is a simple pocket knife with a name longer than its blade. The little 2.8-inch blade features a simple drop point tip and a fairly simple design. When opened, the knife is 7 inches total, and when folded, it’s 4-inches overall. 

The blade is made from 8CR13MOV, which is admittedly a cheaper steel made in China. The equivalent most would know is AUS8. This steel is perfectly useable for a folding pocket knife as long as it’s heat-treated properly, and that doesn’t seem to be an issue here. For a first pocket knife, it’s a great choice. 

It’s easy to sharpen, resist corrosion pretty well, and get’s quite sharp. A dull knife is a dangerous knife. For a new user, they’ll get plenty of practice sharpening a knife. 

The Icarus DP Mini utilizes a simple, ambidextrous thumb stud for opening and a liner locking system to keep the blade in place. Ambidexterity is the name of the game here, with a removable and reversible pocket clip. While it can jump from side to side, the knife always carries tip-up. The pocket clip is made from metal and is quite short but efficient. 

The Icarus DP Mini comes with a polymer grip. Specifically, fiberglass reinforced nylon. This keeps the knife fairly lightweight, and the whole setup is nice and thin for easy carry. At only 2 ounces, it disappears in your pocket. 

The Icarus DP Mini in Action 

The little Icarus DP Mini opens in a flash with a press of the thumb stud and a wrist flick. It’s not like a Kershaw or Emerson with speed, but who’s racing? The slow but smooth opening design is rather nice. Popping the blade out with a single hand isn’t difficult, and you can keep one hand busy while popping the blade out. 

From 5.11 Tactical, the blade is ultra-sharp and has a nice touch. I hate a dull knife, and 5.11 ensures I don’t have one. The grind has a brilliant edge, and the grind is smooth and even. This makes the cutting action smooth and easily slices through your basic EDC tasks. The drop point isn’t fancy but great for all-around work. 

I have big hands, hands you describe as mitts, and the grip perfectly fits my hand for a little knife. A slight hump accommodates your trigger finger, and a series of serrations, aka the jimping, at the back of the handle and blade, give your thumb a purchase for leverage and control. 

It slices, dices, and does so comfortably. The grip is heavily textured and doesn’t slip in your grip while you work. It doesn’t create hot spots, but that’s also for typical EDC tasks. If you start doing heavy-duty work, you’ll feel the burn a bit. That’s what happens when you put an EDC knife to survival tasks or general heavy work. 

Ninja Style 

The little Icarus DP Mini is a heckuva knife for the price point. I’ve used it for a few weeks for various tasks, including cutting open bags of concrete, slicing thick plastic bands on stacks of lumber, opening boxes, and more. It’s dug in, done the work, and I’ve been more than satisfied with it. 

Now it’s going into the pockets of my son for summer adventures, and I’ll let you guys know after summer break is over how well it can hold up! You can check it out here and tell them we sent you. 

The 1911s Of Thief

This article has been updated after it was pointed out that one of the 1911s shown here was unintentionally misattributed as a Hoag build.

James Caan recently passed away at age 82—a man whose superlative and illustrious career as an actor was greatly appreciated and enjoyed by so many audiences over the years. “Gun guys” (and gals) and fans of classic films will no doubt especially miss Mr. Caan as he starred in a couple of iconic flicks that have captured the imagination of firearms enthusiasts since at least 1981, the year the film Thief was shown to audiences for the first time. Caan is also remembered as Joe Sarno, the old gangster in the film Way Of The Gun where he and his crew of enforcers duke it out with snub nosed revolvers in that famous gunfight scene at the Mexican whorehouse against Parker and Longbaugh and their 9mm 1911s (and Remington 870).

Ask any firearms enthusiast to name a few of their favorite gun flicks and chances are that director Michael Mann’s films will be mentioned. His films and TV shows have always been known and appreciated for the attention to detail pertaining to firearms and tactics; actors who star in Mann’s roles are typically sent to take firearms training courses to learn how to handle them and make their on-screen roles appear more convincing. This is something we also notice in champion shooter Jim Zubiena’s hyperspeed appendix draw when he makes his cameo as the curly haired assassin in Miami Vice. It is something we appreciate amongst the cops and robbers in Heat and how they operate in their respective spaces. And who wouldn’t remember Vincent’s famous “briefcase scene” with his HK USP 45 in Collateral?

Thief was Mann’s feature length cinematic film debut. The movie is about an experienced freelance jewel thief and safe cracker named Frank (played by Caan) who ends up pulling difficult scores down for mobsters and their fences in Chicago and then settling with them.

Michael Mann sent James Caan to Arizona to train with Jeff Cooper at Gunsite (known as the American Pistol Institute in those days) to learn how to shoot, handle, and move with a 1911 pistol. Training with Jeff Cooper at API and shooting a .45 Auto 1911 pistol while going over the finer points of the Modern Technique at that time was considered to be avant-garde and only something that the most serious shooters did. That Mann sent Caan to train at API specifically at this time during the history of the American firearms training industry only reinforces just how serious Mann is about attention to detail. And just like the details concerning firearms, Mann also hired real safe crackers and thieves to provide technical advisory for the heist and robbery scenes. The techniques and procedures shown in the movie are considered serious and professional contextually in that time period.

In an interview, Caan recollects how Mann recruited him for a role in Thief. He adds, “The next thing I know, I’m in Gunsite, AZ with a guy named Jeff Cooper, who teaches like these CIA guys how to sweep a house. We were there for two days and I learned how to handle this .45—that was important to Michael.” Perhaps many readers’ minds instantly shifted to the famous scene leading up to the movie’s final climatic scene, where we observe Frank entering a suburban home in the evening, while carefully sweeping all angles and corners, holding his Jim Hoag 1911 Longslide pistol in a Weaver stance and high thumbhold grip. There are other subtle details that experienced gun guys (and gals) might also pick up on, such as a scene where Frank carries out an old school press check and ensures his pistol is properly loaded prior to entering a building.

One of the best angles in the entire film of the Hoag Longslide 1911. In this still one can clearly see the profile of the Bo-Mar rear sight and the distinctive Colt Gold Cup trigger shoe of the era. You can also see the squared trigger guard in this shot.



There is a bit of a myth surrounding Caan’s visit to API as some have alleged that Colonel Jeff Cooper did not want to associate his Modern Technique material with thieves and criminals and thus had declined to instruct Caan after learning that he was playing the role of a career criminal in his upcoming film. Purportedly, Chuck Taylor, another high level instructor at API had taken Caan offsite to personally coach him for his role as Frank.

The most iconic firearm in Thief is of course that Jim Hoag customized 1911 .45 Auto Longslide pistol that Frank possesses. Jim Hoag was a vaunted southern California gunsmith who was famous for his customized longslide 1911 pistols that usually sported a squared trigger guard, checkering on the frontstraps, commander style hammers, and Bo-Mar adjustable rear sights. Different Hoag builds have different styles of triggers installed; for example, the 1911 Longslide featured in this film has an old school Colt Gold Cup trigger with its unique vertical skeletonization. This little detail is perhaps one of the most distinctive things about that pistol. Additionally, Hoag was also known for setting the Bo-Mar rear sight units as low as possible relative to the top of slides in order to make them as low profile and snag-free as possible.

There are two other 1911 pistols that Frank uses in the movie that were also provided by Hoag Gun Works. One of them is a 5-inch customized Colt Gold Cup (which careful viewers will spot throughout certain parts of the film such as the press-check scene). The other is a chromed Colt Combat Commander. In the scene where Frank flashes that gun to the bar bouncer, one can immediately observe the classic commander style hammer and Bo-Mar sights. The Colt Combat Commander is just a variant of the Government model that has a shorter slide and barrel (measuring 4 ¼ inches instead of 5) and that distinctive commander hammer which replaced the original spur hammer to reduce hammer bite. Hoag built all three pistols by hand and set them up with barrels modified to fire theatrical blanks. Nevertheless Hoag ground and fitted only the lugs of the barrels and not the locking lugs on the slides so that they could later be fitted with the Bar-Sto barrels Hoag Gun Works was using at the time.

Colt Combat Commander, carried in Frank’s waistband. Ideal placement (preferably with a holster)


In short, Thief is an interesting film that showcases a character that is very serious about what he does and how he does it. That Frank arms himself with 1911 pistols such as a Jim Hoag Longslide or a Combat Commander with Bo-Mar sights only shows viewers the extent of his professionalism. For readers under the age of 30, his gear choices are equivalent to Frank arming himself with a 9mm 2011 pistol topped with slide mounted red dot and a Glock 19 (also with a slide mounted red dot) had the plot been set in the current year.

Rest In Peace Mr. Caan—and thank you for sharing your skills and your talent to entertain us on the silver screen for so many years!

Closeup shot of another Jim Hoag 1911 Longslide build, shared here to showcase the fine craftsmanship and meticulous attention to detail. Note the checkering on this build which is said it was something Mr. Hoag did by hand until his later years. The Two-Tone look was the style many custom 1911s were finished in back in the day.

Gunday Brunch 60: Target ID Is Important

All three boys are here this week talking about an important subject for any armed citizen: “Know your target and what is beyond it.”