Advertisement

Real Avid Tools Make Maintaining Your Firearms Easier

One of the most innovative companies to come along in a many years is Real Avid. Real Avid has put a modern more user friendly spin on firearms maintenance and field care. Back in 2012 I was first introduced their tools. It seemed Real Avid had but a handful of items, now they have dozens of tools to take care of your AR, AK, Glock, 1911, shotgun and most any other firearm. Real Avid was gracious enough to get us preproduction samples allowing The GunMag readers to have the first look at a few items.

At the 2019 SHOT Show Real Avid introduced their largest tool kit to date; AR15 Master Armorer’s Kit. This kit will give you virtually everything you need to maintain your AR style rifle or build your own custom AR. When I say everything, I mean everything from cleaning picks to a torque wrench to properly tighten the castle and barrel nuts.

Let’s take a look at the kit. First off is the carrying case. Unlike many kits on the market that come in a “case” that lasts about as long as the first use, Real Avid ships this kit in a case built to keep your tools properly stored for years to come. This kit was designed for the anal retentive with ach tool having its own spot. Tools lock into its spot and save for tossing the kit, they stay in place. I feared everything would a shambles when I knocked it off my desk chair. Thankfully all the tools were still in place.

Back in November 2, 2018 GAT Daliy did a review of major items in this kit: Master Bench Bloc, Master Armorer’s Wrench and Pin Punch Kit. These tools are all on my bench and get used regularly. The Handguard removal tool makes removing and installing M4/AR15 GI style forearms easy as opening a bottle of pop. The pick set gets into all the nooks and crannies to thoroughly clean your AR.

The most unique item in the kit is the Lug-Lok Vise Block. This block fits into the barrel chamber to give you a solid base to remove/replace barrel nut work on the upper receiver without stressing the pivot pins or indexing pin on the barrel. I have seen bad things happen when you over torque these points. Note to use the Lug-Lok, the receiver extension must be removed.

Other handy tools include Pivot Pin Tool and lock, a safety flag, front sight tool and Smart Vise Block. This block is unique because it can be tensioned to fit mag wells to reduce shake when working on the upper receiver or installing new optics. You can invert it to make installing a pistol grip or work on the lower receiver easier. Whoever you give this $249.99 gift to will think of you every time they use it, especially when it makes working on their AR easier.

Not everyone owns an AR, perish the thought; but if you are reading this odds are you own more than one firearm. That means you need a tool kit specifically designed for firearms. Yes you can have Allen wrenches and numerous screwdrivers from big box stores but they are not firearms specific. Most Allen sets do not fit the nuts on scopes and various firearms. The screwdrivers you find at big box stores are not designed for screws used in on scopes and firearms. Not to damage these screws you need properly designed tools.  The tools found in Avid’s Real Driver 90 are built for working on firearms not cars or around the house.

If you do not want to strip firearms screws you need bits that truly fit the screws. When I say fit, they need to be squared not tapered to the tool end like wood working/mechanics tools. Square blades fill the entire screw slot to reduce the odds of stripping the head and evenly applying pressure to the entire screw head. This ensures that you apply even pressure to the entire surface area, helping prolong the life of the screws and screw holes. The same is true for Philip’s head screws. They too are generally flat at the bottom of the screw, a pointed it will slip and strip the head.

While you can buy Allen wrench sets, most are not small enough for the screws and bolts that secure scope bases and adjustment screws. I have discussed many mini red dot scopes when I cannot zero them because I forgot the OEM wrench.

To ensure you keep the screw blade in the slot, Real Avid has a “force assist” which is another driver to fit into the handle. This will allow you to get extra torque on stubborn screws. If you need a smaller driver handle tool bits will fit this grip. The button in the handle of the main driver is a light to illuminate your immediate work area. I found this to be most useful at the range where lighting is not optimal for field repairs and adjustments. The Real Driver 90 is worth every penny of its $99.99 MSRP because it will save time and aggravation.

Real Avid’s tools generally come in a secure case, while their Glock Tool folds like a pocket knife. Instead of a cutting blade the four blades are tools. There is a punch, front sight driver, flat blade driver and .050” Allen wrench. The 3/16” magnetic hex wrench fits front sight nuts, while the Allen wrench tightens most aftermarket rear sights; the flat blade removes the locking block and works on adjustable rear sights while the punch is to remove pins.

Real Glock Tool literally is a complete tool kit for a Glock in your pocket. I cannot count the number of times this $24.99 tool would have come in handy to help fellow shooters at a match or just plinking at the range. Just saving one loose front sight when it is loose will cover the cost of this tool.

Since using Real Avid’s Pistol and Rifle Tools, I have been a fan. They are worth every penny and are tools I use regularly. You will find them to be some of the best and most innovative in the industry.

Oppressive antigun measures do not promote public safety

(from theregister.co.uk)

[Ed: This piece is excerpted from a much longer, and well worth reading, seven-part series first published by our colleagues at The Arbalest Quarrel on February 6, 2019.] 

Oppressive antigun measures do not promote public safety

Removal of guns from society won’t promote public safety. It never has; never will. (See . . .“The Failed Experiment, Gun Control and Public Safety in Canada, Australia, England and Wales,” Public Policy Sources (Number 71, November 2003), by Gary A. Mauser.) And, if, perchance, someone could prove, by argument, it did, it would never be worth the price of sacrificing our sacred rights and liberties. But, they can’t prove that draconian gun control measures will ever make the individual or . . . society as whole . . . any safer.

[Many a]ntigun politicians . . . probably [know that], but pretend otherwise. It fits the[ir] narrative . . . [even though]. . . the statistical evidence patchy at best. So antigun proponents squash debate, offering simplistic slogans in lieu of facts; in lieu of sound reasoning. . . . Many Americans want to believe the[ir] lies. Cognitive dissonance and confirmation bias kicks in to assist the gun grabbers’ false messaging.

Antigun zealots reduce discussion to two simple, basic declarations, one the corollary of the other: arms expansion endangers the public; arms reduction promotes public safety. Americans hear the message often. Through vehement exhortation and constant repetition the gun grabbers imprint their message on the public psyche.

The clarion call for mass arms reduction demands submission to governmental authority. Antigun proponents impel the public to rebel against their own best interests: to abandon a sacred right. They promise societal tranquility and serenity, if Americans but heed their call.

They [also] crush dissent. A sacred right for them is an object of scorn, emblematic of a “gun culture.

Antigun measures target average law-abiding citizens, not the violent criminal

Millions of law-abiding, rational Americans cherish the fundamental, unalienable right of the people to keep and bear arms [and to] exercise that right. These citizens don’t cause gun violence. If they did, Americans would see carnage on a scale beyond that unleashed by psychopaths, terrorists, drug cartel members, and garden-variety criminals, living among us.

Antigun politicians should deal with these violent elements. They don’t.

Hundreds of antigun federal and State Statutes, and many more local codes, rules, regulations, and procedures have done little to curb gun violence. . . [S]uch measures target millions of average, law-abiding, rational Americans, who don’t commit gun violence.  Antigun measures do significantly less to target the fringe element of society, that do commit gun violence.

The idea that fewer firearms in the hands of everyone will reduce gun violence is erroneous. [But f]or many people, the argument has an aura of plausibility, as so many wrong theories do. Consider instances of violent crime in the EU, and in Mexico and Central American Countries. The citizenry of these Nations has suffered, notwithstanding strict regulation of firearms.

And, no matter how many restrictive gun measures exist, it is never enough.

Antigun politicians call for ever more restrictive gun legislation. They direct antigun legislation [at] the law-abiding, rational American citizen. They maintain the pretense that once no law-abiding, rational American citizen has access to firearms, every law-abiding, rational American will be the better for it; will be safe and secure.

It is the mass of citizenry that antigun politicians seek to control; even if they state it is the criminal, the sociopath, the lunatic they seek to constrain and restrain. The extent and nature of antigun legislation bears this out. . . They seek to control the citizenry because they are distrustful of it.

This distrust in the Nation’s citizenry, in whom ultimate authority and power resides, consistent with the will of the founders of a free Republic, the founders of an indestructible Constitution, is endemic among those who espouse a collectivist agenda, reflected in totalitarian societies that have forever espoused strong Government control over . . . the citizenry. Societies structured on the precepts of Socialism, Communism, and Fascism exemplify this. Despite the subtle differences in economic and political ideology of these various totalitarian systems, they are all grounded on the notion of Collectivism—consisting of a set of precepts, completely at odds with those that define Individualism.

It was through application of the latter set of precepts, those grounded on Individualism, not the former, those grounded on Collectivism, that our founders drafted a Constitution upon which our Nation was founded and on which a great Nation has long stood. The new radical Left in this Country, . . . seeks to turn on its head all that our founders have accomplished.

Of the enumerated fundamental, unalienable rights, Leftist politicians know, the one etched in the Second Amendment is most difficult to dislodge. But these politicians are tenacious.

Leftists abhor the Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights of the U.S. Constitution, more so than any other elemental right set forth in the Bill of Rights, because [it] constitutes the greatest threat to their accumulation of power and their ability to maintain power over the American people.

The three antigun planks

Although gun laws enacted by Congress, State Legislatures, and subordinate bodies of the States, are numerous and complex, the strategy undergirding them is simple. That strategy has three primary planks. Each Governmental measure falls into one or more planks, and Leftist, antigun politicians . . . often pursue all three planks simultaneously. These three planks are as follows:

One, continually expand the domain of banned firearms, ammunition, and firearms’ components and paraphernalia. 

Two, continually expand the domain of individuals who cannot lawfully own or possess firearms, ammunition, and firearms’ components and paraphernalia. 

Three, . . . make the exercise [of the right to keep and bear arms] so onerous, so pernicious, so expensive, that few of these individuals will wish to continue to do so.

Through it all, there may be a silver lining for those of us who cherish the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. . . .

[T]he Conservative wing on the United States Supreme Court will [we believe] continue to review antigun laws that impermissibly impinge on and infringe the Second Amendment, and . . . strike down unconstitutional laws, rules, regulations, codes, and procedures. The U.S. Supreme Court has done remarkably well with the issuance of favorable rulings in the seminal Heller and McDonald cases. While reluctant to take up any Second Amendment case since then until very recently, the fact that the high Court has now voted, finally, to hear a straightforward Second Amendment case, in the decade since Heller and McDonald, this may very well augur a good sign for things to come, apropos of preservation of our sacred Bill of Rights. . . (See our article, posted recently, titled, “U.S Supreme Court To Hear New York Gun Case; Mainstream Media Visibly Worried.”)

We must let Republicans in Congress and in State Government [and] the President know, too, that . . . preserving and strengthening the Second Amendment is . . . critical to the safeguarding of a Free Republic, and the safeguarding of our Nation’s Constitution, and the safeguarding of our Country’s core values, history, and traditions .

.

.

Robert B Young, MD

— DRGO Editor Robert B. Young, MD is a psychiatrist practicing in Pittsford, NY, an associate clinical professor at the University of Rochester School of Medicine, and a Distinguished Life Fellow of the American Psychiatric Association.

All DRGO articles by Robert B. Young, MD

Meopta USA Sport Optics Introduces Straight-Body MeoPro HD 80 Spotting Scope

TAMPA, FL, February 27, 2019 – Meopta USA Sport Optics is pleased to introduce a straight-body model of its award-winning MeoPro HD 80 spotting scope. Originally available in angled-body only, the MeoPro HD 80 spotting scopes feature a one-piece design with a fixed 20x – 60x eyepiece.   The large 80mm fluoride objective lens delivers maximum light transmission and razor-sharp resolution in low light while eliminating color fringing, making it easy for hunters to assess game at long distances.

The MeoPro HD 80 has a rugged, fully-armored magnesium alloy body, and Centric-Drive™ mid-body focus control that is easy and fast to use, even with gloves on.  MeoBright™ ion-assisted multi-coatings eliminate glare and reflections while delivering exceptional color fidelity. Meopta’s MeoDrop™ hydrophobic lens coating ensures the highest level of visual clarity in the field, easily repelling rain, snow, skin oils and dirt while the MeoShield™ anti-abrasion lens coating protects external lens surfaces from scratches.

“We are excited to finally offer our customers a choice between angled and straight body in our MeoPro HD 80 spotting scope,” said Randy Garrison, Director of Meopta USA Sport Optics.  “The MeoPro HD 80 is a high-performance spotter that has been a big seller for us. Hunters, optics experts, guides and outfitters quickly recognized the exceptional value of this optic when we introduced the first model, and we continue to deliver European-quality optics at great price points across all of our lines.”

Meopta’s MeoPro HD 80 spotting scopes are nitrogen purged, waterproof, fogproof and shockproof.  The MeoPro HD 80 is available separately or as part of a kit that contains the new Meopta Carbon Fiber Tripod with ball head and pan-tilt head, universal smartphone adapter and premium carrying case, in addition to the spotting scope.

Retail Pricing:

MeoPro HD 80 Spotting Scope (Straight or Angled): $1,599.95

MeoPro HD 80 Spotting Scope / Carbon Fiber Tripod Kit: $1,699.95

Specifications:

Objective Lens (mm): 80mm fluoride lens

Eyepiece:         Integrated 20x-60x eyepiece with twist-up eyecup

Body type:         Straight

Lens Coatings: MeoBright, MeoDrop, MeoShield

Close Focus (ft):         26.2 ft

Focus control:         CentricDrive, oversized, mid-body

Chassis material:        Magnesium alloy

Armor:        Full rubber armor

Tripod Collar:         Rotating, integrated tripod foot (no adapter required)

Tripod Thread: ¼ – 20

Waterproof:         yes

Nitrogen Purged:         yes

Shockproof:         yes

Exit Pupil (mm):         Min – 1.4mm, Max – 4.05mm

Dioptric Compensation: +/- 5

Eye Relief (in):         0.73 in

FOV (degrees):         Min – 2.06º, Max – 1.26º

FOV ft. @1000 yds. Min – 107.9 ft.  Max – 66 ft.

Apparent FOV (degrees): Min – 40º, Max – 65º

Twilight Transmission (%): 87

Length w/eyepiece (in): 15.2 in

Weight (oz):         68 oz

About Meopta

Meopta has been producing high-end European optics for over 85 years. Meopta is a leading manufacturer & partner to many of the world’s finest optical brands. Meopta conceives, develops and manufactures precision optical and electro/optical systems for semiconductor, medical, aerospace and military industries as well as for consumer markets. For more information regarding Meopta, please visit www.meoptasportsoptics.com.


Shotgun 101 – She’s All About the Shuck-Shuck

When it comes to firearms, usually I am in the position of learner not teacher, but I had my very own adventure in mentorship last weekend. I took my adult daughter to the shotgun field for a +ONE day.

For those who haven’t heard of it, the +ONE Movement is a mentorship initiative launched by the National Shooting Sports Foundation. This goes hand-in-glove with the websites letsgoshooting.org and letsgohunting.org, and is aimed at increasing the ranks of shooters and hunters by having experienced folks bring another person (plus one) into the ranks.

Both of my daughters learned 9mm handgun several years ago under the tutelage of Babes With Bullets Camp, but neither one had ever handled or shot a shotgun before. (I’ve only been doing it myself for 3 or 4 years). This daughter (the forestry major) had expressed an interest in starting to learn hunting with me, so we ventured out together on a recent Saturday afternoon.

I brought four of my shotguns to the range for her to try. 

A Benelli 828U 12 gauge

A Benelli ETHOS 12 gauge

My late father’s now vintage Remington 870 Wingmaster 20 gauge

A Mossberg 500 20 gauge Bantam/Youth that I found at a pawnshop

After refreshing her on the Four Rules of Gun Safety and how they applied to shotguns versus pistols, I introduced her to each style of shotgun in turn. We started with my over and under Benelli, then progressed to the pump guns, up to the semiauto. 

Trying the 12 ga O/U

This girl (she may be 27, but she will always be my little girl) was all about the shuck-shuck. You should have seen the grin when she racked that first pump gun!

As we worked our way through my guns, she “liked” my Benelli 828U, and she appreciated the heritage of her grandfather’s gun, but racking that Mossberg became her new mission. 

The Mossberg 500 Youth Wins!

The way she explained the pump preference to me was that unlike the OU or the semiauto, when she racked a new shell with the pump she KNEW she was ready to go. She also liked that on the 500 the safety was on the tang for thumb operation. It seemed more natural to her.

That is also my personal preference. For me, I don’t want to be fumbling around with my trigger finger, looking for the safety. I don’t want to do ANYTHING with my trigger finger except index it straight, or pull the trigger. A thumb-operated safety allows for that.

The youth stock Mossberg fit her comfortably, and that’s the gun she stuck with the rest of the time we were on the range. It was a cold Saturday with temps in the 30’s, so we had the shotgun field all to ourselves for two whole hours. She just kept asking for more shells and we kept setting up more clays on stands.

I was actually thankful for our solitude. I didn’t want her to feel any pressure at all from well-meaning strangers. We took our time, she got to try a new skill at her own pace, and we didn’t have an “audience”. Because we were alone I also let her shoot from a seated position as if she were at the base of a tree, hunting squirrels.

Her New Favorite Gun

The girl shot almost 75 shells on her first time out before her arms started getting tired. I was so proud of her! I checked in with her by text the next day and she said she wasn’t even too sore. That’s my girl … 

Next time maybe we’ll work on some flying clays, but I need to get her to an actual shotgun instructor now too. I don’t want to let too many of my own bad habits get ingrained in her and I don’t know how to “fix” things like little aiming issues with shotguns.

I’ll leave the rest to the professionals, but it was an auspicious beginning that I hope will be the start of great adventures for her in the future. She’s even got her hunter safety course all lined up already! Judging by the grin, I think we’ve got a permanent +ONE.

Why? LPVO or Red Dot: Sage Dynamics

The Low Power Variable Optic (LPVO) is coming into its own in the shooting community in force at the moment and the questions keep rolling in as to… why?

Why do I need this high priced LPVO optic compared to a red dot or fixed power sight? Even in the affordable optics categories lower cost LPVOs are 2x-3x the cost of a dot.

Do I need this?

Aaron Cowan over with Sage Dynamics takes an objective look at some of the information surrounding this question. (Yes he says LVPO not LPVO, we’re a dyslexic bunch and we talk a LOT for a living, same same)

But incase you don’t want to watch the video (shame on you) this gist of it centers on a few points

  • An LPVO can do everything a red dot sight can to nearly the same efficiency a red dot can. The only thing the red dot excels at functionally is the issue of eye relief.
  • A red dot cannot do everything an LPVO can, especially when it comes to target observation at any significant distance. You can hit a static target at distance with irons, a red dot, or an LPVO, but only the magnified optic will give you the ability to discern detail. After about 50 yards positive identification with the unaided eye gets harder and harder without extra information.
  • Mission requirement is a very important point. If the rifle you are equipping is not meant to push outside a short distance defensive envelope, a red dot serves your needs just fine. If you want the rifle, even SBR, to have enhanced capability beyond the unaided vision distances a LPVO is a better option

For a quick run down out of my personal inventory:

  • My SCAR 16: My go to all purpose rifle runs an ACOG. I’m favoring my training bias on this one but the TA31 gives me greater vision over distance while I can still shoot CQ with the Bindon Aiming Concept, BAC is a learned skill just like mastering a DA/SA trigger but it is still my preference.
  • My LWRCi PSD: My “EDC” rifle is an SBR running a TA44 1.5X ACOG, it’s essentially a red dot +. The TA44 gives a small advantage at slightly greater distances over red dots but is functionally still in the shorter distance envelope. I’ve been equally happy running an Aimpoint CompM5 in that role too. Close distances set up.
  • My SCAR 17: Running a LPVO/MPVO US Optics B-10 the advantages on detail observation at all distance beyond 50 meters are substantial. Detail becomes key in a shoot no shoot whether you are engaging a threat or picking your shot on a game animal. The only real trade offs are weight and hands off control.

Jase Winner @ SHOT Show 2019

What’s up Party Peeps!?  Jase here and this is my SHOT Show 2019 report.

SHOT Show was… an experience (a really awesome experience I might add). There was a lot to see and a even more going on. Thousands of products and tens of thousands of people. There was seriously so much going on that if you looked at any one thing too closely, or for too long, you missed a bunch of other stuff because there are only so many hours in a day. Prioritizing your to do/ to see/ to meet list is a real thing. In order to really break down SHOT Show and try to understand/explain what all went on I’ve broken it down into three parts.

The products.

The people.

And the experiences.

So here we go, SHOT Show through the eyes of a 15 year old shooter.

THE PRODUCTS

Guns, gear, and random stuff. From the useful to the straight outrageous it was all there packed into the Sands Convention Center. I saw a lot of really cool stuff, a bunch of just stuff, and even a few pieces of “What the heck is that?” stuff. But realistically the single best part about the products was getting to “play with” all of the items I had seen online or heard about from friends.

Take the Walther Q5 SF, Bill Blowers of Tap-Rack-Tactical (check him out if you want to be a better shooter, or just better at life) has been plastering the Interwebs about this gun like it’s the best thing since sliced bread. Well when I finally got to hold it and feel the gun, trigger, etc… BAM! Suddenly I understood and now I’m totally hooked on it because it’s a pretty fantastic pistol. 

Nighthawk’s pistols were another one of those companies that I had heard much about but not really experienced (dumping a magazine of ammo after class with Steve Fisher doesn’t really count, especially if I didn’t know it was a Nighthawk). It was nice to spend a couple of days talking to the Nighthawk crew and checking out the hardware.  Ergonomics, form, function and overall awesomeness of the slides and triggers… Yep, you know I’m a Nighthawk fan now!

Knights Armament Rifles, I knew who they were but didn’t understand how great a weapon system their SR15 was until my new buddy Ash Hess broke it all down for me. I’m definitely a fan of that ambidextrous life, so KAC had me. They were ambi, balanced, and built for hard use. They were beautiful.

UNITY Hot Button & UNITY 2.26” FAST Mounts, these WILL be on my Tac rifle sooner or later… The HOT Button is genius, it’s one of those simple items that make you ask why it wasn’t developed sooner. The 2.26” high mounts are awesome and the In-Line Magnifier mount is super slick.   

I’ve got an Aimpoint PRO waiting for a FAST mount and am saving up for my Magnifier for the In-Line mount. Mr. Josh was an excellent source of info at the UNITY/TNVC booth and definitely sold me on all three products (which wasn’t hard to do when I already sold myself lol). When it comes to UNITY & TNVC… Josh and Chip are definitely my go to guys!

Aimpoint optics (ACRO-P1…Want, want want!), Marlin Rifles (an 1894 in .357/ .38 with Midwest Rail is in my future… probably the distant future, but my future non the less!), B.E. Meyers MAWL (How cool is it that I got a guided tour of the MAWL from my good friend Chuck Pressberg!), Vertx Gamut bag and tourist jeans (in depth look at the products brought to you by Mr. Ron at Vertx), Victory First V43 & V17 slides(and lots of quality convo time with Mr. Matt), ect. 

All of these things I had seen on the internet but hadn’t really gotten to feel and understand and work through the products. SHOT Show gave me that opportunity. You know what else SHOT Show gave me, a really long and very expensive shopping list for the next year, but that just gives me something to work towards I guess. (OK seriously, who needs their lawn cut, wood chopped or pool cleaned… anyone need a kidney?)

‘That Guy’ Again.. Still.. Don’t Be That Guy

AUSTIN (KXAN) — A man was arrested Saturday after allegedly firing a new gun he purchased into the ground to “test it out”, according to Austin police.

Dumb, drunk, and armed do not mix well.

Police responded a call of shots fired at 5005 Good Wood Drive in southeast Austin. When officers arrived at the scene they reported that several neighborhood residents were ducking for cover. They told officers that they witnessed a suspect walking down the street with a handgun.

I cannot fathom a reason to so recklessly take a ride to prison. Don’t do it. Be sure to tell your friends too that legendary newsworthy stupidity is to be avoided.

When officers approached the house the reported shots came from, a man matching the suspect’s description emerged. According to police, Arnoldo Tolico, 54, was visibly intoxicated and stumbling when officers approached him.

After questioning, Tolico admitted to police that he fired his new gun from his home into the ground because he wanted to “test it out.” Police found 29 bullet casings on Tolico’s back porch.

Again… no… just no. Don’t be Arnoldo Tolico in your mindset towards firearms handling.

Tolico is charged with discharge of a firearm in certain municipalities. 

Most municipalities have rules governing shooting and all of them require sobriety. I have plenty of friends with backyard gun ranges. I have plenty of friends who don’t have those too because their property and their hometown do not and cannot safely support such an establishment or practice.

Monday PSA: Don’t. Be. That. Guy… Still… Again… Forever

Universal Background Checks?

(from bila.com)

Like many of the rallying cries used by opponents of the right to keep and bear arms, the call for “universal background checks” is a deliberate misrepresentation.  While at first blush UBC legislation may sound appealing, the proposal is actually a ruse.

Federal law already requires that licensed dealers conduct a National Instant Background Check System (NICS ) check for all firearms sales.  Dianne Feinstein et al claim that a law requiring the same check for all private firearms transactions—sales, temporary loans, or even simply handing someone an unloaded gun to admire—would somehow make America safer.  This simply isn’t true. 

The U.S. murder rate has ticked back downward slightly in the last two years after a brief increase, and is about half what it was at its peak in 1980.  Nevertheless, about 17,000 people are murdered in the US each year.  There are close to 100,000 rapes, and over 300,000 robberies.  A lot of people commit violent crimes in this country.  

While everyone would like to “keep guns out of the hands of the wrong people”—and robbers, rapists and murderers are clearly “the wrong people”—one cannot reasonably believe that people willing to commit robbery, rape, or murder would be unwilling to buy or sell a gun without government permission. 

How do “the wrong people” typically get their guns?  According to one 2015 study based on interviews with inmates in Cook County, Illinois, about 10% or so purchased their crime guns from licensed dealers, and were in fact subjected to NICS background checks.  90% or more of those firearms were acquired through illegal means.  Some of those were stolen, but the majority were obtained from people who knew they are engaging in illegal transactions.   A 2016 study,from the DOJ produced similar findings.

For example, with or without a NICS check, it is against the law to sell or give a firearm to someone that you know, or should know, is not allowed to own a gun (a “prohibited person”).  It is already illegal to knowingly provide a gun to any prohibited person, by any means, even if they’re your cousin, son or best friend.  Just loaning them a firearm is a federal crime.

These transactions provide over 90% of guns used in crimes in this country, and won’t be impacted by a UBC law.  Because they are already illegal, the people engaging in them will simply “opt out” of any such requirement.  “Universal background checks” will never be “universal”.

The leaders of the civilian disarmament movement are already aware that UBC laws are futile.   How do we know that?  Because several states already have such laws in place, and the effects of those laws on violent crime have been analyzed.  Three separate studies, performed by researchers with well-established anti-Second Amendment bona fides, found no evidence that UBC laws were associated with any decrease in the rate of homicides or suicides committed with firearms.

If anti-gunners in Congress and the media already know that “Universal Background Checks” won’t keep guns out of criminals’ hands, then why do they push for it?  This is a question that can be answered by applying a little logic.

There are probably over 400 million firearms in private hands in the United States, though no one actually knows how many.  Estimates range from 300 million to over 600 million.  We don’t know because there is no national registry of firearms and owners.  Creating such a registry is forbidden by the 1986 Firearms Owners Protection Act (FOPA).   And without a registry of all firearms and owners, there can be no way to prove whether any specific firearm changed hands without a background check. 

Since a UBC law would clearly be useless without a national registry of all firearms, the logical conclusion is that those pressing for a federal UBC law , completely aware of its futility, are doing so as a prelude to demanding the passage of a subsequent law requiring the registration of all firearms, as noted recently by U.S. Representative Guy Reschenthaler (R-PA).

Prohibited persons would no more register their firearms than they would subject themselves to background checks, knowing they would fail.  But it’s not only logic that tells us that such a registry would only affect legal gun owners.  More absurd still, not only will “the wrong people” simply refuse to participate in any of these schemes, they are not even breaking the law by doing so! 

In the 1968 decision Haynes v U.S.,  the Supreme Court held that prohibited persons could not be convicted for failing to register NFA weapons—machine guns, short barreled rifles and shotguns, suppressors—because requiring them to do so would violate their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.

So only law abiding gun owners can be prosecuted for failing to register firearms! In fact, after Haynes, the 1934 NFA (National Firearms Act) was amended to stipulate exactly that, and in subsequent cases, the same restriction has been applied to state firearms registration laws.  Per the U.S. Supreme Court, firearms registration laws only apply to law abiding gun owners.  They do not apply to “the wrong people”.

While this legal Catch-22 is likely news to many, including gun owners, it is very unlikely that the leaders of the civilian disarmament movement are unaware of it.

So what is the real reason for the push for UBCs?  Why bother to expend political capital to attempt to promote such laws, which cannot work, and which have been proven ineffective by multiple research studies? 

UBC legislation is nothing more than a stepping stone to demanding universal gun registration (UGR).  And a national firearms registry has only one purpose: to construct a legal framework that can be used to disarm law abiding gun owners.  So-called “Red Flag Gun Laws” are one such tool, and unless and until they are struck down by the courts, they will continue to spread.  But UBCs, and the subsequent UGR law that will be subsequently demanded, will be a much more powerful weapons against law abiding Americans.

We have already seen what the response of law abiding gun owners is to firearms registration requirements.  Laws requiring registration of modern sporting rifles in Connecticut and New York have been almost universally ignored by the citizenry, as have laws requiring registration of bump-stocks in Vermont, New Jersey and Denver.  Laws which also, as we know, do not even apply to “the wrong people”.

Laws such as these will convert the overwhelming majority of American gun owners—who, based on nearly all of human history, will correctly interpret these schemes as a civilian disarmament program— into felons with the stroke of a pen.  And, per Haynes, those same laws will have zero impact on already prohibited persons.

What the people claiming to want “gun control” actually want is people control.  They want to run others’ lives and control their decisions.  They want to remake the world according to their own beliefs and prejudices.  No straws, no raw milk, but before any of that can happen . . . absolutely NO GUNS.  “Universal Background Checks” are just a good first stepping stone.

.

.

—Tom Vaughan, MD is a neuroradiologist in private practice in Louisville, KY.  He is a shooting enthusiast who believes in individual liberty and personal responsibility.

All DRGO articles by Tom Vaughan, MD

Boots to Meet Your Needs

           

            Every year we trek to Las Vegas to the SHOT Show to see the latest and greatest in firearms, clothing, ammunition, range gear and footwear. It seems footwear is one of the areas of SHOT that never disappoints, thanks to new technology and redesigning perennial favorites. Two established players in the footwear arena are 5.11 Tactical and Interceptor.

            Unfortunately we are in the midst of a nasty winter so I could not put these boots through a lot of wear testing. If it was not brutally cold out, it was snowing or raining. I did not want to take a spill seeing how the boots feel. However we did get a few breaks so I could get out and give them abbreviated workouts.

            First up was 5.11 Tactical’s Cable Hiker Carbon Tac. 5.11 Tactical has been offering boots for duty, hiking and range use for well over a decade. Over the half dozen years 5.11 has started building boots for shooters, hunters, hikers using the technology and proven designs in their duty/uniform line. The Cable Hiker Carbon Tac Toe is one of first boots available for 2019.

            I am not a fan of protective hard toes, because I had to wear steel toed boots for a position I had when I first left the service. Back in the early nineties there were very few choices for protective toes, pretty much steel toes were it.  Those of you who have worn steel toes know they are heavy, hot in the summer and cold in the winter. Neither of these factors makes you want to wear protective toes unless they are required. Even no-metallic toes were not the most comfortable because they were just as heavy and uncomfortable as steel toes. Fortunately non-metallic toes have made great strides in comfort. They have also started meeting various industrial safety standards. Both of these factors have led more folks in both industrial and non-industrial settings to start wearing them. 5.11’s Cable Hiker Carbon Tac (CHCT) is one of the boots that I would call a leader in the non-industrial market. Because of their heritage, they are also a boot I would suggest to you; the readers.

            What caught my attention about the CHCT is its weight. They weigh a few ounces more than the non-protective toe version. While you know there is a hard protective toe cap, it does not feel like a steel toed boot. I am certain this is because not as much material is needed to wrap the cap. You say the boot liner wraps the cap which is true; however the cap needs wrapped first so the sharp edges will not rub on the boot. This decreases the toe box area, which makes the boot less comfortable. With the carbon toe cap, this wrap can be thinner which increases room in the toe box; which increases foot comfort.

            The other major factor that makes the CHCT attractive to the end user is, first it is a hiking boot, not a protective boot masquerading as a hiking boot. What this means is you get a hiking boot with a 30mm thick with 10mm of EVA for cushioning and a 16mm forefoot. When you have these thicknesses or the forefoot to heel ratio of approximately a half inch your feet and legs do not get fatigued like they do in boots that have nearly zero heel lift. You can see this heel lift when you look at the CHCT.

            To further aid in comfort 5.11 uses their time tested Ortholite insole. Ortholite does not crush down like many other materials used in insoles. It offers a high degree of shock absorption without adding addition weight.

            Another feature of the CHCT is the Speed Urban outsole. This sole is non-marking, slip and oil resistant. I found it to give good traction in the snow and ice the Polar Vortex that created me when I returned from the SHOT Show. If I was slip sliding away in that mess, I am sure the CHCT will be surefooted in all but the worst conditions on the range or in the field.

            Overall 5.11 Tactical’s Cable Hiker Carbon-Tac is a comfortable solid boot. With the protective carbon toes cap, I can see this boot becoming a favorite of a match’s “Mr. Fix-it”. The toe cap will undoubtedly save toes from dropped tools, parts for props or other weighty surprises that could cause a major ouch on the range or in the field. The only thing the CHCT lacks is a waterproof membrane, but that will add additional cost to the $139.99 MSRP. Even without this I still would recommend 5.11 Tactical’s Cable Hiker Carbon Toe if you are looking for protective footwear for the range, field or daily wear.

            The other boot that caught my eye was Interceptor’s Frontier Tactical Boot. The Frontier is AR 670-1approved. Too many old Vets being “Army approved” might make you think of those black cruit boots we wore in the sixties through the early nineties. Today this standard means boots must meet certain standards for color, shock absorption, wear and comfort; not just be the cheapest black boot the Army can buy.

            While looking at the Frontier my initial thought was it feels like a comfortable running shoe with a boot shaft. The boot is flexible, lightweight, offers good support and the aggressive outsole should give good traction. The sole wraps up the toe so you can get an aggressive toe off when running in them.

           A closer look at the boot revealed the midsole to be polyurethane. This is generally a material used in vastly more expensive boots, not something I would expect to see in a boot selling for $43.23 at walmart.com. Polyurethane reduces weight while giving good shock absorption. Coupled with Enduro Pro Anit-Fatigue foot bed, the end user should have all day comfort. For good or bad with my beat-up knees I quickly notice when boots do not offer good shock absorption. I was able to walk a couple miles a day when we had a few decent days here. I was not achy or worn-out so the Frontier gets two thumbs up.

            The upper of the Frontier is nylon and suede. The ankles have to stability strips that wrap around the ankles. This allows you to snug the boot up to help prevent rolling your ankle. There are air vents in the arch area of the boot to keep your feet comfortable in hot weather.

            Overall I was impressed with both 5.11 Tactical’s Cable Hiker Carbon Tac and Interceptor’s Frontier Tactical Boot. If I were the “Mr. Fix It” for a club or major match, I would wear the CHCTs. They would save the toes from dropped hammers, dropped steel plates etc. For those who are looking for a value priced uniform boot or responsive boot for shooting in; Frontiers are an excellent choice.

As you can see from the brief review of these boots; manufactures are building boots to meet a wide variety of needs. Take some time to research footwear to meet your personal needs. Your body will thank you.

Benchmade Gets the Next Lesson in Self Immolation

Here we sit again…

Benchmade, a well known name in the circle of knives and the overlapping circle of the firearms owning community. Benchmade’s home is in Oregon, not a paragon for the 2A community…

When a state isn’t known for its 2A advocacy and support the police departments are viewed with a great deal of suspicion and distrust. The image, no matter the individual character of the officers and the department, is one of statist thug and not a protector of individual liberty.

So when a department celebrates with you destroying guns…

Police departments have policies in place. They have rules they must follow.

This does nothing to assuage the fact that some of the firearms destroyed could’ve been lawfully owned and unable to be reclaimed by their lawful owners due to bureaucratic nightmare. It does nothing to cover the fact that some of those guns should probably not have been scrapped.

Even if all the firearms in this case were legitimate crime guns not all the firearms destroyed fall into that category, and even one gun unreturned to a lawful owner at the hands of bureaucrats is a problem… a big problem. It poisons the well of public trust and that poison is now associated with Benchmade.

SEE OFFICIAL STATEMENT BELOW

Benchmade is aware of the recent post from our local Oregon City Police Department.

We apologize for the confusion and concern that this post created. These were firearms that the Oregon City Police Department had to destroy in alignment with their policies. Oregon City Police requested the use of specialty equipment within the Benchmade facility to follow these requirements, and as a supporting partner of our local police force, we obliged the request.

Benchmade is a proud and unwavering supporter of both law enforcement and Second Amendment rights. These are commitments that we do not take lightly and will continue to support well into the future.

When asked for clarity from Oregon City Police Department, Chief Jim Band made the following statement: “When property is to be destroyed, it is the policy of the Oregon City Police Department to destroy property, including firearms, in accordance to our procedures and ORS. The Oregon City Police Department does not sell firearms.”

-Benchmade

Emphasis Mine.

The OCP is following their rulebook. It was Benchmade’s call to help instead of politely declining. Deciding to help an entity of city and state authority that, in the broadspace of state political attitude and will, is anti-gun is a direct attack on already embattled 2A advocates… who also happen to make up a substantial portion of the Benchmade customer base.

Benchmade, you goofed. How do assure “We the People” and we the buyers that you support the Second Amendment when you will participate in the destruction of firearms for entities with a known hostility towards the 2A?

This doesn’t begin to address the allegation that Benchmade has supported anti-2A politicians within Oregon with their money. I have no confirming information for that rumor but it is flying.

We will see.

For further reminders of the bad idea fairy… remember X-Products?

Calls for gun death research funding are misguided

(from rightedition.com)

Ed: We are delighted to welcome to DRGO a precociously “woke” medical student, Tyler Watson, who has given his permission for us to post his recent article from The DO.

If we are going to advocate for restricting access to items for health reasons, let’s start with those that cause more deaths and aren’t as legally protected.

Recently, the Student Osteopathic Medical Association announced that it was joining with the Giffords organization to lobby for gun death research funding. The announcement compared gun deaths to “threats like car accidents, smoking, and sudden infant death syndrome,” along with an accusation that policymakers are “prioritizing firearms over patients.”

Guns vs. cigarettes, alcohol

Preventable causes of death include cigarette smoking(480,000 deaths annually), alcohol use (88,000), accidental poisoning (58,335), and motor vehicle traffic (40,327), and these are far more epidemic compared to gun deaths (39,773), particularly gun homicides (14,415).

It is hypocritical to call for research and political intervention on firearms when we have not yet conquered these other issues. In fact, banning cigarettes would, applying the same theory of gun control, save 12 times as many lives.

Extending this same reasoning to alcohol and automobiles, banning these items would save three times as many lives as banning firearms. Although “car control” may not be as popular as gun control, it would arguably save more lives.

The legal factor

With gun control, there’s also the legal factor to consider. The Second Amendment states: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

Further, the Supreme Court has held that “private citizens have the right under the Second Amendment to possess an ordinary type of weapon and use it for lawful, historically established situations such as self-defense in a home, even when there is no relationship to a local militia.”

The government has an obligation to protect Americans’ rights to own and use firearms. No such right or obligation exists for cigarettes, alcohol, or automobiles. If we are going to advocate for restricting access to or banning items in the name of public health, let’s start with items that cause more deaths and that aren’t as legally protected.

Federal dollars unnecessary

The campaign to bring in federal dollars isn’t entirely necessary either. The Giffords Law Center has done research without federal finding. It has established a rating criteria where each state gets a scorecard based on that state’s gun laws — A for tight gun regulations, F for few gun laws, and ranked each of the 50 states by the strength of their gun laws.

However, this rhetoric fails to address a basic premise: access to guns will necessarily increase gun death rates, but murder and overall death rates are more important factors to consider than simply gun death rates.

Urban areas have higher access to subways, leading to higher subway deaths—that doesn’t mean there is a subway problem, and focusing on “subway deaths” would neglect the fact that rural areas have higher mortality rates than urban areas. Similarly, focusing on “gun deaths” ignores the more basic issues of murder and death rates.

To look at the data, I compared the Giffords Law Center’s state scorecards and ranks to each state’s gun death rates and then compared Giffords’ state grades to factors that the organization cites in its campaign: suicide, murder, gun ownership (measured by NICS federal gun background checks), and death rates.

The only factor that correlated strongly was suicide (-0.7 Pearson coefficient); murder, gun ownership, and death rates were weakly correlated (ranging 0.15 to -0.22). To investigate further, I compared gun ownership to each of those rates, and found weak correlations to murder (0.07), gun deaths (0.23), suicide (0.14), and death (-0.05). This seems to indicate that states with higher gun ownership rates have little correlation, positive or negative, to any of these undesired effects.

Further searching showed some abnormalities that might be of interest: several states with “F” ratings actually have lower-than-average gun death and murder rates. These states also have a murder rate lower than the national average.

If it is evidence from research we need, we should start with the evidence from research we already have!

.

.

Tyler Watson, OMS II, attends Oklahoma State University College of Osteopathic Medicine. Mr. Watson’s article reflects his own opinions only, and not necessarily those of The DO or the American Osteopathic Association.

“The M14 is still the greatest…” Okay, But Really The M110

(Video: 9-Hole Reviews)

The Knight’s Armament M110 Semi Automatic Sniper System (SASS) was the formal acknowledgement by U.S. Forces that a semi-auto rifle was an effective and accurate precision platform with a great deal of utility.

The system, first fielded in 2008, has received a number of variants and upgrades but the core rifle is still a precision KAC Stoner AR-10/SR-25.

Accurate under sustained fire and with an effective range of 800 meters the SASS and rifles like it are filling a critical niche in precision weapons. Conventional wisdom said that only the sealed and unmoving lock up of a bolt action rifle could produce precision. While a good bolt action is incredibly accurate the SASS is allowing those slower fire precision systems to push the bounds with extreme distance calibers. Where rapid engagement is not nearly as critical a factor as first round engagement success is, the rifles have gone big bore while the SASS is filling the role where older 7.62x51mm bolt rifles once sat.

The increase in available sustained precision firepower inside the half mile envelope is incredible with the M110 and peer systems.

And if you would like your own just ask over at Operation Parts and get one on the way

Operation Parts M110

4,239… Firearms Discovered in Carry On Luggage by TSA in 2018.

Exterior

Ladies and gentlemen, a PSA from your humble editor..

Please check your firearms at the door while traveling.

You cannot fly while carrying a firearm or with one in your accessible carry-on baggage.

According to the TSA, in 2018, a record-setting 4,239 firearms were discovered in carry-on bags across the country. 

Firearms must be unloaded and locked in a hard-sided container and transported as checked baggage only.  

Firearms parts, including firearm frames and receivers, are prohibited in all carry-on baggage and must also be placed in checked baggage. YourErie.com

YourErie.com

Use a lockable case like in the title image and check your firearms under the plane using the process for the airline you are flying with.

Thank you.

No One Fights Alone: Jordan McNair Custom Charity Auctions

Nighthawk Custom, Wilson Combat, Guncrafter Industries, and STI Back Jordan McNair in His Battle With Cancer

Jordan and family

Titans have stepped into the ring.

Today they stand together as one to back their friend, Jordan.

“That these highly competitive companies have joined together is a testament to Jordan’s character and his place in our hearts. Jordan has impacted our lives and it’s our combined goal to show the world that, people helping people, is still the American way.” -Mark Stone, CEO Nighthawk Custom  

The Jordan McNair: “No One Fights Alone” Fundraiser is a one-of a kind collaboration and cooperation between some of the biggest names in the firearms industry. Nighthawk Custom, Wilson Combat, Guncrafter Industries, and STI have teamed up to each build and donate a unique firearm that has been engraved with the tagline “No One Fights Alone”

Jordan McNair is a 34 year-old young man from Berryville, AR who very recently found out that he has an inoperable form of cancer. He is a bright, hard working, and kind person who is known and liked by everyone in the community. Jordan is loving husband and father to a beautiful 1 year-old daughter. He and his family are still learning about the diagnosis and treatment plans, and during this time, he has been unable to work.

Jordan is a friend of many throughout these companies and we wanted to build unique guns that could be auctioned to help support him and his family through this trying time.

These guns all have matching engraving and paint finishes donated by Hillbilly223. This is truly a unique opportunity to have a one-of a kind firearm or collection that will help a good man and his family.

This auction is for the 1-of a kind Nighthawk Custom Agent 2 that has a unique bull barrel and is the first Agent 2 without a light rail!

This auction is for the 1-of a kind Guncrafter Industries 1911 in .45 ACP. It is a custom build featuring all fully machined parts and a custom finish to match the other guns in this series!

This auction is for the 1-of a kind Wilson Combat Super Sniper in 6.5 Creedmoor. It comes with Atlas Bipod, Vortex 6-24×50 Glass, and countless other upgrades!

This auction is for the 1-of a kind STI Edge 2011 Double Stack 9mm Pistol with a custom finish to match the other guns in this series!

All four of these items are one of a kind and exclusively available from these Gunbroker auctions.

All purpose built by the company teams to help Jordan.

If you were ever considering buying one of these fine firearms, now is the time to possess a truly unique piece and support a young man’s family as he tackles the fight for his life.

And for any who just want to help. GoFundMe

Baby-Faced Gang Members ARE Part of the Problem

A shared post crossed my social media feed this week. The post was from the Fresno, CA Police Department of a , and as of this writing the post was shared 25,000 times. The main reason it was shared so many times was because of the volume of humor and snark in the comments section related to the pictured kid’s appearance.

While the comments and snark about his age and size are funny on the surface, what isn’t funny about this is the fact that this kid is ALREADY a gang member and was ALREADY in possession of a stolen and loaded firearm.

It is kids like this that drive the “child death by firearm” data that Demanding Mommies, Bloomberg Inc. and Hoplophobes everywhere use to beat us over the head with. 

It is kids like this that Organized Medicine use as an excuse to invade our privacy and agitate for unconstitutional firearms laws. 

It is kids like this that the “DO SOMETHING” crowd really need to focus on, because this is where adolescent criminal behavior starts, and it is kids exactly like this that end up murdering each other and innocent bystanders in street and drug crime.

So while everyone’s busy making jokes, the Bloomies and their ilk are busy eroding OUR rights in the name of this kid and others like him who drive that child death by firearm data.

They blame US for that kid getting his hands on a “stolen” gun. (We’re all supposed to go through “Universal Background Checks” while a probably 15-year old juvenile criminal totes a revolver around in his pocket?)

Baby-faced gang member

They blame US and our lawful pursuits for that kid’s criminal activity. And they will most assuredly blame US when that kid shoots some other kid on the school yard over a drug deal gone bad in 2 or 3 years. Whereupon the press will most assuredly spread THIS photo far and wide showing this baby-faced kid and using emotional manipulation to imply his innocence. Any of this sound familiar?

Meanwhile we’re all still the “bad guys”. Still laughing?