You don’t have to wear a suit, or even a shirt with a collar in order to dress intentionally.
All it requires is a little thought and care. First and foremost, it’s making sure your clothing fits right. After that, it’s understanding what message your clothing is communicating to the world.
Being “put together” suggests a level of credibility and self-confidence that can be beneficial in daily life. It can also portray a level of control and authority that may help deselect you from criminal targeting, and if not, it can help ensure that you’re perceived as the “good guy” by bystanders.
Nobody’s saying you have to live your life in a necktie, or even that you have to spend hours a week planning your outfits. But once you have an understanding of your own personal style, you can curate your wardrobe so that your clothing reflects who you are, regardless if you’re in jeans or a full suit.
Prior to the 1950s, grenade launchers, as we know them now, weren’t really a thing. The military used rifle grenades, which were quite large and powerful. They also had mortars, which acted as indirect-fire weapons. Rifle grenades and mortars were both cumbersome, and the US Army sought to find a weapon that was more portable and offered more range. This led to the invention of the 40x46mm grenade and the T148 Grenade Launcher.
The same program and idea eventually led to the M-79 and the varied experimental under-barrel grenade launchers that eventually became the M203. We don’t hear a whole lot about the T148. Interestingly enough, the T148 predates the M-79, although the M-79 is a much simpler weapon. Using a somewhat strange configuration, the T148 offered troops a repeating 40mm grenade launcher.
The T148 used a harmonica gun configuration. Harmonica guns were early attempts at creating a percussion cap repeating weapon well before the revolver. They feature a slide with chambers bored into it. The slide moves right to left or left to right, depending on the gun, and as it slides, the varied chambers align with the bore for firing purposes. The T148 used a harmonic-style clip that held three rounds and fed from left to right.
History of the T148
This allowed the gunner to fire three rounds in a semi-auto fashion. As you’d imagine, being able to crank off three 40mm grenades rapidly in a fight could be a precious tool. LtCol Roy Rayle designed the Weapon and also helped develop the M14 and M60 machine guns. He joined Springfield Armory in 1953 and developed the T148 per a request by the US Army Fort Benning’s infantry board.
By 1958, they had a pilot lot of T148 grenade launchers, which were officially the T148E1 series. They featured 12-inch barrels, leaf sights, a grip safety, and a wood stock. The launcher weighed 8.41 pounds fully loaded and was 29.5 inches long. The weapon had an effective range of 400 meters and a minimum range of 50 meters to both arm and for safety’s sake.
It wasn’t unwieldy in terms of length and weight, but at a glance, the three-round clip hanging off the side looked destined to grab onto everything an infantryman would run into.
The weapon was tested and while it showed promise, the Army did find it to be somewhat bulky and unwieldy. Left-handed soldiers would most certainly be at a disadvantage. They continued development to create a T148E2 with small improvements. However, in 1959, the T148 program was effectively canceled.
The T148 Rides Again
Sure, the program was canceled, but Vietnam kicked off as the Cold War heated up. Asymmetric jungle warfare caused military forces to be creative and experiment with several weapon programs. When you look at some of the experimental weapons fielded, it looks like they were throwing stuff at the wall and seeing what sticks. According to most sources, about 300 T148s were produced between the E1 and E2 series.
While the program was canceled, the military did send some T148 grenade launchers to Vietnam. It’s important to differentiate between the Colt XM148 under-barrel grenade launcher and the T148. Why the two share a number is beyond me.
In Vietnam the T148 got its trial by fire. It was found to be awkward and fragile, as well as clumsy. The three-round clip design was great for the first three rounds, but it was awkward to reload. The soldier would have to manually eject the spent casings by depressing an extractor release. So, loading the gun was quite slow.
From a practical perspective, the M79 offered the same rate of fire when more than three rounds were fired. The M79 was lighter, easier to produce, less clumsy, and more reliable in the dense jungle.
The End Of Idea
The T148E1 and E2 were canceled twice, and after testing in Vietnam, the project was truly over. Four of the remaining T-148s reside in museums. The idea of a repeating grenade launcher didn’t die, and weapons like the China Lake were also tested. Even in the modern era, the repeating grenade launcher isn’t a favored weapon. Single shots still rule the roost outside of heavy machine guns. The T148 was one of many attempts for a concept that just doesn’t work well.
Benchmade just announced a new fixed-blade knife, the Dacian. It’s made from premium materials and designed for everyday carry. It’s built as an option for folks who prefer a fixed blade to a folder for their EDC kit.
The Benchmade Dacian
The Benchmade Dacian has a three-and-a-half-inch blade of CPM-MagnaCut Stainless Steel. It features a high grind and a spearpoint profile. The overall length is just over seven and a half inches. The Dacian comes with either Blue Denim or Canvas Micarta grip scales. The Blue Denim version has a satin-finish blade, while the canvas micarta handled version has a Blue Titanium finish.
The Dacian comes with a molded sheath with a high-retention clip. It’s set up for tip-down carry. It can be pocket-carried, clipped to the waistband of your pants, or attached to a pack strap.
The Benchmade Dacian is made in the USA and carries Benchmade’s lifetime warranty. MSRP is $300 for the Blue Denim model, and $320 for the Canvas Micarta version.
I’m not rich enough to impulse purchase guns in most situations. Sometimes, I see a deal I can’t pass up. Recently, I attended an auction/estate sale. Estate sales are often a great way to find guns, accessories, and ammo. Amid the auctions most guns went for a decent deal, but not decent enough for me to squeeze the trigger, pun intended. Then, the GZ-MAB came up for auction and received not a single bid.
I’m famously unathletic and was picked last for lots of teams, and 7th-grade Dodgeball still haunts me. With a heart full of empathy, I bid on the GZ-MAB. It went once, twice, and was mine for a mere 90 dollars. Empathy is one thing, but the gun also had some alternative appeal to me.
First, it was a .32 ACP, and I’ve made the .32 ACP a plank in my personality. (Speaking of Caleb, please convince Taurus to import the 57SC.) Second, it’s made in Spain, and I’ve recently become a fan of Spanish-produced pistols. Finally, it was 90 bucks. Hell, that’s what it costs to take my wife out to dinner in 2024.
The GZ-MAB – From France to Spain
MAB stands for Manufacture d’armes de Bayonne and is a French firm. As mentioned, my GZ-MAB is a Spanish-produced pistol. MAB produced the Model G and GZ until 1962. They licensed the designs to Echave y Arizmendi, which is located in Eibar, Spain. Because Europe is tiny, Bayonne is only about 90 minutes from Bayonne. Echave y Arizmendi became Echasa, which is stamped on my gun.
According to Ed Buffaloe of the Unblinking Eye, the French guns are considered the better guns. I certainly couldn’t tell you if that’s true or not. The GZ-MAB in my hands feels solid and looks decent. The finish appears to be weak, especially on the slide. The GZ-MAB series was never super popular and seemed to be pretty uncommon, dare I say rare. It’s one of those rare guns that is also not highly desirable.
It’s clear the GZ-MAB was produced in the wake of the popularity of the PP and PPK. The PPK, in particular, is an inspiration. Nothing about the PPK was revolutionary, but a combination of desirable features allowed it to stand out.
The GZ-MAB is a blowback-operated design with a fixed barrel that doubles as the recoil guide rod. The hammer-fired gun has a single action-only design rather than a PPK-style DA/SA gun. The GZ-MAB holds seven rounds of .32 ACP, has simple fixed sights, and a manual safety, but the slide doesn’t lock open when the last round is fired. The safety is on the frame and sits right above the magazine release.
To The Range
If you have to shoot a small, lightweight blowback-operated pistol, then I’d stick with .32 ACP. It has much less recoil than .380 ACP and more reliability than .22LR. It’s the perfect small pistol caliber. The GZ-MAB handles quite well and has very little recoil.
The little .32 ACP pistol has hardly any recoil. It’s very pleasant to shoot and easy to shoot rapidly. Your hand isn’t going to get tenderized by the GZ-MAB.
An intelligent design of the grip gives you a beavertail that stops hammer and slide bite. The little beavertail puts plenty of room between the web of your hand and the slide. Little guns, especially of this era, are well known for their slide bite when you use a high grip on the gun.
The Sights and Accuracy
The sights across the top are certainly sights. They are super small, and it’s no wonder why people used to say, “You won’t see your sights in a gunfight!” You can barely see them on a square range. If you take your time, you can align the small front sight with the small rear sight and make it work.
The trigger has a bit of takeup and a bit of a spongy feel to it. When you press the trigger, you feel almost a completely separate stage of the trigger. Once you’re past the stage, it moves into the wall, which breaks and fires. The trigger isn’t bad, but it is not great. The GZ-MAB shoots straight enough for a small gun.
I can hit a gong at 15 and even 20 yards. Beyond that, it is capable of hitting full-sized IPSC targets, but you won’t be throwing .32 into the A Zone. The sights make it tough to shoot quickly, and accuracy falls apart outside of seven yards when I push the pedal.
The Spaniard
If it was 1962 and I needed a deep concealment pistol, I could see myself armed with a GZ-MAB. It’s small enough to easily conceal and has hardly any recoil. It’s robust and well-made. The sights sucked, but most sights sucked in that era. The little gun is fun to shoot, and when they come up for sale, they seem to be cheap. If you want a cheap, fun little gun, grab a GZ-MAB.
Despite all of our best efforts and precautions, we might one day be faced with a situation we can’t handle on our own. In cases like that, we turn to the professionals. Here are some things you can do to help them help you.
Be Clear and Concise
When calling for help, such as via 911, try not to ramble or go off on tangents. Be clear about what is happening and why you need assistance. This will likely be an emotionally charged situation and you might not be thinking entirely clearly, but do the best you can.
“My name is Joe Smith. I’m calling from 123 Main. I think my dad is having a heart attack, and we need help.”
The emergency operator is going to have questions, so stay on the line and answer them to the best of your ability. Getting angry or frustrated with them is only going to delay things. If you or someone else is trained in first aid, render help as best you can until the professionals arrive on site.
If it is an active shooter type of situation and you are armed, when you call 911 be very clear about who you are, where you are, and what you are wearing. When officers arrive on scene, it is not a good idea to run toward them with a weapon in view. Instead, stay put and let them come to you, following to the letter any instructions you’re given.
Help them help you by giving them the information they need clearly and concisely.
Address Signage
I spent about 15 years working as a private detective. During my career, I served about 10,000 papers, such as subpoenas and court summonses. Much of my day was spent driving around looking for addresses. I tell you that to tell you this. There are a whole lot of people who are going to be in serious trouble if they need help from the rescue squad or fire department. In far too many cases, the house address just isn’t easy to see. Out in rural areas, it might be missing completely.
Drive by your home some night and take an objective look from the perspective of someone searching for your address. How easy are you to find in an emergency? Remember, GPS is not infallible. Most areas have ordinances on the books that dictate where and how house numbers are to be displayed. Following those rules is a good start.
Signs near the end of the driveway are easiest to spot. Mailboxes can get damaged over time from snowplows. Stickers can fall off or fade. Numbers on the house itself can be difficult to see at night. Fancy calligraphy style numbers are the worst and are of no help.
If possible, it helps to station someone outside to flag down the first responders. This can be especially important if the responders need to be guided to the backyard or some other location. In a high-stress situation, it often works best to appoint specific people to perform specific tasks. Instead of just yelling for someone to run outside to watch for the ambulance, point to someone and say their name. “Mike, go out to the driveway and flag them down when they get here!”
Help them help you by making it easy to find your home in an emergency.
More is More
The more you can do to get first responders on site quickly and well-informed, the faster they’ll be able to render aid. Doing so will hopefully go a long way toward making your worst day at least a little easier to handle.
Suppressors have been used in war since the punitive expedition against Pancho Villa. They’ve slowly grown from specialty tools to general-issue items. During Vietnam, the need for suppressors exploded. The military was more than willing to experiment with suppressors and odd platforms in the quest for a quiet killer. This includes a rather interesting carbine created by Sionics. The Sionics Silent Carbine was one of the more interesting weapons used during the Vietnam War.
The War in Vietnam saw the United States enter into a quagmire of insurgency warfare. This asymmetric warfare created interesting challenges for the modern Army. Special Operations and snipers became very effective, and they were armed with suppressed weapons. There was a theme of trying to make weapons quieter and quieter. The Sionics Silent Carbine was the product of the make it quieter attitude.
Sionics and Mitch WerBell
Mitch WerBell III might be one of the most controversial and interesting men to have ever lived. He was an OSS man, an Army Captain, a soldier of fortune, a potential CIA spy, and a weapons developer. The son of a Tasarist calvary man who had some serious hate for communists. He owned a company called Sionics, which produced suppressors for a wide variety of weapons.
(Thomas Collection)
He was also one of the forces behind Gordon Ingram’s MAC-10 and built the MAC’s famed suppressor. During the Vietnam War, he saw an opportunity to sell his cans and weapon systems. In fact, he said something along the lines of “If the military buys a suppressor, I want it to be a Sionics suppressor.”
As President of a 75-man company, he went to Vietnam to show off his wares. I doubt we’d ever see the President of Raytheon go to Iraq to sell wares. He developed suppressors for the M16, the M14, and various other weapons. He also developed silenced weapon systems. One that gained a small order was the Silent Sniper Carbine.
The First Silent Sniper Carbine
When he initially went to Vietnam to sell his Silent Sniper Carbine, he brought modified Spanish-produced ‘Destroyer’ Carbines. The Spanish Destroyer carbines were bolt-action 9mm Largo rifles. They were made for police use and were pretty neat all around. Mitch WerBell and Sionics modified the design to be nearly unrecognizable.
They cut off the wood stock and converted it to a wire stock design with a pistol grip. Sionics chopped the long barrel off the gun and attached a Sionics 9mm suppressor. They mounted a Mossberg-fixed four-power scope to the gun, which had to be side-mounted to work correctly. There were no iron sights.
Thomas Collection
The idea behind the concept seems quite solid. A bolt-action rifle doesn’t have the clack of a semi-auto firearm, and 9mm can be made subsonic quite easily. The Destroyer Carbine already existed and was a 9mm weapon. All you needed to do was convert the weapon to 9mm Parabellum.
The use of a wire stock made it easy to pack up and carry. No soldier in Vietnam wants their primary weapon to be a bolt action pistol caliber carbine. The Sionics Silent Sniper Carbine would be a specialty weapon carried alongside an M16 or similar long arm.
He showed it off to some important higher-ups. Lt. General William Peers, the Commanding officer of I Field Force, tested the weapon alongside Mitch WerBell. According to the Long Range Ware by Peter Senich, he was so impressed that he ordered 10 Silent Sniper Carbines.
Thomas Collection
There was a problem: Mitch couldn’t provide 10. In fact, he seemingly couldn’t provide any. He attempted to withdraw from the contract, but the Army didn’t have it. They wanted their Silent Sniper Carbines.
The New Silent Sniper Carbine
What happened? Well, the imports and availability of Destroyer Carbines dried up. He couldn’t get his hands on the carbines to convert to Silent Sniper Carbines. Personally, I think Mitch might have been more of a soldier than a businessman at times. A smart businessman would have purchased a quantity, even just a small quantity, of Destroyer Carbines before seeking contracts.
Thomas Collection
Regardless, Mitch and Sionics had to come up with something. What they came up with was rather ingenious. They turned to Plainfield Machine Company, a company known for M1 Carbines. They special ordered ten 9mm barreled actions. From there, they designed the second generation of Silent Sniper Carbine.
This was no standard M1 carbine. It wasn’t a semi-auto design. To keep the clack down, it was a manual-activated, straight-pull bolt action design. I can’t find any hard specifications, but the barrel is short and has an integrally suppressed design. The weapon uses a wood chassis and a collapsing wire stock.
Thomas Collection
The wood chassis part had two pistol grips, one up front and one standard rear grip. I’m curious if the front grip was due to heat, but not entirely sure. The gun used modified Hi-Power magazines to give the shooter 13 rounds of ammo. The guns had four power TASCO scopes to top it off. Ten guns were shipped to South Vietnam for the initial contract, but four additional Silent Sniper Carbines were sent to the 9th Infantry Division.
How Did They Work?
Sadly, that’s where the story ends. At least as far as I can tell. I’m not sure how often they were used, how long they were used, how effective they were, etc. It’s certainly a fascinating carbine idea, and these oddball, limited-production guns always tickle me. I’ll keep searching, and if I find anything, stay tuned for the sequel.
Montana Knife Company is quickly becoming one of the premier knife companies in the United States. They make top-quality knives and are led by one of the youngest master bladesmiths in the world. They’ve designed knives and hatchets designed for tackling the great outdoors. MKC designs knives for outdoorsmen, hunters, and the like. This year, they’ve decided to get into the tactical world, and the first knife in their tactical lineup is the WarGoat.
The WarGoat is an expansion of the Goat series of knives. The Goat series seems to be MKC’s flagship lineup. They are fixed-blade, moderately sized blades made for general outdoor use. The blade design would be at home skinning game, cleaning fish, or constructing a shelter. It’s a versatile blade design.
The WarGoat variant is a little less versatile and has a very clear intent with its design.
It’s made to stab people.
The WarGoat Features and Specifications
The Wargoat is seven ⅞ inches long with a 3.5-inch blade and weighs a mere 2.23 ounces. The blade is made from Magncut stainless steel, and the finish is cerakote. As you’d expect, it’s a full-tang knife with G-10 grip scales added. The scales are rough-textured for a sure and easy grip.
The blade uses a drop point design that offers a distinctive tip and a nice long belly for deep slashes and cuts. The Goat had to go on a diet to form the WarGoat. It’s handle is quite thin and small. It’s designed to be an inline dagger design that’s lightweight and easy to carry on tactical gear. The normal Goat has a handle designed for working purposes. The WarGoat’s handle is scrawny comparatively.
A fairly large ring, designed for your index finger, sits at the end of the handle. It allows for a very steady reverse-hand grip for a quick and easy draw in a dynamic situation. The ring adds a different retention level to the knife and helps guide the hand to a perfect grip for defensive use.
If you flip the grip and use a more traditional grip, the knife has a choil that gives great edge control. It’s designed for self-defense, but it can do standard knife things in a pinch. Your MRE will be shaking in fear as the WarGoat dissects it to access those sweet Skittles.
Magnacut and Cerakote
Magnacut is a premium knife steel designed to be a knife steel. It’s one of the rare options that wasn’t adapted from something else. It was designed by knife nerd and metallurgist Larrin Thomas. He designed a bit of a do it all knife steel. It’s not only tough as hell, and features excellent edge retention, but it’s also corrosion-resistant and not that hard to sharpen.
The steel has gained lots of steam recently, and it seems like a great way to break into the tactical knife world for MKC. The WarGoat also features a cerakote finish. According to MKC cerakote was used to protect the blade, reduce reflections, and because it’s tough enough.
The combination of cerakote and Magnacut delivers an awesome combination to a premium-grade knife.
The WarGoat In the Hand
The WarGoat’s grip is thin and comfortable in either a forward or reverse grip. It’s clearly made for a reverse grip. I imagine the thin handle would wear on you if you tried to do more traditional knife things with the WarGoat. The WarGoat’s blade comes ultra sharp and so satisfying to cut with.
You can chew through Amazon boxes at the M240’s cyclic rate. The WarGoat’s Magnacut steel delivers a very nice blade. The handle’s shape is surprisingly comfortable for how thin it is. The grip panels are a nice touch that allows for a nice firm grip even when you aren’t using the ring.
Fighting Knife
The WarGoat falls into that same realm of knife as the Benchmade SOCP. It’s a fixed-blade minimalist knife that seems to be realistically designed for the modern ‘knife’ fight. It’s not a great big blade that Rambo would carry. The Wargoat is small, lightweight, and easily attaches to a belt, pack, or plate carrier.
It’s a last-ditch tool to defend oneself against a physical attack. For a cop or soldier, it mounts to your gear and gives a literal edge when things get hands-on and your gun is inaccessible. Let’s say some dude at a checkpoint rushes you, and you’re fighting to retain your gun. You pull the WarGoat out and start stabbing at any fleshy part you can reach.
The WarGoat allows you to create distance and change minds, which allows you to get to your gun and use it as necessary. In practice, the thin nature of the WarGoat’s handle means you don’t have to sheath it to grab your gun. Sure, it’s not the best grip, but it’s still small enough to allow you to use your gun with the knife still in a reverse grip.
If the fight stays physical, the ring will lock the knife into your hand. It’s a realistic fighting knife that delivers a method of creating distance and changing someone’s mind when they climb on top of you.
Stubborn as A Goat
The WarGoat delivers a compact, lightweight, and very well made fighting knife. The WarGoat is a simple tool that’s perfect for a gear belt or plate carrier. It carries on the well proven Goat lineup, just in a new and fairly exciting format for a company known for knives for hunting, fishing, and field work.
Shivworks ECQC is a pivotal class for a lot of people, and I’m no exception. Among the changes that the course brought about for me was the realization that pepper spray is a very useful component of my EDC.
During the Managing Unknown Contacts portion of the class, the role-player I was working with was doing a very good job of getting in my head, keeping me talking, and being able to encroach.
I very quickly realized that “Man, I wish I had something a little more compelling to get this guy to f*ck off if he won’t just take ‘no’ for an answer!”
As I delved into the topic, I realized there were a bunch of benefits to carrying pepper spray.
Not only can OC go places were guns can’t/shouldn’t, but there are a lot more situations we’re likely to find ourselves in where a degree of force is justifiable, but the threshold for deadly force has not yet been met.
Social media gives me ideas for articles all the time. I don’t go looking, but rather, I get to see things that people are doing that aren’t always advisable. A recent thread on a shotgun group brought up the subject of red dots, and I saw several shotguns wearing full-sized red dots. I don’t want to be a jerk, but a big, full-sized red dot on a shotgun is a silly idea. When I say full-sized red dots, I mean anything larger than an Aimpoint T-2.
Today, we will discuss why you shouldn’t use a great big, full-sized red dot on a shotgun.
What’s the Problem With Full-Sized Red Dots On Shotguns
There isn’t just one problem with full-sized red dots on shotguns. There are three problems that are almost entirely exclusive to shotguns. With that in mind, this article is about standard shotguns. If you have an AR-type shotgun, a bullpup monstrosity, or something just odd, these might not be your problems. If you’re using a Mossberg 500, a Beretta 1301, or something like that, strap in and pay attention.
Port Loads Get Limited
A big red dot gets in your way when it comes to emergency port reloads. A port reload is what happens when everything has gone to hell, and you’ve emptied your shotgun but need to fire another round. With this reload, the ejection port is opened, and the user is shoving an emergency round into the gun.
The shooter closes the action and can now fire the round. Port loads can be done one of two ways: over the top or under the receiver. With pump guns, I go under the gun because it’s more natural to find the pump and get the gun running.
I go over the top with a semi-auto because it’s naturally faster from a side saddle for me. Environmental factors can force you to use one method over another.
When you go over the top, a full-sized red dot gets in the way. It’s just a big block in your way, making it difficult to get the round in the chamber and get the gun firing. You can always go under the gun unless the environment doesn’t allow you to do so.
Your Head Sits High On The Gun
Standard shotguns have standard stocks, and they don’t use an inline stock system like an AR. This means when you use a full-sized red dot with a shotgun, your cheek leaves the stock, and your head floats a bit above the shotgun’s stock.
This causes us to have two problems at once. First, you can’t get a good cheek weld on the gun. If you can’t get a good cheek weld, you can’t get a quick and consistent sight picture. Since shotguns dominate close-quarter’s use, you want as much speed as possible.
The second problem comes down to recoil and pain. If your head is floating and your cheek weld is a chin weld, the gun will start to beat you up. You want your head low and against the stock, not floating and getting a slight jab with every trigger pull.
Height Over Bore And Shotguns
Let’s remember that shotguns really dominate that zero to twenty-five-yard range. That’s extreme close quarters, and at close quarters, you want your shots to hit where you’re aiming. If you use a full-sized red dot that sits a bit high on your gun, you’re going to run into height over bore issues.
This is a real pain with modern loads like Federal FliteControl, which hit more like a slug at close ranges. We want the rounds to hit exactly where we are aiming with shotguns. Trying to come up with a hold for a shotgun just seems silly.
What’s The Best Size For a Shotgun Red Dot?
I stick to pistol-sized red dots. The largest I’d use is an Aimpoint T-2/H-2 in a low, shotgun-specific mount. I find pistol-sized dots to be perfect, and with the right mount you can still co-witness with your iron sights. Short, small, and sitting low is best for a shotgun sight. If you can, avoid full-sized red dots on shotguns. With the gauge renaissance, many optics and mounts are well suited for the modern shotgun.
One thing that “gun people” are big on is Situational Awareness. The irony is that lots of those same people dismiss the importance of understanding the mechanics of style as somehow trivial and vain.
Oddly enough, I found that once I developed a deeper understanding of style, especially how clothing is SUPPOSED to fit, it made the concealment attempts of others blatantly obvious to me!
We’re not just talking about the casual gun carrier whose shirt is too tight or who didn’t realize that it’s ridden up to expose the firearm. I’m talking about professionals who make their living deceiving others:
Professional magicians!
Ok, probably not what you expected, but it’s true. I was in the 5th row at a Penn & Teller show, and I noticed some inconsistencies in their stage suits that made it more obvious as to how they accomplished certain aspects of their illusions.
While this may seem silly, there’s a lot of similarity between professional magicians and professional criminals. They both make their livings lying and deceiving people. The only real differences are that the magician TELLS you they’re going to lie to and deceive you, and they don’t use those abilities in a nonconsensual capacity.
Whenever Situational Awareness & Printing are discussed, the examples used are so extreme as to be almost comical.
Developing an understanding of how clothing is supposed to look and function allows you to key in to much more subtle tells. Why not put in a little extra effort to get something that equates to partial x-ray vision?
We live in an era where it’s seemingly tough to produce anything new, modern, or cutting-edge. It feels like we’ve reached the pinnacle of gun design until we find some new lightweight, tough material, something new ballistically, or something that implements technology into a handgun design. We are always chasing incremental improvements. The use of rotating barrels is one of those supposed incremental improvements.
The improvement is supposed to be a recoil reduction. The question is, is it true? Can a rotating barrel reduce recoil when compared to your typical Browning short recoil system? Pistols with rotating bolts haven’t been especially common, which calls into question why they aren’t popular. If they’re so great, why hasn’t everyone adopted the rotating barrel? Can a company be so audacious as to make false claims?
Especially companies like Beretta? I don’t think so, but I couldn’t say how much recoil rotating barrels cut down. To find out, I found myself a Grand Power P1. Admittedly, I purchased it for more reasons than that, but I was curious about this whole rotating barrel thing.
The World of Rotating Barrels
Browning famously designed the short recoil system, which sits at the heart of most semi-auto handguns. He also designed a rotating barrel system. Browning never produced a pistol with a rotating bolt, but he received a patent for one in 1897. The famed and very sturdy Steyr 1912 used a rotating bolt. The French MAD PA-15 also used the design.
One of the most famous modern examples is the Beretta PX4 storm series. Beretta also uses the same system in the Beretta Cougar. The latest seems to be the S&W 5.7 pistol. Tucked in between those guns sits the Grand Power, a Slovakian pistol series that comes in numerous calibers and uses a rotating barrel.
This isn’t a new invention. It seems to come around every now and then and promptly gets forgotten. It’s not a common feature, but it’s not uncommon either. The rotating barrel design has never seemed to have caught on.
Rotating Barrel Vs. Short Recoil
Short recoil is the most common system of operation for semi-auto handguns. It’s been that way since 1911, or at least since the M1911 patents expired. Short recoil works and works well. The idea behind short recoil is simple. When a weapon is fired, the barrel and slide recoil together for a very short distance before the barrel stops, and the slide continues rearward and completes the cycle of operations.
Short recoil guns do reduce recoil, at least compared to a direct blowback gun. The barrel and slide moving together allows for a light slide, which allows light recoil. The rearward motion also absorbs some of the initial recoil. The barrel recoils rearward, and the rear of the chamber cams downward while the tip of the barrel tips upward.
The rotating barrel system used in most guns is also a short recoil system. The barrel rotates and moves rearward with the slide. It doesn’t cam downward or tilt upward. The barrel stays on the same linear plane and rotates. Most modern guns will have locking lugs that unlock as the barrel rotates. The barrel rotates in the opposite direction of the projectile.
Finding the Truth
To figure out if the rotating barrel reduces recoil, I grabbed the compact 9mm P1 and shot it side by side with the compact 9mm Glock 19. I took the Bill Drill as an influence but didn’t start from the holster. I just fired six rounds as fast as possible into an ISPC sized A-Zone. Timers and accuracy don’t lie, and the P1 presented a tighter group fired fractionally faster.
From a side-by-side perspective, the difference is noticeable, especially when firing a long string of fire. The difference in recoil reduction is fractional. It’s not even equivalent to a compensator on a handgun. I don’t think a lot of casual shooters would even notice the difference between the two.
In fact, it’s probably going to provide high-level shooters with the most real benefit. I’m certainly not at that level, but I do feel that the P1 has less recoil than the Glock 19. There can be other factors that also affect this. We can talk about bore height, grip design, and recoil springs. I’d say when you compare the price points and designs of the handguns, they tend to be fairly equal.
The rotational barrel design takes a bite out of recoil, even if it’s not the biggest bite.
Downsides To Rotating Barrels
There are downsides to these guns and the rotating barrels, one being price and complication. It’s not as easy to produce as a short recoil system. The gun also demands a wider slide for those recoil lugs. The slides on the Beretta and Grand Power aren’t dainty. It can also complicate suppressor use since your suppressor/Nielsen device relies on threads that are pitched in a specific direction.
I do think there could be a good reason to use a rotating barrel design for the incremental difference it makes. However, it takes more than a neat design to make a pistol successful. Maybe if Glock brings the 46 to the states, we’ll see a revival in such a system.
One of Leupold’s most classic reticles across its tactical riflescope lines has always been the Tactical Milling Reticle (TMR). It was originally implemented approximately two decades ago as an improvement over more archaic “mil-dot” reticles. These earlier “mil-dot” style reticles used round spheres or oval-shaped footballs that subtended in one mil increments. However, the TMR did away with those since the round or oval markings tended to be less precise and, due to their size and shape, obscured targets.
Instead, the TMR did away with those orbs and introduced a series of flat, straight hashes arranged in more precise patterns across both the horizontal and vertical stadia lines. These hash marks decluttered the middle of the sight picture and ultimately made it easier for any shooter to take advantage of the reticle’s milliradian-based system. By today’s standards, the TMR looks quite ordinary, but at the time of its design, it was one of the most cutting-edge reticles.
At first I wasn’t enthused by it, but the more I shoot with this reticle, the more I appreciate it. My appreciation for the TMR most definitely increased after realizing it was the reticle that succeeded the old-school mil-dots. As such, I stopped taking it for granted because even today, the TMR still possesses some strong points.
It’s also interesting to note that this reticle is a veteran of the GWOT and was prominently used in many of Leupold’s Mark 4 military scope models, especially those mounted on original 5.56mm NATO Mk. 12 SPR and 7.62mm NATO M110 SASS semi-automatic rifles. Such rifles were paired with TMR-based Leupold Mark 4 LR/T 2.5-8×36 and Mark 4 LR/T 3.5-10×40 models.
An American warfighter shooting a Mk. 12 MOD 1 SPR rifle off his pack with a Leupold Mark 4 LR/T scope. Image source: Leupold
The Leupold Tactical Milling Reticle At A Glance
The Tactical Milling Reticle is the spiritual successor to the Leupold mil-dot reticles that saw military use in the United States through the mid-2010s. This reticle retains many of the former’s functionality but executes it in a cleaner, streamlined, and more precise manner.
Obstructing mil-dots along stadia lines are replaced with flat hash marks that don’t clog the sight picture visually. Otherwise, the reticle still maintains a fairly standard square crosshair configuration consisting of two main stadia lines, one vertical and the other horizontal. Both stadia lines have three different levels of thickness that taper in segments from coarse, medium and fine.
When a TMR-equipped scope is fully magnified, the overview of the reticle looks like it resembles a duplex with its coarse to thinner line transitions. The most useful hash marks begin subtending in 0.5 mil increments through the finest portion of either stadia line.
The central aiming reticle is voided negative space so as not to obstruct targets at longer distances. The medium and coarser spans of stadia lines are divided into sections of 2.5 mils, 5 mils, and 10 mils to aid with ranging and general-purpose measurements. These can be especially useful when paired with a first focal plane riflescope.
Diagram sourced from Leupold. This graphic does an excellent job at breaking down all of the TMR’s subtensions and shows its dimensions. The golden/yellow portion in the center of the image is what a shooter with a first focal plane optic would see at full magnification. On the 2-10×30 Mk5 HD scope I shoot with, the 17.5 mil mark on the coarsest stadia lines can be seen.
The TMR According to Leupold
Leupold’s TMR uses a mil dot style framework that incorporates a milliradian based subtension scale for ranging known targets. In addition, the intersection of the crosshair is left open, creating a small, clear aperture for increased precision at longer ranges. Recent findings have determined that existing reticle designs obscure the target at longer distances. The TMR reticle eliminates that problem.
–Leupold HANDbook
Ranging Targets With The TMR
In addition to aiding with precise shots, a big function in the TMR’s design is to give rifle shooters the ability to use the milliradian-based (MRAD) calibrated markings to determine the distance in yards or meters of any target of a known size. It’s called ranging, and it’s an old-school analog method of determining the distance of shots. It is straightforward and involves a tiny bit of math.
The math is very easy. It’s merely calculator math that anyone can do. Nowadays, sophisticated shooters have access to all manner of laser rangefinders and other gear. So, maybe using the reticle itself to “mill” targets comes off more like a party trick than a practical measuring technique. But it’s still useful to remember.
Ranging is done by lining up an object in between the reticle’s hash marks and counting how many hash marks it takes up. Then, multiply the object’s height in yards/meters by 1000. That product is then divided by the number of “mils tall” the object measured in the reticle and the quotient is the distance. Then, one would dial or hold over accordingly.
For example, a sniper on overwatch is concealed in some rocky hills, looking down at a landing strip and hangars below, where drug dealers are expected to show up for an exchange. The sniper doesn’t know the distance from his position to this landing strip, but there happens to be a 53-foot semi-truck trailer on the tarmac.
Our sniper knows that a standard truck trailer is 13.5 feet tall, which is 4.5 yards. He brackets the height of the trailer using his TMR and determines it is 3.5 mils tall. He can multiply (4.5 yards x 1000) ÷ 3.5 mils and get the distance to the tarmac, which is 1,286 yards from his position.
Ranging Full-Size IPSC Targets
Here’s a more mundane example that doesn’t sound like an episode of the Terminal List. A shooter is shooting at full-size IPSC targets (76.2 cm tall) on an unknown distance rifle course. After bracketing one of these targets and determining it’s 1.5 mils tall, she uses the same formula (0.762 meters x 1000) ÷ 1.5 mils and determines this target sits 508 meters away.
According to her rifle’s ballistic chart, to hit that target, she’d either need to dial 3.67 mils into the elevation turret or count the vertical hashes on the TMR to hold over 3.67 mils.
The downside of ranging targets in this manner is that the formula only works with an accurate guess of the target or object’s height. Without that measurement or something close to it, the number for the distance would be extremely unreliable. More importantly, without having any ballistics data for a rifle and its load, the ranging information from milling with the TMR isn’t as useful.
When Walther created the PP series of pistols, they didn’t do anything superbly revolutionary. They just combined a number of well-known and appreciated features into one platform. The PP, PPK, and later PPK/S are quite famous and widely cloned. Typically, the clones are seen as inferior. For example, guns like the Makarov are seen as cruder examples of the same technology. However, some are arguably superior, and the Astra Constable falls into the superior part of the clone game.
The Astra Constable – A Spanish Walther
Astra’s Constable uses the same basic layout as a Walther PP/PPK. It’s a direct blowback-operated firearm with a fixed barrel that doubles as the gun’s guide rod. The gun has a DA/SA trigger system and manual safety, doubling as a decocker. The Constable came in .380 ACP, .32 ACP, and .22LR. My example is a .380 ACP.
You might even mistake the Constable for a Walther with its sleek appearance and design. It’s upon closer inspection that you begin to see the difference. The barrel length is 3.5 inches, which is shorter than the Walther PP and longer than the PPK. In .380 ACP, the gun holds seven rounds.
One of the big departures the Constable makes from the Walther is the addition of a manual slide release. This helps you quickly reload and modernizes a design that traces its origins to 1929.
Unlike the German-made Walther, Spanish-made Constables can be very affordable firearms. If you want a Walther for its design and function, the Astra Constable can be a very affordable alternative. Constable pistols can be found for less than $300, and that’s a helluva bargain.
Upon Closer Inspection
Spanish-made firearms don’t get the credit they deserve. Their arms industry has cooled these days, but they have produced some very robust and innovative pistols in the past. Companies like Astra and Star produced and imported a variety of well-made handguns up until the 1990s. Eventually, the two companies merged and became ASTAR, but they didn’t seem to do a whole lot as ASTAR.
The Astra Constable keeps the reputation of Spanish pistols. It’s very well made. Everything about the gun comes off as well-made. The finish is evenly applied and looks fantastic. The controls are well-placed and easy to use. Everything clicks and pops as you’d expect. The gun’s slide moves smoothly and locks back solidly.
The magazines don’t just drop out of the bottom—they eject, and they get thrown out the bottom of the gun with some real force. Things like the trigger come off very nicely. The double action rolls rearward nicely and smoothly, and the single action trigger is light with a very short reset. The Constable is not just a cheap clone of the Walther pistol but a weapon made to be a very high-quality firearm.
The Astra Constable At the Range
The Astra Constable’s biggest downside is the blowback-operated system. Straight blowback guns have excessive recoil, and in little, all metal guns, it results in some snappy recoil. That’s apparent here with the Constable. The little gun doesn’t recoil as harshly as a Walther PPK, but it still slaps you in the web of the hand, and we get a good dose of slide bite if we ride the gun too high.
Modern shooting techniques involve a nice high grip on the gun, but you’ll have to resist the urge. It’s tough, I know, but unless you want to lose a chunk of skin by the end of a magazine, you’ll figure it out. While recoil and slide bite can be harsh, the gun is flat shooting. It doesn’t have a ton of muzzle rise, so if you can take the recoil, you can put your rounds in a fast, tight group.
The Constable is a fairly accurate gun. The sights are small, but if you take the time to find them, you can put those pesky little .380 rounds wherever you want them. The guns’ small sights aren’t great for speed, but at the classic seven to ten-yard self-defense range, you’ll be well-armed and capable of putting rounds in the vital spot of a threat.
At longer ranges, the gun suffers from the small sights. So, it’s not a 25-yard pistol by any means. You can hit a man-sized target, but where it’s going is up to fate! Not really, but it’s not going to impress you. However, you might shoot a bit better than me and can make it work.
A Bargain Bin Gun
The Astra Constable offers you a lot of gun for not much money. Sadly, they aren’t that common. People who have them likely don’t see a reason to sell them since they won’t get a whole lot for one. If you can find one, it’s one of the best budget options for concealed carry. It’s well made, accurate enough, super reliable, and small enough to carry without a problem.
A few evenings ago, I attended one of PHLster’s Enigma Tune-Up Webinars. It was hosted by PHLster employees Dakota Adelphia and Tessah Booth—who also designed this course. Their level of knowledge and aptitude towards helping others was quite impressive, even for someone like myself who has “been around the block” in the gun-space, so to speak.
Before going over my experience during the webinar, I’d like to share some background and context about the PHLster Enigma concealment system. It has been on the market for nearly four years now and has been validated and approved by the community at large.
The PHLster Enigma System
When I first started writing, the PHLster Enigma system was one of the very few gun-related accessories, if not the first one I ever reviewed. The gist of this concealment system is that it allows virtually anyone, man or woman, regardless of body type, to conceal most types of defensive carry pistols or revolvers on their person independently of wearing pants and a traditional gun belt.
The system works by tethering AIWB-style holsters to a bracket and a low-profile minimalistic belt that cinches down directly to the body. Because the system does not rely on the external belt, belt loops, pants or any of the other traditional garments needed to successfully support a concealed handgun, wearers are free to carry their gun independently from their wardrobe choices.
This allows both men and women to dress and conceal in ways that weren’t as feasible in the past due to the limitations of clothing needed to support handguns.
For example, a man wearing professional business attire wearing an Enigma system can keep a concealed pistol in his waistband while also tucking in his shirt. This is something that would be impossible with a standard IWB (inside the waistband) or AIWB (appendix inside the waistband).
In the past, a man wanting to conceal in business attire would have been constrained to wearing a sports coat or some other cover garment. That isn’t always practical or necessary—especially in warmer climes.
Likewise, with the PHLster Enigma Concealment system, a woman can wear a dress, tunic, skirt, or any other free-flowing form-fitting garment that doesn’t involve belt loops and a belt. Historically, it has been especially challenging for women to maintain some semblance of fashion while trying to successfully carry on their persons.
The Enigma Learning Curve
I loathe to use the term “catch” here, but there is somewhat of a catch to successfully concealing with the Enigma system. Since the system is designed to provide a unique concealment solution for literally “every” “body,” the catch is that successful execution does require a little effort and some level of understanding behind the principles of concealment to properly use.
There’s a bit of a learning curve, but rest assured, this is far from a true drawback. Successfully understanding the Enigma isn’t so complex that it requires an advanced engineering degree to understand. Furthermore, as a company, PHLster goes above and beyond to educate the public on the basics of concealment.
The company has spent a good amount of time and treasure on tutorials, guides, and how-to videos while also actively curating an educational page on Facebook. Best of all, all of this information is freely available to anyone.
A slide from the lecture portion of the PHLster Enigma Tune-Up Webinar
The Live Tune-Up Webinars
Going one step beyond their educational resources and support group on social media, PHLster escalates its educational efforts with the Enigma Tune-Up webinar. Tune-Ups are hosted bi-monthly by Dakota and Tessah and hosted through Zoom.
Attendees can view Tune-Ups either as audience members (with access to a live chat for any questions) or live participants. With a few caveats, live participants need to register ahead of time and wait for the green light to sit in on the Zoom session directly. They also have the opportunity to receive in-depth attention in real-time from both Tessah and Dakota regarding concealment tweaks or tips.
For live participants, the Tune-Up turns into both a lecture and a real-time consultation, free of charge. The added benefit is that other live-participants and the rest of the members of the audience are free to follow along and glean relevant information from each spotlight.
The start of the webinar begins with a presentation and lecture on some key basics for the Enigma system to help. At the end of the day, PHLster invests the time and effort it does into its educational and informational material because one of its core missions is to make the knowledge of proper concealment as widely understood as the topic of gun safety itself.
The Takeaway
Personally, I don’t use the Enigma system too often due to my typical dress and routine. However, whenever it’s time to don a button-down collared shirt and slacks, my Enigma Express with a Glock 48 is indispensable.
I’m quite comfortable with my Enigma Express, along with carrying concealed handguns in general. However, I wouldn’t consider myself an expert-level user either, and I was able to pick up some bits of knowledge during this webinar. Aside from the few pages of notes I took, Tessah properly showed me the correct application of the system’s “leg-leash” in real-time with a concise explanation about it, for example. I also loved the real-time demo with concealment wedges, because that’s actually something I’m not up to speed on (Enigma or not).
Even though the Enigma system can appear daunting at first, the fundamental issue is that users need to understand how to attune it to their specific body and manner of dress. Ultimately, this is why Dakota and Tessah are there to help.
Red dots on handguns are about as standard as Picatinny rails on handguns. Maybe even more standard these days since even micro-sized guns are now optics-ready. If you release a handgun that isn’t optics-ready, then the entire industry will question you. Since red dots are everywhere and offer you so many benefits, are long-slide handguns relevant anymore? Let’s dig into the benefits of a long-slide handgun and discuss their usefulness in 2024.
The Basic Benefits of a Long Slide Handgun
Long-slide handguns have been popular with shooters looking to improve their overall accuracy. They’ve been immensely popular with competition shooters and somewhat popular with police users. The longer slide offers a long sight radius.
A sight radius won’t make a gun more accurate, but it will make it easier to shoot accurately. Long-slide handguns and their extended sight radius make shooting easier with greater precision and at greater ranges.
Longer slides also tend to make it easier to track the sights. If you can track your sights, you can shoot faster and straighter.
Long-slide handguns contribute to less recoil purely by adding more weight to the gun. Larger guns tend to be easier to control, and long-slide handguns tend to reduce recoil slightly. We also get a little velocity boost. It’s not necessarily a groundbreaking amount of velocity, but it’s worth mentioning.
The Red Dot Revolution
How do red dots fall into this conversation? Red dots do a lot of great things for handguns. One of the biggest benefits of running a red dot is that the sight radius no longer matters. You only have one focal plane with a red dot, so the distance between sights doesn’t even enter the conversation.
Additionally, the red glowing reticle can easily be tracked throughout the entire recoil impulse. You can watch it move as a small blur that follows your recoil pattern. It’s easy to track, and once you get used to it, you’ll only see that blur because you’ll shoot so fast that it stays a blur.
Red dots can’t do anything to reduce recoil or increase velocity, but they do remove the two biggest advantages of long-slide handguns.
The Last Benefit Standing
What about lower recoil? That’s beneficial, but it’s not that big of a deal. A good grip and stance can also reduce recoil significantly. Is the minimal recoil reduction felt by long-slide pistols worth the additional cost? Is it potentially worth a slower draw, less concealability, and a generally front-heavy pistol when red dots remove the two major performance advantages?
What about velocity? For self-defense purposes, we need enough velocity to ensure the projectile penetrates deep enough, allowing a jacketed hollow point to expand. The velocity benefit will be largely caliber-dependent.
We know that with common calibers like 9mm, it works pretty well with barrel lengths between 3 and 4 inches. 10mm tends to be a little better from longer barrels if you want actual 10mm performance. Calibers like 5.7x28mm needs a five-inch barrel to be worth a spit.
For most users, compact 9mm handguns with a red dot sight are pretty solid. Anything larger has the benefit of greater capacity and a little less recoil, but it’s also just big and inconvenient to carry. Long-slide handguns can still be relevant if you’re stuck with iron sights, but if you have red dots at your disposal, they don’t offer a lot of juice for the squeeze.
