Advertisement

STREAMLIGHT LAUNCHES TLR-7 HL-X USB MULTI-FUEL RAIL-MOUNTED LIGHT

EAGLEVILLE, PA, May 21, 2024Streamlight® Inc., a leading provider of high-performance lighting and weapon light/laser sighting devices, introduced the TLR-7® HL-X USB, a 1,000-lumen, multi-fuel, rail-mounted light with a longer-reaching beam that provides up to 22,000 candela, more than double the beam distance of previous TLR-7® models. The new light, designed to maximize visibility and targeting capability in a variety of home defense and tactical applications, gives users the choice of using either a cost-saving SL-B9® USB-C rechargeable battery pack or a 3-volt CR123A lithium battery, depending on availability or user preference.

TLR-7 HL-X

The exceptionally lightweight light, designed to fit full-size and compact handguns with rails, also offers customizable rear paddle switches featuring a low or high position to match users’ shooting styles.

“This latest addition to the TLR-7 line is a high lumen light that is engineered to produce a far-reaching, tighter beam, which helps put more light on a target at a distance,” said Streamlight President and Chief Executive Officer Ray Sharrah. “Whether conducting room clearing, search operations or other maneuvers under low-light conditions, the TLR-7 HL-X USB gives law enforcement professionals, military personnel and other first responders sweeping bright light, while also delivering an intense down-range beam. And with its multi-fuel design, users can select the battery option that best suits the situation at hand.

Features Galore

”The TLR-7 HL-X USB features a white power LED and a custom TIR optic that produces a concentrated beam while also optimizing peripheral illumination. It delivers 1,000 lumens, 22,000 candela, a beam distance of 297 meters, and a run time of 30 minutes (default) or 500 lumens, 11,000 candela, a beam distance of 210 meters, and a run time of 1 hour (programmable) when using a Streamlight SL-B9 battery. The protected lithium-ion 850mAh USB-C rechargeable battery pack is rechargeable up to 500 cycles and charges within 2.5 hours via a USB-C port on the battery or optional bank charger.

With a CR123A battery inserted, the light provides 500 lumens, 11,000 candela, a beam distance of 210 meters, and a run time of 1.5 continuous hours.

Securely fitting to a broad range of weapons (using the provided key kit), the new TLR-7 HL-X USB features a one-handed, snap on and tighten interface that keeps hands away from gun muzzles when attaching or detaching them. The light also includes a “safe-off” feature, locking it so it cannot be turned on accidentally.

Constructed with 6000 Series machined aircraft aluminum with an anodized finish, the TLR-7 HL-X USB weighs 2.88 ounces with the SL-B9 battery pack and 2.80 ounces with a disposable battery. The light measures 2.90 inches in length.

With extensively live-fire tested, impact-resistant construction, the new model features an IPX7-rated design, making it waterproof to 1 meter for 30 minutes.

The new light is packaged with a high switch mounted on the light plus an included low switch and is available in Black or Flat Dark Earth. It ships with one SL-B9 battery pack and a USB-C cable and has an MSRP of $295.00 (Black) and $310.00 (Flat Dark Earth). The light comes with Streamlight’s Limited Lifetime Warranty. Find out more by visiting Streamlight.

About Streamlight

For more than 50 years, Streamlight, Inc., based in Eagleville, PA, has designed, manufactured and marketed high-quality, durable flashlights designed to serve the specialized needs of professionals and consumers alike. Today the company offers a broad array of lights, lanterns, weapon light/laser sighting devices, and scene lighting solutions for professional law enforcement, military, firefighting, industrial, automotive, and outdoor applications. Streamlight is an ISO 9001:2015 certified company. For additional information, please call 800-523-7488, visit streamlight.com or connect with us on facebook.com/streamlight; twitter.com/Streamlight; instagram.com/streamlightinclinkedin.com/company/streamlight-inc./; and youtube.com/streamlighttv.

My Top 5 Carry Revolvers

I’m a new hand at revolvers. Starting early this year, I dived headfirst and quickly discovered that revolvers are a bit like shotguns. They are misunderstood and unappreciated, but they are a blast to learn. I’m far from any kind of master of the dark arts of the wheel gun, but I’m learning. I’m shooting, and I’m spending a lot of money on revolver cartridges. I’m even carrying a revolver these days, and while I’ve settled on one revolver for now, I have a few I’m fans of. I’m not a revolver expert, but that doesn’t stop me from having five favorite carry revolvers. 

My Five Favorite Carry Revolvers 

1. – S&W 432 UC 

My current go-to carry revolver, and top pick is the S&W 432 UC, a new Lipsey exclusive. This revolver checks all the boxes for me. It’s chambered in the 32 H&R Magnum, a round that packs a punch without excessive recoil. It’s a reliable stopper with deep penetration and expansion capabilities. And the best part? It offers six rounds, one more than the standard five. 

The S&W 432 UC features a real rear sight which is great because I suck with the trench and front sight setup of most compact revolvers. On top of the sights, this carry revolver comes with high hand grips, which allow you to choke up high on the gun and control it. Those grips are recessed for speed loaders as well. The gun has super pleasant recoil and is super accurate. This is the only snub nose I can use to hit targets at 25 yards consistently. 

2. – Taurus 856 Defender TORO

My second favorite of my five carry revolvers is the Taurus 856 Defender TORO. Again, this gun doesn’t use the traditional trench rear sight. Well, it does, but it also has the option to mount a red dot. I can use a red dot a lot better than I can use a trench sight. The Taurus 856 Defender TORO makes shooting a revolver super easy. The red dot is a cheat code, as far as I’m concerned. I can make 50-yard shots with the red dot most of the time. 

The 856 Defender TORO isn’t a snub nose but packs a 3-inch barrel. Outside of the three-inch barrel, it’s still a compact frame revolver. It’s a stretched-out snubby. It’s easy to carry in an IWB configuration but won’t drop in your pocket. Taurus did add a full-length ejector rod instead of using a snubby design, and the cylinder holds six rounds of .38 Special. 

3 – Ruger LCR in 9mm 

One of first carry revolvers I purchased was the Ruger LCR in 9mm. This was before I knew a single thing about carry revolvers, but I wanted one. I also didn’t want to spend money on revolver cartridges, so I went with a 9mm revolver. The LCR in 9mm uses the .357 Magnum frame, so it’s a bit heavier, but the weight works well when working with spicy 9mm loads. 

The 9mm cartridge offers the gun a huge advantage because it’s super popular and affordable; plus, various cartridges are available in various weights and projectile types. The moon clips act like speed loaders for quick reloads. The LCR is the Glock for revolvers. It’s boring, but reliable. The double action trigger rules and the gun are popular enough for tons of holster compatibility. The downside for me is the trench sight because I suck with it.

4 – S&W 351 PD 

Snubbies aren’t known for being soft in the recoil department and can be downright exhausting when training hard, especially with Airweight handguns. The S&W 351 PD turns the tables by ditching high recoil calibers and settling on the .22 Magnum. This rimfire revolver has hardly any recoil and weighs only 11.4 ounces. The little .22 Mangum will reach deep enough to matter, and the 351 PD gives you seven rounds on tap. 

The S&W 351 PD is a great pocket gun. The exposed hammer might be a bit of a snag, but it allows you to eke out a little more accuracy with single-action shots. The big high-vis front sight is nice, but you are left without a proper rear sight. This micro-sized J frame is a ton of fun to shoot and never gets tiring. It’s a great series of carry revolvers.

5 – Ruger GP-100 

The Ruger GP-100 isn’t your typical compact frame revolver; most would be famously terrible for concealed carry. They do make a few 3 and 2.5-inch options, and that’s about the only option they offer for CCW. I have the seven-shot Ruger GP-100 Talo exclusive and lvoe it. It’s big, but with the right holster, it’s manageable. The big grips and 36-ounce weight help eat up .357 Magnum recoil. It’s heavy and big, so it lands last on the list. 

However, we get great sights and seven rounds. This was the revolver I more or less learned to shoot on. This thing eats .38 Specials up, and I love shooting due to the light recoil and accuracy. It strokes my ego and makes me think I might be okay at shooting revolvers. As far as carry revolvers go this is my last pick to actually carry, it would be my first pick if I knew I was heading to a gunfight. 

More Than A Carry Revolver 

Carrying a revolver isn’t for everyone. If you’re like me and were raised on an autoloader, it’s an entirely new experience. It takes training and lots of practice. Guess what? You’ll have to experiment with revolvers and holsters to find what works for you. I’m no expert, but these five work for me, so maybe they’ll work for you. 

How the AR-18 Influenced Modern Rifle Design

As far as Armalite is concerned, the AR-18 was a bit of a failure. They were flying high on the AR-15 and the US adoption of the weapon. Okay, well, not really, since they sold the design to Colt to keep the lights on. Armalite wanted another hit, and this time, they wanted the sweet, sweet cash, so they developed the AR-18. They knew Colt would chase them down with lawyers if the design was close to the AR-15. 

This forced them to be creative. Eugene Stoner created the AR-16 in 7.62 NATO, and Armalite took that design and shrunk it to a 5.56 platform. They also knew that if they planned to sell this as a service rifle, they’d need to be capable of mass production. Mass production is tough, so Armalite didn’t plan to mass produce the gun. Instead, they wanted to sell a license to produce the gun to countries that adopted it. 

(Wikipedia)

The AR-18 was designed to provide lower-budget military forces with a modern, easy-to-produce 5.56-caliber assault rifle. The rifle would be cheap to construct and use stampings and welding. It wasn’t as refined as the AR-15 but could provide a modern select-fire 5.56 rifle on the cheap. 

Inside the AR-18 

The AR-18 had to avoid the direct impingement system and went with the proven short-stroke gas piston design. The AR-18 wasn’t the first short-stroke gas piston system. That award goes to the M1 Carbine. While both guns use a short-stroke gas piston system, the AR-18s significantly differed from the M1 Carbine. The M1 Carbine had to utilize a light rifle cartridge, and the AR-18 had to use a much higher-pressure cartridge. 

Additionally, the bolt design, piston placement, and gas trap are all considerably different from the M1 Carbine. The bolt wasn’t all that different from the AR-style bolt with seven locking lugs. Instead of receiver extension and buffer and buffer spring, the gun rides on dual recoil springs inside the receiver. This does allow for folding stocks. 

The cocking handle reincorporates and is directly connected to the bolt. Much like the AR, the weapon was well-sealed from dirt and debris. The rifle broke down into an upper and lower receiver group and could break open like a shotgun for easy field stripping. Overall, it was a seemingly decent rifle. The weapon proved reliable, accurate, and easy to shoot, but it was never a major success. 

Howa of Japan obtained a license to produce the gun, and Sterling Armaments Company of the United Kingdom also produced the gun under license. The Philippines dabbled with the design, but it seemingly went nowhere. Armalite was sold, and the AR-18 would have been another interesting but nearly forgotten rifle in Armalite’s history. 

Yet, the gun lived on, mostly through other guns. 

The Influential Nature of the AR-18 

Forget about the AR-15 and AKM for a moment. I want you to name five other intermediate caliber semi-auto or assault rifles. Just name five. I bet at least three of those take inspiration from the AR-18. In fact, it’s easy for all five to have inspiration from the AR-18. Guns like the Steyr AUG, the G36, the CZ BREN, the SCAR, the HK 433, the FN F2000, and even rifles from China like the QBZ-95. 

Observer the AR-18 bolt (AR180s.com)

That’s only a partial list, by the way. There are way more guns out there that took inspiration from the AR-18 than I’ve listed. Most of these guns take inspiration from the short-stroke gas piston system plugged into the AR-18. Specifically, look at the bolts in any of the rifles listed above. The G36, the AUG, etc, all have bolt and bolt carrier designs that are remarkably similar to the AR-18. The gas piston system is also placed above the barrel of these guns, just like the AR-18. 

Now look at the G36 BCG (HKPROs Forum)

This specific gas system works insanely well with high-pressure intermediate cartridges. It’s reliable, proven, and also affordable to produce without sacrificing anything. Beyond just working the gas piston system works exceptionally well with suppressors and short barrels, these are both modern needs that have infiltrated small arms design in the last decade. 

If you need to make a modern rifle for a Western military force, then the AR-18 is likely your starting point. I’m not saying these rifles don’t have their advantages or are just rip-offs because they aren’t. Just using the AR-18 system doesn’t guarantee success. The SA-80 series used the same short-stroke gas system, and it performed terribly. 

The American AK 

The legend or the Armalite Rifle 18 has always reminded me of the American Ak. It was rugged, reliable, and cheap to produce once you had the machinery to do so. Sadly, it didn’t have the staying power of the AK, but it had a similar influence. Thankfully Brownells produced the BRN-180 series so we can all get a little AR-18 love. 

The Ultimate Defense Wadcutter

S&W Model 640 J-Frame Revolver Ultimate Defense Wadcutter

In 2022, Georgia Arms Ammunition made some waves across the defensive revolver space after the company launched its 148-grain .38 Special Ultimate Defense Wadcutter load that was tailored for classic Smith & Wesson J-Frame revolvers; these guns are built on S&W’s smallest frame*, hold 5 cartridges, and typically have a 1 ⅞ inch barrel. The creators of the Ultimate Defense wadcutter set out to work up this load to accomplish two things. The first was to make a load that corresponds with a 10 yard point of impact (and thus is regulated to that distance using the fixed .38-caliber Smith & Wesson sights found on J-frame revolvers). The second was to ensure its propellant charge pushes the 148-grain slug with a muzzle velocity of 750 feet per second out of the 1 ⅞ inch barrel to ensure the bullet has enough energy behind to adequately penetrate a target for defensive purposes. 

Ultimate Defense Wadcutter & The Model 640: A Perfect Pairing

Travis Pike, my colleague here on GAT Daily already touched on these snub-nosed carry rounds last year. It also happened that a reader and good friend gifted me two 20-count boxes of these defensive wadcutters too. I shot ⅔ of the first box through my Taurus 856 not long after I received them from my friend, so by the time I decided to carry out this informal test, I only had one intact box of rounds available. (This makes me wish I would have had chrono data for that first box). Keeping what Mr. Pike already wrote in, I figured the best thing I could do with them is shoot this box of cartridges at 10 yards with one of my J-frame revolvers while clocking their muzzle velocity with my Labradar chronograph. For this simple evaluation, I used my vintage no-dash Smith & Wesson Model 640. This snub-nosed revolver might as well be the quintessential modern J-frame as it takes after the original Smith & Wesson Centennial (Model 40). Both the Model 40 (and the alloy-framed Model 42) set the tone for how modern Smith & Wesson J-frame revolvers are built–especially because of their “internal” snag-free hammer.

S&W Model 640 J-Frame Revolver Ultimate Defense Wadcutter
Labradar
5 fired casings that were loaded with the GAA UD wadcutters. Notice the Starline brass–good stuff.

Carrying Out The Evaluation

It’s worth mentioning that both the revolver and cartridges were in a range bag sitting in the hot trunk of a car and then spent an additional 30-45 minutes sitting in direct sunlight (bright, sunny, and a high of 85℉ that day). By the time I got to this mini-test everything was plenty warm. While I do know that Georgia Arms Ammunition uses a lead wadcutter from Zero Bullets (as this was disclosed in a podcast talking about the load), I don’t know what propellant they’re loading these with. It’s fair to point out that even pistol propellants can be affected by temperature, whether the ambient is very hot or very cold. I don’t think that the ramifications of pistol cartridge temperature fluctuations are as critical as those in a precision rifle cartridge context. 

From a distance of 10 yards, I posted a 3×5-inch index card vertically. To give me a consistent point of reference for the front sight, I drew a crude circle with my pen. Keep in mind that I was conducting this test in a tactical/sport shooting bay at my gun club, so I shot the Model 640 freestyle and unsupported well into the bay as the targets have to be against the main berm. Once the Labradar was set up, I patiently fired all 20 cartridges downrange. Fortunately for me, the Labradar also captured all 20 fired rounds too.  

Ultimate Defense Wadcutter Point Of Impact 

S&W Model 640 J-Frame Revolver Ultimate Defense Wadcutter

I’ll let the picture above do the talking for the “accuracy” results. I’d like to reiterate that I held a six o’clock sight picture while taking these shots. Furthermore, accounting for both the shooter and this fixed sight revolver, one can see that the shots are indeed grouping consistently and are regulated “to the sights.” In this case the nucleus of this 20-round group is just slightly off to the right of the index card’s center. 

Muzzle Velocity Data

According to my Labradar, here are the data I got from shooting the whole 20-round box of the Georgia Arms Ultimate Defense Wadcutter load:

  • Average MV: 727 FPS
  • Highest MV: 781 FPS
  • Lowest MV: 671
  • Extreme Spread: 110
  • Standard Deviation: 30.5
  • Shots Fired: 20

(Gun Club Elevation: 719 ft, Temperature: 85℉, Barometric Pressure: 29.20 mmHG, Humidity 94%)

S&W Model 640 J-Frame Revolver Ultimate Defense Wadcutter
Labradar

My sample size consists of merely twenty cartridges and my Labradar data shouldn’t be taken beyond face value. If I had access to more of these cartridges I wouldn’t mind having a larger sample size and also shooting them through a different 1 ⅞ inch barrel J-frame I own. Quite frankly, the most important aspect is the fact that these loads do shoot to J-frame sights and are regulated properly for 10 yards. Having defensive cartridges, or even standard revolver cartridges in general match up to a specific revolver’s sights and barrel twist can be an exercise in frustration. It’s my understanding that this was one of Georgia Arms’ primary goals in developing this load. 

**Technically the I-Frame is the smallest double action frame size from S&W, but those haven’t been made in a long time.

Special Thanks To R.C. for these rounds and supporting my writing directly and indirectly.

380 Isn’t the Minimum Caliber

How many of you have research concealed carry, watched a Youtube video, or read an article where you ran into a phrase that basically said, “380 ACP is the minimum caliber for concealed carry.” I’ve heard this for more than a decade at this point and there was a time where I believed it. In my previously uneducated mind I thought that the 380 ACP had just enough ‘stopping power’ to get the job done. Not as much as 9mm and .45 ACP of course! 

I’ve spent a lot of time educating myself on firearms, concealed carry, ballistics and more. The most important thing I’ve learned is that there is massive amounts of things that I don’t know. With this mindset I’ve embraced new ideas, some that were counter to the my prviosu firearms education and one of those things is that .380 ACP is no the minimum caliber for concealed carry. 

What Is A Minimum Caliber? 

That’s a really good question. Like a lot of things in the gun world, the idea of a minimum caliber for self-defense starts to fall apart when faced with any real scrutiny. I can’t tell you what a minimum caliber is, but I can tell you what people mean when they say XZY cartridge is the minimum caliber for self-defense. 

Their intention is to portray a particular round as the smallest acceptable cartirdge that will still stop a threat. Much like my previous beliefs on the subject they are trying to say the cartridge has enough stopping power to stop a bad guy. In fact it has just enough, no extra to spare. If you try to break down the answer even more it starts to quickly fall apart. 

Define stopping power for one. What is the mathematical formula that equals stopping power? Is it foot-pounds of energy? I’ll let you in on a secret: with handgun rounds, the energy doesn’t really matter. It’s not enough energy to create secondary wound effects. Rifle cartridges create more than one wounding mechanism, but handguns are limited to the direct damage done by the piece of metal as it travels through the body. 

If it’s not energy is it bullet size? The .380 ACP uses a 9mm diameter projectile that just moves slower than standard 9mm. That seems like an awfully silly thing to measure effectiveness. Cartridges like the .30 Super Carry and 7.62 Tokarev use a smaller projectile, but it’s moving a helluva lot faster, penetrates deeper, and can expand quite well through heavy clothing. 

The idea of the 380 ACP as the minimum caliber falls apart quickly when you start to ask questions. The idea of any minimum caliber falls apart. 

Why Did .380 ACP Become the Minimum Carry Caliber? 

Isn’t that the million dollar question? I don’t have a solid answer becasue we don’t have any kind of formula to tell us what the smallest caliber you should carry should be. I think it became part of the gun culture zeitgeist becasue of the popularity of guns like the LCP and S&W Bodyguard. These ultra small pistols are popular carry options and fired a fairly large cartridge for their small size. 

People might forget that in the early 2010s, these guns were huge sellers. They kind of owned the market due to how small they were. Sure, people hated shooting them, but they were tiny little guns that were easy to slip into a pocket. 

When it comes to firearms, Americans get really stuck on projectile size. It’s part of that American exceptionalism that got us the .45 ACP, while the rest of the world went with the more sensible 9mm. The idea of a caliber smaller than .380 ACP meant using a poodle shooter like .32! 

It’s as if people believed that the .32 caliber round would just bounce off a bad guy. They’d likely start talking about the Moros in the Philippines and other such nonsense. 

Is There A Minimum Carry Caliber? 

No. We can’t even define the minimum requirements for a carry caliber. It all comes down to your situation and needs to be mixed with a bit of science. We want a cartridge that can penetrate through at least 12-inches of properly calibrated ballistic gel. If it can do that it can make it deep enough to reach the vitals and shut down a threat. The expansion we get form JHPs creates a bigger wound track and provides a nice bonus effect, but we really want that penetration first and foremost. 

.22 Magnum ammunition performance can be interesting.

Hot .22LRs can do that these days with the right ammo. That doesn’t mean that .22LR might work well for you. Maybe you are in a very cold environemnt and hearty jackets are an issue. They won’t stop bullets by any means, but they can sap some of the penetration out of the .22LR. For you the .22LR might not be enough, so maybe you want that .380 or .32, or even 9mm. 

Suppose you’re like me and live in a southern state. That might never be a real concern. You have to plan for your environment and situation. I hate the recoil of a pocket .380, so if I’m stuck with a pocket pistol, I’m choosing the .32 ACP. 

You’ll have to research, experiment, and decide what your minimum caliber is and why. It doesn’t have to be .380 ACP by any means. 

Magpul Product Announcement: ELG Stock/Hand Guard

Magpul recently announced new Enhanced Lever Gun (ELG) furniture for an old-school platform: Marlin lever-action rifles.

The ELG™ M-LOK® Stock-Marlin® 1895/1894/336 – our next-gen lever-action stock – features internal storage, as well as both LOP and comb height adjustment capabilities, and a variety of sling-attachment points.

The ELG™ M-LOK® Hand Guard-1895 is an upgrade that’s simple and easy to install, and brings your Marlin’s hand guard into the 21st century. With M-LOK slots at the 3, 6, and 9 o’clock, a built-in handstop, the ELG Hand Guard modernizes your Marlin’s forend.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________

ELG M-LOK Stock-Marlin 1895/1894/336 Stock:

The ELG M-LOK Stock is designed to provide Marlin lever-action rifle shooters a stock with maximum adaptability that optimizes their iconic firearm. With adjustable length-of-pull (LOP) and comb height for various types of optics, storage of extra ammunition or accessories in a weatherized portion of the stock, and the ability to attach various Magpul M-LOK accessories and slings, Magpul brings new capability to the lever-action rifle.

ELG M-LOK Stock-Marlin 1895/1894/336 Stock Features:

·         Adjustable LOP (1.5ʺ total adjustability in 0.5ʺ increments) and comb height (0.75ʺ total adjustability in 0.25ʺ increments) 

·         On-board ammo storage that is modifiable to other storage needs 

·         M-LOK slots for accessories 

·         Proprietary recoil pad 

·         Sling-swivel on pistol grip allows for easy carry 

ELG M-LOK Stock-Marlin 1895/1894/336 Stock Price/Colors:

MSRP: $139.95; BLK/FDE/ODG; all colors coming soon.

ELG M-LOK Hand Guard-1895:

The ELG M-LOK Hand Guard-1895 is a lever-action hand guard designed to optimize the functionality of the Marlin 1895-pattern series of lever-action rifles. The handguard is 12” long, and attaches to the firearm using a patented mechanism which only requires the user to remove the OEM or other manufactured hand guard and end cap.

ELG M-LOK Hand Guard-1895 Features: 

·         Quick and easy installation 

·         M-LOK slots to mount accessories 

·         Integrated handstop 

·         12ʺ length 

ELG M-LOK Hand Guard-1895 Price/Colors: 

MSRP: $79.95; BLK/FDE/ODG; all colors coming soon.

The BTS 12 – The Ukrainians Adopted What Shotgun?

Ukraine MOD

It’s recently been revealed that The Ukrainian military has adopted a new shotgun. It is not just any average shotgun but a mediocre Turkish mag-fed bullpup shotgun. They picked the Escort BTS-12. I’ll give James Reeves all the credit for breaking the story in my world. Apparently, a few military and defense-oriented websites had reported it prior, but James brought it to the forefront. 

The Ukrainian military has received billions of dollars in aid and weapons but apparently didn’t receive any decent shotguns. The Escort BTS-12 is just one of a glut of bullpup mag-fed shotguns being produced by factories out of Turkey. These guns are exported around the world, and they occupy the shelves of a great many American gun stores under several brand names with slight differences in configurations. 

These are cheap money pits and certainly aren’t suited for a modern war. Admittedly, the Ukrainians weren’t looking for fighting shotguns. The 68th Jaeger brigade adopted these shotguns to deal with FOV drones. That’s an important role, but not a direct close-quarter battle shotgun. 

What’s the Problem With the BTS-12 

The Escort BTS-12 shotgun is a gas-operated bullpup shotgun that’s magazine-fed. The included magazines hold five rounds of ammo, and the gun can chamber up to a 3-inch cartridge. There are a few models of the BTS-12, and it seems like the Ukrainians have an older model with carry handle fixed sights. 

Ukraine MOD

Hatsan states the gun has a self-regulating gas system, which isn’t unique but fairly typical. The gun likely uses a Remington 1100-style gas system, and Hatsan crams it into a plastic bullpup shell. 

That description is about as generic as it gets for bullpup shotguns these days. These Turkish guns are everywhere and follow that exact description. The American gun-buying public must be hungry for them. 

After briefly looking around online, I found they are available for as little as 300 dollars. That’s a fairly typical price for a cheap Turkish shotgun. The folks buying these tend to be low-information gun owners who think they’ve found some futuristic option for a semi-auto shotgun. You won’t see any professional trainer pick one up and declare it the new hotness. 

Ukraine MOD

What’s the problem with these guns? It comes down to long-term reliability. The variant James Reeves reviewed didn’t make it through five hundred rounds without an issue. These guns tend to fall apart and are perfect for the low-information crowd that doesn’t tend to shoot that much anyway. I imagine these durability problems will become hyper-evident on the battlefield, where they’ll be knocked around and beaten up. 

Why The BTS-12? 

If the gun is such a piece of crap, then why would the 68th Jaeger brigade adopt it? There are plenty of quality shotguns for around the same price point that could do the job. I’d hazard to guess that Ukrainian soldiers can’t go to Cabelas and grab Mossberg 500s. They have a limited selection, and Hatsan likely had plenty to sell and sell on the cheap. 

They are an armored brigade, and bullpups work well in and around the tight quarters of armored vehicles. That’s a small benefit to the gun; it’s easily stored in an armored vehicle. A semi-auto action makes it easy to try and follow up with a second shot on a fast-moving mini drone. 

Ukraine MOD

The BTS-12 seen in photos from Ukraine shows a long barrel model. This must be some form of export model that might have a longer barrel to meet minimum length requirements. If I were shooting drones, I’d be using some heavy birdshot, the heavy types of shot designed for geese. These heavier birdshot loads function better with longer barrels and the velocity they offer. 

Sadly, due to the carry handle style sights, the sight radius isn’t extended. The sights on the BTS-12 shotguns are AR-like peep sights, which make it tricky to hit moving air-based targets. For a military force used to using magazine-fed rifles, the magazine-fed shotgun makes a lot of sense. These soldiers are used to using similar platforms, and this cuts down on training. Hopefully, these soldiers will be cycling their shotgun ammo to keep the plastic hulls from deforming under spring pressure. 

Not For Me

The BTS-12 would not be my first, second, or third choice. In fact, it’s pretty far down there. I can see the need and understand that I live in the United States and can pick any shotgun I want. These guys gotta use whatever they can get. I hope they blast a great many drones out of the sky and that their guns remain reliable. However, my hopes aren’t high. 

FN Rush 9Ti

Two years ago, FN released its first commercially available 9mm titanium suppressor, the FN Rush 9Ti. Although the FN Rush 9Ti is compatible with any 9mm pistol whose barrel has ½ by 28 inch threads, this new suppressor is naturally tailor-made for the FN 509 Tactical Series of pistols as well.

For example, not only can the FN 509 Tactical’s taller suppressor height sights clear the outer circumference of the Rush 9Ti, but the body of the suppressor also stays well-balanced while it’s mounted on the pistol. One of the areas where FN’s engineers paid critical attention is the Rush 9Ti’s baffle system which set out to seal gasses very tightly and ensure they are exhausted forward towards the muzzle in order to reduce blowback and interference with the shooter. 

FN Rush 9Ti Suppressor Features

  • Caliber Rating: 9x19mm
  • Overall Length: 7.3 inches
  • Tube Diameter: 1.375 inches
  • Weight: 10.8 ounces excluding piston
  • Included 1/2×28” piston
  • Included end cap/front cap assembly tool
  • Titanium tube, high-heat stainless steel blast and tulip baffles, aircraft-grade aluminum baffle stack
  • Available in Flat Dark Earth or Black HT Cerakote
  • Limited lifetime warranty

From Our Friends At Athlon Outdoors 

An included 1/2×28″ booster assembly proves unique. Dubbed the “smallest, most lightweight on the market,” it helps produce a tight gas piston seal. The corresponding gas flows through the blast chamber and baffle stack, timed to enable rear neutral impact to slide cycle speeds, according to FN. The design goes after reliability in function. It reduces back pressure into the firearm, reducing overall wear and tear, along with felt recoil, according to FN.

“When selecting a suppressor, customers often have to choose between effective sound suppression, reduced blowback or felt recoil; you very rarely get all in one,” said John Ryan, Director of Product Management for FN America, LLC. “Our team developed a suppressor that delivers an unmatched shooting experience straight from the box. You no longer have to settle for one or the other with the Rush 9Ti.” 

The Kit Gun – Weird Gun Genres

Wikipedia

The gun world has lots of weird corners that result in lots of interesting little guns often designed to fit niche uses. Today’s weird genre of firearms is the kit gun. When I heard kit gun I assumed someone meant like a kit car. A gun that’s dressed up to look like a high-performance weapon, but isn’t necessarily a high-performance weapon. You know, like the GSG 5 rimfire MP5 wannabes. 

I was wrong. 

What’s a Kit Gun 

Kit guns, a fascinating part of firearms history, were designed to tackle the challenges of the great outdoors. These were often compact, lightweight guns, with the most common being rimfire guns in .22LR. However, the caliber varied significantly. S&W crafted .38 Special and .44 Special kit guns, and the .32 S&W Long was a popular kit gun cartridge in the past. 

American Rifleman

These guns were designed for hunting small game, killing pests, and even self-defense. Hunters might employ a kit gun to deliver the coup de grace to a wounded animal, and fishermen might carry one to eliminate moccasins and other similar predators. Campers would be well armed with a kit gun for self-defense, pest control, recreational shooting, and small game hunting. 

The name comes from these guns being easily packed as part of one’s fishing, hunting, or camping kit. 

S&W started the idea of the kit gun in 1911 with the I-frame .22lr 22/32 revolver. This was a six-shot, double-action revolver with adjustable sights and a swing-out cylinder. The idea quickly caught on, and there is a lot of overlap with another weird genre of revolvers known as tackle box guns. 

S&W came up with the name and first design, but guns from budget revolver makers like Merwin and Hubert, Iver Johnson, and countless imports were the most common kit guns. Who wants to spend S&W money on a revolver that is going to be used and abused in the woods or in the boat? I can only imagine the dread creeping up on a fisher who drops a S&W over the side of the boat. 

Notable Examples of Kit Guns 

S&W continued to produce various kit guns. The company had the original 22/32, as well as the Model 35, the 34, the 43, and the 317. To this day, the company produces the eight-shot 317 Lite Kit gun, which is a sweet little gun that’s sadly often hard to find. 

Other kit guns include guns like the Iver Johnson 55-SA series that was available in both .32 S&W Long and 22LR. H&R produced revolvers that had a lot in common with my first girlfriend. They were stout but ugly. These were often nine-shot .22LRs that were affordable and tough enough for the abuse. 

The Modern Kit Gun

What does the modern kit gun look like? While the 317 has kit gun in its name, it costs 800 bucks. That’s a tough sale to me. I’d argue there are still plenty of good guns that would qualify as kit guns. They should be compact, light, and affordable. With that in mind, I have a few modern kit gun suggestions. 

Taurus TX22 Compact – Small, light, and affordable all describe the semi-auto TX22 Compact. No one said a kit gun had to be a revolver. The TX22 Compact gives you 13 rounds of 22LR on tap. It’s perfect for hunting, fishing, etc. 

Ruger LCRX .22 LR – The 3-inch model of the LCRX in .22LR is the definition of light and handy. The polymer frame helps reduce the potential for rust and keeps the weight and price low. The adjustable sights are a throwback to the original 22/32, and the gun even holds eight rounds. 

Heritage Barkeep – The Heritage Barkeep is stupidly simple. It’s a single-action only .22LR revolver, but with a cylinder swap, it can shoot .22 Magnum. The Barkeep has a short two-inch barrel but maintains its front sight. For about 150 bucks, it’s a great kit gun that you won’t mind messing up. 

Kitted Up 

Kit guns aren’t quite so popular these days, and I think it’s because most people who carry already have a CCW handgun. Why not just bring your Glock 43X on the boat? It seems simple enough. This weird gun genre likely saw it’s death to the spread of concealed carry. The idea itself is still sound for some, and maybe you can use it as an excuse to buy a new gun? 

Long-Range Rimfire Precision Shooting

Athlon Outdoor Video Series Long Range Precision Shooting

Shooting rimfire rifles and ammunition is a great way to touch the finer points of precision rifle shooting without having to bear the full costs that are oftentimes associated with full-bore centerfire precision rifles, their cartridges, and other accessories. Specialized rimfire precision rifle rigs can cost just as much, if not more, than their centerfire siblings. However, generally speaking, shooters can get excellent results from more affordable models, such as the Tikka T1X that’s featured in this video.

With that said, it’s very important not to skimp on quality match-grade rimfire rounds for best results. Specifically, because they tend to be more consistent than bulk rimfire ammo products (which are better suited for plinking anyway). After all, consistency is the name of the game when it comes to precision rifle marksmanship caliber or cartridge notwithstanding. 

Glassing Up for Long-Range Precision Rimfire Shooting

Similarly, one should still strive to get the best-magnified optic their budget allows. Thinking that a less expensive rifle begets a less expensive scope is useful only to a point. But what good is trying to shoot precisely when you struggle to see your targets clearly? A scope’s ability to gather light and magnify it to the shooter’s pupil doesn’t change because each round costs .20 cents instead of $1.20. 

Because of the realities that pertain to rimfire cartridges, such as less power and less ballistic capabilities, shooting them well at extended distances becomes more challenging as shooters need to account for the slower muzzle velocities and the wind/environment’s effect on the bullet during flight. It can ironically be more of a challenge to shoot rimfires, but they provide a valuable training opportunity when it comes to riflery.

Watch the video below to learn more about shooting rimfire precision rifles.    

To catch other videos from the Athlon Outdoors Long Range Precision Shooting Series, please click here

The PSDR – The Most Silenced Revolver

One of the cool things about the original Star Wars movies was the use of World War I and World War II firearms. The production dressed the guns up, and they created a unique style that entered the realm of iconic. When I first saw the PSDR, that’s the vibe I got. In fact, if it was a part of bar trivia, I’d have called it a Star Wars gun. In reality, the PSDR is a special-purpose revolver design that offers one of the most complicated suppressed weapons I have ever seen. 

The PSDR – One Heckin Suppressed Revolver

PSDR stands for Peters Schalldämpfer-Revolver, which translates to Peters Suppressed Revolver. This German design makes use of an American cartridge and revolver to form a gun worthy of Boba Fett. German firearms company Peters Stahl created the PSDR. Peters Stahl might not be well known to American audiences, but believe it or not they were a prolific European M1911 company. 

Gun laws across Europe are notoriously strict and Peters Stahl produced a M1911 that could be easily converted to various calibers. You can purchase one gun and only deal with European regulations once but easily convert the gun to multiple calibers. Peters Stahl entered the special weapons realm at the request of the Northrhine-Westphalia division of the German Spezialeinsatzkommando. 

Source Unknown

Spezialeinsatzkommando, or SEK, is similar to an American SWAT team. This is a state police force dedicated to special operations. At their behest, the company took an S&W Model 625 and began what must have been a laborious process to convert it into a suppressed platform. The S&W 625 is a large-frame revolver that chambers the .45 ACP cartridge. It’s notable that the most common .45 ACP ammo is a 230-grain cartridge. These are naturally subsonic and excellent suppressed firearm food. 

Making the PSDR 

Suppressing revolvers is possible but requires some specialized design. The problem with just slapping a can on a revolver and calling it a day is the gap between the chamber and the barrel. This allows muzzle blast and noise to spill outward and makes suppressing the vast majority of revolvers impossible. Some revolvers have used a gas seal design that eliminates the escape of gas and blast. Notably, the Nagant revolver can be suppressed easily. 

Source Unknown

Building a revolver from the ground up isn’t easy, but I doubt adapting one is either. The PSDR went with the simplest of options and built a suppressor and barrel design that covered everything from the barrel down to the grip. The suppressor is built over the new barrel, and a blast shield encompasses the entire cylinder. The cylinder is also fitted with obturating rings. 

The blast cylinder had a hinged portion that opened, allowing the cylinder to open and the user to load, reload, or unload the gun. 

Since the big chonky suppressor blocked the sights the company used red dots, and even laser aiming devices. There was also at least one with a mounted variable optic for those apparent long-range .45 ACP shots. 

Source Unknown

Peters Stahl built both a short and long PSDR. The short version features a shorter suppressor and acts like a normal handgun. Carbine versions provide a stock for better aiming. There are at least two carbine variants. One uses a simple wire stock, and the other a much more supportive, more traditional rifle stock. 

How quiet could it be? Impressively so. Reportedly, the volume of a shot fired was around 90 decibels. That’s about the same volume as a PCP air gun. Needless to say, it’s quite quiet. 

Source Unknown

But Why? 

Why they went with such a complicated method is beyond me. They could have slapped a normal suppressor on an M1911 or HK MP5 and had something similar. The only real difference I can think of would be just how quiet the gun could be without an action slamming back and forth.

Using a revolver allowed repeatability as well. Even if that was your need, I could see something like a suppressed custom short lever action rifle as more useful, but maybe that wasn’t available for the SEK. 

You could argue it doesn’t leave casings behind, but I doubt the SEK cared about that. They aren’t doing black ops in German territory on high-risk warrants. I don’t really know why it was designed and built or if it was ever even fielded by the SEK. Still, I respect the ingenuity of the design. 

The Taurus Model 85 – A Sci Fi Favorite

What’s that joke from Phineas and Ferb? Something like if I had a nickel for every time this happened, I’d have two nickels. Which isn’t a lot, but it’s weird that it happened twice. That’s how I feel about the Model 85’s use in Sci-Fi movies as a dressed-up future blaster. The Taurus Model 85 is about as simple as a gun gets. 

IMFDB

It’s a five-shot, compact revolver. The barrel is typically 1.87 to 2 inches long. Some 2.5-inch and 3-inch options were also available, but it’s mainly known for being a snubnose revolver. Taurus produced and imported the gun for 49 years and only recently replaced it with the 856 series. For movie guns, I can see why it made sense. It’s cheap for one and easy to find. Revolvers and blanks get along fantastically. 

That all makes sense. What’s interesting is how the gun became a space-like blaster in two movies and two TV shows. Let’s explore the Model 85 and its time as a movie star. 

The Model 85, AKA The Moses Brothers Self-Defense Engine Frontier Model B

In the short-lived but brilliant series Firefly and the follow-up movie Serenity, our main hero, Captain Mal Reynolds, carries a sci-fi blaster directly inspired by the Volcano pistols of 1854. Of course, the weapon isn’t a lever-action caseless ammo weapon. In real life, it’s a Model 85 dressed up in a brass casing. 

The pistol’s design is unique and features a slick look that can’t be accomplished with a standard semi-auto pistol. While the creator credits the Volcano pistol, it has late 1800s early semi-auto vibes. In the show and film, the pistol is used as a semi-auto handgun that feeds from a magazine in front of the trigger guard. 

Using the Model 85 allowed the gun to fire blanks without issue since the design couldn’t actually function as a semi-auto. If you haven’t watched the film or TV show, it’s a hive of great guns dressed up as Sci-Fi blasters. You can join the rest of us who complain about Fox canceling it way too soon. 

The Model 85 as the 2035 Future Pistol 

2035 isn’t that far away, and I don’t think we’ve reached anything close to what the film I, Robot promised us. I have a Roomba, and it hardly works. We certainly don’t have guns that look as cool as Detective Spooner’s pistol. Spooner’s pistol is the weapon seemingly issued to Chicago PD, as we have seen it more than once in the hands of police officers.

In real life, the Model 85 is the core of this gun. According to the loaded magazines in the film, it’s dressed up to be a 9mm pistol. The gun does feature Walther P99-like grips, then a whole load of custom crap slathered on the weapon to give it that future vibe and to enclose the old-school Model 85 design. 

Unlike the Serenity pistol, the pistol looks neat and doesn’t have an absurdly out-of-this-world design. It’s easy to see why they still used the Model 85. It allowed the pistol to be fairly conservative in design. This same configuration was later seen in a later season of Stargate SG-1. 

Why The Taurus? 

As mentioned, the Taurus Model 85 was cheap and readily available. You could strip one down and encase it in parts easily. If it broke, it wouldn’t cost much to replace it and do it again. Revolvers make a lot of sense when making sci-fi weapons, especially small revolvers like the 85. 

IMFDB

If we started enclosing a standard semi-auto in sci-fi features, we’d have some complications. First, the guns would start to look incredibly bulky. Semi-autos are already considered bulky compared to revolvers. Plus, we’d have to contend with a slide that has to reciprocate and some shell design could impede this function and create issues. 

Revolvers work well with blanks, and the short barrel of the Model 85 makes it easy to create some nice muzzle flash for the film. It makes a lot more sense when you start thinking critically about it. I wonder, what’s the next revolver to become a sci-fi pistol? 

The Sub 9 – A Prequel to the SUB 2000

The KelTec SUB 200 series has reached its third generation of firearms only recently. Suppose you count the integrally suppressed model that makes four distinct weapons. Well, that’s the four most people know of. There is a fifth, and it’s known as the Sub 9. I’m a KelTec Sub 2000 fan. I think it’s just a neat, fun rifle, and I’m fully aware of its flaws and downsides. 

Call it nostalgia. When I was 16, I was given a Gen 1 Sub 2000 as a birthday gift, and I loved that rifle very much. It’s likely why I still love PCCs and digest 1,000 rounds of 9mm a month. Even as a fan of the KelTec Sub 2000 series, I had never heard of the Sub 9. One of my hobbies is reading old gun magazines. I was scrolling through a 1998 issue of Soldier of Fortune and saw an ad for the Sub 9. 

The Sub 9 – The Forgotten KelTec 

Many of Kellgren’s designs from Grendel are forgotten but revived by KelTec. Grendel developed the P30M, a .22 Magnum pistol that held 30 rounds. That sounds a lot like the PMR-30 to me. The Sub 9 seemingly got the same treatment, but the turnaround time was much shorter. 

If you start searching for the Sub 9, it doesn’t generate many results. The Wikipedia pages for the Sub 2000 lack any mention of the Sub 9, and the KelTec Wikipedia page mentions it once. If we assume production started in 1998, it was only another three years until the first gen of the Sub 2000 was produced. 

KelTec doesn’t rush production, and until recently, it was often tough to get your hands on most KelTec weapons. It’s unlikely KelTec produced many of them. Using the Wayback machine, I can go to KelTec’s earliest website incarnation, which was in 1998. They had an AOL email address, which might not resonate with some of our Zoomer readers but seriously dates the website. 

The website only lists two guns, the P-11 and the Sub 9. The information is scarce, and the photos are tiny. I hit fast forward and went to KelTec’s website in 2000 for more information. KelTec still maintains a manual for the gun on its website, which was also helpful. 

All About the Sub 9

To no one’s surprise, the KelTec Sub 9 was a simple blowback-operated pistol caliber carbine available in 9mm and .40 S&W. The rifle folded in half, just like the Sub 2000 series, and could use magazines from Beretta, Glock, and S&W third-generation handguns. The grip assemblies could even be exchanged to swap magazine types. 

(C)scott@scottbwilliams.com

The big difference came down to the gun’s materials. While we all know the Sub 2000 uses polymer wherever it can, the Sub 9 used aircraft-grade aluminum. The majority of the weapon was made from metal and CNC machined. Additionally, the edges are slightly rounder, and the gun looks a bit bulkier. The bolt housing lacked a hold-open slot. KelTec also states the handguard stores batteries and other devices, but it’s unclear how. The gun weighed half a pound more than the first-gen Sub 2000 series. 

The price was the most significant difference the user would note between the two guns. In 1998, the Sub 9 had an MSRP of $700, which, when adjusted for inflation, equals almost $1,400. Imagine spying $1,400 for a blowback-operated 9mm PCC. Who did these people think they were? Christensen Arms? 

(C)scott@scottbwilliams.com

Fast forward to 2001, and the Sub 2000 was in production, and the MSRP was a mere $383. Talk about the power of polymer! The Sub 9’s big problem was that high price point. That’s a tough sell, and even these days, you have to do something fancy to get that kind of money for a pistol-caliber carbine. 

The KelTec Sub 9 was too expensive to succeed, but it paved the way for an affordable, easy-handling PCC that helped jump-start an entire genre of firearms. 

Weapon Retention With Full Spectrum Warriors

Train, train, train. We should all be so lucky to get out there and train in a broad degree of different skills. Recently, Safariland hosted an event in Central Florida that gave a lucky few gunwriters a chance to train with Rich Graham and his crew at Full Spectrum Warriors. We covered a wide variety of topics, including a hearty course in weapon retention from both Safariland and Rich Graham. Safariland focused on the holster aspect of retention, and Mr. Graham and the company focused on the practical steps that shooters can take to keep their weapons. 

Full Spectrum Warrior’s focus on weapon retention was built on three different stages of training. We had to prevent takes from the holster, fighting over the gun that was already out of the holster, and how to employ the weapon as an impact weapon in extreme close-quarters combat. We trained at the Full Spectrum Warrior facility, which was a sprawling training environment hidden down a couple of miles of dirt road. The hidden little deep woods facility has everything from vehicle courses to a shoot house and even an obstacle course. 

The Retention – The Art of Holding On 

As one would expect, the training used Safariland holsters. We used inert training tools in the shape of firearms that were locked into the holsters well. Our first bit of instruction was based on keeping the gun inside the holster. 

Rich explained that the Safariland retention devices were capable of keeping the gun in the holster as long as we kept the bad guy away from the gun. Instead of focusing on putting both hands over the weapon for retention, we focused on physically dissuading a grab through avoidance and simple but efficient strikes, as well as control techniques against an opponent. 

There was a big focus on keeping the holster on the opposite side of the attacker and preventing bear hugs and similar disarmament techniques. We paired up and practiced the basic techniques at increasingly higher speed and force. Not a single inert training firearm was removed from a holster. In fact, my partner and I fought so hard over the gun we ended up breaking the ALS lever on a holster—but the gun never left the holster. 

Our combative techniques were very simple but also effective. They didn’t require hours of training to understand and master, which I think is the perfect technique for most people. It’s simple, with a focus on forcefully dissuading the grab while creating distance to allow firearm use. 

Retention and A Gun In The Hand

The next part of our training started with one shooter having the gun in hand and the other person attempting to grab it. We were not necessarily trained in disarms but were taught how they work purely for the act of resisting the disarm. This portion of the training was broken into two parts. The first technique involved a shooter pointing the weapon and a bad guy grabbing the gun. 

The shooter was then taught how to use leverage to go with the take and reposition their body and arm to provide the most resistance against the grab. Once the proper position was established, we were taught a push or pull technique to free the gun from the grab and engage the threat. 

The second part was pure wrestling for the gun. We took it to the ground, and each student got a hand on the weapon. The shooter started with their hand on the grip, and then the taker grabbed wherever they wished. Then, the two students or an instructor and student went at it. It was a fight and a good one. 

During this entire portion of retention training, Rich commented on and directed the students on how to resist certain grabs, takes, and tactics. You can’t predict or explain every scenario as an instructor, so taking every opportunity to point out strategies and techniques in the randomness of a fight or struggle paid off. 

Pistol-Whipping 

The last part of the retention class focused on using the weapon as a striking tool. We didn’t practice on each other but used padded boards to strike. The focus was on how to use the weapon to strike, which I referred to as professional pistol whipping. 

It was explained that using a gun as an impact weapon is a very niche thing to do but gives you an option if a shot simply isn’t available or if you’re wrestling over the weapon and have the opportunity to. 

The real focus was striking with the weapon, then creating distance so the gun could be fired. It was simple and a good way to end a sweaty, dirty class. 

Full Spectrum Warriors

The material presented was very easy to understand, and Graham and the crew took their time breaking down each portion of each drill and technique. Questions were considered and answered throughout the class. Graham was never afraid to stop and put himself in the middle of the action, either. He’d demonstrate or even be the class dummy for demonstrations. 

The Full Spectrum Warriors facility and staff were top-notch, and I plan to use a variety of techniques and practices to keep training and stay sharp. The company mostly trains law enforcement, but if you can find your way into the occasional open class, I would highly recommend it. 

The Connoisseur’s Pistol: The Glock 34   

Glock 34 9mm Pistol

My relationship with Glock pistols is complicated: I called the Glock 19 unremarkable. (There’s actually nothing wrong with them, and let’s face it, the 5th-gens are pretty damn good). Still, on the face of it, they’re not terribly exciting. But take that same gun, add half an inch to the grip and 1 ½ inches to the slide and barrel, and the end result is arguably one of the coolest Glock pistols of all time: The Glock 34. The experience instantly gets amplified from zero to hero.

In spite of the 34’s downsides, like its blocky Glock 17-style ergonomics and “mid” triggers, Glock 34s shoot like damn laser beams. Because of this, they inspire confidence in the shooter’s hand, too. It’s no different than the feeling you get from holding a tuned 2011 or 1911. Psychology, after all, is an important facet of higher-level shooting. How one feels while shooting critically can and will affect performance.

Technically, I’m not sure if it’s the Glock 34’s sight-radius, longer barrel, or what. But there’s something about them. Like they say in France, “je-ne-sais-quoi.” From a catalog of soulless plastic, this one has soul and is actually cool. 

Gen 3/4 Glock 34 s
Mine and a friend’s Gen 3/4 Glock 34s, from back in the day. Both my carry and training guns are in this picture.

Enough about emotions, dear reader. It’s also my job to look over and write about different handguns. If you follow my work, you’ll notice that I have a typefull-size performance-oriented handguns. I’m truly blessed to shoot and try out many wonderful pistols, and I think the ol’ Glock 34 still holds its own today, too.   

Origins Of The Glock 34 

Originally developed for action-pistol sports, the Glock 34 takes the standard full-size frame found in the Glock 17 and marries it to a 5.5-inch barrel (and longer slide). Other than some of their more unique physical and technical aspects, Glock 34s have an identical layout to Glock 17s (and these days, the rest of the line-up of 9mm pistols with full-size grips like the Glock 47 and 45). The original Glock 34, which belonged to the third-generation style of Glock pistols, first saw the light of day at the tail end of the 1990s. 

Gen 5

Like the rest of the flagship 9mm lineup, the Glock 34 jumped into the “fourth generation.” Years later, in 2017, when the fifth-generation models made their initial debut with the Glock 17 and 19, the 5th-gen Glock 34 followed suit a few months later during SHOT Show 2018.

Not only was it one of the first catalog items to get the 5th-gen treatment besides the 17/19, but the fifth-generation Glock 34 was also one of the earliest optics-ready modern product 9mm pistols on the market. All fifth-gen Glock 34s include a slide with the Austrian company’s MOS cut.

The Glock 34’s additional overall length gives the gun a longer sight radius. In the case of sporting ammunition, the longer barrel allows certain loads to develop enough muzzle velocity to make power-factor as well. Think of the well-loved 147-grain bullet loaded with 3.3 grains of Titegroup, for example.

Not only will it make minor power-factor with the 34’s barrel length, but it has that gentle recoil impulse sport-shooters love. In the tactical and training realms, these guns will handle damn near anything that’s cycled through them. I used to load mine with 147-grain HSTs.

Gen4 Glock 34
One of my old Gen4 34s, this one wore the TTI F/O sight sets, which is still one of the best ones money can buy for 9mm Glocks.

Jumping From Practical To Tactical

Although the Glock 34 was conceived with sport-shooters in mind, it didn’t take long before serious ‘tactically-minded’ shooters got ahold of them and began fielding them. Their full-size shootability and long-sight radius lend themselves well to more than mere IPSC paper targets and steel poppers. Its overall profile also matched that of the full-size government-framed 1911 pistol, which, at the time the Glock 34 was launched, was still the pistol.

Amongst the tactical crowd, the Glock 34 arguably peaked during the 2010s–prior to slide-mounted red dots becoming commonplace and rendering the additional sight radius less important. But during its golden age, these longslide pistols became a status symbol in their own way. In this sense, 34s weren’t much different than the single-stack .45-caliber 1911 before them or the double-stack 9mm 1911 with dots after them.

In fairness, the Glock 34 hasn’t completely disappeared from this realm either, especially the current generation models mounted with reflex sights. It’s not unusual to see them at high-end training events and action-pistol weekend matches alike. They’re still very much viable 9mm pistols in 2024.

Further reinforcing its “serious-professional” undertones, the Glock 34 is cast alongside memorable and enigmatic characters like Denzel Washinston’s John Creasy in Man On Fire. In this 2004 film, his signature sidearm is a third-generation Glock 34. And Creasy’s character isn’t a light one, either. The plot alludes to his background as a highly-trained man with specialized skills.

Similarly, in John Wick 2, the main character, played by Keanu Reeves, also fields a Glock 34, albeit one worked over by Taran Tactical Innovations. And we all know John Wick’s background. 

Creasy contemplating life while staring at his sidearm during one of the more dramatic scenes in Man On Fire. (imagesource)

Outside of the silver screen, we can observe Ben Stoeger working with Glock 34s in present-day in between training periods that don’t include his beloved CZ Shadow 2s or other handguns. The same goes for several other GM/high-level shooters. Gabe White, one of the foremost handgun instructors on the West Coast, also made a name for himself with an older 34 back in the day.     

The Glock 34 In Present Day 

My experiences with Glock 34s date to a few years back, and both of mine used to be fourth-generation models. This is why I’ll cop to being somewhat biased in their favor. I had many early milestones in shooting and training back when I started carrying and using those 4th-gen Glock 34s.

Ironically, when the fifth-generation Glock 45 launched, I ditched those old Glock 34s. Not only was the 45 fully ambidextrous and smoother for me to run, but the shorter slide actually reciprocates faster because it’s smaller and lighter. In spite of those wonderful memories with those older 34s, I had no compunction selling and moving on to a gun I could handle more smoothly. Being left-handed and switching to fifth-generation models is a no-brainer. 

However, the 34 found its way back into my life after coming across two different like-new fifth-generation MOS models. One of them wears a Forward Controls Design Glock MOS to RMR plate and a Trijicon SRO. The other now has XS Sights’ new fiber-optic iron sights and a Glock Performance Trigger. This Glock 34 is going to be the test-bed for my reviews of those two accessories.

Last year, shooting the other 34 (with the SRO) in between testing and evaluating the Canik Rival-S and CZ Shadow 2 made me realize that the Glock 34’s magic is still alive and well. It never left, and in fact, with all of the fifth-generation upgrades, it shoots better than ever before. Even amongst a crowded field full of worthy contenders.