Advertisement

Riot Control Grenades

Riot control grenades take two basic forms, chemical and kinetic. Chemical grenades are designed to emit fumes that irritate or disable to the extent that they prevent persons from carrying out a chosen course of action, i.e. they quell rioters. The primary requirement demanded of such agents is that they irritate or disable, but also that they do no permanent damage. For many years, the chosen irritant agent in riot control  was tear gas, a relatively harmless substance that des little more than bring tears to the eyes and impart a general feeling of choking and helplessness. Tear gas  is now generally known as CN, but its proper chemical name is alpha chloroacetophenone.

Easily dispersed

The most significant failing of tear gas soon discovered once it had entered service as a riot.control agent was found to be that in the open area its vapour cloud generally dispersed so readily and so quickly that the tear gas  mist easily lost its disabling properties. Tear gas was also relatively easy to tolerate, especially after some experience of the substance and many fit young people could, therefore, carry on their disorderly activities after exposure to CN with only a minimum of inconvenience. Inside a building it was often another matter entirely as the wall, roof and floor of the building helped to contain the tear gas mist at a concentration that was still incapacitating, but in the open tear gas east soon seen to be relatively inefficient in its primary task as an anti-riot weapon. During the early 1950s, therefore, a new and more effective and persistent agent was demanded as a successor to tear gas. This led to the suggestion that e new chemical, rejoicing in the chemical name of orthocklorobenzalmalononltrile, be employed as an alternative to tearing gas with superior disabling capabilities.

Riot control units with special weapons

It was not long before this new substance was given the handier appellation CS. CS is normally a solid substance, but on contact with air forms a white or light grey vapour cloud with a general odour od pepper, and, for this reason, CS is sometimes known as pepper gas. He vapour can induce the usual tears, but with the addition of a general choking  sensation and a difficulty in breathing. The effect is distinctly unpleasant and experience has revealed that high concentrations of CS  can cause nausea and vomiting. To add to its effects, CS can be persistent, especially if vapour droplets adhere to clothing. CS is not totally disabling, however, and there are no long-term physical effects. CS was first used during the late 1950s and was soon found to be a remarkably efficient method of breaking up mobs. At first, the prime method of delivering the agent was the hand grenade, in exactly the same fashion that had been used previously for tear gas and smoke. While these grenades were easy to manufacture and use, they suffered from the same drawbacks as the earlier grenades: it took time for the vapour cloud to build up, range was limited by the strength of the thrower (who thereby came well into missile range of the offending crowd), and the grenades could readily be picked up by an adventurous rioter and thrown back. A redesign of the basic CS grenade has therefore taken place.

New grenade design

Modern CS grenades nearly all contain small multiple containers or pellets to emit the CS fumes. As it lands, the grenade body scatters these small containers or pellets (the British L11A1 grenade releases 23 pellets, for example) over a wide area, and the emission period is usually short so that any container or pellet thrown back by a rioter has little or no effect. The other design point is that it is now very rare for CS grenades to be thrown, for they are generally projected using a small propellant charge from a launcher to a range of 100 m (110 yards) or more the launcher usually being some type  of riot gun. When riot guns are used, the usual diameter of the grenade is 37-mm (1.456-in) but this is now generally regarded as being too small and the British army has opted for a grenade diameter of 66-mm (2.6-in) and uses a specialised launcher, the Grenade Discharger L1A1, rather than a riot gun to fire the grenade. CS is not the only modern form of the irritant agent, but it is certainly the type that is most widely used. Other irritant agents include mild hallucinogenic agents that impart a temporary feeling of panic or fear, but the use of such agent is disapproved by many on humanitarian grounds, and such weapons may thus be of the double-edged type, generating adverse publicity of more significance than any real advantage gained on basic riot-control terms. Moreover, some of these ‘mind’ agents have a nasty habit of being just as effective on their users as on their intended targets, even when a respirator is being used. Most police and para-military respirators are limited in their effectiveness, providing protection only against CS and CN, and some powerful modern agents could overcome the protective properties of such  equipment.

Kinetic grenades

Humanitarian considerations also come to the fore when kinetic grenades are considered. These are usually the baton rounds or the infamous ‘rubber bullets’ that are used to disable by stunning. Kinetic projectiles of this type were first mooted during the 1950s, when it started to become clear to authorities in several countries that the last-ditch but yet effective control of riots demanded not conventional firearms, whose use would lead to severe wounds and deaths, and therefore to a mass of adverse publicity, but rather something that was more powerful than the standard irritant agents in use at that time. At first disabling missiles of several types were considered,  these ranging from lead shot in thick bags to heavy rubber rings. Such munitions were usually fired from ordinary riot guns, but  it was  not long before the baton round is its present form appeared. At first wooden projectiles were used, but these were soon discarded as they were prone to splintering and causing the type of nasty wounds that drew adverse publicity. Then for some time rubber was used before it was discovered that under certain circumstances rubber was also likely to cause injuries that were too severe. The current baton rounds are flat-ended PVC slugs that are not as heavy as rubber but are nonetheless likely to impart a powerful blow on the recipient.

Occasional lethality

It cannot be denied that baton rounds can and indeed to cause serius injuries if used at very close ranges, and have also caused a nnumber of deaths. They are also very inaccurate and often have to be used as area weapons rather than as point target weapons. But around of this type can prove effective in breaking up hostile crowds, and when used with extreme care they can even disable ringleaders of a riot or other troublesome individuals. They can certainly keep crowds out of hand-thrown missile range. Espite this, the use of baton rounds has often resulted in a great public outery against their employment. But in the absence of anything better the baton round is an established anti-riot munition.

Source Article from http://www.special-ops.org/15694/riot-control-grenades.html

MeWe Founder Comments on Apple vs FBI


Mark Weinstein may not be a name you recognize but he is likely a name that has affected your life in the last 60 days. Mark is the CEO and founder of MeWe.

MeWe is not in the business of politics or censorship of law-abiding citizens, and has a clear Terms of Service that defines “acceptable use” and it is quite rigorous. And yes, absolutely the law-breakers, haters, and violence inciters, are to be dislodged, disinvited and banned, and that is what they do at MeWe. But not the law-abiders – that is the rub here. MeWe is for good, law-abiding Americans and world citizens. Censorship of law-abiding citizens is profoundly un-American, regardless whether one agrees or disagrees with an individual or group’s hobbies and legal activities.

Censorship is a slippery slope – as history and now most recently Facebook has demonstrated. What are tomorrow’s conversations that Mark Zuckerberg politicizes on Facebook and then censors those who oppose his views? Facebook has harassed and censored law-abiding people and groups who are concerned about GMOs in food, pro medical marijuana, against vaccines, sportsman and hunters, etc. They are censoring members based on Zuckerberg’s latest new opinion. That’s offensive to the very principles of our Constitution and freedom of speech in America.

You can see Mark understands the need for pricvacy and the expectation of the 4th amendment in our digital world via the below article printed on the Huffington Post: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mark-weinstein/fbi-vs-apple-defining-our_b_9260606.html

The landmark battleground lines have been drawn in the fight between the government and the private sector regarding encryption technology. The FBI wants to get into the technology business. Wait, strike that. They want to get into our business by cracking the code and being handed the key to unlock the heretofore-impenetrable privacy technology that protects our business, all of it. As Americans we cannot let this come to pass. It violates the essence of our democracy — our right to privacy.
But let’s step back for a moment. The recent, senseless terrorist tragedies in San Bernardino, Paris and so many places, are mind benders. In their investigation of the San Bernardino attack, the FBI, understandably, wants to look under ever rock to prevent anything similar from occurring in the future. Hence, the court order demanding that Apple create a technology to crack the code on their encryption technology to assist the FBI’s investigation; which includes iPhones with protected data the FBI cannot currently access.
Encryption protects us. That’s not just me ranting either. Back in July of 2015, some of the world’s top security technologists said the same thing, concluding that governments shouldn’t have special access to encrypted communications. Doing so would put the world in a whole lot of danger and give governments the kind of information that can be used nefariously to threaten, cleanse, control, prejudice, and violate their citizenry.
The Information Technology Industry Council (ITI), recognized as the global voice of the tech sector, agreed, declaring the following: “Encryption is a security tool we rely on everyday to stop criminals from draining our bank accounts, to shield our cars and airplanes from being taken over by malicious hacks, and to otherwise preserve our security and safety.”
That sounds pretty good to me. So does our Constitution’s Fourth Amendment. And for that matter you can throw in the United Nations Declaration of Rights, which states: “No citizen should be subjected to arbitrary interference of their privacy, family, home or correspondence.” Sure, okay, but that’s just the United Nations, right? Who cares?
We all must care. Make no mistake about it. This is a battle for our nation’s very soul. Victory is not an option but rather the only course, which is why it requires a general to lead us. This individual must be a voice of reason, savvy in technology, a scholar of constitutional law, and a defender of humanity. He must be willing to stand up for Americans and people the world over. Does such a person exist? The answer is a resounding “yes.” That man is Apple CEO Tim Cook.
Cook has taken what could have been a behind-the-scenes conversation and government demand about surveillance and placed it onto a national forum. Specifically, the FBI wants Apple to change its iPhone operating system, not to make it a better experience for users, but rather to make it an easier experience for the government to hack straight through a rogue back door to get your information. As Cook aptly explains, while the FBI portends that this is a one-time hack — the reality would be unimaginably and likely catastrophically far greater.
In an open letter to Apple’s customers, Cook outlines the situation in no uncertain terms. Smartphones are an essential part of our lives where people store a lot of personal information. Apple’s job is to protect that information from criminals. To date it has done that very well. If you remove that ownership and management from Apple and give it to the FBI, you take away Apple’s ability to control the situation. You breach the trust between Cook’s company and the consumer. You basically call into question the credibility of all business.
Do you really want to trust the government to be responsible as the gatekeeper and key master to your information? Did we learn nothing from Snowden and the NSA’s travails? As Cook points out, if you open Pandora’s Box here, you give anyone the potential to unlock any phone. That’s not a back door as the government projects it. It’s a multi-lane interstate freeway, a technology Autobahn for bad people to access your life. There simply isn’t any way to guarantee control, responsible handling, or accountability.
As Cook writes, information is only as secure as the protections around it. The government contends it would only use such an invasive tool once on one phone. “Trust me,” says the ghost of Richard Nixon. No thank you. If you create a master key, then all doors become vulnerable, not just the one you use it on. Every privacy policy listed anywhere simply becomes an exaggeration of the truth if not an outright lie. You’re not just giving the good guys access; you’re giving everyone a back door. It is absurd to think that the keys to the proverbial kingdom of information would somehow remain sacrosanct. Heck, the Pentagon is not even immune to hacks by the Chinese and Russians.
Our government would have you believe that such access is the difference between life and death for countless American lives. Yet the FBI admitted last year that the Patriot Act’s invasive snooping powers didn’t crack a single major terrorism plot. In 2014 I attended a conference where James Dempsey, Board Member, PCLOB (The Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board), stated that “after 14 years of analyzing the nation’s phone call data collected because of section 215 of the Patriot Act (telephone metadata program), not even one terrorist or plot was discovered that wasn’t already known.”
So it’s not even a debate about the greater good as it is about the no good that comes from the FBI’s good intentions. As Cook says, “We can find no precedent for an American company being forced to expose its customers to a greater risk of attack. For years, cryptologists and national security experts have been warning against weakening encryption. Doing so would hurt only the well-meaning and law-abiding citizens who rely on companies like Apple to protect their data. Criminals and bad actors will still encrypt, using tools that are readily available to them.”
Remember during the McCarthy Era when we hunted down American citizens with rumors and hidden agendas? There was no precedent for such behavior. It went against the core of being American. Cook correctly points out that there is no precedent here either in using American business to expose customers to a greater risk of attack. We aren’t and can never be a totalitarian state.
If we give in here, where does it all end? It doesn’t. As Cook writes: “The government could extend this breach of privacy and demand that Apple build surveillance software to intercept your messages, access your health records or financial data, track your location, or even access your phone’s microphone or camera without your knowledge.”
America is a beacon to the world in freedoms of thought, action, and speech. We may not always agree with the results or see eye to eye with the ideas, but we defend the laws of our land and our rights as people.
Peggy Noonan has referred to our privacy as being connected to personhood. It’s how we think and feel about the world around us. So what happens when we know the government can see and read those thoughts? They no longer belong to us. We just become projections of what we think others reading it want to hear. Cook wants to protect our privacy not as an Apple advocate, but as an honorable American and wise human being. That’s why people such as Edward Snowden, and perhaps the king of data, Google CEO Sundar Pichai, are coming to his defense. Cook is to be commended for leading this war for all of us, a war we must help him win.
Steve Jobs handpicked Tim Cook to lead Apple, and by doing so, he may have left his most important mark on human civilization for years to come. Not because of the product rollout Cook has presided over, though that in itself is quite impressive. Rather, Tim Cook is heroic for his courage, integrity, and his standing for what defines our nation. Tim Cook is a great American. We must all rise, put our petty political differences aside, and take a stand with him for the good of our nation and the future of humanity.
Follow Mark Weinstein on Twitter:

Kimber K6s – Media Day at the Range

The guys took a few minutes to Check out Kimber’s new K6s .357 revolver. It re-evolved.

Source Article from http://welikeshooting.com/featured/kimber-media-day-at-the-range/

See All Nite Sight

Here’s an interesting non-traditional, lightweight, optic for pistols, rifles, and shotguns.

Source Article from http://welikeshooting.com/featured/see-all-nite-sight-2/

Was This The Best SHOT Show Ever?

38th SHOT Show Sees The Industry Reaching Its Stride

Each year the Shooting, Hunting, Outdoor Trades Show is a good barometer to judge what the coming year is going to be like in the shooting sports industry.

Over a period of four days in January, 60,000 industry professionals gather in Las Vegas, Nevada, for the SHOT Show, owned and sponsored by the National Shooting Sports Foundation. It is the largest trade show of its kind in the world.

SHOT Show attracts buyers from all 50 states and more than 100 countries. It includes more than 1,600 exhibiting companies. So much for the stats — let’s just say it’s big.

This year’s SHOT Show was different from other recent ones. It wasn’t simply that political and other things nationally and around the world have triggered heightened buying habits by the public at large. That would merely make it a “good” show.

I’ll declare it to have been a “great” show, because there was a feeling permeating the air that cried out “success.” But that success goes way beyond just business.

The industry finally is catching up with itself. The confluence of the AR and tactical revolution and the Obamanomics of the industry as a result of political attacks nationally and the mishandling of the terrorist evolution globally resulted in buying frenzies over the past number of years unlike anything the industry ever experienced before.

Concurrently, the high-tech manufacturing capacities coupled with modular designs took a few years to solidify, but once in place began to deliver — not only the base products like guns, but also everything peripherally connected to them.

As much as these factors contributed to something akin to controlled chaos for a while, this is the year when all of the disparate parts and pieces are coming together in the form of an industry that is bigger and stronger than ever – and getting more so by the day.

Ammunition, or its supply, has been an issue for some time in the industry. So, it is not surprising to see companies that traditionally were not in the ammo business put their brands on ammo. To wit, there now is Browning ammo, Ruger ammo and Swift ammo (only made component bullets before). And, of course, Sig Sauer entered the ammo business a year ago or so.

Think of it this way: the operative metaphor for 2016 is the .22 long rifle. That cartridge symbolizes both the state of the industry and the essence of the SHOT Show. It was the first cartridge to experience shortages when the frenzied buying began some years ago, and likely will be the last one to see anything that approaches normal supply whenever things do get back to normal.

Mark DeYoung, head of the huge Vista Outdoor family of brands, which include Federal ammo and CCI (we’re talking the world’s largest makers of .22 rimfire ammo), explained that, going into this year, he figured the supply situation would improve significantly by the last months of the year.

But when the Obama administration and some of the presidential candidates came out with their attacks on guns in recent weeks (coupled with the concurrent rise in terrorist activities), DeYoung noted that such a catch-up likely will be postponed. He explained that they’re expanding their production capacity, but the combination of a larger base market and enhanced buying appetite of consumers simply are outstripping their ability to keep up with demand. And this phenomenon can be seen elsewhere throughout the industry.

NSSF president and CEO Steve Sanetti in his “State of the Industry” address echoed these realities during the SHOT Show.

“The road ahead will be arduous and costly,” Sanetti predicted. “But the people are never fooled for long. They, and we, will prevail.

“In that sense, our future has never been brighter,” he added. “Public opinion surveys show an unmistakable and dramatic shift towards us, and away from the prophets of doom.”

“And you have seen those eager new faces in your stores and on the ranges – more newcomers, more women, more diverse participants in the recreational shooting sports, and more of the next generations carrying on that great, time honored tradition of personal safety and responsibility that is the hallmark of our firearms industry, of which you should be so proud that you are all a part,” he said.

So how big is the shooting sports industry? In December the NSSF adjusted total of more than 2.2 million background checks represented an increase of 37.6 percent over the same month a year ago. For all of 2015, background checks were up 8.8 percent over 2014.

The $6.6 billion industry is seeing more people going target shooting and purchasing firearms for personal and home protection. The multi-year trend of more women purchasing firearms for protection and recreational shooting shows no sign of easing up.

Yet violent crime continues to decline.

“Despite the political challenges being mounted against our industry, it is gratifying to see the American people supportive of firearms ownership and to see new and diverse customers taking their first shots and enjoying our sports,” said Sanetti.

What all of this seems to mean is that the market itself is growing in both size and strength. Bluntly put, this well may become known as the Year of the Gun.

I’ve been to almost all of the 38 SHOT Shows, and can report that this one was something special – something more than just business. Literally, there now is a cultural component that ties the shooting sports industry to the citizenry in ways that have not been seen in decades — if ever.

Never before have there been more good reasons for folks to own and shoot guns. The public understands it. And the industry is delivering the goods. Yes, this year’s SHOT Show truly was one of the best ever. It was a brief few days in which social realities jelled with those who supply the items needed for recreation and defense.

The national culture and the gun culture finally have become one. And that is good.

Source: http://www.shootingsportsretailer.com/2016/01/25/was-this-the-best-shot-show-ever/

The Sig Sauer P320 Really Is The ‘Lego’ Handgun

If you’re one of those hard-to-satisfy folks whose mood, likes and dislikes change on a dime, you just might fall in love with the Sig Sauer P320. Like Texas weather, the striker-fired P320 can morph in a moment’s notice from full-size, carry, compact and subcompact to suit any need. Modular functionality even allows shooters to choose small, medium or large grips by simply changing the modular backstrap.

Sig X-Change Kit

While size and grip adjustments might be a home run for most companies, Sig Sauer dove deeper to deliver the type of customizable performance that leaves other gun manufacturers scratching their heads. The result? A tool-less 3-point takedown system designed to separate the serialized stainless steel frame and polymer lower from the steel slide and barrel. This adjustability allows the use of an optional Caliber X-Change Kit that makes converting your P320 between 9mm, .357 Sig and .40 S&W quick and easy.

Sig P320-2

The Sig Sauer P320’s rail even accommodates Sig Sauer red dot optics, such as the Romeo 1, along with fixed sights to allow precise co-witnessing between the two sight systems.  The P320 delivers big on eye-catching innovation, exceptional quality, and the reliability you expect from Sig Sauer.

Source: http://www.shootingsportsretailer.com/2016/01/21/now-sig-has-lots-of-caliber-options-for-the-p320/

Shot Show 2016 – Falkor Defense

At Shot Show 2016: Falkor defense has a FREAKING HUGE Petra, a 300 Win Mag AR platform with a Proof Research barrel (these guys are everywhere). They have ambidextrous everything and shoots 1/4 MOA.

Source Article from http://welikeshooting.com/featured/shot-show-2016-falkor-defense/

Leupold DeltaPoint Professional

Leupold has a really nifty micro red dot sight for all the new semi-auto’s coming out this year that are optics ready. It’s got motion sensing and everything.

Source Article from http://welikeshooting.com/featured/leupold-deltapoint-professional/

FireFunder Is The Kickstarter For Gun Lovers

As much as I love it, our industry needs an occasional kick in the pants to move into modern times. Adoption of new technology is not just “cool”, it’s necessary for us to thrive over the long haul.

In the “let’s make a real difference to the growth of the industry” category is a new firearms industry venture – FireFunder.com. It’s a crowdsourcing enabler that allows all of us to kick in relatively small amounts of money to invest in new products and technologies.

Started by a ticked off inventor who couldn’t get funding through Kickstarter to build his new idea for a multi-diode shotgun laser, the company aims to help both inventors with new ideas fund production of their products and established companies bring even more products to market if they are limited by capital constraints. Any business has to shelve good product ideas because there’s never enough money to go around.

The model is basically the same as Kickstarter. With the help of FireFunder.com, companies set up online campaigns where they promote their idea and production plans. The crowd (that’s you and me) decides whether to pre-buy the product at a discount, thereby providing the company with capital to start production.

What’s in it for gun stores? Well, two things actually. First, lots of good ideas original in the retail gun community. After all, who’s in a better position to identify new market opportunities than those interfacing with consumers every day. In this scenario, FireFunder.com can help turn those ideas into products. Second, retailers can get first dibs on new products at a discount by acting as the “crowd” and investing in new products.

FireFunder.com expects to go love around the end of March, but you can visit their site now to sign up for information and updates.

Source: http://www.shootingsportsretailer.com/2016/01/21/firefunder-kickstarter-gun-lovers/

Russia is developing a mind-controlled Exoskeletons

Alexander Kulish is head of the department at the United Instrument Corporation and he informed public about the exoskeletons manufactured by its company. He said that development of a power source for the exoskeleton remained a major problem.

“We are working on that… Right now our exoskeleton consists of a number of drives and a control mechanism, but it needs a power source, which means that we need a battery powerful enough to keep the robotic suit running for hours on end,” he said.

Alexander Kulish stated that existing prototypes are primarily used for cargo hauling purposes. They are too bulky and slow to be used in combat. There are several means of operating robotic suits, including via a muscle interface. Teaching them to understand brain commands is a real challenge, though, he added.

“We believe that a neuro-interface connecting the human brain with an exo-suit is the most efficient means of controlling it. The problem is that we need to teach the computer to understand brain-transmitted commands and this is exactly what we are now working on,” Alexander Kulish said in conclusion.

The idea behind exoskeleton is to support the wearer by boosting their strength and endurance with improving their overall skills which should be ideal for the future soldiers. They are commonly designed for military use, to help soldiers carry heavy loads both in and out of combat and they could bring revolution.

Opposite of military use, similar exoskeletons could be used in civilian areas to help firefighters and other rescue workers survive dangerous environments and carry on their mission lot easier. Imagine the firefighter with extraordinary strength, or some other rescue worker in the various life threatening situations where they could use exoskeleton and act more efficient than usually.

Source Article from http://www.special-ops.org/15820/russia-is-developing-a-mind-controlled-exoskeletons.html

Ruger

Ruger has really hit a home run this year, with the Ruger American Pistol (or RAP), they’re also quieting down the beats with their new .22lr suppressor.

Source Article from http://welikeshooting.com/featured/ruger/

AB Arms Part Deux

AB Arms has a fantastic Mod X Gen III chassis system and it was so good that we recorded them talking about it TWICE!

Source Article from http://welikeshooting.com/featured/ab-arms-part-deux/

American Spirit Arms

ASA has some awesome looking side charging uppers/bolts, a lightweight .308, as well as a pretty slick 9mm carbine that uses Glock magazines. I’m seeing a trend here with the 9mm carbines…

Source Article from http://welikeshooting.com/featured/american-spirit-arms/

TLP 134 SHOT Show Or Bust

With SHOT Show just days away Lefthand is scrambling to get packed and out the door. Chad Enos with Kel-Tec Weapons drops in to lend a hand and get Lefty on track.  We get caught up with Chad and his latest 3-gun endeavours and find out how he really injured his leg.  The guys discuss some of their expectations for SHOT this year, their plans for the show and what surprises Kel-Tec will drop on us at SHOT.  Chad clears the air about the “situation” with Hank Strange.

Lefty Chad Enos Kel Tec

Lefty Rob Boss Kel Tec

Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TalkingLead/~3/HH_QLzk8OxQ/

Girls with guns