Advertisement

It’s a Monday…

from voidspace.org and Jim Davis

Gun Control proponents have made gains.

-Florida passed the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School Public Safety Act.

The age to purchase firearms in Florida is now 21. Military service members and LEO’s can purchase if they are under 21 for rifles and shotguns.

A three day minimum waiting period is now applicable for all firearms. Exceptions for concealed carry license holders, and Military/LEO who are buying long guns, and licensed hunters buying long guns.

Bump stocks are no more. Possession and transfer are now prohibited in all forms.

For the violation and delay of the second amendment rights of all and especially those 18-20 we have gained…

A provision called the “Guardian” program where certain school faculty members can take 132 hours of specialized training (3+ weeks full time) and then be armed on school grounds. While this provides a more formalized methodology it must still be administered by the local jurisdictional law enforcement, who in all reality could have implemented similar programs already if they have chosen to do so.

While I believe there was a lot of positive language in the bill it should have stood alone away from the firearms prohibitions. From a legal standpoint gun owners lost much and gained nothing that could not have been easily accomplished in other ways.

The security farce of gun control has been appeased and now we see how far down the slope we slip because…

-Illinois HB 1465 passed the house solidly and was referred to the senate.

HB 1465 Provides that on or after the effective date of the bill, it is unlawful for any person within the State to knowingly deliver or sell, or cause to be delivered or sold, an assault weapon, assault weapon attachment, .50 caliber rifle, or .50 caliber cartridge to, any person under 21 years of age. Makes it unlawful for any person under 21 years of age to knowingly possess an assault weapon, assault weapon attachment, .50 caliber rifle, or .50 caliber cartridge 90 days after the effective date of the bill. Provides exemptions and penalties. Provides that it is unlawful for any person within the State to knowingly deliver or sell, or cause to be delivered or sold, a large capacity ammunition feeding device to a person under 21 years of age. Provides that it is unlawful for any person under 21 years of age to possess a large capacity ammunition feeding device within the State. Provides exemptions and penalties. Effective immediately. (Emphasis mine)

If the State Senate passes it the solidly blue state of Illinois will go further into the gun control hole.

-The Department of Justice submitted to the Office of Management and Budget a notice of a proposed regulation to clarify that the definition of “machinegun” in the National Firearms Act and Gun Control Act includes bump stock type devices, and that federal law accordingly prohibits the possession, sale, or manufacture of such devices.

While I personally hold bump stock’s somewhere between bemused acceptance and mild contempt as being a gimmick for amusing ammo consumption. Holding no other purpose, I do not wish to see them banned as the precedent set is ‘we can ignore mechanical realities if we feel like it and it makes us feel good’.

In the video above Gunner Wade of 2MARDIV demonstrates how effective (or ineffective) automatic fire actually is when the express purpose is to cause casualties. Gunner Wade is an expert in his field and is regularly part of the future systems process for the Marine Corps.

What does this mean?

A bump stock and the other methods for rapidly firing a rifle with mechanical advantage are sloppy workarounds to actual machineguns. While the fire rate does increase the effectiveness of the shots diminishes to nothing, actually hindering accuracy substantially. The additional mechanical slop induced by bump fire devices magnifies the diminished effectiveness of automatic fire in standard machineguns.

It is possible to easily bump fire a rifle without mechanical aid. It is still ineffective beyond extreme close quarters.

Las Vegas was a circumstance where the target of the attack was thousands of closely packed people. Casualties were easy to induce because the target was hard to miss and the noise at the target venue covered immediate notice of the attack among the other general confusion. Any rifle including a single shot would have been effective on such a target and the massacre would have been equivalently horrific. Use of a vehicle as a weapon or HME (Homemade Explosive) would have dramatically increased casualties as well.

In short it is impossible to factually argue a bump stock or similar device increases anything but the rate at which the firearm expends ammunition. It cannot be factually argued without a very staged set of circumstances that it would produce higher casualties or that it’s regulation will reduce casualties in similar circumstances.

The regulation will not and cannot give the desired result of casualty prevention and reduction.

This will result in proposition of additional regulations when the current ones fail to prevent casualties, despite every expert’s warnings to exactly that result. This is the slippery slope of gun control regulations.

Hang on folks we are not done.

“That Holster”

From Team Hollis

 

Any woman shooter can relate… The awful challenge of finding “that” holster. I’ve used a few different kinds, and can honestly say I still haven’t found the right one for me.

Each person is different and we all have our likes and dislikes, but like everything that has to do with a female, it is usually a bit more complicated. Finding the right holster is no exception. I will be the first to say we don’t wear sturdy pants with waistbands, or tactical pants to work or around the house every single day. We wear skirts, dresses, yoga pants,etc. How in the world will a holster work with those ? Simply put, it won’t.  And if it does sit in your waistband.. Is it still safe?

I’ve seen all sorts of different wraps and such, advertised and all the different places as to where you can stow away your piece, while still wearing the things we want to wear. I have not been a fan of those items, due to the time it may take me to draw my weapon in the event of an emergency. I am not the most graceful person, and having my HKVP9 wrapped to my body, or stowed away in a bra isn’t much of an appealing idea.

I have used a concealed waistband holster, which I prefer from everything I have used thus far. It clips over my belt & waistband, no fuss with loops or other clips. An advantage of being an easy & fast draw, however a major disadvantage IF, your belt/ pants are on loose OR your holster secures your weapon tighter than most. You will struggle to produce a quick draw while at the same time trying not to give yourself a wedgie! Also, you always have to ensure that your holster is in fact, clipped below your belt or when you attempt to draw, you will pull your holster and weapon completely away from your waistband.

I have also tried the holster that sits on the outside of your waistband and that is secured through two plastic loops on either side. From a female standpoint, it is not ideal,  due to the fact that you obviously need to wear something with a belt & a sturdy waistband. It makes trying to match that much harder ! However, the draw is safer, as your weapon sits more securely and it won’t delay with or “stick” with the holster when attempting to draw.

Whichever you use, however you use it, be sure that when “that time” comes around that you need to use your weapon, ensure you can access it with ease, produce a quick draw and be on the trigger with ample time to also engage your enemy! Be safe & good luck to any other females still looking for “that holster”.

-Team Hollis (Candace)

Light a Single Candle

In tumultuous times – like the ones we as gun owners go through every time there is a mass shooting or terrorist event – it is tempting to throw up one’s hands and give up even trying to fight against the tide of ignorance.

At first we battle and argue. But as time wears on and events pile one on top of another, cynicism sets in. We brood. We stop even trying to argue, reasoning that no one is even listening. We grow tired of repeating ourselves over and over (and over … and over). Sometimes we even turn off news and social media altogether.

I too am guilty of this angry defensive response. It’s difficult to absorb attack after attack upon one’s way of life and very character WITHOUT becoming defensive. I get it. Been there. The T-shirt is in the wash. It seems like an uphill battle. But I’m asking you to try not to give in to the cynicism. Don’t give up. There ARE minds which have been changed. It CAN be done.

Just last week a friend told me of a co-worker who changed her mind about ARs because of the calmly presented logical information my friend provided. I’m so proud of her for that. My friend did not berate her co-worker and she didn’t shut her out. Instead she ENGAGED her. Her response was much better than mine would have been.

As I thought about my friend’s achievement, I was reminded of an old proverb which went something like,

“It is better to light a single candle than to sit and curse the darkness.”

My friend lit a candle.

I admit that I’m as good at sarcasm and snark as the next person. Sometimes I can wield it quite skillfully. It’s a talent that I don’t get to use much at the office though. Pediatricians are supposed to be nice people who gently guide parents, not snark at them, right? Thus, I save the sarcasm for under my breath back at my own desk. I think online and outside the office though, I need to learn to use the snark more carefully. Sarcasm is a good outlet for my own frustration, but nobody learns anything from it (except that they should avoid me when expressing their opinions). Maybe I need to try harder to teach instead of screech.

I find that talking to anti-gunners can be a bit like talking to anti-vax parents in my office. Some simply cannot be reasoned with. They’ve “done their [Google] research”, and concluded that I am “in the pocket of the vaccine industry.” (I don’t know why they trust me with well visits and sick care if they don’t trust my judgement about vaccines, but that is a topic for another day) These people will not listen to a word of genuine research or reason. Their minds are already made up. With these people I struggle to maintain my composure.

But there are other people who are simply worried about what they perceive “the risks” to be and who can sometimes be persuaded with factual information and the right attitude.

I think the anti-gunners work the same way. Some are just not even worth wasting one’s breath. But there are others who only know what they hear on the news (which is frequently incorrect and slanted). These folks are otherwise reasonable people who have been persuaded by bad information – by fear, ignorance, and lies. Those are the kinds of people who we can work with and maybe even have a conversation.

That’s not to say that we shouldn’t continue to insist on proper terminology and correct it where it is wrong. There are some out there who maintain that being pedantic isn’t helpful to a conversation. But the reality is that terminology becomes EVERYTHING when it comes to lawmaking, so that’s where the education part comes in, and why it is so important.

Strive to educate, not berate. If we each did that, there would be literally millions more enlightened people on our side. Every single new person we win to the side of logic and reason is another person who can in turn influence their own circle.

So I invite you to pick someone – a friend, a co-worker, your cousin, your mother-in-law, or even a stranger on the internet – and try to engage them. Ask them why they feel as they do. Offer to explain what they don’t understand. Offer to take them to the range. See if you can light just one candle. Our firearms future may depend upon it.

It’s a Monday…

Gun Control proponents have made gains.

-Florida passed the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School Public Safety Act.

The age to purchase firearms in Florida is now 21. Military service members and LEO’s can purchase if they are under 21 for rifles and shotguns.

A three day minimum waiting period is now applicable for all firearms. Exceptions for concealed carry license holders, and Military/LEO who are buying long guns, and licensed hunters buying long guns.

Bump stocks are no more. Possession and transfer are now prohibited in all forms.

For the violation and delay of the second amendment rights of all and especially those 18-20 we have gained…

A provision called the “Guardian” program where certain school faculty members can take 132 hours of specialized training (3+ weeks full time) and then be armed on school grounds. While this provides a more formalized methodology it must still be administered by the local jurisdictional law enforcement, who in all reality could have implemented similar programs already if they have chosen to do so.

While I believe there was a lot of positive language in the bill it should have stood alone away from the firearms prohibitions. From a legal standpoint gun owners lost much and gained nothing that could not have been easily accomplished in other ways.

The security farce of gun control has been appeased and now we see how far down the slope we slip because…

-Illinois HB 1465 passed the house solidly and was referred to the senate.

HB 1465 Provides that on or after the effective date of the bill, it is unlawful for any person within the State to knowingly deliver or sell, or cause to be delivered or sold, an assault weapon, assault weapon attachment, .50 caliber rifle, or .50 caliber cartridge to, any person under 21 years of age. Makes it unlawful for any person under 21 years of age to knowingly possess an assault weapon, assault weapon attachment, .50 caliber rifle, or .50 caliber cartridge 90 days after the effective date of the bill. Provides exemptions and penalties. Provides that it is unlawful for any person within the State to knowingly deliver or sell, or cause to be delivered or sold, a large capacity ammunition feeding device to a person under 21 years of age. Provides that it is unlawful for any person under 21 years of age to possess a large capacity ammunition feeding device within the State. Provides exemptions and penalties. Effective immediately. (Emphasis mine)

If the State Senate passes it the solidly blue state of Illinois will go further into the gun control hole.

-The Department of Justice submitted to the Office of Management and Budget a notice of a proposed regulation to clarify that the definition of “machinegun” in the National Firearms Act and Gun Control Act includes bump stock type devices, and that federal law accordingly prohibits the possession, sale, or manufacture of such devices.

While I personally hold bump stock’s somewhere between bemused acceptance and mild contempt as being a gimmick for amusing ammo consumption. Holding no other purpose, I do not wish to see them banned as the precedent set is ‘we can ignore mechanical realities if we feel like it and it makes us feel good’.

In the video above Gunner Wade of 2MARDIV demonstrates how effective (or ineffective) automatic fire actually is when the express purpose is to cause casualties. Gunner Wade is an expert in his field and is regularly part of the future systems process for the Marine Corps.

What does this mean?

A bump stock and the other methods for rapidly firing a rifle with mechanical advantage are sloppy workarounds to actual machineguns. While the fire rate does increase the effectiveness of the shots diminishes to nothing, actually hindering accuracy substantially. The additional mechanical slop induced by bump fire devices magnifies the diminished effectiveness of automatic fire in standard machineguns.

It is possible to easily bump fire a rifle without mechanical aid. It is still ineffective beyond extreme close quarters.

Las Vegas was a circumstance where the target of the attack was thousands of closely packed people. Casualties were easy to induce because the target was hard to miss and the noise at the target venue covered immediate notice of the attack among the other general confusion. Any rifle including a single shot would have been effective on such a target and the massacre would have been equivalently horrific. Use of a vehicle as a weapon or HME (Homemade Explosive) would have dramatically increased casualties as well.

In short it is impossible to factually argue a bump stock or similar device increases anything but the rate at which the firearm expends ammunition. It cannot be factually argued without a very staged set of circumstances that it would produce higher casualties or that it’s regulation will reduce casualties in similar circumstances.

The regulation will not and cannot give the desired result of casualty prevention and reduction.

This will result in proposition of additional regulations when the current ones fail to prevent casualties, despite every expert’s warnings to exactly that result. This is the slippery slope of gun control regulations.

Hang on folks we are not done.

We Like Shooting 236 – Himalayas

Gun Control and Carry in Schools, Florida Legislature Passes The Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School Public Safety Act

Florida’s legislature is sending gun control to the desk of the governor. But it’s a mixed bag. Depending upon which news outlet you use to read the news of the bill’s contents you could see “Gun Control Passes the Florida Legislature” right next to “Florida Senate and House Approve MORE GUNS in Schools!”

The Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School Public Safety Act does both.

A summary of The Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School Public Safety Act is below.

Mental Health

In the area of mental health the legislation makes significant changes to keep firearms out of the hands of those suffering from mental illness:

  • Authorizes a law enforcement officer who is taking a person into custody for an involuntary examination under the Baker Act to seize and hold a firearm or ammunition from the person for 24 hours after the person is released and does not have a risk protection order against them or is the subject of a firearm disability.
  • Prohibits a person who has been adjudicated mentally defective or who has been committed to a mental institution from owning or possessing a firearm until a court orders otherwise.
  • Creates a process for a law enforcement officer or law enforcement agency to petition a court for a risk protection order to temporarily prevent persons who are at high risk of harming themselves or others from accessing firearms when a person poses a significant danger to himself or herself or others, including significant danger as a result of a mental health crisis or violent behavior. The bill also:
    • Allows a court to issue a risk protection order for up to 12 months.
    • Requires the surrender of all firearms and ammunition if a risk protection order is issued.
    • Provides a process for a risk protection order to be vacated or extended.

Firearm Safety

The legislation also provides new provisions to ensure full and complete background checks when a firearm is purchased:

  • Requires a three-day waiting period for all firearms, not just handguns or until the background check is completed, whichever is later. Provides exceptions for:
  • Concealed weapons permit holders, and
  • For the purchase of firearms other than handguns, an exception for:
    • Individuals who have completed a 16 hour hunter safety course;
    • Individuals holding a valid Florida hunting license; or
    • Law enforcement officers, correctional officers and service members (military and national guard)

The bill addresses two of the most frequent requests Senators heard from the families of victims simply to raise the age for purchasing a firearm and ban devices that turn a legal firearm into an illegal weapon. 

  • Prohibits a person under 21 years of age from purchasing a firearm, and prohibits licensed firearm dealers, importers, and manufacturers, from selling a firearm, except in the case of a member of the military, or a law enforcement or correctional officer when purchasing a rifle or shotgun. (Persons under 21 years of age are already prohibited from purchasing a handgun under federal law.)
  • Prohibits a bump-fire stock from being imported, transferred, distributed, sold, keeping for sale, offering for sale, possessing, or giving away within the state.

School Safety

The bill improves school safety through the following provisions:

  • Establishes the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School Public Safety Commission to investigate system failures in the Parkland school shooting and prior mass violence incidents, and develop recommendations for system improvements.
  • Codifies the Office of Safe Schools within the Florida Department of Education (DOE) and which will service as a central repository for the best practices, training standards, and compliance regarding school safety and security.
  • Permits a sheriff to establish a Coach Aaron Feis Guardian Program.
    • The legislation allows school districts to decide whether to participate in the guardian program if it is available in their county.
    • A guardian must complete 132 hours of comprehensive firearm safety and proficiency training, pass psychological evaluation, submit to and pass drug tests; and complete certified diversity training. The guardian program is named after Coach Aaron Feis, who lost his life protecting students during the shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School. The guardian program is completely voluntary for a sheriff to establish, for a school district to participate, and for an individual to volunteer. 
    • Individuals who exclusively perform classroom duties as classroom teachers are excluded from participating in a Coach Aaron Feis Guardian Program. However, this limitation does not apply to classroom teachers of a Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps program; a current service member; and a current or former law enforcement officer.
  • Requires each district school board and school district superintendent to cooperate with law enforcement agencies to assign one or more safe-school officers at each school facility.  The safe-school officer requirement can be satisfied by appointing any combination of a school resource officer, a school safety officer, or a school guardian.
  • Requires each district school board to designate a district school safety specialist to serve as the district’s primary point of public contact for public school safety functions.
  • Requires each school district to designate school safety specialists and a threat assessment team at each school, and requires the team to operate under the district school safety specialist’s direction.
  • Requires the DOE to contract for the development of a Florida Safe Schools Assessment Tool which will assist school districts in conducting security assessments to identify threats and vulnerabilities.
  • Creates the mental health assistance allocation to assist school districts in establishing or expanding school-based mental health care.

The legislation also:

  • Prohibits a person from making, posting, or transmitting a threat to conduct a mass shooting or an act of terrorism.
  • Requires DCF to contract for community action treatment teams to provider behavioral health and support services.
  • Requires FDLE to procure a mobile app that would allow students and the community to relay information anonymously concerning unsafe, dangerous threats. The students of Marjory Stoneman Douglass recommended that the program be named “FortifyFL” 

Funding

The legislation appropriates $400 million to implement the bill provisions, including the following:

  • Over $69 million to the DOE to fund the mental health assistance allocation.
  • $1 million for the design and construction of a memorial honoring those who lost their lives on February 14, 2018, at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School.
  • Over $25 million for replacing building 12 at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School.
  • Over $67 million for sheriff’s offices who decide to establish a school guardian program.
  • Over $97 million to aid for the safe schools allocation.
  • Over $98 million to implement a grant program for improving and hardening the physical security of school buildings.
  • $18.3 million to DCF for additional mobile crisis teams to ensure reasonable access among all counties.

The Bill, if signed into law, has a great many moving parts and in all analytical honesty a great many of those are positive steps. The analytics of the failure in law enforcement that led to not flagging the shooter. The programs establishing armed response and security initiatives at the schools and analysis of school vulnerabilities.

Where Florida has lost ground in on gun control.

Florida is set to declare the 2nd Amendment does not apply to adults 18-20 with a couple exceptions if you comply with certain requirements, making the right a privilege. Florida is set to establish a three day waiting period minimum on all purchases. Florida is ready to completely ban the bumpstock.

If Rick Scott, Governor of Florida, signs this law he will have infringed on the rights of his citizens for security theater. None of the measures have a snowball’s chance in hell of preventing a massacre. It’s fluff and window dressing and it did not need to be in this bill.

If the bill would not have passed without these empty provisions then those opponents are either not actually concerned about the safety of the public schools or unfathomably stupid.

Because Guns…

Warning: Excessive use of the word ‘and’ and a singular use of adult language below.

 

The following release (italicized ) was published by the public schools of Lansing MI and are echoed in the majority of arguments around the country that focus solely on firearms.

It is special.

Whereas, there was yet another mass killing in a high school in our country on February 14, 2018 at
Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida where 17 people were killed and thousands
were seriously injured both physically and emotionally;

Yes, another tragedy stuck the nation’s children largely due to the failure of its federal and county law enforcement, including those on site at the school for the express purpose of protecting the school. Oh? Oh, we’re skipping the fact. Ok.

The official number of injured was 14. Extending the ‘wounded’ statistic to thousands is aggrandizing and you might as well say billions at that point.

and

Whereas, this was one of 34 mass shootings in our country from January 1 through February 18 of this
current year; 1 http://www.gunviolencearchive.org/reports/mass-shooting 

The United States’ Congressional Research Service acknowledges that there is not a broadly accepted definition, and defines a “public mass shooting”[2] as one in which four or more people selected indiscriminately, not including the perpetrator, are killed.

The FBI concurs with this definition and the list cited in the letter has multiple incidents that do not meet this definition.

and

Whereas, there is absolutely no reason why children in this nation and this state should not be able to
go to school every day without being afraid for their lives;

This is entirely subjective. I agree I that do not wish for any child to attend school in fear but there are a myriad reasons children and their parents should always hold concern for their lives. How many will die of drunk or distracted driving? How many from gang or domestic violence? How about abduction by a trafficker? How many will drown? A mass shooter is not the sole threat in a child’s world and inferring that through this letter is asinine.

and

Whereas, the most sacred responsibility of all school boards is to do everything in our collective powers
to assure that our students are safe each and every day in our schools, so that they can learn; and
Whereas, students cannot be safe unless and until all guns – other than those carried by trained law
enforcement officers – are banned from our schools;

The trained law enforcement failed Parkland.

You aren’t doing everything in your collective powers. I see no credence being given to those who want to harden schools as a target. The only proposition on the table is ban guns. This is called a subjective agenda. This is not an objective plan for making schools safer.

Michigan Schools are Gun Free Zones, the only exemptions are LEO’s and a current series of statutes that allow persons with valid CPL’s (background checked, certified) to open carry. This open carry is rarely used as it causes panic. The concealed carrying public has offered multiple variations on legal closes of the “open carry loophole” and all have been rejected.

and

Whereas, no civilian should ever be allowed to purchase, possess or use a weapon of mass destruction,
including but not limited to automatic and semi-automatic guns, nor be allowed to purchase, possess or
use any magazine, clip or other tool designed to deliver rapid-fire ammunition without the need to reload;

Subjective. Nonsensical. Asinine.

Weapons of mass destruction include the CBRN (Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear) but it’s apparently acceptable that as public educators they can hijack that definition to include small arms. Automatics and semi-automatics have been available (to the public) for well over a century. Automatics are highly regulated (now) and the legally owned in the country have been used in zero acts of violence in decades.

Semi-automatic is has been the most common for many years. The AR-15 itself was designed in the 50’s yet is only now a problem. There are severe flaws in the logic and it is being bulwarked with emotion to fill the gaps.

What the fuck is “rapid-fire ammunition.” Someone get the chemistry and physics teachers.

and

Whereas, this East Lansing, Michigan School Board has adopted a resolution opposing proposed
Michigan legislation to allow concealed carry in schools and prohibit school boards from taking action to
disallow such activity in our schools (SB 584 and 586);

These would actually close the open carry loophole. These would add public school boards to the list of preemption so they could not enact rules counter to state law, as is befitting of public institutions.

and

Whereas, the East Lansing school board opposes so-called “open carry” in our schools;

So called? What else would you call it? Those bills get rid of it. Why are the licensed and background checked parents, teachers, and faculty of the school who have CPL’s such a threat? Is there any evidence that random concealed carriers will suddenly flock to schools just because it is legal? No? It will just be the people who are there every day already. Doing what they do at the school already. Legally able to be armed like they are at nearly every other public venue already, without random gunfights.

and

Whereas the East Lansing School Board values our teachers too much to expect them to be armed to
protect their students;

There is no language on the table in any form saying it is an expectation. But those teachers who are already legally armed being offered additional training to defend their classrooms taken on a voluntary basis seems like one of the “everything within our collective powers” items. Unarmed teachers should have the option of training too. They should be able to voluntarily seek better ways to protect themselves and their students. They should not be shoveled into a pile of single narrative bias with their opinions on personal defense silenced and ridiculed unless it fully aligns with this posted illogical narrative.

and

Whereas, the Michigan Board of Education is elected statewide to establish school policy on the state
level;

Now, therefore, be it resolved that the East Lansing Board of Education calls upon the Michigan State
Board of Education and the Michigan Superintendent of Public Instruction to oppose all guns in all
Michigan schools other than those carried by trained law enforcement;

Again, the unwavering belief that the problem is solely the presence of firearms and that their written prohibition will actually improve physical security. Asinine.

and

Be it further resolved the East Lansing Board of Education calls upon the Michigan State Board of
Education to take a position to actively oppose SB 584 and 586 which would authorize concealed carry
of guns in schools while prohibiting school boards from taking local action to prohibit concealed carry in
their schools;

Let’s forget that the schools are public property and that the tax paying public who pay for the students and faculty, including those carrying firearms for personal protection, have rights to public property. Preemption.

and

Be it further resolved the East Lansing Board of Education calls upon the Michigan State Board of
Education to take a position to actively oppose open carry in Michigan schools;

Oppose all you wish. It is currently the law and it has been vehemently opposed, by these very people, to being changed.

and

Be it further resolved that the East Lansing Board of Education supports any appropriate actions taken
by East Lansing students, teachers, school administrators, parents and allies in support of the intent of
the East Lansing Walk-out “…calling for students, teachers, school administrators, parents and allies to
take part in a National School Walkout for 17 minutes at 10am across every time zone on March 14,
2018 to protest Congress’ inaction to do more than tweet thoughts and prayers in response to the gun
violence plaguing our schools and neighborhoods….”2 by recognizing and supporting any action our
school community members might take to support these 17 minutes on March 14;

Why not use these 17 minutes to run ANY drill that could actively save lives of students and faculty?

The 1st Amendment and its exercise are sacrosanct however the effectiveness of the time spent exercising can be judged on several metrics including how efficiently the stated message and attached policy recommendations accomplish the final goal. On that metric, this is a colossal failure.

and

Be it further resolved that copies of this resolution be sent to Michigan Superintendent of Public
Instruction, Brian Whiston, the individual members of the Michigan State Board of Education, Governor
Rick Snyder, the district’s State Representatives and Senators and the district’s U.S. Senators and
Congressional Representative.

Yes. Let’s have this group read and respond to this taking valuable time from talking with local and county LE organizations about the up to date nature of their reports on any possible persons who could be flagged as a threat. Let’s take them away from grading and if necessary updating the accessibility, observation, and surveillance of school buildings and making certain policies are fresh and ready between the faculty and responding authorities. Let’s divert from any proven hard target security measures that are employed across the nation to help secure and defend other sites.

Let’s, as a board of publicly elected officials, ignore the part of the public we do not like or agree with and disregard the efficacy of any proposed solution from them…

Because Guns.

Alpacka Raft Launches the Caribou, the Lightest Full-Size Packraft Available

Alpacka Raft Launches the Caribou, the Lightest Full-Size Packraft Available

The new ultralight bikeraft and wilderness adventure boat features Alpacka’s innovative and exclusive Late Rise Design.

MANCOS, Colo. (March 5, 2018) – Alpacka Raft, the industry leader in research and development of modern packrafting, today announced the launch of its new Caribou packraft, a front-end loading and ultralight packraft that offers a modern take on an original classic.

9W7A6166.jpg

The Caribou is the lightest and most packable full-size packraft on the market. A new and innovative bow design at the front of the boat means the boat is built to carry bikes, full-sized packs, big game, and other heavy loads, while keeping the boat balanced on and off water. The Caribou weighs in at only four pounds and 12 ounces.

 

9W7A6143.jpg

“By bringing the Caribou to market, we wanted to provide a better boat for specific uses,” said Thor Tingey, Apacka Raft CEO. “The Caribou, coupled with our new Late Rise Bow, is the ideal packraft for ultralight solo hunting, backpacking, and bikerafting. We’re excited to see what adventures our customers choose to take the Caribou on in the coming months and years.”

 

Additional features of the Caribou include:

  •  Handmade in Mancos, Colorado
  •  Single valve that provides high pressure one-way inflation and easy deflation with a quick twist of the valve core
  • Full-size standard seat
  • 210d High Count Nylon lightweight polyurethane coated tubes
  • 840d Nylon Floor
  • Handle on bow for easy dragging and portaging with gear on the bow
  • 4 bow strap plates oriented for optimal bike attachment, 2 stern grab loops, and a floor loop to attach the seat
  • Optional Cargo Fly (for internal storage in the tubes of the boat)
  • Optional custom Titan-Straps bike strap kit
  • Includes: inflation bag, seat stuff sack, and repair kit

 

The Caribou packraft is available for purchase at select international retailers and on the Alpacka Raft website. Available in Persimmon and Mallard Green colors, the Caribou retails for $795 without the Cargo Fly and $945 with.

 

About Alpacka Raft

Final-Alpacka-logo-yellow-original.jpg

Alpacka Raft started in the fall of 2000 as a collaboration between Sheri Tingey, the designer behind the products, and her son Thor, who had just completed a 600-mile packrafting traverse of Alaska’s Brooks Range and had some ideas for how to make a better performing packraft.

 

Alpacka Raft seeks to design and hand craft the most innovative, premium packrafts available. They strive for a legacy of leadership, stewardship, and support that allows their community of diverse boaters a lifetime of use and adventure-driven fun. Every Alpacka Raft, from cutting the fabric to putting the final touches on a spray deck, is made by hand and shipped to customers from the Alpacka factory in Mancos, Colorado, under the Made in USA standard. Alpacka Raft is one of the largest employers in town.

 

For more, visit www.alpackaraft.com.

So you want to have matching guns…

Picture via Pinterest. Team Hollis chooses H&K

-From Team Hollis

The matching pistols argument.  

Recently, the wife has attained her concealed pistol license and attended a few local IDPA matches; all which led to her going shopping for her own pistol. At least that was the plan.

As it turned out, I have been using the HK VP9 for the last year or so. I love this gun’s grip, function, reputation, and the fact that I didn’t spend an arm and a leg on the coveted HK product. Turns out the wife also liked this… so the choice was simple, share (hell no) or get her one as well. She is more than capable of purchasing her own, but there is just something epic about getting a deal on a solid piece of hardware. So, a few months ago there was a matching HK VP9 in the gun bag.

This caused a chain reaction of events that I am sure you will discover. As you get married, or have that solid range buddy that doesn’t have his own gear… One range bag is not enough. The Mrs now has her own bag. Electronic ear pro. Ammo carriers, cleaning gear.. And so the dominoes start to fall…. Soon holsters were an issue.

When you get married… it’s not just “yours” it’s “ours”. This is how I lost a solid G-code holster that I loved. Note, this is not a downside at all. You can now shop at the gun store, online, whatever; with no repercussions. This $124.99 shopping cart.. could be for her… could be for you…. Who knows!

Now, she has night sights on her VP9.. mine came standard. I have always been a fan of lights where possible and so I now rock an inforce APL on my HK.. which has led to a whole set of new hosters…. This leads to the first valid argument for matching pistols: “The right tool for the job”.

I have always posed that you need a solid rifle, pistol and shotgun. The same could be said for multiple AR platforms for the avid hunter. Multiple pistols/Revolvers for the competitive shooter. Likewise, I have a “day” gun. And a “night gun”.. Sounds super solid as an argument right? Perhaps if one setup was in .22 and was used for practice… I would have a stronger position.

A stronger argument for two of the same pistol make/manufacturer/caliber is the magazine argument.

One set of magazines!

The strongest reason I can see for having two of the same guns is really the ability to have one stashed somewhere, use one as the EDC (Every Day Carry) and all the while, have the same spare magazines. All that act the same, reload the same, interchange, store., etc.

There are probably six to eight HK vp9 magazines rolling around in gun bags or stashed in glove compartments around here. And it does not matter is my wife is slaying muggers or we are headed off to a pistol match and need just one more magazine, it all works the same.

Magazine carriers can be worn at a match, but my wife can load mags for me, or vice versa, while the other is on the line about to shoot. We always have a set ready to go. It’s like having a whole set of spares available… as long as you flushed the toilet, or put the seat down… or whatever odd requests may pop up when you need a spare mag and can’t find one. More on this later as I investigate.

I am not the only one!

It is true. My best friend and his wife actually have matching pistols as well. This was the prompting for this article, when we were at the range last week… and I saw that we had 4 pistols, but only two makes/models. They have matching Smith and Wesson M&P’s in 9mm. They have full size pistols, one is the pro version with the upgraded trigger that Tim carries while Hannah, his wife, carries the standard 9mm with the built in Crimson Trace laser grip which I must admit is totally sweet.

As it turns out, we may have the same pistols as our spouses, but they are all unique in their sight selection, grip size, and the addition of lights, lasers, and triggers.

But really….  

You just want to dual wield. We all know it is what you are thinking. It sounds all good, the matching magazines. The tactical accessories applications. The “tool for the job” arguments. In all reality, you just want to have the ability to…. In the rare event that you get to… go all Bad Boys 1 and 2, for about 3 seconds of dual pistol action Wyatt Erp glory….

Until you realize…

You don’t own a left handed holster,

Yet.

 

——-

Chris / TeamHollis

Trump Trump’s the Trump Slump: Gun Control talk has thinned the stock of firearms nationwide.

The title image was sent to me from Southwick’s of Plainwell, MI. My friends down there usually have a healthy stock of AR-15’s and similar rifles and they have been slow business in the year since Trump was elected.

They still have a few left but the supply and demand have certainly inverted.

Other stores are cleaned out completely.

President Trump’s vocal support for various gun control measures has reignited the panic buy market. It’s given a welcome influx of cash assets to the stores heretofore struggling due to the market’s sudden shift. When Trump was elected the plateauing market suddenly went full stop. Gun purchases became entirely about want and hunting the best deal became the name of the game. You could wait and get the gun you wanted now because no one was coming for your guns.

Trump changed that by voicing publicly that due process was on the chopping block along with the guns themselves.

Overnight the AR market shifted to need again.

H.R. 5087 introduced last week drove the motivation further. All those people who weren’t coming for the guns were now coming for the guns.

The loud, emotionally passionate, and fairly articulate voices of the teenagers victimized in Parkland were immediately put center stage by the anti-gun organizations and handed talking points that sounded great. They could garner the sympathy of being children and be given a false credence of expertise and authority for sounding like adults and being child victims.

The unique combination of national sympathy for children and the clear voiced nature of the victims gave a momentum to the agenda that Garland, Texas and Las Vegas, Nevada did not.

The President responded on the “we must do something” line of dialogue. That dialogue is the same proposing gun bans and 2nd Amendment repeal. The man who promised the assault on our 2nd Amendment rights was over gave the greatest fuel to the renewed attack and subsequent fear of the loss of constitutional rights.

What to do today?

Keep an eye on the bills making there way through congress and let your voice be heard.

Continue too, to vote with your wallet and support those businesses that support your rights.

Check you local gun store. (If it’s Dick’s or Field and Stream don’t bother, go to the next one) or hit up the guys online. Operation Parts still has a few and Southwick’s did too if you’re in the area.

But more importantly go to the digital halls of congress and let them know where certain bills need to end up.

Oakley Chamber Range Bag

This week, Matt Owen goes over is EDC Bag for his SBR.  He does into detail on the Oakley Chamber Range Bag – Enjoy!

This bus station is always the busiest, and you stand with your back to a wall watching the crowds gather and disperse. You try to passively take in everyone and see if anything stands out, and sure enough – there’s one. You know, that guy. An otherwise innocuous tennis bag is slung over his shoulder, which would be anything but noteworthy except that he’s also wearing 5.11 tactical pants, a pair of Salomons, a Grunt Style t-shirt, and a pre-tattered cap with a Spartan helmet on it. That bag isn’t fooling many people; that’s no tennis racket, and he’s no Federer.

Fortunately for you, carrying covertly comes easy, and as the bus doors swing open for your route, you confidently step on board knowing your bag draws as much attention as a second-hand “Vouis Litton” from the flea market. It may not wow the guys at the range – at least, not until you open it – but then again, that’s not what being low profile is all about, is it?

When I built my SBR, I wanted to have a way to carry it to and from work (I worked at a firearms retail store for a long time) without making it obvious what I was doing. I realized that my options were pretty limited; not necessarily because of what was available, but because what I was wanting clashed with what was possible. When you have a 10.5” upper, even with a nifty collapsing stock like the Troy Tomahawk, you’re still looking at a lengthy piece. A regular old backpack won’t fit it, so you’re going to have to get that ugly tennis bag and look ridiculous, a tactical bag that advertises your intentions, or a big Eberlestock-style “hiking” bag that would look utterly insane as you ride around on the Metro.

It wasn’t until working the Orlando Gun Show one day that I spotted a potential solution, and after haggling it down to a fair price I took it home and gave it a go. Almost three years later, I haven’t looked back! Since the precedent was set in an earlier article, let’s start with the cons first and finish on a high note, and you can see if the Oakley Range Bag is something you want to add to your tool kit. *Note: While Oakley has discontinued selling it on their website, it’s still available through multiple online retailers.

Cons

Officially dubbed the “Black Chamber Range Bag”, this pack is a normal-size backpack offering a large amount of space. However, I don’t like the internal layout. There are no dedicated mag pouches, be it pistol or AR, and the pouches that are there leave mags flopping around or zipped away. Adding those in or even providing internal PALS webbing to allow the user to add their own would be a nice plus.

Perhaps it’s nitpicking, but the detachable mini-bag on the front is also a complaint for me. While it’s nice to be able to have a “to go” portion, if I don’t want to leave it on there, the buckles flop around like four small tentacles. Strangely enough, the pack boasts the ability to remove this and clip it over your chest via the main straps; not only does that completely negate your low-pro appearance, but it also means they knew the buckles would be unused and still didn’t add a solution.

Another issue I had was how wide it opened or didn’t open really. If all you had in here were a couple textbooks for class and a small laptop, you’d be golden, but trying to pull out a typical range kit (or, for me, an SBR) would prove difficult. The zippers barely made it to being vertical, so the opening was always a little tight, and folding the bag over was a half-ass solution that often-made things more frustrating.

My last gripe is purely superficial, and that’s the color options. It’s available in Nothing Special Black, Look At Me Olive Drab, and Please “Stare At Me Multicam”. Throw in a couple gray-man-ready color schemes, like a navy-and-white or gray-and-blue, so people using this as an EDC for all things tactical feel more assured they aren’t drawing weird looks.

Pros

The biggest thing for me is the biggest thing – the main compartment. I used to carry my SBR broken down and it fit perfectly with plenty of room to spare. There’s a Velcro bar across the back near the top that comes with a retention loop; add a second one on there and the SBR was snug but easily accessible. Despite the varying sizes and needs for SBRs and pistol-types, the Chamber Range Bag was able to meet a few different models I tried in the shop, including a Draco pistol, and leave me the space to drop in extras.

The two pouches on the side also came into play for me. Though seemingly small, they have ample room as well, and I fit my Ms. Clean First Aid Kit, fire-starter kit, LifeStraw, Clif Bar, and compass into one, leaving the other for my battery backup, emergency blanket, chemlights, flashlight, and larger-than-pocket knife. By playing with the spread, I was able to balance the weight perfectly and not create fatigue on one side or the other while still having everything I felt I needed in an EDC.

The back sleeve also came into play during some road trips and training seminars for my next job. It has ample room for even a bulky Alienware, so those of you with the newest Macbook Air or XPS 13 will find it perfect, and it offers two divided sections for your Top Secret dossier and latest edition of Recoil magazine to slip into. Those of you worried about impact should fear not, as the pack sports a solid backboard and has a cushioned liner between the SBR section and the laptop section.

Definitely worth noting is the fact that after almost three years of use, the only wear that is visible is some discoloration (my fault for leaving it in the car, then in the workshop, then under the dog) and some wrinkles in the shoulder straps (but don’t we all wrinkle with age?). The interior has yet to rip anywhere, all zippers function as they did on day one, and the buckles still snap like a bolt going home.

Lastly, and maybe even more important than the interior size, is the appearance. I didn’t want to look like “Andre Agassi meets Taran Butler”, I didn’t want to wear an olive drab billboard, and I certainly didn’t want to be that crazy guy with a 4-foot tall hiking backpack in the middle of Orlando. Oakley’s solution, be it intentional or not, has been the perfect balance of tactical readiness with gray-man blend-ability.

For an average of $150, it’s hard to go wrong, and if it means you’re not looking like a strange mix of Rafael Nadal and The Punisher, then pick one up and disappear into the crowds.

Source: http://www.thegearlocker.net/2018/02/oakley-chamber-range-bag/

Your First Match

From Team Hollis

The world of competitive shooting can be extremely intimidating, let alone being a female in a male dominated sport. I was exposed to my first IDPA match in June of 2017. My husband practically dragged me there. I hadn’t had much practice with my HK VP9. I knew the basic fundamentals but not nearly enough in my eyes. I, like most females that take up this sport, are stubborn, independent, type A, “we don’t want anyone’s help” kinda women.

After sitting through the beginner safety course, I knew right away that it was going be a very long day. I wanted to fall back into the comfort zone of my M4. Where I knew I could perform well. However, the boss-man refused to let me have my way and insisted I stepped out the my comfort zone.

I set my standards extremely high and more often than not, I put extreme amounts of pressure on myself to do just as well as the men. Needless to say, with my inexperience, low confidence and competitive spirit, my first few stages of the match went horribly wrong. Slow draws, missed targets and running out of time were begging to become a habit.

By the time we reached lunch, I was ready to crawl into a hole and never shoot pistol again. I had failed “in my eyes” at obtaining my objective. My husband did very well, and was supportive as he always is, but I am my own worst critic. Words didn’t mean a whole lot at that time, as I knew I hadn’t performed well.

After sulking for about a week, I had a “come to jesus moment” with myself and decided to “let” someone help out. As usual my husband came to the rescue and was standing by, waiting for me to ask for help. After dropping some stubborn walls, I started to understand the concepts and fundamentals further. I figured out what I was doing wrong and started fixing those mistakes.  I learned alot from my first match. Although it did not go as I had planned or wanted, I was also naive to believe I could do phenomenally well with very little experience. “Beginners luck” doesn’t beat experience through talent.

If I could give you any advice it would be-

1) Listen to those who have been shooting longer

2) You probably aren’t going to start winning matches right from the start

3) Good results will take a lot of time and effort

4) Your self confidence will grow with time

5) If you think you’ve got something down, do it again.. And again

6) Enjoy yourself, keep the fundamentals

7) Don’t give up

I am happy to report through hours of hard work spent at the range, and listening to others, my pistol shooting is getting better. It isn’t world class competitive level, but it’s a hell of alot better than where it was. And, as comfortable as you may be with a different weapon, use the one you suck at the most!

  • Great things never came from comfort zones

Candace

We Like Shooting 235 – The Goose Flies at Midnight

Welcome to the We Like Shooting show, Episode 235 – tonight we’ll talk about Rent a reticle, F4 Defense, Aaron’s 9mm AR, Sig Sauer P365, Tactical AR, guns, shooting, firearms, nra, 2ndamendment and more!

Source: https://welikeshooting.com/show/235/

The Dry Fire Primer and Me and You

I’m not a Grand Master, it’s true. So why did I write a book about how to get better at shooting, and why should anyone read it?

Let’s start at the beginning, with the area of shooting I focused on – dry fire, also known as dry practice.

Dry fire is a hot idea among gun owners who want to become more proficient with their firearms. It’s recommended in many training classes and you can find articles and books about it all over the internet.

Since dry fire allows you to work on your shooting skills without firing a single round of ammunition, the advantages seem obvious. You don’t need to spend time and money going to the range, making it easier to fit into both your schedule and your budget.

The idea, at its most basic, is that you can take an unloaded gun and practice pulling the trigger while aimed at some sort of target. A common variation is to balance a coin on the front sight, with the goal being to be able to press the trigger without letting the coin drop.

At the other end of the spectrum, folks are practicing entire competition stages or defensive scenarios with empty guns. They’re running around, reloading, and sometimes using gadgets like SIRT pistols.  

Both extremes are dry fire, and so is an awful lot of stuff in between. The question isn’t so much what dry fire is, but how much it can include and how it can be used best to help someone become a better shooter.

To answer that, I wrote The Dry Fire Primer. It’s a distillation of lessons I’ve learned on my journey from rather mediocre shooter to where I’m at today. While I continue to have a lot of room for improvement, I’ve become a consistently strong performer on the range even when I haven’t been able to get in much live fire practice.

In the process, I’ve had a lot of opportunity to think about what it takes to get from Point A to Point B. I’ve also picked the brains of experts across disciplines from simply dry fire to technical shooting performance to the all-important mental game. I haven’t limited myself to the firearms world either, looking at learning and practice techniques from other sports as well as areas like musical performance.

The culmination is a slim volume that talks about the whys and hows of dry fire. Rather than give you a series of drills that, frankly, wouldn’t be up to the standards of the excellent books already on the market, The Dry Fire Primer shows you what you need to know to get the most out of that material.

It tells you why you need dry fire in your life, and how you can fit it into your busy schedule. It explains how to set up, safely and effectively, for your practice sessions. It talks about the mysterious concept of par time, and how you can use it to make you a faster, more efficient shooter under pressure. It helps you understand what you should be paying attention to so that your dry fire is an effective learning tool. It points out what dry fire can accomplish – and what it can’t.

The Dry Fire Primer is aimed not only at newer shooters who are trying to establish their dry fire routines, but at more experienced shooters who are looking to revitalize their practice. Maybe you don’t know where or how to get started. Or maybe you’ve hit a plateau in your improvement, or you’re bored with dry fire.  I include suggestions on all of these, drawn not just from my research, but also from my own experiences and that of my students.

 

Want to learn more? The electronic version of the book is available for Amazon Kindle, and printed copies are available both direct and from an increasing number of your favorite retailers.

The GAT Daily welcomes Annette Evans of Beauty Behind the Blast

Annette with a Daniel Defense DDM4v7 SBR

The GAT Publishing Network is always looking to pull from a diverse group of industry experts to give our readers the most thorough coverage we can accomplish on a wide variety of topics. We have veterans, doctors, instructors, and a variety of specialized technical experts who have shared their time, talents, and valuable information with our audience.

Continuing that mission we are pleased to announce Annette Evans  of Beauty Behind the Blast, as our newest contributing author.

Annette brings a wealth of technical and competitive knowledge to our talent pool in addition to a greater female perspective.

Look for her reviews, opinions, training tips, and technical discussions here starting today with her first piece on her new book.

The Dry Fire Primer.

The article and link to the book will be up shortly.

 

Annette, thank you and welcome to the team.