When most people think “Concealed Carry,” they think about just putting a shirt, jacket, or vest over their carry handgun. The truth is that concealment is so much more than that, and it’s not a binary on or off. It’s a sliding scale based on a variety of circumstances. When I took the Green Ops Covert Carry Skills class in February, there was a discussion about the differences between Concealed and Covert.
Concealed Carry vs. Covert Carry
Mike talked about the difference being the severity of consequences suffered if you’re discovered to be armed.
I feel like the gun-carrying public could benefit from overhauling their ideas and moving more towards covert vs. concealed carry.
This can be done in several ways:
The obvious one is to make sure you’re not dressing like “a gun guy.” Or even dressing like someone who is unlikely to be carrying a firearm.
Possibly carrying a smaller gun, based on the situation
Being more thoughtful and attentive about the efficacy of our concealment
Along these same lines, Claude Werner commented in a podcast appearance on the difference between a “Denied Area” and a true “Non-Permissive Environment.”
What delineates one from the other is that while guns may be forbidden in a denied area, there tend to be more active measures taken to ensure that in an NPE.
Biden’s out, and presumptively, Harris is in. Vice President Kamala Harris is extremely likely to be the next Democratic candidate for President. We all know Biden has flip-flopped on guns over the years. His Presidency has been a constant war on gun owners. While Biden sucked for gun owners, Harris seems much worse. She has a long history of being extremely anti-gun. It’s become a core issue of her candidacy.
Gun owners need to be ready for the potential of a Harris presidency. They need to be prepared to resist gun control efforts at every turn. At a recent campaign event, she wasted no time announcing her plans to institute an ineffective assault weapons ban. She also pushed Minority Report-style Red Flag Laws and corporatist universal background checks.
This isn’t a new attitude for her. Winning a legal fight requires us to know our opponent, and as such, let’s review Vice President Harris’ extensive anti-gun background.
Vice President Kamala Harris
Vice President Kamala Harris was placed in charge of the Office of Gun Violence Prevention. This office helps enforce and disseminate the President’s executive orders on gun control. Its main purpose was to backdoor gun control into the United States through any means possible. Gun control loses at the polls and loses in Federal Courts and Congress.
Things like ATF’s rulemaking against frames and receivers, pistol braces, and the crackdown on who is and who is not a dealer come from this office. This effort got Bryan Malinowski murdered by ATF agents when they conducted a no-knock raid in the middle of the night. Those agents conveniently forgot to wear their bodycams. They targeted Malinowski because he sold parts of his private collection.
Democratic Candidate Harris in 2019
Kamala Harris ran for President in 2019 but failed to secure her nomination. While running, Harris took a hard-line stance against firearms. She declared she would take executive action within her first 100 days if Congress didn’t act. As a candidate, she openly advocated for door-to-door confiscation and bragged about doing just that in California as Attorney General.
She also promised to take Red Flag Laws to the next level by targeting racists and other bigots for firearm confiscation. Vice President Harris called these Domestic Terrorism Prevention Orders. She claimed if there was evidence that a person intended to commit a hate crime, they could lose their gun rights.
No one likes racists, but the evidence included anti-immigrant rhetoric. This sounds an awful lot like if you believe in border security, you can lose your gun rights. Any kind of Minority Report pre-crime measures should be shot down. We live in a society that is established by law and courts.
Pre-Presidential Harris
As a Senator, Kamala Harris rallied against firearms at every turn. She was vocal on social media, calling for a nationwide assault weapons ban. She didn’t seem to do much as a Senator. As California Attorney General, she fought against Californian Civil Rights at every turn.
In 2013, she was responsible for creating the microstamping rule in California. The rule stated that any new semi-auto handgun sold in California had to have a micro-stamped serial number on the firing pin. This would stamp the serial number onto each cartridge. Keep in mind this technology does not exist and effectively banned all new semi-auto handguns in California.
Then AG Kamala Harris fought to resist Heller and the individual right to keep and bear arms, as well as the Peruta v. County of San Diego Case. In the latter, she went above and beyond to try to restrict citizens’ rights.
In 2014, she also instructed the California Department of Justice to target and cite four gun stores over their window displays. Yes, she’s that petty. The argument was that the displays violated California law on firearm advertisements.
Be Ready To Resist
Kamala Harris will be a nightmare for American civil rights. Her violation of her oath to the Constitution should not be ignored. As gun owners, we need to be educated. Educated and ready to support the gun rights organizations fighting to maintain and gain back our rights as Americans. Do not be lazy or complacent just because most of Biden’s attempts have failed.
It was a minor piece of firearms news when the US Army changed the name of their new SIG rifle from the XM5 to the XM7. Their reasoning is the fact that Colt produces an M5 carbine. Colt produced the original M4 series rifles, and the M5 was an extension of that series. Why the company skipped M6 is a bit up in the air. Maybe it’s because LWRC makes the M6 series or because the m6 was an Air Force survival weapon. Who knows? What is known is that Colt has used the nomenclature M5, which goes a lot further than the original M4 or the SIG M7.
The M5 and the SAWS Program
SAWS does not stand for Squad Automatic Weapon in this acronym. It stands for Small Arms Weapon Systems. The SAWS program dates back to 1965. This program intended to test numerous modern rifles and machine guns to find which would be best for the rifle squad. The SAWS program had numerous candidates, including the already adopted M16, as well as the Stoner 63 in various configurations, the AR-18, the Colt CMG, Colt Heavy Assault Rifle, and more.
These candidates would be tested against the current crop of Soviet weapons, including the AK, the RPD, and DPM, as well as the M14, M14E1, and M60 machine guns. It’s worth noting that some of the candidates never made it to the testing phase. The AR-18 dropped out, as did the Colt Submachine Gun, and two rifles never existed among the candidates.
This all ties back to the name M5. Specifically, Colt named these two nonexistent rifles CAR-15 M5. In 1965, both guns were listed in the SAWS candidate’s pamphlets, which is where our only photos come from. The photos are listed as Artist’s Concept. It’s the only two guns that wear that title in the pamphlet.
The Two M5 Rifles
The M5 rifles are often mistaken for some form of Colt 703. The Colt 703 was an experimental AR converted to a long-stroke gas piston system. It’s easy to see why that assumption is made. However, we didn’t see the 703 until 1969, and the M5 series was in a pamphlet from 1965.
Part of that assumption comes from the fact that the M5 series lacks any form of receiver extension. The guns appear to have a tube running from the AR front sight gas block to the rear of the gun that could conceal a piston system of some kind. We’ve seen a functional design of this concept through the OA-93 from Olympic Arms.
There are two CAR-15 M5 concepts. One has a zany-looking fixed stock, and the other has a wire-type under-folding stock. Both appear to have very short barrels and spoon-style flash suppressors. The fixed stock eliminates the inline design of the AR, which would be a mistake. The inline stock helps reduce muzzle rise and greatly benefits the AR design. At least the underfolding stock offers a much smaller overall size.
When you look at the text below the fixed-stock M5 concept, it seems the picture doesn’t match the descriptive text. It lists the barrel as 20 inches, weighs 6.1 pounds, and has an overall length of 35 inches. The M16 had a 38.8-inch overall length and weighed 6.37 pounds. It seems like the fixed stock would be the ‘rifle’ version but used a short barrel in the concept.
The other M5 is called the M5A1 and lists the barrel length as 10 inches, with an overall length of 29.2 inches and a weight of 5.1 pounds. The M5A1 is the carbine variant of the M5.
What Happened?
Whatever happened to the concepts seemed to need more time. This might have been an early 703 concept, but there is no evidence of that. The guns never made it beyond the concept phase. The SAWS program declared the M16 to be the best weapon to equip a squad with, with the Stoner 63 taking second place. It’s fascinating, and the folding stock version looks awesome, but sadly, it never made it beyond the concept phase.
The Trijicon RCR (Ruggedized Closed Reflex) red-dot is Trijicon’s premium enclosed-emitter red-dot sight. It originally launched during the middle of last summer in tandem with the open-emitter Trijicon RMR-HD. Both the RCR and RMR-HD currently represent the latest in Trijicon’s micro red-dot optics suite. I’ve been using the RCR on both my Walther PDP Steel Frame pistol and on a Glock 34 [where it currently sits].
Trijicon RCR (Ruggedized Closed Reflex) Overview
No sharp corners!
The Trijicon Ruggedized Closed Reflex is a compact enclosed-emitter red-dot sight that uses a single 3.25 MOA solid red-dot reticle. It is probably best described as a “helmeted” and reinforced Trijicon RMR. In fact, both the RCR and RMR maintain the same deck height. This helps maintain consistency across taller backup iron sight systems used in conjunction with slide-mounted dots.
In person, I find the RCR looks smaller than one would expect, considering that enclosed-emitter reflex sights tend to have a “thicker” composition by virtue of their design goals. In order to properly cover the entirety of the RMR-pattern footprint, the base of the RCR constitutes the longest part of its external housing.
The rest of the sight is fairly compact and has a shape that more resembles a 3-D cube as opposed to the “rectangular mailboxes” of the Aimpoint ACRO or Holosun 509T, for example. One of the details I appreciate about the RCR is that all four of its topmost corners are “dehorned” for convenience—and no doubt for better concealment, as tall, solid corners have a bad tendency to print or pierce fabric.
The Capstan Screw System
Perhaps the most remarkable aspect of the Trijicon RCR is the fact that despite its enclosed-emitter design, the Trijicon engineering team designed it to work with the current Trijicon RMR/SRO optics footprint. Aside from Trijicon itself, this is currently one of the most popular and co-opted micro red-dot optics mounting footprints in the industry. The RCR is able to mount to any RMR-pattern surface by means of its unique Capstan screw system, something I’ve previously written about as I found it extremely fascinating, interesting, and creative.
Despite the novelty of the RCR’s mounting adaptation, I’ve not had a single issue with any Capstan screws. I certainly did my best to follow the installation instructions, including using Trijicon’s offbeat “torquing” trick involving the Allen wrench. When the time came to swap the RCR out from the Walther PDP SF to my Glock 34, neither of the Capstan screws had loosened, and it took some effort to break their torque to undo them.
This was after taking the RCR (on the Walther PDP SF) to the two different pistol classes I covered earlier this year. And if memory serves correct, there was at least one USPSA weekend match where I certainly ran the gun and optic combo quite strenuously.
Battery And Controls
RCRs are designed with their battery tray and cover sitting on the roof of the unit, so battery access is extremely convenient. The RCR accepts a CR 2032 battery that provides a median runtime of six years on “setting 5.”
The style and layout of the RCR’s controls and buttons will look familiar to anyone who has experience shooting with other Trijicon-made red-dot sights like the RMR, SRO, RMR-CC, etc. Sitting alone on the left side of the body is the (+) button to increase the reticle’s brightness, with the (-) button sitting opposite on the right.
Dialing for windage on elevation is “smooth” without any tactile clicks. It’s best to keep an eye on the windage or elevation adjustment hash marks to aid in zeroing and drifting shot impacts. The lack of tactile clicks isn’t ideal, but on the bright side, the slots on the RCR are generously sized, and the rim of most any pistol or revolver casing will work as a tool.
Window And Dot
The objective lens of the Trijicon RCR sits well behind the leading edge of its durable external housing to protect it from impacts. Nearly every reflex sight has a certain level of tinting needed to capture the emitted LED light and project it onto the objective lens, and the RCR is no exception. However, it does have that darker “signature” Trijicon blue tint, like many other products in Trijicon’s catalog.
Some gentle distortion is also noticeable when looking through the objective lens, but nothing that has hindered shooting. While both the RCR and the RMR share many characteristics, the RCR’s objective lens is slightly smaller and subtly different than the RMR’s lens. No doubt some of this shrinking comes from adapting it to its fully enclosed housing. I find that its objective lens is very similar in dimensions to the objective lens of the Holosun EPS Carry sight.
The rear window of the RCR is also slightly larger than the front objective. The disparity in size isn’t much, so there is no aperture/peephole effect to worry about when looking through the sight with proper target focus.
Reticle View. Source: Trijicon
Reticle-wise, I have no complaints. Trijicon reflex sights, in my experience, tend to project very clean, crisp, and round dots, and the 3.25 MOA red dot on the RCR is no exception. The “diameter” of this 3.25 MOA dot lends itself well for most pistol shooting, regardless of type, as the reticle is neither too large nor too small.
I had no issues with daylight brightness or refresh rates. However, the slope of the objective lens can, in certain cases, reflect a false dot from high overhead sunlight.
The Takeaway
The majority of my shooting with the Trijicon RCR has been in conjunction with my Walther PDP Match Steel Frame pistol. As mentioned previously, I’ve taken this pistol and dot to matches and training classes.
Functionally and mechanically, the sight has worked without issue. From a pure performance shooting standpoint, I find the sight and window to feel too “tight.” Certainly, some of this comes with the trade-off of fielding an enclosed red dot, which is optimized for maximum durability above all else. The same could be said of the RCR’s “arch-rival,” the Aimpoint ACRO.
To be more specific, this has to do with the Trijicon RCR’s battery tray location directly on the top of the sight. In order to accommodate the battery, the “top edge” of the sight is thicker. When seen from the shooter’s perspective, I find that the edge can get in the way when trying to quickly find the dot. This isn’t a disqualification of the sight, but it’s a quirk to be aware of. It can also be managed with regular practice and dry fire.
With a fairly compact and dehorned housing that’s sealed off from the elements, the Trijicon RCR shines best on the slide of a carry or duty gun, if my experience in carrying a Glock 34 with it in the appendix position is any indication.
If you’re like me, you turn to YouTube when you’re trying to learn a new skill or educate yourself on a topic. It should be no surprise that anyone with a camera and an internet connection can share their opinion with the world, regardless of how meritorious it may or may not be. But who should you turn to for your information? Style influencers or lifestyle bloggers?
I’ve seen several style influencers that have recommended some rather questionable concealed carry methods that don’t hold up to pressure testing. I don’t blame them per se. They don’t know any better.
This is just a reminder to make sure that you’re getting information from the right sources. Just because there’s a shared interest doesn’t mean that they’re qualified to speak on the topic.
A singular source for all the answers is certainly alluring, but more often than not, it tends to be a trap.
The closer perspective is entirely me just trying out a slightly different look, and in no way an attempt to hide the fact that my fly was down for the duration of this video….
So, in a topic that is both current and annoying, people are asking why America isn’t better at Olympic shooting sports. Caleb tackles that question in his trademark solo style
American Tactical just announced the new TRX Bronco bolt-action rifle. The Bronco is part of American Tactical’s Black Creek line and is built to be a compact, lightweight rifle for the ranch, range, or backcountry hunting.
The TRX Bronco
The TRX Bronco uses the Black Creek TRX Short action, which can drop into any Tikka T3 chassis. It’s offered in both .308 Winchester and 6.5 Creedmoor and is guaranteed to shoot 1 MOA with commercial ammunition. Currently, two barrel lengths are listed, 16.5 and 18.5 inches. Although it doesn’t expressly say, from looking at the pics and video, it appears to have a factory-threaded barrel.
American Tactical is also teasing a short 9-inch barreled version if you watch the video on the product page. It feeds from double-stacked AR10/SR25 magazines, which are readily available and give plenty of capacity. The TRX action is fitted with a TriggerTech REM700 field trigger.
The TRX Bronco Hunter uses the two-piece, adaptable chassis system. It comes with a 10-inch forend, but you can swap that out for other lengths as well. The chassis is made of aircraft-grade aluminum and is fitted with a folding stock. The stock captures the bolt handle when folded. This, along with a patent-pending safety wedge, locks the rifle in the “safe” position. As a result, the rifle is unable to fire when the stock is folded. This lets you store it fully loaded in your pack or vehicle and know that it cannot fire but is still ready to go when you fold open the stock.
If you’ve been looking for a compact, lightweight rifle that still packs enough punch for most any North American big game, then check out the TRX Bronco Hunter.
Caliber: .308 WIN & 6.5 CM Weight: 6.9 lbs Capacity: 10 rd. AR-10 Compatible Magazine Included Trigger: Triggertech Field Trigger Barrel: 16.5 and 18.5 inches Chassis: 13 inch Modular Chassis Stock: Side Folding Colors: Black and Tan MSRP: $1499.95
My Beretta 92X Performance 9mm pistol, pictured in its current-day configuration with LOK wraparound Veloce grips.
In the autumn of 2020, I purchased a Beretta 92X Performance pistol. For the better part of two years after the purchase, that Beretta handgun became my go-to shooter. It was the gun I took to training classes and my gun of choice for USPSA. In fact, it was the gun that I was shooting when I first started to learn how action pistol matches worked in the first place.
Why Re-Hash the Beretta 92X Performance?
Even amongst all the handguns in my safe today, this Beretta is still one of my personally owned guns with a higher-than-average round count (by my own standards). Most importantly, it was the first handgun I ever reviewed in any way for any publication. You’re welcome to read that review here, and though I’m still content with my writing, it was an atypical review, to say the least.
I was a brand-new writer and still getting a grasp on the craft. For fun, I’ve decided to write a “re-review” of my Beretta 92X Performance. Moreover, my pistol-shooting skills and understanding of handguns themselves have also evolved in tandem with my writing. Enough has changed, and it prompted me to try writing about this pistol again from my 2024 perspective.
I’ll also fully admit to hardly shooting my 92X Performance these days because I’m tied up shooting and writing other handgun reviews while also focusing on guns with dots. But it has been nice to pull it out of its spot from the safe and revisit it, like catching up with an old friend.
Every Beretta 92 with a Brigadier slide has this “mountain” side profile on the slide. This is a macro shot I took with my phone when I first bought mine. To say I was thrilled was an understatement.
500 Years, One Passion, and Atonement
On a personal level, the 92 series has always been something of a passion project for me. A few months ago, I also wrote another article related to the M9, and even though that project didn’t involve any range time, I really enjoyed drafting it because it served as a reminder of just how much I enjoy these guns.
The same is true of my “old” Beretta 92X Performance, which has gone by my wayside. It doesn’t have a dot, and it hasn’t been in any of my recent projects, either. However, it’s nice to be reminded of things one appreciates and just how much joy they used to bring, especially this [92XP0 one] because it’s a steel-framed Beretta 92.
For the longest time, steel-frame Beretta 92 models of any stripe were expensive, rare, and difficult to find. So when Beretta launched the 92X Performance in 2019 globally and made the gun more accessible to the masses, I and any other serious Beretta 92 enthusiast considered it a “big deal.”
With that said, I’m also not blind to the fact that many of these guns produced during the COVID era had several reliability issues, especially in terms of firing, cycling, and quality control. I know this tainted the poor 92X Performance’s reputation, considering that the Beretta 92 pattern as an archetype is generally viable, extremely reliable, and proven.
Anecdotally, it appears to me that most of the guns with problems were made between 2021-2022. I’m under the impression that by this point in time, 2024, all of those kinks and issues have been handled because I haven’t heard any chatter about these since spring 2023. I also haven’t heard of any more issues from shooters at my club who use them, either.
Malfunction Free
Speaking from my experience shooting my own 92X Performance, which was manufactured at some point during 2020, I’ve never faced major issues or malfunctions. I’ve fired all manner of 9mm handloads and factory rounds. Across a few thousand rounds (between 3 to 5 thousand in my estimation), I’ve had only two seemingly random feedway stoppages, both from factory ammunition, ironically.
Even so, these were so odd that I can’t rule out user error or the lube drying up. It is hard to diagnose stoppages in the middle of a USPSA stage when the timer is running, after all. In the grand scheme of things, along with my cumulative experience shooting Beretta 92s, these are insignificant.
Beretta 92X Performance Overview, Frame and Trigger
The Beretta 92X Performance is a full-size pistol chambered for 9mm Luger. It was created for sport shooting and employs a locking-block delayed blowback mechanism made famous by the German Walther P.38 military pistol. The 92X Performance is specifically manufactured and assembled in Italy and has Italian and European CIP proofmarks.
A near perfect Dot Torture Target (49/50) I shot during the early days. In single-action, Beretta 92s tend to perform well which is one of their greatest attributes. Unfortunately, a slow-fire drill like Dot Torture won’t expose the nuances (good or bad) about a gun’s grip.
Over the decades, Beretta has refined this semi-automatic locking block action and developed it into something quite reliable. The system also confers certain advantages over other contemporary designs, such as a very short and nearly horizontal path from the magazine’s feed lips into the chamber.
With locking blocks, barrels need not tilt, either. The tabs of the locking block will pivot and fall out, allowing the slide to travel to the rear and for the action to cycle.
This is one reason Beretta 92 slides are also nearly fully open from the top. There’s no need for material there. This also benefits the gun’s ejection, as there is hardly anything to block brass from flying out.
Steel Frame
The 92 X Performance is built around a steel frame instead of the typical aluminum material that most Beretta 92 frames use. The heavier steel frame on this model weighs roughly a pound more than the aluminum units. But since it’s built for sport, the extra weight is advantageous in resisting the 9mm recoil impulse.
The result is a full-size pistol that’s extremely soft-shooting and easy to control in that sense. The trade-off is the heavier weight, which is certainly noticeable when the gun sits in a competition holster. Anyone who has worked with a CZ Shadow 2 will relate.
The steel frame on this model includes a practical Picatinny railed dustcover and a gently curved trigger guard that’s visually different from the typical 92 frame with the sharp corner. Unfortunately, the grip portion uses the cramped Beretta Vertec profile. I say, unfortunately, because this profile specifically leaves something to be desired and makes the gun feel like a “compact” (think CZ Shadow 2 Compact, Glock 19, etc.) in the hand, as opposed to the heavy and full-size pistol the 92X Performance truly is.
In the same vein, its downward-angled beavertail is something I’m also not fond of. I find it gets in the way of building a solid grip quickly. While attractive, the Nistan finish on the frame has a tendency to feel somewhat slippery, even with the grips checkering. It’s noticeable when shooting during the hot and humid summer months.
On my pistol, it has also been susceptible to minor rust spots on the slide, especially during that hot and humid summer training and match season.
Surefire just announced the release of the new XR2 Compact Light and Laser. The XR2 is a rechargeable handgun weapon light and laser sight made for mid-size concealed-carry pistols.
XR2 Compact Light and Laser
The XR2 uses twin recoil-proof LEDs with 800 lumens downrange output. They have enough spill to maintain situational awareness while still lighting up the target. In addition to the lights, it has a <5-milliwatt Class IIIa laser for aiming without relying on your weapons sight.
The laser is available in red or green, and the ambidextrous switch allows for easy activation. The mode switch lets you select from light only, laser only, or light plus laser. It also has momentary on or constant on modes.
Quick Detach battery
What makes the XR2 unique is its quick detach battery. The rechargeable battery can be removed or swapped without taking the light off of the gun. That means you don’t lose the zero on your laser when you change batteries.
It has a battery-mounted fuel gauge that lets you keep track of your charge. That way you don’t have to guess when your light might go dead. The XR2 Compact Light and Laser comes with a charging cradle with two charging bays so you can always have a spare battery available to swap out.
Click here to read Part 1 of this article, which covers the hands-on portion of actually shooting shells through my shotgun. Recovered Hornady Versatite wads are shown above.
Old 2019 photo of the same shotgun, my Beretta 1301 Tactical next to some spent Flite Control wads I recovered.
Pattern Analysis
Does the Hornady Versatite wad make a difference? It does. One simply needs to look at the patterns my Beretta printed at 5 and 10 yards. In this way, they’re very similar to patterns I had seen in the past with Flite Control, where all the pellets are still inside the wad or very close to it.
Examining the recovered Versatite wads, they are quite similar in appearance to the Flite Control wads themselves. So, it wouldn’t be a stretch to assume they both work off similar principles.
In fact, something that Matt Haught of Symtac Consulting taught me is that both the Versatite and Flite Control wads share a “common ancestor” from the wad used in little known Choke Law Enforcement Buckshot load developed by a man named Chris Billings some 25 years ago.
Even at shorter distances of 5-10 yards, one can generally observe a larger pattern from standard buckshot loads that use unsophisticated horsehair, felt, or plastic wads.
For reference, the wider 10-yard pattern from Target 1 in Part 1 of this series is still fairly “tight” in relation to those standard loads. The same is true of the patterns printed at 15, 20 and 25 yards so there’s no doubt the Versatite wad certainly affects the shot column positively.
Is There a Trade-Off?
With that being said, I think the ultra-low recoil found in this load comes at a trade-off, especially for further shots. There’s much discussion on Internet based shotgun groups and social media channels about how high velocity buckshot with nine pellets ought to be avoided because it promotes fliers. Could the opposite could also be true too?
Perhaps the propensity for fliers could also increase with payloads with lower muzzle velocities that run out of steam sooner. According to Hornady’s own website, these loads exit the muzzle of an 18-inch Remington 870 at 985 FPS (the 1100 FPS rating is based on a longer 30-inch test barrel).
985 FPS is certainly on the milder side of shotshells, and the trade-off for less recoil in this instance will be slightly wider patterns beyond 20 yards. I’m also curious how the lack of grex or other variables in the Hornady TAP loads affects dispersion at further distances.
Anecdotal Comparison
My 25-yard patterns in Part 1 could be an indication of wider patterns with slower velocities. But again, to test that out, I’d need a more robust sampling involving more than one shotgun barrel. I found some old photos on my phone from four years ago that serve as weak anecdotal information that’s also in line with my observation “educated guess.”
These pictures show cardboard sheets that I shot with the same Beretta 1301 using both Federal reduced recoil 9-pellet Flite Control LE 132 00 (1145 FPS) and their High Velocity Flite Control LE 127 00 (1325 FPS). The latter also happens to be my cartridge of choice. But looking over these photos, it’s clear that the faster LE 127 00 has a marginally tighter pattern at 25 yards.
Do keep in mind that both Flite Control loads use copper-plated shot and grex, which are other variables that could also play a role. Nonetheless, the faster LE 127 00 load seems to pattern slightly tighter, even with the “flyer.”
The pictures: I took only one shot at each target. I shot these nearly four years ago before I was better informed about shotguns and patterning them properly. In my defense, any flavor of Flite Control was very hard to come by during peak COVID. At least I managed to have both of these saved on my phone, so I wanted to share them. At the time, I was measuring spread by measuring the furthest two pellet impacts with a ruler along two axes.
I shot these sheets of cardboard with the same Beretta 1301 shotgun at 25 yards in November of 2020 using the Federal Flite Control 9-Pellet LE 127 00 (HV) and LE 132 00 (low recoil) loads.
Additional Anecdotal Images: Old School Buckshot
While digging through my phone for the above Flite Control patterns, I found more images of poorly labeled buckshot patterns from early 2020 that I had patterned through my Beretta 1301 for fun as well. I had four shells, two with blue hulls and two with green hulls from Remington-Peters.
Both of these 12-gauge loads were loaded with 12 pellets of 00 buckshot, and both had very stout recoil and threw wide patterns at 15 yards, as shown below. Due to the way the pellets were stacked in the shell, they had a tendency to fly out and throw cool snowflake patterns at closer distances. They were visually stunning but not helpful as pellets ought to ideally remain centralized (see green pattern below on 20-inch wide cardboard).
My intention in showing these is for additional reference and to illustrate how well the Versatite or Flite Control shuttlecock-shaped wads work in of themselves.
3-4 inch “snowflake” patterns15 yards
The Takeaway
Trading Velocity For Recoil
The ultra-low-recoil nature of this load means that it cycled, but just barely, through my Beretta 1301 Tactical. Even though the Beretta Blink gas system is one of the most tolerant in any semi-auto shotgun, like any system it still has a threshold of the type of shells it can reliably cycle.
Beyond the patterning exhibited by the Hornady 12ga TAP low-recoil load, which I don’t find to be too disagreeable, this load is best left to pump-action shotguns only. To be clear, all shells were successfully fired through my shotgun without any jams or stuck hulls. On a defensive firearm like my home defense shotgun, I don’t think compromising the shotgun’s ability to cycle in a critical scenario is worth trading for a payload with less recoil.
As a rule of thumb, most semi-automatic shotguns generally dislike loads rated below 1200 FPS, and perhaps I was better off patterning these 12-ga TAP loads with a Remington 870. I simply opted for my Beretta 1301 because their Steelium barrels are of extremely high-quality and I wanted to see how the Versatite wad would react.
Final Thoughts
Ultimately, shotguns and their patterns can be fairly unique, which is why it’s important to always pattern and verify a specific load through a specific shotgun above everything else. In the case of this post, that was my ulterior motive. To simply share some anecdotal figures and my experience trying out a new-to-me shotshell.
The similar characteristics between the open wad in the original Choke LE buckshot load, Federal Premium’s Flite Control wad, and the Hornady Versatite wad trying out Big Red’s shells had been on my to-do list for some time. In my area, it isn’t easy for non-LE to get their hands on Hornady TAP ammunition in general. So, I figured the best use of these odd 20 shells I randomly got would be to pattern them through my Beretta 1301 just to see what they could do.
Hornady does sell shotshells loaded with their Versatite wad to the public under the Hornady Black and Critical Defense product lines. So, in fairness, Hornady isn’t restricting Versatite loads to law enforcement SKUs only.
The quality of the shells themselves was what you’d expect from Hornady. Clean and crisp crimps with smooth hulls and spotless brass bases. Since context matters, I wouldn’t immediately dismiss the Hornady 12-gauge TAP load, especially if the distance in my defensive domain is less than 20 yards.
Unfortunately, I don’t have any more shells at the moment, but I’d love nothing more than to shoot more patterns at 20 and 25 yards since those were somewhat of a mixed bag, as shown in Part 1. It certainly looks like this Hornady TAP 12GA Versatite load will generally pattern well into an A/C zone-sized target inside of 15 yards.
When I first saw Desert Tech’s TREK-22 bullpup conversion stock for the Ruger 10/22 platform at SHOT a couple of years ago, I was pretty enamored with it. It’s a really sleek, compact package, perfect for a survival rifle or as a Jeep, snowmobile, or ATV gun. I wanted one pretty bad but didn’t have a donor 10/22 handy. Well now Desert Tech has solved that problem by releasing the TREK-22 as a complete rifle.
The TREK-22
Desert Tech is known for its bullpup hunting and tactical rifles. The company has a lot of experience in making precision, compact rifles and now they’ve applied it to the .22LR.
The TREK-22 has an overall length of just 26.5 inches and weighs only 4.8 pounds. It manages to pack an 18-inch, free-floated bull barrel into that space. The barrel is threaded for a suppressor or compensator, too. It uses a straight blade trigger that has a reduced trigger pull weight of just 3.5 pounds. Which is pretty amazing for a bullpup system.
The TREK-22’s stock is made from Glass-Reinforced Polymer. It has integrated M-LOK slots, sling studs, and a MIL-STD-1913 Picatinny rail. In addition, it has storage for two extra magazines. The TREK-22 stock has an integrated angled grip, keeping the whole package very slim. Although it looks a little odd, it actually feels very comfortable when you’re shooting. The available colors are Olive Drab green, Flat Dark Earth, and Gray.
The TREK-22 is made in the U.S.A. and has an MSRP of $799.99. However, there’s a $50 discount available for pre-orders. Shipments begin in September of 2024, and the first run is limited. So, if you think you want one, you better jump on a pre-order now.
In Part 1 and Part 2, I covered the finer details of the Taurus Executive Grade Revolver. Part 3 of the Taurus 692 Executive Grade Review covers the live-fire portion, shooting rimmed .357 Magnum and .38 Special revolver cartridges. In Part 4, I will cover shooting 9mm Luger ammo and the gun’s results with the other cylinder.
Other than a 25-round box of Hornady Critical Defense (110-grain FTX .38 Special +P), I exclusively fired .357 Magnum cartridges. This includes the fairly new High Desert Cartridge Company offerings, along with factory cartridges from Fiocchi (125 and 158-grain Defense Dynamics JHP) and Sierra (158-grain Sportsmaster JHP, also relatively new).
15-Yard Accuracy and Velocity Evaluations
I shot the Taurus 692 Executive Grade revolver off a bag at a distance of 15 yards. Using my new Garmin Xero C1 chronograph, I captured the muzzle velocity of 20 rounds from each load of the cartridges I list above (and below). Prior to shooting for groups and data, I drifted the rear sight so that 158-grain loads would print dead-center at 10 yards as the gun sat in my hands freestyle.
To simplify the process, I shot everything into groups of ten rounds for a total of ten ten-round groups. I seldom shoot double-action revolvers in single-action, but I made an exception in this case for pure convenience. Funny enough, after shooting the Taurus 692 Executive Grade’s trigger in single-action 100 times, I think the double-action trigger pull is nicer than its single-action trigger pull, ironically. This is fine by me because revolvers are meant to be shot double-action.
For consistency’s sake, I also used a deliberate 6 o’clock hold, and this certainly affected my point of impact, which pushed nearly every group low, naturally. I couldn’t help but notice how much lower the shift affected the lighter Fiocchi .357 Magnum 125-grain JHP and the Hornady 110-grain .38 Special +P loads.
The nice thing about a revolver like the Taurus 692 Executive is that it has both adjustable sights and a more modern and faster 1:10 barrel twist. Both of these can help the revolver better adapt to more modern loads.
Unfortunately, some groups are skewed by error on my part. But this is part of the reason I chose to shoot ten-round groups in the first place. Ideally, I’d have a Ransom rest, but those aren’t cheap and are even more cumbersome.
Hornady Critical Defense 110-grain FTX (.38 Special +P)
Notes: This was the only .38 Special load I tested through the Taurus 692 Executive Grade. Though the recoil impulse when shooting off a bag/rest always feels different than shooting with a natural two-handed grip, it was definitely noticeable how mild and pleasant this cartridge felt through this fairly heavy and ported revolver.
Sierra Sports Master 158-grain JHP
Notes: Group 1 with the Sierra Sports Master 158-grain JHP was the tightest overall group I fired with the Taurus 692 Executive Grade. The reason Group 2 was more open is more my fault than the revolver or these cartridges. I’ve been shooting Sierra Sports Master ammunition since last year for my accuracy evaluations, and it has proven to be generally consistent and accurate.
Fiocchi Defense Dynamics 158-grain JHP
Notes: I had two egregious flyers that I decided to omit from Group 1. They’re on the far left and nowhere near the main cluster. Group 2 has 11 shots because I accidentally deleted the muzzle velocity of one of the original 20 shots, so I fired an extra round to account for it.
Fiocchi Defense Dynamics 125-grain JHP
Notes: Nothing out of the ordinary to report. It’s decent overall ammo across calibers. But I’ve noticed that Defense Dynamics tends to be on the flashy side, at least with 9mm and .357 Magnum, so far.
High Desert Cartridge Company 158-grain XTP
Notes: I wrote an entirely separate article about the High Desert 158-grain XTP load and what it’s designed to do.
Shooting The Taurus 692 Executive Grade On The Range
Shooting various loads off a bench or bag only tells one small part of the story in any handgun review. While it’s good for printing groups and capturing muzzle velocities, it’s only good for that. There’s a lot of nuance that gets left out.
Therefore, my proper introduction to the Taurus 692 Executive Grade revolver began with some 10-round NRA B-8 targets. I shot these targets with High Desert Cartridge’s .357 Magnum practice load and Federal American Eagle .357 JHP at 10 yards. I would have grouped and chronograph these, too, but I didn’t have enough on hand.
Dot Torture
My other standard operating procedure in reviewing handguns is shooting Dot Torture. So, I also shot 50 rounds at a Dot Torture target using the Fiocchi 125-grain JHP ammo.
Dot Torture is an interesting exercise that’s both easy and challenging. There is no time limit, and the goal is consistency and accuracy over each of those 50 rounds. It calls for steady focus and requires the shooter to apply the fundamentals with each trigger press made. I dropped three careless shots for a final score of 47/50.
My biggest insight from shooting Dot Torture with the Taurus is just how controllable of a double-action trigger this revolver has. While any tuned competition revolver will have a lighter double-action pull, the trigger on the Taurus is smooth enough to allow the shooter to carefully manage the trigger for each shot until the trigger breaks. The fact that I managed to shoot what are arguably the hardest targets on Dot Torture—the single-hand only at #5 and #8—cleanly is strong proof.
Shooting Controlled Pairs
After Dot Torture, I took some leftover cartridges and attempted to shoot controlled pairs quickly at a 4×6-inch target from 5 yards. My splits weren’t blazing fast, but they were certainly spirited. However, while shooting these, the gun’s hardwood stocks, though gorgeous, proved less than ideal due to their shape.
I will cover this in more detail towards the end of my review. But to summarize, the stocks can easily slide under in the hand during recoil, making it harder to control the revolver during rapid double-action shooting.
Although the porting changes the revolver’s blast and reports, its helpfulness in controlling muzzle flip was quite noticeable. Likewise, it does become handy for extended sessions shooting full-house .357 Magnum loads, as I was shooting that day.
SIG SAUER just dropped the updated GEN II ROMEO5 a couple of days ago, and now they’re following with the ROMEO3MAX-PRO. The ROMEO3MAX-PRO is a pistol optic designed in conjunction with Max Michel. Max is the Team SIG Captain and a 7-time World Speed Shooting Champion.
The ROMEO3MAX-PRO
Let’s take a look at what’s new with the ROMEO3MAX-PRO. First, it uses the common DeltaPoint Pro footprint for direct mount. Older versions of the ROMEO 3 have a proprietary footprint and require an adapter plate. Eliminating the need for the plate allows you to mount your optic lower. This gives you less height over the bore axis and lets you co-witness your iron sights better.
SIG increased the dot size from 6 MOA to 8 MOA (it is also available with a 3 MOA dot). This allows for faster reticle acquisition and lets you run the dot at a lower brightness. Aside from saving battery life, the lower brightness decreases reticle distortion, which is especially helpful to folks with astigmatism.
The ROMEO3MAX-PRO adds three additional brightness settings, giving you more range to fine-tune your brightness in varying lighting conditions. SIG also reconfigured the brightness buttons so that up is now at the front and down is at the back. This is the industry standard, so folks will be able to operate the optic intuitively.
Additionally, the company switched from Allen head screws to slotted screws for windage and elevation adjustments and to access the battery tray. Now you don’t have to keep a tiny Allen wrench in your range kit, any small slotted screwdriver will do.
The lens size increased to 31mm from 30mm. It’s a touch bigger and gives you a little better downrange awareness. SIG has also included a MAGNETAC rubber optic cover. The cover automatically turns the reticle off when you install it. This helps save battery life when the gun is in storage or when not in use at the range.
The ROMEO3MAX-PRO is designed by and for competitive shooters and carries an MSRP of $699.99.
This is the second part of my review of the Taurus 692 Executive Grade revolver. You can read Part 1 here.
Trigger And Hammer
A detail shot of the back of the Taurus 692 EXG’s frame. The checkering on the hammer spur is clearly visible.
Ignition with the Taurus 692 EXG comes by way of an exposed hammer and a modern frame-mounted firing pin. The hammer, which matches the rest of the revolver with the same satin hue, has a wide, knurled spur. The trigger also has a matching satin stainless tone.
I appreciate that neither the hammer spur nor the face of the trigger is excessively wide, as one would find on a more purpose-driven, accurized target revolver. Working in tandem with the hammer is a transfer bar safety of the same type commonly found on virtually all modern-produced Taurus revolvers.
The width of the trigger face is just about perfect. It’s not too narrow nor too wide while also being smooth and rounded. On revolvers, length of pull will vary with stocks. But the distance, as measured from the centermost portion of the trigger face to the interior of the Altamont stocks’ sinusoidal curve, is about 1.75 inches.
Executive Grade Action
As part of the Executive Grade family, this revolver’s action gets extra attention compared to the typical Taurus Tracker offerings. As such, the trigger pull is smoother out of the box compared to the standard models. Using a digital trigger pull scale, ten double action trigger pulls averaged out to 9 lb, 12 oz. In single action, ten trigger pulls averaged out to 6 pounds even.
This revolver isn’t a match-grade competition gun, so expecting that type of trigger pull from the factory is pointless. However, for a general-purpose revolver or gun that’s likely to be carried on the hip, the smoothness and feel from the factory double-action trigger pull are fantastic.
My experience with Taurus products also means that this trigger will wear in and feel even better after some use. I tend to shoot virtually every revolver with a double-action trigger pull, and this one gets no complaints from me. With a proper grip, it’s smooth enough to not disturb the sight picture.
At this point, I’ve fired nearly 250 rounds of .357 Magnum loaded with various bullets and propellants. Due to the open nature of the revolver’s architecture, they tend to accumulate soot from propellants more so than semi-auto handguns. Oftentimes, this extra layer of soot and fouling starts to affect the trigger’s linkage in both trigger pull smoothness and the manner in which the cylinder rotates.
The 692 EXG’s satin finish seems to resist this soot and reinforce the action’s smoothness.
Quick Change Cylinders
Each revolver comes with a fitted set of Taurus 692 Executive Grade 9mm and .357 Magnum / .38 Special cylinders. As the 9mm Luger is a rimless round, it requires the use of a moon clip for best results.
In addition to the Taurus 692 Executive Grade’s fit, finish, and craftsmanship, its most distinctive feature set is also what comprises the heart of this very revolver: its multi-caliber quick-change cylinder feature. It allows end users to easily shoot three different types of ammunition through the same revolver: .357 Magnum, .38 Special, and 9mm Luger.
Virtually any revolver chambered for .357 Magnum will safely handle .38 Special cartridges; the .357 Magnum is based on the .38 Special, after all. 9mm Luger is a rimless and tapered pistol cartridge meant for semi-auto handguns. This places it in a different league from straight-wall rimmed revolver rounds. However, it still shares a nominal diameter of .35-caliber along with .38 Special and .357 Magnum.
Most 9mm projectiles tend to measure between .355 to .356 inches in diameter, while most .38/.357 projectiles measure between .357 and .358 inches, depending on style. With only 2 to 3 thousandths of an inch in difference, it can be fired safely through the same bore.
The included fitted cylinders are unfluted with the same satin stainless steel finish as the rest of the 692 EXG’s metal. Because fluted cylinders are still the norm in the world of revolvers, the lack of flutes, in this case, adds another layer of distinction. Moreover, both cylinders each have 692 EXG’s unique serial number engraved along with the caliber. Both the 9mm cylinder and the .38/.357 cylinder have a seven-round capacity.
Both the .357 Magnum / .38 Special and 9mm Luger Cylinder Assemblies in all of their unfluted glory.
Cylinder Retention System
Beyond the lack of cylinder fluting and the physical versatility provided by the ability to handle three different calibers, I think the Taurus 692 Executive Grade’s cherry-on-top is a one-of-a-kind “cylinder retention system.” I’ve previously touched on this feature in my article about how important revolver yoke screws are.
Most revolvers use the yoke screw (a specialized set-screw) to keep its yoke and cylinder securely fastened to the frame. Removing these components means that this screw must be undone every time. In the case of every multi-caliber Taurus Tracker revolver that ships with different cylinders, the traditional yoke screw is omitted and replaced by a spring-tensioned quick-detach plunger that holds yokes in place.
With this Taurus Tracker-specific feature, removing and switching cylinders only takes the literal push of a button and adds to the level of modularity and convenience that a multi-caliber revolver affords in the first place. Furthermore, the “cylinder retention system” also prevents undue wear and tear on the would-be yoke screw and its fine threads. Quite frankly, it’s such a novel yet simple detail that helps make the Taurus 692 EXG more functional.
The 692 EXG’s sideplate still uses a screw in the same spot where standard yoke screws fit. However, in this case, it only supports the sideplate. The QD plunger assembly is completely independent and most resembles the mechanism of a 1911 magazine catch.
A close-up of the 692 EXG’s trigger and its button for its quick-release cylinder mechanism
Transportation Case
In today’s market, ample handguns ship with basic cases, and this is something most reviewers, including myself, tend to gloss over as it’s not too directly relevant. However, I’m making an exception for this review because Taurus sends each 692 Executive Grade revolver in a hard-sided, impact-resistant, sturdy Nanuk carrying case.
The case’s interior has egg-carton padding and foam inserts with a cutout for the revolver and a separate cut-out for the spare cylinder assembly. These Nanuk cases also employ a pair of “Powerclaw” latches along with a prominent gasket to seal the inside and a pressure-release valve. It also includes a pair of reinforced holes for padlocks.
I think the inclusion of this case is a legitimate value add to every Taurus 692 Executive Grade revolver that’s sold. The revolver-shaped foam cut-out can be removed, so almost any full-size (or smaller) pistol, a spare magazine, and a 50-round box of ammunition will fit inside this Nanuk case, making it convenient for airline travel.
Externally, the case itself isn’t too thick and reasonably fits in most checked baggage. In fact, this summer, I’ve flown with this Nanuk case at least once.
Interior of Taurus 692 EXG Nanuk Hard-Sided CaseExterior of Taurus 692 EXG Nanuk Hard-Sided Case
This year, Taurus showcased the latest member of its premium Executive Grade product line: the new Taurus 692 Executive Grade revolver. This large framed double action .357 Magnum revolver is part of Taurus’ Tracker revolver family. The Tracker family consists of revolvers built around larger frames and barrels that vary between 2.5 and 6.5 inches in length.
Tracker revolvers are available in a wide spectrum of calibers, such as rimfire rounds like .22 WMR, .22 LR, and .17 HMR, and larger centerfire revolver cartridges like .357 Magnum and .44 Magnum. This also indirectly includes cartridges like .38 Special and .44 Special, which are also compatible with .357 Magnum and .44 Magnum revolvers, respectively.
Tracker revolvers that are specifically chambered for .357 Magnum and .38 Special also come with an additional fitted cylinder that’s reamed out for 9mm Luger. So, customers end up taking home a three-in-one revolver.
Taurus 692 Executive Grade Overview
692 Executive Grade Frame And Stocks
The Taurus 692 Executive Grade is a seven-shot double action revolver with a three-inch ported barrel that includes two cylinders, chambered for .357 Magnum and 9mm Luger. Both of these cylinders are unfluted and match the frame’s satin stainless steel finish.
Besides the satin finish, many of the Taurus 692 Executive Grade’s accents are in line with the rest of the Taurus Executive Grade series. These include the unique Taurus Executive Grade hologram found on the sideplate, a brass front sight, and wide, fan-shaped Altamont hardwood stocks.
The unfluted cylinder adds a distinctive and visually striking touch.
A Familiar Frame
My frame of reference vis-a-vis revolvers is best informed by my experience experience with classic Smith & Wesson revolvers. So, I couldn’t help but notice that the frame of the Taurus 692 Executive grade closely resembles the classic Smith & Wesson L-Frame.
I’d be lying if I didn’t admit that the 692 was very reminiscent of Smith’s classic 686 models. To clarify, 692s are not S&W 686 clones. But they’re categorically similar in that their frames and cylinders are of similar dimensions, and they shoot the .357 Magnum cartridge. Given the historical influence of Smith & Wesson in Brazil during the 20th century, the trained eye can detect similarities between the S&W and Taurus double-action schemes with each respective gun’s sideplates removed.
The cylinders spin in the same counterclockwise direction, and the cylinder release latches both actuate forward to unlock cylinders. The modern Taurus revolver action found across its products is best described as a simplified approach to the original double-action mechanism first codified by Smith & Wesson over one century ago.
By no means am I implying anything negative by referring to the Taurus lockwork as simplified; these revolvers have proven to work reliably and efficiently across the board in my experience with several different models. An apt comparison would be contrasting the original Colt AR-15 layout and action to nearly every modern gas-actuated rifle that followed it. The Colt AR-15 is the firearm that started the trend and set the patterns for everything else moving forward.
In the revolver world, I’d argue that the Smith & Wesson double action scheme did the same for many modern revolver lineages. Furthermore, there’s no doubt that S&W’s global pervasiveness during the 20th century was also a factor overseas as much as it was in the United States.
The 692 Executive’s Grip Frame
A close-up of the wide fan-shaped Altamont stocks
Removing the stocks of the 692 Executive reveals a grip frame very different from that found on any Smith & Wesson K or L-Frame revolver. Taurus Tracker grip frames are smaller and more rounded to the point where having either a square or round butt is irrelevant. Likewise, the hammer spring is a more modern coil spring instead of the old-fashioned leaf spring and strain screw combination found on Smiths.
The Taurus 692 EXG’s smaller and more generalized grip frame allows for a wider variety of grips and stocks to fit. The included hardwood Altamont stocks with the Taurus 692 Executive Grade have light diamond checkering on both the right and left sides, while the frontstraps and backstraps are smooth.
The fitment of the stocks is excellent, without any visible gaps. Even the seams where both sides join are nearly invisible (and parallel with the grain of the hardwood). The bottom portion of these stocks fans out and has a profile akin to many of the wooden stocks found on both vintage Smith and Colt revolvers. I think they most closely resemble the classic Colt Python’s stocks.
Sights & Barrel
The Taurus 692 Executive Grade is fitted with a solid one-piece three-inch barrel. This unit includes a faster (and arguably more modern) 1:10 barrel twist and eight port holes (four on either side) right behind the muzzle and angled upward at approximately two and eleven o’clock. The muzzle also has a recessed crown that’s set back approximately ⅛ inch deep.
On the breech side, the forcing cone matches the diameter of the charge holes, which is helpful when handling full-size magnum rounds, especially over time. The 692 EXG’s ejector rod nestles and hides in a cutout milled into the one-piece barrel. While this barrel technically does not have a true underlug by virtue of its shape, it does fit that profile, and the rod is shrouded and protected from the outside world.
The front sight, which sits on a pedestal, has a captured brass rod in a configuration that mostly resembles a fiber optic front sight. This is a unique touch that’s found on some of the other Executive Grade Models, such as The Judge EXG and the 605 EXG. In tandem with its multi-caliber role, the rear sight found on 692 EXGs is fully adjustable for windage and elevation, as having fixed sights on a multi-caliber handgun would render it less practical.
The rear sight’s face is plain, smooth, and black with a square notch. In good lighting, the end-piece of the brass rod will catch light and clearly contrast against the black of the rear sight.
