Settlement could cost Taurus $30 million

A class action lawsuit over an alleged defective pistol design by Taurus International Manufacturing, Inc. is on its way to a close and could cost the company up to $30 million, according to filings this month in a Florida federal court.

Certain details in the settlement, such as how to inform class members about it, are still being hashed out in court. But according to a preliminary agreement filed in May, Taurus agreed to a settlement that would vary in price depending on how many class members submit a claim. The agreement lists four payment structures where the price per pistol changes depending on the total number of guns returned.

Taurus will soon have to publicize the settlement and invite those in the U.S. who own one of nine different Taurus pistols to join the class. Those individuals who submit a claim will agree to take an unspecified sum in exchange for the gun.

The price will fluctuate depending on the number of claims, so cash payouts could be as much as $200 per pistol and as little as $31 a pistol, but the total amount paid will not exceed $30 million. Also, class representatives, meaning those who initially filed the lawsuit, will receive an incentive payment of up to $15,000. But class members have other options as well such as sending the pistol back to Taurus to repair the alleged defect.

When class members agree to the settlement, they also agree that they won’t file suit against Taurus for the alleged defect and Taurus does not have to admit that its design is defective. However, if class members opt out, they could pursue a separate lawsuit.

The settlement stems from a lawsuit filed by a sheriff’s deputy in Iowa in December 2013 after his gun accidentally discharged even though the manual safety was engaged and it had an internal drop safety, the lawsuit says.

The plaintiff, Chris Carter, had his Taurus Model PT-140PRO holstered, but it fell out as he pursued a suspect on foot. The gun dropped from the waist area, hit the ground and discharged, the lawsuit says. He said the trigger was never touched.

According to the deadlines and hearing dates listed with the case, a jury trial is scheduled for November.

Source Article from

This article was syndicated from is a niche news web site that publishes original reporting on the wide range of topics within the gun world. We publish Monday through Saturday. Our approach is to explore the topic of guns through the widest lens possible, to deliver these findings as fairly and accurately as possible and to host the opinions and perspectives of our writers and readers as selflessly as possible, trying our best not to get in the way of our contributors. Our desire is to allow our writers and readers to tell their stories, no matter what the story is, as long as we believe a) it will benefit or interest gun owners and b) conforms to ethical journalistic methods and practices. Our headquarters are in Illinois but our contributors submit to us from across the United States — from Maine to California, from Texas to Alaska and every state in between.