ICYMI: Court Finds Illinois Housing Authority Gun Ban Illegal

The court found this week that the Second Amendment overrules the housing authority’s ability to bar legally possessed guns from resident’s homes. (Photo: Chris Eger/Guns.com)

Gun rights groups allied with a domestic violence survivor won a case seeking to block an Illinois housing authority’s “no guns allowed” policies.

U.S. District Judge J. Phil Gilbert, an appointment by President George H. W. Bush to the federal bench, slapped down the East St. Louis Housing Authority’s gun prohibition in a three-page ruling issued this week.

The authority’s lease specifically restricts firearms possessed by the renter or guests “anywhere in the unit or elsewhere on the property” and the units are subject to “special inspections” at any time. This, argued the plaintiffs, amounts to a program that denies people their right to keep and bear arms simply because they are at a financial disadvantage and need government housing.

Gilbert agreed, saying, “Among whatever else, the Second Amendment protects the right of a law-abiding individual to possess functional firearms in his or her home for lawful purposes, most notably for self-defense and defense of family.”

As such, the order blocks ESLHA from enforcing their ban and requires the subsidized housing provider to change their lease to no longer prohibit those otherwise qualified under Illinois law to possess firearms in their residences.

The case was brought last year by an unidentified plaintiff who was forced due to family health issues to seek governmental assistance. The woman, hiding from a violent domestic abuser, could not possess a legal firearm in her residence due to ESHLA’s policy. The case was backed by the Illinois State Rifle Association and the Second Amendment Foundation.

“This situation was made even more outrageous considering what has happened to Ms. Doe while living at her home,” Alan Gottlieb, SAF founder, said of the case. “We’ve explained how she was beaten and raped in January 2017, and her children stopped the attack only by threatening to use a gun. On two other occasions, Ms. Doe had to call police due to shootings in nearby residences. When the housing authority threatened to terminate her lease due to the gun in her residence, they insisted that the building is safe, so she doesn’t need a gun.”

Similarly, other states have moved to overturn gun bans in public housing in recent years following legal challenges. In 2014, a ruling by the Delaware Supreme Court struck down existing policies prohibiting guns in common areas of the Wilmington Housing Authority as unconstitutional.

This article was syndicated from Guns.com Guns.com is a niche news web site that publishes original reporting on the wide range of topics within the gun world. We publish Monday through Saturday. Our approach is to explore the topic of guns through the widest lens possible, to deliver these findings as fairly and accurately as possible and to host the opinions and perspectives of our writers and readers as selflessly as possible, trying our best not to get in the way of our contributors. Our desire is to allow our writers and readers to tell their stories, no matter what the story is, as long as we believe a) it will benefit or interest gun owners and b) conforms to ethical journalistic methods and practices. Our headquarters are in Illinois but our contributors submit to us from across the United States — from Maine to California, from Texas to Alaska and every state in between.